Main reason of new US nuclear doctrine: US carriers are now floating bathtubs

[hater]

The US has known this for a while. The fact that new Russian/Chinese hypersonic cruise missiles render US carriers into floating ducks. Because US has no defense against such weapons that fly at cruise algorythms and at speeds 5 times speed of sound.

This is the main reason US has recently updated their nuclear doctrine to say they have the right to respond to a conventional attack with nukes. They did not want to be put in the possition of losing a couple of carriers and then being forced to basically wave the white flag and call all carriers back home.

Releasing the new doctrine makes them ready for such event and they would wash their hands with it after nuking a dozen chinese or russian cities. Of course the doctrine does not take into account that most likely they would retaliate and it would mean the nd of civilization. But perhaps they can respond to any other country not named china or russia with success. Like Iran or N Korea

Question is. Is it a bit irresponsible of US to have our thousands of boys conducting missions in the cariers which basically could get sunk by a single missile??

Why keep the expansionism? Why not cut back until you develop proper protection??

This is why also probably congress basically handed the pentagon a trillion dollars and told them dont come back until you have a solution to this “problem”

But why not call back our boys in the meantime???

[pgardn]

The US has known this for a while. The fact that new Russian/Chinese hypersonic cruise missiles render US carriers into floating ducks. Because US has no defense against such weapons that fly at cruise algorythms and at speeds 5 times speed of sound.

This is the main reason US has recently updated their nuclear doctrine to say they have the right to respond to a conventional attack with nukes. They did not want to be put in the possition of losing a couple of carriers and then being forced to basically wave the white flag and call all carriers back home.

Releasing the new doctrine makes them ready for such event and they would wash their hands with it after nuking a dozen chinese or russian cities. Of course the doctrine does not take into account that most likely they would retaliate and it would mean the nd of civilization. But perhaps they can respond to any other country not named china or russia with success. Like Iran or N Korea

Question is. Is it a bit irresponsible of US to have our thousands of boys conducting missions in the cariers which basically could get sunk by a single missile??

Why keep the expansionism? Why not cut back until you develop proper protection??

This is why also probably congress basically handed the pentagon a trillion dollars and told them dont come back until you have a solution to this “problem”

But why not call back our boys in the meantime???

So who will sink the carriers?

[sickdsm]

Why keep the expansionism? Why not cut back until you develop proper protection??



Assume you voted for Ron Paul for prez

[hater]

Why keep the expansionism? Why not cut back until you develop proper protection??



Assume you voted for Ron Paul for prez

:tu ma niga

Btw Dear Dr Paul just today:

971603835318923264

Looks good too. Oh what coulda been

[hater]

Btw Ron Paul talks on Russian media a lot. Nobody ever accuses him of being a russian stooge

Nobody can question Dear Dr Pauls love for his country :cry

[Chris]

Ron Paul never had a chance with Obama Era deep state and Media. We agree on two things: ending the Federal Banking system and bringing the troops home. His son is going to audit the Fed which is a good start.

[SnakeBoy]

So who will sink the carriers?

Russia & China will destroy them using their non-functional hypersonic missiles...then shit gets real I suppose.

[hater]

They probably designed them to break nonfunctional US air defenses :lmao

[pgardn]

Russia & China will destroy them using their non-functional hypersonic missiles...then shit gets real I suppose.

And....

If they did attempt to use a functional system and sink a carrier... well, they won't.

Hater does not get that there are currently two kinds of conflicts. Conventional and nuclear. So far everything stays conventional. There are some acts that would lead to nuclear. We are not going to sink Russian or Chinese Aircraft carriers. They will not sink ours. Because that... Leads to nasty.

He does not get it.
If he could just stick to waste and wars we should have never entered in hindsight. And of course he never mentions proxy wars except when the US plays this game. He never even mentions proxy conflicts that Russia and China are both involved in. Superpowers doing superpower things but saying they are not. Except WE point them all out.

Because WE have a nongovernmental run press. WE can debate this, because WE have access to info. Now the choice of info and how we wish to present it, that's a problem, a GOOD problem.

Do you get this Hater?

[CosmicCowboy]

Was in Hawaii a couple of years ago when that giant floating early warning/tracking radar thing was in Pearl getting worked on. Freaking thing is huge.

[boutons_deux]

35 years ago, obvious that all navy vessels will always be sitting ducks

https://youtu.be/IUZu8bvxJs4