Michael Cohen is doing Awesome thread

[hater]

Almost a million posts in 27 thousand threads. This section is getting most of the site's traffic as of the last 2 years. :lol in2anal.

Its not good if its mostly from 2 or 3 posters, Zuckerberg :lmao

Its actually more pathetic that originaly thought :lol

[djohn2oo8]

Its not good if its mostly from 2 or 3 posters, Zuckerberg :lmao

Its actually more pathetic that originaly thought :lol
You 50 plus threads that get 1 reply each don’t come close. I sense you are on the rag about that

[in2deep]

You 50 plus threads that get 1 reply each don’t come close. I sense you are on the rag about that

:lmao being proud to spam an NBA forum with political retweets :lol its not even posts of your own

you gonna tell your grandkids about your feat champ?

[hater]

:lmao being proud to spam an NBA forum with political retweets :lol its not even posts of your own

you gonna tell your grandkids about your feat champ?

:lmao

Poor guy

Leave him alone bro. This is getting sad

[djohn2oo8]

:lmao being proud to spam an NBA forum with political retweets :lol its not even posts of your own

you gonna tell your grandkids about your feat champ?
The NBA forum and political forum are two separate forums. Dipshit :lmao

Holy fuck :rollin

[in2deep]

:lmao

Poor guy

Leave him alone bro. This is getting sad

lol

ok will leave the poor kid alone. Hes probably an emo high school kid for alm we know

carry on johnny :tu

[RandomGuy]

Spamming the site with random tweets did not increase traffic

I dont even think traffic has increased but decreased :lol

There is nothing wrong with random tweets. Those are the best kind.

[in2deep]

The NBA forum and political forum are two separate forums. Dipshit :lmao

Spurstalk.com kid

Carry on :tu

[djohn2oo8]

lol

ok will leave the poor kid alone. Hes probably an emo high school kid for alm we know

carry on johnny :tu
Another post. Another view for the thread :tu

[RandomGuy]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DlNSXE5XsAItSE0.jpg

:lol

[djohn2oo8]

Spurstalk.com kid

Carry on :tu
- Political forum

:lol

[djohn2oo8]

In2deep mad there’s a political forum :rollin

[spurraider21]

Cohen is going to flip. Non-issue.


1032228389241974785
1032232336602083328
1032226154051190784
1032229446168838144

[RandomGuy]

Between his sorry ass and boutons and randomguy Im not sure whos the biggest loser in this site

Translation:

":cry somebody said something I don't agree with, I can't handle that, boo hoo"

Do you need a hankie?

[Reck]

Its not good if its mostly from 2 or 3 posters, Zuckerberg :lmao

Its actually more pathetic that originaly thought :lol

You apparently cant count.

[djohn2oo8]

You apparently cant count.
lol. TSA Chris Darrin. That’s three right there. Excluding Pavlov Myself You. And anyone else. :lol

[Pavlov]

And :lmao anyone thinking this payoff will amount to anything :lmao

Mueller himself said his mandate only goes as far as Russia collusion :lmao :lolNow take the other side of the argument in another thread.

[BD24]

Hater must have a gaping ass hole by now from constantly sitting on the fence.

[djohn2oo8]

Hater must have a gaping ass hole by now from constantly sitting on the fence.
Lol

[Brazil]

:lol Trump own lawyer accuses him of committing felony and the trumpards are like... not a big deal, where is collusion, fraud not a big deal...

holy fuck :lmao

what would it take for them to start questionning their dear president ? a video showing him killing somebody ? and even that, they would go :cry but but collusion :cry

bunch of clowns

[boutons_deux]

What you might have missed in the Cohen plea

President Trump’s former personal attorney Michael Cohen has accused Trump of directing him to commit crimes with the intention of improperly influencing the 2016 election. That is stunning and will have ramifications

If the accusations are true, Trump will have committed a crime, should be impeached and, after leaving office, prosecuted.

Did you notice all the other people implicated in Cohen’s plea?

There is “Corporation-1,” presumably American Media Inc. (AMI), which owns the National Enquirer (“Magazine-1”).

Members of Corporation-1 (including editor in chief, or “Editor-1”) would presumably have information and be able to corroborate Cohen’s account regarding the Karen McDougal payoff.

The information document filed against Cohen also notes the existence of a text between Editor-1 and Cohen, corroboration of the arrangement to pay off a second woman, presumably Stormy Daniels.

let’s not forget the “executives of the Company” [Trump’s] who “grossed up” the reimbursement to Cohen;

that’s two or more additional witnesses.

We learn that “Executive-1” received the request or reimbursement and shared it with more executives. More witnesses.

In Count 7, Cohen is accused of enabling Corporation-1 to make an illegal corporate campaign donation.

That means the company and/or its executives might have liability as well.

Count 8 mentions campaign executives (who might they be? how many?) who worked with Cohen to effectuate the scheme.

it’s not Cohen’s word against Trump’s, but rather

a raft of witnesses whom prosecutors have or will be able to talk to (some to avoid liability of their own) and documents as well.

There is, in short, a ton of evidence out there concerning the campaign finance scheme to make sure two women didn’t mess up Trump’s chances of getting elected.

While the legal implications of Cohen’s plea are stunning,

let’s not forget the immediate political ramifications when a president is accused of breaking the law to get elected.

a scheme was cooked up to prevent them from finding out. It stands to reason that

Trump gained the presidency illegitimately.

it is very possible that Trump was right — the revelations about Daniels and McDougal, in addition to the “Access Hollywood” tape, could have sunk him.

He thought that was the case, so why shouldn’t he pay them off?

Cohen will still need the prosecutors’ help if he wants a reduced sentence and to avoid other charges from being leveled.

It’s inconceivable that Cohen, to obtain the benefit of the plea deal, wouldn’t be required to testify and provide other assistance (e.g. letting prosecutors into his phone).

Cohen has the means and the motivation to expose Trump, at the very least with respect to the payoffs that helped get Trump elected.

Cohen therefore not only poses a legal threat to Trump but also

has the ability to delegitimize Trump’s presidency.

This is big — really big.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/opinions/wp/2018/08/22/what-you-may-have-missed-in-the-cohen-plea/?utm_term=.0107c6adad4d&wpisrc=nl_most&wpmm=1

[Winehole23]

so long as the GOP stands firm, DJT will remain in office.

DJT will have to be removed or step down before he faces a single charge for anything.

[boutons_deux]

After employing Cohen for 12 years! :lol, now Trash tweets to look elsewhere for a good lawyer :lol

[Winehole23]

AP puts it in a nutshell, notable here are the (alleged) family foundation shenanigans


On Oct. 26, 2016, just weeks before the election, Cohen drew down $131,000 from a home equity line of credit he obtained by lying about his debt and cash flow. He wired funds to a lawyer for Daniels, falsely saying that it was for a “retainer,” and exactly one week before the election, received copies of a signed confidential agreement with the actress.


Prosecutors allege that Trump Organization executives ultimately reimbursed Cohen for both the $130,000 hush money payment to Daniels and another $50,000 for “tech services” that Cohen solicited on the Trump campaign’s behalf.
Prosecutors cited an email in which one unnamed Trump Organization executive told another to pay Cohen $420,000 out of “the trust,” the indictment says, disguising the money as payment owed to Cohen under a legal retainer agreement.
https://apnews.com/27bb7773c8bc4d4292862057d89b5146

[Winehole23]

strike that, Trump Organization shenanigans

[RandomGuy]

What you might have missed in the Cohen plea

President Trump’s former personal attorney Michael Cohen has accused Trump of directing him to commit crimes with the intention of improperly influencing the 2016 election. That is stunning and will have ramifications

If the accusations are true, Trump will have committed a crime, should be impeached and, after leaving office, prosecuted.

Did you notice all the other people implicated in Cohen’s plea?

There is “Corporation-1,” presumably American Media Inc. (AMI), which owns the National Enquirer (“Magazine-1”).

Members of Corporation-1 (including editor in chief, or “Editor-1”) would presumably have information and be able to corroborate Cohen’s account regarding the Karen McDougal payoff.

The information document filed against Cohen also notes the existence of a text between Editor-1 and Cohen, corroboration of the arrangement to pay off a second woman, presumably Stormy Daniels.

let’s not forget the “executives of the Company” [Trump’s] who “grossed up” the reimbursement to Cohen;

that’s two or more additional witnesses.

We learn that “Executive-1” received the request or reimbursement and shared it with more executives. More witnesses.

In Count 7, Cohen is accused of enabling Corporation-1 to make an illegal corporate campaign donation.

That means the company and/or its executives might have liability as well.

Count 8 mentions campaign executives (who might they be? how many?) who worked with Cohen to effectuate the scheme.

it’s not Cohen’s word against Trump’s, but rather

a raft of witnesses whom prosecutors have or will be able to talk to (some to avoid liability of their own) and documents as well.

There is, in short, a ton of evidence out there concerning the campaign finance scheme to make sure two women didn’t mess up Trump’s chances of getting elected.

While the legal implications of Cohen’s plea are stunning,

let’s not forget the immediate political ramifications when a president is accused of breaking the law to get elected.

a scheme was cooked up to prevent them from finding out. It stands to reason that

Trump gained the presidency illegitimately.

it is very possible that Trump was right — the revelations about Daniels and McDougal, in addition to the “Access Hollywood” tape, could have sunk him.

He thought that was the case, so why shouldn’t he pay them off?

Cohen will still need the prosecutors’ help if he wants a reduced sentence and to avoid other charges from being leveled.

It’s inconceivable that Cohen, to obtain the benefit of the plea deal, wouldn’t be required to testify and provide other assistance (e.g. letting prosecutors into his phone).

Cohen has the means and the motivation to expose Trump, at the very least with respect to the payoffs that helped get Trump elected.

Cohen therefore not only poses a legal threat to Trump but also

has the ability to delegitimize Trump’s presidency.

This is big — really big.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/opinions/wp/2018/08/22/what-you-may-have-missed-in-the-cohen-plea/?utm_term=.0107c6adad4d&wpisrc=nl_most&wpmm=1

Looks like the Enquirer is going to go down the shitter. Good riddance.

[djohn2oo8]

1032324046627766272

:lmao wow

[Winehole23]

“Later on I knew. Later on. But you have to understand, what he did -- and they weren’t taken out of campaign finance, that’s the big thing. That’s a much bigger thing. Did they come out of the campaign? They didn’t come out of the campaign, they came from me. And I tweeted about it. You know, I put -- I don’t know if you know but I tweeted about the payments. But they didn’t come out of campaign. In fact, my first question when I heard about it was did they come out of the campaign because that could be a little dicey. And they didn’t come out of the campaign and that’s big."

[Winehole23]

April 5, 2018 — In his first public comments about Daniels, Trump tells reporters aboard Air Force One that he didn’t know about Cohen’s payment.


Asked whether he knew about the payment, Trump says flatly: “No.” Asked why Cohen made the payment, he says, “You’ll have to ask Michael Cohen.”


When asked where Cohen got the money, Trump says, “I don’t know.”

[Pavlov]

1032324046627766272

:lmao wowlol what a dumbass.

"dicey"

"Obama"

[hitmanyr2k]

“Later on I knew. Later on. But you have to understand, what he did -- and they weren’t taken out of campaign finance, that’s the big thing. That’s a much bigger thing. Did they come out of the campaign? They didn’t come out of the campaign, they came from me. And I tweeted about it. You know, I put -- I don’t know if you know but I tweeted about the payments. But they didn’t come out of campaign. In fact, my first question when I heard about it was did they come out of the campaign because that could be a little dicey. And they didn’t come out of the campaign and that’s big."



The Trump version of "See, what had happened was...."

[boutons_deux]

"They came from me."

cohen's indictment says he got the $400K+ from the Trash Org, not Trash personally.

but it's never clear WTF Trash is talking about.

[KenMcCoy]

Sometimes it's difficult to remember where the payment comes from. I have a hard time keeping track remembering if I paid out of a personal account, investment account, business account. Did my lawyer pay this? Or my financial advisor? Or my book keeper?

<sarcasm>

[Reck]

1032324046627766272

:lmao wow

Melania the cucktress.

[djohn2oo8]

1032345425884471296

and here come the state crimes

[Blake]

You guys got all excited for nothing.

lol

:lol

[Blake]

1032247043992023040

[TSA]

:lol

Chris is right though. There was no crime concerning campaign finance violations therefore no crime linked to Trump. Had Cohen faught that count in court he’d have won. He plead guilty to it to get leniency for the actual crimes he committed. Slimy move by the prosecutors to try and link a “crime” to Trump.

[spurraider21]

Chris is right though. There was no crime concerning campaign finance violations therefore no crime linked to Trump. Had Cohen faught that count in court he’d have won. He plead guilty to it to get leniency for the actual crimes he committed. Slimy move by the prosecutors to try and link a “crime” to Trump.
#redpill

[Blake]

Chris is right though. There was no crime concerning campaign finance violations therefore no crime linked to Trump. Had Cohen faught that count in court he’d have won. He plead guilty to it to get leniency for the actual crimes he committed. Slimy move by the prosecutors to try and link a “crime” to Trump.

If Cohen would have won instead of taking a plea deal then Trump is right, he really isn't a good attorney.

[Pavlov]

Crime isn't crime!

[djohn2oo8]

Crime isn't crime!
Because Hillary is a cannibal

[TSA]

If Cohen would have won instead of taking a plea deal then Trump is right, he really isn't a good attorney.

He would have beaten the campaign finance charges, fucked on the others so he took the deal.

[TSA]

Crime isn't crime!

The payments weren’t a crime.

[Blake]

He would have beaten the campaign finance charges, fucked on the others so he took the deal.

What message board did you get this from?

[djohn2oo8]

Funny how TSA says he would have beaten the charges when only Susan Rice was supposed to be charged

[Pavlov]

The payments weren’t a crime.It's a shame there is a law then....

So -- this is just another deep state conspiracy?

[Reck]

It's a shame there is a law then....

So -- this is just another deep state conspiracy?

Man, it's hilarious how fast and deep TSA burrows into these looney conspiracies.

[Spurminator]

He would have beaten the campaign finance charges, fucked on the others so he took the deal.

:lol False confidence.

Was part of the deal also for his lawyer to continue to verbally implicate Donald Trump in these charges he would have beaten?

That would be somewhat unprecedented in the history of plea deals. Usually a side benefit of a deal like this is you don't have to talk about the crime you were accused of anymore.

[djohn2oo8]

1032376866907336707

[Pavlov]

Lanny Davis assisting Michael Cohen with his legal issues:

http://i.imgur.com/uoknOdc.gif

[Reck]

1032376866907336707

Boy, I've never seen an innocent man plead guilty to crimes that aren't crimes so fast as well as badly wanting to cooperate as fast as this fine innocent gentleman is. :lol TSA

[Spurminator]

https://twitter.com/oneunderscore__/status/1032368845757923328

[Blake]

https://twitter.com/oneunderscore__/status/1032368845757923328

I'm not sure whether to lol or be very concerned

[Pavlov]

https://twitter.com/oneunderscore__/status/1032368845757923328Dems doxxing dead people.

No shame....

[TSA]

Lanny Davis assisting Michael Cohen with his legal issues:

http://i.imgur.com/uoknOdc.gif

Lanny Davis shitting all over your McClatchy story

1032378787982336000

:lol RandomGuy

[RandomGuy]

Dems doxxing dead people.

No shame....

VOTER FRAUD!!! LOOK OVER THERE!!!

[Pavlov]

Lanny Davis shitting all over your McClatchy story

1032378787982336000

:lol RandomGuyIf it's wrong it's wrong. A meeting could've happened anywhere in the EU.

Considering you are currently batting .000 on your pimped conspiracy theories -- lol TSA.

[RandomGuy]

strike that, Trump Organization shenanigans

That brings the Organization fully in the headlights of several investigations.

This is where it gets truly real. Once their records get subpoenaed you can expect some twitter meltdowns that make past ones look mild.

The first raid on TOs records by the FBI will be a shitstorm of biblical porportions.

[RandomGuy]

Lanny Davis shitting all over your McClatchy story

1032378787982336000

:lol RandomGuy

Interesting. I wonder what Cohen does have then. All the other stuff in that section of the dossier panned out.

If it wasn't this Cohen, then who?

We will get to see, won't we, pizza-boichik?

[RandomGuy]

Its going to b a photo finish thats for sure :lmao

https://assets.rbl.ms/18330355/980x.jpg

[TSA]

Lanny Davis assisting Michael Cohen with his legal issues:

1032310974236291072

http://i.imgur.com/uoknOdc.gif


:lmao

[Pavlov]

TSA reduced to cheering something like that.

lol TSA

[clambake]

the republican party is a criminal enterprise.

[Reck]

:lol TSA's desperation.

:cry In one thread he's whining about Cohen's lawyer making him sign a plea deal regardless of him being innnocent and in this one he's propping one of his quotes. :lol

What a chameleon.

[TSA]

Lanny Davis assisting Michael Cohen with his legal issues:

agGCc6sxY1k

http://i.imgur.com/uoknOdc.gif

:lmao

Skip to 20 mins. Lanny Davis admitting they have no evidence of Trump instructing Cohen to make the payments besides Cohen’s word.

lying criminal Cohen to the witness stand please :rollin

[TSA]

Interesting. I wonder what Cohen does have then. All the other stuff in that section of the dossier panned out.

If it wasn't this Cohen, then who?

We will get to see, won't we, pizza-boichik?

You keep saying all this stuff in the dossier panned out. List it all right here.

[Pavlov]

:lmao

Skip to 20 mins. Lanny Davis admitting they have no evidence of Trump instructing Cohen to make the payments besides Cohen’s word.

lying criminal Cohen to the witness stand please :rollinHas Trump ever lied, TSA?

[TSA]

Has Trump ever lied, TSA?

I’m sure he has. Have you ever lied, Pavlov?

Also new favorite lawyer seems to have put you in a pickle. Who do you believe now, Cohen/Lanny or Steele?

[Fabbs]

Have you ever lied, Pavlov?
:lol

[TSA]

Lanny Davis assisting Michael Cohen with his legal issues:

1032367459439788040

http://i.imgur.com/uoknOdc.gif

:lmao

[Spurminator]

TSA loves guilt-by-association innuendo.
Except when it involves the President of the United States.

:lol Posobiec

[spurraider21]

Avenatti = F:lolck:lold
:lmao

[Pavlov]

I’m sure he has. Have you ever lied, Pavlov?

Also new favorite lawyer seems to have put you in a pickle. Who do you believe now, Cohen/Lanny or Steele?lol "pickle"

The dossier is raw intel. Could be right or wrong.

My theories don't rely on Cohen's being in Prague at any time.

Your theories have been utterly destroyed time after time.

lol TSA

[Pavlov]

TSA loves guilt-by-association innuendo.
Except when it involves the President of the United States.

:lol PosobiecTSA is completely controlled by alt right twitter at this point.

Retarded conspiracy theory after retarded conspiracy theory.

lol pickle

[TSA]

lol "pickle"

The dossier is raw intel. Could be right or wrong.

My theories don't rely on Cohen's being in Prague at any time.

Your theories have been utterly destroyed time after time.

lol TSA

:lol double dodge

Try again

1. Have you ever lied, Pavlov?

2. Who do you believe now, Cohen/Lanny or Steele?

[DarrinS]

lol "pickle"

The dossier is raw intel. Could be right or wrong.

My theories don't rely on Cohen's being in Prague at any time.

Your theories have been utterly destroyed time after time.

lol TSA



What are your theories?

[Pavlov]

:lol double dodge

Try again

1. Have you ever lied, Pavlov?Yep. Have I been implemented in a federal crime by Cohen?


2. Who do you believe now, Cohen/Lanny or Steele?Dunno. Doesn't matter for my theory tbh.

What is your conspiracy theory now, TSA?

[Pavlov]

What are your theories?Darrin demands my theory once again after I explicitly told him twice and he's dodging his own question I have asked him at least twice today.

lol Darrin

[Blake]

:lol double dodge

Try again

1. Have you ever lied, Pavlov?

Irrelevant.

Tu quoque fallacy

[Pavlov]

Irrelevant.

Tu quoque fallacyTSA really got me with det one!

All his conspiracy fails disappeared!

#pizzagate

Clinton baby harvests

Uraniumania

All gone!

[DarrinS]

Darrin demands my theory once again after I explicitly told him twice and he's dodging his own question I have asked him at least twice today.

lol Darrin


What are your theories?

[Pavlov]

What are your theories?Do a search for the last two times you asked.

I believe you're too stupid to remember, Darrin.

[Pavlov]

In fact, you can use "too stupid" as a search string.

I used it each time.

Let me know if you're too stupid to find it on your own, Darrin.

[DarrinS]

In fact, you can use "too stupid" as a search string.

I used it each time.

Let me know if you're too stupid to find it on your own, Darrin.


What are your theories?

[Pavlov]

What are your theories?So you're too stupid to remember the last two times you asked and too stupid to search for them using the phrase I spoon fed you.

:tu

And it's one theory.

One, Darrin.

[DarrinS]

So you're too stupid to remember the last two times you asked and too stupid to search for them using the phrase I spoon fed you.

:tu

And it's one theory.

One, Darrin.


What are your theories?

Your schtick is easy, btw.

[Pavlov]

What are your theories?

Your schtick is easy, btw.Except I already answered you twice.

Sorry, Darrin.

[DarrinS]

Except I already answered you twice.

Sorry, Darrin.

I don’t feel like searching. What are your theories?

[Pavlov]

I don’t feel like searching.Sorry, Darrin.

[DarrinS]

Sorry, Darrin.

What are your theories? Too elaborate to repeat?

[Pavlov]

What are your theories? Too elaborate to repeat?Nope. It's pretty simple.

Apparently it was too much for you to remember.

Twice.

lol Darrin

[Winehole23]

hey DarrinS, why do you support Trump?

[DarrinS]

hey DarrinS, why do you support Trump?

I’m actually tired of his dumbass ill-advised tweets. I’m equally tired of 500+ days of screech panels talking about muhRussia on cable news every night.

[DarrinS]

But, I do like the economy under this admin.

[Pavlov]

I’m actually tired of his dumbass ill-advised tweets. I’m equally tired of 500+ days of screech panels talking about muhRussia on cable news every night.You didn't answer the question.

lol Darrin

[boutons_deux]

Rachel Maddow Terrifies Trump With Evidence That Cohen Could Bring Down His Children

Cohen was issued a subpoena (https://www.cnn.com/2018/08/22/politics/michael-cohen-trump-foundation-subpoena/index.html) as part of a probe into the Trump Foundation could spell more trouble not just for the president but for his children.

Maddow explained how eager Cohen was to respond to the subpoena and said the news “could end up being a very serious matter for not just Trump’s charity and the president himself but also for his three eldest children.”

Michael Cohen pled guilty to eight felonies yesterday. He’s out on bail today.

And that thing that started yesterday at almost exactly the same moment that Trump’s campaign chairman was being convicted of eight felonies.

Trump’s personal lawyer, Michael Cohen pleads guilty to eight felonies and he personally implicates the president in the criminal behavior to which he himself is pleading guilty,

that all started yesterday, but Michael Cohen’s still out on bail and so apparently it’s still unfolding today.

Again, in this lawsuit brought by the New York attorney general, that case is

brought against Trump’s foundation, Trump himself, and Ivanka, Don Jr. and Eric Trump.

They are all named explicitly in that case.

In the lawsuit, Barbara Underwood accuses Ivanka, Don Jr. and Eric of, quote, abdicating all responsibility for ensuring that the foundation’s assets were used in compliance with the law.

If that case is gonna become a criminal matter, and that’s what in process here, if it’s gonna be a criminal case and not just a civil lawsuit by the state of New York,

that could end up being a very serious matter for not just Trump’s charity and the president himself but also for his three eldest children.

We should also note because it’s a state’s case, there won’t be a way to pardon people

out of jeopardy in that case.

You can only pardon someone if you’re president for federal crimes.

https://www.politicususa.com/2018/08/22/maddow-trump-cohen-entire-family.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+politicususa%2FfJAl+%28Politi cus+USA+%29

[Chris]

1032500733764022272
1032502576304943105
1032503144477904897
1032503831068794881
1032504691756679168
1032506933448601600
1032507830463389697
1032508559328600064
1032508990410973184
1032509596835823616
1032520565859397632

[Pavlov]

So Cohen pleaded guilty to multiple felonies to pwn the Democrats with votes the Republicans already had.

lol another conspiracy

[ElNono]

lol walls of tweets nobody reads

[ElNono]

Chris angling for the spam, like Cosmoretard threads...

[djohn2oo8]

1032580710090072064

[djohn2oo8]

1032454885260840961

[djohn2oo8]

So Cohen pleaded guilty to multiple felonies to pwn the Democrats with votes the Republicans already had.

lol another conspiracy
That stupid piece of shit too dumb to realize the courts would not accept a guilty plea on false pretenses

[boutons_deux]

That stupid piece of shit too dumb to realize the courts would not accept a guilty plea on false pretenses

before a plea was presented to the court, the defendants lawyers wouldn't accept it if not credible and supported by evidence.

eg, "the law" shouldn't let a "fall guy" plead guilty, probably for compensation, to protect the actual perp. Evidence must accompany the plea

[boutons_deux]

wsj:

"The estrangement began over legal bills (https://www.wsj.com/articles/michael-cohen-wants-trump-to-pay-his-legal-fees-1529447136?mod=article_inline), said a person who has spoken with Mr. Cohen about the matter.

The Trump family covered part of Mr. Cohen’s legal fees after the raids, but then stopped paying.

Mr. Cohen felt exposed.

Public comments by Rudy Giuliani, :lol

Mr. Trump’s lawyer, put distance between the president and Mr. Cohen and further alienated the attorney, the person said."

So Trash stiffed yet another supplier, one among 1000s Trash has defrauded, and it may take down his Presidency."

yet another RUSSIAN! :lol

"Evgeny Naumovich Freidman (Russian (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_language): Евгений Наумович Фридман;[1] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gene_Freidman#cite_note-rusrek-1)), known as Gene Freidman,[2] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gene_Freidman#cite_note-nyt415-2) is a controversial Russian-American businessman "

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gene_Freidman

and Hilter lends a hand, too! :lol

Mr. Cohen’s father urged him not to protect the president, saying he didn’t survive the Holocaust to have his name sullied by Mr. Trump,

[Reck]

I’m actually tired of his dumbass ill-advised tweets. I’m equally tired of 500+ days of screech panels talking about muhRussia on cable news every night.

Why do you feel obligated to watch?

And what news channels are you watching? Fox is sure as fuck not broadcasting any Trump/Russia stories since this all started so you're safe in your bubble.

[Blake]

lol walls of tweets nobody reads

Including Chris

[Spurtacular]

TSA really got me with det one!

All his conspiracy fails disappeared!

#pizzagate

Clinton baby harvests

Uraniumania

All gone!

:lmao You're raving
:lmao #StillWithHer

[Spurtacular]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-SWZjpAgfJg

[baseline bum]

I’m actually tired of his dumbass ill-advised tweets. I’m equally tired of 500+ days of screech panels talking about muhRussia on cable news every night.

So you're more tired of the media reporting the collusion than the president engaging in it?

[Winehole23]

it's hard to get DarrinS to say anything positive about DJT. the key fact is his loathing for the other side.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/pops.12479

[DarrinS]

So you're more tired of the media reporting the collusion than the president engaging in it?

If there was any real evidence of collusion, Brennan would’ve already leaked it. :lol

[hater]

If there was any real evidence of collusion, Brennan would’ve already leaked it. :lol

Bingo

:lmao collusion

[hater]

So you're more tired of the media reporting the collusion than the president engaging in it?

What collusion? Explain in detail

[clambake]

seriously, who gives a shit about collusion.


follow the money.

[boutons_deux]

Cohen Wasn’t Alone: Records Suggest Others in Trump Circle Had Role in Hush Money Arrangements

indicates for the first time that others at Mr. Trump’s company had a role in the financial arrangements used to silence women who claimed that they had affairs with him, after the hush money payments were made.

Two senior Trump Organization executives had involvement

in the financial arrangements, according to the 22-page court filing.

Separately,

one or more members of the 2016 Trump campaign were cited

as having worked to identify stories about Mr. Trump’s romantic entanglements “so they could be purchased and their publication avoided,”

Mr. Cohen, the filing said, “coordinated with one or more members of the campaign, including through meetings and phone calls,” about the nature and timing of the payments, which were made to influence the election.

The court filing, which outlines campaign finance violations and other crimes to which Mr. Cohen pleaded guilty, traces

the reimbursement through the company.
It begins when Mr. Cohen requested it,

submitting a bank statement from a shell company he created to mask the payment’s connection to Mr. Trump, and

ends with the Trump Organization’s monthly disbursements to Mr. Cohen.

The reimbursement was processed using unusual accounting practices,

a nonexistent retainer agreement,

and equally unusual tax decisions,

helped along the way by Trump Organization executives who, it seemed, at best, looked the other way.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/22/nyregion/cohen-trump-organization-campaign-hush-money.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Wasn't Trash Org's CFO already questioned if not suboened?

[clambake]

flipping should be illegal, lol.

i suppose whistleblowers should be hung.

[Reck]

If there was any real evidence of collusion, Brennan would’ve already leaked it. :lol

You only care about illegality when someone you dont like steps in it.

You find everything else funny. we'll see how funny things get for your dear leader in the coming months.

[baseline bum]

If there was any real evidence of collusion, Brennan would’ve already leaked it. :lol

Uday already leaked it

[djohn2oo8]

So you're more tired of the media reporting the collusion than the president engaging in it?
Yep. Because Trumptards are going to have to deal with everything they accused Hillary of doing coming right back on that ass with Trump

[djohn2oo8]

If there was any real evidence of collusion, Brennan would’ve already leaked it. :lol
You seem eager to declare no collusion. Mueller hasn’t though :tu

[boutons_deux]

Not just misleading. Not merely false. A lie.

The first denial

that Donald Trump knew about hush-money payments to silence women came four days before he was elected president, when his spokeswoman Hope Hicks said, without hedging, “We have no knowledge of any of this.”

The second

came in January of this year, when his attorney Michael Cohen said the allegations were “outlandish.”

By March, two of the president’s spokesmen — Raj Shah and Sarah Huckabee Sanders — said publicly that Trump denied all the allegations and any payments.

Even Cohen’s attorney, David Schwartz, got in on the action, saying the president “was not aware of any of it.”

In April, Trump finally weighed in, answering a question about whether he knew about a payment to porn star
Stephanie Clifford, who uses the stage name Stormy Daniels, with a flat “no.”

It’s now clear that the president’s statement was a lie —

and that the people speaking for him repeated it.

One of the distinguishing characteristics of Donald Trump’s presidency has been his loose relationship with facts.

As of the beginning of this month, The Washington Post’s Fact Checker had

documented 4,229 false or misleading claim (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2018/08/01/president-trump-has-made-4229-false-or-misleading-claims-in-558-days/?utm_term=.c3f8bab4d059)s from the president —

an average of nearly 7.6 a day.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/08/23/not-just-misleading-not-merely-false-lie/?utm_term=.548ba7d33f87&wpisrc=nl_most&wpmm=1

Trash and his crime mafiya criminally LIED Trash into the White House, and

Trash KNEW Pootin/Assange was attacking Hillary

Trash is NOT an legitimate Pres

NOT MY PRESIDENT

[djohn2oo8]

1032660085003218945
lol Uday

[djohn2oo8]

1032668011948388353
ol boy gave up the goods

[Hillary Clinton]

1032668011948388353
ol boy gave up the goods

Can't get guuder than that.

[Reck]

1032668011948388353
ol boy gave up the goods

I wonder what con don thinks about this flipper.

[Guccifer 2.0]

Lol you fools! This is all part of the 19-D Chess/Backgammon hybrid strategy. We’re gonna drop a BOOM right up your asses!

[boutons_deux]

Immunity for Pecker? amazing

Do prosecutors already know what he knows, or are they gone fishin?

[djohn2oo8]

Immunity for Pecker? amazing

Do prosecutors already know what he knows, or are they gone fishin?
Well he gave them information that Trump knew about the payments and his involvement in them.

[boutons_deux]

Well he gave them information that Trump knew about the payments and his involvement in them.

... so why grant immunity now? well, maybe the immunity goes back many months

[djohn2oo8]

1032673855133900803

[Reck]

1032673855133900803

Impeachment imminent.

[djohn2oo8]

1032383478770294785

[Pavlov]

:lmao

Skip to 20 mins. Lanny Davis admitting they have no evidence of Trump instructing Cohen to make the payments besides Cohen’s word.

lying criminal Cohen to the witness stand please :rollinDavid Pecker to the witness stand, please.

https://media.giphy.com/media/iVqXV4vE4DDYk/giphy.gif

[Reck]

David Pecker to the witness stand, please.

https://media.giphy.com/media/iVqXV4vE4DDYk/giphy.gif

Crime isn't a crime, faggot.

HOW MANY TIMES MUST I REPEAT MY CONSPIRATARD SELF?

[baseline bum]

Impeachment imminent.

Yeah right. Trump could rape Cruz's wife live on national TV and Ryan would excuse it by saying he's new to this whole political game. Then Cruz would still ask him to come campaign for him.

[Reck]

Yeah right. Trump could rape Cruz's wife live on national TV and Ryan would excuse it by saying he's new to this whole political game. Then Cruz would still ask him to come campaign for him.

Of course by imminent I mean, democrats win the house, and then proceed from there.

Republicans have made it very clear they're not doing shit.

[djohn2oo8]

Yeah right. Trump could rape Cruz's wife live on national TV and Ryan would excuse it by saying he's new to this whole political game. Then Cruz would still ask him to come campaign for him.
Mueller gonna drop the national security indictments niggas will be shook.

[djohn2oo8]

1032676407187570688

[baseline bum]

Of course by imminent I mean, democrats win the house, and then proceed from there.

Republicans have made it very clear they're not doing shit.

Not happening without an utterly massive blue wave to give the Democrats the senate.

[baseline bum]

Mueller gonna drop the national security indictments niggas will be shook.

You're nuts putting any faith in the Trump party to impeach and convict Trump.

[djohn2oo8]

You're nuts putting any faith in the Trump party to impeach and convict Trump.
I don’t have faith in them. I believe in Mueller.

And :lmao Sessions basically just told Trump to go fuck himself

[boutons_deux]

Repugs impeached Dem Clinton

Dems impeached Repug Nixon

[baseline bum]

I don’t have faith in them. I believe in Mueller.

And :lmao Sessions basically just told Trump to go fuck himself

So what if Mueller finds crimes? That doesn't matter to the Trump party. They're already fine with Trump being able to pardon himself.

[djohn2oo8]

So what if Mueller finds crimes? That doesn't matter to the Trump party. They're already fine with Trump being able to pardon himself.
That’s the thing. This is all unprecedented. The question for decades is can you indict a sitting President? That’s going to be answered one way or another.

[Hillary Clinton]

So what if Mueller finds crimes? That doesn't matter to the Trump party. They're already fine with Trump being able to pardon himself.

Schtick sucks. :lol

[Blake]

Immunity for Pecker? amazing

Do prosecutors already know what he knows, or are they gone fishin?

Dunno, Pecker looks pretty cocksure in that photo.

[djohn2oo8]

“I’m not gonna answer this in the context of any current matters, so you shouldn’t draw any inference,” Rosenstein said. “The Department of Justice has in the past, when the issue arose, has opined that a sitting president cannot be indicted.”

interesting opening to that statement

[boutons_deux]

“I’m not gonna answer this in the context of any current matters, so you shouldn’t draw any inference,” Rosenstein said. “The Department of Justice has in the past, when the issue arose, has opined that a sitting president cannot be indicted.”

interesting opening to that statement

but SCOTUS ruled that Pres Clinton could be subpoened to appear before a grand jury, which is where Clinton lied, leading to Repugs impeaching, but not convicting.

I'm sure Mueller & Team could totally fuckup Trash in front of a grand jury.

[djohn2oo8]

but SCOTUS ruled that Pres Clinton could be subpoened to appear before a grand jury, which is where Clinton lied, leading to Repugs impeaching, but not convicting.

I'm sure Mueller & Team could totally fuckup Trash in front of a grand jury.
Yes he most definitely can be subpoenaed. We will see what route Mueller takes.

[djohn2oo8]

1032685411133472768

[Reck]

Schtick sucks. :lol

Not a schtick tbh. BB is a pessimist in this area.

I agree that the republicans won't do a thing but democrats are a whole different deal.

I think even without getting the senate they can impeach him with enough republicans. I may be wrong about this but there are enough republicans who hate Trump that can push the dems to the mark.

[djohn2oo8]

1032677658776281088

sessions vs trump

[baseline bum]

Not a schtick tbh. BB is a pessimist in this area.

I agree that the republicans won't do a thing but democrats are a whole different deal.

I think even without getting the senate they can impeach him with enough republicans. I may be wrong about this but there are enough republicans who hate Trump that can push the dems to the mark.

Flake, Corker, and McCain won't be in the senate next term.

[boutons_deux]

" ... not be improperly influenced by political considerations."

white male nationalism / supremacy and racism aren't "political" :lol

this dickless little jug-eared twerp is a lying, racist bastard.

[djohn2oo8]

1032677106491301894

[Reck]

Flake, Corker, and McCain won't be in the senate next term.

All seats that are toss up by most pollsters.

The dem running for Corker's seat has been leading in all the polls that have been taken. And I think the Flake seat, the dem running there is close.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2018/senate/tn/tennessee_senate_blackburn_vs_bredesen-6308.html
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2018/senate/az/arizona_senate_ward_vs_sinema-6300.html

Not bad.

[boutons_deux]

1032677106491301894

remember tranny Julie Annie also hinted at dirt on Hillary/Dems days before it was public knowledge

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/rudy-giuliani-admits-james-comey-fbi-letter-donald-trump-hillary-clinton

[baseline bum]

All seats that are toss up by most pollsters.

The dem running for Corker's seat has been leading in all the polls that have been taken. And I think the Flake seat, the dem running there is close.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2018/senate/tn/tennessee_senate_blackburn_vs_bredesen-6308.html
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2018/senate/az/arizona_senate_ward_vs_sinema-6300.html

Not bad.

Yeah but those are the only Republicans in the senate to come out against Trump.

[djohn2oo8]

1032690930275495936

[Pavlov]

1032690930275495936Lordy!

[djohn2oo8]

remember tranny Julie Annie also hinted at dirt on Hillary/Dems days before it was public knowledge

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/rudy-giuliani-admits-james-comey-fbi-letter-donald-trump-hillary-clinton
Yep. They all knew. And once it comes out that team trump paid the hackers to launch an attack on the United States. It’s over.

[djohn2oo8]

Lordy!
All these tapes

[djohn2oo8]

1032693684230402053

Boom!

[djohn2oo8]

1032693684230402053

Boom!
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/08/donald-trump-national-enquirer-allies-defect-david-pecker-michael-cohen/amp?__twitter_impression=true

straight from the article

[djohn2oo8]

1032697834628411394

[Reck]

Yeah but those are the only Republicans in the senate to come out against Trump.

The point is that those republican held seats could turn blue which would booster dems chances.

See, ever the pessimist. :lol

[Reck]

1032693684230402053

Boom!

I wonder what happens to the Enquirer now. Do they get pushed out of business for this?

[djohn2oo8]

I wonder what happens to the Enquirer now. Do they get pushed out of business for this?
Will be interesting to see. Also, imagine all the catch and kill stories the Enquirer squashed for Trump about to bust loose.

[baseline bum]

The point is that those republican held seats could turn blue which would booster dems chances.

See, ever the pessimist. :lol

A monstrously good performance would be the Democrats finishing with 51 senate seats, that's what a major blue wave would look like this election. Then you'd need 16 GOP senators to convict with all the never Trumpers gone. Unless he dies the earliest you're getting Trump out of office is January 2021.

[Pavlov]

A monstrously good performance would be the Democrats finishing with 51 senate seats, that's what a major blue wave would look like this election. Then you'd need 16 GOP senators to convict with all the never Trumpers gone. Unless he dies the earliest you're getting Trump out of office is January 2021.Yep, Trump's base is a cult. He is all they know and all they ever want to know.

[baseline bum]

Yep, Trump's base is a cult. He is all they know and all they ever want to know.

The only way it's happening is if you get an unprecedented wave election that scares the shit out of the GOP and makes them feel 2020 is hopeless being weighed down by Trump. Then you'd see a resignation and full pardon from Pence. But we'd be talking an election where Heitkamp, McCaskill, Donnely, Machin, Nelson, and Tester all hold their seats, both Arizona seats go blue, Bredesen takes Tennessee, Rosen takes Nevada, and then you see a shocker like Beto over Cruz. I'm not holding my breath on that happening.

And if that happens what's the upside for Pelosi to impeach? He'd be neutered by congress anyways.

[TSA]

1032677106491301894

:lol Lanny is the gift that keeps on giving. He’s already had to walk that back.

[TSA]

Cohen’s admission doesn’t mean Trump is guilty, legal experts say

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/08/23/cohen-trump-guilt-plea-admission-794069

on to the next attempt to take him out

[spurraider21]

Cohen’s admission doesn’t mean Trump is guilty, legal experts say

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/08/23/cohen-trump-guilt-plea-admission-794069

on to the next attempt to take him out
ah so criminal intent matters for trump. not for ding tho

[Pavlov]

Cohen’s admission doesn’t mean Trump is guilty, legal experts say

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/08/23/cohen-trump-guilt-plea-admission-794069

on to the next attempt to take him outYou're cheering for Trump's ignorance to protect him.

:lol TSA

[boutons_deux]

"far from rock-solid proof that the president is also guilty, even if Cohen is being entirely truthful, "

... say SOME lawyers, not ALL lawyers, and NO judges.

[RandomGuy]

You keep saying all this stuff in the dossier panned out. List it all right here.

Dossier Claim: Russia Meddled

Revelation: The U.S. intelligence apparatus concluded that Russia interfered in 2016’s election in a report released in January 2017. Though Steele’s name is not mentioned in that report, it does back up his reporting that Russia was actively interfering in the election process.

Dossier Claim: Russia Had Dirt on Clinton and DNC

Revelation: Much of the dossier is devoted not only to Trump but to Russia’s—specifically Putin’s—distaste for former Secretary of State Clinton. “Putin motivated by fear and hatred of Hillary Clinton,” one line of the dossier reads. Another line said: “The two sides had a mutual interest in defeating Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, whom President Putin apparently both hated and feared.”

Steele later cites one source as stating Russia that was behind the leak of hacked Democratic National Committee (DNC) emails to WikiLeaks.

The U.S. intelligence community confirmed not only that Russia had tried to meddle in the election but that it was the source of the hacked DNC emails released by WikiLeaks.

Dossier Claim: Putin Was in Charge

Revelation: On the very first page of the dossier, Steele explains that the election meddling was “endorsed by Putin” and that the effort was “both supported and directed” by him. The U.S. intelligence report reached the same conclusion, writing that Putin “ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the presidential election.” According to Steele’s sources, Putin and Russia had been cultivating Trump for “at least 5 years.”

Dossier Claim: Russian Diplomat Was a Spy

Revelation: Steele also claimed that Russia was worried a diplomat named Mikhail Kalugin was heavily involved in the meddling operation. Afraid he would be exposed, Russia pulled Kalugin out of Washington on “short notice.” Steele actually misspelled Kalugin’s name, but the U.S. government had identified Kalugin as a Russian spy, the BBC reported in March.

Dossier Claim: Page Met With Russians

Revelation: Carter Page previously denied having met with Russian government officials during his trip to Russia in July 2016, but he admitted to the meeting while speaking to the House Intelligence Committee last November. Page was a foreign policy adviser to Trump’s campaign and in June 2016 delivered a speech in Washington praising Putin. And as early as September 2016, U.S. officials were looking into Page’s contacts in Russia, Yahoo News reported.

Dossier Claim: Manafort Received Payment for Work in Ukraine

Revelation: Paul Manafort, who is facing serious charges from Mueller’s team, worked extensively in Ukraine for years before Trump hired him as campaign chairman in 2016. The longtime Washington lobbyist received $12.7 million from the political party of former pro-Russia Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych between 2007 and 2012, The New York Times reported on August 14, 2016. Manafort resigned from the campaign after that report.

Steele’s dossier states that Yanukovych and Putin met the day after the story broke, and the former made assurances to the latter that no trail could be found.

[RandomGuy]

Cohen’s admission doesn’t mean Trump is guilty, legal experts say

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/08/23/cohen-trump-guilt-plea-admission-794069

on to the next attempt to take him out

So Trump isn't evil, he's just an idiot.

Got it.

[RandomGuy]

Yep, Trump's base is a cult. He is all they know and all they ever want to know.

I don't think there is really any other word for it at this point.


cult
kəlt/Submit
noun
a system of religious veneration and devotion directed toward a particular figure or object.
"the cult of St. Olaf"
a relatively small group of people having religious beliefs or practices regarded by others as strange or sinister.
"a network of Satan-worshiping cults"
synonyms: sect, denomination, group, movement, church, persuasion, body, faction
"a religious cult"
a misplaced or excessive admiration for a particular person or thing.

[spurraider21]

So Cohen pleaded guilty to multiple felonies to pwn the Democrats with votes the Republicans already had.

lol another conspiracy
:lmao

[baseline bum]

So Cohen pleaded guilty to multiple felonies to pwn the Democrats with votes the Republicans already had.

lol another conspiracy

:lmao

[Pavlov]

:lmao

:lmao

1032741369536638976

[djohn2oo8]

1032751935567405056

[djohn2oo8]

No wonder he got immunity

[TSA]

ah so criminal intent matters for trump. not for ding tho

:lol today’s lawyers

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/52/30109

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793

[djohn2oo8]

:lmao :rollin

[Pavlov]

:lol TSA reduced to proclaiming Trump is too stupid to know he broke the law after talking to his lawyer.

[spurraider21]

:lol today’s lawyers

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/52/30109

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793
use your words TSA.

comey - we shouldn't prosecute clinton because we couldnt find she had criminal intent
you - trump is innocent because he didnt know it was illegal

[TSA]

use your words TSA.

comey - we shouldn't prosecute clinton because we couldnt find she had criminal intent
you - trump is innocent because he didnt know it was illegal

In my own words? You’re a lawyer who’s ignorant of the laws even after having them spoon fed to you.

Hillary—no intent needed to convict
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793

Trump—intent needed to convict
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/52/30109

:lol today’s lawyers

[TSA]

:lol Lanny is the gift that keeps on giving. He’s already had to walk that back.

1032448438993137664

1032450981349535744

1032451818205396993

[Spurminator]

Never thought I'd see a celebrity that the National Enquirer would buy stories about just to NOT publish them, nor a leader that InfoWars conspiracy theorists would trust implicitly. Yet we have both with one man.

[Pavlov]

In my own words? You’re a lawyer who’s ignorant of the laws even after having them spoon fed to you.

Hillary—no intent needed to convict
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793

Trump—intent needed to convict
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/52/30109

:lol today’s lawyersSo what is stopping Trump from indicting Hillary, TSA?

[spurraider21]

In my own words? You’re a lawyer who’s ignorant of the laws even after having them spoon fed to you.

Hillary—no intent needed to convict
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793

Trump—intent needed to convict
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/52/30109

:lol today’s lawyers

Our investigation looked at whether there is evidence classified information was improperly stored or transmitted on that personal system, in violation of a federal statute making it a felony to mishandle classified information either intentionally or in a grossly negligent way, or a second statute making it a misdemeanor to knowingly remove classified information from appropriate systems or storage facilities.


Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before bringing charges. There are obvious considerations, like the strength of the evidence, especially regarding intent. Responsible decisions also consider the context of a person’s actions, and how similar situations have been handled in the past.

In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here.

[TSA]

Our investigation looked at whether there is evidence classified information was improperly stored or transmitted on that personal system, in violation of a federal statute making it a felony to mishandle classified information either intentionally OR in a grossly negligent way, or a second statute making it a misdemeanor to knowingly remove classified information from appropriate systems or storage facilities.

f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793


“Electronic records show Peter Strzok, who led the investigation of Hillary Clinton's private email server as the No. 2 official in the counterintelligence division, changed Comey's earlier draft language describing Clinton's actions as "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless," the sources said.”
https://www.cnn.com/2017/12/04/politics/peter-strzok-james-comey/index.html

:lol today’s lawyers quoting Comey

[Pavlov]

f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793


“Electronic records show Peter Strzok, who led the investigation of Hillary Clinton's private email server as the No. 2 official in the counterintelligence division, changed Comey's earlier draft language describing Clinton's actions as "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless," the sources said.”
https://www.cnn.com/2017/12/04/politics/peter-strzok-james-comey/index.html

:lol today’s lawyers quoting Comey


So what is stopping Trump from indicting Hillary, TSA?

[Chris]

:lol today’s lawyers quoting Comey

crofl

[spurraider21]

f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793


“Electronic records show Peter Strzok, who led the investigation of Hillary Clinton's private email server as the No. 2 official in the counterintelligence division, changed Comey's earlier draft language describing Clinton's actions as "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless," the sources said.”
https://www.cnn.com/2017/12/04/politics/peter-strzok-james-comey/index.html

:lol today’s lawyers quoting Comey
yes, that was included in the section i quoted, thanks

as for the CNN article (CNN good now)... you left out the very next stanza


The drafting process was a team effort, CNN is told, with a handful of people reviewing the language as edits were made, according to another US official familiar with the matter.

and of course, further down...


CNN reported in November (http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/07/politics/james-comey-hillary-clinton-grassley/index.html) that Comey and his FBI colleagues were "playing with the language" throughout the process of drafting Comey's statement on Clinton, believing that they needed to condemn the former secretary of state's handling of classified information, while also making clear they would not recommend criminal charges, according to a source familiar with the FBI decision.


those changes were made after they had already determined they wouldn't be pressing charges. its ludicrous to imply that strzok managed to sneak in some language without any approval and only as a result of those edits, they didnt press charges

[Spurminator]

:lol Today's 4chan conspiracy theorists using Derp schtick

[TSA]

yes, that was included in the section i quoted, thanks

as for the CNN article (CNN good now)... you left out the very next stanza



and of course, further down...



those changes were made after they had already determined they wouldn't be pressing charges. its ludicrous to imply that strzok managed to sneak in some language without any approval and only as a result of those edits, they didnt press charges

“(1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed”

“OR in a grossly negligent way”

does the above require intent to convict yes or no?

The answer is no. You stepped on your own dick and look foolish continuing this any further.

Once again

Hillary—no intent needed to convict
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793

Trump—intent needed to convict
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/52/3

:lol today’s lawyers

[Pavlov]

lol today's produce salesmen calling out today's lawyers


So what is stopping Trump from indicting Hillary, TSA?

[djohn2oo8]

Gotta wonder what’s stopping TSA from making threads about this stuff like he used to

[djohn2oo8]

Guess the Q thread, pizzagate thread and guccifer thread left a scar

[Reck]

Don’t you just love it when a non lawyer guy tries to act like he knows more than an actual lawyer through random articles posted from other experts?

I’m not a lawyer but I know more than you and I’ll show you how by posting non original thoughts from other people’s work.

use your own words TSA.

[Pavlov]

Well we've found the question TSA will dodge whenever he brings up....

https://afinde-production.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/2237a4a4-2a77-4c40-8053-a47c4d8b5425.jpg

[spurraider21]

“(1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed”

“OR in a grossly negligent way”

does the above require intent to convict yes or no?

The answer is no. You stepped on your own dick and look foolish continuing this any further.

Once again

Hillary—no intent needed to convict
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793

Trump—intent needed to convict
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/52/3

:lol today’s lawyers
i haven't disagreed with the code :lol... not sure why you keep re-posting them.

the fbi chose not to recommend charges against clinton because they said they lacked evidence of criminal intent. that's all i'm saying. and if the trump/sessions DOJ thinks they should go after her because they can instead prove gross negligence, they've been more than welcome to, and have opted against it.

[ElNono]

:lol today's conspiracy theorists

[spurraider21]

Don’t you just love it when a non lawyer guy tries to act like he knows more than an actual lawyer through random articles posted from other experts?

I’m not a lawyer but I know more than you and I’ll show you how by posting non original thoughts from other people’s work.

use your own words TSA.
it's honestly not that big a deal if you're a lawyer or not. the code is the code.

i will say though, you dont spend law school memorizing a bunch of statutes and codes. i mean, you learn a great deal of the evidence code and code of civil procedure, but thats really about it. other than that you mainly learn common law, broader doctrines, and key case law

[Pavlov]

it's honestly not that big a deal if you're a lawyer or not. the code is the code.

i will say though, you dont spend law school memorizing a bunch of statutes and codes. i mean, you learn a great deal of the evidence code and code of civil procedure, but thats really about it. other than that you mainly learn common law, broader doctrines, and key case lawYep. Anyone honest attorney would tell you that case is a fucking dog.

You can count on three former Secretaries of State to testify for the defense just for starters. No jury would ever unanimously agree to send Hillary to prison over some emails.

[baseline bum]

Well we've found the question TSA will dodge whenever he brings up....

https://afinde-production.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/2237a4a4-2a77-4c40-8053-a47c4d8b5425.jpg

:rollin

[djohn2oo8]

1032799693846265857


ooooooooooweeeeeeeeee

[djohn2oo8]

1032805972903964672

[djohn2oo8]

1032803993666367488

[djohn2oo8]

Guess TSA can’t whine about the Clinton Foundation like he used to

[Winehole23]

what's to stop him now?

[boutons_deux]

Trump Suggests Cooperating With Prosecutors Should Be A Crime

The president continued to lambaste longtime personal attorney Michael Cohen in an interview with his favorite cable news show, “Fox & Friends.”

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trump-fox-and-friends-interview-michael-cohen_us_5b7ea9a8e4b0729515107f8d?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=__TheMorningEmail__082418&utm_content=__TheMorningEmail__082418+CID_7f10f360 5d2e46a8150adbcd36f62c34&utm_source=Email%20marketing%20software&utm_term=HuffPost&ncid=newsltushpmgnews__TheMorningEmail__082418

What Trash really means is the "flipping" only against Trash should be illegal.

[Blake]

"NEW YORK (AP) — Michael Cohen is sticking his hand out and asking the public for help paying for his legal defense, and one anonymous donor already has ponied up $50,000..?."

Lol trump lawyer needing a gofundme account

[Reck]

"NEW YORK (AP) — Michael Cohen is sticking his hand out and asking the public for help paying for his legal defense, and one anonymous donor already has ponied up $50,000..?."

Lol trump lawyer needing a gofundme account

3...2..1 before a Soros DING*.

[djohn2oo8]

1033006038667198464

[djohn2oo8]

1033009862484152320

[TSA]

1033002733236838400
:rollin

[djohn2oo8]

1033014871565258752

[djohn2oo8]

1033017385777876992

[RandomGuy]

Don’t you just love it when a non lawyer guy tries to act like he knows more than an actual lawyer through random articles posted from other experts?

I’m not a lawyer but I know more than you and I’ll show you how by posting non original thoughts from other people’s work.

use your own words TSA.

Random articles... are not necessarily invalid ones. :D

[RandomGuy]

1033009862484152320

Weisselberg will be the next "get" from Cohen. I would be shocked if his phone wasn't being tapped and emails monitored right now.

[Reck]

1033002733236838400
:rollin

Why are you laughing?

Cohen is already a doomed man. The mere fact 2 other close Trump people have flipped on him on back to back days renders Cohen inert.

Pecker has more damaging information on Trump.
His finance guy who also flipped has even more damaging information.

But I guess it's a good thing you're flexing those jaw muscles now. You ain't gonna be laughing much later.

[Blake]

Why are you laughing?

Desperately clinging to Lanny for forced lols

[Pavlov]

Tough week for TSA. It was cute watching him try to earn his JD in a message board debate though.

That's how it works, right?

[Chris]

1033196266258350082

[djohn2oo8]

1033196266258350082
Cohen already guilty dumbass

[Blake]

1033196266258350082

Who cares about the DA wife's firm unless you're in complete desperation mode.

[DMX7]

lol, Chris is reaching hard now.

[Reck]

But CONFLICT!

[TSA]

Weisselberg will be the next "get" from Cohen. I would be shocked if his phone wasn't being tapped and emails monitored right now.

1033330789453320192

:lol you’re such a fucking idiot

[Reck]

TSA calling anyone an idiot. :lol

[djohn2oo8]

TSA calling anyone an idiot. :lol
But he pleaded guilty to crimes that are not crimes

[boutons_deux]

Weisselberg gets NARROW immunity to testify against Cohen

meaning NO IMMUNITY for crimes he may have committed for, testifying against Trash.

so-called, self-proclaimed-non-political JeBo now going after Cohen's wife (no doubt as DEMANDED by vengeful Trash) ? :lol

[Blake]

1033330789453320192

:lol you’re such a fucking idiot

Weisselberg plea deal watch

[Cuck Ross]

1033372982901657601

[boutons_deux]

a rightwingnutjob and Trash supporter, maybe even a cuckhold, whines about Other People's Integrity? :lol

[Cuck Ross]

1033353673395429377

[Reck]

1033353673395429377

:lol calling his own father by his last name.

I sense detachment. :lol

[Cuck Ross]

1033417290258075648

[boutons_deux]

whatabout Fox? famous for its many retractions and scrupulous reporting and commentariat

[Cuck Ross]

whatabout Fox? famous for its many retractions and scrupulous reporting and commentariat

1033382568899407872

[Spurminator]

:lol calling his own father by his last name.

I sense detachment. :lol

It really is weird.

[Chris]

:lol calling his own father by his last name.

I sense detachment. :lol

Yeah because everyone calls their father by their first name and everyone refers to POTUS as Donald you dumb fuck.

[Chris]

It really is weird.

Another dumb fuck.

[Pavlov]

Yeah because everyone calls their father by their first name and everyone refers to POTUS as Donald you dumb fuck.Do you call your dad by his last name, Chris?