Assang gets Ecuadorian ID. Working on passport and the immunity to leave

[hater]

Good news for all peace loving folk of the world

Lord Assange has been granted ecuadorian ID well underway toward a passport.

Pretty soon he would be given a diplomatic post thus diplomatic immunity. He will soon leave the Embassy!

:wow

Great nes lets hope no snipers cancel those plans

Assange, who’s been holed up in Ecuador’s London embassy for more than five years after gaining asylum from the South American country in 2012, posted the unsmiling, three-quarter portrait -- with no context -- in the yellow, blue and red top as reports from Quito suggested he’d been issued a new passport. Daily newspaper El Universo cited sources saying that Assange had been issued both a national ID card and passport, while a search on the country’s tax office website confirmed his “cedula” number as 1729926483.

[Spurtacular]

Good news for all peace loving folk of the world

Lord Assange has been granted ecuadorian ID well underway toward a passport.

Pretty soon he would be given a diplomatic post thus diplomatic immunity. He will soon leave the Embassy!

:wow

Great nes lets hope no snipers cancel those plans

Assange, who’s been holed up in Ecuador’s London embassy for more than five years after gaining asylum from the South American country in 2012, posted the unsmiling, three-quarter portrait -- with no context -- in the yellow, blue and red top as reports from Quito suggested he’d been issued a new passport. Daily newspaper El Universo cited sources saying that Assange had been issued both a national ID card and passport, while a search on the country’s tax office website confirmed his “cedula” number as 1729926483.

Great news. None of the sperm shielding chumpettes are gonna like this.

[Pavlov]

An FCO spokesperson, confirming the latest attempt to resolve the impasse, said on Wednesday night: “The government of Ecuador recently requested diplomatic status for Mr Assange here in the UK. The UK did not grant that request, nor are we in talks with Ecuador on this matter. Ecuador knows that the way to resolve this issue is for Julian Assange to leave the embassy to face justice.”

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/jan/10/julian-assanges-bid-for-diplomatic-status-rejected-by-uk-government

lol

[ElNono]

Swedish prosecutors last year unexpectedly dropped their investigation into allegations against him, which included a claim of rape. He had been resisting extradition to Stockholm for years.

No surprises there...

[Spurtacular]

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/jan/10/julian-assanges-bid-for-diplomatic-status-rejected-by-uk-government

lol

Good news for you; this guy really doesn't like Hillary.

[Spurtacular]

Swedish prosecutors last year unexpectedly dropped their investigation into allegations against him, which included a claim of rape. He had been resisting extradition to Stockholm for years.

No surprises there...

Globalist ploy failed.

[Pavlov]

Good news for you; this guy really doesn't like Hillary.Why do you like him so much?


Globalist ploy failed.What's your definitin of a globalist?

[Spurtacular]

Why do you like him so much?

Why do you hate him so much?

[Pavlov]

Why do you hate him so much?He's not impartial and probably got a lot of people persecuted or killed by not redacting information that had no value except to those who wanted to do the persecuting and killing.

Why do you like him so much?

What is your definition of a globalist?

[Chris]

"probably" :lol

[Spurtacular]

What is your definition of a globalist?

I already told you when you posed this question, I don't answer stupid questions.

[Spurtacular]

"probably" :lol

:lol

[Spurtacular]

He's not impartial and probably got a lot of people persecuted or killed by not redacting information that had no value except to those who wanted to do the persecuting and killing.




Another Conspiracy theory! And :lol at the idea that journalists shouldn't report truth cos the bad guys will be upset.

Not impartial? You must really hate the New York Times, then.

948212213969555463

I'll put a check mark in the hates box for NY Times in my dossier on you.

[Pavlov]

I already told you when you posed this question, I don't answer stupid questions.It's OK that you don't know. You're pretty ignorant all around.

[Pavlov]

Another Conspiracy theory! And :lol at the idea that journalists shouldn't report truth cos the bad guys will be upset.

Not impartial? You must really hate the New York Times, then.

948212213969555463

I'll put a check mark in the hates box for NY Times in my dossier on you.:lmao James O'Keefe

Why do you like Assange so much?

[Spurtacular]

Why do you like him so much?

https://78.media.tumblr.com/40139eff86612269a627d6f470c04210/tumblr_ol46guJU2Z1so803yo1_500.gif

[Pavlov]

non answer cop outWhy do you like Assange so much?

[Spurtacular]

:lmao James O'Keefe

Why do you like Assange so much?

It's right there on camera, bro. So, I'll just put a check mark for doesn't like NYT; not objective. Cos we all know how high minded you are. :lol

[Pavlov]

It's right there on camera, bro. So, I'll just put a check mark for doesn't like NYT; not objective. Cos we all know how high minded you are. :lolWhy do you like Assange so much?

[Spurtacular]

Why do you like Assange so much?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsCR05oKROA

[Pavlov]

non answerWhy do you like Assange so much?

[pgardn]

He's going nowhere unless they smuggle him out of the U.K.

[Spurtacular]

Why do you like Assange so much?

For the same reason a top Hillary sperm shielder like you hates him.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlmcHzXcAAbE01.jpg

[Pavlov]

"probably" :lol


:lolOK guys, we'll do a quick yes or no question you will never answer:

If your name, address and full medical record were taken without your knowledge or consent and published on a website for everyone to see, would you approve of that?

Yes or no.

[Spurtacular]

OK guys, we'll do a quick yes or no question you will never answer:

If your name address and full medical record were taken without your knowledge or consent and published on a website for everyone to see, would you approve of that?

Yes or no.

You're showing no correlation in even asking that question.

[Pavlov]

You're showing no correlation in even asking that question.Assange did just that.

Would you approve of his doing the same with your information?

Yes or no.

[Spurtacular]

Assange did just that.

Would you approve of his doing the same with your information?

Yes or no.

Present the case in which you speak of with clarity.

[Pavlov]

Present the case in which you speak of with clarity.Cases.

Multiple cases.

Myriad cases.
CAIRO (AP) — WikiLeaks’ giant data dumps have rattled the National Security Agency, the U.S. Democratic Party, and the Saudi foreign ministry. But its spectacular mass-disclosures have also included the personal information of hundreds of people — including sick children, rape victims and mental health patients, The Associated Press has found.

In the past year alone, the radical transparency group has published medical files belonging to scores of ordinary citizens while many hundreds more have had sensitive family, financial or identity records posted to the web. In two particularly egregious cases, WikiLeaks named teenage rape victims. In a third case, the site published the name of a Saudi citizen arrested for being gay, an extraordinary move given that homosexuality can lead to social ostracism, a prison sentence or even death in the ultraconservative Muslim kingdom.

“They published everything: my phone, address, name, details,” said a Saudi man who told AP he was bewildered that WikiLeaks had revealed the details of a paternity dispute with a former partner. “If the family of my wife saw this ... Publishing personal stuff like that could destroy people.”

WikiLeaks’ mass publication of personal data is at odds with the site’s claim to have championed privacy even as it laid bare the workings of international statecraft, drawing criticism from longtime allies.

Attempts to reach WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange for an interview over the past month have been unsuccessful and the ex-hacker did not reply to written questions. In a series of tweets following the publication of the AP’s story, WikiLeaks dismissed the privacy concerns as “recycled news” and said they were “not even worth a headline.”

Assange has been holed up for the past four years in Ecuador’s embassy in London, where he sought refuge when Swedish prosecutors sought to question him over sexual assault allegations. He gave no indication Tuesday that the offending material would be taken down.

WikiLeaks’ purported mission is to bring censored or restricted material “involving war, spying and corruption” into the public eye, describing the trove amassed thus far as a “giant library of the world’s most persecuted documents.”

The library is growing quickly, with half a million files from the U.S. Democratic National Committee, Turkey’s governing party and the Saudi Foreign Ministry added in the last year or so. But the library is also filling with rogue data, including computer viruses, spam, and a compendium of personal records.

The Saudi diplomatic cables alone hold at least 124 medical files, according to a sample analyzed by AP. Some described patients with psychiatric conditions, seriously ill children or refugees.

“This has nothing to do with politics or corruption,” said Dr. Nayef al-Fayez, a consultant in the Jordanian capital of Amman who confirmed that a brain cancer patient of his was among those whose details were published to the web. Dr. Adnan Salhab, a retired practitioner in Jordan who also had a patient named in the files, expressed anger when shown the document.

“This is illegal what has happened,” he said in a telephone interview. “It is illegal!”

The AP, which is withholding identifying details of most of those affected, reached 23 people — most in Saudi Arabia — whose personal information was exposed. Some were unaware their data had been published; WikiLeaks is censored in the country. Others shrugged at the news. Several were horrified.

One, a partially disabled Saudi woman who’d secretly gone into debt to support a sick relative, said she was devastated. She’d kept her plight from members of her own family.

“This is a disaster,” she said in a phone call. “What if my brothers, neighbors, people I know or even don’t know have seen it? What is the use of publishing my story?”

Medical records are widely counted among a person’s most private information. But the AP found that WikiLeaks also routinely publishes identity records, phone numbers and other information easily exploited by criminals.

The DNC files published last month carried more than two dozen Social Security and credit card numbers, according to an AP analysis assisted by New Hampshire-based compliance firm DataGravity. Two of the people named in the files told AP they were targeted by identity thieves following the leak, including a retired U.S. diplomat who said he had to change his number after being bombarded by threatening messages.

The number of people affected easily reaches into the hundreds. Paul Dietrich, a transparency activist, said a partial scan of the Saudi cables alone turned up more than 500 passport, identity, academic or employment files.

The AP independently found three dozen records pertaining to family issues in the cables — including messages about marriages, divorces, missing children, elopements and custody battles. Many are very personal, like the marital certificates that reveal whether the bride was a virgin. Others deal with Saudis who are deeply in debt, including one man who says his wife stole his money. One divorce document details a male partner’s infertility. Others identify the partners of women suffering from sexually transmitted diseases including HIV and Hepatitis C.

Lisa Lynch, who teaches media and communications at Drew University and has followed WikiLeaks for years, said Assange may not have had the staff or the resources to properly vet what he published. Or maybe he felt that the urgency of his mission trumped privacy concerns.

“For him the ends justify the means,” she said.

___

Initially conceived as a Wikipedia-style platform for leakers, WikiLeaks’ initial plan was for a “worldwide community of informed users” to curate the material it released wholesale, according to the site’s now defunct question-and-answer page. Prominent transparency advocate Steven Aftergood privately warned Assange a few days before the site’s debut that the publish-everything approach was problematic.

“Publication of information is not always an act of freedom,” Aftergood said in an email sent in late 2006. “It can also be an act of aggression or oppression.”

Those concerns were heightened after WikiLeaks published a series of documents leaked by U.S. Army intelligence analyst Bradley Manning, now known as Chelsea, in 2010. The publication provided explosive evidence of human rights abuses in Iraq and Pakistani cooperation with the Taliban in Afghanistan — among many other revelations — but it also led to allegations that civilians in war zones had been endangered.

Assange insisted WikiLeaks had a system to keep ordinary people’s information safe.

“We have a harm minimization policy,” the Australian told an audience in Oxford, England in July of 2010. “There are legitimate secrets. Your records with your doctor, that’s a legitimate secret.”

Assange initially leaned on cooperating journalists, who flagged sensitive material to WikiLeaks which then held them back for closer scrutiny. But Assange was impatient with the process, describing it as time-consuming and expensive.

“We can’t sit on material like this for three years with one person to go through the whole lot, line-by-line, to redact,” he told London’s Frontline Club the month after his talk in Oxford. “We have to take the best road that we can.”

Assange’s attitude has hardened since. A brief experiment with automatic redactions was aborted. The journalist-led redactions were abandoned too after Assange’s relationship with the London press corps turned toxic. By 2013 WikiLeaks had written off the redaction efforts as a wrong move.

Withholding any data at all “legitimizes the false propaganda of ‘information is dangerous,’” the group argued on Twitter.

But some private information genuinely is dangerous, courting serious consequences for the people involved.

Three Saudi cables published by WikiLeaks identified domestic workers who’d been tortured or sexually abused by their employers, giving the women’s full names and passport numbers. One cable named a male teenager who was raped by a man while abroad; a second identified another male teenager who was so violently raped his legs were broken; a third outlined the details of a Saudi man detained for “sexual deviation” — a derogatory term for homosexuality.

Scott Long, an LGBT rights activist who has worked in the Middle East, said the names of rape victims were off-limits. And he worried that releasing the names of people persecuted for their sexuality only risked magnifying the harm caused by oppressive officials.

“You’re legitimizing their surveillance, not combating it,” Long said.https://apnews.com/b70da83fd111496dbdf015acbb7987fb/private-lives-are-exposed-wikileaks-spills-its-secrets

Now, if your name address and full medical record were taken without your knowledge or consent and published on a website for everyone to see like Assange did with these people, would you approve of that?

Yes or no.

[Spurtacular]

Cases.

Multiple cases.

Myriad cases.https://apnews.com/b70da83fd111496dbdf015acbb7987fb/private-lives-are-exposed-wikileaks-spills-its-secrets

Now, if your name address and full medical record were taken without your knowledge or consent and published on a website for everyone to see like Assange did with these people, would you approve of that?

Yes or no.

So, your point would be that you're all about the privacy of citizens? Gonna have to put a check mark in the dossier on you for hates Obama. This is good stuff. Anything else you want to add to the list?

[Pavlov]

*ding*Now, if your name, address and full medical record were taken without your knowledge or consent and published on a website for everyone to see like Assange did with these people, would you approve of that?

Yes or no.

[Spurtacular]

:cry Buzz words are muh turnoff switch :cry

:lmao

[Pavlov]

:cryyes or no questions make me shit myself:cryNow, if your name address and full medical record were taken without your knowledge or consent and published on a website for everyone to see like Assange did with these people, would you approve of that?

Yes or no.

[Spurtacular]

Now, if your name address and full medical record were taken without your knowledge or consent and published on a website for everyone to see like Assange did with these people, would you approve of that?

Yes or no.

The New York Times are alegit media outlet?

Yes or no.

You approve of the Obama presidency?

Yes or no.

[Pavlov]

*ding*

*ding*Damn you really are shitting yourself trying to change the subject of the thread to avoid a simple yes or no question that has been asked of you five times already.

Now, if your name address and full medical record were taken without your knowledge or consent and published on a website for everyone to see like Assange did with these people, would you approve of that?

Yes or no.

[DMX7]

I'm sorry to break it to you but right now it looks like he's not going to be able to leave the embassy in the UK without getting arrested even if he has citizenship in Ecuador. UK denied him diplomatic immunity necessary for him to get from the embassy to an airport. Rumor now is Ecuador may force him out of the embassy which will probably land him in a UK jail which is why he's stuck in the embassy in the first place.

[Pavlov]

I'm sorry to break it to you but right now it looks like he's not going to be able to leave the embassy in the UK without getting arrested even if he has citizenship in Ecuador. UK denied him diplomatic immunity necessary for him to get from the embassy to an airport. Rumor now is Ecuador may force him out of the embassy which will probably land him in a UK jail which is why he's stuck in the embassy in the first place.They need the closet space.

[Spurtacular]

:cry More buzz words shutting me down. :cry.

:lmao

[Pavlov]

:cryI don't know what to do to avoid this question without looking like a total pussy. Maybe I'll try changing the entire subject of the thread again. That always works!:cryNow, if your name address and full medical record were taken without your knowledge or consent and published on a website for everyone to see like Assange did with these people, would you approve of that?

Yes or no.

[DMX7]

They need the closet space.

We should be putting diplomatic pressure on Ecuador to remove him. Here's an interesting fun fact... Ecuador's official currency is the U.S. Dollar.

[Pavlov]

We should be putting diplomatic pressure on Ecuador to remove him. Here's an interesting fun fact... Ecuador's official currency is the U.S. Dollar.No, he's Spurtacular's hero because Depeche Mode.

[DMX7]

No, he's Spurtacular's hero because Depeche Mode.

I don't know what that means, but he's Spurtacular's hero for probably another reason. :lol

[hater]

I'm sorry to break it to you but right now it looks like he's not going to be able to leave the embassy in the UK without getting arrested even if he has citizenship in Ecuador. UK denied him diplomatic immunity necessary for him to get from the embassy to an airport. Rumor now is Ecuador may force him out of the embassy which will probably land him in a UK jail which is why he's stuck in the embassy in the first place.

Anything is possible but the plan is for Ecuador to give him a diplomatic position thus triggering a diplomatic immunity. UK cannot arrest a foreign diplomat especially with no charges.

Hes already halfway there

[Pavlov]

I don't know what that means, but he's Spurtacular's hero for probably another reason. :lol


Why do you like Assange so much?



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsCR05oKROABut you're right. Assange is also his hero because he releases private information and medical records of innocent people, and he would love for Assange to release his private information too.

[Pavlov]

Anything is possible but the plan is for Ecuador to give him a diplomatic position thus triggering a diplomatic immunity. UK cannot arrest a foreign diplomat especially with no charges.

Hes already halfway thereThey can't just unilaterally make him a diplomat.

[DMX7]

Anything is possible but the plan is for Ecuador to give him a diplomatic position thus triggering a diplomatic immunity. UK cannot arrest a foreign diplomat especially with no charges.

Hes already halfway there

UK just denied him diplomatic status requested by Ecuador, and he can be arrested for violating his bail conditions in the UK.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/jan/10/julian-assanges-bid-for-diplomatic-status-rejected-by-uk-government

[Spurtacular]

But you're right. Assange is also his hero because he releases private information and medical records of innocent people, and he would love for Assange to release his private information too.

Obamacare made my medical records far less "private." But again, we've established you disapprove of the Obama presidency. And phone numbers and addresses aren't exactly "private" information.

[hater]

UK just denied him diplomatic status requested by Ecuador, and he can be arrested for violating his bail conditions in the UK.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/jan/10/julian-assanges-bid-for-diplomatic-status-rejected-by-uk-government

Thats just after ecuador asked UK. Doesnt mean Assange cant become a diplomat through other means. Thats why ecuador is looking for a mediato

[djohn2oo8]

951349586915819520

[dabom]

951349586915819520

:lol

[Pavlov]

Obama*ding*

Now, if your name address and full medical record were taken without your knowledge or consent and published on a website for everyone to see like Assange did with these people, would you approve of that?

Yes or no.

[Reck]

951349586915819520

But it's a win for mah ASSANGE! :cry

[djohn2oo8]

But it's a win for mah ASSANGE! :cry

It's really a shame how these fucks who live here can support someone whose actions have been hostile towards the US. Cucks.

[hater]

Im sure he also wants put of that embassy. He will get out as long as he has guarantee he will not falk in the hands of Uncle Sam. The poor bastard would get fried by CIA and given a colon exploration daily.

Lets just hope Lord Assange can find anywhere go besides Evil American Torture chambers. Falling to american hands is equivalent to falling on ISIS hands sadly.

All peace loving and good folk should pray for him :tu

[Pavlov]

Im sure he also wants put of that embassy. He will get out as long as he has guarantee he will not falk in the hands of Uncle Sam. The poor bastard would get fried by CIA and given a colon exploration daily.

Lets just hope Lord Assange can find anywhere go besides Evil American Torture chambers. Falling to american hands is equivalent to falling on ISIS hands sadly.

All peace loving and good folk should pray for him :tuWhy?

[Reck]

Im sure he also wants put of that embassy. He will get out as long as he has guarantee he will not falk in the hands of Uncle Sam. The poor bastard would get fried by CIA and given a colon exploration daily.

Lets just hope Lord Assange can find anywhere go besides Evil American Torture chambers. Falling to american hands is equivalent to falling on ISIS hands sadly.

All peace loving and good folk should pray for him :tu

He'll always be in hiding even if he goes free. He'll be looking over his shoulders for the rest of his life.

[Spurtacular]

*ding*

Now, if your name address and full medical record were taken without your knowledge or consent and published on a website for everyone to see like Assange did with these people, would you approve of that?

Yes or no.

I think the sanctity of my medical records were violated the day Obamacare was passed. It's a moot point. And my name and address are public knowledge as is yours.

[Pavlov]

I think the sanctity of my medical records were violated the day Obamacare was passed.How?

Be specific.

Now, if your name address and full medical record were taken without your knowledge or consent and published on a website for everyone to see like Assange did with these people, would you approve of that?

Yes or no.

[Spurtacular]

It's really a shame how these fucks who live here can support someone whose actions have been hostile towards the US. Cucks.

:lmao Says the asshole who supports illegal immigration and giving our uranium to the Russian among a plethora of other things.

[Pavlov]

:lmao Says the asshole who supports illegal immigration and giving our uranium to the Russian among a plethora of other things.:lmao giving

So many ignorant *ding* attempts.

[hater]

Assange helped Manning uncover the murder of innocent Iraqi journalists at the hands of US servicemen. Lookup wikileaks manning video. Its despicable.

Anyone that doesnt respect manning and assange isking their lives to get that video out is an evil human being or just plain ignorant.

Its really sad that liberal snowflakes now want Asange head on a stick just because he unmasked crooked Neocon shillary. Sad and hilarious :lmao. The ignorance :lmao

[Spurtacular]

:cry But the Russians paid their poultry millions :cry

:lmao Pay for play in your eye, bitch.

[Pavlov]

Assange helped Manning uncover the murder of innocent Iraqi journalists at the hands of US servicemen. Lookup wikileaks manning video. Its despicable.Are you calling that attack intentional?

Yes or no.

[Pavlov]

:lmao Pay for play in your eye, bitch.Explain how the Russians were "given" uranium.

And explain how your medical records are freely available to anyone under Obamacare.

Now, if your name address and full medical record were taken without your knowledge or consent and published on a website for everyone to see like Assange did with these people, would you approve of that?

Yes or no.

[hater]

Liberals backing neocon ideologies now :lmao

[djohn2oo8]

:lmao giving

So many ignorant *ding* attempts.

His takes are on the same level as his spelling of potatoe.

[hater]

For any young snowflake that might have missed or forgotten this video:

Yw442y2fTeU

[Pavlov]

For any young snowflake that might have missed or forgotten this video:

Yw442y2fTeU


Are you calling that attack intentional?

Yes or no.

[Pavlov]

His takes are on the same level as his spelling of potatoe.The great potatoe conspiracy!

[djohn2oo8]

The great potatoe conspiracy!

Libruhllll's changed the spelling!!!!

[hater]

:lmao so called liberal snowflakes being exposed as the true neocon shills they are here :lmao

This is too easy

How does it feel to support W, Cheney and Rumsfeld ideologies? :lmao

[Pavlov]

:lmao so called liberal snowflakes being exposed as the true neocon shills they are here :lmao

This is too easy

How does it feel to support W, Cheney and Rumsfeld ideologies? :lmaoAre you saying they intentionally targeted unarmed journalists?

Yes or no.

[Spurtacular]

And explain how your medical records are freely available to anyone under Obamacare.



Explain to me how you got "freely available from what I said.

:lmao chump doing his normal gimp word games.

[Pavlov]

Explain to me how you got "freely available from what I said.

:lmao chump doing his normal gimp word games.OK, explain how Obamacare has affected your medical records to make them more freely available then they were before that you equate them with Assange's posting medical records on the internet.

[Chris]

"Can't we just drone him."- Hillary talking about Assange. What a monster.

[spurraider21]

"Can't we just drone him."- Hillary talking about Assange. What a monster.
anonymous source good now

[Spurtacular]

anonymous source good now

You do know that Hillary has verified that this subject was discussed in one of her meetings and that she didn't speak against it, right?

[Chris]

anonymous source good now

It's ok she has "no recollection" and it was "a joke".

[Chris]

You do know that Hillary has verified that this subject was discussed in one of her meetings and that she didn't speak against it, right?

I was trying to break it to him softly :lol

[DMX7]

It's being reported that the reason Ecuador wants him out of the embassy is because he has "poor personal hygiene" and is stinking the place up. Many people are also saying this.

[pgardn]

It's being reported that the reason Ecuador wants him out of the embassy is because he has "poor personal hygiene" and is stinking the place up. Many people are also saying this.

If they try and move him, and the U.K. gets a hold of him.... Expect to see him in a courtroom in the US. Then behind bars until he gets a trial.

[DMX7]

If they try and move him, and the U.K. gets a hold of him.... Expect to see him in a courtroom in the US. Then behind bars until he gets a trial.

Absolutely.

[hater]

anonymous source good now

Shilery awcknowledgd that statement but sqid she was “joking”

[hater]

:lmao at the liberal snowflake neocons

[Pavlov]

It's being reported that the reason Ecuador wants him out of the embassy is because he has "poor personal hygiene" and is stinking the place up. Many people are also saying this.Whiffyleaks: Julian Assange told to take shower
(https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/whiffyleaks-julian-assange-told-to-take-shower-b98nbkhgc?shareToken=74b761288d896eee158a20c87b3a9 5eb)

:lmao

[spurraider21]

You do know that Hillary has verified that this subject was discussed in one of her meetings and that she didn't speak against it, right?


Shilery awcknowledgd that statement but sqid she was “joking”
she didn't verify shit :lol
and she never acknowledged the statement. she said she doesnt remember making such statement, but IF she did, it would have been a joke

keep making shit up tho (while ironically complaining about fake news)

i mean, maybe she did say it, but to say "she acknowledged/verified it" is just bullshit. the only "confirmation" is from an anonymous source

[dabom]

she didn't verify shit :lol
and she never acknowledged the statement. she said she doesnt remember making such statement, but IF she did, it would have been a joke

keep making shit up tho (while ironically complaining about fake news)

i mean, maybe she did say it, but to say "she acknowledged/verified it" is just bullshit. the only "confirmation" is from an anonymous source

:wow

[hater]

951987272857001984

:cry. The love from people s astounding folks :cry

Lets pray Lord Assange will find his way out of Devil Sams tentacles :cry

[Spurtacular]

she didn't verify shit :lol
and she never acknowledged the statement. she said she doesnt remember making such statement, but IF she did, it would have been a joke

keep making shit up tho (while ironically complaining about fake news)

i mean, maybe she did say it, but to say "she acknowledged/verified it" is just bullshit. the only "confirmation" is from an anonymous source

Even the Young Turks weren't sperm shielding like you're doing, tbh.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ErH29hrpqvg

[Spurtacular]

Pavlov

The New York Times are alegit media outlet?

Yes or no.

You approve of the Obama presidency?

Yes or no.

[Pavlov]

Pavlov

The New York Times are alegit media outlet?

Yes or no.

You approve of the Obama presidency?

Yes or no.You never answered my question yes or no.

Now, if your name address and full medical record were taken without your knowledge or consent and published on a website for everyone to see like Assange did with these people, would you approve of that? Also your Social Security number.

Yes or no.

[Spurtacular]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZuQW0US2sJw

[Spurtacular]

You never answered my question yes or no.

Now, if your name address and full medical record were taken without your knowledge or consent and published on a website for everyone to see like Assange did with these people, would you approve of that? Also your Social Security number.

Yes or no.


The New York Times are alegit media outlet?

Yes or no.

You approve of the Obama presidency?

Yes or no.

[Pavlov]

The New York Times are alegit media outlet?

Yes or no.

You approve of the Obama presidency?

Yes or no.You never answered my question yes or no. I'll answer right after you answer the question I asked first.

Now, if your name address and full medical record were taken without your knowledge or consent and published on a website for everyone to see like Assange did with these people, would you approve of that? Also your Social Security number.

Yes or no.

[Spurtacular]

You never answered my question yes or no. I'll answer right after you answer the question I asked first.

Now, if your name address and full medical record were taken without your knowledge or consent and published on a website for everyone to see like Assange did with these people, would you approve of that? Also your Social Security number.

Yes or no.

I would not approve of my name, medical records or ss# being published without my consent.

The New York Times are alegit media outlet?

Yes or no.

You approve of the Obama presidency?

Yes or no.

[Pavlov]

I would not approve of my name, medical records or ss# being published without my consent.So it's a no. You disapprove of what Assange did.


The New York Times are alegit media outlet?

Yes or no.

You approve of the Obama presidency?

Yes or no.Yes and yes. To my knowledge either has intentionally published such information without any reason. You can correct me if I'm wrong.

[Spurtacular]

So it's a no. You disapprove of what Assange did.

Yes and yes. To my knowledge (n)either has intentionally published such information without any reason. You can correct me if I'm wrong.

I can correct you on your (very) poor logic. Wikileaks certainly has reasons.

[Pavlov]

I can correct you on your poor logic. Wikileaks certainly has reasons.What reasons do they have for posting medical records with identifying information and social security numbers?

Explain.

[hater]

Cant blame assange for concentrating on Devil Sam tbqh

There is only one country that wants his head on a stick at all costs and it aint Russia

Also only one of those countries have invaded/bombed/turtured dozens of countries around the world in the last 20 years

[Pavlov]

Cant blame assange for concentrating on Devil Sam tbqh

There is only one country that wants his head on a stick at all costs and it aint Russia

Also only one of those countries have invaded/bombed/turtured dozens of countries around the world in the last 20 yearsYou sure about that?

[Chris]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZuQW0US2sJw

"Can't we just drone him?" - Hillary Clinton

[Winehole23]

Assange offers to cooperate with Adam Schiff.

Assange bad now?

1000142260636389381

[Winehole23]

Adam Schiff wants Assange arrested.

For what, he hasn't said.

855409579026513920

[Winehole23]

1000147515264684038

[Winehole23]

Ecuador tightens the screws on Assange..


Lenín Moreno, the president of Ecuador (https://www.theguardian.com/world/ecuador), has said Julian Assange’s asylum status in the country’s London embassy is not under threat – provided he complies with the conditions of his stay and avoids voicing his political opinions on Twitter.


However, in an interview with Deutsche Welle (http://www.dw.com/es/len%C3%ADn-moreno-assange-puede-seguir-gozando-del-asilo-mientras-cumpla/a-43988539) on Wednesday, Moreno said his government would “take a decision” if Assange didn’t comply with the restrictions.


“Let’s not forget the conditions of his asylum prevent him from speaking about politics or intervening in the politics of other countries. That’s why we cut his communication,” he said. Ecuador suspended Assange’s communication’s system in March (https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/mar/28/julian-assange-internet-connection-ecuador-embassy-cut-off-wikileaks).
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/may/31/julian-assange-ecuador-president-lenin-moreno

[Winehole23]

...after secretly providing "security" for him:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/may/15/revealed-ecuador-spent-millions-julian-assange-spy-operation-embassy-london

[hater]

It was genius move to make Assange cuadoriAn tbqh

USA is prssuring Ecuador but if they give him up they would basically be in violation of their own constitution