Possible Shooting At YouTube Headquarters

[RandomGuy]

CBS SF) — There is a report of a possible active shooter at YouTube headquarters in San Bruno.

Police have not been able to confirm the report. People near the area report hearing shots fired, police activity and lockdown procedures.

KPIX 5 reporter Andria Borba said at least two Homeland Security units were responding. Police radio transmissions describe casualties being taken to local hospitals.


Vadim Lavrusik, who was working at that facility, wrote on Twitter shortly before 1 p.m. that he heard shots and saw people running while at his desk before barricading himself inside a room with other coworkers

981259304408788993

http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2018/04/03/youtube-shooting-report/

[RandomGuy]

981263546460774400

[Chris]

I'm sure Hogg is on his bike riding to the scene as we speak to conduct interviews.

[djohn2oo8]

I'm sure Hogg is on his bike riding to the scene as we speak to conduct interviews.

Triggered.

[RandomGuy]

I'm sure Hogg is on his bike riding to the scene as we speak to conduct interviews.

Never too early to make fun of a kid who is angry about his friends being murdered in front of him.

[djohn2oo8]

Never too early to make fun of a kid who is angry about his friends being murdered in front of him.

Fake Christian he is.

[boutons_deux]

yawn, nothing but "Living In America"

[Blake]

I wonder if they have a video

[Pavlov]

I'm sure Hogg is on his bike riding to the scene as we speak to conduct interviews.
https://quotecatalog.imgix.net/assets/asset-vopHxDQTiTZ2amqUMPBuqFMu/original.jpg?fit=facearea&w=680&h=415&facepad=4.5
Rent free.

[DarrinS]

That kid needs a sammich, tbh

[djohn2oo8]

That kid needs a sammich, tbh

Triggered.

[DarrinS]

Triggered.

He triggered mass NRA memberships

[djohn2oo8]

He triggered mass NRA memberships

Old man triggered by high school kid.

[Trill Clinton]

Thoughts and prayers

[Pavlov]

He triggered mass NRA membershipsHow many, Darrin?

What is the current number of NRA members?

[spurraider21]

I wonder if they have a video
:lol

[Chris]

Shooter is apparently a woman with a headscarf maybe a hijab. Breaking Unofficial Reports are shooter killed herself just a few minutes ago.

[djohn2oo8]

981272638034235393

???

[djohn2oo8]

Shooter is apparently a woman with a headscarf maybe a hijab. Breaking Unofficial Reports are shooter killed herself just a few minutes ago.

981273606532378624

[monosylab1k]

He triggered mass NRA memberships

How can so many people be so triggered by a 17 year old kid?

[koriwhat]

I'm sure Hogg is on his bike riding to the scene as we speak to conduct interviews.

lmao

[Pavlov]

How can so many people be so triggered by a 17 year old kid?Was it close to the number that were triggered by having a black man as president?

[monosylab1k]

981273606532378624

How white tho? Like “mentally ill” level white or “terrorist” level not as white?

[boutons_deux]

How can so many people be so triggered by a 17 year old kid?

sheeple being led around by a rings in their brains, sheparded by LaPierre and right wing hate media.

they're all fucking ignorant assholes.

[djohn2oo8]

981277673820340224

[koriwhat]

sheeple being led around by a rings in their brains, sheparded by LaPierre and right wing hate media.

they're all fucking ignorant assholes.

you regurgitate article after article and ooze with far left ideology... if anyone is a sheep it's you homie.

[djohn2oo8]

981278560148246530

[RandomGuy]

How can so many people be so triggered by a 17 year old kid?

They are frustrated and freaked out by how effective he is at communicating his message.

Conservatives hate that apparently. For all the mouthing frustrations about being censored for "hate speech", they turn around and attempt to censor opposing viewpoints with gusto.

[spurraider21]

Laguna Beach Antifa has been suspiciously quiet

[monosylab1k]

Soros crisis actors en route

[apalisoc_9]

She killed her boyfriend before going to youtube.

[TSA]

981273606532378624

:lol

[TSA]

How white tho? Like “mentally ill” level white or “terrorist” level not as white?

:lol

[SupremeGuy]

How white tho? Like “mentally ill” level white or “terrorist” level not as white?It's not racist when we do it :cry

[SupremeGuy]

They are frustrated and freaked out by how effective he is at communicating his message.

Conservatives hate that apparently. For all the mouthing frustrations about being censored for "hate speech", they turn around and attempt to censor opposing viewpoints with gusto.lolwut? When was he forced to withdraw from a rally or speech? Because that's the difference. And a huge one, at that.

[monosylab1k]

It's not racist when we do it :cry

Who are you? Stop replying to me, thx

[monosylab1k]

How white tho? Like “mentally ill” level white or “terrorist” level not as white?

Trump’s DEFINITELY calling this bitch a terrorist.

[boutons_deux]

I'd say she was as emotionally fucked up, unbalanced as Trash.

http://www.latimes.com/resizer/IKE6GzJFM4iDqd0AiaRkROy4Jeo=/1400x0/arc-anglerfish-arc2-prod-tronc.s3.amazonaws.com/public/S5F2OZ2O2ZG7ZM6CWXAKKEUXHI.jpg

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-you-tube-shooting-20180404-story.html#nws=mcnewsletter

[Expert]

^Holy shit Boots is going to go postal on ST headquarters next since almost no one reads your shit.

[Expert]

Shooter is apparently a woman with a headscarf maybe a hijab. Breaking Unofficial Reports are shooter killed herself just a few minutes ago.
Funny report tbh

"There is one deceased individual, self inflicted gunshot wound, who we believe could be the shooter but we're still investigating"

So a self-inflicted gunshot wound could be the shooter? LEO logic is astounding.

But she got what she wanted - her silly ass demented mini-manifesto published by a large media outlet. Hey, you have a beef with anything? Planning on suicide anyhow? Might as well get your message across! Let us help! Signed -Big Media

[spurraider21]

and if they dont publish the info, we'll have conspiritards calling it a false flag or a government coverup

[Mikeanaro]

Demtards were expecting a fat guy with a mullet and a confederate flag shirt.

[SupremeGuy]

Who are you? Stop replying to me, thxFuck you, bigot.

[Pavlov]

When I heard about it the first thought I had was to make a TOS grievance joke. Sure didn't expect a woman though.

[koriwhat]

Demtards were expecting a fat guy with a mullet and a confederate flag shirt.

instead they got a hijab wearing, female, iranian, pos far-lefty terrorist.

[Mikeanaro]

instead they got a hijab wearing, female, iranian, pos far-lefty terrorist.
And to be honest, I expect more violence from those freaking muslims than any other people on earth.
They should live in their shithole countries, drinking piss and eating beards.

[DarrinS]

Seems like she was just a nutjob. Sorry, no political points for either tribe.

[Spurminator]

Seems like she was just a nutjob. Sorry, no political points for either tribe.

She used a gun right? It doesn't sound like you understand the scoring system.

[koriwhat]

Trump’s DEFINITELY calling this bitch a terrorist.

lol life isn't fair...


I'd say she was as emotionally fucked up, unbalanced as Trash.

http://www.latimes.com/resizer/IKE6GzJFM4iDqd0AiaRkROy4Jeo=/1400x0/arc-anglerfish-arc2-prod-tronc.s3.amazonaws.com/public/S5F2OZ2O2ZG7ZM6CWXAKKEUXHI.jpg

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-you-tube-shooting-20180404-story.html#nws=mcnewsletter

i'd include you in her fucked up mentally ill and unbalanced demographic any day over trump. so sour bouts and all the time too. lmao

[Chris]

Funny report tbh

"There is one deceased individual, self inflicted gunshot wound, who we believe could be the shooter but we're still investigating"

So a self-inflicted gunshot wound could be the shooter? LEO logic is astounding.

But she got what she wanted - her silly ass demented mini-manifesto published by a large media outlet. Hey, you have a beef with anything? Planning on suicide anyhow? Might as well get your message across! Let us help! Signed -Big Media

No AR-15 this time so it's kosher.

[monosylab1k]

And to be honest, I expect more violence from those freaking muslims than any other people on earth.
They should live in their shithole countries, drinking piss and eating beards.

:lmao says the Argentina goat herder.

[Chris]

:lmao says the Argentina goat herder.

Semen shielding for Islam because DRUMPF! :lmao

[DarrinS]

She used a gun right? It doesn't sound like you understand the scoring system.

This seems to be a winning issue for you guys.

[SupremeGuy]

:lmao says the Argentina goat herder.But we're not bigots, you are :cry

[Spurminator]

This seems to be a winning issue for you guys.

I care less about winning than being right. Scoreboarding on brown murderers may be a "winning issue" for you guys because people are generally dumb, but that doesn't make you right.

[Spurminator]

981273606532378624

Wong Way? lol

[Pavlov]

This seems to be a winning issue for you guys.Seems to trigger you along with skinny teen boys.

[Gummi Clutch]

And to be honest, I expect more violence from those freaking muslims than any other people on earth.
They should live in their shithole countries, drinking piss and eating beards.
Aren't you guys one of the biggest reasons for drug problems in the world..? Pretty sure every piss poor farmer in argentina is helping make drugs to fuck people up/kill them here and other places. Keep your shitty cartels to yourself and be thankful you have running water :lol

[Mikeanaro]

:lmao says the Argentina goat herder.
As Chris said, when you reach a new low defending the religion of peace.

Wear a hijab and squeeze your weenie, freak.

[Gummi Clutch]

As Chris said, when you reach a new low defending the religion of peace.

Wear a hijab and squeeze your weenie, freak.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JXFST1-Kvh4&feature=youtu.be

[Mikeanaro]

Aren't you guys one of the biggest reasons for drug problems in the world..? Pretty sure every piss poor farmer in argentina is helping make drugs to fuck people up/kill them here and other places. Keep your shitty cartels to yourself and be thankful you have running water :lol
Cartels are from Mexico and Colombia you retard, you must be over 30 and cant even identify what countries are/make in your own continent.

Here, illustrate your pumpkin

https://legacy.lib.utexas.edu/maps/americas/latin_america_1990.jpg

[Gummi Clutch]

Cartels are from Mexico and Colombia you retard, you must be over 30 and cant even identify what countries are/make in your own continent.

Here, illustrate your pumpkin

:cry :cry :cry

Cartels are drug organizations. Nice try, but you failed. Argentina is riddled with them. The reason you don't hear about it as often as Mexico is because you have just as corrupt of a government but aren't close enough to the U.S to be exposed.

[Chris]

Dummi Clutch :lol

[Mikeanaro]

Cartels are drug organizations. Nice try, but you failed. Argentina is riddled with them. The reason you don't hear about it as often as Mexico is because you have just as corrupt of a government but aren't close enough to the U.S to be exposed.
Yeah, blah blah, you know more than me right?
USA is full of Cartels then...

Aren't you guys one of the biggest reasons for drug problems in the world..? Pretty sure every piss poor farmer in USA is helping make drugs to fuck people up/kill them here and other places. Keep your shitty cartels to yourself and be thankful you have running water/CNN :lol

[Gummi Clutch]

Dummi Clutch :lol


Yeah, blah blah, you know more than me right?
USA is full of Cartels then...

Aren't you guys one of the biggest reasons for drug problems in the world..? Pretty sure every piss poor farmer in USA is helping make drugs to fuck people up/kill them here and other places. Keep your shitty cartels to yourself and be thankful you have running water/CNN :lol
Don't worry...we have inbred goat fuckers here too, see above in Chris :lmao

[Expert]

No AR-15 this time so it's kosher.
Are the survivors at Youtube going to march on Washington or just post a video about it?

[Expert]

She used a gun right? It doesn't sound like you understand the scoring system.
"Who here has stated they want to ban all guns?"

[SupremeGuy]

Dummi Clutch :lolI couldn't even tell if he was purposely trolling or just a fucking idiot. Looks like both. :lol

[Spurminator]

"Who here has stated they want to ban all guns?"

What part of that comment implied a gun ban?

[spurraider21]

Oh look. Dmc doing that thing where he presents the only two choices as doing nothing and a full gun ban, so he gets to say banning guns is bad.

[DarrinS]

Lol

https://squawker.org/culture-wars/mashable-caught-lightening-the-skin-photoshopping-green-eyes-on-youtube-shooter-nasim-aghdam/

[Expert]

Oh look. Dmc doing that thing where he presents the only two choices as doing nothing and a full gun ban, so he gets to say banning guns is bad.

You're trying to play both sides (as usual).

She didn't use an AR-15 however the left wants to use the fact that she used any gun at all as a talking point against guns in general, but then falls back on "we didn't say ban all guns" when cornered on 2A.

There was no bifurcating. You just ran out of philo shit to talk about.

How many shots did she fire? Limit the magazine size to that many rounds, for her.

In fact, all liberals should voluntarily give up their 2A rights to own a gun. That reduces the number of people who can own a gun significantly.

[spurraider21]

You're trying to play both sides (as usual).

She didn't use an AR-15 however the left wants to use the fact that she used any gun at all as a talking point against guns in general, but then falls back on "we didn't say ban all guns" when cornered on 2A.

There was no bifurcating. You just ran out of philo shit to talk about.

How many shots did she fire? Limit the magazine size to that many rounds, for her.

In fact, all liberals should voluntarily give up their 2A rights to own a gun. That reduces the number of people who can own a gun significantly.
where did i say the proper response to this shooting is to ban all guns?

[Expert]

where did i say the proper response to this shooting is to ban all guns?


"Who here has stated they want to ban all guns?"
:lol

[spurraider21]

:lol
so you took spurminator's comment that she used to a gun to mean that spurminator believes the appropriate response this shooting is to ban all guns? wow

especially after spurminator himself raised this exact point? wow

[Expert]

I'd say she was as emotionally fucked up, unbalanced as Trash.

http://www.latimes.com/resizer/IKE6GzJFM4iDqd0AiaRkROy4Jeo=/1400x0/arc-anglerfish-arc2-prod-tronc.s3.amazonaws.com/public/S5F2OZ2O2ZG7ZM6CWXAKKEUXHI.jpg

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-you-tube-shooting-20180404-story.html#nws=mcnewsletter

Btw, pretty sure this is just creative angle photography. Her shirt actually says "Hello Kitty" if you went all the way around.

[Expert]

so you took spurminator's comment that she used to a gun to mean that spurminator believes the appropriate response this shooting is to ban all guns? wow

Oh the horror of even suggesting that! :lol

[spurraider21]

Oh the horror of even suggesting that! :lol
not the horror. just the idiocy

[Expert]

not the horror. just the idiocy

Tell me what these points mean in the gun conversation if not ultimately a ban on guns?

[spurraider21]

Tell me what these points mean in the gun conversation if not ultimately a ban on guns?


Your need to divide people into two extreme positions is another indication that you're short on scope.

[Spurminator]

Tell me what these points mean in the gun conversation if not ultimately a ban on guns?

To borrow a metaphor you guys love to use...

"Drunks shouldn't be allowed to drive"

:madrun "YOU WANT TO BAN CARS!" :madrun

[Expert]

Philo again didn't answer the question. You're trying to play the logical fallacy card on every turn but you've yet to actually comment on what the alternative would be. That's likely because you simply don't know.

A gun control argument needs to define the level of control. How would gun control have prevented that shooting?

[Expert]

To borrow a metaphor you guys love to use...

"Drunks shouldn't be allowed to drive"

:madrun "YOU WANT TO BAN CARS!" :madrun

Poor analogy. You said the fact that a gun was used means a point is scored for the anti-gun crowd. I want to know exactly how that works since supposedly you're not after all guns.

[Spurminator]

Frankly my post wasn't even a commentary on gun control or its implications to this specific case. I was simply pointing out to DarrinS that he was misrepresenting the two "sides" of the debate.

[Expert]

Seems like she was just a nutjob. Sorry, no political points for either tribe.


She used a gun right? It doesn't sound like you understand the scoring system.

These two don't jive with this next one...


Frankly my post wasn't even a commentary on gun control or its implications to this specific case. I was simply pointing out to DarrinS that he was misrepresenting the two "sides" of the debate.

On one hand you say "scoring system" and on the next you say "sides".

Which is it?

Since you said "scoring system" then you're inferring that any gun related fatality or mass attack = points for gun control crowd.

[Spurminator]

Poor analogy. You said the fact that a gun was used means a point is scored for the anti-gun crowd. I want to know exactly how that works since supposedly you're not after all guns.

No, I didn't say that. I'm not keeping score. That's for you guys.

But if I did believe this was about guns (which I don't), I would make an argument related to access. A discussion could be had about how this person was able to get a gun and whether there should be controls in place to prevent that. So the analogy makes perfect sense, if you're not myopic.

[Spurminator]

These two don't jive with this next one...

Sure it does.

[Expert]

Sure it does.

That's your answer, to just wave it off?

Why even respond?

[Expert]

No, I didn't say that. I'm not keeping score. That's for you guys.

You're a remote observer who inserts yourself into the discussion without any ties to either side? Hard to believe that since you're a Hillary voter. Funny how many people here claim to be neutral.


But if I did believe this was about guns (which I don't), I would make an argument related to access. A discussion could be had about how this person was able to get a gun and whether there should be controls in place to prevent that. So the analogy makes perfect sense, if you're not myopic.
How do you prevent access to a gun by someone with a constitutional right to keep and bear arms if not a ban on guns? Had she done anything that mean't she wasn't legally allowed to have a gun?

[Spurminator]

On one hand you say "scoring system" and on the next you say "sides".

Which is it?

Since you said "scoring system" then you're inferring that any gun related fatality or mass attack = points for gun control crowd.

Since you seem very interested in defending Darrin's honor, let me paraphrase so you'll more easily understand the exchange.

DarrinS: She's just a nutjob, rather than a radical Islamist or a radical conservative (Spurminator's interpretation), ergo neither tribe can gloat.

Me: Acknowledging that one tribe does typically gloat when attacks happen at the hands of radical Islamists, the primary concern of the other tribe is not usually about political worldview, but about access to guns. Therefore, if someone from that tribe, as you've defined them, decided to gloat, they may still be inclined to do so. Nowhere herein do I suggest that they should do so or that points matter in this game.

Do you follow?

[Spurminator]

You're a remote observer who inserts yourself into the discussion without any ties to either side? Hard to believe that since you're a Hillary voter. Funny how many people here claim to be neutral.

:lol How does my vote in a Presidential election have anything to do with my urgency to gloat about a particular shooting's implications in a partisan debate? Are you this desperate to talk about Hillary again? You're making no sense.


How do you prevent access to a gun by someone with a constitutional right to keep and bear arms if not a ban on guns? Had she done anything that mean't she wasn't legally allowed to have a gun?

We already prevent certain people from owning guns, and we do not currently have a ban on guns. This is not a difficult concept.

[Expert]

:lol How does my vote in a Presidential election have anything to do with my urgency to gloat about a particular shooting's implications in a partisan debate? Are you this desperate to talk about Hillary again? You're making no sense.


Re-read the two quotes. DarrisS mentioned political points for "sides" and you barked back that he didn't understand the scoring system. What are these "sides" if not gun control vs 2A? I'm still waiting for you to come back to the middle. You made the comment then you've been back peddling since.


We already prevent certain people from owning guns, and we do not currently have a ban on guns. This is not a difficult concept.
So she should be declared mentally incompetent post-mortem?

[Spurminator]

Re-read the two quotes. DarrisS mentioned political points for "sides" and you barked back that he didn't understand the scoring system. What are these "sides" if not gun control vs 2A? I'm still waiting for you to come back to the middle. You made the comment then you've been back peddling since.

Ask DarrinS. I interpreted his sides as "This was caused by Islam/blacks/immigrants/etc" vs. "This was caused by angry white conservatives" and disagreed that those are the two sides in instances like these.

It wouldn't really make sense for him to define the tribes as Gun Control vs. 2A and then claim neither side could call scoreboard on a shooting.


So she should be declared mentally incompetent post-mortem?

I haven't claimed to know the solution in this particular case or if there even was a solution. I'm just saying that preventing dangerous people from gaining access to guns doesn't require a ban on guns, which is what you keep going back to.

[Expert]

Ask DarrinS. I interpreted his sides as "This was caused by Islam/blacks/immigrants/etc" vs. "This was caused by angry white conservatives" and disagreed that those are the two sides in instances like these.

It wouldn't really make sense for him to define the tribes as Gun Control vs. 2A and then claim neither side could call scoreboard on a shooting.

Since you say he doesn't understand the scoring system, I'm still waiting for you to explain it.

However:

Gun control side: "If she didn't have a gun she couldn't have shot anyone including herself"

2A side: "She had a constitutional right to own a gun. You cannot prevent everything and this isn't the 'Minority Report'"


I haven't claimed to know the solution in this particular case or if there even was a solution. I'm just saying that preventing dangerous people from gaining access to guns doesn't require a ban on guns, which is what you keep going back to.
1. How do you determine "dangerous" on a per capita basis?
2. The cops talked to her for 20 minutes just hours before the shooting, they didn't determine she was dangerous.
3. Taking away a 2A right because of what you say in a video is akin to taking away a 1A right since you suffered repercussions because you exercised your 1A right.

[Spurminator]

Since you say he doesn't understand the scoring system, I'm still waiting for you to explain it.

When shootings happen, scoring is typically either "See? Muslim/Black" or "See? Guns." That's it. I do not condone this scoring system, I merely acknowledge its existence. I did not expect anyone to be this offended by that reality.



1. How do you determine "dangerous" on a per capita basis?
2. The cops talked to her for 20 minutes just hours before the shooting, they didn't determine she was dangerous.
3. Taking away a 2A right because of what you say in a video is akin to taking away a 1A right since you suffered repercussions because you exercised your 1A right.

I don't dispute any of this, I have only disputed that the complexities of the gun control debate don't require that gun control advocates call for a gun ban.

[Chris]

When shootings happen, scoring is typically either "See? Muslim/Black" or "See? Guns." That's it. I do not condone this scoring system, I merely acknowledge its existence. I did not expect anyone to be this offended by that reality.

That might be one of the dumbest things I've read in a long time.




I don't dispute any of this, I have only disputed that the complexities of the gun control debate don't require that gun control advocates call for a gun ban.


I've read this several times and it makes zero sense. Redundant drivel.

[Expert]

When shootings happen, scoring is typically either "See? Muslim/Black" or "See? Guns." That's it. I do not condone this scoring system, I merely acknowledge its existence. I did not expect anyone to be this offended by that reality.

This is just the "U mad" defense.

What is the "see, guns" side doing when they say that if not hinting at the alternative? The alternative is "see, no guns". This seems obvious to me.


I don't dispute any of this, I have only disputed that the complexities of the gun control debate don't require that gun control advocates call for a gun ban.
Not just like that. The slippery slope isn't a cliff. I'd like to see an explanation of how it's even possible to control anything without preventing someone from getting it.

[Spurminator]

This is just the "U mad" defense.

What is the "see, guns" side doing when they say that if not hinting at the alternative? The alternative is "see, no guns". This seems obvious to me.

You asked me to define the tribes, not to advocate for them. Now you're pulling arguments out of the air so you have something to talk about.


Not just like that. The slippery slope isn't a cliff. I'd like to see an explanation of how it's even possible to control anything without preventing someone from getting it.

Then review current gun restrictions, because we already do it.

[Spurminator]

That might be one of the dumbest things I've read in a long time.



lol MSM freaking out about Alex Jones and Mark Dice after casually dismissing them as tin foil hat conspiracy theorists. Information war is real. Now they can just call him a snake oil salesman since he's competing with BigPharma with his health products. They can't figure out why he's successful and why a certain percentage of the population isn't buying their bullshit. NBC news has become reality tv for liberals and retards. Nice hit piece here; outstanding journalism.

[Expert]

You asked me to define the tribes, not to advocate for them. Now you're pulling arguments out of the air so you have something to talk about.


So when I said "who said anyone wants to ban guns?" why did you and Philo freak out? It sounds like you have zero interest in either debate... now.


What part of that comment implied a gun ban?


Oh look. Dmc doing that thing where he presents the only two choices as doing nothing and a full gun ban, so he gets to say banning guns is bad.

Seems now that it's quite possible one of those two sides does want to ban guns, and you obviously don't have a dog in the race.


Then review current gun restrictions, because we already do it.
What is a restriction and why are you relying on euphemisms instead of saying "prevent people from having guns"? You want more people to not have guns. When that doesn't stop gun violence, you'll want even more people on the "no gun" list. Slippery slope that euphemisms don't disguise so well.

[Expert]

By the way, the right is fully aware of this slippery slope that the left has been dying to get started down, which is why even seemingly benign gun laws don't make it though.

[spurraider21]

By the way, the right is fully aware of this slippery slope that the left has been dying to get started down, which is why even seemingly benign gun laws don't make it though.
no. that just means the right is fully willing to commit the slippery slope fallacy at all times.

:lol justifying the right's paranoia with baseless claims about what the left is "dying" to do (according to you)

[Expert]

no. that just means the right is fully willing to commit the slippery slope fallacy at all times.

:lol justifying the right's paranoia with baseless claims about what the left is "dying" to do (according to you)
:lol dismissing it when you cannot even ban bump stocks
:lol Wet behind the ears, the only gun you've ever experienced was in a FPS

[Expert]

Preventing Gun Violence

With 33,000 Americans dying every year, Democrats believe that we must finally take sensible action to address gun violence. While responsible gun ownership is part of the fabric of many communities, too many families in America have suffered from gun violence. We can respect the rights of responsible gun owners while keeping our communities safe. To build on the success of the lifesaving Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, we will expand and strengthen background checks and close dangerous loopholes in our current laws; repeal the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) to revoke the dangerous legal immunity protections gun makers and sellers now enjoy; and keep weapons of war—such as assault weapons and large capacity ammunition magazines (LCAM's)—off our streets. We will fight back against attempts to make it harder for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives to revoke federal licenses from law breaking gun dealers, and ensure guns do not fall into the hands of terrorists, intimate partner abusers, other violent criminals, and those with severe mental health issues. There is insufficient research on effective gun prevention policies, which is why the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention must have the resources it needs to study gun violence as a public health issue.

:cry but it doesn't say "ban".

[Expert]

Preventing Gun Violence

With 33,000 Americans dying every year, Democrats believe that we must finally take sensible action to address gun violence. While responsible gun ownership is part of the fabric of many communities, too many families in America have suffered from gun violence. We can respect the rights of responsible gun owners while keeping our communities safe. To build on the success of the lifesaving Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, we will expand and strengthen background checks and close dangerous loopholes in our current laws; repeal the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) to revoke the dangerous legal immunity protections gun makers and sellers now enjoy; and keep weapons of war—such as assault weapons and large capacity ammunition magazines (LCAM's)—off our streets. We will fight back against attempts to make it harder for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives to revoke federal licenses from law breaking gun dealers, and ensure guns do not fall into the hands of terrorists, intimate partner abusers, other violent criminals, and those with severe mental health issues. There is insufficient research on effective gun prevention policies, which is why the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention must have the resources it needs to study gun violence as a public health issue.

:cry but it doesn't say "ban".
"Off our streets" means "banned". No one is putting guns on the actual street. It's another left euphemism to avoid saying "from the American citizen".

So what do the feds classify as an assault weapon?

Drawing from federal and state law definitions, the term assault weapon refers primarily to semi-automatic rifles (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semi-automatic_rifle), pistols (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semi-automatic_pistol), and shotguns (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semi-automatic_shotgun) that are able to accept detachable magazines and possess one or more other features.[2] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assault_weapon#cite_note-Babay121222-2)[9] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assault_weapon#cite_note-BAW2004-9)[10] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assault_weapon#cite_note-Koerner040916-10) Some jurisdictions define revolving cylinder shotguns as assault weapons.[11] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assault_weapon#cite_note-SB23-2000-11)[12] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assault_weapon#cite_note-ConnJudicial-12) Legislative definitions do not include fully automatic weapons, which are regulated separately as Title II weapons (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_II_weapons) under federal law.[13] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assault_weapon#cite_note-FedBan94-13)[n 1] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assault_weapon#cite_note-15) A key defining law was the now-defunct Federal Assault Weapons Ban (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Assault_Weapons_Ban) of 1994.[13] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assault_weapon#cite_note-FedBan94-13) At that time, the United States Department of Justice (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Department_of_Justice) said, "In general, assault weapons are semiautomatic firearms with a large magazine of ammunition that were designed and configured for rapid fire and combat use."[3] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assault_weapon#cite_note-Levs130131-3)

So the term "assault weapon" is a slippery slope term coined basically by the media who misunderstood the differences between an assault rifle and a semi-automatic rifle that looks like an assault rifle. Now that mischaracterization is being used to create the slippery slope that would encompass all the above listed items.

[spurraider21]

:lol dismissing it when you cannot even ban bump stocks
:lol Wet behind the ears, the only gun you've ever experienced was in a FPS
when in doubt, start creating false narratives

[spurraider21]

now DMC thinks an assault weapon ban is a ban of all guns

[Chris]

when in doubt, start creating false narratives

That's your modus operandi along with conflation. Habitual fence sitter.

[Expert]

now DMC thinks an assault weapon ban is a ban of all guns

You're free to point out the flaw in my presentation. You've wasted two posts and haven't touched it yet.

Since you're a lawyer, surely you recognize that legal definitions mean something where new laws are concerned.

Not all guns. You could still own a musket.

[Expert]

That's your modus operandi along with conflation. Habitual fence sitter.
Provides a high ground for sniping.

[Pavlov]

I didn't read DMC's posts. I'm going to conclude he didn't have an actual take on the OP.

[spurraider21]

That's your modus operandi along with conflation. Habitual fence sitter.
What’s your take on the shape of the earth and the Apollo moon landing of 1969?

i predict you’ll sit on the fence

[Chris]

What’s your take on the shape of the earth and the Apollo moon landing of 1969?

i predict you’ll sit on the fence

Case in point. You're so predictable.

[spurraider21]

Case in point. You're so predictable.
here's me not sitting on a fence:

the earth is spherical (not a perfect sphere, but close to it. definitely not flat. no snow-globe earth with an impenetrable dome)

we landed on the moon in 1969

i'll let you enjoy your seat on the fence

[Expert]

The agnostic debater

[spurraider21]

The deaf music critic.