:( #MePoo

[Spurtacular]

I'm not trying to prove anything. I am asking you how you arrived at your conclusion.

You are terrified into submission because I asked you what you think. You proved that all on your own.

And that doesn't matter if you aren't trying to prove anything. You've already conceded that you think Bill Clinton is a sexual predator.

I'll spell this out. You always lose these b/c it's like a chess game, and I already know what you're likely trying to prove (even though you're too cowardly to admit it). You can take your L (yet another one) the short way or the long way. It doesn't matter to me.

[Winehole23]

winning online is very important to the Cuck Whisperer

[Pavlov]

And that doesn't matter if you aren't trying to prove anything. You've already conceded that you think Bill Clinton is a sexual predator.

I'll spell this out. You always lose these b/c it's like a chess game, and I already know what you're likely trying to prove (even though you're too cowardly to admit it). You can take your L (yet another one) the short way or the long way. It doesn't matter to me.:lol declaring victory.

You've been terrified into submission because I asked you what you think -- and you'll never come out of it.

Sorry I hurt you so badly because of what you thought I was doing. I didn't mean to.

[Pavlov]

winning online is very important to the Cuck WhispererI can only conclude he considers saying what he actually thinks is a sure way to lose.

Which is the funniest thing I've seen here in a long time tbh.

[Spurtacular]

:lol declaring victory.

You've been terrified into submission because I asked you what you think -- and you'll never come out of it.

Sorry I hurt you so badly because of what you thought I was doing. I didn't mean to.

What victory? You've spent how many post in a row throwing a tantrum and demanding I deconstruct a conclusion you've already made. If that's not an L for you, it's because you don't hold yourself to a standard. :lol

[Pavlov]

What victory? You've spent how many post in a row throwing a tantrum and demanding I deconstruct a conclusion you've already made. If that's not an L for you, it's because you don't hold yourself to a standard. :lolYou declared victory after shutting yourself down because you are terrified to lose.

lol

[Spurtacular]

You declared victory after shutting yourself down because you are terrified to lose.

lol

I've called you out on your L's. That's not necessarily the same as declaring victory. Stop playing for L's if that bothers you.

[Pavlov]

I've called you out on your L's. That's not necessarily the same as declaring victory. Stop playing for L's if that bothers you.Declaring victories, declaring losses -- none of it matters since you proved you're terrified of discussing your own topic in your own thread.

All I had to do was ask you what you think.

lol

[Spurtacular]

Declaring victories, declaring losses -- none of it matters since you proved you're terrified of discussing your own topic in your own thread.

All I had to do was ask you what you think.

lol

If you put the gun to your own damn head is it my victory? :lmao

[Pavlov]

If you put the gun to your own damn head is it my victory? :lmaoI asked you what you think about your OP in your thread and you shut down.

If you're counting everything as a win or a loss -- what do you consider that to be for yourself?

[Spurminator]

Sure thing.
Aunt Lydia was cast with no thought on attractiveness.

The Aunt Lydia comment was not about Aunt Lydia's looks, aside from perhaps their similar appearance.

More importantly, they're both cuɳts.

[Spurtacular]

I asked you what you think about your OP in your thread and you shut down.

If you're counting everything as a win or a loss -- what do you consider that to be for yourself?

Blatant false narrative. Par.

You asked me to deconstruct a conclusion you already relayed. When asked for a reason to do so, you stated you could give none. You then threw a tantrum. It doesn't get much more L than that.

[Pavlov]

Blatant false narrative. Par.

You asked me to deconstruct a conclusion you already relayed. When asked for a reason to do so, you stated you could give none. You then threw a tantrum. It doesn't get much more L than that.No, I asked you what you thought.

You shut down. You're still shut down. You will never talk about it again.

Out of fear.

In your accounting, that has to be a huge loss for you. And you're going to be whining about it for awhile.

lol

[Spurtacular]

No, I asked you what you thought.

You shut down. You're still shut down. You will never talk about it again.

Out of fear.

In your accounting, that has to be a huge loss for you. And you're going to be whining about it for awhile.

lol

You're reverting to vague declarations followed by blather in a vain attempt to mask your L's. Classic Chump. :lol

[Reck]

You're reverting to vague declarations followed by blather in a vain attempt to mask your L's. Classic Chump. :lol

Dont you have homo threads to bump derp? :lmao

[Pavlov]

You're reverting to vague declarations followed by blather in a vain attempt to mask your L's. Classic Chump. :lol
Vague declarations?

I said I asked you what you thought-- which is what I did.

I said you shut down-- which is what you did.

I said you are going to whine about it for a long time-- which is what you are now doing.

lol

[Spurtacular]

Dont you have homo threads to bump derp? :lmao

Go ahead and go in there and write a review on your homo movie, bro. You won't cos you're too ashamed of your homosexuality.

:lmao Today's proud progressive.

[Spurtacular]

Vague declarations?

I said I asked you what you thought-- which is what I did.

I said you shut down-- which is what you did.

I said you are going to whine about it for a long time-- which is what you are now doing.

lol

More vague declarations in the hopes of drying up all those L juices. :lmao

[Pavlov]

More vague declarations in the hopes of drying up all those L juices. :lmaoI did ask you what you thought. You read the questions. You shut down.

Now claiming amnesia is your new tactic. To your accounting, that has to be another huge loss for you.

lol

And now you'll keep whining about it.

[Spurtacular]

I did ask you what you thought. You read the questions. You shut down.

Now claiming amnesia is your new tactic. To your accounting, that has to be another huge loss for you.

lol

And now you'll keep whining about it.

:lol Hoping that dumbing matters down will erase your L. :lmao

[Pavlov]

:lol Hoping that dumbing matters down will erase your L. :lmaoYou're still whining about your shutting down.

You will continue to do so.

lol

[Reck]

Go ahead and go in there and write a review on your homo movie, bro. You won't cos you're too ashamed of your homosexuality.

:lmao Today's proud progressive.

So I'm going to give a review of a movie I have not seeing or have any interest in?

Why should I do that? Why are you so interested in those kind of movies? Surely you are exploring your options. You might have better luck trying IMDB.

[Pavlov]

So I'm going to give a review of a movie I have not seeing or have any interest in?

Why should I do that? Why are you so interested in those kind of movies? Surely you are exploring your options. You might have better luck trying IMDB.I think in the course of constantly crying out for men, Closetacular is trying to say that you can't have a political ideology unless you watch and love certain movies.

It's really quite stupid.

[Spurtacular]

So I'm going to give a review of a movie I have not seeing or have any interest in?

Why should I do that? Why are you so interested in those kind of movies? Surely you are exploring your options. You might have better luck trying IMDB.

No. You're supposed to prove one of two if not both:

1. You don't give a sh** about your uber progressive culture.
2. That you're too closeted a homosexual to embrace the seminal homo movie of the decade.

[Reck]

No. You're supposed to prove one of two if not both:

1. You don't give a sh** about your uber progressive culture.
2. That you're too closeted a homosexual to embrace the seminal homo movie of the decade.

That's stupid logic. But then again, you are call derp for a reason.

A movie about the gays doesn't mean that all gays must love said gay movie. What kind of ass backwards thinking is that?

You dont have to be a conservative or a liberal to enjoy random and certain movie genres.

Let me guess, derp. According to your logic you have seen Infinity War a half dozen times to prove you're straight and a badass. Does that sound about right?

[Spurtacular]

I think in the course of constantly crying out for men, Closetacular is trying to say that you can't have a political ideology unless you watch and love certain movies.

It's really quite stupid.

Name one ST progressive who has even watched the seminal homo movie of the decade.

[Spurtacular]

That's stupid logic. But then again, you are call derp for a reason.

A movie about the gays doesn't mean that all gays must love said gay movie. What kind of ass backwards thinking is that?

You dont have to be a conservative or a liberal to enjoy random and certain movie genres.

Let me guess, derp. According to your logic you have seen Infinity War a half dozen times to prove you're straight and a badass. Does that sound about right?

I called out the whole class of progressive dolts; this is not even merely anecdotal. None of you faggots could give a fuck about your seminal homo movie.

[Pavlov]

Name one ST progressive who has even watched the seminal homo movie of the decade.Why is it required to view and love a movie?

Explain your logic.

[Spurtacular]

Why is it required to view and love a movie?

Explain your logic.

Why don't you give a fuck about the values and culture you espouse? That's a good question, but not really. We all know you're full of sh** and that the gays are just cogs in your coalition.

[Pavlov]

Why don't you give a fuck about the values and culture you espouse? That's a good question, but not really. We all know you're full of sh** and that the gays are just cogs in your coalition.
You didn't explain your logic.

This is your rant and your requirement.

Explain it.

[Spurtacular]

You didn't explain your logic.

This is your rant and your requirement.

Explain it.

Go watch your movie. Walk the walk instead of merely talking the talk.

[Pavlov]

Go watch your movie. Walk the walk instead of merely talking the talk.Why is it required?

What movies are you required to watch and love?

Explain your logic.

[Spurtacular]

:cry Don't ask, don't watch :cry

:lmao

[Pavlov]

:lmaoFake quote.

I asked you what you thought again and you shut down again. According to your rules, it's another huge loss for you in your own thread.

Time for you to whine about it some more.

lol

[Spurtacular]

:cry My actions don't matter. :cry

:lmao

[Pavlov]

:lmaoFake quote.

You continue whining.

Your loss, according to you.

lol

[Spurtacular]

Fake quote.

You continue whining.

Your loss, according to you.

lol

You're not quite to tantrum mode yet. You're just brooding. :lol

Tell me why you haven't seen the movie; too homophobic?

[Pavlov]

You're not quite to tantrum mode yet. You're just brooding. :lol

Tell me why you haven't seen the movie; too homophobic?Sorry, you haven't told me why it is required than anyone watch and love a movie at all.

I'm waiting for that.

Are you going to explain?

I'm going to say you aren't and continue to whine about your self-imposed and self-defined losses.

[Spurtacular]

Sorry, you haven't told me why it is required than anyone watch and love a movie at all.

I'm waiting for that.

Are you going to explain?

I'm going to say you aren't and continue to whine about your self-imposed and self-defined losses.

I've never claimed not watching the movie was the disease, just the symptom; thus "required" is your 'lil spin. Par.

So, why haven't you watched the movie; too homophobic?

Oh, and :lol at this the bolded brooding.

[Pavlov]

I've never claimed not watching the movie was the disease, just the symptom; thus "required" is your 'lil spin. Par.

So, why haven't you watched the movie; too homophobic?

Oh, and :lol at this the bolded brooding.So it's not required?

Cool.

Kind of destroys any argument you are trying to make.

By your definition, that's a loss for you.

[Spurtacular]

So it's not required?

Cool.

Kind of destroys any argument you are trying to make.

By your definition, that's a loss for you.

You're unhinged. :lol

So, why haven't you watched the movie; too homophobic?

[Pavlov]

You're unhinged. :lol

So, why haven't you watched the movie; too homophobic?No particular reason. I don't watch every movie that has ever been made.

Did you like it?

[Spurtacular]

No particular reason. I don't watch every movie that has ever been made.

Did you like it?

I think there is a reason. Search your feelings. :lol

I do like that the movie exposes phony modern progressives like you.

[Pavlov]

I think there is a reason. Search your feelings. :lol

I do like that the movie exposes phony modern progressives like you.You just said I wasn't required to watch it to have a political viewpoint.

Pick a lane.

[Spurtacular]

You just said I wasn't required to watch it to have a political viewpoint.

Pick a lane.

That's not what I said.

False narrative. Par. :lol

[Pavlov]

That's not what I said.

False narrative. Par. :lolSo your saying you believe there's no requirement to see and love any movie to support progressive policies, correct?

[pgardn]

The Aunt Lydia comment was not about Aunt Lydia's looks, aside from perhaps their similar appearance.

More importantly, they're both cuɳts.

So you are a male telling me this.
And from females I’m getting you are wrong.

New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman, who was honored during the dinner for her reporting, said Sanders' refusal to walk out amid the barbs was "impressive."
"That @PressSec sat and absorbed intense criticism of her physical appearance, her job performance, and so forth, instead of walking out, on national television, was impressive," Haberman wrote on Twitter (https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/990428993542414336).


So this is a NYTimes reporter and CNN analyst. Your opinion is not necessarily correct. I had this told to me and explained. And there’s more than just Haberman who was right there. Others that were not present said worse. So do I take the female reaction or yours. This puts the Trump women voters in an interesting bind as well.


And I have other questions.
I would like to get to those after Spartacus declares winners and losers. It deals with males in general not getting this movement, not just conservatives Trumpeters. So far based on what I have read here this appears a valid argument I would like more discussion on.

[Spurtacular]

So your saying you believe there's no requirement to see and love any movie to support progressive policies, correct?

I'm saying that if the whole lot of ST progressives can't be bothered to watch the seminal gay movie of the decade, then that speaks volumes about your phoniness as a group. You are the one simple-mindedly trying to call that an individual "requirement."

[Spurminator]

So you are a male telling me this.
And from females I’m getting you are wrong.

New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman, who was honored during the dinner for her reporting, said Sanders' refusal to walk out amid the barbs was "impressive."
"That @PressSec sat and absorbed intense criticism of her physical appearance, her job performance, and so forth, instead of walking out, on national television, was impressive," Haberman wrote on Twitter (https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/990428993542414336).

So this is a NYTimes reporter and CNN analyst. Your opinion is not necessarily correct. I had this told to me and explained. And there’s more than just Haberman who was right there. Others that were not present said worse. So do I take the female reaction or yours. This puts the Trump women voters in an interesting bind as well.


You have handpicked females that share your opinion. Furthermore, as current and future invitees of the WHCD, people like Maggie Haberman have incentive to defend SHS. Maybe you should check the comments on her tweet for alternate female opinions, if that's going to be your sole criterion for interpreting the insults.

Or you could just read Wolf's comments with any understanding of "smoky eye" and A Handmaid's Tale and form your own opinion.

[Pavlov]

I'm saying that if the whole lot of ST progressives can't be bothered to watch the seminal gay movie of the decade, then that speaks volumes about your phoniness as a group. You are the one simple-mindedly trying to call that an individual "requirement."To be clear, you are saying you believe there's no requirement to see and love any movie to support progressive policies, correct?

A simple yes or no will make your thoughts crystal clear.

[Spurtacular]

To be clear, you are saying you believe there's no requirement to see and love any movie to support progressive policies, correct?

A simple yes or no will make your thoughts crystal clear.

When is there ever a "requirement" for a person with freedom of choice to watch a movie? Your question is stupid on its face.

[pgardn]

You have handpicked females that share your opinion. Furthermore, as current and future invitees of the WHCD, people like Maggie Haberman have incentive to defend SHS. Maybe you should check the comments on her tweet for alternate female opinions, if that's going to be your sole criterion for interpreting the insults.

Or you could just read Wolf's comments with any understanding of "smoky eye" and A Handmaid's Tale and form your own opinion.

I watched the thing with my wife who hand picked my opinion. Because I did not get it.
We rewatched it. Her friends have the same opinion. My nieces are more bold faced about it but they are teenagers but with very good points.

I think just reading it does not quite give the same effect as facial expression and speech patterns. No?

What does your wife say?

Inthink I actually get their arguments about males inability to understand AND that females as a whole are calling each other Uncle Toms. So in effect a coherent stance would be nice as this falls right into the lap of the conservative male argument that they are being bashed by unhinged incoherence.

[Pavlov]

When is there ever a "requirement" for a person with freedom of choice to watch a movie? Your question is stupid on its face.Which is why your trying to make watching and loving this movie a requirement to support progressive policies is so stupid.

But just for the record, put this stupidity to rest once and for all-- you are saying you believe there's no requirement to see and love any movie to support progressive policies, correct?

A simple yes or no will make your thoughts crystal clear.

[Spurtacular]

Which is why your trying to make watching and loving this movie a requirement to support progressive policies is so stupid.

But just for the record, put this stupidity to rest once and for all-- you are saying you believe there's no requirement to see and love any movie to support progressive policies, correct?

A simple yes or no will make your thoughts crystal clear.

Making up false narratives won't get you the illusive W you seek.

[Pavlov]

Making up false narratives won't get you the illusive W you seek.You're stalling.

For the record, put this stupidity to rest once and for all-- you are saying you believe there's no requirement to see and love any movie to support progressive policies, correct?

A simple yes or no will make your thoughts crystal clear.

[Spurtacular]

You're stalling.

For the record, put this stupidity to rest once and for all-- you are saying you believe there's no requirement to see and love any movie to support progressive policies, correct?

A simple yes or no will make your thoughts crystal clear.

I answered your question / false narrative in a rhetorical format. Butt posting won't get you the W you desperately want.

[Pavlov]

I answered your question / false narrative in a rhetorical format.Yeah, that wasn't definitive at all. This will be, so no need to stall anymore.

You are saying you believe there's no requirement to see and love any movie to support progressive policies, correct?

A simple yes or no will make your thoughts crystal clear. Any continued stalling will be a loss for you by your own definition.

[Spurminator]

What does your wife say?

She thinks everyone's being a whiny bitch about it, and she also thinks Sanders is a cuɳt for whom any insult should be fair game.

[Spurtacular]

Yeah, that wasn't definitive at all. This will be, so no need to stall anymore.

You are saying you believe there's no requirement to see and love any movie to support progressive policies, correct?

A simple yes or no will make your thoughts crystal clear. Any continued stalling will be a loss for you by your own definition.

It was pretty clear to anyone with even low-level deductive reasoning skills.

But let's get back to "no particular" reason you'd watch the political groundbreaking movie for progressives. :lol That you and all the other progressives on here couldn't be bothered to show an interest.

[pgardn]

She thinks everyone's being a whiny bitch about it, and she also thinks Sanders is a cuɳt for whom any insult should be fair game.

My wife and especially nieces don't see it that way at all.
My neices really not knowing about Sanders and especially, totally vehement about the inappropriateness.
The words don't hurt thing being especially wrong. The stuff they teach these kids today... huh?

[Pavlov]

It was pretty clear to anyone with even low-level deductive reasoning skills.

But let's get back to "no particular" reason you'd watch the political groundbreaking movie for progressives. :lol That you and all the other progressives on here couldn't be bothered to show an interest.So you do think it's required.

OK.

That's just incredibly stupid of you to think so, but I'm glad you made it clear you do think it is required.

Thanks.

[Pavlov]

My wife and especially nieces don't see it that way at all.
My neices really not knowing about Sanders and especially, totally vehement about the inappropriateness.
The words don't hurt thing being especially wrong. The stuff they teach these kids today... huh?Do they know what a roast is?

[Spurtacular]

So you do think it's required.

OK.

That's just incredibly stupid of you to think so, but I'm glad you made it clear you do think it is required.

Thanks.

http://www.numbersalive.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/0_Final_HelloNumbers-copy.jpg

:lol The number of times I've told you it is "required."

[Pavlov]

http://www.numbersalive.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/0_Final_HelloNumbers-copy.jpg

:lol The number of times I've told you it is "required."You are saying you believe there's no requirement to see and love any movie to support progressive policies, correct?

A simple yes or no will make your thoughts crystal clear.

Or keep whining.

lol

[Spurtacular]

You are saying you believe there's no requirement to see and love any movie to support progressive policies, correct?

A simple yes or no will make your thoughts crystal clear.

Or keep whining.

lol

I'm saying you've manufactured a narrative and then butt posted about it. Par.

[Pavlov]

I'm saying you've manufactured a narrative and then butt posted about it. Par.
So you are saying you believe there's no requirement to see and love any movie to support progressive policies, correct?

A simple yes or no will make your thoughts crystal clear.

Or keep whining.

lol

[pgardn]

Do they know what a roast is?

Yes, but really no. They are too young. Words hurt mantra, bullying, etc...

The adults do.
I think the fact that Sanders was right there and took it was looked upon as noble.
But, new info enters the picture in my world.

Sister-in-law and her group thinks the Smokey eye thing was only a reference to makeup application. And the Handmaiden’s tale absolutely personality driven. But they absolutely hate Sanders. Kind of what Spurminator said but even more vehement in favor of the roast of a liar. Oh yes, and it’s ok if a woman makes “fun” of another woman. So this somewhat ubiquitous female movement appears to be shredded into factions just like males as would be expected.

Oh also.
Some females just go along with the family ideology merely to comply, usually the older females.

This all makes Thanksgiving a joy.

I just don’t keep up well according to almost all. So that’s one bit of agreement even though the females don’t agree. The males are mostly apolitical except for myself. And totally outnumbered by females.

[Spurtacular]

So you are saying you believe there's no requirement to see and love any movie to support progressive policies, correct?

A simple yes or no will make your thoughts crystal clear.

Or keep whining.

lol

Your #SpecialNeeds are acting up.

Why would you say that you and no other ST progressive has lent your support to the gay community by watching this movie? Does it gross you out to see two dudes being affectionate towards one another?

[Spurtacular]

Biden drawback: the overly familiar mannerisms that seem terribly out of place in the #MeToo era.

:lol "The #MePoo Era"

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/04/16/joe-biden-2020-front-runner-problem-217995

[Winehole23]

Not only that, it's a stretch to suggest her appearance was even being mocked.so much for comforting the afflicted and afflicting the comfortable.

you'd think public officials, their lick-spittles and their stenographers would have thicker skins: apparently humor flays them.

[Pavlov]

Your #SpecialNeeds are acting up.

Why would you say that you and no other ST progressive has lent your support to the gay community by watching this movie? Does it gross you out to see two dudes being affectionate towards one another?So now it's required again.

lol

[Pavlov]

Yes, but really no. They are too young. Words hurt mantra, bullying, etc...

The adults do.
I think the fact that Sanders was right there and took it was looked upon as noble.
But, new info enters the picture in my world.

Sister-in-law and her group thinks the Smokey eye thing was only a reference to makeup application. And the Handmaiden’s tale absolutely personality driven. But they absolutely hate Sanders. Kind of what Spurminator said but even more vehement in favor of the roast of a liar. Oh yes, and it’s ok if a woman makes “fun” of another woman. So this somewhat ubiquitous female movement appears to be shredded into factions just like males as would be expected.

Oh also.
Some females just go along with the family ideology merely to comply, usually the older females.

This all makes Thanksgiving a joy.

I just don’t keep up well according to almost all. So that’s one bit of agreement even though the females don’t agree. The males are mostly apolitical except for myself. And totally outnumbered by females.Right. I'll consider your sample size and possible biases. Thanks.

[Spurtacular]

So now it's required again.

lol

Why would you say that you and no other ST progressive has lent your support to the gay community by watching this movie? Does it gross you out to see two dudes being affectionate towards one another?

[Pavlov]

Why would you say that you and no other ST progressive has lent your support to the gay community by watching this movie? Does it gross you out to see two dudes being affectionate towards one another?So now it's required again.

lol

Tell us all the gay movies you've seen that we are now required to see.

Make a list.

[pgardn]

Right. I'll consider your sample size and possible biases. Thanks.


You found an an official poll?
I was throwing out an opinion based on reaction around me and some reads.
This happens on open discussion boards I was thinking.

[pgardn]

Roasts are very telling. They clearly have boundaries but they are very flexible and possibly dependent on which team you root for and your particular cause. Subtly of delivery, content, audience... It’s an interesting view on rationales presented to explain behavior.This whole movement associated with females, age, was given a good pin prick.

This is also interesting, after 6 months of controversy we have this:

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/04/28/lisa-bloom-harvey-weinstein-gloria-allred-me-too-218011

[Spurtacular]

So now it's required again.

lol

Tell us all the gay movies you've seen that we are now required to see.

Make a list.

Yes, we are back to your false narrative about requirements.

But we are still discussing your apparent homophobic-based aversion to watching certain movies. What is at the root of it?

[boutons_deux]

People being upset about SHS being brutally roasted don't know she was there as proxy for the dick-less Trash?

Same people are not upset by the 100s if not 1000s of nasty insults and slanderous likes Trash has spewed? not upset about him mocking a disabled person? he and his supporter lied that the wasn't mocking,

but his recent admission that he finds the para-olympics hard to watch confirms that he, disabled by obesity, looks down on disabled people.

SHS is a piece of shit, and she knows it, she took the job as lying press secretary for a pathological liar.

[boutons_deux]

top conservative gives his shitty take on silencing the press

https://twitter.com/mschlapp/status/990937007286312960?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftheoldreader.com%2Fposts%2Fa ll

[Pavlov]

You found an an official poll?
I was throwing out an opinion based on reaction around me and some reads.
This happens on open discussion boards I was thinking.That sounded pissier than I wanted it to. Sorry.

[Pavlov]

Yes, we are back to your false narrative about requirements.So it's not required? Great.

But we are still discussing your apparent homophobic-based aversion to watching certain movies. What is at the root of it?[/QUOTE]Give me the list of movies you watched that you think progressives have to watch to be considered progressive but are somehow not required to watch.

List all of them and explain why each one must be watched but not required.

[Spurtacular]

:cry I'm a homophobe :cry

Four academy award nominations and the seminal homosexual movie of the decade. I get that you don't care about your cogs when it doesn't come to their votes though.

[Pavlov]

Four academy award nominations and the seminal homosexual movie of the decade. I get that you don't care about your cogs when it doesn't come to their votes though.fake quote white flag and now it's required again according to you.

Give me the list of movies you watched that you think progressives have to watch to be considered progressive.

List all of them and explain why each one must be watched.

[Spurtacular]

:cry

Four academy award nominations and the seminal homosexual movie of the decade. I get that you don't care about your cogs when it doesn't come to their votes though.

[Pavlov]

Four academy award nominations and the seminal homosexual movie of the decade. I get that you don't care about your cogs when it doesn't come to their votes though.
fake quote white flag and now it's required again according to you.

Give me the list of movies you watched that you think progressives have to watch to be considered progressive.

Also list the movies you are required to watch and love.

Or keep whining.

lol

List all of them and explain why each one must be watched.

[Spurtacular]

fake quote white flag and now it's required again according to you.

Give me the list of movies you watched that you think progressives have to watch to be considered progressive.

Also list the movies you are required to watch and love.

Or keep whining.

lol

List all of them and explain why each one must be watched.

Why does there need to be a list? It's clear that you progressive homophobes will be staying away from all the gay flicks.

[pgardn]

That sounded pissier than I wanted it to. Sorry.

no problemo

Just something that interests me. When these movements start they have ready made cracks and infighting. It does not mean the movement is without merit imo. It’s just interesting to note examples that never occurred to me as a male.

[Pavlov]

Why does there need to be a list? It's clear that you progressive homophobes will be staying away from all the gay flicks.

List all the gay flicks you have seen that are required watching for progressives.

[Spurtacular]

List all the gay flicks you have seen that are required watching for progressives.

Why would it matter what I've seen?

[Spurtacular]

That sounded pissier than I wanted it to. Sorry.

Way to apologize for over-pissing. Seems fitting that that would be the crux of the matter and to a chumpette the one time you ever apologized for anything. :lmao

[Pavlov]

Why would it matter what I've seen?So you can't even say whether anyone should watch any of these movies.

Great. You have no basis to argue anything here.

lol

[Spurtacular]

So you can't even say whether anyone should watch any of these movies.

Great. You have no basis to argue anything here.

lol

Is this seriously your response to "Why would it matter what I've seen?"

Maybe, you should come up with something better.

[Spurtacular]

More good stuff.

https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/four-women-accuse-new-yorks-attorney-general-of-physical-abuse

[Spurtacular]

This #MePoo victimizer is the gift that keeps on giving...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5700455/Hillary-Clinton-spotted-wearing-supposed-brace.html

[Pavlov]

Is this seriously your response to "Why would it matter what I've seen?"

Maybe, you should come up with something better.
How can you demand others see movies you haven't seen

[DMX7]

More good stuff.

https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/four-women-accuse-new-yorks-attorney-general-of-physical-abuse

You don't make any sense. You mock the women who come forward with the "#mepoo" hashtag but now you're celebrating an instance when they do.

[Spurtacular]

You don't make any sense. You mock the women who come forward with the "#mepoo" hashtag but now you're celebrating an instance when they do.

Nice assuming, bro.

This is a guy trumpeting #mepoo loudly being the victimizer. Funny how often that happems. I intuitively called the dripping sanctimony from the start.

[Spurtacular]

How can you demand others see movies you haven't seen

I'll let you know whenever I start demanding someone watch a movie.

[Pavlov]

I'll let you know whenever I start demanding someone watch a movie.They're required, according to you.

[AaronY]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dcne6bGXUAEyO-R?format=jpg

[Spurtacular]

They're required, according to you.

Let's reverse engineer this. Why would I say they're required?

[Pavlov]

Let's reverse engineer this. Why would I say they're required?To make up a stupid message board talking point accusing people of not liking gays for some reason.

[Spurtacular]

To make up a stupid message board talking point accusing people of not liking gays for some reason.

You certainly don't like being called out on your apathy towards the gays.

[Pavlov]

You certainly don't like being called out on your apathy towards the gays.You certainly tried to make watching movies a requirement.

lol

[Spurtacular]

You certainly tried to make watching movies a requirement.

lol

I know you struggle with English. I called it a symptom of your disregard; and it indeed is.

[Pavlov]

I know you struggle with English. I called it a symptom of your disregard; and it indeed is.So it's required to watch the movies, according to you.

lol

[Spurtacular]

So it's required to watch the movies, according to you.

lol

Own your apparent apathy towards the gays; or do you have anything you can report to show this isn't the case.

[Pavlov]

Own your apparent apathy towards the gays; or do you have anything you can report to show this isn't the case.lol "apparent"

The only evidence you have of apathy is not watching a movie.

So to you it's required.

lol

[Spurtacular]

lol "apparent"

The only evidence you have of apathy is not watching a movie.

So to you it's required.

lol

You're part of a group that wants nothing to do with gay culture. You should just own that.

[Pavlov]

You're part of a group that wants nothing to do with gay culture. You should just own that.The only evidence you have of apathy is not watching a movie.

[Spurtacular]

The only evidence you have of apathy is not watching a movie.

What evidence do you have that you've embraced gay culture?

[Pavlov]

What evidence do you have that you've embraced gay culture?What else is required, according to you?

[Spurtacular]

What else is required, according to you?

So, you have no evidence that you've embraced gay culture. Expected.

[Pavlov]

So, you have no evidence that you've embraced gay culture. Expected.Let me know what's required, since you're the expert and arbiter of all things homosexual.

This is your jihad.

[Spurtacular]

Let me know what's required, since you're the expert and arbiter of all things homosexual.

This is your jihad.

You're mad that I ascertained that you likely don't hold gay culture in any high esteem. I am giving you the chance to prove me wrong, but you cannot do so.

[Fabbs]

cmon you two get a room. I was wanting to read the latest on MePoo.
https://a1.r9cdn.net/rimg/himg/11/4a/89/ice-26027-photo.aspx_did=2692_brochureid=26027_publicid=8441 585_instanceid=7-image.jpg?width=500&height=350&crop=true

[Pavlov]

You're mad that I ascertained that you likely don't hold gay culture in any high esteem. I am giving you the chance to prove me wrong, but you cannot do so.I am giving you a chance to list all the requirements since this is your jihad.

I'll let you know if I meet any of them.

Thanks in advance.

[Pavlov]

cmon you two get a room. I was wanting to read the latest on MePoo.
https://a1.r9cdn.net/rimg/himg/11/4a/89/ice-26027-photo.aspx_did=2692_brochureid=26027_publicid=8441 585_instanceid=7-image.jpg?width=500&height=350&crop=true#kittylitterralphie

[Spurtacular]

I am giving you a chance to list all the requirements since this is your jihad.

I'll let you know if I meet any of them.

Thanks in advance.

You would obviously need a list, as you don't actively do anything to gain an appreciation for gay culture.

[Pavlov]

You would obviously need a list, as you don't actively do anything to gain an appreciation for gay culture.Like what?

Give examples.

So far you have watching one (1) movie.

[Spurtacular]

Like what?

Give examples.

So far you have watching one (1) movie.

It's okay to admit that the gay culture doesn't move your needle, dude.

[Pavlov]

It's okay to admit that the gay culture doesn't move your needle, dude.We don't know that yet. You have to present your list, then we'll know.

Let's see it. You can be the judge; they're your requirements.

[Spurtacular]

We don't know that yet. You have to present your list, then we'll know.

Let's see it. You can be the judge; they're your requirements.

I don't have a list. Tell us how you value gay culture from a non-political standpoint.

[Pavlov]

I don't have a list.Of course you do.

It has one item so far.

What are the others?

Or is that the only one?

[Spurtacular]

Of course you do.

It has one item so far.

What are the others?

Or is that the only one?

You earned a zero either way then. Fail. Par.

[Pavlov]

You earned a zero either way then. Fail. Par.Is that the only requirement on your list?

Come on. You have to have more than that.

Let's see some more.

[Spurtacular]

Is that the only requirement on your list?

Come on. You have to have more than that.

Let's see some more.

I called you out; you haven't done anything to refute my claim. I can live with that.

[Pavlov]

I called you out; you haven't done anything to refute my claim. I can live with that.Called me out on what? Not seeing a movie.

:lol

[Spurtacular]

Called me out on what? Not seeing a movie.

:lol

On only seeing the gays as a political cog. You've done nothing to disprove that.

[Pavlov]

On only seeing the gays as a political cog. You've done nothing to disprove that.These are your requirements. Save us time and list them all and I'll let you know if I meet any of them. There's no need for me to guess what is relevant to you. You declared yourself the sole arbiter of homosexual support, so let's see that list.

[Fabbs]

#kittylitterralphie
"Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery."
That having been said Chumplov, you're not me. Don't try so hard to be.

[Pavlov]

"Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery."
That having been said Chumplov, you're not me. Don't try so hard to be.:lol I'm mocking you, not imitating you.

Damn, you're stupid.

[Fabbs]

Chumplov triggered.
and backpedaling. :lol

[Spurtacular]

These are your requirements. Save us time and list them all and I'll let you know if I meet any of them. There's no need for me to guess what is relevant to you. You declared yourself the sole arbiter of homosexual support, so let's see that list.

If I'm the sole arbiter, then why do you think you get to demand a list? :lol

[Pavlov]

Chumplov triggered.
and backpedaling. :lol:lol Fabbs still trying. Break out the projection shtick next.


If I'm the sole arbiter, then why do you think you get to demand a list? :lolWhy would you be afraid to show your list?

What a chickenshit.

[Spurtacular]

Why would you be afraid to show your list?



If I'm the sole arbiter, then why do you think you get to demand a list? I guess you got your "own rules," sport.

Also :lol that you erased your tantrum-induced "chicken shit" remark.

[Pavlov]

If I'm the sole arbiter, then why do you think you get to demand a list? I guess you got your "own rules," sport.So you have a secret gay list.

lol "sport"

[Spurtacular]

So you have a secret gay list.

lol "sport"

I've issued my ruling. You're having a hard time coming to terms.

[Pavlov]

I've issued my ruling. You're having a hard time coming to terms.I have no problem with your keeping your secret gay list a secret. You'll come out with it when you feel safe. No one should force you.

[Spurtacular]

...

[Pavlov]

Okay. Meantime, you've demonstrated sufficiently that you have no real interest in the gays outside of politics.Not by my reckoning, but you've got your secret gay list to go with all the other issues you have to work out for yourself.

Good luck with your secret gay list.

[Spurtacular]

More good stuff.

https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/four-women-accuse-new-yorks-attorney-general-of-physical-abuse

Haven't had the time to read all of it b/c chump cannot come to terms with the fact that he's not very progressive towards the gays....

But this Manning Barish lady engaged in a consentual physically extreme relationship for two years and then decided after the fact that she needed to fling some poo.

:lmao #MePoo

Fabbs (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=3662) Back to the bizzo for ya there, bro.

[Pavlov]

Haven't had the time to read all of it b/c chump cannot come to terms with the fact that he's not very progressive towards the gays....

But this Manning Barish lady engaged in a consentual physically extreme relationship for two years and then decided after the fact that she needed to fling some poo.

:lmao #MePooYou've never had a girlfriend.

Your secret gay list makes even more sense now.

[Spurtacular]

You've never had a girlfriend.

Your secret gay list makes even more sense now.

:lol Tantrum mode.

[Pavlov]

:lol Tantrum mode.:lol You didn't even try to deny it.

[Spurtacular]

:cry But muh fart in the wind. :cry

:lol

[Pavlov]

:lol:lol fake quote white flag

It's back to your secret gay list for you.

[Spurtacular]

:lol fake quote white flag

It's back to your secret gay list for you.

There is no list. Zero is the # of ways you non-politically care about the gay community.

[Pavlov]

There is no list.No requirements?

Why are you acting like there are requirements then?

[Spurtacular]

No requirements?

Why are you acting like there are requirements then?

This is your schtick. Beats coming to terms I guess.

[Pavlov]

This is your schtick. Beats coming to terms I guess.I came to terms with your failure to define anything here a long time ago; i.e., proof of support for gays.

You tried, but you just couldn't commit to anything.

Ever.

Your fear always makes you shit yourself.

[Spurtacular]

I came to terms with your failure to define anything here a long time ago; i.e., proof of support for gays.

You tried, but you just couldn't commit to anything.

Ever.

Your fear always makes you shit yourself.

You've said this many times now. It's as if you are really trying to convince yourself.

[Pavlov]

You've said this many times now. It's as if you are really trying to convince yourself.You're the one trying here.

I just asked you a couple questions and you folded like a lawn chair.

No requirements.

lol

[Fabbs]

Haven't had the time to read all of it b/c chump cannot come to terms with the fact that he's not very progressive towards the gays....

But this Manning Barish lady engaged in a consentual physically extreme relationship for two years...

:lmao #MePoo

Fabbs (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=3662) Back to the bizzo for ya there, bro.
ya for the one chick to tolerate that to the extent she did. Either she is extremely low self esteem needed / needs help or she was down with it, now slinging MePoo.

I'd still like the door to be kept wide open for victims of years ago if it's only now they find courage to speak out.

[Spurtacular]

:lol Hollywood recording the "bad behavior" and saying nothing all along.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/movies/celebrity/morgan-freeman-made-a-lewd-comment-to-me-on-a-red-carpet-—-heres-why-im-speaking-out/ar-AAxOrKd?ocid=spartanntp

[Spurtacular]

Clammin' it up!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=68&v=jEHROuz9E7E

[SnakeBoy]

Rapist Bill Clinton laments that times have changed


Bill Clinton: 'Norms have changed' for what you can do to somebody against their will
https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/11/politics/bill-clinton-al-franken-sexual-harassment/index.html

[Blake]

Yeah famous people used to be able to grab em by the pussy at will

[Spurtacular]

Yeah famous people used to be able to grab em by the pussy at will

That was the only way you were gonna get married.

:lmao Yesterday's cuck

[Blake]

That was the only way you were gonna get married.

:lmao Yesterday's cuck

So you're saying I have to sexually assault a woman to get her to marry me.

[Spurtacular]

So you're saying I have to sexually assault a woman to get her to marry me.

She grabbed your pussy, bruh. :lol

[Blake]

She grabbed your pussy, bruh. :lol

Own your fantasizing, sistuh

[Spurtacular]

Own your fantasizing, sistuh

You should own reality. Have you admitted what everyone else has admitted? That you were cucked.

[MultiTroll]

Sports Illustrated headline reads: Female Reporter Sexually Assaulted on Live TV at World Cup.

What actually happened.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=99AMTncHqh4

[Spurtacular]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOs7ToHF-9M

[Spurtacular]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yt6NjqFNtqo

[Spurtacular]

:lmao

Trump slamming the #MePoo generation.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-mocks-supernumbermetoo-movement-in-montana-rally/ar-AAzDIYR?ocid=spartandhp

[Spurtacular]

So you’re cool with rape and other forms of sexual assault.

Once again you prove how deeply panicked you are about the world finding out you suck cock for cigarette money. Angry at those lucky ones born female again. If that had happened for you, you’re parents might still talk to you.

Who raped you?

[boutons_deux]

Misogyny is fundamental to male white supremacy

[Winehole23]

https://highline.huffingtonpost.com/articles/en/hsbc-sexual-harassment-hr/

[Blake]

Who raped you?

Oh a spurt gay assault fantasy. No way!

[Spurtacular]

Oh a spurt gay assault fantasy. No way!

You're a cuck. Come to terms.

[Blake]

You're gay. The evidence is clear. You're the one needing to come to terms.

[Spurtacular]

You're gay. The evidence is clear. You're the one needing to come to terms.

Fiction. Meanwhile, reality is you're a cuck, bro. This is documented. What do you honestly think that means for you? You should've just left the board right after you announced that. You seem to think there's coming back from that; there isn't.

[AaronY]

Imagine the level of a brain that finds #mepoo funny

[Spurtacular]

^^^

Stable genius level. I can see why you're struggling.

[Blake]

Fiction. Meanwhile, reality is you're a cuck, bro. This is documented. What do you honestly think that means for you? You should've just left the board right after you announced that. You seem to think there's coming back from that; there isn't.

Define "cuck" so I can help you ultimately realize how gay you are

[Spurtacular]

Define "cuck"

Other guys fuck you're wife cos you're an excuse for a man.

:lmao

"nother level"

AaronY

[spurraider21]

https://i.imgur.com/x6xtAGq.jpg

"#MePoo"

[Spurtacular]

^^^

Spermshielding for you 'lil buddy cuck. Par. :lol

[Blake]

Other guys fuck you're wife cos you're an excuse for a man.

:lmao

"nother level"

AaronY

Happened once. I handled it.

Never mentioned multiple men. That fantasy is all you.

When you imagine these men do you picture them with really big dicks?

[Spurtacular]

Happened once. I handled it.

Never mentioned multiple men. That fantasy is all you.

When you imagine these men do you picture them with really big dicks?

:lmao You didn't get the response you were hoping for and yet you're still trying to hammer the square peg into the round hole.
:lmao "Handled it" by having a coming out cuck party on SpursTalk.
:lmao Today's cuck.
:lmao "nother level" AaronY

[Pavlov]

Anyone know why derp is so pro-rape?

[Spurtacular]

Anyone know why derp is so pro-rape?
Blake

Chump acknowledging you're getting raped. :lmao

[Pavlov]

Blake

Chump acknowledging you're getting raped. :lmao:lol that's the worst spin attempt I have ever seen here.

You support the raping of women.

Why?

[Spurtacular]

Anyone know why derp is so pro-rape?


:lol that's the worst spin attempt I have ever seen here.

I've seen you do worse, tbh.

[Blake]

You're so stupid.

[Pavlov]

I've seen you do worse, tbh.But why do you support the rape of women?

[Spurtacular]

You're so stupid.

Cuck blake's standard fetal position post.

AaronY

"nother level"

:rollin

[Blake]

Cuck blake's standard fetal position post.

AaronY

"nother level"

:rollin

What do you believe you're doing in this forum with these threads and these posts? All you end up doing is having people end up calling you stupid.

I'm just cutting to the chase. You're a fucking idiot.

[AaronY]

Im right there with the lakers apparently

http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/24090343/los-angeles-lakers-magic-johnson-says-team-three-year-plan-whole-nother-level-lebron-james-arrival

[Spurtacular]

What do you believe you're doing in this forum with these threads and these posts? All you end up doing is having people end up calling you stupid.

I'm just cutting to the chase. You're a fucking idiot.

Doubling down on the fetal. :lol

[Spurtacular]

Pavlov

Why do you support the rape of women?

[Spurtacular]

:lmao

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/08/06/les-moonves-and-cbs-face-allegations-of-sexual-misconduct

[Pavlov]

Why is derp laughing at sexual assault?

Will be interesting if someone tries to get Scorsese to verify one of the stories.

[koriwhat]

:lmao

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/08/06/les-moonves-and-cbs-face-allegations-of-sexual-misconduct

how the mighty are all going to fall and it's grand!

[Spurtacular]

how the mighty are all going to fall and it's grand!

:lmao Getting caught in their own snares.

[Pavlov]

:lmao Getting caught in their own snares.Did Moonves make his own snare?

[Mikeanaro]

:lol Ronda Farrow, poor queer who doesnt have another thing to do (like most gay men) than try to be informed about women sleeping with men.

:lol Illeana Douglas, ugly bitch who now wants to report something that ¨happened¨ 22 years ago.

#MePooalongpileofshit

[Spurtacular]

Did Moonves make his own snare?

His network went full speed ahead with #MePoo

[Pavlov]

His network went full speed ahead with #MePooIn what ways?

Explain.

[Mikeanaro]

In what ways?

Explain.
More than explain at least read the article or google about it, you are the ignorant one.

[koriwhat]

More than explain at least read the article or google about it, you are the ignorant one.

it's his shtick because he isn't the intellectual he believes he is. pavTHETIC's ego won't let him think otherwise though. indicative of the left but more so the left's extremists who have a 1 track mind like pavTHETIC.

[Mikeanaro]

it's his shtick because he isn't the intellectual he believes he is. pavTHETIC's ego won't let him think otherwise though. indicative of the left but more so the left's extremists who have a 1 track mind like pavTHETIC.
1-PLEASE EXPLAIN!
2-YES OR NO!
3-WHATS ILLEGAL? DID YOU CALL THE AUTHORITIES?
4-I DONT KNOW!
5-DO YOU?
6- 50 more nonsense questions judging the messenger, not the subject.

[Pavlov]

More than explain at least read the article or google about it, you are the ignorant one.So it wasn't his own snare.

Cool.

[Pavlov]

1-PLEASE EXPLAIN!
2-YES OR NO!
3-WHATS ILLEGAL? DID YOU CALL THE AUTHORITIES?
4-I DONT KNOW!
5-DO YOU?
6- 50 more nonsense questions judging the messenger, not the subject.
But you don't believe any of the accusations anyway, so?

[koriwhat]

1-PLEASE EXPLAIN!
2-YES OR NO!
3-WHATS ILLEGAL? DID YOU CALL THE AUTHORITIES?
4-I DONT KNOW!
5-DO YOU?
6- 50 more nonsense questions judging the messenger, not the subject.

nailed it!

[Mikeanaro]

So it wasn't his own snare.

Cool.
If you say so it could be his own tom tom, hi hat or china crash.

[Pavlov]

If you say so it could be his own tom tom, hi hat or china crash.It was none of these.

You don't believe any of the accusers anyway, so Moonves appreciates your support.

[Spurtacular]

In what ways?

Explain.

:lmao Chump needs documentation.

[Pavlov]

:lmao Chump needs documentation.:lmao derp is only going to talk about me from now on because I upset him.

[Blake]

:lmao Chump needs documentation.

You guys don't want it. Being stupid and gullible is more fun, huh.

[Mikeanaro]

It was none of these.

You don't believe any of the accusers anyway, so Moonves appreciates your support.
I dont believe most of Weinstein accusers, they used these old sacks to get plays/money and now its time to get more attention.

[Pavlov]

I dont believe most of Weinstein accusers, they used these old sacks to get plays/money and now its time to get more attention.Of course you don't believe them, you think they're icky girls and will give you cooties.

[Mikeanaro]

Of course you don't believe them, you think they're icky girls and will give you cooties.
It doesnt matter what I think, fact is all those women used him to get higher, whats the point of talking about things that ¨happened¨ more than 50 years ago.

:lol ¨Todays¨ victims.

[koriwhat]

You guys don't want it. Being stupid and gullible is more fun, huh.

what party do you subscribe to exactly? lmao at gullible.


I dont believe most of Weinstein accusers, they used these old sacks to get plays/money and now its time to get more attention.

i'm sure there's quite a bit telling the truth and a whole lot of them are just whores who would do anything for fame & money.

[Pavlov]

It doesnt matter what I think, fact is all those women used him to get higher, whats the point of talking about things that ¨happened¨ more than 50 years ago.

:lol ¨Todays¨ victims.Of course you don't believe them. Unless maybe it fits your political agenda.

[Mikeanaro]

what party do you subscribe to exactly? lmao at gullible.



i'm sure there's quite a bit telling the truth and a whole lot of them are just whores who would do anything for fame & money.
Lets say Asia Argento is very whore-ish.
And the whole circle of actors is weird people, mostly liberals that wants to fuck everybody get bored and search new people to fuck.

[Mikeanaro]

Of course you don't believe them. Unless maybe it fits your political agenda.
It doesnt matter what I believe.
But my opinion doesnt fit my conservative agenda actually, it would be easier to accuse and condemn Weinstein since he was a Hilda supporter and friends with Oprah and shit like Meryl Streep.

[koriwhat]

It doesnt matter what I believe.
But my opinion doesnt fit my conservative agenda actually, it would be easier to accuse and condemn Weinstein since he was a Hilda supporter and friends with Oprah and shit like Meryl Streep.

he wants you to believe 100% of everything when it fits his agenda and not doing so makes you the odd man out and the enemy. it's all games and twisting of reality for these stupid fucks like pavTHETIC. there's no coming to an agreement on anything if it goes against his/their bs party. lemmings that just won't jump off the cliff fast enough.

[Blake]

he wants you to believe 100% of everything when it fits his agenda and not doing so makes you the odd man out and the enemy. it's all games and twisting of reality for these stupid fucks like pavTHETIC. there's no coming to an agreement on anything if it goes against his/their bs party. lemmings that just won't jump off the cliff fast enough.

Boo hoo

[koriwhat]

Boo hoo

keep crying crybaby bitchmade boohoo blake.

[Blake]

K, druggy

[Mikeanaro]

he wants you to believe 100% of everything when it fits his agenda and not doing so makes you the odd man out and the enemy. it's all games and twisting of reality for these stupid fucks like pavTHETIC. there's no coming to an agreement on anything if it goes against his/their bs party. lemmings that just won't jump off the cliff fast enough.
All about emotions and you are with us or SUFFER THE CONSEQUENCES, right?
That 4.1% economic growth must really hurt, deep inside that safe space, lol.

[Pavlov]

It doesnt matter what I believe.
But my opinion doesnt fit my conservative agenda actually, it would be easier to accuse and condemn Weinstein since he was a Hilda supporter and friends with Oprah and shit like Meryl Streep.Do you believe Bill Clinton's accusers?

[Pavlov]

he wants you to believe 100% of everything when it fits his agenda and not doing so makes you the odd man out and the enemy. it's all games and twisting of reality for these stupid fucks like pavTHETIC. there's no coming to an agreement on anything if it goes against his/their bs party. lemmings that just won't jump off the cliff fast enough.That's a lot of emotion you just expressed.

[Mikeanaro]

Do you believe Bill Clinton's accusers?
It doesnt matter, what matters is he was the POTUS and fucked an intern (Lewinsky), put cigars in her fat pussey.
All the other stuff just adds more to his pile of shit.

[Pavlov]

It doesnt matter, what matters is he was the POTUS and fucked an intern (Lewinsky), put cigars in her fat pussey.
All the other stuff just adds more to his pile of shit.:lol afraid to even say what you think.

[Mikeanaro]

:lol afraid to even say what you think.
Actually opinions dont have any weight when you have facts.

[koriwhat]

That's a lot of emotion you just expressed.

i don't think you grasp when someone is emotional and when someone is making a statement to be quite honest. i think it boils down to the fact that your ilk is so caught up in feelings and day dreaming about a fake utopia that yall are so far from reality there's no coming back.

i make a statement and all you have is this stupid "emotions" come back every damn time. it proves you have no clue and you're on repeat like a stupid fucking 5 yr old kid. children of the corn is what yall are.

[Blake]

Actually opinions dont have any weight when you have facts.

Which you're also afraid to post

[Pavlov]

i don't think you grasp when someone is emotional and when someone is making a statement to be quite honest. i think it boils down to the fact that your ilk is so caught up in feelings and day dreaming about a fake utopia that yall are so far from reality there's no coming back.

i make a statement and all you have is this stupid "emotions" come back every damn time. it proves you have no clue and you're on repeat like a stupid fucking 5 yr old kid. children of the corn is what yall are.
You're pretty emotional all the time tbh

[koriwhat]

You're pretty emotional all the time tbh

funny... my friend says i have no emotions every time i bitch about her dog. she claims i'm heartless. who's right? i do have emotions though like any human. i am just not a bitch like you pavTHETIC. sorry.

[Pavlov]

funny... my friend says i have no emotions every time i bitch about her dog. she claims i'm heartless. who's right? i do have emotions though like any human. i am just not a bitch like you pavTHETIC. sorry.Why would you bitch about a dog?

That just proves you're a terrible person.

[Blake]

funny... my friend says i have no emotions every time i bitch about her dog. she claims i'm heartless.

You're heartless and emotional.

[pgardn]

Actually opinions dont have any weight when you have facts.

In politics, facts lead to opinions.

Do you have any clue as to what forum you are posting in?

[koriwhat]

Why would you bitch about a dog?

That just proves you're a terrible person.

dogs that aren't disciplined are a pain in the ass and act just as bad as some of yall here; you pavTHETIC.


You're heartless and emotional.

lmao

[Blake]

Lol pretend lmao ^

[koriwhat]

Lol pretend lmao ^

Lol pretend not being a cuck ^

[Spurtacular]

:lmao derp is only going to talk about me from now on because I upset him.

Nope. Just :lol'ing at your phony prosecutions.

[Mikeanaro]

In politics, facts lead to opinions.

Do you have any clue as to what forum you are posting in?
Who cares about opinions after knowing the fact that he was a married man, a president, fucking a 20 year old women in the oval office, sticking cigars inside her pussy to moist them.
Thats like defending a serial killer, actions speak louder than words, fuck opinions its out of the subjective realm.

[Mikeanaro]

Which you're also afraid to post
Why deflect from the subject? he did it who cares what you me or anybody thinks?

[pgardn]

Who cares about opinions after knowing the fact that he was a married man, a president, fucking a 20 year old women in the oval office, sticking cigars inside her pussy to moist them.
Thats like defending a serial killer, actions speak louder than words, fuck opinions its out of the subjective realm.

Whats wrong with a serial killer?

You need no opinion on them.
Go ahead, just give us a fact.

Another idiot...

[Mikeanaro]

Whats wrong with a serial killer?

You need no opinion on them.
Go ahead, just give us a fact.

Another idiot...
Dude, thank god your stupid psychocandidate lost, enjoy it.

[Pavlov]

Nope. Just :lol'ing at your phony prosecutions.:lol only talking about me again.

As predicted.

[Spurtacular]

:lol only talking about me again.

As predicted.

You make it about yourself.

Predictable.

[Pavlov]

You make it about yourself.

Predictable.You can't stop posting about me.

lol

[Spurtacular]

You can't stop posting about me.

lol

You sound like your tranny man. Manufacturing flattery from men. :lmao

[Pavlov]

You sound like your tranny man. Manufacturing flattery from men. :lmaoYou'll cry out for us some more.

[Spurtacular]

You'll cry out for us some more.

Are you done, Mary Jane?