Snopes Exposed as a CIA Operation

[Spurtacular]

what's wrong with that?

Why would any of that reduce my trust on Snopes' content?

So, you're inclined to believe that someone who would lie, cheat, and steal from his company would be an exemplary purveyor of truth?

[ElNono]

So, you're inclined to believe that someone who would lie, cheat, and steal from his company would be an exemplary purveyor of truth?

If the company's product delivers, why would I care if the head honcho is a liar, gay, or whatever? I don't interact with the guy, I interact with the product, and the product is solid.

I mean, Barry was a compulsive liar, but I appreciate they nailed Bin Laden... just like Trump is a compulsive liar, but if he gets the NK deal done, hey, great stuff. They're visible faces of a larger group of people doing good or bad things.

I praised Snopes on their presentation, transparency, and disclosure. Would love to see more of that from the MSM in general. I think that adds value and trust, but then again, I also understand not everyone can do it without jeopardizing their finances.

Still waiting for alleged tilted/biased fact checks... you would think for a front of the CIA spreading misinformation, it would be a quick find, tbh...

[ElNono]

I believe that the CIA is a sanctioned criminal organization. With that, they need to perpetually put forth PR that they and their cohorts are the good guys; and in that vain, damage control that can be funneled into a mainstream capacity is invaluable. I haven't made the claim, but I'd say I believe it's more likely than unlikely that snopes is aiding the CIA.

You trust faith, which I don't, that's certainly a big difference.

[Mikeanaro]

Oh queenie, you don’t know who I support. For all you know I could be a conservative small government type.

But girlfriend your fear is showing again. You know you’re gay. Know it deep down. That’s why you’re so angry isn’t it gay boy?

I hope someday you realize that sucking cock is who you are. A bottom is who you are. You are a flaming homosexual fighting his upbringing. Let it go, your dad may beat the shit out of you, again for being his fag piece of shit son he has to take a rash of shit for from his buddies. but at least you will finally be free to be the flamboyantly gay piece of shit you know you are.

Everyone sees it. Spurty is the same. Probably that kori thing too.

It must be tough to know that someone whose never met you knows your darkest secret, your homosexuality. Spurty has obviously submitted because he knows what he is. You, you gay little scared girl, you know the truth too. You want to let it out, be the flaming faggot you know you are
Sure, a very manly conservative who had enough with people talking about gays lesbians and trannies.

Do yourself a favor and dont kill anyone on your block, squeeze one of your hairy balls and take a nap, or take some pheromone pills, you will have a bigger weenie and bigger tits.
You will be the ultimate freak, then you could be able to play the silence of the lambs.

[Spurtacular]

You trust faith, which I don't, that's certainly a big difference.

I don't know how I am supposed to "trust faith".

[ElNono]

I don't know how I am supposed to "trust faith".

Well, you choose to believe something you have no proof of, and hope it to be true. That's pretty much the definition of faith.

When you say: "I believe that the CIA is a sanctioned criminal organization" you're telling me what you believe, but not what you know. The latter would require you to have some sort of evidence of that to be the case, but if you did, you probably wouldn't be the first one to have such evidence, and there would be no CIA.

In a sense, you rather go with your intuition and form opinion on that vs actually accept that either there's no evidence to support the claim or that the findings are inconclusive, and 'don't know' is a perfectly valid answer.

In reality, everything is a lot simpler. Things either are or are not, and if we didn't find out yet, 'don't know' is a perfectly rational position. This applies to all areas that attempt futurology, including religion, science, sports, etc.

Unless you're doing specific research on the 'don't know' state, it's actually pretty boring, uneventful and not really worth the time subject, IMVHO.

BTW, I'm not going to chastise you for having an opinion, that's perfectly valid, even if I don't share it.

[Mikeanaro]

I will say there girl that you should probably at least begin to educate yourself about life and such before you have your big coming out ceremony. You’re insult game is bad, stupid as fuck.

Now ill I’ll let you get back to making Jamal happy.

Remember puddin. It’s ok to be yourself, which is of course a flaming homosexual. It’s not ok to loathe what you are to the point you have to pretend to hate what you wish you could be in order to make it seem bad.

Everyone else can see it, you’re a faggot.
Typical of a gay freak, got hit in a nerve and cant let it go.
You are the one touched by a anti gay post, not me so good luck with that, ¨conservative manly man¨
:lmao

[pgardn]

BTW, I'm not going to chastise you for having an opinion, that's perfectly valid, even if I don't share it.

We got plenty of posters who can take up the slack.


When one claims superiority in reasoning skills and then chooses to believe the most bizarre explainations to form opinions, yeah, you get called out as an idiot. The lack of self awareness is astounding. The dude actually thinks he is some sort of uniquely elevated debating machine.

My concern is this type possibly represents 1/3 of our voting public. No ability to reasonably look at a situation and discern between possibilities. Some of the shit these cosmo types come up with is nuts. But amusing. I guess...

[ElNono]

We got plenty of posters who can take up the slack.

When one claims superiority in reasoning skills and then chooses to believe the most bizarre explainations to form opinions, yeah, you get called out as an idiot. The lack of self awareness is astounding. The dude actually thinks he is some sort of uniquely elevated debating machine.

My concern is this type possibly represents 1/3 of our voting public. No ability to reasonably look at a situation and discern between possibilities. Some of the shit these cosmo types come up with is nuts. But amusing. I guess...

Honestly, in the mild form, it all comes down to education. And by that I don't mean just picking up a book or two, but also the environment you grew up on, if you were allowed to be intellectually curious from an early age, etc.

Then you have the flat out paranoid types, that's an actual mental condition, which requires professional help and medication.

It can be amusing, but also sad too...

[Chucho]

:lol I didn't even remember which retard did that, tbh. You're just not important like that. And :lol @ you basically exemplifying what you're accusing others of doing.

LOL, yah you do. Everytime after that, when I'd point out any idiocy you produced, you'd say "sandy vagina" or something of the such.
You NEVER forget and beat things to death:

Cuck
Chumpettes (your Fabs levels of sad making up imaginary cliques just because they all agree you're an idiot)
Nother level
An unhealthy obsession with homoertoic fantasies of Reck

That's 99% of your worthless posts here coupled in with new words you just learned how to use incorrectly.

[Pavlov]

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=273643&p=9378571&viewfull=1#post9378571

(from page #1)





I think most viewers can see what's going on here.

http://cryptome.org/2012/07/gent-forum-spies.htm
(excerpts)
----------------------------------------
4) Teamwork. They tend to operate in self-congratulatory and complementary packs or teams. Of course, this can happen naturally in any public forum, but there will likely be an ongoing pattern of frequent exchanges of this sort where professionals are involved.
----------------------------------------
17. Flood the Internet with agents. This is the answer to the question, "What could possibly motivate a person to spend hour upon hour on Internet news groups defending the government and/or the press and harassing genuine critics?" Don t the authorities have defenders enough in all the newspapers, magazines, radio, and television? One would think refusing to print critical letters and screening out serious callers or dumping them from radio talk shows would be control enough, but, obviously, it is not.
----------------------------------------

https://openheartedrebel.com/2012/09/26/disinformation-campaign-exposure-confessions-of-a-paid-disinformation-poster/



There are a lot of paid sophists working this site. One tactic that they use is to try to create the illusion of wide support for a stand on an issue. The proof that the moon missions were faked is so clear that it makes a good objectivity test. Those posters who continuously maintain that they went to the moon know the missions were faked as well as the hoax-believers do. Those posters are obviously being paid to try to keep the public thinking the way the government wants them to think.You try to create the illusion of widespread support for your conspiracy theories.

[Mikeanaro]

Yes you secretly practicing homosexual, it’s obvious you didn’t get affected by being called out for being a closeted faggot, at all.
Because I cant be triggered when someone calls me something I am not, that was not your case.

[koriwhat]

First “triggered “ is only used by little pansy trump retards.

Second. HAHAHA. Of course you’re not gay. You just suck cock for fun? Right

actually triggered was picked up by conservatives as a way to mock little pansy libs because they're always claiming to be triggered by this or that; basically everything triggers them loser ass sad fuck face pos sissys with no souls.

[Spurtacular]

LOL, yah you do. Everytime after that, when I'd point out any idiocy you produced, you'd say "sandy vagina" or something of the such.
You NEVER forget and beat things to death:

Cuck
Chumpettes (your Fabs levels of sad making up imaginary cliques just because they all agree you're an idiot)
Nother level
An unhealthy obsession with homoertoic fantasies of Reck

That's 99% of your worthless posts here coupled in with new words you just learned how to use incorrectly.

Yea, I took note that you had a vaginal affliction if that makes you feel important. But no, I don't dwell on every retarded argument you make.

[spurraider21]

LOL, yah you do. Everytime after that, when I'd point out any idiocy you produced, you'd say "sandy vagina" or something of the such.
You NEVER forget and beat things to death:

Cuck
Chumpettes (your Fabs levels of sad making up imaginary cliques just because they all agree you're an idiot)
Nother level
An unhealthy obsession with homoertoic fantasies of Reck

That's 99% of your worthless posts here coupled in with new words you just learned how to use incorrectly.
its either cuck, tranny, chumpette, nother level, or me poo. now bluepill :lol

riveting stuff

[Mikeanaro]

First “triggered “ is only used by little pansy trump retards.

Second. HAHAHA. Of course you’re not gay. You just suck cock for fun? Right
How is that?
You are the one defending this

http://images.newindianexpress.com/uploads/user/imagelibrary/2017/6/25/original/Gay_pride_parade_EPS_(6).jpeg

[Spurtacular]

its either cuck, tranny, chumpette, nother level, or me poo. now bluepill :lol

riveting stuff

If the kick me sign sticks.

[Mikeanaro]

992861267005231104

[Pavlov]

992861267005231104So she's going to be running Snopes.

Cool.

[Chris]

Left anxiously waiting for their talking points on how Gina Haspel is bad.

[Pavlov]

Left anxiously waiting for their talking points on how Gina Haspel is bad.I'm fine with her. Some have tried to tie her to the CIA torture program but it looks way overblown.

You never heard of her before this.

[ElNono]

CIA good now

[Spurtacular]

I'm fine with her. Some have tried to tie her to the CIA torture program but it looks way overblown.

You never heard of her before this.

What torture program?

[Pavlov]

What torture program?You never heard of that before either.

[Spurtacular]

You never heard of that before either.

Either? What else didn't I hear about in this thread?

So, no torture program?

[Pavlov]

Either? What else didn't I hear about in this thread?Anything about the appointee.


So, no torture program?Yes, there was a torture program you've been completely ignorant about all these years.

[Mikeanaro]

So she's going to be running Snopes.

Cool.
John Brennan was running Snopes, dont make conspiracies.

Obama was running the country, now Trump does, it is the same?

[Pavlov]

John Brennan was running Snopes, dont make conspiracies.:lol


Obama was running the country, now Trump does, it is the same?You tell me -- it's your conspiracy theory.

Who runs Snopes now?

Who ran it before Brennan?

[Chris]

CIA good now

That drain the swamp thingy ;.)

[Pavlov]

That drain the swamp thingy ;.)So Snopes good now?

[Chris]

So Snopes good now?

How long do you think investigations like these typically last?

[Pavlov]

How long do you think investigations like these typically last?There's a government investigation into Snopes?

Link, please.

[Chris]

There's a government investigation into Snopes?

Link, please.

Read the first few sentences of the OP. Try to keep up please.

[Pavlov]

Read the first few sentences of the OP. Try to keep up please.Wayne Madsen isn't the government.

So there is no actual government investigation into Snopes.

Thanks, Chris.

[Chris]

Wayne Madsen isn't the government.

So there is no actual government investigation into Snopes.

Thanks, Chris.

No one said anything about government investigations but you. This is your routine.

[Pavlov]

No one said anything about government investigations but you. This is your routine.That's the only one that would count.

But Trump runs Snopes now anyway according to you, so I don't know why you're making it a big deal.

[Chris]

That's the only one that would count.

But Trump runs Snopes now anyway according to you, so I don't know why you're making it a big deal.

Trump runs the Executive Branch. :tu

[Pavlov]

Trump runs the Executive Branch. :tuWho appoints the director of the CIA, Chris?

[Chris]

Who appoints the director of the CIA, Chris?

Satan

[Pavlov]

SatanI accept your white flag and your trivialization of your devil.

[Spurtacular]

Anything about the appointee.



Nope. Never mentioned it. FAIL.




Yes, there was a torture program you've been completely ignorant about all these years.

There's been many allegations of CIA torture over the years. What "torture program" are you saying is substantiated.

[Pavlov]

Nope. Never mentioned it.Exactly.


There's been many allegations of CIA torture over the years. What "torture program" are you saying is substantiated.The one you never heard of?

Or do you demand to use the snowflake term for it?

Let me know which one.

[Spurtacular]

Exactly.



I never regarded it in any way, shape or form; nor did anyone do likewise with me.

:lol Self-inflicted L's

[Spurtacular]

The one you never heard of?

Or do you demand to use the snowflake term for it?

Let me know which one.

So, to sum up you're accusing the CIA of having a torture program, but you're unable to cite it. FAIL

[Pavlov]

I never regarded it in any way, shape or formYep, none of you knew anything about it.


So, to sum up you're accusing the CIA of having a torture program, but you're unable to cite it. FAILIt's pretty well known tbh -- but some people insist on calling it something other than torture using a snowflake term.

Do you need help Googling it?

Or are you one of the snowflakes?

Let me know.

[Spurtacular]

Yep, none of you knew anything about it.


:lol You're the guy with no arms and legs acting like you got something.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXY9TuuwyL8




It's pretty well known tbh -- but some people insist on calling it something other than torture using a snowflake term.

Do you need help Googling it?

Or are you one of the snowflakes?

Let me know.

:lol at you hedging.
:lol Trying to co-opt snowflake term (still) while not citing the torture.

Name the torture program if you're so sure of yourself.

[Pavlov]

:lol You're the guy with no arms and legs acting like you got something.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXY9TuuwyL8



:lol at you hedging.
:lol Trying to co-opt snowflake term (still) while not citing the torture.

Name the torture program if you're so sure of yourself.It is commonly known as "the CIA torture program" -- Google it.

Go ahead, if you really want to know about it.

Do you?

[spurraider21]

If the kick me sign sticks.
it never does.

it's just your verbal crutch

[Spurtacular]

it never does.

it's just your verbal crutch

I'm sure you really really really want to believe that.

[spurraider21]

I'm sure you really really really want to believe that.
i dont want to believe it. i just have really good reason to believe it

[Spurtacular]

i dont want to believe it. i just have really good reason to believe it

It's called being triggered.

[spurraider21]

It's called being triggered.
i agree. you get triggered then rely on your verbal crutches

[Spurtacular]

i agree. you get triggered then rely on your verbal crutches

I'm sure you really really really want to believe that, too.

[spurraider21]

I'm sure you really really really want to believe that, too.
not really. just based on observation

[Spurtacular]

not really. just based on observation

My observation is you're quite bothered that I regularly call out your gimpy cohorts.

[ElNono]

That drain the swamp thingy ;.)

Any updates on that? :lol

[pgardn]

Any updates on that? :lol

Yes.

Its overflowing. New ecological niches for swamps are being created by orange guy.
Some of his appointees have created a need for massive security firms and new first class lounges in airplanes.
Others are helping the government to help the airline industry by planning their vacations for them. It’s government aiding the private business sector. Amphibians are in bed with Chris. All is well.

[Mikeanaro]

:lol

You tell me -- it's your conspiracy theory.

Who runs Snopes now?

Who ran it before Brennan?
Another Pro Hillary Bozo.

[Mikeanaro]

I get that you look at them and wish you could be the ice cream in their sandwich. But you’ve been told it was wrongly long to be gay like you.

I’m defending you here faggot. You should not be ashamed that you want to be fucked on both ends by them. We all know you had that pic ready because you jerk off to it.
You are defending what you are, Im a big boy and Im against that shit.
So what we are witnessing is a liberal loony trying to twist reality, what you did a couple pages ago will be forever so go shoot those servers or deal with it.

[Chris]

Any updates on that? :lol

Yeah. They're cleaning house.


Did Maddow not tell you?


https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DcZ35wrVMAAHA9d.jpg:large

[Pavlov]

Another Pro Hillary Bozo.And who has run it since Trump has been in office?

[ElNono]

Yeah. They're cleaning house.

Did Maddow not tell you?

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DcZ35wrVMAAHA9d.jpg:large

Who is Maddow, tbh?

And lol @ Q... the revolving doors of Washington are well known... plus Congress looks pretty intact. Swamp is alive and well (unfortunately).

[Mikeanaro]

And who has run it since Trump has been in office?
The article talks about Brennan, why are you mixing things up?
Is Trump guilty of Benghazi or Lewinsky?

[spurraider21]

Kim Lacapria, Snopes’ main political “fact checker,” describes herself as “openly left-leaning” and a liberal. She has previously equated Tea Party conservatives with jihadists.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/17/fact-checking-snopes-websites-political-fact-checker-is-just-a-failed-liberal-blogger/


Snopes previously tried to “debunk” claims that the New York Times had colluded with Clinton’s campaign by warning them in advance about potentially negative stories that were about to be published, despite Wikileaks emails proving this to be true on two separate occasions.

https://www.snopes.com/news/2016/10/14/new-york-times-warns-clinton-campaign/
https://foia.state.gov/searchapp/DOCUMENTS/AugSept2016/F-2012-20462/DOC_0C05572024/C05572024.pdf


In December 2016, an investigative report revealed how Snopes was accused of using company money to pay for prostitutes.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4042194/Facebook-fact-checker-arbitrate-fake-news-accused-defrauding-website-pay-prostitutes-staff-includes-escort-porn-star-Vice-Vixen-domme.html


Spurtacular is correct in his assessment that Snopes was just a tool for the DNC. Snopes has been the "official" debunker for the Clinton Cartel since it has evolved from just a myth buster operation.
UK daily mail good
UK guardian bad

[Mikeanaro]

you are really bad at exposing yourself. There can be no question you have sucked at least one cock, though I’m guessing more. I am telling you that no one here will judge you for being a faggot.

People do judge you for being stupid, and for not admitting that you’re gay when it’s so obvious.

Just don’t go Orlando gay nightclub shooter, and kill other innocent people because you can’t come to grips with the fact that you fantasize about men, want to touch other men, want to kiss other men, and let other men penetrate you. This goes for spurty and obviously that kori thing as well.

If you can’t live with it, kill yourselves. Leave innocent people alone
Wow, you talk just like a giant retard.
The only gay here is you, how the fuck can you be a manly man if you support freaks like a crazy bitch?
How the fuck you cant understand that?

You support guys eating each other´s dicks, eating their shitty asses and sharing cum but we are the faggots?
Most gays have identity crisis, and thats you Bon Bon boy.

[Pavlov]

The article talks about Brennan, why are you mixing things up?
Is Trump guilty of Benghazi or Lewinsky?Brennan hasn't been in the CIA since January 2017.

Snopes is still going.

Who has run Snopes since then?

[Mikeanaro]

Brennan hasn't been in the CIA since January 2017.

Snopes is still going.

Who has run Snopes since then?
And the FBI was pro Hillary and Comey was with her.
How it ended?

[Pavlov]

And the FBI was pro Hillary and Comey was with her.
How it ended?You didn't answer the question.

Brennan hasn't been in the CIA since January 2017.

Snopes is still going.

Who has run Snopes since then?

[Mikeanaro]

My last post answered your question.
Mueller was a Rosenstein choice, he is a ¨republican¨ in a Trump administration.
How is Mueller helping Trump?
Also, you pretend Snopes to change his facts from the past, just like that?
So suddenly it becomes a friendly Trump site?

Snopes is democratic propaganda, is not a serious place like the article said but since your retard demmie buddies think SNL Colbert or John Oliver are serious politic analysts...

So you have things like this now

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hillary-clinton-rare-disease/

[Pavlov]

My last post answered your question.
Mueller was a Rosenstein choice, he is a ¨republican¨ in a Trump administration.
How is Mueller helping Trump?
Also, you pretend Snopes to change his facts from the past, just like that?
So suddenly it becomes a friendly Trump site?

Snopes is democratic propaganda, is not a serious place like the article said but since your retard demmie buddies think SNL Colbert or John Oliver are serious politic analysts...

So you have things like this now

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hillary-clinton-rare-disease/You didn't answer the question.

Brennan hasn't been in the CIA since January 2017.

Snopes is still going.

Who has run Snopes since then?

[Mikeanaro]

You didn't answer the question.

Brennan hasn't been in the CIA since January 2017.

Snopes is still going.

Who has run Snopes since then?
I dont have to, your are not an universal judge so

My last post answered your question.
Mueller was a Rosenstein choice, he is a ¨republican¨ in a Trump administration.
How is Mueller helping Trump?
Also, you pretend Snopes to change his facts from the past, just like that?
So suddenly it becomes a friendly Trump site?

Snopes is democratic propaganda, is not a serious place like the article said but since your retard demmie buddies think SNL Colbert or John Oliver are serious politic analysts...

So you have things like this now

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hi...-rare-disease/ (https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hillary-clinton-rare-disease/)

[Pavlov]

I dont have toNo one said you had to.

Your whole theory just falls apart.

Brennan is not in the CIA anymore.

Brennan never ran Snopes. He was briefing Clinton every day when it started then moved to Saudi Arabia. Somehow you're stupid enough to think he was running Snopes the entire time and apparently still is.

You're an idiot.

[Mikeanaro]

No one said you had to.

Your whole theory just falls apart.

Brennan is not in the CIA anymore.

Brennan never ran Snopes. He was briefing Clinton every day when it started then moved to Saudi Arabia. Somehow you're stupid enough to think he was running Snopes the entire time and apparently still is.

You're an idiot.
You think everything is absolute, and you believe in the Russia CULO-SION

You are what???
Fuck no!

[Pavlov]

You think everything is absolute, and you believe in the Russia CULO-SION

You are what???
Fuck no!No, your Snopes/CIA conspiracy theory proves you're an idiot.

Absolutely.

[Mikeanaro]

No, your Snopes/CIA conspiracy theory proves you're an idiot.

Absolutely.
Like I said, If Im an idiot you are...?

[Pavlov]

Like I said, If Im an idiot you are...?Not an idiot.

Pretty simple.

[Mikeanaro]

Not an idiot.

Pretty simple.
:idiot

[Pavlov]

:idiotYou failed to prove the CIA has anything to do with Snopes.

[Chris]

Gen. Michael Hayden, the former NSA and CIA director, has inadvertently revealed the ultimate subtext for the political establishment’s antagonism towards President Trump.

Trump has “normalized lying to an unprecedented degree,” Hayden writes in a New York Times op-ed, adding: “In this post-truth world, intelligence agencies are in the bunker with some unlikely mates: journalism, academia, the courts, law enforcement and science — all of which, like intelligence gathering, are evidence-based. Intelligence shares a broader duty with these other truth-tellers to preserve the commitment and ability of our society to base important decisions on our best judgment of what constitutes objective reality.”

[Pavlov]

What does that have to do with Snopes?

[Mikeanaro]

You failed to prove the CIA has anything to do with Snopes.
Read the article, everything is just propaganda to brainwash naive minds.

[Pavlov]

Read the article, everything is just propaganda to brainwash naive minds.The article failed to prove the CIA has anything to do with Snopes.

[Mikeanaro]

The article failed to prove the CIA has anything to do with Snopes.
Failed to you, is not the same thing.
Hillary failed for real.

[Cuppycake Gumdrop]

Hillary
*ding*

[Mikeanaro]

*ding*
*dong*
It gets better every day, to wake up and tell Hillary to snowflakes, she lost yesterday today and tomorrow.
Did she win???

[Cuppycake Gumdrop]

*dong*
It gets better every day, to wake up and tell Hillary to snowflakes, she lost yesterday today and tomorrow.
Did she win???
:lmao Hillary livin rent free

[Mikeanaro]

:lmao Hillary livin rent free
Living rent free in a place with an elevator, because she cant even walk down the fucking stairs.
What a loser
:lmao

[Pavlov]

Living rent free in a place with an elevator, because she cant even walk down the fucking stairs.
What a loser
:lmaoYou can't stop thinking about her.
:lmao

[Blake]

*dong*
It gets better every day, to wake up and tell Hillary to snowflakes, she lost yesterday today and tomorrow.
Did she win???

You think trump bashers are inherently Hillary cheerleaders.

You're really stupid.

[Mikeanaro]

you are really bad at this. You just outed yourself.
Yeah, specially that part it says you support guys eating each other´s dicks....

[Mikeanaro]

You think trump bashers are inherently Hillary cheerleaders.

You're really stupid.
Who gives a fuck, she lost and you all whine every day, its beautiful.

[Mikeanaro]

You can't stop thinking about her.
:lmao
Actually you cant stop thinking about Trump, he won she lost.
Every day is a miracle, watching you snowflakes complain about everything.

[Pavlov]

Actually you cant stop thinking about TrumpAs President of the United States, Dennison is often the topic in the Political Forum.

As Clinton holds no political office -- she lives rent free in your head forever.

[Mikeanaro]

As President of the United States, Dennison is often the topic in the Political Forum.

As Clinton holds no political office -- she lives rent free in your head forever.
When Bozo was president he wasnt inside everyone´s heads all the time.
Lol ¨HE IS THE PRESIDENT¨ card.

Clinton is above politics, she is the ultimate loser and the poster girl of liberal freaks.
:lmao WHAT HAPPENED!

She can have the full apartment!

[Pavlov]

When Bozo was president he wasnt inside everyone´s heads all the time.
Lol ¨HE IS THE PRESIDENT¨ card.

Clinton is above politics, she is the ultimate loser and the poster girl of liberal freaks.
:lmao WHAT HAPPENED!

She can have the full apartment!She has an entire subdivision in your head.

Rent free.

[Blake]

Who gives a fuck, she lost and you all whine every day, its beautiful.

No. You're really stupid.

[Mikeanaro]

She has an entire subdivision in your head.

Rent free.
http://jokes4laugh.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Hillary-Clinton-Pictures-9.jpg

[Mikeanaro]

No. You're really stupid.
More whining from the superior elitist ones.

[Pavlov]

http://jokes4laugh.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Hillary-Clinton-Pictures-9.jpg:lol you just posted about her again.

Proved my point.

[Blake]

More whining from the superior elitist ones.

No. Keep beating on that strawman tho and I'll kick back and lol at how stupid you are.

[Spurtacular]

No. You're really stupid.

You seriously post this gimp sh** pretty much verbatim in like half the threads you post in.

[Spurtacular]

As President of the United States, Dennison is often the topic in the Political Forum.

As Clinton holds no political office -- she lives rent free in your head forever.

:lol

#StillWithHer

[Pavlov]

:lol

#StillWithHer
No one has to be with anyone to know she lives rent free in your heads.

:lol

[Spurtacular]

Well, you choose to believe something you have no proof of, and hope it to be true. That's pretty much the definition of faith.

When you say: "I believe that the CIA is a sanctioned criminal organization" you're telling me what you believe, but not what you know. The latter would require you to have some sort of evidence of that to be the case, but if you did, you probably wouldn't be the first one to have such evidence, and there would be no CIA.

In a sense, you rather go with your intuition and form opinion on that vs actually accept that either there's no evidence to support the claim or that the findings are inconclusive, and 'don't know' is a perfectly valid answer.

In reality, everything is a lot simpler. Things either are or are not, and if we didn't find out yet, 'don't know' is a perfectly rational position. This applies to all areas that attempt futurology, including religion, science, sports, etc.

Unless you're doing specific research on the 'don't know' state, it's actually pretty boring, uneventful and not really worth the time subject, IMVHO.

BTW, I'm not going to chastise you for having an opinion, that's perfectly valid, even if I don't share it.

1. The CIA spies, participates in murder and mayhem, sabotages, rigs elections, "tortures", etc and with surprisingly little accountability. These are documented descriptions of their activities, many of which they have admitted to doing. Who is taking it on "trust faith" that they're a wonderful organization? That is apparently you.

2. Even if these activities had not been documented, I'd still say that you're the one taking it on faith. I've learned that power unchecked leads to very bad things. Abraham Lincoln said as much. You are very much the one taking it on faith that the CIA are the good guys.

[Spurtacular]

No one has to be with anyone to know she lives rent free in your heads.

:lol

You wouldn't worry about it if you weren't #StillWithHer :lmao

[Pavlov]

1. The CIA spies, participates in murder and mayhem, sabotages, rigs elections, "tortures", etc and with surprisingly little accountability. These are documented descriptions of their activities, many of which they have admitted to doing. Who is taking it on "trust faith" that they're a wonderful organization? That is apparently you.

2. Even if these activities had not occurred, I'd still say that you're the one taking it on faith. I've learned that power unchecked leads to very bad things. Abraham Lincoln said as much. You are very much the one taking it on faith that the CIA are the good guys.

Why specifically do you think they run this website?

[Pavlov]

You wouldn't worry about it if you weren't #StillWithHer :lmao
lol "worried"

You simply can't deny she's living rent free in your heads.

[Spurtacular]

Why specifically do you think they run this website?

I've never claimed that. But I would figure that they are connected directly or indirectly.

[Chris]

"rent free" is Pavlov's new white flag

[Spurtacular]

lol "worried"

You simply can't deny she's living rent free in your heads.

She lost the election and was put out to pasture. Your claim is weak on its face. But apparently you need to lash out cos you're still quite butthurt.

[Pavlov]

I've never claimed that. But I would figure that they are connected directly or indirectly.
Why? What is your evidence?

[Pavlov]

"rent free" is Pavlov's new white flag
Clinton's been your white flag for a year and a half.

[Pavlov]

She lost the election and was put out to pasture. Your claim is weak on its face. But apparently you need to lash out cos you're still quite butthurt.
You keep talking about her.

[Spurtacular]

Why? What is your evidence?

You use the same funnels over and over, bro.

[Pavlov]

You use the same funnels over and over, bro.

Just say you have no reason or evidence.

[Spurtacular]

Clinton's been your white flag for a year and a half.

Maybe it's time to heal on the cheap, dude.

(I Dunno) What Happened? for $1.99 :lmao

https://www.barnesandnoble.com/p/what-happened-hillary-rodham-clinton/1126860359/2678884694929?st=PLA&sid=BNB_DRS_Core+Catch-All,+Low_00000000&2sid=Google_&sourceId=PLGoP79700&gclid=EAIaIQobChMItaaKluz02gIVmNlkCh2UvgjeEAYYASAB EgI9_fD_BwE

[Pavlov]

Maybe it's time to heal on the cheap, dude.

What Happened? for $1.99 :lmao

https://www.barnesandnoble.com/p/what-happened-hillary-rodham-clinton/1126860359/2678884694929?st=PLA&sid=BNB_DRS_Core+Catch-All,+Low_00000000&2sid=Google_&sourceId=PLGoP79700&gclid=EAIaIQobChMItaaKluz02gIVmNlkCh2UvgjeEAYYASAB EgI9_fD_BwE
You are the ones who keep talking about her.

:lol

[Spurtacular]

Just say you have no reason or evidence.

Me having no evidence would not preclude the occurrence. This is why you constantly trying to pretend you're a lawyer in a courtroom is a bit sad.

[Spurtacular]

You are the ones who keep talking about her.

:lol

I don't mind rubbing the salt in your wound. Was that supposed to be a good point?

[Pavlov]

Me having no evidence would not preclude the occurrence. This is why you constantly trying to pretend you're a lawyer in a courtroom is a bit sad.

:lol you get so defensive when you're caught talking out of your assistance.

[Pavlov]

I don't mind rubbing the salt in your wound. Was that supposed to be a good point?She lives rent free in your head.

[Spurtacular]

She lives rent free in your head.


"rent free" is Pavlov's new white flag

Definitely a coping mechanism.

:lol #StillWithHer

[ElNono]

1. The CIA spies, participates in murder and mayhem, sabotages, rigs elections, "tortures", etc and with surprisingly little accountability. These are documented descriptions of their activities, many of which they have admitted to doing. Who is taking it on "trust faith" that they're a wonderful organization? That is apparently you.

2. Even if these activities had not been documented, I'd still say that you're the one taking it on faith. I've learned that power unchecked leads to very bad things. Abraham Lincoln said as much. You are very much the one taking it on faith that the CIA are the good guys.

I abhor what I read about their rendition program, etc, but I would need to take a leap of faith to ascertain that: 1) it happened as described, 2) they did not have the authority to do so (thus making them a criminal organization).

Now, we can certainly agree that if they carried out these operations as described, the whole thing is abhorrent, *even* if they had authorization to do so (although, it's debatable whether the responsibility lies on the whole agency or the person making those authorizations).

So it has nothing to do with me thinking they're a wonderful organization or a terrible organization, it's just that I prefer not to draw conclusions from allegations. I would expect the same courtesy applied to me (or anybody else for that matter).

[Pavlov]

Definitely a coping mechanism.

:lol #StillWithHerDefinitely your coping mechanism.

[Chris]

Definitely a coping mechanism.

:lol #StillWithHer

993646883053735942

[spurraider21]

oh look, a sweeping, non-substantive statement that chris takes as absolute fact

[Mikeanaro]

No. Keep beating on that strawman tho and I'll kick back and lol at how stupid you are.
Of course, more whining from liberal losers, the only thing you know in life.

[Mikeanaro]

:lol you just posted about her again.

Proved my point.
She can live forever, as you are forever butthurted because Trump won, and her loss makes your feelings hurt.

[Pavlov]

She can live forever, as you are forever butthurted because Trump won, and her loss makes your feelings hurt.You're still posting about her.

:lol rent free

[Blake]

Of course, more whining from liberal losers, the only thing you know in life.

No. Lol.

[Blake]

You seriously post this gimp sh** pretty much verbatim in like half the threads you post in.

Just my honest assessment tbh

[Spurtacular]

Just my honest assessment tbh

I can see why you'd stick to the standard gimp schtick. Your improvisational skills are even gimpier. But maybe this is on me for not just letting you be gimpy in peace, tbh.

[Chris]

I can see why you'd stick to the standard gimp schtick. Your improvisational skills are even gimpier. But maybe this is on me for not just letting you be gimpy in peace, tbh.

The forum gimp :lol



https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thescarletabbey.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2016%2F01%2Fpulp_fiction_67674 .jpg&f=1

[Blake]

The forum gimp :lol



https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thescarletabbey.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2016%2F01%2Fpulp_fiction_67674 .jpg&f=1

:lol :lol Chris searching for gimp pics

[Blake]

I can see why you'd stick to the standard gimp schtick. Your improvisational skills are even gimpier. But maybe this is on me for not just letting you be gimpy in peace, tbh.

You being a fucking idiot is on you, idiot.

Honest assessment, tbh

[koriwhat]

No you fucking worthless piece of shit waste of life. It’s a bullshit little term the people that think for fucking scared little mongoloid bitches to try to give you morons a little buzzword to keep you in line because they know you’re scared and worthless requiring to be thought for.

Just fucking kill yourselves you serve no purpose

lmao pissed off much sissy boy? are you "triggered"? lol bonnerbitchface

[Blake]

lmao pissed off much sissy boy? are you "triggered"? lol bonnerbitchface

That's rich

[Spurtacular]

You being a fucking idiot is on you, idiot.

Honest assessment, tbh

I do like that you were able to make a meme out of the honest assessment thing. But it doesn't erase glaring realities. Get over your Butthurt and stop being a headcase. Actual honest assessment.

[Blake]

I do like that you were able to make a meme out of the honest assessment thing. But it doesn't erase glaring realities. Get over your Butthurt and stop being a headcase. Actual honest assessment.

Dishonest bluster and blather.

You're an idiot.

[dabom]

:lol :lol Chris searching for gimp pics

Probably from his personal collection...

[Spurtacular]

Dishonest bluster and blather.

You're an idiot.

A cuck calling me an idiot. How will I go on?

[Blake]

A cuck calling me an idiot. How will I go on?

Nobody would blame you if you didn't

[Chucho]

Nobody would blame you if you didn't


Tee hee. That's a good'n.

[Spurtacular]

Nobody would blame you if you didn't

At least I wouldn't have cuck on my resume.

[Blake]

At least I wouldn't have cuck on my resume.

So you'd rather be dead than get cheated on?

:lol

[Spurtacular]

So you'd rather be dead than get cheated on?

:lol

Everyone dies; not everyone gets cucked.

And :lol at "cheated on". Your ex-wife obviously realized she had cheated herself by settling for you.

[Pavlov]

Everyone dies; not everyone gets cucked.

And :lol at "cheated on". Your ex-wife obviously realized she had cheated herself by settling for you.Would you be more likely to be hired after people see you are dead on your resume?

[Spurtacular]

Would you be more likely to be hired after people see you are dead on your resume?

:lol Someone gonna hire Blake to play Grand Theft Auto?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwKxjqZjIJs

[Pavlov]

:lol Someone gonna hire Blake to play Grand Theft Auto?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwKxjqZjIJsYou didn't answer the question.

[Spurtacular]

You didn't answer the question.

:lmao I'll take my chances on being a zombie over this:

https://i1.wp.com/mattlawrence.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Mighty-Cucks.jpg?fit=500%2C400

[Pavlov]

:lmao I'll take my chances on being a zombie over that:

https://i1.wp.com/mattlawrence.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Mighty-Cucks.jpg?fit=500%2C400:lol grudge porn searches

[Spurtacular]

:lol grudge porn searches

Grudge = Coping term. :lol

[Pavlov]

Grudge = Coping term. :lol:lol your porn searches, grudges and lashing out are attempts to cope with your feelings of inadequacy.

[Pavlov]

As are your fake quotes.

Declarations of victory.

Thesaurus use.

Etc.

[Spurtacular]

:lol your porn searches, grudges and lashing out are attempts to cope with your feelings of inadequacy.

Second time you've made this charge as it relates to cuck blake. If that's your gold standard, I think we know who is feeling inadequate. :lmao

[Pavlov]

Second time you've made this charge as it relates to cuck blake. If that's your gold standard, I think we know who is feeling inadequate. :lmaoI've said you're insecure more than twice tbh.

[Spurtacular]

As are your fake quotes.

Declarations of victory.

Thesaurus use.

Etc.

Your grudge list

Etc.

[Pavlov]

Your grudge list

Etc.Just forcing you to try something new.

So far, nothing.

[Spurtacular]

Just forcing you to try something new.

So far, nothing.

By using tired schtick and the same failed posting templates? :lol

[Pavlov]

By using tired schtick and the same failed posting templates? :lol:lol I just posted your templates and you're upset.

[Spurtacular]

:lol I just posted your templates and you're upset.

Sure. W templates.

[Pavlov]

Sure. W templates.


As are your fake quotes.

Declarations of victory.

Thesaurus use.

Etc.lol

[Spurtacular]

lol

Am I not progressive enough for you? Nobody's the winner. :lol

[Pavlov]

Am I not progressive enough for you? Nobody's the winner. :lolIt was your declaration.

[Spurtacular]

It was your declaration.

Do you want me to just call it how it is and just call your boring and trite?

[Pavlov]

Do you want me to just call it how it is and just call your boring and trite?You're the one responding.

[RandomGuy]

Dude, get a doctor or a couple of hunks, this lack of dick is seriously making you a psycho.
No one would be so mad at a LGTB comment unless he is one of them.

Funny thing is you support a woman that got money from countries that pushes gays and lesbians off of buildings.
First your kind had no rights, then in more modern times they got rights, now that you got rights you get intolerant.
Fuck you all you freaks.

meh. More made up shit from a troll account.

At least you are making some sense now.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1143278457289412608

[spurraider21]

https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1143278457289412608
:lmao

1 – The first reason is not so much reason as it is a suspicion.

[Blake]

:lol ^

Lol Chris

[Pavlov]

"After doing some digging on various websites"

:rollin

[Reck]

:lol Their main page.

[ElNono]

:lmao

1 – The first reason is not so much reason as it is a suspicion.

:lmao

[pgardn]

:lmao

1 – The first reason is not so much reason as it is a suspicion.

Holy shit.

Chris for God’s sake man, fckn read what you are posting.
You just gave yourself a head injury.

[spurraider21]

Holy shit.

Chris for God’s sake man, fckn read what you are posting.
You just gave yourself a head injury.
he cant read anything beyond 280 character tweets. so naturally he read the posobiec tweet and not the underlying article which was linked

[Winehole23]

he cant read anything beyond 280 character tweets. so naturally he read the posobiec tweet and not the underlying article which was linkedThink of Chris as a walking billboard or megaphone. Own takes aren't really his thing.

[Blake]

Think of Chris as a walking billboard or megaphone. Own takes aren't really his thing.

He needs takes from people in stations far above him. People like Chuck Woolery.