View Full Version : McMaster out
baseline bum
03-22-2018, 05:36 PM
So much for the Dear Leader's claim it was fake news
clambake
03-22-2018, 05:44 PM
i'm tellin ya, hannity is gonna be a 4 star general, soon.
baseline bum
03-22-2018, 05:46 PM
i'm tellin ya, hannity is gonna be a 4 star general, soon.
If Cunty Ann Conway can be the opioid czar it wouldn't surprise me to see Hannity running the EPA, Dept of Energy, or as Secretary of State, or maybe a Supreme Court nominee.
Chris
03-22-2018, 06:03 PM
Bolton in :tu
spurraider21
03-22-2018, 06:06 PM
:lol
976950187997442048
Bolton in :tu
Wars good now.
Dude wants to nuke North Korea. :lol Chris
976956717929058307
boutons_deux
03-22-2018, 06:36 PM
extreme neocon and Imperial hater-of-the-rest-of-world John Bolton, and his mousse-tache, will be NatSec Advisor
No surprise if neocons get Israel and Saudis to attack Iran, sometime after Trash withdraws USA from Iran agreement in May.
boutons_deux
03-22-2018, 07:01 PM
The scariest things John Bolton has said
Trump’s new national security adviser really, really wants to bomb Iran and North Korea.
https://i2.wp.com/thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/gettyimages-923076450.jpg?resize=1280%2C720px&ssl=1
On bombing Iran
“The inescapable conclusion is that Iran will not negotiate away its nuclear program. Nor will sanctions block its building a broad and deep weapons infrastructure,” Bolton wrote in a 2015 New York Times column headlined, “To Stop Iran’s Bomb, Bomb Iran (https://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/26/opinion/to-stop-irans-bomb-bomb-iran.html).”
“The inconvenient truth is that only military action like Israel’s 1981 attack on Saddam Hussein’s Osirak reactor in Iraq or its 2007 destruction of a Syrian reactor, designed and built by North Korea, can accomplish what is required. Time is terribly short, but a strike can still succeed.”
On bombing North Korea
“Pre-emption opponents argue that action is not justified because Pyongyang does not constitute an ‘imminent threat.’ They are wrong. The threat is imminent, and the case against pre-emption rests on the misinterpretation of a standard that derives from prenuclear, pre-ballistic-missile times,” Bolton wrote last month in a Wall Street Journal column headlined, “The Legal Case for Striking North Korea First (https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-legal-case-for-striking-north-korea-first-1519862374).”
“Given the gaps in U.S. intelligence about North Korea, we should not wait until the very last minute. That would risk striking after the North has deliverable nuclear weapons, a much more dangerous situation.”
On the war in Iraq
“We are confident that Saddam Hussein has hidden weapons of mass destruction and production facilities in Iraq,” Bolton said in 2002 while serving as President George W. Bush’s under secretary of state for Arms Control and International Security.
There were not, of course, hidden weapons of mass destruction and production facilities in Iraq, but in 2015, Bolton said he had no regrets.
On Syrian refugees
“We have no obligation to bring them into this country,” Bolton said in an interview with Fox News in 2015 (https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/barbara-hollingsworth/former-un-ambassador-us-has-no-obligation-accept-syrian-refugees).
On ‘provocative’ presidents
“We have a president who believes that our strength is provocative, only if we were less pushy, less American even,” Bolton said of Obama in 2012 (http://www.tampabay.com/news/politics/stateroundup/former-un-ambassador-john-bolton-accuses-president-barack-obama-of/1248816).
“But it is American weakness that’s provocative and we have a very provocative president in the White House.”
https://thinkprogress.org/scariest-things-john-bolton-said-1d7911538261/
boutons_deux
03-22-2018, 07:04 PM
Donald J. Trump (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump)
(https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump)✔@realDonaldTrump (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump)
All former Bush administration officials should have zero standing on Syria.
Iraq was a waste of blood & treasure.
2:41 PM - Sep 5, 2013 (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/375705302382817281)
Iraq neocon with no regrets about Iraq fiasco is now Trash's natsec guy
Bolton is the biggest Iraq war promoting, pro-war hawk in America. Brilliant pick, lol.
hater
03-22-2018, 07:13 PM
Israhell must b ready for the Syria/Lebanon/Iran bombing
John Bloodton will have our kids die for the state of Israel
Joseph Kony
03-22-2018, 07:25 PM
you cant make this shit up man :lol how do trumptards even keep track of all this bullshit? must be migraine inducing to try and figure out how to spin trump contradicting himself :lmao
boutons_deux
03-22-2018, 07:32 PM
Bolton promised Trash he wouldn't start a war :lol
Bolton promised Trash he wouldn't start a war :lol
That’s very reassuring.
boutons_deux
03-22-2018, 07:42 PM
Trash doesn't like Bolton's mousse-tache, they be off to bad start.
I figure Federalist Soc. proposed Bolton and/or the MIC
monosylab1k
03-22-2018, 08:44 PM
:lol
976950187997442048
:lmao
baseline bum
03-22-2018, 08:46 PM
you cant make this shit up man :lol how do trumptards even keep track of all this bullshit? must be migraine inducing to try and figure out how to spin trump contradicting himself :lmao
This is the guy who ran on universal healthcare and said it could cost $12 a year. Once you look past that one anything else pales in comparison.
Isitjustme?
03-22-2018, 09:35 PM
This is the guy who ran on universal healthcare and said it could cost $12 a year. Once you look past that one anything else pales in comparison.
No way? Really?
Chris
03-22-2018, 09:42 PM
Wars good now.
What wars are going to happen under Bolton?
baseline bum
03-22-2018, 10:14 PM
No way? Really?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2017/07/20/what-was-trump-talking-about-with-12-a-year-health-insurance/?utm_term=.bfbc1564765b
QUOTE #1 from dipshit president:
As they get something, it gets tougher. Because politically, you can’t give it away. So preexisting conditions are a tough deal. Because you are basically saying from the moment the insurance, you’re 21 years old, you start working and you’re paying $12 a year for insurance, and by the time you’re 70, you get a nice plan. Here’s something where you walk up and say, “I want my insurance.” It’s a very tough deal, but it is something that we’re doing a good job of.
QUOTE #2 from dipshit president:
[W]e’re putting in $8bn [to a high-risk coverage pool] and you’re going to have absolute coverage. You’re going to have absolute guaranteed coverage. You’re going to have it if you’re a person going in … don’t forget, this was not supposed to be the way insurance works. Insurance is, you’re 20 years old, you just graduated from college, and you start paying $15 a month for the rest of your life and by the time you’re 70, and you really need it, you’re still paying the same amount and that’s really insurance.
hater
03-22-2018, 11:08 PM
What wars are going to happen under Bolton?
Probably a few in the name of Israel
But still better than Shillary IMO
Shillary was John Bloodton on PCP
Isitjustme?
03-22-2018, 11:15 PM
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2017/07/20/what-was-trump-talking-about-with-12-a-year-health-insurance/?utm_term=.bfbc1564765b
QUOTE #1 from dipshit president:
As they get something, it gets tougher. Because politically, you can’t give it away. So preexisting conditions are a tough deal. Because you are basically saying from the moment the insurance, you’re 21 years old, you start working and you’re paying $12 a year for insurance, and by the time you’re 70, you get a nice plan. Here’s something where you walk up and say, “I want my insurance.” It’s a very tough deal, but it is something that we’re doing a good job of.
QUOTE #2 from dipshit president:
[W]e’re putting in $8bn [to a high-risk coverage pool] and you’re going to have absolute coverage. You’re going to have absolute guaranteed coverage. You’re going to have it if you’re a person going in … don’t forget, this was not supposed to be the way insurance works. Insurance is, you’re 20 years old, you just graduated from college, and you start paying $15 a month for the rest of your life and by the time you’re 70, and you really need it, you’re still paying the same amount and that’s really insurance.
Lmao. He literally knows nothing about anything that hes doing
baseline bum
03-22-2018, 11:20 PM
Lmao. He literally knows nothing about anything that hes doing
Pretty much. Our nation is run by a low information conspiracy theorist.
boutons_deux
03-23-2018, 06:35 AM
Neocons handing Trash extremists to start war on Iran
Pompeo’s rise will make Mideast war more likely
The newly nominated secretary of state, Mike Pompeo, is a foreign policy hawk who opposes the Iran nuclear deal.
In 2015, Pompeo voted against a deal that the Obama administration negotiated (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2015/07/15/transcript-obamas-news-conference-on-the-iran-nuclear-deal/) to remove some international economic sanctions on Iran.
In exchange, Iran would significantly scale back its nuclear program and submit to intrusive international inspections.
Tillerson’s departure means the Iran nuclear deal is in trouble.
And if Trump scraps it, I fear the whole Middle East could erupt in conflict.
Perhaps most importantly, though, Tillerson defied Trump on Iran.
Trump has been highly critical of the international nuclear agreement since his 2016 presidential campaign (https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/13/us/politics/trump-iran-nuclear-deal.html), calling it “the worst deal ever negotiated (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-trump-iran/trump-election-puts-iran-nuclear-deal-on-shaky-ground-idUSKBN13427E).”
backing out of the nuclear deal would destabilize the Middle East – and potentially put the world at risk – because Iran would likely react by restarting its nuclear program.
Secretary of Defense James Mattis agreed with Tillerson on Iran.
The two of them periodically lobbied the president not to scrap the deal (https://www.timesofisrael.com/despite-threats-trump-to-extend-sanctions-relief-for-iran-sources/), and their influence got the agreement recertified in July 2017.
To Trump, Tillerson’s stance on Iran (http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/tillerson-pompeo-2032236124) wasn’t just a difference of opinion – it was, perhaps, an act of disloyalty.
As a congressman, Pompeo opposed the Obama-era Iran agreement as “unconscionable,” (https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/with-mike-pompeo-at-the-state-department-are-the-uber-hawks-winning) and he said after Trump’s election that he was looking forward to “rolling it back.” Pompeo – with whom, Trump reports, he has very good chemistry (https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/mar/13/pompeo-trump-developed-chemistry-daily-briefings/) – is also
on record saying that Iran is “intent on destroying America (https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/13/mike-pompeo-on-national-security-issues.html).”
https://www.salon.com/2018/03/23/pompeos-rise-will-make-mideast-war-more-likely_partner/
Will Trash, Bolton, Pompeo, with Israel and Saudi Arabia, start the Iran war in time for 2020, so Trash can run as "war so-called Pres"?
hater
03-23-2018, 06:49 AM
Pretty much. Our nation is run by a low information conspiracy theorist.
Previously it was run by a low information moron and then by a low information cheerleader in chief
boutons_deux
03-23-2018, 07:02 AM
Trump’s Next National Security Adviser, John Bolton, Is As Dangerous As You Remembered
One of the most notorious advocates for the Iraq War is set to advise the president on U.S. foreign policy.
Bolton is a notoriously hawkish former United Nations ambassador whose views don’t even align with the isolationist foreign policy platform on which Trump campaigned ―
He has called for bombing Iran (https://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/26/opinion/to-stop-irans-bomb-bomb-iran.html) and North Korea (https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-legal-case-for-striking-north-korea-first-1519862374).
This does not bode well for diplomatic efforts, such as Trump’s apparent plan to meet with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un (https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-kim-jong-un-north-korea_us_5aa1c72ee4b01b9b0a39a2db).
In fact, Bolton said on Fox News earlier this month that he
predicts the meeting will fail ― which he suggested would likely lead to military action.
And last month, Bolton made a strong case for a strike on North Korea. In an op-ed published in The Wall Street Journal (https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-legal-case-for-striking-north-korea-first-1519862374) titled “The Legal Case For Striking North Korea First,”
he argued there were no legal reasons against a pre-emptive strike by the U.S.:
The threat is imminent, and
the case against pre-emption rests on the misinterpretation of a standard that derives from prenuclear, pre-ballistic-missile times.
Given the gaps in U.S. intelligence about North Korea, we should not wait until the very last minute.
That would risk striking after the North has deliverable nuclear weapons, a much more dangerous situation.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/john-bolton-foreign-policy-history_us_5aaa8f31e4b045cd0a6f7926?utm_medium=ema il&utm_campaign=__TheMorningEmail__032318&utm_content=__TheMorningEmail__032318+CID_b41ba846 a4596bfd53db8a21ddab4b6c&utm_source=Email%20marketing%20software&utm_term=HuffPost&ncid=newsltushpmgnews__TheMorningEmail__032318
DeadlyDynasty
03-23-2018, 08:52 AM
We need another war, tbh. If for nothing else, then to have something of substance to talk about in the PoFo.
RandomGuy
03-23-2018, 09:08 AM
So much for the Dear Leader's claim it was fake news
Make not mistake, we are careening towards war. Bolton has advocated for attacking Iran. A country with a population 4 times that of Iraq, and an economy 16 times larger, with an Army that will not run when faced with combat.
Bolton is the worst kind of ignorant fool, who thinks he is more informed and better at everything than he actually is.
We have a White House playing out the Donning Kruger effect, but with nuclear weapons, and the lives of our soldiers in their hands.
Pavlov
03-23-2018, 11:21 AM
https://media.giphy.com/media/ckJF8DjNeaF7gOAdEY/giphy.gif
RandomGuy
03-23-2018, 11:26 AM
Previously it was run by a low information moron and then by a low information cheerleader in chief
Is it ok for Putin to kill his critics? Does that make him a great, strong leader?
RandomGuy
03-23-2018, 11:27 AM
Probably a few in the name of Israel
But still better than Shillary IMO
Shillary was John Bloodton on PCP
What about Putins wars? How many people did he kill in Chechnya?
Is it ok for Putin to kill his critics?
koriwhat
03-23-2018, 02:17 PM
good... no need for leakers/rats in the WH.
good... no need for leakers/rats in the WH.
An attention seeker self-promoter like Bolton will undoubtedly leak to the press
koriwhat
03-23-2018, 03:35 PM
An attention seeker self-promoter like Bolton will undoubtedly leak to the press
time will tell. i don't think bolton was the answer to mcmaster but whatever.
Chris
03-23-2018, 05:02 PM
Word on the street is McMaster worked for think tank funded by Russia,China, and Soros Open Society while he was in the army.
Word on the street is McMaster worked for think tank funded by Russia,China, and Soros Open Society while he was in the army.
Chrism.
Pavlov
03-23-2018, 05:04 PM
Word on the street is McMaster worked for think tank funded by Russia,China, and Soros Open Society while he was in the army.Are you just afraid to post your moonbat links anymore?
Chris
03-23-2018, 05:07 PM
Are you just afraid to post your moonbat links anymore?
Computer is down right now. I should have it working soon though since I'm a DIY kind of guy. :tu
Pavlov
03-23-2018, 05:09 PM
Computer is down right now. I should have it working soon though since I'm a DIY kind of guy. :tuJust name the website/blog/tweet you got it from.
Chris
03-23-2018, 05:13 PM
Word is McMaster was on thin ice a year ago but Gen. Kelly saved his job. Trump + Bolton = de-nuclearization of NoKo :tu
clambake
03-23-2018, 05:19 PM
Word is McMaster was on thin ice a year ago but Gen. Kelly saved his job. Trump + Bolton = de-nuclearization of NoKo :tu
yeah, kim gonna give up them nukes lol
Word is McMaster was on thin ice a year ago but Gen. Kelly saved his job. Trump + Bolton = de-nuclearization of NoKo :tu
Using nukes on Pyeongyang =|= de-nuclearization of NoKo tbh.
Btw, how's the twitter feed lookin these days, citizen X?
Chris
03-23-2018, 05:37 PM
Using nukes on Pyeongyang =|= de-nuclearization tbh of NoKo.
Btw, how's the twitter feed lookin these days, citizen X?
Computer is down no twitter for now since iPhone twitter app is shit. Thanks for your concern though. :tu
Computer is down no twitter for now since iPhone twitter app is shit. Thanks for your concern though. :tu
Thoughts + Prayers to you and your loved ones
Chris
03-24-2018, 11:38 AM
977566929106952192
977566929106952192
Does he also mean Trump?
Chris
03-24-2018, 12:50 PM
Does he also mean Trump?
No.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.