Paul Krugman, NYT, CNN headline Trump Fake News Awards

[hater]

:lmao

953806250231418880

953810414508429312

953797861266903041

[hater]

:lmao even Assange joining the Fake News Awards discussion :lmao

You cant make this shit up :lol oh wait cnn, nyt and wapo can :lmao

953818076398616577

[ducks]

The Highly-Anticipated 2017 Fake News Awards
https://gop.com/the-highly-anticipated-2017-fake-news-awards/

[ducks]

The site displayed a couple of error messages, one being the usual broken link 404 error. The site appeared to crash from high traffic. Those who continued to try the link also got this message, “The site is temporarily offline, we are working to bring it back up. Please try back later.”

Despite some in politics, and many in the media, disparaging the whole idea, public interest was enough to crash the gop.com website.

[ducks]

The site displayed a couple of error messages, one being the usual broken link 404 error. The site appeared to crash from high traffic. Those who continued to try the link also got this message, “The site is temporarily offline, we are working to bring it back up. Please try back later.”

Despite some in politics, and many in the media, disparaging the whole idea, public interest was enough to crash the gop.com website.

[pgardn]

Who else do we need to bring up fake news awards other than Hater and Ducks...
It makes me think CNN might be required watching if Hater calls it fake.

Hater "You can't make this shit up" China is sending warships to Syria, shit just got real.

Oh hell yeah you can make this shit up.

[Monostradamus]

:lmao even Assange joining the Fake News Awards discussion :lmao

You cant make this shit up :lol oh wait cnn, nyt and wapo can :lmao

953818076398616577

Brah, you fell for the most blatant fake news story ever. Sit down.

https://media.giphy.com/media/z8pi6Q8wTxuFO/giphy.gif

[Spurminator]

What a stupid time to be alive

[DarrinS]

The market will never recover, tbh.

:lmao

[ducks]

Mark Cuban said the same thing

[hater]

The market will never recover, tbh.

:lmao

:lmao Krugman deserves the award hands down tbqh

They should honor him and call the award the Kruggys

[FuzzyLumpkins]

So hater do you think that Trump would consider the south and central american countries you support shitholes?

[hater]

953816188114604032

:lmao

[hater]

So hater do you think that Trump would consider the south and central american countries you support shitholes?

Of course he would. Hillary would as well.

[hater]

:lmao

953837636287856646


Holy shit :lol im done

[ducks]

Victory was not stunning ducks predicted it

[spurraider21]

:lmao

953837636287856646


Holy shit :lol im done
wat?

[Spurtacular]

wat?

Called out by Don Lemon of all people after giving a speech like he was in a Disney movie (and appealing for more judicial activism to get Hillary elected). :lmao


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eOCcRnvMPEU

[Spurtacular]

Don't forget this one:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QuURFUyrG_A

[spurraider21]

Called out by Don Lemon of all people after giving a speech like he was in a Disney movie (and appealing for more judicial activism to get Hillary elected). :lmao


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eOCcRnvMPEU
where does he say that it's their own cameraman?

[Spurtacular]

where does he say that it's their own cameraman?

Why didn't you just say that in the first place?

[koriwhat]

where does he say that it's their own cameraman?

when he suggests he worked with the same cameraman on another story. 1 min mark.

[spurraider21]

when he suggests he worked with the same cameraman on another story. 1 min mark.
that doesn't mean its a cnn cameraman :lol

[Spurtacular]

that doesn't mean its a cnn cameraman :lol

I see you skipped over my question like a pussy. The reality is that it doesn't matter much if at all that he was ever a CNN cameraman. It was fake news. But glossing over this reality, you posted "wat?" like a gimpy millennial. :lmao

[koriwhat]

that doesn't mean its a cnn cameraman :lol

lemon specifically calls him out claiming to have worked with that dude(he's a cameraman) in africa on another story. wtf do you not get?

[spurraider21]

I see you skipped over my question like a pussy. The reality is that it doesn't matter much if at all that he was ever a CNN cameraman. It was fake news. But glossing over this reality, you posted "wat?" like a gimpy millennial. :lmao
you're right. the claim that CNN interviewed their own cameraman is fake news :tu


lemon specifically calls him out claiming to have worked with that dude(he's a cameraman) in africa on another story. wtf do you not get?
lemon says he's worked with him before. doesn't mean that guy is currently a cnn cameraman, which is the claim in the tweet :lol

[Spurtacular]

you're right. the claim that CNN interviewed their own cameraman is fake news :tu


lemon says he's worked with him before. doesn't mean that guy is currently a cnn cameraman, which is the claim in the tweet :lol

So, you're mad that they maybe didn't accurately document the details of CNN's fake news. If that's where you're at, bro. :lol

[koriwhat]

lemon says he's worked with him before. doesn't mean that guy is currently a cnn cameraman, which is the claim in the tweet :lol

so you're a centrist huh? i am starting to believe you have the same mental make up as the far left who refuse facts. your semantical game is very telling.

[Reck]

I see you skipped over my question like a pussy. The reality is that it doesn't matter much if at all that he was ever a CNN cameraman. It was fake news. But glossing over this reality, you posted "wat?" like a gimpy millennial. :lmao

That's because you're a simple fuck. #potatoe #deuche.

Now time for a redeux. :lmao

[spurraider21]

so you're a centrist huh? i am starting to believe you have the same mental make up as the far left who refuse facts. your semantical game is very telling.
i dont really care what you label me as. th'pusher and boutons think im a far-right republican. you and chris thing i'm one step from joining antifa.

i think its one thing to accuse CNN of purposely interviewing their own employee to create an image of hillary support and another thing that the anchor recognizes the interviewee as somebody he has worked with before

[Spurtacular]

CALM DOWN

AND

WATCH

TRANNY PORN

:lol

[Reck]

:lol



https://movierob.files.wordpress.com/2015/08/robo2.gif?w=637

[Spurtacular]

^^^

Doubling down on a meme.

:lol Today's tranny.

[koriwhat]

i dont really care what you label me as. th'pusher and boutons think im a far-right republican. you and chris thing i'm one step from joining antifa.

i think its one thing to accuse CNN of purposely interviewing their own employee to create an image of hillary support and another thing that the anchor recognizes the interviewee as somebody he has worked with before

watch closely as the dude gets called out and humor me for a second and count how long it takes for that whole interview to come to a dead stop. you're asking the wrong question because the answer is to hard to swallow.

[Reck]

^^^

Doubling down on a meme.

:lol Today's tranny.

https://movierob.files.wordpress.com/2015/08/robo2.gif?w=637

[spurraider21]

watch closely as the dude gets called out and humor me for a second and count how long it takes for that whole interview to come to a dead stop. you're asking the wrong question because the answer is to hard to swallow.
ive seen the whole clip. i heard what lemon said. this is an old story

the interview ended before lemon even brought it up :lol... so its ridiculous to pretend it "comes to a dead stop" after he says it

[spurraider21]

Don't forget this one:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QuURFUyrG_A
https://www.snopes.com/cnn-muslim-protests-london/

[Chris]

muh snopes

[spurraider21]

muh snopes
getting facts straight is a bitch, aint it

much more easy to post fake news then run away. :lol drive by posters

[Spurtacular]

https://www.snopes.com/cnn-muslim-protests-london/

I scanned the link for potential :lol But the video says it all, tbh. It's sad to watch. It's even sadder that you make a (lazy) defense for it. :lol

[dabom]

getting facts straight is a bitch, aint it

much more easy to post fake news then run away. :lol drive by posters

:lol

[Spurminator]

Meanwhile Senator John Cornyn admits (unintentionally) to being duped by Russian Twitter bots.

954739322388930562

[Chris]

:cry Russian troll farms :cry

[Spurminator]

:cry Russian troll farms :cry

No doubt you and the POTUS got several of those emails.

lol whining about Fake News while falling for EagleJesusFlag-avatar bots.

[Spurtacular]

No doubt you and the POTUS got several of those emails.

lol whining about Fake News while falling for EagleJesusFlag-avatar bots.

Keep reaching, bro.

[Chris]

No doubt you and the POTUS got several of those emails.

lol whining about Fake News while falling for EagleJesusFlag-avatar bots.

Twitter working hard for the interests of the common American against the tyrannical Russians. Thank God for the Twitter thought police.

[Spurminator]

:cry muh @TEN_GOP :cry

[Pavlov]

Why does Chris love Putin so hard?

[ducks]

Why do you care do you think Putin can be loved by Chris and Clinton ?

[Pavlov]

Why do you care do you think Putin can be loved by Chris and Clinton ?wut

[koriwhat]

ive seen the whole clip. i heard what lemon said. this is an old story

the interview ended before lemon even brought it up :lol... so its ridiculous to pretend it "comes to a dead stop" after he says it

go stick your head back in the dirt.

[Spurtacular]

Why does Chris love Putin so hard?

Why do you sperm shield for Hillary so hard?

[spurraider21]

go stick your head back in the dirt.
looks like you didnt watch the video :lol

[Pavlov]

Why do you sperm shield for Hillary so hard?I don't. You just get triggered when I ask you simple questions like "what charges?"

You may now meltdown about it.

[DarrinS]

Dems went from not caring about Russia to complete obsession

“Gov. Romney, I’m glad you recognize al-Qaeda is a threat, because a few months ago when you were asked what is the biggest geopolitical group facing America, you said Russia — not al-Qaeda. And the 1980’s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back — because the Cold War has been over for 20 years. ”

[Pavlov]

:lol Darrin still bitter about President Black Antichrist.

[Spurtacular]

I don't. You just get triggered when I ask you simple questions like "what charges?"

You may now meltdown about it.

You sperm shield hard for her irrespective of me. Why is that?

[Pavlov]

You sperm shield hard for her irrespective of me. Why is that?Meltdown in progress.

You just suck at attacking her. Find some charges some day.

[DarrinS]

:lol Darrin still bitter about President Black Antichrist.

MSM would be even more batshit if this video existed with Trump


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=keXx0zxTarE

[Pavlov]

MSM would be even more batshit if this video existed with Trump


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=keXx0zxTarESince Trump wasn't president and scary black man was, yeah -- it would have been a problem for Trump.

:lol Darrin still trying to bite Obama's ankle after all these years.

[DarrinS]

Since Trump wasn't president and scary black man was, yeah -- it would have been a problem for Trump.

:lol Darrin still trying to bite Obama's ankle after all these years.


:cry black :cry

*ding*

[Pavlov]

:cry black :cry

*ding*Actually, your bringing up Obama in the first place is the *ding*.

[Spurtacular]

Meltdown in progress.

You just suck at attacking her. Find some charges some day.

Actually, you should find some charges or you're a sperm shielder for her by your own characterization. Go ahead and list them or else concede you're a Hillary sperm shielder.

[spurraider21]

Actually, you should find some charges or you're a sperm shielder for her by your own characterization. Go ahead and list them or else concede you're a Hillary sperm shielder.
ditto tbh :lol

[Pavlov]

Actually, you should find some charges or you're a sperm shielder for her by your own characterization. Go ahead and list them or else concede you're a Hillary sperm shielder.:lol Still melting down over declaring yourself a Hillary Clinton sperm shielder, eh?

You continue to shit on yourself.

[Spurtacular]

:lol Still melting down over declaring yourself a Hillary Clinton sperm shielder, eh?

You continue to shit on yourself.

:lol Making up alternative realities. How the unmighty has fallen.

[Pavlov]

:lol Making up alternative realities. How the unmighty has fallen.:lol Months later and you still can't name one single charge.

Reality.

[Spurtacular]

:lol Months later and you still can't name one single charge.

Reality.

:lol You're okay with defining yourself as a Hillary Clinton sperm shielder.

http://puresoftware.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/You-Might-be-Failing-as-a-Leader-If-....jpg

[Pavlov]

:lol You're okay with defining yourself as a Hillary Clinton sperm shielder.:lol So are you.

Your definition.

:lmao Can't name one Hillary crime.

[Spurtacular]

:lol So are you.

Your definition.

:lmao Can't name one Hillary crime.

It's your definition, jackass. :lmao

Also, "so are you" (confirming your Hillary sperm shielder status). :lmao

[Pavlov]

It's your definition, jackass. :lmao:lol no, it's yours.

You can't name one crime after all these years.

That's some sad shit right there.

Nothing but Ls for you.

[Spurtacular]

:lol no, it's yours.

You can't name one crime after all these years.

That's some sad shit right there.

Nothing but Ls for you.

Making up alternative realities isn't even lightweight sh**. :lmao

[Pavlov]

Spurtacular: Hillary's crimes!

Anyone else: What crimes?

Spurtacular:
http://i0.kym-cdn.com/profiles/icons/big/000/063/156/indiana_Jones_nazi_face_melt_by_iwanttorentawombat .gif

[dabom]

Spurtacular: Hillary's crimes!

Anyone else: What crimes?

Spurtacular:
http://i0.kym-cdn.com/profiles/icons/big/000/063/156/indiana_Jones_nazi_face_melt_by_iwanttorentawombat .gif

:lol

[koriwhat]

looks like you didnt watch the video :lol

no i watched it and i get where you are coming from but you're also beating around the bush. so that "cameraman" was some organic news coverage and not cnn caught red handed?

[spurraider21]

no i watched it and i get where you are coming from but you're also beating around the bush. so that "cameraman" was some organic news coverage and not cnn caught red handed?
i think cameramen also have lives outside of work which they may or may not spend time at political rallies... if CNN had "planned to interview" their own guy and pretend it was some organic reaction, the fuckin anchor during the segment wouldn't call it out :lol

can we even confirm that guy is a current cnn employee?

[koriwhat]

i think cameramen also have lives outside of work which they may or may not spend time at political rallies... if CNN had "planned to interview" their own guy and pretend it was some organic reaction, the fuckin anchor during the segment wouldn't call it out :lol

can we even confirm that guy is a current cnn employee?

head in the dirt.

[Spurtacular]

Spurtacular: Hillary's crimes!

Anyone else (including me): What crimes?


Yea, you're a Hillary sperm shielder by your own definition. :lmao

http://i0.kym-cdn.com/profiles/icons/big/000/063/156/indiana_Jones_nazi_face_melt_by_iwanttorentawombat .gif

[Spurtacular]

i think cameramen also have lives outside of work which they may or may not spend time at political rallies... if CNN had "planned to interview" their own guy and pretend it was some organic reaction, the fuckin anchor during the segment wouldn't call it out :lol

can we even confirm that guy is a current cnn employee?

:lmao Are you still trying to argue that this guy wasn't a schill? :lmao

[koriwhat]

:lmao Are you still trying to argue that this guy wasn't a schill? :lmao

dumbasses will be dumbasses no matter the amount of evidence. sad but true.

[Pavlov]

Yea, you're a Hillary sperm shielder by your own definition. :lmaoYou're still melting down months later.

You had ONE JOB.

:lol

[Spurtacular]

You're still melting down months later.

You had ONE JOB.

:lol

Lashing out cos you called yourself a hillary sperm shielder. :lmao

[koriwhat]

Actually, your bringing up Obama in the first place is the *ding*.

no one actually cares that obama is black... that's your own boogeyman you made up in your diseased head.

he wasn't this profound leader though that you'd love the world to believe he was/is. wolf in sheep's clothing.

[Chris]

Lashing out cos you called yourself a hillary sperm shielder. :lmao

:lol

[Pavlov]

Lashing out cos you called yourself a hillary sperm shielder. :lmao:lol You still can't name one crime after all these months.

You're a failure.

[koriwhat]

:lol You still can't name one crime after all these months.

You're a failure.

illegal server. illegal is in the title. spin it all you want, it was illegal and her cronies chose to look the other way. we're gonna find out everything in due time. sit back and relax because soon enough you'll be pouring with tears over your stupid **** HRC in cuffs.

[Pavlov]

illegal server. illegal is in the title. spin it all you want, it was illegal and her cronies chose to look the other way. we're gonna find out everything in due time. sit back and relax because soon enough you'll be pouring with tears over your stupid **** HRC in cuffs.I don't give a shit if she's executed live on Hannity, but :lol "illegal server"

[koriwhat]

I don't give a shit if she's executed live on Hannity, but :lol "illegal server"

yeah illegal server. what don't you get? not clear enough? want to dismiss it like the fbi did even after HRC and her bitch crew destroyed countless devices and shredded this and that? oh, but the fbi is such a upstanding agency that they would never ever just slap a bitch like HRC on the wrist, right?

[Pavlov]

yeah illegal server. what don't you get? not clear enough? want to dismiss it like the fbi did even after HRC and her bitch crew destroyed countless devices and shredded this and that? oh, but the fbi is such a upstanding agency that they would never ever just slap a bitch like HRC on the wrist, right?OK, I guess I'd need to see the "illegal server" statute to see when Hillary will be executed during primetime.

[koriwhat]

OK, I guess I'd need to see the "illegal server" statute to see when Hillary will be executed during primetime.

but there was no classified documents being transferred.... calling huma, calling weiner, calling hrc, calling...

[Pavlov]

but there was no classified documents being transferred.... calling huma, calling weiner, calling hrc, calling...Make your case. No need to be passive aggressive about it.

[koriwhat]

Make your case. No need to be passive aggressive about it.

you know the case already... no need to further explain it when you and the rest of the imbeciles want to just dismiss it anyhow just like biology other facts.

[Pavlov]

you know the case already... no need to further explain it when you and the rest of the imbeciles want to just dismiss it anyhow just like biology other facts.You have great difficulty staying on topic.

[koriwhat]

You have great difficulty staying on topic.

i'm shuffling like 10 threads right now player.

[Pavlov]

i'm shuffling like 10 threads right now player.And you're melting down in most of them.

[Mikeanaro]

you know the case already... no need to further explain it when you and the rest of the imbeciles want to just dismiss it anyhow just like biology other facts.
Libtards are like...

https://pics.me.me/hi-im-julian-assange-i-give-private-information-on-corporations-19997279.png

[dabom]

The same Assange that was in bed with trumpy jrs? :lmao

[dabom]

Twitter: You were in bed with trumpy jr

Assange: I don't remember

Trumpy jr releases the twitter messages. :lmao

[Pavlov]

:lol Mikeanaro's being publicly violated by Zuckerberg.

[Spurtacular]

:lol You still can't name one crime after all these months.

You're a failure.

Declining to do your bidding is one thing. Calling your own self a Hillary sperm shielder is another.

:rollin

[Spurtacular]

Libtards are like...

https://pics.me.me/hi-im-julian-assange-i-give-private-information-on-corporations-19997279.png

Liberals never came across a double standard they couldn't embrace, tbh.

[Pavlov]

Declining to do your bidding is one thing. Calling your own self a Hillary sperm shielder is another.

:rollinWhich makes your calling your own self a Hillary sperm shielder the ultimate self-checkmate and failure. :rollin

[Pavlov]

Liberals never came across a double standard they couldn't embrace, tbh.How is this a double standard, Spurtacular?

Explain.

[Spurtacular]

Which makes your calling your own self a Hillary sperm shielder the ultimate self-checkmate and failure. :rollin

Quote it. You've said this enough without any proof.

[Pavlov]

Quote it. You've said this enough without any proof.Is it important to you?

[Spurtacular]

Is it important to you?

I called you out and there's nothing you can do about it (other than create gimpy distractions), like a bitch. :lmao

[Pavlov]

I called you out and there's nothing you can do about it (other than create gimpy distractions), like a bitch. :lmaoYou honestly don't remember making up these little rules? :lmao

I'm calling you out. No one is this stupid.

Are you this stupid?

[Spurtacular]

You honestly don't remember making up these little rules? :lmao

I'm calling you out. No one is this stupid.

Are you this stupid?

If you think you got something, post it instead of pussyfooting around. You ain't got nothing but made-up nonsense. :lmao

[Spurtacular]

How is this a double standard, Spurtacular?

Explain.

How is it not, chump?

Explain.

[Pavlov]

If you think you got something, post it instead of pussyfooting around. You ain't got nothing but made-up nonsense. :lmaoAre you seriously demanding I repost your definition for everyone to see here?


How is it not, chump?

Explain.Zuckerberg enters into a legal agreement with Facebook users to share their information. Facebook users enter that agreement of their own free will and actively choose to use the Facebook service.

This is absolutely nothing like Assange.

At all.

You idiot.

[Spurtacular]

Are you seriously demanding I repost your definition for everyone to see here?


I couldn't demand you repost something that doesn't exist (at least what you have purported).

[Pavlov]

I couldn't demand you repost something that doesn't exist (at least what you have purported).Then what are you demanding here?

[Spurtacular]

Zuckerberg enters into a legal agreement with Facebook users to share their information. Facebook users enter that agreement of their own free will and actively choose to use the Facebook service.

This is absolutely nothing like Assange.

At all.

You idiot.

Facebook was a part of PRISM. Sorry; you lose.

[Spurtacular]

Then what are you demanding here?

Demanding nothing. I'm calling you out on making shit up.

[Pavlov]

Facebook was a part of PRISM. Sorry; you lose.How does that make Zuckerberg Assange?

Explain.

[Spurtacular]

How does that make Zuckerberg Assange?

Explain.

I never argued that. You're having a hard time keeping up.

[Spurtacular]

Demanding nothing. I'm calling you out on making shit up.

http://media.tumblr.com/d40c2851a151d6b41014f5f0dbaae5da/tumblr_mla3bwnCUp1s8dkxbo1_400.gif

[Pavlov]

I never argued that. You're having a hard time keeping up.Oh, what's the double standard then?

Explain.


http://media.tumblr.com/d40c2851a151d6b41014f5f0dbaae5da/tumblr_mla3bwnCUp1s8dkxbo1_400.gifYou couldn't name a Hillary crime so you're obviously semen shielding for her.


You couldn't name one (1) crime you think she committed. I can't either.

What are you trying to argue here?

If you think she committed a crime, just say which one. Simple.

If you can't, you must be sperm shielding for her. Simple.


I have sufficiently argued that you cannot even answer the question of whether Hillary likely committed a crime in Whitewater. Your sperm shielding is complete. Congrats, liberal cuck. :lmao

:lmao

[Spurtacular]

Oh, what's the double standard then?

Explain.


Villainizing a guy who delivers the truth for the common good vs. villains violating your privacy for money/power. I don't care if you call it a double standard or just outright idiocy, tbh.

[dabom]

Villainizing a guy who delivers the truth for the common good vs. villains violating your privacy for money/power. I don't care if you call it a double standard or just outright idiocy, tbh.

:lol

[Pavlov]

Villainizing a guy who delivers the truth for free vs. villains violating your privacy for money/power. I don't care if you call it a double standard or just outright idiocy, tbh.You already admitted Assange violated the privacy of hundreds of people by intentionally making their personal information public. :lol

[Spurtacular]

You already admitted Assange violated the privacy of hundreds of people by intentionally making their personal information public. :lol

Your government has already said that there is no expectation of privacy for anything done online. <Pat on the back> Maybe, you'll get the next one.

[Pavlov]

Your government has already said that there is no expectation of privacy for anything done online.Link?

Also explain how that is like Assange's intentionally releasing medical records with personal information.

[Spurtacular]

Link?

This is new to you?

[boutons_deux]

CNN strikes back, skewers Trash like a suckling pig

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2&v=skwcd9qw9IY

[Pavlov]

This is new to you?You didn't provide a link.

[Pavlov]

Looks like we might not hear from Chris for awhile.

955659120014749696

[hater]

Your government has already said that there is no expectation of privacy for anything done online. <Pat on the back> Maybe, you'll get the next one.

Yup nsa records everything

And before some idiot says but but they are the government, they already abused that power by wiretapping Donald

[Spurtacular]

You didn't provide a link.

This is new to you?

[Blake]

This is new to you?

Well it's not new for you to talk out of your ass.

[Spurtacular]

Well it's not new for you to talk out of your ass.

Don't act out, cuck.

[Pavlov]

This is new to you?You didn't provide a link.

[Spurtacular]

You didn't provide a link.

This is new to you?

[Pavlov]

This is new to you?So there's no link.

Typical Spurtacular making shit up.

[Spurtacular]

So there's no link.

Typical Spurtacular making shit up.

So, you've never heard of the govt. claiming there is no expectation of privacy online?

[Pavlov]

So, you've never heard of the govt. claiming there is no expectation of privacy online?Link?

[Chris]

Looks like we might not hear from Chris for awhile.

955659120014749696

How's that Russia collusion thingy going?

[Pavlov]

How's that Russia collusion thingy going?*ding*

[Spurtacular]

https://media.giphy.com/media/k5cnWfaRTPgze/giphy.gif

[Pavlov]

:cryYou never posted a link.

[Blake]

Don't act out, cuck.

Just clowning you for ass talking, dummy.

[Spurtacular]

You never posted a link.

Do you have a special need for it?

[Pavlov]

Do you have a special need for it?I know you can't produce one.

You got called out and shit yourself.

Again.

lol

[spurraider21]

So, you've never heard of the govt. claiming there is no expectation of privacy online?
no. that is just patently false

[Spurtacular]

http://www.gifbin.com/bin/1239023890_showoff-touchdown-fail.gif


https://78.media.tumblr.com/c64aa13141aad4368de95017955a208c/tumblr_oa5rygjpf81udh5n8o1_250.gif

https://www.theinternetpatrol.com/federal-court-holds-no-expectation-of-privacy-on-personal-computer/

[Pavlov]

https://www.theinternetpatrol.com/federal-court-holds-no-expectation-of-privacy-on-personal-computer/:lmao People using TOR for pedophilia don't have an expectation of privacy.

Do you expect privacy when you look for child pornography, Spurtacular?

[Blake]

:lmao People using TOR for pedophilia don't have an expectation of privacy.

Do you expect privacy when you look for child pornography, Spurtacular?

:lol :lol :lol

[Spurtacular]

:lmao People using TOR for pedophilia don't have an expectation of privacy.

Do you expect privacy when you look for child pornography, Spurtacular?


http://www.cybertelecom.org/security/expectation.htm


Individuals who retain a reasonable expectation of privacy (http://www.cybertelecom.org/security/bigbrother.htm#exp) in stored electronic information under their control may lose Fourth Amendment (http://www.cybertelecom.org/security/bigbrother.htm) protections when they relinquish that control to third parties.

“the Fourth Amendment does not prohibit the obtaining of information revealed to a third party and conveyed by him to Government authorities, even if the information is revealed on the assumption that it will be used only for a limited purpose and the confidence placed in the third party will not be betrayed." - United States v. Miller (http://www.cybertelecom.org/security/ecparef.htm#miller), 425 U.S. 435, 443 (1976)

“when an individual reveals private information to another, he assumes the risk that his confidant will reveal that information to the authorities, and if that occurs, the Fourth Amendment does not prohibit governmental use of that information. . . Once frustration of the original expectation of privacy occurs, the Fourth Amendment does not prohibit governmental use of the now non-private information.” - King v. U.S. , 55 F.3rd 1193 (6 th Cir. 1995)


Info net companies keep on you (even if privacy reasonably assumed) is fair game for the corps to give to to the government.

[Blake]

Do you expect privacy when you look for child pornography, Spurtacular?

[Pavlov]

http://www.cybertelecom.org/security/expectation.htm:lol may lose when they actively give it away

You didn't answer the question: Do you expect privacy when you look for child pornography, Spurtacular?

[Spurtacular]

:cry I don't know how PRISM was justified :cry

[spurraider21]

https://www.theinternetpatrol.com/federal-court-holds-no-expectation-of-privacy-on-personal-computer/
:lol read the actual case (i know it's hard). you don't have an expectation of privacy regarding your IP address (since this is shared with a third party, your service provider). that doesn't mean you lose an expectation of privacy just for being on the internet. they had to get a warrant before actually checking the content (the need for a warrant means there is an expectation of privacy)


Here, the NIT was programmed to collect very limited information. Like the pen register in Smith that only captured the numbers dialed, 442 U.S. at 742, 99 S.Ct. 2577, the NIT only obtained identifying information; it did not cross the line between collecting addressing information and gathering the contents of any suspect's computer. Cf. Forrester, 512 F.3d at 510. Indeed, the Government obtained a traditional residential search warrant before searching the computer's contents in this case. Plus, Defendant lacked any expectation of privacy in the main piece of information the NIT allowed the FBI to gather — his IP address. E.g., Michaud, 2016 WL 337263, at *7. Additionally, while the Government could have deployed the NIT as soon as a user logged into Playpen, SA Alfin testified that in this particular case, the FBI took the extra step of not deploying the NIT until after the suspect actually accessed child pornography. These facts support the conclusion that the NIT's deployment does not represent a prohibited search under the Fourth Amendment. Cf. Forrester, 512 F.3d at 511.
Additionally, like the employee in Simons who was put on notice that his computer was not entirely private, 206 F.3d at 398, Defendant here should have been aware that by going on Tor to access Playpen, he diminished his expectation of privacy.

https://www.leagle.com/decision/inadvfdco170425000208

[Pavlov]

:crymuh child porn:cry

[Spurtacular]

I just looked at the thesis statement for the first link. You throw in criminal activity, that's throwing a wrench into it. Look up PRISM and how it was justified by the gov. and validated by judges. The gov was accessing loads of personal information in secret on the basis that internet info was not considered private.

[Pavlov]

I just looked at the thesis statement for the first link. You throw in criminal activity, that's throwing a wrench into it. Look up PRISM and how it was justified by the gov. and validated by judges. The gov was accessing loads of personal information in secret on the basis that internet info was not considered private.You're going to have to prove that.

All you've said so far is you expected your TOR child porn searches to be private.

[spurraider21]

Your government has already said that there is no expectation of privacy for anything done online. <Pat on the back> Maybe, you'll get the next one.


Info net companies keep on you (even if privacy reasonably assumed) is fair game for the corps to give to to the government.
except for the bolded part, this statement is true. information that you willingly share with a 3rd party is fair game. so your IP address is fair game. if it is willingly shared as part of the terms of service or something, then there is no reasonable expectation of privacy, so a warrant wouldn't be needed.

pro tip: any time a warrant is acquired, that means there was a reasonable expectation of privacy, just like the case you cited to (incorrectly)

that's VERY different than the first post quoted above :lol "anything done online"

[spurraider21]

I just looked at the thesis statement for the first link.
and thats the problem. telephone game at work. the original source is always preferred. otherwise i can always quote to some blog of some guy just saying something he read about