Manafort drops one challenge to Mueller charge

[ducks]

https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/21/politics/manafort-challenge-criminal-charge/index.html

t Manafort dropped Monday initially asked the court to throw out one charge -- alleging he failed to disclose to the Treasury Department foreign bank accounts worth more than $10,000 in 2011 -- because its five-year statute of limitations expired.

Proof it is a witch hunt
Trying to hard and then said my bad I made a bad mistake

[Spurminator]

I don't think this article says what you think it says.

[boutons_deux]

:lol ducks

[Pavlov]

https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/21/politics/manafort-challenge-criminal-charge/index.html

t Manafort dropped Monday initially asked the court to throw out one charge -- alleging he failed to disclose to the Treasury Department foreign bank accounts worth more than $10,000 in 2011 -- because its five-year statute of limitations expired.

Proof it is a witch hunt
Trying to hard and then said my bad I made a bad mistakeYeah, this one's a win for the good guys, meaning Mueller's team.

They caught Manafort's lawyers a little flat footed, but it's clear they never disclose anything unless they have to.

[Spurtacular]

Yeah, this one's a win for the good guys, meaning Mueller's team.

They caught Manafort's lawyers a little flat footed, but it's clear they never disclose anything unless they have to.

:lmao #StillWithHer

[hater]

:lmao #StillWithHer

:lmao

[Chris]

Yeah, this one's a win for the good guys, meaning Mueller's team.

They caught Manafort's lawyers a little flat footed, but it's clear they never disclose anything unless they have to.

Mueller was the one who was flatfooted when he asked for more time once he realized the Russians were going to challenge his ham sandwich theory. :lol

[Pavlov]

:lmao #StillWithHer:lol she has nothing to do with Manafort's trial but thanks for letting everyone know she's living rent free in your head.


:lmao:lol still playing both sides of every issue


Mueller was the one who was flatfooted when he asked for more time once he realized the Russians were going to challenge his ham sandwich theory. :lolCould you point me to an actual ruling on that issue, Chris?

[hater]

Mueller was the one who was flatfooted when he asked for more time once he realized the Russians were going to challenge his ham sandwich theory. :lol

:lol

[Pavlov]

:lol:lol you have no idea what he's even talking about.

[djohn2oo8]

:lol you have no idea what he's even talking about.

lol

[monosylab1k]

:lol you have no idea what he's even talking about.

:lol

[Spurtacular]

she has nothing to do with Manafort's trial


It's all about her and everything she "stood for". Paying all these millions for a witch hunt because you can't stand that your fag hag lost and you're desperately searching for excuses.

:lol

[Pavlov]

It's all about her and everything she "stood for". Paying all these millions for a witch hunt because you can't stand that your fag hag lost and you're desperately searching for excuses.

:lol
She doesn't stand for Manafort's trial.

:lmao

[Spurtacular]

She doesn't stand for Manafort's trial.

:lmao

Show me that link.

[ElNono]

lol op

[Pavlov]

Show me that link.What are you babbling about now?

[Spurtacular]

What are you babbling about now?

:lol "Can't back up your claim"
:lol And a babbling retort for four words.

[Pavlov]

:lol "Can't back up your claim"
What link are you demanding?

[Spurtacular]

What link are you demanding?

I demand nothing. :lol that you cannot live up to the standard that you've thrown many a tantrums over, though.

[Pavlov]

I demand nothing. :lol that you cannot live up to the standard that you've thrown many a tantrums over, though.

What link are you demanding?

Use your words.

[Spurtacular]

What link?

Use your words.

Show us how Hillary doesn't stand for Manafort's trial. That's a rather bold claim.

[Pavlov]

Show us how Hillary doesn't stand for Manafort's trial. That's a rather bold claim.
Demanding I prove a negative about your failed attempt at symbolism?

:lol

[Spurtacular]

Demanding I prove a negative about your failed attempt at symbolism?

:lol

You claimed that Hillary does not stand for Manafort's trial. So, you're saying you have nothing to based that on. Got it.

[Pavlov]

You claimed that Hillary does not stand for Manafort's trial. So, you're saying you have nothing to based that on. Got it. You're the only person in the world who has tried to link the two.

Burden is on you.

lol

[Spurtacular]

You're the only person in the world who has tried to link the two.

Burden is on you.

lol


She doesn't stand for Manafort's trial.


So, you're pretending you didnt' make this claim. Got it.

[Pavlov]

So, you're pretending you didnt' make this claim. Got it.

I refuted your claim, genius.

Burden is on you.

[Spurtacular]

I refuted your claim, genius.

Burden is on you.

:lol You refuted my claim by making an unsubstantiated counter claim?
:lol This is why you constantly think your L's are W's.

[Pavlov]

:lol You refuted my claim by making an unsubstantiated counter claim?
:lol This is why you constantly think your L's are W's.:lol you made the claim

Your burden of proof.

[Spurtacular]

:lol you made the claim

Your burden of proof.

You made a false claim as you would say.

[Pavlov]

You made a false claim as you would say.I refuted your false claim.

Any time you want to actually prove your claim -- no one is stopping you.

[SpursforSix]

Has boutons used "Manafart" yet?

[Spurtacular]

I refuted your false claim.

Any time you want to actually prove your claim -- no one is stopping you.


She (Hillary) doesn't stand for Manafort's trial.



Your claim is a stand-alone claim regardless of whether or not it is a refutation.

You can either back it up, or it's bull shit. Chump Logic 101.

So, is the claim bull shit, or is the Chump Logic bullshit? Pick one.

[Pavlov]

Your claim is a stand-alone claim regardless of whether or not it is a refutation.

You can either back it up, or it's bull shit. Chump Logic 101.

So, is the claim bull shit, or is the Chump Logic bullshit? Pick one.Nope, I just refuted your bullshit claim that Hillary has something to do with Manafort's trial.

Feel free to prove she does.

lol

[Spurtacular]

Nope, I just refuted your bullshit claim that Hillary has something to do with Manafort's trial.

Feel free to prove she does.

lol

You made a claim and you won't back it up. We see that all your cries to back up claims with links is bull shit. I said this all along.

[Pavlov]

You made a claim and you won't back it up. We see that all your cries to back up claims with links is bull shit. I said this all along.

:lol I said your claim is bullshit. You failed to back it up and now you're demanding I prove a negative.

Really all the proof I need is your failure and resulting whine fit.

[Spurtacular]

:lol I said your claim is bullshit. You failed to back it up and now you're demanding I prove a negative.

Really all the proof I need is your failure and resulting whine fit.

You made a claim and you won't back it up. I called you on this many of times all along, phony. Next time you snap your fingers and demand links, remember that you don't even believe in your own bull shit, bruh.

[Chucho]

Has boutons used "Manafart" yet?

Heehee.

Also, thank you for breaking up yet another faggy Chump/Derp exchange. The change of pace was needed.

[AaronY]

:lol you have no idea what he's even talking about.
Is it gonna be literally World War Three?!?!!?

cuz hater knows about that when it happens each and every week

[AaronY]

Been so many World War Threes already im beginning to lose count tbh

I think we are on the fifth World War Three now iirc

[pgardn]

Send this guy to jai now. Pretty sure this one just popped up. If not my apologies.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/04/us/politics/paul-manafort-mueller-witness-tampering.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news

What a dumb fck
The idiot just stuck a fork in the light socket.
Toast.

[pgardn]

Good call ducks.

[pgardn]

Guardian has it now as well.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/jun/05/paul-manafort-tampering-with-witnesses-say-mueller-investigators

Good luck with ending the investigation Donald...

[pgardn]

During a press conference at the White House, Trump called Manafort "a respected man" and dismissed questions about reports of Manafort's ties to foreign political parties or governments.

Before Mueller

I pick the best people to work for me, everybody says so...

[Pavlov]

Guardian has it now as well.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/jun/05/paul-manafort-tampering-with-witnesses-say-mueller-investigators

Good luck with ending the investigation Donald...

In a court filing on Monday, prosecutors working for the special counsel Robert Mueller, who is investigating possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, said Manafort and an associate “repeatedly” attempted to contact witnesses using his phone and an encrypted messaging application. They allege it happened shortly after a grand jury returned a new indictment against him, violating the terms of his house arrest.Good Lord could they be any more up in his shit?

He better be praying for Dennison to pardon him.