Democrats sue Russia, Trump campaign for alleged 2016 election conspiracy

[Mikeanaro]

https://www.yahoo.com/news/democratic-party-sues-russia-trump-campaign-allegedly-disrupting-152040359.html

(https://www.yahoo.com/news/democratic-party-sues-russia-trump-campaign-allegedly-disrupting-152040359.html)By Mark Hosenball and David Alexander
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Democratic Party sued the Russian government, U.S. President Donald Trump's campaign and WikiLeaks on Friday, charging that they carried out a wide-ranging conspiracy to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
Related SearchesDemocratic Party (https://search.yahoo.com/search?p=Democratic%20Party&fr=c2ssa&c2slid=l1524251012884_88842&c2smid=m1524251012892_39131&_c2ssa=g&c2sm_algoVer=1.20.1)2016 Presidential Election (https://search.yahoo.com/search?p=2016%20Presidential%20Election&fr=c2ssa&c2slid=l1524251012884_88842&c2smid=m1524251012892_39131&_c2ssa=g&c2sm_algoVer=1.20.1)2016 Presidential Candidates (https://search.yahoo.com/search?p=2016%20Presidential%20Candidates&fr=c2ssa&c2slid=l1524251012884_88842&c2smid=m1524251012892_39131&_c2ssa=g&c2sm_algoVer=1.20.1)Next Presidential Election (https://search.yahoo.com/search?p=Next%20Presidential%20Election&fr=c2ssa&c2slid=l1524251012884_88842&c2smid=m1524251012892_39131&_c2ssa=g&c2sm_algoVer=1.20.1)Trump And Russia (https://search.yahoo.com/search?p=Trump%20And%20Russia&fr=c2ssa&c2slid=l1524251012884_88842&c2smid=m1524251012892_39131&_c2ssa=g&c2sm_algoVer=1.20.1)

The party alleges in the federal lawsuit in Manhattan that top Trump campaign officials conspired with the Russian government and its military spy agency to hurt Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton and tilt the election to Trump by hacking Democratic Party computers.
The lawsuit alleges that Republican Trump's campaign "gleefully welcomed Russia's help" in the 2016 election and accuses it of being a "racketeering enterprise" that worked in tandem with Moscow.


“During the 2016 presidential campaign, Russia launched an all-out assault on our democracy and it found a willing and active partner in Donald Trump’s campaign," said Tom Perez, chair of the Democratic National Convention. "This constituted an act of unprecedented treachery."
Defendants in the suit include three people who have been indicted as a result of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation of Russian meddling: former campaign chairman Paul Manafort, Manafort associate Rick Gates and former campaign aide George Papadopoulos.


Also named as defendants were Donald Trump Jr., Trump associate Roger Stone and Trump's son-in-law, Jared Kushner.
The White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Trump has repeatedly denied his campaign colluded with Russia and Moscow has denied meddling in the election.
Four U.S. intelligence agencies reported last year that Russia sponsored the hacking of Democratic Party groups and other actions during the 2016 campaign. Part of the effort was to benefit Trump over Clinton, the agencies said.


The DNC blames Russia for breaches of its computer systems in 2015 and the first half of 2016.

Hackers disseminated internal communications of party officials as the Democratic nominating convention began and WikiLeaks released thousands of emails, some of which were embarrassing for the Clinton campaign and were intended to stoke conflicts among the party’s supporters.
Most of the accusations appeared to be based on news reports and publicly available legal documents and offered little new information about alleged collusion with Moscow.

MIDTERM EFFECT

Democrats are keen to remind voters of the issue of Russia and the 2016 election ahead of November's midterm congressional elections. Early polls show Republicans run some risk of losing control of Congress.


“The suit gives Democrats a useful and perhaps compelling narrative to counter the president’s and Republicans’ mantra of ‘no collusion,'" said Leonard Williams, a political science professor at Manchester University. "From that partisan standpoint, it is exactly what their candidates and spokespeople need."
The Republican National Committee, the Trump campaign, Trump campaign manager Michael Glassner, WikiLeaks, and attorneys for Trump Jr., Manafort, Gates and Papadopoulos also did not immediately respond to requests for comment.


Stone said the lawsuit was based on "a left-wing conspiracy theory." "NO proof or evidence," he wrote in an email to Reuters.
The lawsuit, should it go forward, seems likely to help keep the spotlight on the issue of Russian election interference and possible collusion by the Trump campaign. Both are being investigated by Mueller, whose office declined to comment on the Democratic lawsuit.


Through the process of legal discovery, lawyers for the Democratic Party could force the defendants to produce documents they say relate to the collusion issue.
The lawsuit "might not have any journalistic, judicial, or political staying power," Williams said.
"Whether it amounts to more than a story to tell remains to be seen. It might lead to additional discovery of events and relationships that we don’t yet know about," he said.
(Reporting by David Alexander; Additional reporting by Ginger Gibson, Lisa Lambert and Warren Strobel; Writing by Alistair Bell; editing by Jonathan Oatis and Bill Trott)


Blah Blah, THE RUSSIANS!!!!

HURTS MY FEELINGS!
(https://www.yahoo.com/news/democratic-party-sues-russia-trump-campaign-allegedly-disrupting-152040359.html)

[hater]

:lmao

Them tears are delicious :lol

Hope they televise this shit. Niggas cheated on bernie and commited all sorts of crimes behind Shitleryglad this all will come to ligh

[boutons_deux]

makes more sense

than Repugs asking JeBo to indict a list of Dems as criminals. I figure JeBo will do it if some of his more adult, more professional, untainted underlings don't stop him

[sickdsm]

The irony is that 9 out of 10 readers of that story will think that the Democrats should sue the dfl for the election fraud of the primary.

[RandomGuy]

https://www.yahoo.com/news/democratic-party-sues-russia-trump-campaign-allegedly-disrupting-152040359.html

(https://www.yahoo.com/news/democratic-party-sues-russia-trump-campaign-allegedly-disrupting-152040359.html)By Mark Hosenball and David Alexander
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Democratic Party sued the Russian government, U.S. President Donald Trump's campaign and WikiLeaks on Friday, charging that they carried out a wide-ranging conspiracy to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
Related SearchesDemocratic Party (https://search.yahoo.com/search?p=Democratic%20Party&fr=c2ssa&c2slid=l1524251012884_88842&c2smid=m1524251012892_39131&_c2ssa=g&c2sm_algoVer=1.20.1)2016 Presidential Election (https://search.yahoo.com/search?p=2016%20Presidential%20Election&fr=c2ssa&c2slid=l1524251012884_88842&c2smid=m1524251012892_39131&_c2ssa=g&c2sm_algoVer=1.20.1)2016 Presidential Candidates (https://search.yahoo.com/search?p=2016%20Presidential%20Candidates&fr=c2ssa&c2slid=l1524251012884_88842&c2smid=m1524251012892_39131&_c2ssa=g&c2sm_algoVer=1.20.1)Next Presidential Election (https://search.yahoo.com/search?p=Next%20Presidential%20Election&fr=c2ssa&c2slid=l1524251012884_88842&c2smid=m1524251012892_39131&_c2ssa=g&c2sm_algoVer=1.20.1)Trump And Russia (https://search.yahoo.com/search?p=Trump%20And%20Russia&fr=c2ssa&c2slid=l1524251012884_88842&c2smid=m1524251012892_39131&_c2ssa=g&c2sm_algoVer=1.20.1)

The party alleges in the federal lawsuit in Manhattan that top Trump campaign officials conspired with the Russian government and its military spy agency to hurt Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton and tilt the election to Trump by hacking Democratic Party computers.
The lawsuit alleges that Republican Trump's campaign "gleefully welcomed Russia's help" in the 2016 election and accuses it of being a "racketeering enterprise" that worked in tandem with Moscow.


“During the 2016 presidential campaign, Russia launched an all-out assault on our democracy and it found a willing and active partner in Donald Trump’s campaign," said Tom Perez, chair of the Democratic National Convention. "This constituted an act of unprecedented treachery."
Defendants in the suit include three people who have been indicted as a result of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation of Russian meddling: former campaign chairman Paul Manafort, Manafort associate Rick Gates and former campaign aide George Papadopoulos.


Also named as defendants were Donald Trump Jr., Trump associate Roger Stone and Trump's son-in-law, Jared Kushner.
The White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Trump has repeatedly denied his campaign colluded with Russia and Moscow has denied meddling in the election.
Four U.S. intelligence agencies reported last year that Russia sponsored the hacking of Democratic Party groups and other actions during the 2016 campaign. Part of the effort was to benefit Trump over Clinton, the agencies said.


The DNC blames Russia for breaches of its computer systems in 2015 and the first half of 2016.

Hackers disseminated internal communications of party officials as the Democratic nominating convention began and WikiLeaks released thousands of emails, some of which were embarrassing for the Clinton campaign and were intended to stoke conflicts among the party’s supporters.
Most of the accusations appeared to be based on news reports and publicly available legal documents and offered little new information about alleged collusion with Moscow.

MIDTERM EFFECT

Democrats are keen to remind voters of the issue of Russia and the 2016 election ahead of November's midterm congressional elections. Early polls show Republicans run some risk of losing control of Congress.


“The suit gives Democrats a useful and perhaps compelling narrative to counter the president’s and Republicans’ mantra of ‘no collusion,'" said Leonard Williams, a political science professor at Manchester University. "From that partisan standpoint, it is exactly what their candidates and spokespeople need."
The Republican National Committee, the Trump campaign, Trump campaign manager Michael Glassner, WikiLeaks, and attorneys for Trump Jr., Manafort, Gates and Papadopoulos also did not immediately respond to requests for comment.


Stone said the lawsuit was based on "a left-wing conspiracy theory." "NO proof or evidence," he wrote in an email to Reuters.
The lawsuit, should it go forward, seems likely to help keep the spotlight on the issue of Russian election interference and possible collusion by the Trump campaign. Both are being investigated by Mueller, whose office declined to comment on the Democratic lawsuit.


Through the process of legal discovery, lawyers for the Democratic Party could force the defendants to produce documents they say relate to the collusion issue.
The lawsuit "might not have any journalistic, judicial, or political staying power," Williams said.
"Whether it amounts to more than a story to tell remains to be seen. It might lead to additional discovery of events and relationships that we don’t yet know about," he said.
(Reporting by David Alexander; Additional reporting by Ginger Gibson, Lisa Lambert and Warren Strobel; Writing by Alistair Bell; editing by Jonathan Oatis and Bill Trott)


Blah Blah, THE RUSSIANS!!!!

HURTS MY FEELINGS!
(https://www.yahoo.com/news/democratic-party-sues-russia-trump-campaign-allegedly-disrupting-152040359.html)

It will get into a court, where evidence matters, and opens up a new front against a thinly-staffed administration in complete disarray.

Good.

[sickdsm]

It will get into a court, where evidence matters, and opens up a new front against a thinly-staffed administration in complete disarray.

Good.

RG more interested in hoping Trump has more rough patches than to hope for smooth sailing for America. Seems pretty typical of partisians like you, bou, Chris, etc......

[TSA]

It will get into a court, where evidence matters, and opens up a new front against a thinly-staffed administration in complete disarray.

Good.

Also getting into court, the DNC servers, Crowdstrike, Cheryl Mills, Paul Combetta, Brian Pagliano, Heather Samuelson, John Bentel...need I go on? Terrible idea for Democrats :rollin

[Pavlov]

Also getting into court, the DNC servers, Crowdstrike, Cheryl Mills, Paul Combetta, Brian Pagliano, Heather Samuelson, John Bentel...need I go on? Terrible idea for Democrats :rollinWhat crimes are you saying each committed, TSA?

[TSA]

What crimes are you saying each committed, TSA?

Where did I say they committed crimes Pavlov?

[hater]

Yup they gonna have to give up the servers to proove they were hacked

This shit wont work with “intelligence sources said so” :lmao

Terrible move wspecially if they have to bring out Waserman Shits to answer questions :lmao

[Pavlov]

Where did I say they committed crimes Pavlov?Are you accusing them of anything, TSA?

Yes or no.

[CosmicCowboy]

Is this from the onion? Its that stupid.

[TSA]

Are you accusing them of anything, TSA?

Yes or no.

I did not Pavlov. Will they be called to testify? Will their immunity deals still be valid?

[Pavlov]

I did not Pavlov. Will they be called to testify? Will their immunity deals still be valid?Immunity in jeopardy? That implies a crime was committed.

What crimes are you saying they committed?

[TSA]

Immunity in jeopardy? That implies a crime was committed.

What crimes are you saying they committed?

You are going to have to start answering questions if you'd like to continue the discussion.

Will they be called to testify? Will their immunity deals still be valid?

[RandomGuy]

RG more interested in hoping Trump has more rough patches than to hope for smooth sailing for America. Seems pretty typical of partisians like you, bou, Chris, etc......

Trump is a direct, existential threat to the country. The only way to mitigate the damage being done to the country is to paralyze his administration as much as possible.

The war was declared on norms and people that didn't vote for him a while back.

If you don't like us fighting back... I do not care. It needs to happen.

[Pavlov]

You are going to have to start answering questions if you'd like to continue the discussion.

Will they be called to testify? Will their immunity deals still be valid?I don't know and I don't know.

Since you're harping on the immunity, what crimes are you saying they committed?

[TSA]

I don't know and I don't know.

Since you're harping on the immunity, what crimes are you saying they committed?

broken.fucking.record.

[RandomGuy]

broken.fucking.record.

"someone asked me a question that I can't answer. :cry"

[Pavlov]

broken.fucking.record.And TSA's innuendo machine breaks down once more.

lol

[TSA]

And TSA's innuendo machine breaks down once more.

lol

I told you I'm not accusing them of anything. You proceed to ask what crimes I'm saying they committed. You're a broken fucking record.

[Pavlov]

I told you I'm not accusing them of anything. You proceed to ask what crimes I'm saying they committed. You're a broken fucking record.So if you're not accusing them of anything, why do you keep bringing them up other than repeating innuendo?

[TSA]

So if you're not accusing them of anything, why do you keep bringing them up other than repeating innuendo?

You are in a thread discussing a lawsuit dealing with the DNC hack and the people I am bringing up will more than likely be called on to testify by the defendants.

[Pavlov]

You are in a thread discussing a lawsuit dealing with the DNC hack and the people I am bringing up will more than likely be called on to testify by the defendants.And?

What are you saying will happen, TSA?

[TSA]

And?

What are you saying will happen, TSA?

Are you incapable of discussing a topic without demanding a prediction?

[AaronY]

Is this from the onion? Its that stupid.
It is very embarrassing tbh

[TSA]

Trump Campaign Responds to Frivolous DNC Lawsuit

NEW YORK, NY – Today, the Democratic National Committee filed a wide-ranging, partisan civil lawsuit in federal court against the Trump Campaign, WikiLeaks, and the Russian Government. In response, Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. notes that this frivolous lawsuit is a last-ditch effort to substantiate the baseless Russian collusion allegations by a nearly-bankrupt Democratic Party still trying to counter the will of the people in the 2016 presidential election. This civil lawsuit is completely without merit and will be dismissed in due time.

“This is a sham lawsuit about a bogus Russian collusion claim filed by a desperate, dysfunctional, and nearly insolvent Democratic Party,” said Brad Parscale, Campaign Manager of Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. “With the Democrats’ conspiracy theories against the President’s campaign evaporating as quickly as the failing DNC’s fundraising, they’ve sunk to a new low to raise money, especially among small donors who have abandoned them. There is a great deal the American public wants to know about the corruption of the Democrats, their collusion to influence the 2016 presidential election, and their role in prompting a scam investigation of the Trump Campaign. While this lawsuit is frivolous and will be dismissed, if the case goes forward, the DNC has created an opportunity for us to take aggressive discovery into their claims of ‘damages’ and uncover their acts of corruption for the American people,” he concluded.

If this lawsuit proceeds, the Trump Campaign will be prepared to leverage the discovery process and explore the DNC’s now-secret records about the actual corruption they perpetrated to influence the outcome of the 2016 presidential election. Everything will be on the table, including:

-How the DNC contributed to the fake dossier, using Fusion GPS along with the Clinton Campaign as the basis for the launch of a phony investigation.

-Why the FBI was never allowed access to the DNC servers in the course of their investigation into the Clinton e-mail scandal.

-How the DNC conspired to hand Hillary Clinton the nomination over Bernie Sanders.

-How officials at the highest levels of the DNC colluded with the news media to influence the outcome of the DNC nomination.

-Management decisions by Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Donna Brazile, Tom Perez, and John Podesta; their e-mails, personnel decisions, budgets, opposition research, and more.

https://www.donaldjtrump.com/media/trump-campaign-responds-to-frivolous-dnc-lawsuit/

:rollin

[Pavlov]

Are you incapable of discussing a topic without demanding a prediction?Just testing out the TSA faux indignation machine.

[Pavlov]

Trump Campaign Responds to Frivolous DNC Lawsuit

NEW YORK, NY – Today, the Democratic National Committee filed a wide-ranging, partisan civil lawsuit in federal court against the Trump Campaign, WikiLeaks, and the Russian Government. In response, Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. notes that this frivolous lawsuit is a last-ditch effort to substantiate the baseless Russian collusion allegations by a nearly-bankrupt Democratic Party still trying to counter the will of the people in the 2016 presidential election. This civil lawsuit is completely without merit and will be dismissed in due time.

“This is a sham lawsuit about a bogus Russian collusion claim filed by a desperate, dysfunctional, and nearly insolvent Democratic Party,” said Brad Parscale, Campaign Manager of Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. “With the Democrats’ conspiracy theories against the President’s campaign evaporating as quickly as the failing DNC’s fundraising, they’ve sunk to a new low to raise money, especially among small donors who have abandoned them. There is a great deal the American public wants to know about the corruption of the Democrats, their collusion to influence the 2016 presidential election, and their role in prompting a scam investigation of the Trump Campaign. While this lawsuit is frivolous and will be dismissed, if the case goes forward, the DNC has created an opportunity for us to take aggressive discovery into their claims of ‘damages’ and uncover their acts of corruption for the American people,” he concluded.

If this lawsuit proceeds, the Trump Campaign will be prepared to leverage the discovery process and explore the DNC’s now-secret records about the actual corruption they perpetrated to influence the outcome of the 2016 presidential election. Everything will be on the table, including:

-How the DNC contributed to the fake dossier, using Fusion GPS along with the Clinton Campaign as the basis for the launch of a phony investigation.

-Why the FBI was never allowed access to the DNC servers in the course of their investigation into the Clinton e-mail scandal.

-How the DNC conspired to hand Hillary Clinton the nomination over Bernie Sanders.

-How officials at the highest levels of the DNC colluded with the news media to influence the outcome of the DNC nomination.

-Management decisions by Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Donna Brazile, Tom Perez, and John Podesta; their e-mails, personnel decisions, budgets, opposition research, and more.

https://www.donaldjtrump.com/media/trump-campaign-responds-to-frivolous-dnc-lawsuit/

:rollinI figure the plaintiffs' lawyers have taken this into consideration, but lol talking points.

[Spurminator]

TSA literally posting trump.com links now.

[spurraider21]

TSA literally posting trump.com links now.
imagine he actually liked trump

[Spurminator]

Also getting into court, the DNC servers, Crowdstrike, Cheryl Mills, Paul Combetta, Brian Pagliano, Heather Samuelson, John Bentel...need I go on? Terrible idea for Democrats :rollin

Surely this will be a surprise to the DNC legal team bringing the suit. What a shock they're in for when they realize this.

[Pavlov]

TSA literally posting trump.com links now.Disappointed there was no mention of Seth Rich by team Trump.

[hater]

This is gone get good :lmao

Waserman shits! Bring out waserman shits!

:lmao

Pls televise this shit

[Pavlov]

Trump Campaign Responds to Frivolous DNC Lawsuit

NEW YORK, NY – Today, the Democratic National Committee filed a wide-ranging, partisan civil lawsuit in federal court against the Trump Campaign, WikiLeaks, and the Russian Government. In response, Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. notes that this frivolous lawsuit is a last-ditch effort to substantiate the baseless Russian collusion allegations by a nearly-bankrupt Democratic Party still trying to counter the will of the people in the 2016 presidential election. This civil lawsuit is completely without merit and will be dismissed in due time.

“This is a sham lawsuit about a bogus Russian collusion claim filed by a desperate, dysfunctional, and nearly insolvent Democratic Party,” said Brad Parscale, Campaign Manager of Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. “With the Democrats’ conspiracy theories against the President’s campaign evaporating as quickly as the failing DNC’s fundraising, they’ve sunk to a new low to raise money, especially among small donors who have abandoned them. There is a great deal the American public wants to know about the corruption of the Democrats, their collusion to influence the 2016 presidential election, and their role in prompting a scam investigation of the Trump Campaign. While this lawsuit is frivolous and will be dismissed, if the case goes forward, the DNC has created an opportunity for us to take aggressive discovery into their claims of ‘damages’ and uncover their acts of corruption for the American people,” he concluded.

If this lawsuit proceeds, the Trump Campaign will be prepared to leverage the discovery process and explore the DNC’s now-secret records about the actual corruption they perpetrated to influence the outcome of the 2016 presidential election. Everything will be on the table, including:

-How the DNC contributed to the fake dossier, using Fusion GPS along with the Clinton Campaign as the basis for the launch of a phony investigation.

-Why the FBI was never allowed access to the DNC servers in the course of their investigation into the Clinton e-mail scandal.

-How the DNC conspired to hand Hillary Clinton the nomination over Bernie Sanders.

-How officials at the highest levels of the DNC colluded with the news media to influence the outcome of the DNC nomination.

-Management decisions by Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Donna Brazile, Tom Perez, and John Podesta; their e-mails, personnel decisions, budgets, opposition research, and more.

https://www.donaldjtrump.com/media/trump-campaign-responds-to-frivolous-dnc-lawsuit/

:rollinThat's like nine *ding*s in one letter.

Props.

[RandomGuy]

Is this from the onion? Its that stupid.

How the elephant got its Trump
The president’s takeover of his party is near complete
It will not easily be undone

https://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21740748-it-will-not-easily-be-undone-presidents-takeover-his-party-near-complete

[Spurminator]

What a silly insignificant move by the DNC which lead to an immediate 8-paragraph statement by the Office of the President.

[hater]

Surely this will be a surprise to the DNC legal team bringing the suit. What a shock they're in for when they realize this.

Probably as much a shock as they had when they found out their IT staffers were comminting bank fraud and stealing DNC equipment tbqh :lmao

[DarrinS]

Is this from the onion? Its that stupid.

No, but this is

:lol


987399133794271236

[hater]

No, but this is

:lol


987399133794271236

:lmao

This will be the gift that keeps o giving for the next 8 9 months

:lmao

[hater]

Omg :lmao

987413406192996352


Dont they have any PR ppl???

[Chris]

Gorka

[Spurminator]

Omg :lmao

987413406192996352


Dont they have any PR ppl???

He seems angry.

[Pavlov]

He seems angry.Even Trump is tweeting about it.

They're shook.

[Spurminator]

What an embarrassing self own by the Democrats that has suddenly led everyone involved in the Trump campaign to release angry statements.

[hater]

What an embarrassing self own by the Democrats that has suddenly led everyone involved in the Trump campaign to release angry statements.

Yeah mocking is the new angry :lmao

[hater]

987473342994272257

[hater]

987463340120305666

[Chris]

Debbie Wassershits :lol


987470932989050881

[hater]

987445860626821120

[hater]

:lmao omg

987463420831133698

[hater]

Even Gloria going in RAW :lmao

987423762944614400

[hater]

987375806996451328

[spurraider21]

lol rex tillersom

[Spurminator]

Yeah mocking is the new angry :lmao

There's not a shred of mockery in the Gorka or Trump statements. 100% indignation. They maaaad

[FuzzyLumpkins]

A lot of people are reminding me of darrin, chris, tsa, and the conspiratard club in the opening of the Mueller investigation.

If it is meritless then it will get shut down quickly but we shall see.

[DarrinS]

A lot of people are reminding me of darrin, chris, tsa, and the conspiratard club in the opening of the Mueller investigation.

If it is meritless then it will get shut down quickly but we shall see.



987397303702048768

[FuzzyLumpkins]

987397303702048768

So? You cannot even speak intelligently as to what case they are making.

[DarrinS]

So? You cannot even speak intelligently as to what case they are making.

You are right about that. :lmao

[FuzzyLumpkins]

You are right about that. :lmao

You would take pride in ignorance.

[TSA]

‘Who the hell is Wendy?’: Internet unloads on Trump after he attacks the wrong Wasserman Schultz
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/04/hell-wendy-internet-unloads-trump-attacks-wrong-wasserman-schultz/

Whether on accident or on purpose Trump just got millions of new people looking into the story of Wasserman Schultz and her arrested Pakistani IT aide.

[TSA]

A lot of people are reminding me of darrin, chris, tsa, and the conspiratard club in the opening of the Mueller investigation.

If it is meritless then it will get shut down quickly but we shall see.

The Mueller investigation is further away from Trump/Russia election collusion than when it started :rollin

[hater]

987484542352048128

[hater]

987484726310133760

[hater]

987484889049116672

[hater]

987488001541464064

[Chris]

987484889049116672

Did she died?

[Mikeanaro]

987484726310133760
:lmao

[sickdsm]

Trump is a direct, existential threat to the country. The only way to mitigate the damage being done to the country is to paralyze his administration as much as possible.

The war was declared on norms and people that didn't vote for him a while back.

If you don't like us fighting back... I do not care. It needs to happen.

There's a ying to every yang. Why do you think Trump got elected? Because there is a lot of people that have been forgotten. Not sure what norms are but there is a lot of common hard working people that have been getting the shaft along time prior. They voted for a change up. I think you started a thread about a socialist while there's also a thread about the DNC suing Trump when they sabatoged their own change up candidate. The direct existential threat to this country would be vote fraud, don't you think? Because if we can't legitimately vote a guy like Bernie Sanders in, what use is anything else? Had people stood up to the farce that was the DNC primary, we'd be bitching about President Sanders today. Yet here you are complaining about the starting QB because the there star player got caught with steroids. You should be FURIOUS with the outcome within the DNC party.

[Mikeanaro]

So they needed 2 years to sue, also why wikileaks?
It used to be a liberal river of knowledge when it started during the W era, but now HERTS MAH FEELEENGS?

[Chris]

987475216489050112

[hater]

Gawd damn Trump went HAM

987489037656064000

[SnakeBoy]

Trump is a direct, existential threat to the country. The only way to mitigate the damage being done to the country is to paralyze his administration as much as possible.

The war was declared on norms and people that didn't vote for him a while back.

If you don't like us fighting back... I do not care. It needs to happen.

I know this is pointless but....

How is Trump is a direct, existential threat to the country?

[spurraider21]

Disappointed there was no mention of Seth Rich by team Trump.


987473342994272257


Gawd damn Trump went HAM

987489037656064000

[hater]

Dissapointed no more :lmao

[Chris]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DNw7smqWkAEHZyz?format=jpg&name=medium

[Pavlov]

‘Who the hell is Wendy?’: Internet unloads on Trump after he attacks the wrong Wasserman Schultz
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/04/hell-wendy-internet-unloads-trump-attacks-wrong-wasserman-schultz/

Whether on accident or on purpose Trump just got millions of new people looking into the story of Wasserman Schultz and her arrested Pakistani IT aide.
Do you think he deliberately tweeted Wendy?

Yes or no.

[hater]

:lmao wikileaks going balls deep :lol

Comment on DNC lawsuit: "DNC is suing WikiLeaks for spectacularly revealing that the DNC rigged its primaries on behalf of Hillary Clinton. The DNC was so corrupt that five of its officers, including its president, were forced to resign."

[Pavlov]

Dissapointed no more :lmao
Not actually Team Trump.

[hater]

:lmao sorry to hijack this niggas but I came across this :lmao

987351907000832001

[Mikeanaro]

Drugs are bad.

[TSA]

Do you think he deliberately tweeted Wendy?

Yes or no.

I don’t know. Whether on accident or on purpose Trump just got millions of new people looking into the story of Wasserman Schultz and her arrested Pakistani IT aide.

[Spurminator]

I don’t know. Whether on accident or on purpose Trump just got millions of new people looking into the story of Wasserman Schultz and her arrested Pakistani IT aide.

987492008947314690

[TSA]

987492008947314690

Wendy Wasserman Schultz is trending on Twitter :lmao

https://trends24.in/united-states/

I underestimated when I said millions of new people are looking into the Awan scandal

[hater]

:lmao

[Spurminator]

Wendy Wasserman Schultz is trending on Twitter :lmao

https://trends24.in/united-states/

I underestimated when I said millions of new people are looking into the Awan scandal

Except they're not. You live in a bubble. In the real world, no one cares.

[Mikeanaro]

Except they're not. You live in a bubble. In the real world, no one cares.
Says who?

[Spurminator]

Says who?

Says me.

[Mikeanaro]

Says me.
Then you live in a bubble, if no one cared about corruption Hillary would be the POTUS.
Lots of people from all over the world follow what happens in US, to protect investments be informed or for political climate researches.

[TSA]

Except they're not. You live in a bubble. In the real world, no one cares.

Yet here you are, searching for and posting tweets about Wendy Wasserman Schultz.

[Spurminator]

Then you live in a bubble, if no one cared about corruption Hillary would be the POTUS.
Lots of people from all over the world follow what happens in US, to protect investments be informed or for political climate researches.

No one is talking about Awan on Twitter except people who are talking about how everyone is now talking about Awan.

Everyone else is just making fun of the President's typo. And far more people than that are just talking about basketball.

[hater]

Except they're not. You live in a bubble. In the real world, no one cares.

:lmao not knowing what trending on twitter means

[Spurminator]

Yet here you are, searching for and posting tweets about Wendy Wasserman Schultz.

That tweet was retweeted by someone I follow. When I clicked the WWS trend (#14 for me), the above^ was what I saw. Probably most of the people you get your marching orders from. Seemed Russian.

[Spurminator]

:lmao not knowing what trending on twitter means

Twitter trends are frequently driven by heavy activity among a niche group of people.

[hater]

Twitter trends are frequently driven by heavy activity among a niche group of people.

So somebody cares right?

[Spurminator]

So somebody cares right?

Is that your argument? A literal interpretation of "nobody cares"?

Strong.

(FYI it's no longer trending. Guess everyone's done looking into the Awan controversy. I'm sure it will be recapped on all of the morning news programs.)

[Pavlov]

I don’t know. Whether on accident or on purpose Trump just got millions of new people looking into the story of Wasserman Schultz and her arrested Pakistani IT aide.
Just testing out the TSA "I don't know" bot function.

[Spurtacular]

Pavlov

:lol at you trying to get lost in the weeds with TSA. Nothing to say about your fag hag's party's publicity stunt. :lol

[Expert]

Trump is a direct, existential threat to the country. The only way to mitigate the damage being done to the country is to paralyze his administration as much as possible.

The war was declared on norms and people that didn't vote for him a while back.

If you don't like us fighting back... I do not care. It needs to happen.
:lmao

Shit link repository 2.0 at Spurstalk.com/political forum is really being the Patrick Henry of your time, dipshit.

[Expert]

I don't know and I don't know.

Since you're harping on the immunity, what crimes are you saying they committed?


Just testing out the TSA "I don't know" bot function.

[Pavlov]

Pavlov

:lol at you trying to get lost in the weeds with TSA. Nothing to say about your fag hag's party's publicity stunt. :lolI have already said it has all of you freaking out one way or another.

lol

[Pavlov]

chirpIt's a callback, dumbass.

[hater]

Is that your argument? A literal interpretation of "nobody cares"?

Strong.

(FYI it's no longer trending. Guess everyone's done looking into the Awan controversy. I'm sure it will be recapped on all of the morning news programs.)

Forgive me for literally interpreting what you wrote!! :lmao

[hater]

“Where evidence matters”

Except there is no evidence :lmao

And if there is they will have to present their servers and put their Pakistani IT staff in front of the judge :lmao

[Spurtacular]

I have already said it has all of you freaking out one way or another.

lol

:lol Passing the buck; pathetic. Par.

[Chris]

Treasure trove!


987766033862873091

[Pavlov]

:lol Passing the buck; pathetic. Par.Passing the buck to whom?

Myself?

lol

[Spurtacular]

Passing the buck to whom?

Myself?

lol

From the perpetrators of your publicity stunt. That wasn't a hard one. But #SpecialNeeds and all.

[Pavlov]

From the perpetrators of your publicity stunt. That wasn't a hard one. But #SpecialNeeds and all.:lmao perpetrators.

It could be a publicity stunt. I don't know the legal stuff involved. I do know it triggered you and still is triggering you. That wasn't a hard one.

[Spurtacular]

:lmao perpetrators.

It could be a publicity stunt. I don't know the legal stuff involved. I do know it triggered you and still is triggering you. That wasn't a hard one.

I agree; my sense of bull shit has been triggered. And :lol at you being a passive Mary about it the "legal stuff."

[Pavlov]

I agree; my sense of bull shit has been triggered. And :lol at you being a passive Mary about it the "legal stuff."Now you're triggered by my not having a law degree.

[Spurtacular]

Now you're triggered by my not having a law degree.

:lol You're reaching more than Blake and Reck at a gay orgy.

[Pavlov]

:lol You're reaching more than Blake and Reck at a gay orgy.:lol broadcasting your sexual fantasies about men again and calling them to you.

[Spurtacular]

:lol broadcasting your sexual fantasies about men again and calling them to you.

Bottom line: You're still giving shelter to your Democrats and their shameless lawsuit.

[Pavlov]

Bottom line: You're still giving shelter to your Democrats and their shameless lawsuit.Bottom line: You just posted your sexual fantasy about two men here and went out of your way to call their attention to your sexual fantasy about them.

[DMC]

Is that your argument? A literal interpretation of "nobody cares"?

Strong.

(FYI it's no longer trending. Guess everyone's done looking into the Awan controversy. I'm sure it will be recapped on all of the morning news programs.)

:lmao

"No one cares"

*gets shown trending twitter

":rolleyes semantics"

The left here can say anything at any time, and when proven wrong they fall back on "that's just semantics"

2+2=5 else semantics

[Spurtacular]

:lmao

"No one cares"

*gets shown trending twitter

":rolleyes semantics"

The left here can say anything at any time, and when proven wrong they fall back on "that's just semantics"

2+2=5 else semantics

They'll fall back on any piddly excuse. Nobody has put forth anything to validate this sad lawsuit.

[Spurminator]

:lmao

"No one cares"

*gets shown trending twitter

":rolleyes semantics"

The left here can say anything at any time, and when proven wrong they fall back on "that's just semantics"

2+2=5 else semantics

Oh boy, more of this! You're really a one-note motherfucker now arencha?

Why don't you at least get the order of the conversation correct, and the actual quote, before you're going to be a little bitch about misquotes and intent.

[Spurtacular]

Oh boy, more of this! You're really a one-note motherfucker now arencha?

:lol First time I ever seen him make that argument.
:lol You're out of your league, bro.

[Spurminator]

:lol First time I ever seen him make that argument.
:lol You're out of your league, bro.

:lol basement cheering section

[Spurtacular]

Bottom line: You just posted your sexual fantasy about two men here and went out of your way to call their attention to your sexual fantasy about them.

I know you want to stay in the weeds, but I'll throw you a bone. If I were gay, I sure as fuck wouldn't be into those rest stop homos. Now you can get back to pretending the Democrats aren't doing propaganda.

[Spurtacular]

:lol basement cheering section

Tbh, it's y'er guys's spat, and I don't really want to jump in. But fuck if you're gonna be that pathetic, then someone should put you out of your misery, honestly.

[Pavlov]

I know you want to stay in the weeds, but I'll throw you a bone. If I were gay, I sure as fuck wouldn't be into those rest stop homos. Now you can get back to pretending the Democrats aren't doing propaganda.:lol It's your post. Now you instantly want to run away from it.

[Chris]

987783643442663424

[Spurtacular]

:lol It's your post. Now you instantly want to run away from it.

:lol Incoherent babbling.
:lol Taking another L.

[Pavlov]

987783643442663424The backpage seizure has been all over the news.

If you have a new conspiracy theory, post it.

[Pavlov]

:lol Incoherent babbling.
:lol Taking another L.What part of "It's your post" did you not understand?

[Spurtacular]

987783643442663424


:cry But muh fag hag isn't a criminal :cry

:lmao

[Spurtacular]

What part of "It's your post" did you not understand?

You made no clear accusation. I get it; #SpecialNeeds and L's in bulk is your thing. :lmao

[Pavlov]

:lmao:lol quote change white flag.


You made no clear accusation. I get it; #SpecialNeeds and L's in bulk is your thing. :lmaoI said you posted your sexual fantasy about two male posters and went out of your way to contact both of them so they could see it using the mention function.

[Chris]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DbU547_U8AAsA2F?format=jpg&name=large

[Pavlov]

:lol Garrison is triggered too.

[Spurtacular]

I said you posted your sexual fantasy about two male posters and went out of your way to contact both of them so they could see it using the mention function.

I gave them the courtesy of joking about them to their proverbial faces. Apparently that's a problem for you.

[koriwhat]

hahaha let the backfire commence! fuck the dnc and all involved.

[Pavlov]

I gave them the courtesy of joking about them to their proverbial faces. Apparently that's a problem for you.I said you posted your sexual fantasy about two male posters and went out of your way to contact both of them so they could see it using the mention function. Apparently you have a problem when that's pointed out to you.

[Spurtacular]

I said you posted your sexual fantasy about two male posters and went out of your way to contact both of them so they could see it using the mention function. Apparently you have a problem when that's pointed out to you.

:lol Mr. non-legal expert loves him some conjecture.
:lol L's in bulk.

[Pavlov]

:lol Mr. non-legal expert loves him some conjecture.
:lol L's in bulk.What conjecture? It's clearly what you did.

[Spurtacular]

What conjecture? It's clearly what you did.

Asking lame questions ain't gonna erase the L's, bro.

[Pavlov]

Asking lame questions ain't gonna erase the L's, bro.Just say you can't answer the question.

[Spurtacular]

Just say you can't answer the question.

Do you need me to cater to your #SpecialNeeds?

[Pavlov]

Do you need me to cater to your #SpecialNeeds?Just say you can't answer the question.

It's OK.

[Spurtacular]

Just say you can't answer the question.

It's OK.

:lol More conjecture (somewhat ironically).
:lol L's in bulk.

[Pavlov]

:lol More conjecture (somewhat ironically).
:lol L's in bulk.You're the one not answering the question.

[Spurtacular]

You're the one not answering the question.

Good deduction, Sherlock.

Do you know why your conjecture is only "somewhat" ironic? Did you pick up on that one too, Sherlock?

[Pavlov]

Good deduction, Sherlock.

Do you know why your conjecture is only "somewhat" ironic? Did you pick up on that one too, Sherlock?There is no conjecture. You posted your sexual fantasy about two male posters and went out of your way to contact both of them so they could see it using the mention function.

[Spurtacular]

There is no conjecture. You posted your sexual fantasy about two male posters and went out of your way to contact both of them so they could see it using the mention function.

:lol So, you're showing us that you truly are not a legal expert let alone even remotely competent.
:lol L's in bulk.

[Pavlov]

:lol So, you're showing us that you truly are not a legal expert let alone even remotely competent.
:lol L's in bulk.Your sexual fantasies you posted here aren't a legal issue.

Not yet, anyway.

[Spurtacular]

Your sexual fantasies you posted here aren't a legal issue.

Not yet, anyway.

You hold tight to your L's bro. They're your babies. :lmao

[sickdsm]

This.

I know it’s shocking that these fucking mongoloids don’t understand nuance, as the people that think for them don’t work in that world since they don’t have to because they all have ducks iq or lower.
Another poster that would have been happier with WW3 than having a non aggressive North Korea.

There better be some results in all the political drama the DS have created THIS YEAR with the Trump administration, the general public is getting rather used to the fighting and they will be well sick of it by then otherwise.

It would make Obama's adminstration look like he had a cakewalk with the Rs bullshit otherwise.

[Pavlov]

You hold tight to your L's bro. They're your babies. :lmao:lol declaring victory is very important to you.

[baseline bum]

There better be some results in all the political drama the DS have created THIS YEAR with the Trump administration, the general public is getting rather used to the fighting and they will be well sick of it by then otherwise.

It would make Obama's adminstration look like he had a cakewalk with the Rs bullshit otherwise.

Maybe they'll impeach your boy over a blowjob and decide he can't make nominations to the Supreme Court.

[Spurtacular]

:lol declaring victory is very important to you.

:lol You subsist on conjecture (once again).

[hater]

987454233862705152

[hater]

987575762562629632

[Spurtacular]

987470932989050881

:lmao

[koriwhat]

987470932989050881

:lmao

:tu

[Spurtacular]

:tu

Once again, Trump playing 3-D chess while the Democrats are playing checkers.

[hater]

:lmao omg this is gona be fun

987811432795463680

[hater]

987770682619678721

[SnakeBoy]

Once again, Trump playing 3-D chess while the Democrats are playing checkers.

DNC isn't playing checkers. They're just broke and desperate for money.

[CosmicCowboy]

They will just wipe those DNC servers with a cloth.

[DMC]

Oh boy, more of this! You're really a one-note motherfucker now arencha?

Why don't you at least get the order of the conversation correct, and the actual quote, before you're going to be a little bitch about misquotes and intent.

Paraphrasing bad now

[hater]

They will just wipe those DNC servers with a cloth.

Yeah but then their lawsuit is gone like with a cloth :lmao

[Spurminator]

Paraphrasing bad now

If you're the person who's always whining about paraphrasing, yeah. :lol Not that you've ever been concerned about consistency.

[lefty]

This shit show is straight out of the Onion

[DMC]

If you're the person who's always whining about paraphrasing, yeah. :lol Not that you've ever been concerned about consistency.

:lmao

[Chris]

:lmao omg this is gona be fun

987811432795463680

Glad you saw that. Clinton slurper was scared to answer questions and acted like he couldn't hear Bongino. What a faggot :lol

[sickdsm]

Maybe they'll impeach your boy over a blowjob and decide he can't make nominations to the Supreme Court.

The butthurt between liberals and conservatives is like warriors and rockets fans forgetting there are other teams out there.

Anyone stupid enough to think I'm a Trump fanboy clearly wasn't sharp enough to see through the joke that has become the dnc

[baseline bum]

The butthurt between liberals and conservatives is like warriors and rockets fans forgetting there are other teams out there.

Anyone stupid enough to think I'm a Trump fanboy clearly wasn't sharp enough to see through the joke that has become the dnc

Right, you don't like Trump just like DarrinS doesn't.

[hater]

OPCW statement saying it was UN and not Russia who decided to withdraw team from Douma the first couple of tries.

Disproving the fake news that Russia was preventing them from entering

On 16 April, we received confirmation from the National Authority of the Syrian Arab Republic that, under agreements reached to allow the evacuation of the population in Ghouta, the Syrian military were unable to enter Douma. The security for the sites where the FFM plans to deploy was under the control of the Russian Military Police. The United Nations Department of Safety and Security (UNDSS) has made the necessary arrangements with the Syrian authorities to escort the team to a certain point and then for the escort to be taken over by the Russian Military Police. However, the UNDSS preferred to first conduct a reconnaissance visit to the sites, which took place yesterday. FFM team members did not participate in this visit.

On arrival at Site 1, a large crowd gathered and the advice provided by the UNDSS was that the reconnaissance team should withdraw. At Site 2, the team came under small arms fire and an explosive was detonated. The reconnaissance team returned to Damascus.

[DarrinS]

Right, you don't like Trump just like DarrinS doesn't.

Just because Trump is a sleazy loudmouth doesn’t mean I can’t mock muhRussia hysteria and this retarded DNC lawsuit.

[Pavlov]

Just because Trump is a sleazy loudmouth doesn’t mean I can’t mock muhRussia hysteria and this retarded DNC lawsuit.

You like and support Trump.

[baseline bum]

Just because Trump is a sleazy loudmouth doesn’t mean I can’t mock muhRussia hysteria and this retarded DNC lawsuit.

And defend him at every turn. Imagine if you, sickdsm, and snakeboy actually liked Trump.

[DarrinS]

And defend him at every turn. Imagine if you, sickdsm, and snakeboy actually liked Trump.

Only against Russia collusion hysteria. I don’t like him, but I like that he drives the left batshit. :lol

[Pavlov]

Only against Russia collusion hysteria. I don’t like him, but I like that he drives the left batshit. :lolWhich Trump policies and actions do you oppose?

[baseline bum]

Only against Russia collusion hysteria. I don’t like him, but I like that he drives the left batshit. :lol

LOL calling it hysteria when the leaders of his campaign were meeting with a promised Russian government lawyer to get assistance from Russia.

:lol But Uday said it was just about adoptions :lol

Didn't you throw a fit about Obama and light bulbs back in the day?

[Spurminator]

Just because Trump is a sleazy loudmouth doesn’t mean I can’t mock muhRussia hysteria and this retarded DNC lawsuit.

The frequency of your "mockery" reads more like you're trying to convince yourself it's hysteria.

[hater]

Only against Russia collusion hysteria. I don’t like him, but I like that he drives the left batshit. :lol

:lmao :tu

[hater]

The frequency of your "mockery" reads more like you're trying to convince yourself it's hysteria.

“nodoby cares” right?

[hater]

LOL calling it hysteria when the leaders of his campaign were meeting with a promised Russian government lawyer to get assistance from Russia.

:lol But Uday said it was just about adoptions :lol

Didn't you throw a fit about Obama and light bulbs back in the day?

Christopher Stele whom Hillary paid also met with Russians for assistance tbqh

Both parties were trying to smear each other and both talked to Russians

Lets be fair here

[hater]

Lets also be fair both parties also talked with French, German, Brits and Israelis for assistance smearing the opponent

Wake the fuck up and stop pretending it was only Russians andnonly Trump :cry

Yall sound stupid as hell and like you were born yeaterday

[Spurminator]

“nodoby cares” right?

Looks like I was right.

[DarrinS]

The frequency of your "mockery" reads more like you're trying to convince yourself it's hysteria.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_UuQ8lDxKE

[hater]

Looks like I was right.

:lol not knowing what trending on twitter means

[hater]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_UuQ8lDxKE

:lmao

[Pavlov]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_UuQ8lDxKE

What Trump policies and actions do you oppose?

[Pavlov]

Christopher Stele whom Hillary paid also met with Russians for assistance tbqh

Both parties were trying to smear each other and both talked to Russians

Lets be fair here
lol not knowing the difference

[boutons_deux]

lol not knowing the difference

Dems colluded with Russians?

[Spurminator]

:lol not knowing what trending on twitter means

Poster A: "Waffle House" is trending. Now everyone will be talking about the food poisoning incident at the Dallas location in 2015.
Poster B: No one cares. They're talking about the shooting that happened yesterday.
Poster C (Idiot): Obviously someone cares because it's trending on Twitter.

We don't disagree that people were talking about Wendy Wasserman Schultz. We disagree on why they were talking about her.

I haven't seen an uptick in Awan scandal discussion like you and TSA were predicting, have you?

[DarrinS]

What Trump policies and actions do you oppose?

Border wall, tariffs, and he should get off Twitter. The way he speaks is super cringey, too, but he’s too old to change that.

[sickdsm]

Right, you don't like Trump just like DarrinS doesn't.
I just trashed the Republicans in the very post you replied to for all the shit that they put Obama through. But you seem to imply just because I think Hillary was a bigger piece of shit that I'm suddenly a huge Trump fan.


I'm going to throw in the off chance that you may be drunk, not just stupid.

[DarrinS]

By the way, the Democrats and the MSM (one and the same) actively promoted Trump during the primaries. They got the Republican nominee they wanted because Shill (*ding) was supposed to slam dunk his dumb ass. :lol

[baseline bum]

I just trashed the Republicans in the very post you replied to for all the shit that they put Obama through. But you seem to imply just because I think Hillary was a bigger piece of shit that I'm suddenly a huge Trump fan.


I'm going to throw in the off chance that you may be drunk, not just stupid.

LOL trashing the Republicans by saying what the Democrats are doing to poor Trump is worse (even though Mueller, Comey, Rosenstein are all GOP). Hopefully the Democrats can find some way to take the senate so they can deny your boy the ability to nominate SC judges.

[baseline bum]

By the way, the Democrats and the MSM (one and the same) actively promoted Trump during the primaries. They got the Republican nominee they wanted because Shill (*ding) was supposed to slam dunk his dumb ass. :lol

Clear Channel and Sinclair promoted Trump to help out Hillary too?

[Spurminator]

Conservatives love bragging about how many people consume conservative news (ratings, etc.) but never want to include their channels in "mainstream media."

[Chris]

Conservatives love bragging about how many people consume conservative news (ratings, etc.) but never want to include their channels in "mainstream media."

What channels do Conservatives watch and which ones do they hide?

[Pavlov]

What channels do Conservatives watch and which ones do they hide?No one said they hide channels.

How does one even hide a channel?

[Spurminator]

What channels do Conservatives watch and which ones do they hide?

Fox News is the highest rated cable news network by far, and the #5 news website (ahead of HuffPo, Buzzfeed, USA Today, NBC/CBS.com and plenty of others often described as "MSM.")

Nine of the top 15 syndicated radio programs are conservative programs (Limbaugh, Hannity, Ramsey, Savage, Beck, Levin, Ingraham, Gallagher, Hewitt.)

Conservatives never consider any of these sources "mainstream" despite the fact that they have a significant share of US news consumption.

Mainstream media is polarized, not liberal.

[hater]

Poster A: "Waffle House" is trending. Now everyone will be talking about the food poisoning incident at the Dallas location in 2015.
Poster B: No one cares. They're talking about the shooting that happened yesterday.
Poster C (Idiot): Obviously someone cares because it's trending on Twitter.

We don't disagree that people were talking about Wendy Wasserman Schultz. We disagree on why they were talking about her.

I haven't seen an uptick in Awan scandal discussion like you and TSA were predicting, have you?


:lmao not knowing what trending on twitter means

[Spurminator]

:lmao not knowing what trending on twitter means

0/3

[koriwhat]

The butthurt between liberals and conservatives is like warriors and rockets fans forgetting there are other teams out there.

Anyone stupid enough to think I'm a Trump fanboy clearly wasn't sharp enough to see through the joke that has become the dnc

and that sir is the god honest truth for most of us.

[ElNono]

This has Shillary written all over it, IMO

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Christopher Stele whom Hillary paid also met with Russians for assistance tbqh

Both parties were trying to smear each other and both talked to Russians

Lets be fair here

I like how you make the equivalence of a DNC oppo research subcontractor talking to his informants with the spawn of Trump and senior campaign executives meeting with Russian state agents.

[Chris]

Fox News is the highest rated cable news network by far, and the #5 news website (ahead of HuffPo, Buzzfeed, USA Today, NBC/CBS.com and plenty of others often described as "MSM.")

Nine of the top 15 syndicated radio programs are conservative programs (Limbaugh, Hannity, Ramsey, Savage, Beck, Levin, Ingraham, Gallagher, Hewitt.)

Conservatives never consider any of these sources "mainstream" despite the fact that they have a significant share of US news consumption.

Mainstream media is polarized, not liberal.

So all you've got is Fox? That would be channel not channels. You can move the goalpost to sources if you like and name some mainstream media sources besides Fox. Saavy?

[Pavlov]

So all you've got is Fox? That would be channel not channels. You can move the goalpost to sources if you like and name some mainstream media sources besides Fox. Saavy?Every Sinclair station is on a local channel.

Do you understand how television works?

[Spurminator]

So all you've got is Fox? That would be channel not channels. You can move the goalpost to sources if you like and name some mainstream media sources besides Fox. Saavy?

"Channel" doesn't just apply to TV anymore. This isn't 1985. Catch up.

[Chris]

"Channel" doesn't just apply to TV anymore. This isn't 1985. Catch up.

*white flag

gg no re is thanks

[Spurminator]

*white flag

gg no re is thanks

Good boy, just walk away with your L and add it to the collection.

[Pavlov]

So all you've got is Fox? That would be channel not channels. You can move the goalpost to sources if you like and name some mainstream media sources besides Fox. Saavy?OK, Sinclair controls 611 television channels.

I wouldn't presume every one of them has news, but I'll just settle for the 192 actual TV stations they own and use that number.

Does that work for you?

194 channels?

[sickdsm]

LOL trashing the Republicans by saying what the Democrats are doing to poor Trump is worse (even though Mueller, Comey, Rosenstein are all GOP). Hopefully the Democrats can find some way to take the senate so they can deny your boy the ability to nominate SC judges.

:lol

Still doesn't get it. Your boy?

Poor guy is worried about keeping score. I sure wasn't butt hurt about bin Laden getting taking out under Obama. This buffoon is more concerned about who's the guy hitting corner 3s than if they actually go in. :lol

[Chris]

Bin Laden? That guy we dumped his corpse in the ocean because reasons?

[Mikeanaro]

By the way, the Democrats and the MSM (one and the same) actively promoted Trump during the primaries. They got the Republican nominee they wanted because Shill (*ding) was supposed to slam dunk his dumb ass. :lol
Because according to Wikileaks, Bill Clinton thought Trump was a great opponent but since he was not a politician the strategy was to give him bad publicity, mocking him like a clown to get the win.
And the publicity worked for dumb liberals, they still think the Don is a poor idiot who cant even spell, SAD.

[Mikeanaro]

Bin Laden? That guy we dumped his corpse in the ocean because reasons?
https://memegenerator.net/img/instances/73860248/he-was-masturbating.jpg

[RandomGuy]

The direct existential threat to this country would be vote fraud, don't you think? Because if we can't legitimately vote a guy like Bernie Sanders in, what use is anything else? Had people stood up to the farce that was the DNC primary, we'd be bitching about President Sanders today. Yet here you are complaining about the starting QB because the there star player got caught with steroids. You should be FURIOUS with the outcome within the DNC party.

Vote fraud would have to exist for it to be a threat. Ask Kolbach how that is working for him in court where actual evidence matters. :lol

Saying that Sanders would have won if only the DNC hadn't rigged it against him somehow totally misses the fact that he didn't get as many votes as Hillary. A giant conspiracy of people voting for someone else. :rolleyes

[Winehole23]

By the way, the Democrats and the MSM (one and the same) actively promoted Trump during the primaries. They got the Republican nominee they wanted because Shill (*ding) was supposed to slam dunk his dumb ass. :lolYup

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/02/why-liberals-should-support-a-trump-nomination.html

[Winehole23]

DNC isn't playing checkers. They're just broke and desperate for money.Which makes this lawsuit all the more pathetic. They'll likely lose, presuming the DNC even has standing to sue.