OIG report releases

[TSA]

Phase 1: McCabe

https://static01.nyt.com/files/2018/us/politics/20180413a-doj-oig-mccabe-report.pdf

[TSA]

Wonder if all those fools who donated to his legal defense fund can ask for a refund.

Did anyone here donate?

[spurraider21]

C. Conclusion

As detailed in this report, the OIG found that then-Deputy Director AndrewMcCabe lacked candor, including under oath, on multiple occasions in connection with describing his role in connection with a disclosure to the WSJ, and that this conduct violated FBI Offense Codes 2.5 and 2.6. The OIG also concluded that McCabe’s disclosure of the existence of an ongoing investigation in the manner described in this report violated the FBI’s and the Department’s media policy and constituted misconduct.

The OIG is issuing this report to the FBI for such action that it deems to beappropriate.

[Pavlov]

Wonder if all those fools who donated to his legal defense fund can ask for a refund.

Did anyone here donate?Did you say the same about Flynn?

[TSA]

Flynn

*ding

[Pavlov]

*dingIt's a fair comparison.

You've gone on and on about McCabe's defense fund and whenever you are asked about Flynn's you completely shut down.

Why?

[Chris]

*ding

Gotheem!

[Chris]

984866238542344197
984871436602036224

[TSA]

It's a fair comparison.

You've gone on and on about McCabe's defense fund and whenever you are asked about Flynn's you completely shut down.

Why?

It's not a fair comparison.

Flynn admitted his mistake, apologized, and accepted his fate. McCabe denied his mistake, blamed others, and has not accepted his fate.

You *dinged yourself good, deal with it.

[Pavlov]

It's not a fair comparison.

Flynn admitted his mistake, apologized, and accepted his fate. McCabe denied his mistake, blamed others, and has not accepted his fate.But still begs for money.

Should he return all that money since he admitted his guilt?

[TSA]

But still begs for money.

Should he return all that money since he admitted his guilt?

The people donated to Flynn after he admitted his guilt dipshit. Like I just said, it isn't a fair comparison to McCabe. This will be my last comment on this matter in this thread, your attempt to derail this and make it about Flynn is now DOA.

[TSA]

984875605463203841

[spurraider21]

The people donated to Flynn after he admitted his guilt dipshit. Like I just said, it isn't a fair comparison to McCabe. This will be my last comment on this matter in this thread, your attempt to derail this and make it about Flynn is now DOA.
thought they're funding his imminent withdrawal of his guilty plea... (which would also contradict your claim that he has accepted his fate)

[Chris]

What about Flynn though amirite guys? Never mind we have an 800 page thread about that. Let's talk about Flynn.

[spurraider21]

What about Flynn though amirite guys? Never mind we have an 800 page thread about that. Let's talk about Flynn.
pretty sure i mentioned to you weeks ago that OIG investigation is likely going to throw mccabe under the bus for lying about his disclosure to the WSJ

it did just that.

[Pavlov]

The people donated to Flynn after he admitted his guilt dipshit. Like I just said, it isn't a fair comparison to McCabe. This will be my last comment on this matter in this thread, your attempt to derail this and make it about Flynn is now DOA.:lol shut you down again.

TSA doesn't want to talk about King Spook anymore.

Poor little guy.

[Pavlov]

pretty sure i mentioned to you weeks ago that OIG investigation is likely going to throw mccabe under the bus for lying about his disclosure to the WSJ

it did just that.Yeah, they might even fire him for it.

[Splits]

So this is what a nothingburger looks like :lmao

"lack of candor" :lol

[Splits]

"violated" media policy :lmao

LOCK HIM UP!!!

https://i.imgur.com/ZxHBgTS.png

[TSA]

So this is what a nothingburger looks like :lmao

"lack of candor" :lol

Lying under oath is a felony, and they have him doing it on tape.

[Splits]

Lying under oath is a felony, and they have him doing it on tape.

He didn't "lie", he "lacked candor"

:lmao

:cry process crime :cry

[spurraider21]

984871436602036224

"overt moves" refers to putting stuff out in the public when it shouldn't be


the FBI did not want to make a lot of overt moves that could be seen as going after [Clinton] or drawing attention to the probe

looks like if anything, mccabe was pushing back on suggestions to close the clinton investigation... which is consistent with the fact that the WSJ is one that painted clinton negatively... he confirmed that a CF investigation was ongoing


According to a person familiar with the probes, on Aug. 12, a senior Justice Department official called Mr. McCabe to voice his displeasure at finding that New York FBI agents were still openly pursuing the Clinton Foundation probe during the election season. Mr. McCabe said agents still had the authority to pursue the issue as long as they didn’t use overt methods requiring Justice Department approvals.

The Justice Department official was “very pissed off,” according to one person close to McCabe, and pressed him to explain why the FBI was still chasing a matter the department considered dormant. . . .

“Are you telling me that I need to shut down a validly predicated investigation?” Mr. McCabe asked, according to people familiar with the conversation.

After a pause, the official replied “Of course not,” these people said.

[spurraider21]

Yeah, they might even fire him for it.
i think that would be an appropriate punishment for violating their media policy tbh

[spurraider21]

He didn't "lie", he "lacked candor"

:lmao

:cry process crime :cry
yeah, candor cases are separate and distinct from perjury, as far as i'm aware

[Spurminator]

So, any new news?

[TSA]

He didn't "lie", he "lacked candor"

:lmao

:cry process crime :cry

:lol you're a fucking idiot

We concluded that McCabe lacked candor during his OIG audio-recorded interview under oath on July 28, 2017, when he falsely stated

[spurraider21]

So, any new news?
not really. sessions already said his decision to fire mccabe was the result of the OIG report that mccabe lacked candor.


"After an extensive and fair investigation and according to Department of Justice procedure, the Department’s Office of the Inspector General provided its report on allegations of misconduct by Andrew McCabe to the FBI’s Office of Professional Responsibility," Sessions said in a statement at about 10 p.m. ET Friday night. "The FBI’s OPR then reviewed the report and underlying documents and issued a disciplinary proposal recommending the dismissal of Mr. McCabe. Both the OIG and FBI OPR reports concluded that Mr. McCabe had made an unauthorized disclosure to the news media and lacked candor — including under oath — on multiple occasions."

now the public can see the same report that says mccabe lacked candor.

[TSA]

i think that would be an appropriate punishment for violating their media policy tbh

McCabe didn't publicly beg for legal defense funds to fight media policy violations.

[Splits]

:lol you're a fucking idiot

We concluded that McCabe lacked candor during his OIG audio-recorded interview under oath on July 28, 2017, when he falsely stated

Yes, it was so nefarious that 3 days later "On Tuesday, August 1, 2017, McCabe placed a telephone call to an OIGAssistant Inspector General (“AIG”) to correct the statement he gave on July 28."

:lmao putting all your eggs in the IG report basket and getting cucked with a nothingburger

:lmao violating media policy

:lmao a year's worth of conspiracy theories disintegrating before your eyes

[RandomGuy]

Phase 1: McCabe

https://static01.nyt.com/files/2018/us/politics/20180413a-doj-oig-mccabe-report.pdf

Soooo, McCabe authorized a minor disclosure to a reporter, and then took some mild steps that basically involved not telling the entire truth when the issue came up.

Why is this important again?

[RandomGuy]

McCabe didn't publicly beg for legal defense funds to fight media policy violations.

That is all that is in this report. :rollin


HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAH AHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHa

[TSA]

Yes, it was so nefarious that 3 days later "On Tuesday, August 1, 2017, McCabe placed a telephone call to an OIGAssistant Inspector General (“AIG”) to correct the statement he gave on July 28."

:lmao putting all your eggs in the IG report basket and getting cucked with a nothingburger

:lmao violating media policy

:lmao a year's worth of conspiracy theories disintegrating before your eyes

Holy fuck you are making an ass of yourself. He lied October 16, 2016 to Comey. He lied on May 9th, 2017 under oath to INSD agents.


You think this is all that's coming from the OIG report?

The initial memo has 5 different aspects of the investigation and the OIG has now expanded into investigating FISA abuse.

You should stop now before embarrassing yourself any further.

[TSA]

That is all that is in this report. :rollin


HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAH AHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHaSplits you have some uninformed company :rollin


You think this is all that's coming from the OIG report?

The initial memo has 5 different aspects of the investigation and the OIG has now expanded into investigating FISA abuse.

[TSA]

Soooo, McCabe authorized a minor disclosure to a reporter, and then took some mild steps that basically involved not telling the entire truth when the issue came up.

Why is this important again?

:lol mild steps

[Splits]

Holy fuck you are making an ass of yourself. He lied October 16, 2016 to Comey. He lied on May 9th, 2017 under oath to INSD agents.



You should stop now before embarrassing yourself any further.

:lmao violating media policy

[TSA]

:lmao violating media policy

:lmao latching on to this and ignoring lying under oath multiple times

[Splits]

:lmao latching on to this and ignoring lying under oath multiple times


tell me more about the $700,000 Clinton Bribe

:lmao conclusion: violated media policy

[ElNono]

Who's Phase 2? Cohen?

[TSA]

tell me more about the $700,000 Clinton Bribe

:lmao conclusion: violated media policy

This release had nothing to do with his wife accepting campaign contributions, it's still being investigated dipshit. How many times must you be told about all of the different aspects the OIG was investigating? You even quoted the initial release laying it all out :rollin

Do you think this is the last report coming out of the OIG? :lol

https://i.imgur.com/5mAusqR.png

[TSA]

Who's Phase 2? Cohen?

*ding

[TSA]

984879587099381760

what a piece of shit

[RandomGuy]

Splits you have some uninformed company :rollin


You think this is all that's coming from the OIG report?

The initial memo has 5 different aspects of the investigation and the OIG has now expanded into investigating FISA abuse.

So what? I have no idea what you think is going on here.

So far we have "A leak happened, and someone was slow to cop to it".

What's next "someone spilled coffee and didn't clean it up?"

Connect the dots Sherlock.

[Pavlov]

What did Libby do that got a pardon from Trump today?

[ElNono]

*ding

damn dude, legit question

[TSA]

So what? I have no idea what you think is going on here.

So far we have "A leak happened, and someone was slow to cop to it".

What's next "someone spilled coffee and didn't clean it up?"

Connect the dots Sherlock.

:lol mild steps
:lol slow to cop to it
:lol semen shielding for the piece of shit McCabe

[TSA]

What did Libby do that got a pardon from Trump today?

*ding

[RandomGuy]

This release had nothing to do with his wife accepting campaign contributions, it's still being investigated dipshit. How many times must you be told about all of the different aspects the OIG was investigating? You even quoted the initial release laying it all out :rollin

Do you think this is the last report coming out of the OIG? :lol

https://i.imgur.com/5mAusqR.png

There we go, thanks. The other four bullet points.

That will be mildly interesting.

I look forward to something a bit more definitive. Given how hollow conservative talking points turn out to be when looked into by serious adults, I would not place money on them being the bomb shells you likely think them to be.

[Pavlov]

*ding

You're on a crusade about lying. But not really.

:lol TSA

[ElNono]

Don't even know who McCabe is, tbh

[spurraider21]

Who's Phase 2? Cohen?
i'm more excited for Phase 3

I present to you the conspiracy theory of all conspiracy theories---Anon phase 3 (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=264301&highlight=conspiracy+of+all+conspiracies)

[Chris]

pretty sure i mentioned to you weeks ago that OIG investigation is likely going to throw mccabe under the bus for lying about his disclosure to the WSJ

it did just that.

Pretty sure you didn't, but I may have missed it. Only people talking about Horowitz the last 2 months were TSA and yours truly.

[Spurminator]

.

[Chris]

984907879416147968
984910880138657792

[TSA]

984879587099381760

what a piece of shit

984908307159805952

[TSA]

984907879416147968
984910880138657792

but but but violating media policy was supposed to be it :rollin

[TSA]

:cry http://www.bromwichgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/MRB-statement-041318.pdf :cry

[Pavlov]

but but but violating media policy was supposed to be it :rollin

Were there any criminal referrals today?

[TSA]

984907879416147968
984910880138657792

984904920812998662

This misconduct investigation of McCabe didn't even originate from the OIG election investigation

:lol Splits

[baseline bum]

They finally indicted Susan Rice?

[spurraider21]

pretty sure i mentioned to you weeks ago that OIG investigation is likely going to throw mccabe under the bus for lying about his disclosure to the WSJ

it did just that.


Pretty sure you didn't, but I may have missed it. Only people talking about Horowitz the last 2 months were TSA and yours truly.

me weeks ago


arite, so lets say the IG report, as expected, paints McCabe as the leaker in that wall street journal article. that article wasn't a pro-clinton piece by any stretch. either way, mccabe thrown under the bus. arite. swamp drained.

what exactly is he gonna say about HRC emails, in your opinion? what results will his findings have?

is mccabe getting thrown under the bus the big boom?

[Chris]

me weeks ago

Congratulations tbh. Were you seeking brownie points for agreeing with TSA and me or is this a "I told you so" moment?

[clambake]

Congratulations tbh. Were you seeking brownie points for agreeing with TSA and me or is this a "I told you so" moment?

its a "you were wrong moment"

[Chris]

its a "you were wrong moment"

Wrong about what?

[Chris]

McCabe said he was going to "torch" (expose) the FBI. I wonder what kind of deal he's working out.

[RandomGuy]

They finally indicted Susan Rice?

That's in the next report.

[RandomGuy]

Phase 1: McCabe

https://static01.nyt.com/files/2018/us/politics/20180413a-doj-oig-mccabe-report.pdf

Phase 1 of Operation NothingBurger

You want no fries with that?

[Chris]

McCabe fires back!

984918161215688706

[Pavlov]

McCabe said he was going to "torch" (expose) the FBI. I wonder what kind of deal he's working out.Deal with whom? There aren't any charges against him.

[RandomGuy]

McCabe fires back!

984918161215688706

Looks like Trump's big mouth is gonna get him in trouble for yet another lawsuit. Trump already fucked over Cohen, and has been BEGGING for a lawyer to help save him from Mueller.

He will lose the Daniels thing, other women will come out of the freaking woodwork, with Daniels to help pay for legal costs and Aravetti right there to sweep them up.

At some point, these women will realize that Trump no longer has the power to harm them that he once did, and the Frankenstein monster of his past dick waggling will come unchained and go marauding through the castle.

[spurraider21]

Congratulations tbh. Were you seeking brownie points for agreeing with TSA and me or is this a "I told you so" moment?
no it's just me showing this report and the results were fairly expected and didn't give us too much new info. sessions already said mccabe was fired because OIG report said he lacked candor... now we just see that report that said he lacked candor.

[Chris]

Looks like Trump's big mouth is gonna get him in trouble for yet another lawsuit. Trump already fucked over Cohen, and has been BEGGING for a lawyer to help save him from Mueller.

He will lose the Daniels thing, other women will come out of the freaking woodwork, with Daniels to help pay for legal costs and Aravetti right there to sweep them up.

At some point, these women will realize that Trump no longer has the power to harm them that he once did, and the Frankenstein monster of his past dick waggling will come unchained and go marauding through the castle.

And then finally you will have proof that Donald Trump is a sexual predator.

Still waiting.

[ElNono]

McCabe fires back!

984918161215688706

Good timing, tbh... Trump doesn't have a lawyer at the moment, tee hee

[rastaspur]

Nunes has no credibility whatsoever. Its clear to me that he has been compromised or blackmailed.

[Chris]

Good timing, tbh... Trump doesn't have a lawyer at the moment, tee hee

:lol

[Blake]

:lmao latching on to this and ignoring lying under oath multiple times

So when do you or Q or the AR15 message board community expect criminal charges to be pressed?

[Winehole23]

What did Libby do that got a pardon from Trump today?Like both of the other DJT pardons, Scooter Libby is a white, male supporter who has been charged with obstruction of justice or defying court orders.

[TSA]

So when do you or Q or the AR15 message board community expect criminal charges to be pressed?

Justice IG sends criminal referral of Andrew McCabe to US attorney

https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/19/politics/justice-mccabe-criminal-referral/index.html
Splits :rollin

[TSA]

Phase 1 of Operation NothingBurger

You want no fries with that?

Animal style please :lmao

[spurraider21]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/inspector-general-referred-findings-on-mccabe-to-us-attorney-for-consideration-of-criminal-charges/2018/04/19/a200cabc-43f3-11e8-8569-26fda6b404c7_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.fb7d071050f8


The disclosure of which McCabe was accused of authorizing came in October 2016, around the time Comey would announce the FBI was resuming its probe of Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server. At the time, Devlin Barrett — then a reporter at the Wall Street Journal — was preparing a story on the bureau’s handling of that case and another investigation into the Clinton family foundation. McCabe felt the story would portray him and the FBI unfairly, so he authorized two other FBI officials to give Barrett his account. Barrett now works for The Washington Post.

Background conversations with reporters in Washington are commonplace, and McCabe had the authority, as the FBI’s deputy director, to authorize them. But the inspector general came to conclude he was acting out of self interest, and that violated FBI policy.

Of particular concern was that McCabe effectively authorized the FBI to confirm an ongoing investigation into the Clinton Foundation, by revealing a phone call in which he pushed back against a Justice Department official who warned that the bureau should not be taking overt steps in the case close to an election. McCabe asked the official: “Are you telling me that I need to shut down a validly predicated investigation?”

The inspector general wrote Comey inquired with his deputy about the disclosure, and McCabe led him to believe he did not know who was responsible. McCabe’s team, though, disputes that, and says emails between the two “clearly show that Mr. McCabe specifically advised Director Comey that he was working with colleagues at the FBI to correct inaccuracies in the story before it was published, and that they remained in contact through the weekend while the work was taking place.”

Inspector general investigators came to believe Comey, and they alleged McCabe lied on three other occasions to them and the FBI’s inspection division. Comey said in an appearance on “The View” this week: “I still believe Andrew McCabe is a good person, but the inspector general found that he lied, and there’s severe consequences in the Justice Department for lying — as there should be throughout the government.”

[Chucho]

So...this has produced even less backlash than the Mueller investigation, why is no one surprised?

[Pavlov]

So...this has produced even less backlash than the Mueller investigation, why is no one surprised?To be fair, there are more reports coming in the next month or so -- but if you go by the last OIG report about a right wing pet conspiracy theory, it's not going to shatter any worlds.

[hater]

Federal prosecutors bad now

[spurraider21]

So...this has produced even less backlash than the Mueller investigation, why is no one surprised?
because i'm not sure that mccabe's leaking has any major ramifications... he's in trouble for leaking to the WSJ that the FBI has an ongoing investigation into the clinton foundation. i dont see how that in and of itself proves any pro-clinton government conspiracy or anything like that.

if the future IG reports show that the FBI mishandled the clinton email investigation due to some political bias aimed at protecting her, that will be a big shoe to drop... or if they find some serious fisa abuse relating to the carter page warrants. those will be bigger stories

[Chucho]

because i'm not sure that mccabe's leaking has any major ramifications... he's in trouble for leaking to the WSJ that the FBI has an ongoing investigation into the clinton foundation. i dont see how that in and of itself proves any pro-clinton government conspiracy or anything like that.

if the future IG reports show that the FBI mishandled the clinton email investigation due to some political bias aimed at protecting her, that will be a big shoe to drop... or if they find some serious fisa abuse relating to the carter page warrants. those will be bigger stories


I'm hoping for something juicy form either/both reports. These threads are running on fumes.

[spurraider21]

I'm hoping for something juicy form either/both reports. These threads are running on fumes.
if they find out cohen was actually in prague that would be a significant development in the direction you probably dont like

[Chucho]

if they find out cohen was actually in prague that would be a significant development in the direction you probably dont like

Wont bother me in the least. I'm ready for him to be thrown out. Would love for both sides to take major, brutal hits, it'd be best for the country in cracking the partisanship stupidity and American politics as a whole.

[clambake]

Wont bother me in the least. I'm ready for him to be thrown out. Would love for both sides to take major, brutal hits, it'd be best for the country in cracking the partisanship stupidity and American politics as a whole.

thats the spirit!!!!

[Chucho]

thats the spirit!!!!


Hey, thanks man. I appreciate that.

[TSA]

I'm hoping for something juicy form either/both reports. These threads are running on fumes.

No need to hope, this thread delivered and will keep delivering. :bobo

[Chucho]

No need to hope, this thread delivered and will keep delivering. :bobo


I'm definitely missing something because all it's delivered is one referral. One referral. That's like djohn getting orgasmic about the nothings of the Mueller report happenings that aren't really doing what he said they were gonna do.

[Chris]

To be fair, there are more reports coming in the next month or so -- but if you go by the last OIG report about a right wing pet conspiracy theory, it's not going to shatter any worlds.

Horowitz is an Obama guy.

[Pavlov]

I'm definitely missing something because all it's delivered is one referral.Yep, OIG reports historically aren't the bombshells people want them to be.

[Pavlov]

Horowitz is an Obama guy.The conspiracy theories aren't Horowitz's, genius.

[spurraider21]

i just find it weird that the OIG report said it is being issued to the FBI "for such action that it deems appropriate" but now we're hearing they specifically referred it for prosecution

not that i doubt the veracity of today's reports, i just find it odd

[Pavlov]

i just find it weird that the OIG report said it is being issued to the FBI "for such action that it deems appropriate" but now we're hearing they specifically referred it for prosecution

not that i doubt the veracity of today's reports, i just find it oddAgreed. I guess since it's an FBI report the DOJ referral is considered a wholly separate thing?

[TSA]

I'm definitely missing something because all it's delivered is one referral. One referral. That's like djohn getting orgasmic about the nothings of the Mueller report happenings that aren't really doing what he said they were gonna do.

This criminal referral didn't even originate from the OIG election related investigation and was referred to the OIG by the FBI.
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-04-13%20DOJ%20OIG%20to%20CEG%20-%20McCabe%20with%20ROI.pdf


There is a lot more to come from the OIG.

https://i.imgur.com/5mAusqR.png

On top of all that Sessions also instructed Horowitz to investigate FISA abuse. Horowitz and Huber are just getting warmed up.

[Pavlov]

Regardless, I think successfully prosecuting McCabe would be a uphill battle. Trump's tweets alone could totally screw any shot at a jury trial.

[Blake]

Justice IG sends criminal referral of Andrew McCabe to US attorney

https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/19/politics/justice-mccabe-criminal-referral/index.html
Splits :rollin

"When exactly the referral was made to the US attorney's office was not immediately clear, and prosecutors there may decline to prosecute."

[Chucho]

This criminal referral didn't even originate from the OIG election related investigation and was referred to the OIG by the FBI.
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-04-13%20DOJ%20OIG%20to%20CEG%20-%20McCabe%20with%20ROI.pdf


There is a lot more to come from the OIG.

https://i.imgur.com/5mAusqR.png

On top of all that Sessions also instructed Horowitz to investigate FISA abuse. Horowitz and Huber are just getting warmed up.


Honestly, this sounds like a djohn post and is much ado about nothing really major. Again, I'm hoping for something juicy and, at this point, expect a whole bunch of the nothingness we're receiving from both sides.

[TSA]

Regardless, I think successfully prosecuting McCabe would be a uphill battle. Trump's tweets alone could totally screw any shot at a jury trial.

I'm sure even spurraider21 would be successful with lying under oath recorded on tape.

[Pavlov]

I'm sure even spurraider21 would be successful with lying under oath recorded on tape.It probably couldn't even get to that point with the President of the United States tainting the jury pool so completely.

[Chris]

It probably couldn't even get to that point with the President of the United States tainting the jury pool so completely.

Trump tweets tainting America - lawdy!

[TSA]

958145125120663553

[Blake]

Trump tweets tainting America - lawdy!

Disney subliminally tainting America's kids - lawdy lawdy

[Chris]

Disney subliminally tainting America's kids - lawdy lawdy

The more you know ;)

[Blake]

The more you know ;)

I know you'll never say how Disney is specifically doing it.

I also know you're retarded.

[Pavlov]

Trump tweets tainting America - lawdy!America's jury pool in a McCabe trial, yes.

Would probably apply to any potential Hillary Clinton trial too. Bad move by Dennison tbh.


958145125120663553Defending the institution would probably be part of McCabe's defense if a jury could even be found. We'll see if it even gets that far.

[Chris]

I know you'll never say how Disney is specifically doing it.

It's common knowledge.


I also know you're retarded.

Look at you big timing me.

[Chris]

America's jury pool in a McCabe trial, yes.

Would probably apply to any potential Hillary Clinton trial too. Bad move by Dennison tbh.

Defending the institution would probably be part of McCabe's defense if a jury could even be found. We'll see if it even gets that far.

You're concerned. You should be.

[Pavlov]

It's common knowledge.No, it isn't.

Tell us how it works.

[TSA]

America's jury pool in a McCabe trial, yes.

Would probably apply to any potential Hillary Clinton trial too. Bad move by Dennison tbh.

Defending the institution would probably be part of McCabe's defense if a jury could even be found. We'll see if it even gets that far.

:lol are you even reading what you're typing?

Defending the institution might have been a defense if he had just leaked the story to WSJ and admitted it. Instead he blamed two other offices for the leaks and then lied about it 4 separate times, including under oath.

[TSA]

Disney subliminally tainting America's kids - lawdy lawdy

oh look chumplite trying to derail another thread

[TSA]

No, it isn't.

Tell us how it works.

oh look chump also trying to derail the thread

[TSA]

You're concerned. You should be.

He doesn't care whether or not they're charged he just spent a year of his life saying they'll never be charged.

[Chris]

:lol are you even reading what you're typing?

Defending the institution might have been a defense if he had just leaked the story to WSJ and admitted it. Instead he blamed two other offices for the leaks and then lied about it 4 separate times, including under oath.

Trump tweets nullify any charges according to Pavlov.

[Pavlov]

:lol are you even reading what you're typing?

Defending the institution might have been a defense if he had just leaked the story to WSJ and admitted it. Instead he blamed two other offices for the leaks and then lied about it 4 separate times, including under oath.I am reading what I'm typing.

My prediction is it never gets that far.

What is your prediction, TSA?

[Chris]

He doesn't care whether or not they're charged he just spent a year of his life saying they'll never be charged.

:lol

[Pavlov]

Trump tweets nullify any charges according to Pavlov.Straw man. Why do you lie, Chris?

They are definitely a problem for prosecutors if they attempt a trial.

[Pavlov]

He doesn't care whether or not they're charged he just spent a year of his life saying they'll never be charged.I always said investigate everything and charge who they think should be charged.

You don't want certain things investigated and have declared investigations to be sham investigations.

You're shook.

[TSA]

I am reading what I'm typing.

My prediction is it never gets that far.

What is your prediction, TSA?

I predict it will get that far.

Explain how McCabe would use defending the institution as a defense.

[Pavlov]

I predict it will get that far.Then what?

Will he be convicted and put in prison?

[spurraider21]

Explain how McCabe would use defending the institution as a defense.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/inspector-general-referred-findings-on-mccabe-to-us-attorney-for-consideration-of-criminal-charges/2018/04/19/a200cabc-43f3-11e8-8569-26fda6b404c7_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.fb7d071050f8


The disclosure of which McCabe was accused of authorizing came in October 2016, around the time Comey would announce the FBI was resuming its probe of Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server. At the time, Devlin Barrett — then a reporter at the Wall Street Journal — was preparing a story on the bureau’s handling of that case and another investigation into the Clinton family foundation. McCabe felt the story would portray him and the FBI unfairly, so he authorized two other FBI officials to give Barrett his account. Barrett now works for The Washington Post.

[TSA]

I always said investigate everything and charge who they think should be charged.

You don't want certain things investigated and have declared investigations to be sham investigations.

You're shook.

When you are shook you start lying. I've never once said they shouldn't be investigating certain things. Calling an investigation a sham doesn't change that.

[Pavlov]

When you are shook you start lying. I've never once said they shouldn't be investigating certain things. Calling an investigation a sham doesn't change that.So you're saying they should be investigating Trump and possible connections to Russia and obstruction of justice?

Yes or no.

[Chris]

987063249836412928

[TSA]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/inspector-general-referred-findings-on-mccabe-to-us-attorney-for-consideration-of-criminal-charges/2018/04/19/a200cabc-43f3-11e8-8569-26fda6b404c7_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.fb7d071050f8


The disclosure of which McCabe was accused of authorizing came in October 2016, around the time Comey would announce the FBI was resuming its probe of Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server. At the time, Devlin Barrett — then a reporter at the Wall Street Journal — was preparing a story on the bureau’s handling of that case and another investigation into the Clinton family foundation. McCabe felt the story would portray him and the FBI unfairly, so he authorized two other FBI officials to give Barrett his account. Barrett now works for The Washington Post.

He was defending himself and acting in his own self interest, he wasn't defending the institution no matter how many times he claims it. Read the OIG report again. If he truly believed he was defending the institution he wouldn't have lied about it repeatedly while under oath. And the story he leaked was to try and cover the previous article the WSJ did on his wife's contributions.

[Blake]

oh look chumplite trying to derail another thread

It's a lame thread and I'm not doing anything to keep you from being more lame here.

[spurraider21]

He was defending himself and acting in his own self interest, he wasn't defending the institution no matter how many times he claims it. Read the OIG report again. If he truly believed he was defending the institution he wouldn't have lied about it repeatedly while under oath. And the story he leaked was to try and cover the previous article the WSJ did on his wife's contributions.
I know

from same article:

Background conversations with reporters in Washington are commonplace, and McCabe had the authority, as the FBI’s deputy director, to authorize them. But the inspector general came to conclude he was acting out of self interest, and that violated FBI policy.

[Chris]

"lame thread" :lol

Not good enough for big time Blake.

[Blake]

It's common knowledge.



Look at you big timing me.

I'm not claiming to be a subject matter on clinical retardedness.

It's just my average common person opinion that anyone that seriously thinks Disney is subliminally harming our kids is really retarded.

[Blake]

"lame thread" :lol

Not good enough for big time Blake.

Chris feels small.

[TSA]

So you're saying they should be investigating Trump and possible connections to Russia and obstruction of justice?

Yes or no.

I said from the start to investigate it all, I also said it was a huge waste of time and taxpayer dollars as I believed there was no Trump/Russia collusion and this was all just reactions to Hillary not winning and trying to cover for the illegal surveillance done during the run up to the election. Do you ever sit back and think none of this would have come to light if Hillary had won?

[TSA]

I know

from same article:

Background conversations with reporters in Washington are commonplace, and McCabe had the authority, as the FBI’s deputy director, to authorize them. But the inspector general came to conclude he was acting out of self interest, and that violated FBI policy.



So he wasn't defending the institution.

[TSA]

I'm not claiming to be a subject matter on clinical retardedness.

It's just my average common person opinion that anyone that seriously thinks Disney is subliminally harming our kids is really retarded.

So make a thread about it.

[spurraider21]

So he wasn't defending the institution.
the IG found that he was looking after his own self interest and not the institution.

that doesn't mean a jury would make the same finding. its why accident cases can still go to trial even if a police report says who was at fault.

right now our firm is defending a claim where the contractors state license board has found this guy did all kinds of violations and now have filed an action to strip his contractors license... but we're still defending the claim as we are disputing the CSLB's findings. mccabe could dispute the OIG's findings in court. call witnesses, etc.

[RandomGuy]

Regardless, I think successfully prosecuting McCabe would be a uphill battle. Trump's tweets alone could totally screw any shot at a jury trial.

This will fail, as so much conservative bullshit does, when it gets into a court and has to produce actual evidence in an adversarial situation. The laughingstock that is the Kansas voter ID trial typifies this.

[Pavlov]

I said from the start to investigate it all, I also said it was a huge waste of time and taxpayer dollars as I believed there was no Trump/Russia collusion and this was all just reactions to Hillary not winning and trying to cover for the illegal surveillance done during the run up to the election.You contradict yourself. I'll ask again so you can answer with a yes or no.

Should Trump be investigated for possible Russia connections and obstruction of justice?

Yes or no.


Do you ever sit back and think none of this would have come to light if Hillary had won?Actually I do believe most if not all would have come to light. It would just have been a lot easier without the obstruction from the executive and we wouldn't be kowtowing to Putin at every opportunity.

[Blake]

So make a thread about it.

Neh.

[TSA]

This will fail, as so much conservative bullshit does, when it gets into a court and has to produce actual evidence in an adversarial situation. The laughingstock that is the Kansas voter ID trial typifies this.

When it gets to court and has to produce actual evidence.....prosecutor Huber, "here is the taped recording of McCabe lying under oath twice"

Explain to me how this is "conservative bullshit". Horowitz is an Obama appointee. Democrats called on him to investigate.

[spurraider21]

When it gets to court and has to produce actual evidence.....prosecutor Huber, "here is the taped recording of McCabe lying under oath twice"

Explain to me how this is "conservative bullshit". Horowitz is an Obama appointee. Democrats called on him to investigate.
ok, lets say that either mccabe pleads guilty or is found guilty at trial

for lying about a leak made to the WSJ where he disclosed the ongoing investigation of the clinton foundation

what's the end game? is that it? what are the political points scored?

[AaronY]

BOOM!!!!
https://imgflip.com/i/28q1ka
https://i.imgflip.com/28q1ka.jpg

[Pavlov]

ok, lets say that either mccabe pleads guilty or is found guilty at trial

for lying about a leak made to the WSJ where he disclosed the ongoing investigation of the clinton foundation

what's the end game? is that it? what are the political points scored?Trump supporters thinking those who helped Trump must be punished!

Wait, that sounds wrong.

[TSA]

You contradict yourself. I'll ask again so you can answer with a yes or no.

Should Trump be investigated for possible Russia connections and obstruction of justice?

Yes or no.

"investigate it all"---there is no contradiction there. Investigating it all is uncovering how the investigation started in the first place.



Actually I do believe most if not all would have come to light. It would just have been a lot easier without the obstruction from the executive and we wouldn't be kowtowing to Putin at every opportunity.

Who would be investigating the weaponization of the intelligence community? You think Hillary would have authorized that? :lol

[Pavlov]

"investigate it all"---there is no contradiction there. Investigating it all is uncovering how the investigation started in the first place.I'll ask again so you can answer with a yes or no.

Should Trump be investigated for possible Russia connections and obstruction of justice?

Yes or no.



Who would be investigating the weaponization of the intelligence community? You think Hillary would have authorized that? :lol:lol weaponization

You still haven't said what stated the entire investigation into Russian interference in the election, TSA.

I'll ask you again -- what started the initial investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election?

[spurraider21]

also the standards for renewing a fisa warrant

[Splits]

:lmao "Justice Dept. watchdog sends McCabe findings to federal prosecutors for possible charges"


When non-Trump ally violates media policy, it is "animal style"

When Trump allies lie to FBI, are actually charged and/or plead guilty, it is "process crime"

TSA is the biggest fraud on this board

[TSA]

:lmao "Justice Dept. watchdog sends McCabe findings to federal prosecutors for possible charges"


When non-Trump ally violates media policy, it is "animal style"

When Trump allies lie to FBI, are actually charged and/or plead guilty, it is "process crime"

TSA is the biggest fraud on this board

^^^
This stupid fuck still thinks he’s being recommended for criminal charges for violating FBI media policy :lmao

[AaronY]

McCabe?!?!? Moar like McRube!

Amirite TSA or amirite?

[TSA]

987383284547104768

:lol Jim

[Spurminator]

Guess the memos didn't tell the story you wanted so leaks bad now.

[TSA]

Guess the memos didn't tell the story you wanted so leaks bad now.

Memos hurt Comey not Trump.
Obama appointee decided leaks bad now not TSA.

[Blake]

Memos hurt Comey not Trump.


Except for the part where Trump said he never went to Russia?

[TSA]

Except for the part where Trump said he never went to Russia?

:lol he never said that. Maybe try actually reading the memos.

[Spurminator]

Memos hurt Comey not Trump.
Obama appointee decided leaks bad now not TSA.

In my opinion the memos only hurt the guy who suggested journalists should be jailed until they reveal their sources, and the rest is pretty benign. But banana republic America good now. #MAGA

[Spurminator]

Memos hurt Comey not Trump.
Obama appointee decided leaks bad now not TSA.

Also don't insult my intelligence with the "Obama appointee" bullshit, save that retarded logic for 4chan.

[TSA]

Also don't insult my intelligence with the "Obama appointee" bullshit, save that retarded logic for 4chan.

https://media.giphy.com/media/cEYFeDKVPTmRgIG9fmo/giphy.gif

[TSA]

Bromwich added that his team hasn't managed to find any witnesses to corroborate McCabe's version of the story, but said they also haven't had the necessary time to do so.

https://www.axios.com/andrew-mccabe-fbi-james-comey-civil-lawsuit-trump-398b0c8a-3634-43bb-8498-29b536923cb8.html

:rollin

[TSA]

988900256975872003

[Chris]

Hah beat me to it

[boutons_deux]

Of course political tool hack racist JeBo will give ammo to the Repugs as the Repugs slander the FBI, like they've slandered science, facts, history

Fuck the Repugs and fuck all you Repugs supporters. YOU are THE problem with America.

[Pavlov]

988900256975872003And the whole thing will be leaked to the press within an hour of receipt because TSA declares leaks to be good and has always said leaks are good without exception.

lol

It will also not matter.

[Chris]

And the whole thing will be leaked to the press within an hour of receipt because TSA declares leaks to be good and has always said leaks are good without exception.

lol

It will also not matter.

You're terrified :lol good good

[RandomGuy]

And the whole thing will be leaked to the press within an hour of receipt because TSA declares leaks to be good and has always said leaks are good without exception.

lol

It will also not matter.

I have given money to Nunes' opponent. :D

[Pavlov]

You're terrified :lol good goodlol Nope.

You'll find some awesome shit talking about Dennison and Clinton, but not much else.

[Chucho]

YOU are THE problem with America.

A random psychopath racist who spends inexcusable amounts of time posting hack articles and ranting endlessly on a basketball message board is absolutely the most qualified person to make this assessment.

[TSA]

And the whole thing will be leaked to the press within an hour of receipt because TSA declares leaks to be good and has always said leaks are good without exception.

lol

It will also not matter.

You sure did enjoy the leak that started the 900+ page Flynn thread

[AaronY]

Bromwich added that his team hasn't managed to find any witnesses to corroborate McCabe's version of the story, but said they also haven't had the necessary time to do so.

https://www.axios.com/andrew-mccabe-fbi-james-comey-civil-lawsuit-trump-398b0c8a-3634-43bb-8498-29b536923cb8.html

:rollin
bro, i made you this supercool image and youre not even using it

https://i.imgflip.com/28q1ka.jpg

[TSA]

bro, i made you this supercool image and youre not even using it

https://i.imgflip.com/28q1ka.jpg:bobo

[TSA]

988916783699714050

[Pavlov]

988916783699714050lol Betteridge

[Splits]

Now, Sara Carter also is here with breaking news, sources tonight telling her that McCabe's exit is just the beginning of more resignations, firings, to come at the FBI.

And also breaking this hour, this is huge, the House Intelligence Committee has voted to publicly release the classified memo, release the memo. We've been telling you all week, that shows severe FISA abuse against members of the Trump campaign. Now, the president needs to get final approval before you can see it.

HANNITY: The reason that this will be coming out and I'm glad that the White House told me tonight that they will be deliberative, that they're taking it seriously, they're not rushing out with it. Obviously, the State of the Union tomorrow, I'm hoping we'd see this by Wednesday night or Thursday.But they're doing the right thing because this is not a game. We are talking about people's lives, we're talking about potential crimes, we're talking about people being charged, going to jail but more importantly, and the scary part of this and I'll throw this to Sara for more information -- is that we have now weaponized the powerful tools of intelligence. FISA is important because we -- that means that's our government spying on citizens, and if Hillary's bought and paid for dossier was the foundation to do this, wow.

CARTER: Sean, it was a very shoddy foundation.

HANNITY: To influence a presidential election.

CARTER: A duly elected president of the United States, voted for by the people of this country, Sean, this is bigger than anything anybody can imagine.

HANNITY: And when you say that, this makes Watergate like stealing a Snickers bar from a drugstore.

CARTER: Absolutely

:lmao Sara Carter

[Splits]

988916783699714050

:lmao the top comment on her "news"


Notable Replies
https://forums.saraacarter.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v2/letter/y/f6c823/64.pngYeOldPatriot (https://forums.saraacarter.com/t/did-mccabe-issue-stand-down-order-on-fbi-clinton-email-investigation/375)says:
April 25, 2018
Ho, hum, another laugher from Sara Carter.

This post is just another classic Sara Carter, John Solomon, Hannity, Fox News, House Republicans deception and deflection article.
You can spot them right away by the collection of known facts about anything connected by a lot of conspiracy theory using “may,” “did,” “might,” “it’s possible,” “if true” “sources tell me,” etc., with the sources being Republican congressmen and staffers, and current and former disgruntled knee-jerk Republican/anti-Democrat FBI agents, DOJ personnel, and cops.

And you’ll note that this Trump investigation deflection distraction article comes just as its been proven that Trump lied to Comey about spending the night in Moscow, how Manafort was on the FBI radar scope before Trump even decided to run, talk of Cohen flipping is increasing (what possibly could there be for Cohen to flip on “innocent” Trump?), …

Next up from Sara Carter and the Trump deflection/distraction team:

BREAKING: Did McCabe order the “Hit” on Seth Richards at the behest of Bill and Hillary Clinton, Terry McAuliffe, and George Soros?"




:lmao Sara Carter

[TSA]

So this is what a nothingburger looks like :lmao

"lack of candor" :lol
Justice IG sends criminal referral of Andrew McCabe to US attorney

https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/19/politics/justice-mccabe-criminal-referral/index.html

:lmao Splits

[Splits]

Justice IG sends criminal referral of Andrew McCabe to US attorney

https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/19/politics/justice-mccabe-criminal-referral/index.html

:lmao Splits

:lol You can't even properly quote your own article

"Justice Dept. watchdog sends McCabe findings to federal prosecutors for possible charges"

[Splits]

Hannity: this makes Watergate like stealing a Snickers bar from a drugstore.


CARTER: Absolutely

:lmao Sara Carter

[TSA]

:lol You can't even properly quote your own article

"Justice Dept. watchdog sends McCabe findings to federal prosecutors for possible charges"

:lol CNN changing their original title to soften the blow for McCabe

:lol raising $500,000 for a nothingburger

:lmao Splits

[Splits]

:cry process crime important now :cry

[Pavlov]

:lol CNN changing their original title to soften the blow for McCabeHow does that soften the blow?

Would calling it a "process crime" be softening the blow?

[AaronY]

:bobo
lmao :rollin

[Chris]

Justice IG sends criminal referral of Andrew McCabe to US attorney

https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/19/politics/justice-mccabe-criminal-referral/index.html

:lmao Splits

989372260782956544

*Risitas x 1000

[Chris]

Comey lawyering up

989374735028015104

[Pavlov]

Comey lawyering up

989374735028015104Nobody bought Gorka's book, but both were fired by Dennison. If it's Fitzgerald, dude has been Comey's lawyer for a year.

lol

[TSA]

997164344499671040

[Pavlov]

997164344499671040Leaks good now.

[Spurminator]

Why does an author and writer for the NY Post have an unverified Twitter account with a "_" by his name and why is he using an image of himself from Google Image search as his avatar?

[TSA]

Why does an author and writer for the NY Post have an unverified Twitter account with a "_" by his name and why is he using an image of himself from Google Image search as his avatar?

Why don't you just ask him yourself on Twitter?

[Spurminator]

Why don't you just ask him yourself on Twitter?

He's not my source.

Unverified sources good now?

[TSA]

He's not my source.

Unverified sources good now?

Louise Mensch has a verified twitter account

[Spurminator]

Louise Mensch has a verified twitter account

Because they know it's actually Louise Mensch's account.

[Spurminator]

Any updates on this? So weird to see BREAKING NEWS like that just kind of die...

[hater]

Both demorats and republicunts are boring

Hype up their bullshit reports two weeks before they come out and when they come out its a meh

What a shithole country tbqh

[Pavlov]

Hey, hater took both sides of an issue!

[TSA]

Any updates on this? So weird to see BREAKING NEWS like that just kind of die...

you have the patience of a millenial

[spurraider21]

Because they know it's actually Louise Mensch's account.
i don't doubt that it's actually Paul Sperry

[Spurminator]

you have the patience of a millenial

It's been 4 hours since the tweet.

You have the awareness-of-how-news-works of a Baby Boomer.

[Pavlov]

i don't doubt that it's actually Paul SperryOdd that it's not verified, but Sperry does go into deep state rants.

[Spurminator]

i don't doubt that it's actually Paul Sperry

It could be. But most writers with his resume have verified accounts, or at least a professional headshot.

Seems a little weird that a writer for the NY Post and RCP has a breaking news story like this and hasn't written an article about it yet.

[TSA]

997179848320745472

[hater]

The OIG just fartd and is walking toward the toilet to take a shit. And think about finishing his report.

[TSA]

997231931828965376

[hater]

The OIG is taking an extremely long shit

[TSA]

997284097192968193

[spurraider21]

:lol smart move to downplay expectations tbh

[boutons_deux]

you right wing assholes would SHRUG if the FBI was "mishandling" Trash's investigation in order to exonerate Trash.

But since your conspiracy is that FBI exonerated Hillary, you're outraged, and extending your outrageous conspiracies into one that says FBI is "mishandling" Trash's investigation to culpabilise him and his mafiya.

[TSA]

:lol smart move to downplay expectations tbh

What are these expectations that you think need to be downplayed?

[TSA]

Because they know it's actually Louise Mensch's account.

chuck ross maybe?

997286500709617664

[Spurminator]

chuck ross maybe?

997286500709617664

I don't know what this has to do with our previous exchange. This is a column being shared, not a "BREAKING NEWS" tweet with no backup. I have no questions about the validity of this tweet.

[spurraider21]

What are these expectations that you think need to be downplayed?
ask kimberly strassel. shes the one who is telling folks to manage expectations

[TSA]

ask kimberly strassel. shes the one who is telling folks to manage expectations

And you said it was a smart move to downplay those expectations. What expectations were you referring to?

[Pavlov]

:lol TSA hedging already

[TSA]

:lol TSA hedging already

:lol hedging

I’ve got $2000 out there what’s another 99,999 posts.

[Pavlov]

:lol hedging

I’ve got $2000 out there what’s another 99,999 posts.Expectations firmly downplayed.

:lol

[Chucho]

LOL, NOTHING, absolutely NOTHING will happen from this report.

Avante will win a unanimous landslide during the next Blues/Track expert election before anything of real substance happens to Hildog or the Clinton Cartel. I would absolutely love to see something happen to her but I can't fool myself with false hope of a worthless report.

[Pavlov]

LOL, NOTHING, absolutely NOTHING will happen from this report.

Avante will win a unanimous landslide during the next Blues/Track expert election before anything of real substance happens to Hildog or the Clinton Cartel. I would absolutely love to see something happen to her but I can't fool myself with false hope of a worthless report.lol Avante reference

Well, the Clinton investigation was so rushed and unusual that I can see a couple criminal referrals coming out of the OIG.

No convictions though. Any jury is going to be lectured on how fucked up everything was in 2016 -- and they will agree.

[TSA]

lol Avante reference

Well, the Clinton investigation was so rushed and unusual that I can see a couple criminal referrals coming out of the OIG.

No convictions though. Any jury is going to be lectured on how fucked up everything was in 2016 -- and they will agree.

:lol Pavlov already hedging

[Pavlov]

:lol Pavlov already hedging:lol no

[TSA]

:lol no

Keep telling yourself that.

What criminal referrals from the OIG could you see coming out of the Clinton investigation?

What do you mean by 2016 being “fucked up”?

Why would something being “fucked up” be an excuse to let crimes slide?

[Pavlov]

Keep telling yourself that.

What criminal referrals from the OIG could you see coming out of the Clinton investigation?

What do you mean by 2016 being “fucked up”?

Why would something being “fucked up” be an excuse to let crimes slide?:lol questions three.

It's not going to be as good as you want it to be.

That's what I said before. That's what I'm saying now.

[spurraider21]

:lol questions three.

It's not going to be as good as you want it to be.

That's what I said before. That's what I'm saying now.
can you put that on a scale of 1-10 pls

[TSA]

:lol questions three.

It's not going to be as good as you want it to be.

That's what I said before. That's what I'm saying now.

That’s wonderful but has nothing to do with my questions you so pussily dodges. Try again.

What criminal referrals from the OIG could you see coming out of the Clinton investigation?

What do you mean by 2016 being “fucked up”?

Why would something being “fucked up” be an excuse to let crimes slide?

[Pavlov]

can you put that on a scale of 1-10 plsIT'S FLUID

[Pavlov]

That’s wonderful but has nothing to do with my questions you so pussily dodges. Try again.

What criminal referrals from the OIG could you see coming out of the Clinton investigation?

What do you mean by 2016 being “fucked up”?

Why would something being “fucked up” be an excuse to let crimes slide?Sorry, you're behind on answering questions.

Quit being a pussy and answer them.

Here's the big one.

Why did the Clinton campaign not use the Russia meeting after you claimed they set the whole thing up to frame team Trump?

[TSA]

Sorry, you're behind on answering questions.

Quit being a pussy and answer them.

Here's the big one.

Why did the Clinton campaign not use the Russia meeting after you claimed they set the whole thing up to frame team Trump?

I never claimed the Clinton campaign set up the meeting with the Russian lawyer. And there was nothing for her campaign to use from that meeting anyways.

“hey guyz the oppo research firm we hired set up a meeting with Don Jr and a Russian lawyer, btw that Russian lawyer works with the firm we hired for oppo research”

Stop being a bitch and answer questions about statements you just made ITT.

What criminal referrals from the OIG could you see coming out of the Clinton investigation?

What do you mean by 2016 being “fucked up”?

Why would something being “fucked up” be an excuse to let crimes slide?

[DarrinS]

“hey guyz the oppo research firm we hired set up a meeting with Don Jr and a Russian lawyer, btw that Russian lawyer works with the firm we hired for oppo research”



Just an incredible coincidence. :lol

[Pavlov]

I never claimed the Clinton campaign set up the meeting with the Russian lawyer. And there was nothing for her campaign to use from that meeting anyways.

“hey guyz the oppo research firm we hired set up a meeting with Don Jr and a Russian lawyer, btw that Russian lawyer works with the firm we hired for oppo research”

Stop being a bitch and answer questions about statements you just made ITT.

What criminal referrals from the OIG could you see coming out of the Clinton investigation?

What do you mean by 2016 being “fucked up”?

Why would something being “fucked up” be an excuse to let crimes slide?
Wait. What is your adoption meeting conspiracy then?

[TSA]

Wait. What is your adoption meeting conspiracy then?The meeting was a set up to “establish” Russian connections. Direct further questions to
Glenn Simpson.

It’s time to stop being a bitch and answer questions about statements you just made ITT.

What criminal referrals from the OIG could you see coming out of the Clinton investigation?

What do you mean by 2016 being “fucked up”?

Why would something being “fucked up” be an excuse to let crimes slide?

[Pavlov]

Sorry, you said Clinton knew everything Fusion GPS was doing.

Or was that fluid?

Seriously, tell me what your conspiracy theory is today. You're going to change it forty more times so just say what it is right now.

[TSA]

Sorry, you said Clinton knew everything Fusion GPS was doing.

Or was that fluid?

Seriously, tell me what your conspiracy theory is today. You're going to change it forty more times so just say what it is right now.

Sorry, I never said Clinton knew everything Fusion GPS was doing. You already crashed and burned trying to push that narrative.

It’s time to stop being a bitch and answer questions about statements you made ITT.

What criminal referrals from the OIG could you see coming out of the Clinton investigation?

What do you mean by 2016 being “fucked up”?

Why would something being “fucked up” be an excuse to let crimes slide?

[Spurminator]

you have the patience of a millenial

Still nothing?

[Pavlov]

Sorry, I never said Clinton knew everything Fusion GPS was doing. You already crashed and burned trying to push that narrative.So your Fusion GPS conspiracy theory doesn't even exist.


It’s time to stop being a bitch and answer questions about statements you made ITT.

What criminal referrals from the OIG could you see coming out of the Clinton investigation?Honestly, not many at all. Maybe a process crime or two.


What do you mean by 2016 being “fucked up”?I view 2016 as an unusual year in American history.


Why would something being “fucked up” be an excuse to let crimes slide?I think it may be hard to prove the process crimes beyond a reasonable doubt because of the rather extraordinary circumstances in 2016.

What crimes do you think will be referred by the OIG after this report?

[TSA]

So your Fusion GPS conspiracy theory doesn't even exist.

Honestly, not many at all. Maybe a process crime or two.

I view 2016 as an unusual year in American history.

I think it may be hard to prove the process crimes beyond a reasonable doubt because of the rather extraordinary circumstances in 2016.

What crimes do you think will be referred by the OIG after this report?

Not sure tbh...haven’t read the report.

[TSA]

998315694755328001

998315738472513537

998315770202460160

[Pavlov]

Not sure tbh...haven’t read the report.
:lol TSA already hedging

[Chucho]

Still nothing?


It's a post from the future! We will see this same thing in 2 weeks, 1 month, 6 months and so on...

[spurraider21]

Not sure tbh...haven’t read the report.
damn. can't even put his confidence on a scale of 1-10

[Chris]

998454020518838272

[Pavlov]

998454020518838272What's magical about that, Chris?

And how did the FISA warrant get renewed three times well into the Dennison administration?

[TSA]

damn. can't even put his confidence on a scale of 1-10

Where was I asked my confidence level?

[Pavlov]

Where was I asked my confidence level?

You said you have to read the report before you could even say what criminal referrals you think would be made. That isn't great confidence tbh.

[TSA]

You said you have to read the report before you could even say what criminal referrals you think would be made. That isn't great confidence tbh.

The two aren't mutually exclusive.

[Pavlov]

The two aren't mutually exclusive.You can't even say what you think at this point after a solid year of innuendo.

[spurraider21]

The two aren't mutually exclusive.
oh tell us how confident you are in your thoughts that you've already said = pissing in the wind

[Spurminator]

Surprised (SHOCKED) this hasn't been posted. Must not be a popular news item in the Posobiec/Q-sphere.

998639564188086272

So, basically the FBI still should have found nothing incriminating in the emails, just they should have done it a lot earlier and not as close to the election (which may have been affected by the late announcement by Comey of the reopening of the investigation).

Is that what you guys were hoping for?

:lol

[spurraider21]

997164344499671040


Surprised (SHOCKED) this hasn't been posted. Must not be a popular news item in the Posobiec/Q-sphere.

998639564188086272

So, basically the FBI still should have found nothing incriminating in the emails, just they should have done it a lot earlier and not as close to the election (which may have been affected by the late announcement by Comey of the reopening of the investigation).

Is that what you guys were hoping for?

:lol
:corn:

[Pavlov]

UNLAWFUL EXONERATION

[Spurminator]

Never thought I'd see this thread plummet to the 2nd page so soon after the report was submitted. Better hold it up here in case the shocking revelations we were all expecting finally come to light.

[TSA]

Never thought I'd see this thread plummet to the 2nd page so soon after the report was submitted. Better hold it up here in case the shocking revelations we were all expecting finally come to light.

OIG livin rent free

[TSA]

998770216321433600

Horowitz providing the emails :bobo

[Spurminator]

OIG livin rent free

True, if there's anyone here who is disproportionately interested in the OIG report, it me.

[TSA]

998939944260440064