CNN: Jeff Sessions say second special counsel

[djohn2oo8]

Not needed :lmao

979464167580106758

[dabom]

:lmao TSA Chris @anyotherrepugfaggot. :lmao

[RandomGuy]

Twit-storm from Pussy-Grabber McPornstarpayout in 3.... 2.... 1...

[djohn2oo8]

Chris had saved up his hopes and dreams just to be destroyed. Thoughts and prayers.

[spurraider21]

:lol coulda avoided the mueller special counsel appointment if he just didn't fire comey like an idiot

[RandomGuy]

Chris had saved up his hopes and dreams just to be destroyed. Thoughts and prayers.

thoughts and prayer man.

[TSA]

Not needed :lmao

979464167580106758

Another case of djohn not reading past the headline of a tweet :rollin

A second special counsel isn't needed because Sessions already assigned senior Federal prosecutors to work in cooperation with the Inspector General, specifically United States Attorney John W. Huber. The additional matters raised by Grassley, Goodlatte, and Gowdy fall within the scope of Huber's existing mandate.

djohn once again with the self inflicted wound

zUyqDxa2k3w

[djohn2oo8]

Oh I guess the FBI abuse and misconduct wasn't as egregious as TSA thought :lmao

[TSA]

Oh I guess the FBI abuse and misconduct wasn't as egregious as TSA thought :lmao

You still haven't read the actual letter from Sessions have you? :lol

[djohn2oo8]

After reading the request for a 2nd special counsel I’m actually on board. Horowitz doesn’t have the authority to investigate former employees of the DOJ/FBI. Too many involved have already been forced out or resigned. Every single one of them needs to be investigated and held accountable.

Weren't you just on board for a 2nd special counsel? :lmao

[TSA]

Weren't you just on board for a 2nd special counsel? :lmao

Sure. And after reading Sessions response it isn't needed as he already has a team of Federal prosecutors working in cooperation with the Inspector General. You still haven't read the actual letter from Sessions have you? :lol

[Pavlov]

TSA thinks Huber is some kind of de facto Special Counsel.

[djohn2oo8]

TSA thinks Huber is some kind of de facto Special Counsel.

lmao goalposts are swaying back and forth in the wind.

[baseline bum]

How will Trump take this?

Prob up the ass

[Pavlov]

And having lawyers working with the Inspector General is some kind of extraordinary action.

Sessions just told those idiots he was conducting a real investigation and doesn't need to appoint Special Counsel Jeanine Pirro.

[TSA]

lmao goalposts are swaying back and forth in the wind.

Have you read the actual letter from Sessions yet?

[Expert]

Sessions good now

[Pavlov]

Sessions good nowI haven't had many complaints about him RE: the Trump/Russia investigation tbh.

I know you have no actual take.

[Reck]

TSA didn't waste any time spinning this into a master mind game type move. :lmao poor faggot.

[Expert]

chirp

[Expert]

TSA didn't waste any time spinning this into a master mind game type move. :lmao poor faggot.

Tyranny is just a an additional Y from being tranny.

[Pavlov]

chirpNo take whatsoever.

[TSA]

TSA didn't waste any time spinning this into a master mind game type move. :lmao poor faggot.

There's nothing to spin. I simply summarized the letter that tweedledum failed to read before he prematurely blew his load like he always does.

[TSA]

This just gets better and better.

Huber was appointed by Barack Obama in 2015. So now we've got investigation called for by Democrats being run by an Obama appointed Inspector General working alongside an Obama appointed Federal prosecutor. The left has painted themselves into a corner and there's no crying bias now. :lol

[Pavlov]

This just gets better and better.

Huber was appointed by Barack Obama in 2015. So now we've got investigation called for by Democrats being run by an Obama appointed Inspector General working alongside an Obama appointed Federal prosecutor. The left has painted themselves into a corner and there's no crying bias now. :lolJust like there never was with Mueller. :lol

[Reck]

Tyranny is just a an additional Y from being tranny.

A an. What's the matter tubby, those fat ass burger fingers getting in the way?

[Pavlov]

"Expert" is just one take away from having one take.

[TSA]

Just like there never was with Mueller. :lol

Too bad some of Mueller's team were removed for bias :lol

[TSA]

979469350125146114

thread

[Pavlov]

Too bad some of Mueller's team were removed for bias :lol:lol mean texts

[Pavlov]

979469350125146114

threadDude Seesions asked to determine whether there should be a second Special Counsel determines there should not be a second Special Counsel.

[Reck]

979469350125146114

thread

There is no such thing as a secret prosecutor.

[TSA]

Dude Seesions asked to determine whether there should be a second Special Counsel determines there should not be a second Special Counsel.

You're flustered and not making sense, try again.

[djohn2oo8]

There is no such thing as a secret prosecutor.

lordy! Pizza sex shops and now secret prosecutors.

[Pavlov]

You're flustered and not making sense, try again.You're flustered and can't comprehend a simple sentence. Try again.

[djohn2oo8]

You're flustered and can't comprehend a simple sentence. Try again.
:lmao

[Spurtacular]

Sure. And after reading Sessions response it isn't needed as he already has a team of Federal prosecutors working in cooperation with the Inspector General. You still haven't read the actual letter from Sessions have you? :lol

Internal review is just code for, "it's getting buried." The optics is not good for Sessions. Trump needs to get rid of his sorry ass. He's dead weight.

[TSA]

You're flustered and can't comprehend a simple sentence. Try again.

No your sentence makes no sense. Try again. What are you trying to say?

[TSA]

Internal review is just code for, "it's getting buried." The optics is not good for Sessions. Trump needs to get rid of his sorry ass. He's dead weight.

You're clueless.

[Pavlov]

No your sentence makes no sense. Try again. What are you trying to say?Everyone else who read it gets it. You're failing. Try again.

[TSA]

Everyone else who read it gets it. You're failing. Try again.

"Sessions asked to determine whether there should be a second Special Counsel determines there should not be a second Special Counsel"

that doesn't make sense. Can you clarify what you are trying to say?

[Pavlov]

"Sessions asked to determine whether there should be a second Special Counsel determines there should not be a second Special Counsel"

that doesn't make sense. Can you clarify what you are trying to say?You're so flustered you can't even correctly quote me.

Try quoting me again. Do it correctly this time.

[Reck]

You're clueless.

Actually for once, Spurtacular is making sense and for the most part of that post, I agree with him.

Sorry you're not able to see it for what it is. Not everything has an angle and not everything has to have a conspiracy behind it.

[Spurtacular]

You're clueless.

I'm a realist. Sessions is incompetent at best; part of the corruption at worst. I'll argue against the Democrats and their BS all day long; but I ain't carrying water for sycophants like Sessions.

[Spurtacular]

Actually for once, Spurtacular is making sense and for the most part of that post, I agree with him.

Sorry you're not able to see it for what it is. Not everything has an angle and not everything has to have a conspiracy behind it.

I always make sense, tranny. You're only saying I am in this case cos it goes in favor of what you've been programmed for.

[Pavlov]

I'm a realist. Sessions is incompetent at best; part of the corruption at worst. I'll argue against the Democrats and their BS all day long; but I ain't carrying water for sycophants like Sessions.For whom is Sessions a sycophant?

[TSA]

Actually for once, Spurtacular is making sense and for the most part of that post, I agree with him.

Sorry you're not able to see it for what it is. Not everything has an angle and not everything has to have a conspiracy behind it.

OIG reports don’t get buried. You’re as clueless as Spurt.

[Reck]

I always make sense, tranny. You're only saying I am in this case cos it goes in favor of what you've been programmed for.

I dont see how him getting fired goes well for my and really the American interest really.

In firing Sessions, he can appoint a stooge that will do his bidding and fire Mueller. But that's an entirely different problem for Trump if he does.

That's the part of your post I dont agree with.

[TSA]

You're so flustered you can't even correctly quote me.

Try quoting me again. Do it correctly this time.

I dropped the dude and corrected your spelling of Sessions. If you don’t want to clarify your word salad just say so but I was genuinely curious what you were trying to say.

[Chris]

CNN :lol

dodgerjohn :lol

dabom :lol

spurraider21 :lol

RandomGay :lol

Reck :lol

Pavlov :lol

[djohn2oo8]

CNN :lol

dodgerjohn :lol

dabom :lol

spurraider21 :lol

RandomGay :lol

Reck :lol

Pavlov :lol

Still no 2nd special counsel :lol

[Pavlov]

I dropped the dudeTurns out that is critical to understanding the sentence. No wonder you're flustered and making quoting errors.

Try quoting me again. Do it correctly this time.

[dabom]

Still no 2nd special counsel :lol

Damn. :lol

[Pavlov]

CNN :lol

dodgerjohn :lol

dabom :lol

spurraider21 :lol

RandomGay :lol

Reck :lol

Pavlov :lolOnce again, Chris has no idea what happened today.

Why don't you post a fake picture again?

[Reck]

CNN :lol

dodgerjohn :lol

dabom :lol

spurraider21 :lol

RandomGay :lol

Reck :lol

Pavlov :lol

CNN bad now. :lol

[Spurtacular]

For whom is Sessions a sycophant?

Who cares.

[Pavlov]

Who cares.You said he's a sycophant so it's very prominent in your mind.

For whom is Sessions a sycophant?

Or did you not actually know what the word means?

[Spurtacular]

I dont see how him getting fired goes well for my and really the American interest really.

In firing Sessions, he can appoint a stooge that will do his bidding and fire Mueller. But that's an entirely different problem for Trump if he does.

That's the part of your post I dont agree with.

Sessions is doing a poor job. Whatever the next guy does is not based on that reality.

[Spurtacular]

You said he's a sycophant so it's very prominent in your mind.

For whom is Sessions a sycophant?

Or did you not actually know what the word means?

It makes no difference. He's not serving the American public.

[Pavlov]

It makes no difference. He's not serving the American public.You brought it up.

For whom is Sessions a sycophant?

Or did you not actually know what the word means?

[Spurtacular]

You brought it up.

For whom is Sessions a sycophant?

Or did you not actually know what the word means?

What I know is that you got a thrill up your leg about the possibility of getting lost in the weeds.

[Pavlov]

What I know is that you got a thrill up your leg about the possibility of getting lost in the weeds.You brought it up.

For whom is Sessions a sycophant?

Or did you not actually know what the word means?

[boutons_deux]

Trash and Repugs attack the FBI, racist and sycophant loser. acts like Trash's personal attack dog and goes after the FBI trying to save Trash's obese ass.

[pgardn]

The same guy who lied to the senators about meeting with the Russian ambassador during the campaign knowing he was an ardent Trump supporter

"It can never be that the department conceals errors when they occur," Sessions said in the Thursday letter. "I expect person in this department to adhere to the highest level of integrity, ethics and professionalism. If anyone falls short of these high standards, I will fulfill my responsibility to take necessary action to protect the integrity of our work."

Then he has to recuse himself because hes in the middle of it thereby infuriating Trump.

Sessions is such a pitiful lapdog. " I needs my job in government "

Trump gonna test the waters for firing Meuller again. I think he eventually gets it done. The tepid late response response of Paul Ryan, and the late response of McConnell show they were in turn measuring temperatures of fellow Republicans. There was not an immediate condemnation. This is gonna be interesting. Especially after the midterms. If the Republicans make a good showing, Mueller is gone IMO.

[TSA]

The same guy who lied to the senators about meeting with the Russian ambassador during the campaign knowing he was an ardent Trump supporter

"It can never be that the department conceals errors when they occur," Sessions said in the Thursday letter. "I expect person in this department to adhere to the highest level of integrity, ethics and professionalism. If anyone falls short of these high standards, I will fulfill my responsibility to take necessary action to protect the integrity of our work."

Then he has to recuse himself because hes in the middle of it thereby infuriating Trump.

Sessions is such a pitiful lapdog. " I needs my job in government "

Trump gonna test the waters for firing Meuller again. I think he eventually gets it done. The tepid late response response of Paul Ryan, and the late response of McConnell show they were in turn measuring temperatures of fellow Republicans. There was not an immediate condemnation. This is gonna be interesting. Especially after the midterms. If the Republicans make a good showing, Mueller is gone IMO.

Mueller said Sessions didn't lie and wasn't under investigation. The FBI said Sessions didn't need to disclose foreign contacts on his security clearance. What are you rambling about?

[djohn2oo8]

Mueller said Sessions didn't lie and wasn't under investigation. The FBI said Sessions didn't need to disclose foreign contacts on his security clearance. What are you rambling about?

Oh so the FBI good now? Fuck you.

[TSA]

Oh so the FBI good now? Fuck you.

https://media.giphy.com/media/vk7VesvyZEwuI/giphy.gif

[djohn2oo8]

https://media.giphy.com/media/vk7VesvyZEwuI/giphy.gif

One day the FBI is corrupt. The next "But the FBI said". This will turn out just like pizzagate.

[TSA]

There can be corrupt officials within the FBI, that doesn't make the entire FBI corrupt. Not a difficult concept.

[Pavlov]

TSA's goalpost has moved to someone in the FBI being charged with something someday.

[djohn2oo8]

TSA's goalpost has moved to someone in the FBI being charged with something someday.

:lmao

[TSA]

TSA's goalpost has moved to someone in the FBI being charged with something someday.

979122541083029504

:lol someday

McCabe lied to Comey, lied to the FBI OPR, and lied twice to the IG while under oath. Should McCabe be charged criminally yes or no?

[djohn2oo8]

979122541083029504

:lol someday

McCabe lied to Comey, lied to the FBI OPR, and lied twice to the IG while under oath. Should McCabe be charged criminally yes or no?

So Comey good now? Pathetic.

[Pavlov]

979122541083029504

:lol someday

McCabe lied to Comey, lied to the FBI OPR, and lied twice to the IG while under oath. Should McCabe be charged criminally yes or no?You moved your goalpost to Minnesota.

[djohn2oo8]

You moved your goalpost to Minnesota.

:lmao :lmao :lmao

[djohn2oo8]

https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-WVsA1TG3Mhw/UDHgq-tTdqI/AAAAAAAAAes/CLqIGagka54/s800/goalpost2.gif

[TSA]

You moved your goalpost to Minnesota.

The OIG investigation isn't complete I'm not sure why you would expect indictments before that happened.

dodge #1

McCabe lied to Comey, lied to the FBI OPR, and lied twice to the IG while under oath. Should McCabe be charged criminally yes or no?

[djohn2oo8]

https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-WVsA1TG3Mhw/UDHgq-tTdqI/AAAAAAAAAes/CLqIGagka54/s800/goalpost2.gif

Comey good now.

[Pavlov]

The OIG investigation isn't complete I'm not sure why you would expect indictments before that happened.You moved your goalpost to Minnesota. That arrest had nothing to do with anything you ever posted before.


McCabe lied to Comey, lied to the FBI OPR, and lied twice to the IG while under oath. Should McCabe be charged criminally yes or no?Don't know -- whose word are you taking that he lied under all those conditions?

A Republican congressman?

Yes or no.

[TSA]

You moved your goalpost to Minnesota. That arrest had nothing to do with anything you ever posted before.

Don't know -- whose word are you taking that he lied under all those conditions?

A Republican congressman?

Yes or no.

Yes, Jim Jordan read the IG report. Since neither one of us has read it I'll rephrase the question.

If McCabe lied to Comey, lied to the FBI OPR, and lied twice to the IG while under oath should McCabe be charged criminally yes or no?

[TSA]

You moved your goalpost to Minnesota. That arrest had nothing to do with anything you ever posted before.

I posted about Sessions going after leakers before, please reference your ST notebook.

http://money.cnn.com/2017/11/14/media/leak-investigations-jeff-sessions/index.html

[Pavlov]

Yes, Jim Jordan read the IG report. Since neither one of us has read it I'll rephrase the question.

If McCabe lied to Comey, lied to the FBI OPR, and lied twice to the IG while under oath should McCabe be charged criminally yes or no?I don't know the legal thresholds for prosecution in each case.

Do you?

[Pavlov]

I posted about Sessions going after leakers before, please reference your ST notebook.

http://money.cnn.com/2017/11/14/media/leak-investigations-jeff-sessions/index.htmlYeah, this is the guy you have been talking about this whole time.







































In Minnesota.

[TSA]

I don't know the legal thresholds for prosecution in each case.

Do you?

Looks like you'll need to learn the legal thresholds for prosecution in each case and then answer my question.

[Pavlov]

Looks like you'll need to learn the legal thresholds for prosecution in each case and then answer my question.Dodge #1.

Do you know them?

Yes or no.

[TSA]

I don't know the legal thresholds for prosecution in each case.

Do you?

I'm feeling generous on good Friday and did some leg work for you.

"Now I write about another tactic used in the OIG community when interviewing federal employees, whether you are the subject of the investigation or a witness. That tactic is the lie. First, let me remind you that it is essential to tell the truth to the OIG if you elect to answer their questions. Not telling the truth is a felony. It is either perjury (if you are placed under oath) or a false statement under 18 USC 1001 (if not placed under oath), and sometimes both. I’ve seen my share of federal employees prosecuted and sent to prison for not being truthful in an OIG or FBI interview. So if you have any hesitation about being completely truthful to the OIG, get an attorney to assist you in understanding the consequences of your truthful answers or the consequences of not answering questions because you don’t want to provide the OIG with that information."

http://askthelawyer.federaltimes.com/2016/01/13/oig-interviews-they-can-lie-to-you/

If McCabe lied twice to the OIG while under oath should McCabe be charged criminally yes or no?

[Pavlov]

I'm feeling generous on good Friday and did some leg work for you.

"Now I write about another tactic used in the OIG community when interviewing federal employees, whether you are the subject of the investigation or a witness. That tactic is the lie. First, let me remind you that it is essential to tell the truth to the OIG if you elect to answer their questions. Not telling the truth is a felony. It is either perjury (if you are placed under oath) or a false statement under 18 USC 1001 (if not placed under oath), and sometimes both. I’ve seen my share of federal employees prosecuted and sent to prison for not being truthful in an OIG or FBI interview. So if you have any hesitation about being completely truthful to the OIG, get an attorney to assist you in understanding the consequences of your truthful answers or the consequences of not answering questions because you don’t want to provide the OIG with that information."

http://askthelawyer.federaltimes.com/2016/01/13/oig-interviews-they-can-lie-to-you/

If McCabe lied twice to the OIG while under oath should McCabe be charged criminally yes or no?If they make that recommendation, sure.

You seem to think I'm as invested in McCabe, Clinton, Clinton, Rice, Obama, et.al. as you are in Trump, Trump, Trump, Kushner and Flynn.

I've always been fine with letting every investigation run its course. I think they're all good. You've just been waiting for blogs to tell you what to think and how to react to everything.

[Reck]

Ask the lawyer. :lol

[TSA]

Ask the lawyer. :lol

:lol like you don't run to an anonymous 1st year spurstalk lawyer for all your legal questions

[TSA]

If they make that recommendation, sure.

You seem to think I'm as invested in McCabe, Clinton, Clinton, Rice, Obama, et.al. as you are in Trump, Trump, Trump, Kushner and Flynn.

I've always been fine with letting every investigation run its course. I think they're all good. You've just been waiting for blogs to tell you what to think and how to react to everything.

:lol your post count in every thread involving them tells a different story

[Pavlov]

:lol your post count in every thread involving them tells a different storyI like debunking conspiracy theories. My post count in the other conspiracy threads proves that.

What is your latest conspiracy theory regarding Susan Rice btw?

[Reck]

:lol like you don't run to an anonymous 1st year spurstalk lawyer for all your legal questions

About generic lawyer shit, sure.

But you're taking the word of a random lawyer to validate a case that no one knows what the outcome will be. That dude's take on what's gonna happen is as good as anyone's guess here. :lol

[TSA]

I like debunking conspiracy theories. My post count in the other conspiracy threads proves that.

What is your latest conspiracy theory regarding Susan Rice btw?

The conspiracy theory is that Trump colluded with Russia during the election to sway it, what have you done to debunk that?

[Pavlov]

The conspiracy theory is that Trump colluded with Russia during the election to sway it, what have you done to debunk that?I think there was more than enough evidence to merit the current investigation. If it's allowed to run its course without interference, it will debunk whatever conspiracy theory needs debunking, which will more than likely include your various conspiracy theories you have adopted over these past months.

Now what is your conspiracy theory regarding Susan Rice these days?

[djohn2oo8]

The conspiracy theory is that Trump colluded with Russia during the election to sway it, what have you done to debunk that?

It's not a conspiracy theory because Mueller doesn't investigate conspiracy theories. If it were, he would be investigating pizzagate.

[pgardn]

Mueller said Sessions didn't lie and wasn't under investigation. The FBI said Sessions didn't need to disclose foreign contacts on his security clearance. What are you rambling about?

So you did not read what he told the Senate when questioned? He told the Senate he never met with any Russians when in fact he met with the Fckn Russian Ambassador 3 times during the campaign.

What are you rambling on about? Did you read questioned by senators

Sessions is a liar.
.

[Pavlov]

So you did not read what he told the Senate when questioned? He told the Senate he never met with any Russians when in fact he met with the Fckn Russian Ambassador 3 times during the campaign.

What are you rambling on about? Did you read questioned by senators

Sessions is a liar.
.Well that lie was OK.

[pgardn]

The same guy who lied to the senators about meeting with the Russian ambassador during the campaign knowing he was an ardent Trump supporter

"It can never be that the department conceals errors when they occur," Sessions said in the Thursday letter. "I expect person in this department to adhere to the highest level of integrity, ethics and professionalism. If anyone falls short of these high standards, I will fulfill my responsibility to take necessary action to protect the integrity of our work."

.

Read again.

[djohn2oo8]

Well that lie was OK.

Crofl

[TSA]

So you did not read what he told the Senate when questioned? He told the Senate he never met with any Russians when in fact he met with the Fckn Russian Ambassador 3 times during the campaign.

What are you rambling on about? Did you read questioned by senators

Sessions is a liar.
.

Muellers team reviewed his testimony to the senate and said Sessions didn’t lie and was not being investigated.

[TSA]

It's not a conspiracy theory because Mueller doesn't investigate conspiracy theories. If it were, he would be investigating pizzagate.

Mueller was appointed to investigate a conspiracy theory.

[TSA]

I think there was more than enough evidence to merit the current investigation. If it's allowed to run its course without interference, it will debunk whatever conspiracy theory needs debunking, which will more than likely include your various conspiracy theories you have adopted over these past months.

Now what is your conspiracy theory regarding Susan Rice these days?
My thoughts on Susan Rice haven’t changed. Feel free to go through my previous posts.

You claim to debunk conspiracy theories yet you’ve been heavily invested in pushing the Trump/Russia election collusion conspiracy theory. Pick a lane.

[Pavlov]

My thoughts on Susan Rice haven’t changed. Feel free to go through my previous posts.Of course they have. They changed every time a blog told you to change them.

I'm asking you what is your Rice conspiracy theory now.

Don't be shy. Quote a blog if you have to.


You claim to debunk conspiracy theories yet you’ve been heavily invested in pushing the Trump/Russia election collusion conspiracy theory. Pick a lane.It turned out the Republican candidate's son, son-in-law and campaign manager met with Russians to conspire about adoptions.

As I said, there is more than enough evidence to merit the current the investigation. I will be quite pleased to discusss the evidence as it becomes known.

[TSA]

Of course they have. They changed every time a blog told you to change them.

I'm asking you what is your Rice conspiracy theory now.

Don't be shy. Quote a blog if you have to.

It turned out the Republican candidate's son, son-in-law and campaign manager met with Russians to conspire about adoptions.

As I said, there is more than enough evidence to merit the current the investigation. I will be quite pleased to discusss the evidence as it becomes known.

Is there more than enough evidence to merit the OIG’s current investigation into the FBI/DOJ?

[Pavlov]

Is there more than enough evidence to merit the OIG’s current investigation into the FBI/DOJ?The IG exists to do reviews and investigations.

You're acting like I have a problem with it after I explicitly said I have no problem with any of the investigations.

You're currently OK with the Mueller investigation because a blog told you Mueller is working with Trump.

[djohn2oo8]

Mueller was appointed to investigate a conspiracy theory.

No. Mueller was appointed because Trump was a fucking idiot and fired Comey.

[spurraider21]

So Trump fired Comey knowing Rosenstein would appoint Mueller as special counsel so that Mueller can hire a bunch of trump haters and expose corruption in the DOJ

[djohn2oo8]

So Trump fired Comey knowing Rosenstein would appoint Mueller as special counsel so that Mueller can hire a bunch of trump haters and expose corruption in the DOJ

:lmao

[TSA]

The IG exists to do reviews and investigations.

You're acting like I have a problem with it after I explicitly said I have no problem with any of the investigations.

You're currently OK with the Mueller investigation because a blog told you Mueller is working with Trump.

I assumed you had a problem with the IG investigation because you try and debunk everything I post from it while at the same time never even once attempting to debunk the huge amount of bullshit djohn spews concerning the Trump/Russia investigation. Why is that?

[TSA]

No. Mueller was appointed because Trump was a fucking idiot and fired Comey.

That's funny. Rosenstein recommended that Comey be fired.

[djohn2oo8]

That's funny. Rosenstein recommended that Comey be fired.

That's funny. Because Trump said it was his (Trump) decision alone.

[spurraider21]

That's funny. Because Trump said it was his (Trump) decision alone.
Yeah, because of the Rusher thing

[TSA]

That's funny. Because Trump said it was his (Trump) decision alone.

So he should have ignored Rosenstein's memorandum detailing Comey's fuckups? Is Rosenstein good or bad now?

[Reck]

Mueller was appointed to investigate a conspiracy theory.

A conspiracy theory that has had real results and real indictments? Umm ok.

[TSA]

A conspiracy theory that has had real results and real indictments? Umm ok.

The conspiracy theory is that Trump and Russia colluded to sway the election. The indictments have zero to do with Trump and Russia colluding to sway the election.

[Pavlov]

I assumed you had a problem with the IG investigationOops, you were wrong.

the conspiracy theories are yours, not the IG's.

[Pavlov]

That's funny. Rosenstein recommended that Comey be fired.That's funny, he was told to write memos giving reasons to fire and reasons to keep him.

[djohn2oo8]

So he should have ignored Rosenstein's memorandum detailing Comey's fuckups? Is Rosenstein good or bad now?
Trump said the decision was his alone. Not Rosenstein's. Not Sessions. His alone.

[TSA]

Oops, you were wrong.

the conspiracy theories are yours, not the IG's.

That's great you don't have a problem with the IG's investigation. You still didn't answer the question. If you don't have a problem with the IG's investigation why do you try and debunk everything I post from it while at the same time never even once attempting to debunk the huge amount of bullshit djohn spews concerning the Trump/Russia investigation?

[djohn2oo8]

A conspiracy theory that has had real results and real indictments? Umm ok.

He's gotta convince himself. Being wrong about literally everything can take it's toll. You are talking to someone who believed in child sex shops at a pizza parlor.

[djohn2oo8]

That's great you don't have a problem with the IG's investigation. You still didn't answer the question. If you don't have a problem with the IG's investigation why do you try and debunk everything I post from it while at the same time never even once attempting to debunk the huge amount of bullshit djohn spews concerning the Trump/Russia investigation?
How did the Seth Rich conspiracy work out for you?

[TSA]

That's funny, he was told to write memos giving reasons to fire and reasons to keep him.

That's funny, he clearly stands by his decision to recommend firing Comey and seeking a new leader.


"In the days after Comey’s firing, some lawmakers, former Justice officials and people who knew Rosenstein wondered if he had been forced to write the politically charged memo for Trump. But Rosenstein, who was only recently confirmed as the Justice Department’s second-highest ranking official, left no doubt that it was voluntary.

“I wrote it,” Rosenstein said. “I believe it. I stand by it.”

“Notwithstanding my personal affection for Director Comey, I thought it was appropriate to seek a new leader,” Rosenstein said. “I wrote a brief memorandum to the attorney general summarizing my long-standing concerns about Director Comey’s public statements concerning the Secretary Clinton email investigation. I chose the issues to include in my memorandum.”

[TSA]

How did the Seth Rich conspiracy work out for you?

They solved the murder? Please fill me in on the details I somehow missed that.

[djohn2oo8]

They solved the murder? Please fill me in on the details I somehow missed that.

Was your conspiracy proven to be true? Oh no. Okay.

[TSA]

Was your conspiracy proven to be true? Oh no. Okay.

How can a conspiracy be proven true or false when the murder is still unsolved?

[Reck]

The conspiracy theory is that Trump and Russia colluded to sway the election. The indictments have zero to do with Trump and Russia colluding to sway the election.

But they have.

The 13 Russians that got indicted was a direct result of Russia meddling. :lol

And indictments won't stop there. This is an ongoing investigation, if you didn't know.

[djohn2oo8]

How can a conspiracy be proven true or false when the murder is still unsolved?

Sounds like you had no basis, evidence or actual facts for that bullshit theory. Glad to see you admit defeat.

[djohn2oo8]

But they have.

The 13 Russians that got indicted was a direct result of Russia meddling. :lol

And indictments won't stop there. This is an ongoing investigation, if you didn't know.

Oh he declared the Collusion theory dead even though Mueller is investigating it. He is antsy.

[TSA]

But they have.

The 13 Russians that got indicted was a direct result of Russia meddling. :lol

And indictments won't stop there. This is an ongoing investigation, if you didn't know.

No, they haven't. How did Trump collude with the 13 Russians?

[TSA]

Sounds like you had no basis, evidence or actual facts for that bullshit theory. Glad to see you admit defeat.

How can a conspiracy be proven true or false when the murder is still unsolved?

[djohn2oo8]

How can a conspiracy be proven true or false when the murder is still unsolved?

How can collusion theory be decided dead when the investigation is ongoing?

[Reck]

No, they haven't. How did Trump collude with the 13 Russians?

You're ridiculous. How would I know that?

Only Mueller knows/will determine that when his investigation into Russia collusion is finished.

[TSA]

How can collusion theory be decided dead when the investigation is ongoing?

It's dead to me, I don't make decisions for you.

How can a conspiracy be proven true or false when the murder is still unsolved?

[djohn2oo8]

You're ridiculous. How would I know that?

Only Mueller knows/will determine that when his investigation into Russia collusion is finished.

But Trump said "Putin said he didn't meddle"

[djohn2oo8]

It's dead to me, I don't make decisions for you.

How can a conspiracy be proven true or false when the murder is still unsolved?

Oh okay gotcha. So the theory actually isn't dead then.

[Reck]

How can collusion theory be decided dead when the investigation is ongoing?

:lmao

I mean, shit. I want to give TSA the benefit of the doubt and say he's only trolling but past predictions tells me he's not. :lol

[TSA]

You're ridiculous. How would I know that?

Only Mueller knows/will determine that when his investigation into Russia collusion is finished.

You'd know that because the indictments would have mentioned them colluding with the Trump campaign. NONE of the indictments mention Trump or his campaign colluding with Russia during the election.

[djohn2oo8]

:lmao

I mean, shit. I want to give TSA the benefit of the doubt and say he's only trolling but past predictions tells me he's not. :lol

I doubt he can even wipe his own ass.

[TSA]

Oh okay gotcha. So the theory actually isn't dead then.

Not for you it isn't as evidenced by the daily bullshit you continue to post.

How can a conspiracy be proven true or false when the murder is still unsolved?

[djohn2oo8]

You'd know that because the indictments would have mentioned them colluding with the Trump campaign. NONE of the indictments mention Trump or his campaign colluding with Russia during the election.

You think there are no more indictments coming? Or is the investigation ongoing?

[TSA]

I doubt he can even wipe his own ass.

I'll be sure to take some photos of me wiping my ass with the $2000 you send me after Trump, Kushner, Ivanka, and Don Jr all don't go to prison.

[djohn2oo8]

Not for you it isn't as evidenced by the daily bullshit you continue to post.

How can a conspiracy be proven true or false when the murder is still unsolved?

Not bullshit. Those 13 Russians indicted, set the premise that there were crimes committed. And the actual indictment made mention of persons "known and unknown to the grand jury".

[Pavlov]

That's great you don't have a problem with the IG's investigation. You still didn't answer the question. If you don't have a problem with the IG's investigation why do you try and debunk everything I post from it while at the same time never even once attempting to debunk the huge amount of bullshit djohn spews concerning the Trump/Russia investigation?I debunk your conspiracy theories.

Not the IG investigation.

Problem now is you're too chickenshit to even say what crimes you think really happened.

Every conspiracy theorist I've come across here does that.

lol

[TSA]

You think there are no more indictments coming? Or is the investigation ongoing?

More indictments concerning collusion during the election? Why don't you just hope there is one before you start talking about more.

[Reck]

You'd know that because the indictments would have mentioned them colluding with the Trump campaign. NONE of the indictments mention Trump or his campaign colluding with Russia during the election.

Yet.

Do you think Mueller is going to announce everything mid stream without even interviewing Trump? You make Mueller out to be a chump two bit prosecutor. :lol

He's gonna hit Trump when he's ready. And BTW, collusion is not Trump's only problem. There is this obstruction thingy dangling around his neck too.

Mueller is likely to announce all charges at once or he will clear him. Only two options here.

[djohn2oo8]

I'll be sure to take some photos of me wiping my ass with the $2000 you send me after Trump, Kushner, Ivanka, and Don Jr all don't go to prison.
You were this confident before you lost your account too.

[Pavlov]

It's dead to melol message board arbiter of justice

[djohn2oo8]

More indictments concerning collusion during the election? Why don't you just hope there is one before you start talking about more.

You didn't answer the question. Can you say right now, no more indictments coming?

[TSA]

I debunk your conspiracy theories.

Not the IG investigation.

Problem now is you're too chickenshit to even say what crimes you think really happened.

Every conspiracy theorist I've come across here does that.

lol

chickenshit dodge

Why have you never debunked the huge amount of bullshit djohn spews concerning the Trump/Russia investigation?

[Pavlov]

chickenshit dodge

Why have you never debunked the huge amount of bullshit djohn spews concerning the Trump/Russia investigation?Like what, for instance?

[TSA]

You were this confident before you lost your account too.

A name on an account means nothing to me.

[TSA]

Like what, for instance?

You've been involved in 800+ pages of that thread and have the nerve to ask this question. Get the fuck out of here :lmao

[djohn2oo8]

A name on an account means nothing to me.

So that's your excuse for being wrong? :lmao

[TSA]

So that's your excuse for being wrong? :lmao

Suckered you into betting 2 grand didn't I?

[djohn2oo8]

Suckered you into betting 2 grand didn't I?
No. You are just a sucker. Btw you still didn't answer the question. Are you 100% sure no more indictments coming?

[Pavlov]

You've been involved in 800+ pages of that thread and have the nerve to ask this question. Get the fuck out of here :lmaoJust say if you can't think of anything.

[TSA]

Yet.

Do you think Mueller is going to announce everything mid stream without even interviewing Trump? You make Mueller out to be a chump two bit prosecutor. :lol

He's gonna hit Trump when he's ready. And BTW, collusion is not Trump's only problem. There is this obstruction thingy dangling around his neck too.

Mueller is likely to announce all charges at once or he will clear him. Only two options here.Special Counsel Robert Mueller III and lead attorney in the Special Counsel’s Office Andrew Weissmann have been connected to one another throughout most of their careers, and both men moved quickly to the top tackling major crime syndicates and white-collar crime.

Ironically, both men were also connected in two of the biggest corruption investigations in FBI history. But rarely are Weissmann and Mueller’s past cases discussed in the media. Their past is relevant because it gives a roadmap to the future — now that these two longtime colleagues are charged with one of the most controversial investigations into a president in recent history.

Mueller had similar troubles during the 1980s in Boston when he was Acting U.S. Attorney from 1986 through 1987. Under Mueller’s watch in Boston, another one of the FBI’s most scandalous cases occurred. At the time, an FBI agent by the name of John Connolly, who is now in prison for murder-related charges, had been the handler for James ‘Whitey’ Bulger. Bulger, who Connolly aided in escaping FBI custody in the 90s, was a notorious mobster and murderer who had been working as a confidential informant for the FBI against other crime syndicates in the Boston area. Mueller, who oversaw the FBI during his time there, was criticized by the media and congressional members for how the situation in Boston was handled. Bulger, who committed numerous murders during his time as an informant, disappeared for more than 16 years until he was finally captured in California in 2011; by that time Mueller was director of the FBI.

Special Counsel Robert Mueller III and Whitey Bulger

James ‘Whitey’ Bulger: a notorious gangster and murderer from Boston, who was also a long time confidential informant of the FBI.
During the 1980s, Mueller served as an assistant US attorney and then as the acting US attorney in Boston. The FBI was under his supervision during the time Bulger was an informant.
Former FBI Special Agent John Connolly, who is now in prison for racketeering and murder-related charges, had been the handler for James ‘Whitey’ Bulger. He allegedly tipped off Bulger that one of his business associates was going to testify against him. Bulger had his associate murdered.
Bulger was a confidential informant for the FBI since 1975 and escaped arrest by the FBI in the 90s after his FBI handler informed Bulger an arrest was imminent. He was on the run for 16 years and captured in 2011. Mueller was then director of the FBI.
In 1965 four men were convicted of a murder that the FBI later learned they did not commit. Three of the men faced death sentences.
The FBI had learned during the time Bulger was an informant that the men did not commit the murders. The men served decades in prison and two of them died in prison.
A jury trial revealed that the FBI had known the men were innocent but withheld the evidence from state law enforcement authorities.
In 2007, a jury awarded more than $101 million in damages to the surviving men and their families.
However, during the time the men were in prison Mueller wrote multiple letters to the parole and pardons board opposing clemency for the four men. Mueller never answered questions as to what he knew about the case or if he was aware of the men’s innocence, as reported extensively by Kevin Cullen, a Pulitzer Prize-winning writer with the Boston Globe.
In 2013, Bulger went on trial for 32 counts of racketeering, money laundering and extortion. He was also indicted on weapons charges and 19 counts of murder.
https://saraacarter.com/robert-mueller-andrew-weissmann-the-fbi-and-the-mob/

[TSA]

Just say if you can't think of anything.

No I'll just leave it at you pretending you can't think of anything and continue to laugh at your dishonesty.

[djohn2oo8]

No. You are just a sucker. Btw you still didn't answer the question. Are you 100% sure no more indictments coming?
TSA

[Pavlov]

Special Counsel Robert Mueller III and lead attorney in the Special Counsel’s Office Andrew Weissmann have been connected to one another throughout most of their careers, and both men moved quickly to the top tackling major crime syndicates and white-collar crime.

Ironically, both men were also connected in two of the biggest corruption investigations in FBI history. But rarely are Weissmann and Mueller’s past cases discussed in the media. Their past is relevant because it gives a roadmap to the future — now that these two longtime colleagues are charged with one of the most controversial investigations into a president in recent history.

Mueller had similar troubles during the 1980s in Boston when he was Acting U.S. Attorney from 1986 through 1987. Under Mueller’s watch in Boston, another one of the FBI’s most scandalous cases occurred. At the time, an FBI agent by the name of John Connolly, who is now in prison for murder-related charges, had been the handler for James ‘Whitey’ Bulger. Bulger, who Connolly aided in escaping FBI custody in the 90s, was a notorious mobster and murderer who had been working as a confidential informant for the FBI against other crime syndicates in the Boston area. Mueller, who oversaw the FBI during his time there, was criticized by the media and congressional members for how the situation in Boston was handled. Bulger, who committed numerous murders during his time as an informant, disappeared for more than 16 years until he was finally captured in California in 2011; by that time Mueller was director of the FBI.

Special Counsel Robert Mueller III and Whitey Bulger

James ‘Whitey’ Bulger: a notorious gangster and murderer from Boston, who was also a long time confidential informant of the FBI.
During the 1980s, Mueller served as an assistant US attorney and then as the acting US attorney in Boston. The FBI was under his supervision during the time Bulger was an informant.
Former FBI Special Agent John Connolly, who is now in prison for racketeering and murder-related charges, had been the handler for James ‘Whitey’ Bulger. He allegedly tipped off Bulger that one of his business associates was going to testify against him. Bulger had his associate murdered.
Bulger was a confidential informant for the FBI since 1975 and escaped arrest by the FBI in the 90s after his FBI handler informed Bulger an arrest was imminent. He was on the run for 16 years and captured in 2011. Mueller was then director of the FBI.
In 1965 four men were convicted of a murder that the FBI later learned they did not commit. Three of the men faced death sentences.
The FBI had learned during the time Bulger was an informant that the men did not commit the murders. The men served decades in prison and two of them died in prison.
A jury trial revealed that the FBI had known the men were innocent but withheld the evidence from state law enforcement authorities.
In 2007, a jury awarded more than $101 million in damages to the surviving men and their families.
However, during the time the men were in prison Mueller wrote multiple letters to the parole and pardons board opposing clemency for the four men. Mueller never answered questions as to what he knew about the case or if he was aware of the men’s innocence, as reported extensively by Kevin Cullen, a Pulitzer Prize-winning writer with the Boston Globe.
In 2013, Bulger went on trial for 32 counts of racketeering, money laundering and extortion. He was also indicted on weapons charges and 19 counts of murder.
https://saraacarter.com/robert-mueller-andrew-weissmann-the-fbi-and-the-mob/Mueller bad now.

Does that change your conspiracy theory that Mueller is working with Trump?

Yes or no.

[Pavlov]

No I'll just leave it at you pretending you can't think of anything and continue to laugh at your dishonesty.You made the accusation.

Now you're running away.

Just like all your conspiracy theories.

lol TSAdan

[TSA]

You made the accusation.

Now you're running away.

Just like all your conspiracy theories.

lol TSAdan

I'm not running from anything, I'm sitting back laughing at your dishonesty.

[Pavlov]

I'm not running from anything, I'm sitting back laughing at your dishonesty.I asked you for an example.

You ran away.

I'm laughing at you.

[djohn2oo8]

I'm not running from anything, I'm sitting back laughing at your dishonesty.

Mueller bad now?

[TSA]

I asked you for an example.

You ran away.

I'm laughing at you.

I'm still here, laughing at your dishonesty.

[Pavlov]

I'm still here, laughing at your dishonesty.Name an example, TSAdan.

[TSA]

Name an example, TSAdan.

Post #1 of the thread you are currently being dishonest in.

[Pavlov]

Post #1 of the thread you are currently being dishonest in.This one?

Use your words, TSAdan.

[TSA]

This one?

Use your words, TSAdan.

:lol yes

[Pavlov]

:lol yesThe first post has him gloating because it was determined another Special Counsel wasn't necessary.

What is there to debunk?

[Reck]

Mueller bad now.

Does that change your conspiracy theory that Mueller is working with Trump?

Yes or no.

TSA contradicts himself so much he doesn't even bother to remember what he said a page ago. :lol

[TSA]

The first post has him gloating because it was determined another Special Counsel wasn't necessary.

What is there to debunk?

No wonder you never call him out on his bullshit, you believe it yourself :rollin

Sessions never determined another Special Counsel wasn't necessary, Sessions left that up to John W. Huber. Smart move as he's now shielded himself from calls of bias if the Obama appointed Federal Prosecutor recommends a second Special Counsel.

[TSA]

TSA contradicts himself so much he doesn't even bother to remember what he said a page ago. :lol

I've never definitively said I think Mueller is good or bad but he was involved in one of the biggest FBI scandals ever. So after what you just learned about Mueller do you think he is good or bad?

[Reck]

I've never definitively said I think Mueller is good or bad but he was involved in one of the biggest FBI scandals ever. So after what you just learned about Mueller do you think he is good or bad?

So why were republicans, pretty much in unison praising him when he was appointed to special counsel? Suddenly he's the most hated man in America?

That's laughable. It's not like his past was hidden. Face it, the guy is being attacked because he's closing in on the golden boy.

I like Mueller just fine.

[TSA]

And this wasn't even that bad of one from djohn he just simply didn't understand what he posted. Take some time to go through his 800 page thread and count up how many of his bullshit claims you've never once called out, or continue to be dishonest.

[djohn2oo8]

I've never definitively said I think Mueller is good or bad but he was involved in one of the biggest FBI scandals ever. So after what you just learned about Mueller do you think he is good or bad?

Yet you said Mueller and Flynn were in cahoots together.

[TSA]

So why were republicans, pretty much in unison praising him when he was appointed to special counsel? Suddenly he's the most hated man in America?

That's laughable. It's not like his past was hidden. Face it, the guy is being attacked because he's closing in on the golden boy.

I like Mueller just fine.

He's being attacked (not by me) because he hasn't produced a shred of evidence concerning Trump/Russia election collusion.

[djohn2oo8]

He's being attacked (not by me) because he hasn't produced a shred of evidence concerning Trump/Russia election collusion.

Now why would someone be attacked during an ongoing investigation?

[Spurminator]

He's being attacked (not by me)

:rolleyes

[djohn2oo8]

TSA is leaking badly because Sessions told that ass no second special counsel.

[TSA]

TSA is leaking badly because Sessions told that ass no second special counsel.

Except Sessions never said that. And it’s apparent you still haven’t read the actual letter you linked to :rollin

[djohn2oo8]

Except Sessions never said that. And it’s apparent you still haven’t read the actual letter you linked to :rollin

So where is the 2nd special counsel, dickhead? :lol

[Reck]

So where is the 2nd special counsel, dickhead? :lol

It's a secret.

[TSA]

So where is the 2nd special counsel, dickhead? :lol

Read the letter and then show me where Sessions says no 2nd Special Counsel. Or save yourself the time and don’t read it and just accept the fact that he never said no 2nd Special Counsel.

[TSA]

979741763266121729

Stealth Jeff

[djohn2oo8]

Read the letter and then show me where Sessions says no 2nd Special Counsel. Or save yourself the time and don’t read it and just accept the fact that he never said no 2nd Special Counsel.

You can't even show me where the 2nd special counsel is can you? lol

[TSA]

You can't even show me where the 2nd special counsel is can you? lol

I never claimed there was a 2nd Special Counsel.

You claimed Sessions said a 2nd Special Counsel wasn’t needed and then linked to the actual letter where he said nothing of the sort. You still haven’t read the letter you linked to :rollin

[djohn2oo8]

I never claimed there was a 2nd Special Counsel.


Goalpost moving. But yeah. There is no 2nd special counsel.

[Pavlov]

No wonder you never call him out on his bullshit, you believe it yourself :rollin

Sessions never determined another Special Counsel wasn't necessary, Sessions left that up to John W. Huber. Smart move as he's now shielded himself from calls of bias if the Obama appointed Federal Prosecutor recommends a second Special Counsel.:rollin

Everyone on your team demands Special Counsel.

They don't get a Special Counsel.

djohn laughs

What part are you not understanding?

[Pavlov]

979741763266121729

Stealth Jeff:lmao Keeping det hope alive.

Why does everyone on your team want a Special Counsel, TSA?

[spurraider21]

after weeks of WE NEED SPECIAL COUNSEL

now its "lol you guys are suckers, we dont even need a special counsel :lol"

[djohn2oo8]

Appointing a special counsel, Sessions said Thursday, is "by design, reserved for use in only the most extraordinary circumstances."

:lol TSA

[Pavlov]

after weeks of WE NEED SPECIAL COUNSEL

now its "lol you guys are suckers, we dont even need a special counsel :lol""But we can still get one anytime we want!"

[TSA]

Goalpost moving. But yeah. There is no 2nd special counsel.

No, what you just said is goalpost moving. You claimed Sessions said no 2nd Special Counsel was needed. Sessions never said that, you shit on yourself by providing the link to Sessions letter.

[djohn2oo8]

No, what you just said is goalpost moving. You claimed Sessions said no 2nd Special Counsel was needed. Sessions never said that, you shit on yourself by providing the link to Sessions letter.

So who did he name to the counsel? :lmao

[Pavlov]

No, what you just said is goalpost moving. You claimed Sessions said no 2nd Special Counsel was needed. Sessions never said that, you shit on yourself by providing the link to Sessions letter.Did he appoint a second Special Counsel?

Yes or no.

[TSA]

:rollin

Everyone on your team demands Special Counsel.

They don't get a Special Counsel.

djohn laughs

What part are you not understanding?

Let’s make this really simple. Did Sessions say no Special Counsel was needed yes or no?

[djohn2oo8]

Appointing a special counsel, Sessions said Thursday, is "by design, reserved for use in only the most extraordinary circumstances."

:lol TSA

No 2nd special counsel.

[dabom]

Appointing a special counsel, Sessions said Thursday, is "by design, reserved for use in only the most extraordinary circumstances."

:lol TSA

:lol

[Pavlov]

Let’s make this really simple. Did Sessions say no Special Counsel was needed yes or no?Sorry. My question is pending.

Did he appoint a second Special Counsel?

Yes or no.

[TSA]

Did he appoint a second Special Counsel?

Yes or no.

Goalpost move. That wasn’t djohns claim.

[Pavlov]

Goalpost move. That wasn’t djohns claim.Certainly doesn't look necessary at this time.

Because he would have, you know, appointed one.

Why does your team want one so badly?

[djohn2oo8]

Certainly doesn't look necessary at this time.

Because he would have, you know, appointed one.

:lmao

[TSA]

:rollin

Everyone on your team demands Special Counsel.

They don't get a Special Counsel.

Had Sessions appointed a Special Counsel at the request of the GOP would the left cry foul yes or no?

[djohn2oo8]

Had Sessions appointed a Special Counsel at the request of the GOP would the left cry foul yes or no?

:lmao that goalpost move holy shit

[Pavlov]

Had Sessions appointed a Special Counsel at the request of the GOP would the left cry foul yes or no?Did they rescind their request?

No, they did not.

He looked into the possibility at their request for over a month.

End result: no Special Counsel.

[TSA]

This is why I call you dishonest Pavlov. You are moving the goalposts for djohn and not even attempting to refute his actual claim.

[djohn2oo8]

No 2nd special counsel.

[Pavlov]

This is why I call you dishonest Pavlov. You are moving the goalposts for djohn and not even attempting to refute his actual claim.Sure looks like one isn't needed at this time since Sessions did not appoint one.

What other conclusion is there to be drawn?

Sooper Sekrit conspiracy!

[TSA]

Did they rescind their request?

No, they did not.

He looked into the possibility at their request for over a month.

End result: no Special Counsel.

Dodge #1

Had Sessions appointed a Special Counsel at the request of the GOP would the left cry foul yes or no?

[djohn2oo8]

Dodge #1

Had Sessions appointed a Special Counsel at the request of the GOP would the left cry foul yes or no?

Bam. No 2nd special counsel.

[Pavlov]

Dodge #1

Had Sessions appointed a Special Counsel at the request of the GOP would the left cry foul yes or no?Sorry, you have questions pending above.

If you're saying Sessions is controlled by the possible reaction of "the left," you need to take a deep breath and think about that.

lol

[TSA]

Sure looks like one isn't needed at this time since Sessions did not appoint one.

What other conclusion is there to be drawn?

Sooper Sekrit conspiracy!

Did Sessions say a 2nd Special Counsel was not needed yes or no?

[TSA]

Sorry, you have questions pending above.

If you're saying Sessions is controlled by the possible reaction of "the left," you need to take a deep breath and think about that.

lolYour question is based on a goalpost move.

[Pavlov]

Did Sessions say a 2nd Special Counsel was not needed yes or no?By not appointing one?

Yes.

He was just stealthy about it.

Like you say he is.

[TSA]

Bam. No 2nd special counsel.

Did Sessions say a 2nd Special Counsel was not needed yes or no?

[Pavlov]

Your question is based on a goalpost move.It makes more sense that he is dangling the remote possibility of still appointing a Special Counsel out of fear of reaction from the right, including Dennison.

There's your answer.

[TSA]

By not appointing one?

Yes.

He was just stealthy about it.

Like you say he is.

In his letter did Sessions say a 2nd Special Counsel was not needed yes or no?

[Pavlov]

In his letter did Sessions say a 2nd Special Counsel was not needed yes or no?Didn't have to.

There is no 2nd Special Counsel. If one was needed, he would appoint one.

[dabom]

Didn't have to.

There is no 2nd Special Counsel. If one was needed, he would appoint one.

:lol

[Pavlov]

It makes more sense that he is dangling the remote possibility of still appointing a Special Counsel out of fear of reaction from the right, including Dennison.

There's your answer.You proved this yourself.


979741763266121729

Stealth Jeff:lmao TSA

[TSA]

Can’t get a straight answer out of either of you. Two shook peas in a pod :lol

[Pavlov]

Can’t get a straight answer out of either of you. Two shook peas in a pod :lolYou can't even say there is no 2nd Special Counsel.

:lol shook

[dabom]

No Special Counsel. Facts. :lol

[djohn2oo8]

You can't even say there is no 2nd Special Counsel.

:lol shook
He appointed Susan Rice.

[TSA]

Didn't have to.

There is no 2nd Special Counsel. If one was needed, he would appoint one.

Sessions has Huber looking into if one is needed, Sessions never said one was or wasn’t needed. By going this route he’s eliminated any future outcry of being biased if he does appoint one.

[Pavlov]

Sessions has Huber looking into if one is needed, Sessions never said one was or wasn’t needed. By going this route he’s eliminated any future outcry of being biased if he does appoint one.If that's your conspiracy theory, fine-- but what if he never appoints one?

Why are you so fixated on a second Special Counsel?

Do you just want one for your side?

Give your reasons.

[TSA]

If that's your conspiracy theory, fine-- but what if he never appoints one?

Why are you so fixated on a second Special Counsel?

Do you just want one for your side?

Give your reasons.

I’m not fixated on a 2nd Special Counsel.

I’m fine with Huber and team working with Horowitz and team.

[Reck]

Sessions has Huber looking into if one is needed, Sessions never said one was or wasn’t needed. By going this route he’s eliminated any future outcry of being biased if he does appoint one.

So are you saying this Huber guy is going to come up with made up charges so Sessions can then appoint a special counsel?

It's already being established that the FBI and DOJ didn't do anything wrong (Hence no second special counsel needed) so what makes you think one will be appointed later?

Unless they come up with made up charges which they would have to make public in details to the American people, I dont see where another special counsel would be appointed.

[TSA]

So are you saying this Huber guy is going to come up with made up charges so Sessions can then appoint a special counsel?

It's already being established that the FBI and DOJ didn't do anything wrong (Hence no second special counsel needed) so what makes you think one will be appointed later?

Unless they come up with made up charges which they would have to make public in details to the American people, I dont see where another special counsel would be appointed.

You’ve just outdone your most recent stupidest shit you’ve ever said post. Well done :bobo

[TSA]

So are you saying this Huber guy is going to come up with made up charges so Sessions can then appoint a special counsel?

It's already being established that the FBI and DOJ didn't do anything wrong (Hence no second special counsel needed) so what makes you think one will be appointed later?

Unless they come up with made up charges which they would have to make public in details to the American people, I dont see where another special counsel would be appointed.

Huber is a Federal Prosecutor, he doesn’t need a Special Counsel to prosecute.

[TSA]

So are you saying this Huber guy is going to come up with made up charges so Sessions can then appoint a special counsel?

It's already being established that the FBI and DOJ didn't do anything wrong (Hence no second special counsel needed) so what makes you think one will be appointed later?

Unless they come up with made up charges which they would have to make public in details to the American people, I dont see where another special counsel would be appointed.

Here’s your chance Pavlov...are you going to call out all that’s wrong with this post or just skip right over it like you always do?

[Reck]

You’ve just outdone your most recent stupidest shit you’ve ever said post. Well done :bobo

Pavlov is right. You're making no sense with your incoherent posting ever since Sessions shut this shit down. :lol

[Pavlov]

I’m not fixated on a 2nd Special Counsel.

I’m fine with Huber and team working with Horowitz and team.Then why are you fighting so hard to prove there will be another Special Counsel?

Give your reasons.

[pgardn]

Muellers team reviewed his testimony to the senate and said Sessions didn’t lie and was not being investigated.

Yes he did.

He told his compadres he did not meet any Russians when in fact he met the Russian ambassador 3 times during the campaign. This has nothing to do with Mueller.

[Pavlov]

Here’s your chance Pavlov...are you going to call out all that’s wrong with this post or just skip right over it like you always do?Yeah.

The IG is still yet to determine if there was any wrongdoing, but they could.

[spurraider21]

Huber is a Federal Prosecutor, he doesn’t need a Special Counsel to prosecute.
If that's the case then why is "Huber looking into if one is needed."

[TSA]

If that's the case then why is "Huber looking into if one is needed."

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4426661/AG-Letter-Re-IG-and-Huber-Reviews.pdf

Because Sessions said so.

[TSA]

Yeah.

The IG is still yet to determine if there was any wrongdoing, but they could.

IG has already determined there was wrongdoing. Why do you think McCabe is begging the public for legal funds?

[djohn2oo8]

IG has already determined there was wrongdoing. Why do you think McCabe is begging the public for legal funds?

Begging? He already got past his goal :lol

[Reck]

IG has already determined there was wrongdoing. Why do you think McCabe is begging the public for legal funds?

Lack of candor does not equal criminal wrongdoing.

Have you ever stop to think McCabe might want to suit the FBI and DOJ over his firing? Not that I think he will but that's just one posibility.

I highly doubt DOJ is gonna want to pursue criminal charges on a guy they already dragged through the mudd because Trump told them to do so.

[spurraider21]

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4426661/AG-Letter-Re-IG-and-Huber-Reviews.pdf

Because Sessions said so.
So even though we already know a special counsel isn't needed, Sessions is still having this guy assess whether or not we need a special counsel? :lol

[TSA]

So even though we already know a special counsel isn't needed, Sessions is still having this guy assess whether or not we need a special counsel? :lol

You don’t know a Special Counsel isn’t needed, Sessions never said that. If one is needed it will be recommended by an Obama appointee. Sessions isn’t stupid.

[TSA]

Lack of candor does not equal criminal wrongdoing.

Have you ever stop to think McCabe might want to suit the FBI and DOJ over his firing? Not that I think he will but that's just one posibility.

I highly doubt DOJ is gonna want to pursue criminal charges on a guy they already dragged through the mudd because Trump told them to do so.

Trump didn’t tell the OIG to investigate, Democrats did. And lying to the IG under oath (lack of candor) is a felony. You’re clueless.

[spurraider21]

You don’t know a Special Counsel isn’t needed, Sessions never said that. If one is needed it will be recommended by an Obama appointee. Sessions isn’t stupid.


Huber is a Federal Prosecutor, he doesn’t need a Special Counsel to prosecute.

[Reck]

Trump didn’t tell the OIG to investigate, Democrats did. And lying to the IG under oath (lack of candor) is a felony. You’re clueless.

First of all. McCabe denies the lack of candor charge.

Second, he didn't get fired for lying under oath. You posted that about a week or so ago and got throughly shit on for your inacurate post.

Or you can you know, back up your claim he lied under oath and that's why he got fired.

The facts are he got accused of lack of candor and that's the reason they went with. The OIG report hasn't even been release to the public for some reason. You would think firing a former FBI acting director would be more complex and transparent than that.

For fun:


Even if McCabe’s dismissal turns out to be fully justified on the merits, President Trump’s public attacks on McCabe, the pressure Trump placed on Sessions to fire him, and the timing and circumstances of McCabe’s dismissal ultimately send the message that FBI officials can be fired for doing their jobs, if that conflicts with the president’s interests. “In the end, such conduct necessarily taints the merits of the action against McCabe,”


2017, Sessions told then-Minnesota Senator Al Franken (https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/03/jeff-sessions-unforced-error/518403/) that “I didn’t have––did not have communications with the Russians.” After it was revealed that Sessions did in fact meet with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak during the campaign,

TSA, you tell me why McCabe was fired for something Sessions did himself?

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/03/candor/556262/

[TSA]

First of all. McCabe denies the lack of candor charge.

Second, he didn't get fired for lying under oath. You posted that about a week or so ago and got throughly shit on for your inacurate post.

Or you can you know, back up your claim he lied under oath and that's why he got fired.

The facts are he got accused of lack of candor and that's the reason they went with. The OIG report hasn't even been release to the public for some reason. You would think firing a former FBI acting director would be more complex and transparent than that.

For fun:





TSA, you tell me why McCabe was fired for something Sessions did himself?

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/03/candor/556262/

What was McCabe fired for genius?

The Sessions shit has been repeatedly debunked by not only the FBI but also by Mueller.

[TSA]

spurraider21

Think real hard about what you think is a witty rebuttal. If you can’t figure it out best of luck with your career in law.

[TSA]

spurraider21

Think real hard about what you think is a witty rebuttal. If you can’t figure it out best of luck with your career in law.

Or just read Sessions letter where he lays out when a Special Prosecutor would be needed.

[pgardn]

Trump gonna test the waters for firing Meuller again. I think he eventually gets it done. The tepid late response response of Paul Ryan, and the late response of McConnell show they were in turn measuring temperatures of fellow Republicans. There was not an immediate condemnation. This is gonna be interesting. Especially after the midterms. If the Republicans make a good showing, Mueller is gone IMO.


CNN sees it coming.

They got a 2hr special on Mueller. They are going to get his no nonsense style out there. CNN is gonna use this program later if they feel Trump goes on a rampage again.

Expecting FOX to find everything Mueller has ever done wrong to counter.