Trump 2020

[Spurtacular]

Alpha announced he's running 980 days in advance just to melt you snowflakes to the ground. :lmao

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/JVblOrzRfL4/hqdefault.jpg

[DMX7]

That's noy the reason he announced. He may not even be running in 2020 (if he's not impeached first). He wants to rake in those "campaign contributions". He's got the RNC forking over a ton for his legal bills and for Trump Tower office space. :lol

[Spurtacular]

That's noy the reason he announced. He may not even be running in 2020 (if he's not impeached first). He wants to rake in those "campaign contributions". He's got the RNC forking over a ton for his legal bills and for Trump Tower office space. :lol

:lol Trump ain't Hillary, brah.

[Chris]

Don't really see anyone on either side challenging him tbh. Oprah? :lmao

His approval rating is already 7 percentage points higher than Obama's was at this time during his tenure. I'm sure people like Jill Stein and maybe even Bernie Sanders may try to cash in one more time, but it's not going to matter.

I don't see the Democratic Party recovering after all is said and done with the multiple investigations and their recent bankruptcy. The Dems have been soiled with Radical Socialism and those kinds of stains are hard to wash out. The Information Age has not been kind to the Democrats either now that we have a clear picture on the history of their party. People like Dinesh D'Souza and Ben Shapiro are the real patriots enduring endless strife to deliver the uncomfortable truths.

[Reck]

That's noy the reason he announced. He may not even be running in 2020 (if he's not impeached first). He wants to rake in those "campaign contributions". He's got the RNC forking over a ton for his legal bills and for Trump Tower office space. :lol

Derptacular with another self own. :lol

[clambake]

tick tock

[RandomGuy]

Don't really see anyone on either side challenging him tbh. Oprah? :lmao

His approval rating is already 7 percentage points higher than Obama's was at this time during his tenure. I'm sure people like Jill Stein and maybe even Bernie Sanders may try to cash in one more time, but it's not going to matter.

I don't see the Democratic Party recovering after all is said and done with the multiple investigations and their recent bankruptcy. The Dems have been soiled with Radical Socialism and those kinds of stains are hard to wash out. The Information Age has not been kind to the Democrats either now that we have a clear picture on the history of their party. People like Dinesh D'Souza and Ben Shapiro are the real patriots enduring endless strife to deliver the uncomfortable truths.

That is some serious delusion going on.

Obama, approval 2-15-10 = 53%
Drumpf has never gone above 45%, and is currently hovering at 37% or so, which is still lower than Obama's ever was.

http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/data/popularity.php

You might be thinking about his disapproval rating. Trump scores about 20% higher than Obama in that regard at this point.

[Spurtacular]

That is some serious delusion going on.

Obama, approval 2-15-10 = 53%
Drumpf has never gone above 45%, and is currently hovering at 37% or so, which is still lower than Obama's ever was.

http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/data/popularity.php

You might be thinking about his disapproval rating. Trump scores about 20% higher than Obama in that regard at this point.

He's going by Rasmussen, not your phony gallup sh**.

[Reck]

He's going by Rasmussen, not your phony gallup sh**.

Again showing your partisan hackery.

:lol Rassmussen

[Pavlov]

He's going by Rasmussen, not your phony gallup sh**.
Dude can't even type "shit"?

:lol

[koriwhat]

Don't really see anyone on either side challenging him tbh. Oprah? :lmao

His approval rating is already 7 percentage points higher than Obama's was at this time during his tenure. I'm sure people like Jill Stein and maybe even Bernie Sanders may try to cash in one more time, but it's not going to matter.

I don't see the Democratic Party recovering after all is said and done with the multiple investigations and their recent bankruptcy. The Dems have been soiled with Radical Socialism and those kinds of stains are hard to wash out. The Information Age has not been kind to the Democrats either now that we have a clear picture on the history of their party. People like Dinesh D'Souza and Ben Shapiro are the real patriots enduring endless strife to deliver the uncomfortable truths.

:tu

[Spurtacular]

Again showing your partisan hackery.

:lol Rassmussen

All the polls are partisan, tranny.

[Chris]

That is some serious delusion going on.

Obama, approval 2-15-10 = 53%
Drumpf has never gone above 45%, and is currently hovering at 37% or so, which is still lower than Obama's ever was.

http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/data/popularity.php

You might be thinking about his disapproval rating. Trump scores about 20% higher than Obama in that regard at this point.

Yep Spurtacular nailed it :tu


The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Tuesday shows that 50% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Trump’s job performance. Forty-eight percent (48%) disapprove.

By comparison, President Obama earned 43% approval on this date in the second year of his presidency

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/trump_administration/prez_track_feb28

toodles!

[RandomGuy]

He's going by Rasmussen, not your phony gallup sh**.

Rasmussen :rollin

[RandomGuy]

After the 2010 midterm elections, Silver concluded that Rasmussen's polls were the least accurate of the major pollsters in 2010, having an average error of 5.8 points and a pro-Republican bias of 3.9 points according to Silver's model.[70] Conservative polling analyst Neil Stevens wrote, "after the primaries [Silver] said Rasmussen was in his crosshairs for ducking out on a number of races by not polling primaries."[82] FiveThirtyEight currently rates Rasmussen Reports with a C+ grade and notes a simple average error of 5.3 percent across 657 polls analyzed.[8

[boutons_deux]

Rasmussen :rollin

Rasmussen guaranteed a Bishop Gekko landslide a few days before the '12 election.

[Chris]

lol wrong :lol

lol but muh 2010 :lol

[Reck]

Yep Spurtacular (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=49615) nailed it :tu



toodles!

But what if I tell you...he's not.

Rassmussen is shamelessly partisan and leans heavy to the right.

I think explaining this further may give me an aneurysm.

[Spurtacular]

Rasmussen :rollin

Yea, uber libtards don't like it.

[Spurtacular]

After the 2010 midterm elections, Silver concluded that Rasmussen's polls were the least accurate of the major pollsters in 2010, having an average error of 5.8 points and a pro-Republican bias of 3.9 points according to Silver's model.[70] Conservative polling analyst Neil Stevens wrote, "after the primaries [Silver] said Rasmussen was in his crosshairs for ducking out on a number of races by not polling primaries."[82] FiveThirtyEight currently rates Rasmussen Reports with a C+ grade and notes a simple average error of 5.3 percent across 657 polls analyzed.[8

Or it was the most right and shows the extent of the rigging.

[Pavlov]

Or it was the most right and shows the extent of the rigging.:lmao

OK, what was the rigging in 2010?

Be specific.

[Spurtacular]

:lmao

OK, what was the rigging in 2010?

Be specific.

I was actually thinking 2012. I don't tend to care that much about midterms. I ain't a partisan hanger-on like you, tbh.

[Pavlov]

I was actually thinking 2012. I don't tend to care that much about midterms. I ain't a partisan hanger-on like you, tbh.Too bad the excerpt was about 2010.

:lol you didn't read it

[Spurtacular]

Too bad the excerpt was about 2010.

:lol you didn't read it

Still taking the smallest W's you can get I see.

.001 :lmao

[RandomGuy]

I was actually thinking 2012. I don't tend to care that much about midterms. I ain't a partisan hanger-on like you, tbh.

oooo man, I am bookmarking that shit.

Midterms are coming.

[Pavlov]

Still taking the smallest W's you can get I see.

.001 :lmaoYou're the one who didn't read it.

lol

[Spurtacular]

oooo man, I am bookmarking that shit.

Midterms are coming.

Why? So that if I "care" you'll think you have something?

:lmao dumbass.

[Spurtacular]

You're the one who didn't read it.

lol

Teeny weeny. You should take what you can get. As someone that gets shat on daily, that must feel like a refreshing rain to you.

[Pavlov]

Teeny weeny. You should take what you can get. As someone that gets shat on daily, that must feel like a refreshing rain to you.You're the one that talks shit without reading anything.

lol

[Spurtacular]

You're the one that talks shit without reading anything.

lol

Bro, relish your minuscule W by all means. They're so far and few in between and so otherwise insignificant at that.

[Pavlov]

Bro, relish your minuscule W by all means. They're so far and few in between and so otherwise insignificant at that.As long as you keep whining about it, everyone will see you lost.

lol

[Spurtacular]

As long as you keep whining about it, everyone will see you lost.

lol

Wow, you don't even know how to process your lil W's. Talk about an insecurity complex. :lol

[Reck]

Wow, you don't even know how to process your lil W's. Talk about an insecurity complex. :lol

Way to prove his point immediately. :lol derp's gonna derp.

[Spurtacular]

Way to prove his point immediately. :lol derp's gonna derp.

You're becoming as bad as your cuck buddy with your gimpy chime-ins. :lol

[Pavlov]

Way to prove his point immediately. :lol derp's gonna derp.:lol dude can't stand it.

[Chris]

Rasmussen :rollin

968865170444386304

https://media1.giphy.com/media/GNW1eKeUlEcGk/giphy.gif

[Pavlov]

polls good now

[Spurtacular]

polls good now

Are you not the one who says they're always good? So, no issue. Just doing your thing of playing in the weeds. Par.

[Pavlov]

Are you not the one who says they're always good?And now the straw man.

lol

[Spurtacular]

:cry I love the polls 'til I don't :cry

[Pavlov]

And now the fake quote.

[Spurtacular]

And now my true subtext

[Pavlov]

Another fake quote.

[Spurtacular]

Another fake quote.

For a fake person.

[Pavlov]

For a fake person.making it about me again

[Spurtacular]

making it about me again

You get what you give: Crap in this case. :lol

[Pavlov]

You get what you give: Crap in this case. :lolSo the posts you make without even reading anything are not crap?

[Spurtacular]

So the posts you make without even reading anything are not crap?

What are you whining about?

[Chris]

Dems have no chance in 2020


ICE removal key goal of Democrats in 2020 election



The Democrats mulling a run for the White House in 2020 are facing intense pressure from liberals to campaign on abolishing the agency that enforces federal immigration laws, a proposal that was once relegated to the far-left fringe.

In protesting the Trump administration’s policies toward illegal immigration, liberal commentators and writers have been embracing the idea of gutting the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, which identifies, arrests and deports illegal immigrants inside the United States.

“This is a growing position on the left, and I imagine 2020 Democratic presidential aspirants will have to grapple with it,” liberal writer and MSNBC host Chris Hayes tweeted.

972182106880258049


In January, the idea was endorsed by Brian Fallon, a former top aide to 2016 Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, and Eric Holder, President Barack Obama’s attorney general. The Daily Caller first drew attention to the calls.

“ICE operates as an unaccountable deportation force,” Fallon tweeted. “Dems running in 2020 should campaign on ending the agency in its current form.”


955152616367034368


Thomas Homan, the acting director of ICE, has reacted to these calls by Democrats by saying they should speak to victims of illegal immigrant crime.

“These politicians, they need to talk to the victims of alien crime, talk to the parents that I talk to that lost children at the hands of criminal aliens,” Homan said Thursday on Fox News’ “Tucker Carlson Tonight.”

But the idea has picked up steam in recent days after Hayes, the MSNBC host, asked Democratic California Sen. Kamala Harris if she believes ICE should exist.

“ICE has a purpose, ICE has a role, ICE should exist,” Harris, a potential 2020 candidate, responded. “But let’s not abuse the power.”

Since then, Harris, the former attorney general of California, has faced a backlash from liberal publications.

“Kamala Harris is very likely running for president in 2020,” Jack Mirkinson of the liberal Splinter website wrote. “It should be a political problem for her that she is not willing to take her criticisms of ICE to their logical conclusion and call for its abolition.”

He added: “She should be asked, over and over again, why exactly she is willing to uphold the legitimacy of such a racist, corrupt, and thuggish organization.”

Mirkinson wrote that other potential candidates -- like Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti -- “should be asked the same question.”

PELOSI SLAMS CALIFORNIA ICE RAID AS ‘UNJUST AND CRUEL’

The Nation, a liberal magazine, last week also published an article titled “It’s Time to Abolish ICE.” The writer accused the agency of being part of an “unbridled white-supremacist surveillance state” and called it “an unaccountable strike force executing a campaign of ethnic cleansing.”

“Though the party has moved left on core issues -- from reproductive rights to single-payer health care -- it’s time for progressives to put forward a demand that deportation be taken not as the norm, but rather as a disturbing indicator of authoritarianism,” McElwee wrote.

Democratic officeholders also have been openly rebelling against ICE, including Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf, who recently tipped off the public to an immigration raid in the San Francisco Bay Area.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., last week slammed that raid as "unjust and cruel."

Attorney General Jeff Sessions, in a speech in California last week, said as many as 800 illegal immigrants may have evaded capture and said Schaff’s tip-off put both residents and law enforcement at risk.

SESSIONS UNLOADS ON CALIFORNIA DEMS FOR ‘RADICAL, OPEN BORDERS AGENDA’

Sessions called California’s "open borders" policies a “radical, irrational idea that cannot be accepted.”

“It cannot be the policy of a great nation to reward those who unlawfully enter its country with legal status, Social Security, welfare, food stamps, and work permits and so forth,” he said. “How can this be a sound policy?”

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/03/12/ice-removal-key-goal-democrats-in-2020-election.html

[Spurtacular]

https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/16/politics/trump-2020-fundraising-second-quarter/index.html

[Spurtacular]

https://pixel.nymag.com/imgs/daily/intelligencer/2018/07/20/magazine/20-elizabeth-warren-4-color.nocrop.w1024.h2147483647.2x.jpg

:lmao Chumpettes

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/07/elizabeth-warren-fight-to-defeat-trump.html

[pgardn]

Trump has absolutely solid Republican support on the poll level.
Trump is hated by Democrats at an unprecedented level.

Trump loses with the independents.

Its Trump v. whomever

Republicans thoroughly love the perceived payback. Obama apparently screwed with the white world, even though he didn’t. They are completely behind an incompetent clown. I would, at this point, vote for Bernie even though his economics plan is totally screwed.

And we wait...

[SnakeBoy]

I would, at this point, vote for Bernie even though his economics plan is totally screwed.


You would vote against your own interests because you're triggered by tweets

[pgardn]

You would vote against your own interests because you're triggered by tweets

No.

I don’t vote for wanna be autocrats.
Who lie.

I can go to Venezuela for that.

[boutons_deux]

Here’s How State-Level Democrats Could Keep Trump off the 2020 Ballot

There is no law that says a presidential candidate must release his or her tax returns to the public, so legislators in at least 23 states have drafted at least 40 bills to create one.

These laws would hinge access to the state presidential ballot on voluntary disclosure.

It’s our position that these ballot access measures are constitutional,”

said Corey Goldstone, media strategist at the Campaign Legal Center, a nonpartisan nonprofit in Washington, D.C., that advocates for strong campaign finance laws.

https://rewire.news/article/2018/07/23/heres-how-state-level-democrats-could-keep-trump-off-the-2020-ballot/

popular with people but not with state legislators.

[Spurtacular]

I don’t vote for wanna be autocrats.
Who lie.


So, you didn't vote for Obama and Hillary, then?

[Killakobe81]

Don't really see anyone on either side challenging him tbh. Oprah? :lmao

His approval rating is already 7 percentage points higher than Obama's was at this time during his tenure. I'm sure people like Jill Stein and maybe even Bernie Sanders may try to cash in one more time, but it's not going to matter.

I don't see the Democratic Party recovering after all is said and done with the multiple investigations and their recent bankruptcy. The Dems have been soiled with Radical Socialism and those kinds of stains are hard to wash out. The Information Age has not been kind to the Democrats either now that we have a clear picture on the history of their party. People like Dinesh D'Souza and Ben Shapiro are the real patriots enduring endless strife to deliver the uncomfortable truths.

Ill be happy to vote Republican if you guys give me a better candidate.
Democrats dont have my loyalty like the Lakers or Cowboys.
Best candidate or least repulsive like 2016 will get my vote.

[Spurtacular]

Best candidate or least repulsive like 2016 will get my vote.

Who got your vote in 2016?

[SnakeBoy]

No.

I don’t vote for wanna be autocrats.
Who lie.

I can go to Venezuela for that.

*ding*

[boutons_deux]

Trump has absolutely solid Republican support on the poll level.
Trump is hated by Democrats at an unprecedented level.

Trump loses with the independents.

Its Trump v. whomever

Republicans thoroughly love the perceived payback. Obama apparently screwed with the white world, even though he didn’t. They are completely behind an incompetent clown. I would, at this point, vote for Bernie even though his economics plan is totally screwed.

And we wait...

Bad News For Republicans As Moms Have Turned On Trump Over Border Child Kidnapping


https://media3.s-nbcnews.com/j/newscms/2018_30/2510191/net_approval_of_trump_by_issue_mothers_of_children _under_18_fathers_of_children_under_18_no_kids_cur rently_in_household_chartbuilder_fdd39ca9f00e82f50 5c61e5aa44be11b.nbcnews-ux-600-480.png

https://www.politicususa.com/2018/07/26/mothers-have-completely-turned-on-trump-over-border-child-kidnapping.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+politicususa%2FfJAl+%28Politi cus+USA+%29

[boutons_deux]

The Blue Wave Strengthens As Women Support Democrats By Massive 2-To-1 Margin

Because of Democratic strength with the female electorate, they now hold a 12-point advantage – 51 to 39 percent overall – heading into the critical midterm elections.

Key findings from the survey:



Women voters: 57 to 32 percent Democratic advantage
Men voters: 46 to 44 percent Republican advantage
White voters: 46 to 45 percent Democratic advantage
African American voters: 78 to 16 percent Democratic advantage
Hispanic voters: 66 to 22 percent Democratic advantage


Even the demographic groups with whom Republicans appear competitive – male and white voters – aren’t really good news for them heading into the midterms.

According to 2016 exit polls (https://www.cnn.com/election/2016/results/exit-polls), Trump carried those two voting blocs by 11 points and 20 points, respectively.

Trump is bringing down the GOP

The Trump presidency has been a raging dumpster fire since day one, but in recent weeks it has devolved into a blazing landfill.

https://www.politicususa.com/2018/07/26/blue-wave-strengthens-democrats.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+politicususa%2FfJAl+%28Politi cus+USA+%29

[Killakobe81]

Who got your vote in 2016?

I reluctantly voted for the loser...

[rmt]

Bad News For Republicans As Moms Have Turned On Trump Over Border Child Kidnapping


https://media3.s-nbcnews.com/j/newscms/2018_30/2510191/net_approval_of_trump_by_issue_mothers_of_children _under_18_fathers_of_children_under_18_no_kids_cur rently_in_household_chartbuilder_fdd39ca9f00e82f50 5c61e5aa44be11b.nbcnews-ux-600-480.png

https://www.politicususa.com/2018/07/26/mothers-have-completely-turned-on-trump-over-border-child-kidnapping.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+politicususa%2FfJAl+%28Politi cus+USA+%29

bou, maybe you don't have children and don't consider that among those options Families at border (people I don't even know) is waaaaaaaay down the list compared to Economy (what most affects my immediate family), North Korea (the thought of nuclear war), trade (cost of goods) and Russia (possession of most nuclear weapons after US).

[boutons_deux]

bou, maybe you don't have children and don't consider that among those options Families at border (people I don't even know) is waaaaaaaay down the list compared to Economy (what most affects my immediate family), North Korea (the thought of nuclear war), trade (cost of goods) and Russia (possession of most nuclear weapons after US).

as typical black-hearted rightwingnutjob, you wouldn't be empathetic if your kids lives depended on it.

[Spurtacular]

I reluctantly voted for the loser...

You should do some soul searching that you could vote for that destruction. I mean, what's even the point?

[rmt]

as typical black-hearted rightwingnutjob, you wouldn't be empathetic if your kids lives depended on it.

I have to take care of my own before worrying about others, and every dollar that goes toward feeding/clothing/educating/legal costs for those children is a dollar less that is spent on OUR American kids. I fear that you will be disappointed if you are hoping that moms are going to vote for illegal families at the border over their own kids (economy).

[Spurtacular]

Bad News For Republicans As Moms Have Turned On Trump Over Border Child Kidnapping


https://media3.s-nbcnews.com/j/newscms/2018_30/2510191/net_approval_of_trump_by_issue_mothers_of_children _under_18_fathers_of_children_under_18_no_kids_cur rently_in_household_chartbuilder_fdd39ca9f00e82f50 5c61e5aa44be11b.nbcnews-ux-600-480.png

https://www.politicususa.com/2018/07/26/mothers-have-completely-turned-on-trump-over-border-child-kidnapping.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+politicususa%2FfJAl+%28Politi cus+USA+%29

Have you ever heard of weights and measures? Maybe, you should go to college, son.

[boutons_deux]

I have to take care of my own before worrying about others, and every dollar that goes toward feeding/clothing/educating/legal costs for those children is a dollar less that is spent on OUR American kids. I fear that you will be disappointed if you are hoping that moms are going to vote for illegal families at the border over their own kids (economy).

by voting Repug, costs you nothing, and confirms you support Trash's family destruction and child torture policies

[rmt]

by voting Repug, costs you nothing, and confirms you support Trash's family destruction and child torture policies

I think that America has more than enough of ITS OWN family destruction to worry about (see high rate of [absent] "fatherless" children) than to be voting FOR MORE illegal people crossing the border.

[Chris]

Ill be happy to vote Republican if you guys give me a better candidate.
Democrats dont have my loyalty like the Lakers or Cowboys.
Best candidate or least repulsive like 2016 will get my vote.

Trump will win in 2020 so no point in voting unless you are voting for Trump imo.

[Spurtacular]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTw9D9SyjJk&t=97s

[Spurtacular]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j37ehtK2pQQ

[Winehole23]

soccer dads could be key


In 2014 (http://www.cnn.com/election/2014/results/race/house/#exit-polls), Independent men gave Republicans a 19-point advantage, while Independent women gave the GOP only a four-point edge. That yields a 15-point difference—the gender gap among Independent voters. This year (https://www.cnn.com/election/2018/exit-polls), Independent men voted for Democrats by a seven-point margin, while Democrats carried Independent women by 17 points. The Independent gender gap, however, shrunk from 15 to 10 points. That’s because, while women moved 21 points in the Democrats’ favor, men moved 26 points. Independent voters from both sexes shifted blue, but men shifted substantially more.https://www.city-journal.org/independent-male-voter

[rmt]

soccer dads could be key

https://www.city-journal.org/independent-male-voter

I don't know about the conclusion of this article. On one hand it says why midterms are different from presidential elections and on the other hand, it says GOP need to show difference between 2020 choices (one of whom we don't know who is yet). But lol at the comments.

[Winehole23]

City Journal leans rights, is associated with the Manhattan Institute, fwiw.

[Winehole23]

California moves up its 2020 primary, should thin out the Democratic field some.


Early voting in California’s primary will overlap with the traditional early nominating contests in Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina. That could force the sprawling field of Democrats to navigate those states as well as California’s notoriously complex landscape, where campaigning is done through paid political ads. Strategists estimate it could cost at least $5 million for a candidate to compete in California, an amount that could be prohibitive for all but the best-funded contenders. Nascent campaigns are asking themselves if they should gamble on California.https://www.apnews.com/b58e7841a89b4535bccb122e8c1bcf5b

[General Virtue]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHQTB5AgO0M

[pgardn]

Virtue touting Trump...

Wow.

[Winehole23]

Justin Amash is considering running for President as a libertarian.

https://amp.detroitnews.com/amp/2987869001

[Thread]

Justin Amash is considering running for President as a libertarian.

https://amp.detroitnews.com/amp/2987869001

Bless his Jill Stein'ed heart.

[Spurtacular]

Justin Amash is considering running for President as a libertarian.

https://amp.detroitnews.com/amp/2987869001

Blakehole hoping the libertarian gonna pick off votes for Creepy Joe. :lol

[Spurtacular]

Authoritarian Left ruining lives / making kids cry.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=7&v=W0qprnX7m9E&feature=emb_lo go

[Winehole23]

Blakehole hoping the libertarian gonna pick off votes for Creepy Joe. :lol
Can't think of anybody more deserving of a third party spoiler than DJT.

[Spurtacular]

Can't think of anybody more deserving of a third party spoiler than DJT.

:lol I called it.
:lol Obscure hope and a prayer.

[Spurtacular]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vdt5utR8l0k

[Winehole23]

:lol I called it.
:lol Obscure hope and a prayer.Trump isn't doing himself any favors shitting his pants on TV for two hours a day. Old man is doing himself in, tbh. His bullshit artist routine isn't well suited to the high stakes.

[Spurtacular]

Trump isn't doing himself any favors shitting his pants on TV for two hours a day. Old man is doing himself in, tbh. His bullshit artist routine isn't well suited to the high stakes.

You know as well as I do that we're only talking about snowflakes like you crying to your preset tunes with that.

[Winehole23]

You know as well as I do that we're only talking about snowflakes like you crying to your preset tunes with that.Lotta people with nothing to so at home who usually don't pay much attention to politics or press conferences are watching the President beclown himself daily. For his own sake he really should stop.

[Spurtacular]

Lotta people with nothing to so at home who usually don't pay much attention to politics or press conferences are watching the President beclown himself daily. For his own sake he really should stop.

They would be tuning out, not tuning in. Don't be mad that Trump is winning, blakehole. It happens.

[RandomGuy]

They would be tuning out, not tuning in. Don't be mad that Trump is winning, blakehole. It happens.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA.

Eat it.

[Reck]

Don't really see anyone on either side challenging him tbh. Oprah? :lmao

His approval rating is already 7 percentage points higher than Obama's was at this time during his tenure. I'm sure people like Jill Stein and maybe even Bernie Sanders may try to cash in one more time, but it's not going to matter.

I don't see the Democratic Party recovering after all is said and done with the multiple investigations and their recent bankruptcy. The Dems have been soiled with Radical Socialism and those kinds of stains are hard to wash out. The Information Age has not been kind to the Democrats either now that we have a clear picture on the history of their party. People like Dinesh D'Souza and Ben Shapiro are the real patriots enduring endless strife to deliver the uncomfortable truths.

lol Chris running from his own main.

[ChumpDumper]

Don't really see anyone on either side challenging him tbh. Oprah? :lmao

His approval rating is already 7 percentage points higher than Obama's was at this time during his tenure. I'm sure people like Jill Stein and maybe even Bernie Sanders may try to cash in one more time, but it's not going to matter.

I don't see the Democratic Party recovering after all is said and done with the multiple investigations and their recent bankruptcy. The Dems have been soiled with Radical Socialism and those kinds of stains are hard to wash out. The Information Age has not been kind to the Democrats either now that we have a clear picture on the history of their party. People like Dinesh D'Souza and Ben Shapiro are the real patriots enduring endless strife to deliver the uncomfortable truths.


Shapiro is a grifter
:lmao Qhris

[Ef-man]

:lmao Qhris

Guess qchrisy could not handle the Shapiro truth.

:lol

[Spurs Homer]

:lol:lol:lol:lol:lol