PDA

View Full Version : Trump calls Theresa May a school mistress will not meet with her at G7



hater
06-07-2018, 06:06 PM
Donald Trump has grown frustrated with Theresa May’s “school mistress” tone, allies of the president have told The Telegraph, as it emerged the pair will not hold formal talks at the G7 summit in Canada.

The US president is said to bristle at the Prime Minister’s approach during phone calls, with Mrs May quick to get into policy details rather than wider conversation.

One senior US diplomat said Mr Trump had expressed annoyance at Mrs May’s frequent demands, which are seen as taking advantage of the UK-US relationship.

Another long-time friend of the president revealed he had privately complained of how Mrs May calls him out in public when he is deemed to have stepped out of line.

hater
06-07-2018, 06:07 PM
:lmao Teres:lol M:loly

:lmao

:lmao “special relationship” between uk and us :lol

:lmao P:lolrt:loln Jh:lolns:loln

Chris
06-07-2018, 06:07 PM
Sharia May not too popular with the Brits these days.

Winehole23
06-07-2018, 06:14 PM
Emo Trump isn't very good at this.

Winehole23
06-07-2018, 06:14 PM
So thin skinned

hater
06-07-2018, 06:17 PM
I actually like he forgets dipomacy and “my allies” bullshit and tells it how it is

Refreshing

Dump is a class A moron hut his honesty, I love :lmao

hater
06-07-2018, 06:18 PM
Obama wpuld have said some shit like May reminds him of his grandma :lmao

Winehole23
06-07-2018, 06:19 PM
people empathize with emo Trump, true

Reck
06-07-2018, 06:19 PM
Trump is going to come out bruised from the G7 summit.

They're going to exclude the USA from any deal and will make their own. Big dick Macron laid it on Trump on twitter of all places. :lol

1004812693348511751

boutons_deux
06-07-2018, 07:41 PM
"Mrs May quick to get into policy details rather than wider conversation"

Trash? "policy details"? :lol

"wider conversation" is Trash bullshitting, making up stuff, lying,

I read that Trash doesn't want to go to G7/Canada at all, detracts from his "preparation" to meet NK dude :lol

I read also Trash is not even attending the NK prep/policy meetings.

I really hope the other G7 reps give Trash an extremely hard time, he deserves it, watch him fold and/or lash out for being exposed as dumb, ignorant, unprepared, compared to serious people. I supposed C-Span won't have 100% of the shit show.

Expect Trash to position his obese ass front and center in group photos.

boutons_deux
06-07-2018, 07:44 PM
Trump complains about traveling to Canada ahead of Singapore summit with Kim

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-complains-about-traveling-to-canada-ahead-of-singapore-summit-with-kim/2018/06/06/651d8dd8-69be-11e8-9e38-24e693b38637_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.a75cccca8672&wpisrc=nl_most&wpmm=1

:lol

pgardn
06-07-2018, 08:50 PM
I actually like he forgets dipomacy and “my allies” bullshit and tells it how it is

Refreshing

Dump is a class A moron hut his honesty, I love :lmao

You love that Trump loves Putin’s nipples.
So.... Yeah. That’s odd.

SnakeBoy
06-07-2018, 11:07 PM
Trump is going to come out bruised from the G7 summit.

They're going to exclude the USA from any deal and will make their own. Big dick Macron laid it on Trump on twitter of all places. :lol

1004812693348511751

Macron is just mad his schmoozing didn't work. Germany and Japan won't stick by his side if this gets ugly. Germany in particular will fold faster than Obama did on a public option.

ducks
06-07-2018, 11:45 PM
Sounds like that bitch needs a solid spanking

clambake
06-07-2018, 11:49 PM
Sounds like that bitch needs a solid spanking

nice english

Spurtacular
06-08-2018, 12:44 AM
Trump is going to come out bruised from the G7 summit.

They're going to exclude the USA from any deal and will make their own. Big dick Macron laid it on Trump on twitter of all places. :lol

1004812693348511751

:lmao Today's tranny

http://www2.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/Emmanuel+Macron+City+Aachen+Awards+Charlemagne+Rzt SbKUWjdjl.jpg

boutons_deux
06-09-2018, 03:50 PM
Macron, Trudeau Say They Weren’t Going to Tell Trump Where G-7 After Party Was

https://media.newyorker.com/photos/5b1ad8342acbf821b1b74c7b/master/w_1298,c_limit/Borowitz-TrumpG7Invite.jpg

LA MALBAIE, CANADA —

Saying that they were “tremendously relieved” that Donald J. Trump is leaving the G-7 summit early,

the leaders of France and Canada said on Friday that they had been planning not to tell Trump the location of the G-7 after party.

Speaking to reporters, Emmanuel Macron and Justin Trudeau said that

there had been “total consensus” among non-U.S. participants to withhold information about the time, place, and existence of an after party from Trump.

“The plan was, if Trump asked about an after party, we were going to be, like, ‘Ask Angela Merkel,’ ” Macron said.

“Angela was going to totally stonewall him.”

Merkel confirmed that she had planned to tell Trump that she “didn’t think anyone was planning to do anything” after the summit and steadfastly to deny “hearing anything” about an after party.

“I would have had no problem lying to him, despite our two countries going way back, to D-Day or whenever,”

Merkel said, rolling her eyes.

Trudeau said that the after party will proceed as scheduled when the G-7 concludes, on Saturday, adding,

“Now that Trump is out of here, we’ll really have something to celebrate.”


https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/macron-trudeau-say-they-werent-going-to-tell-trump-where-g-7-afterparty-was (https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/macron-trudeau-say-they-werent-going-to-tell-trump-where-g-7-afterparty-was)

koriwhat
06-09-2018, 08:41 PM
Trump is going to come out bruised from the G7 summit.

They're going to exclude the USA from any deal and will make their own. Big dick Macron laid it on Trump on twitter of all places. :lol

1004812693348511751

yes! fuck them all! let's see them all survive without the USA. fuck yes!

Reck
06-09-2018, 08:56 PM
yes! fuck them all! let's see them all survive without the USA. fuck yes!

You have all the makings of inbreeding written all over you.

ducks
06-09-2018, 09:41 PM
So yes, when President Trump confronts the failures of the “rules-based international order” directly, after decades of pusillanimous acquiescence by his predecessors, you could describe that as “unprecedented.”

But doing things that are “unprecedented” is the very definition of Donald Trump’s mandate. That’s what he was elected to do. To shake things up. To change things. When you do something new, it is unprecedented. That’s literally what it means.

And yet the elites throw around that word “unprecedented” as a criticism. Nothing could be more revealing of their true beliefs: they actually loved the old order because they and their rich friends benefited from it. How disgraceful that they howl in protest when President Trump finally puts working people first.

koriwhat
06-09-2018, 11:16 PM
You have all the makings of inbreeding written all over you.

too bad you couldn't be further from the truth mr/mrs fuckedinthehead. don't you have a drag show to attend somewhere tonight?

koriwhat
06-09-2018, 11:17 PM
So yes, when President Trump confronts the failures of the “rules-based international order” directly, after decades of pusillanimous acquiescence by his predecessors, you could describe that as “unprecedented.”

But doing things that are “unprecedented” is the very definition of Donald Trump’s mandate. That’s what he was elected to do. To shake things up. To change things. When you do something new, it is unprecedented. That’s literally what it means.

And yet the elites throw around that word “unprecedented” as a criticism. Nothing could be more revealing of their true beliefs: they actually loved the old order because they and their rich friends benefited from it. How disgraceful that they howl in protest when President Trump finally puts working people first.

they don't get it. they're fucking idiots.

Winehole23
06-10-2018, 03:08 AM
So yes, when President Trump confronts the failures of the “rules-based international order” directly, after decades of pusillanimous acquiescence by his predecessors, you could describe that as “unprecedented.”

But doing things that are “unprecedented” is the very definition of Donald Trump’s mandate. That’s what he was elected to do. To shake things up. To change things. When you do something new, it is unprecedented. That’s literally what it means.

And yet the elites throw around that word “unprecedented” as a criticism. Nothing could be more revealing of their true beliefs: they actually loved the old order because they and their rich friends benefited from it. How disgraceful that they howl in protest when President Trump finally puts working people first.who parrots the MSM?

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2018/06/09/steve-hilton-trump-s-criticism-g-7-is-unprecedented-scream-elite-that-s-whole-point-trump.html

boutons_deux
06-10-2018, 01:13 PM
The world expects so little from all y'all's piece of shit sicko Pres

European leaders are indignant and defiant over Trump’s G-7 statement. But they’re not surprised.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/resizer/kQNwrQXMr__bdop9gq8nBoVhli4=/1484x0/arc-anglerfish-washpost-prod-washpost.s3.amazonaws.com/public/MT67WSDMYYI6RP4GUI2RWXWOTE.jpg

BERLIN — It was an image that, in its Rockwellian presentation and characters, seemed to capture an emerging era.

European leaders stood arrayed on one side of a narrow conference room table, leaning in. On the other side:

President Trump, seated alone, his arms folded.
The photo (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2018/06/09/the-g-7-summit-summed-up-in-one-photo/?utm_term=.c91626c452d1), released Saturday on German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s Instagram account and later tweeted by Trump national security advisor John Bolton, fast became a Rorschach test for an increasingly troubled relationship.

Trump was clearly isolated. But was he making an overdue stand against an expiring global order? Or was he just the odd man out in the world’s most powerful club?

The enchantingly unreadable facial expressions make it impossible to know.

On the day after the Group of Seven summit blew up in spectacular fashion (https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/trump-floats-end-to-all-tariffs-threatens-major-penalties-for-countries-that-dont-agree/2018/06/09/a06350be-6bf1-11e8-bea7-c8eb28bc52b1_story.html?utm_term=.5c3b53272dde),

with Trump using idle time on an airport runway to insult his host and repudiate an agreement he had made with allied leaders only hours earlier,

emotions were far easier to divine.

Allies were indignant. They were defiant. Yet they were hardly shocked by the outcome of a critical global gathering that had gone worse than any that longtime foreign policy players had seen.

“The president acted and reacted in the childish way he could be expected to.” :lol

"International cooperation cannot be dictated by fits of anger and throwaway remarks,” the statement said.

“Let's be serious and worthy of our people.” :lol Not Trash, he ain't worth of nothing.

For many in Europe, the question now is how best to preserve any kind of multilateral cooperation.

Dealing with Trump’s whims and last-minute changes of mind has proven a strategic nightmare.

“How is it possible to work this way if once you have agreed to something,

two hours later the guy decides he doesn’t agree with what he agreed with?”

Trump’s choice to abandon the G-7 communique was announced in a pair of tweets as he prepared to lift off early from the two-day summit in Quebec City.

The decision – which came with

an attack on Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for being “weak and dishonest”

-- directly contradicted an announcement by Trudeau minutes earlier in which he declared that all seven member-states had signed the joint statement.

In that announcement, Trudeau had said the summit was “very successful,”

but he also said Canada would retaliate against metals tariffs that had been aimed at allies.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/european-leaders-are-outraged-by-trump-over-g-7-statement-but-theyre-not-surprised/2018/06/10/e7f54887-9022-4adb-9fb1-092c33cb3e91_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.509ef1939542

Pootin is LAFFING his murderous, corrupt ass off.

His Manchurian Candidate / Traitor Trash is fucking up the Western Alliance, just as Pootin wants.

Pootin can't lift up his backward, bankrupt, primitive shithole country so he strategizes tearing down the industrial countries way ahead of his shithole Russia.

spurraider21
06-10-2018, 01:15 PM
:lmao Today's tranny
derpy still fantasizing tbh

boutons_deux
06-10-2018, 01:35 PM
Trudeau 'stabbed us in back' on trade, says Trump chief economic adviser

Donald’s Trump’s chief economic adviser said the US pulled out of a G7 communique because the Canadian prime minister, Justin Trudeau (https://www.theguardian.com/world/justin-trudeau), “stabbed us in the back” and accused the leader of one America’s most important allies of playing a “sophomoric political stunt for domestic consumption”.

In an extraordinary interview with CNN’s State of the Union on Sunday, Larry Kudlow, who was present for negotiations at the G7 (https://www.theguardian.com/world/g7) summit in Quebec over the weekend, said Trudeau had instigated “a betrayal” and was “essentially double-crossing President Trump”.

Trudeau used a media conference on Saturday to reject a US demand for a sunset clause in the North American trade agreement, Nafta, that Trump has at different times pressed to abolish or renegotiate.

The prime minister also said Canada would “move forward with retaliatory measures” in response to the Trump administration’s move to impose tariffs (https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/31/trump-administration-will-put-steel-and-aluminum-tariffs-on-canada-mexico-and-the-eu.html) on aluminium and steel imports from the European Union, Mexico and Canada.

The move enraged Trump, who branded his Canadian counterpart “dishonest and weak”

in a furious tweet (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1005586152076689408), announcing the US would pull out of an agreed communique.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/jun/10/justin-trudeau-donald-trump-tariffs-g7-north-korea-summit

Trash fucked with a Quebecois and his country, descendents from cheese-eating surrender monkeys, and got fucked back hard.

When will Trash says he eats his garbage cheeseburger with Freedom Fries? :lol

Kudlow! , aka Kuddles! :lol, just another of The Best People, another elitist wealthy swampy made-for-TeeVee financial Jew
:lol

Reck
06-10-2018, 02:17 PM
hater (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=7609) my nigga. Another thread backfiring on you.

hater
06-10-2018, 03:32 PM
:lol trumps just obliterated Trudeau and ignored May :lol

Then he left warly to meet Kim Kong :lol bqd ass

Pavlov
06-10-2018, 03:33 PM
:lol trumps just obliterated Trudeau and ignored May :lol

Then he left warly to meet Kim Kong :lol bqd assBut what about all the Yemenis you say he's murdering, hater?

Is that also :lol bqd ass?

Winehole23
06-10-2018, 08:30 PM
The US has an $8.4 billion dollar trade surplus with Canada, our second biggest trading partner.

This graph below represents the recent trend of US dairy exports to Canada:

1005636900558983168

boutons_deux
06-10-2018, 08:45 PM
Trash LIED about trade with USA's partners?

DMX7
06-10-2018, 08:51 PM
:lol trumps just obliterated Trudeau and ignored May :lol

Then he left warly to meet Kim Kong :lol bqd ass

Brah, I would love for Trump to get new trade deals done but he's looking unhinged, isolated and impotent right now... We're not making any progress....

boutons_deux
06-10-2018, 08:52 PM
Why American Businesses Should Be 'Terrified' After President Trump's Comments on Trade

“We as a nation lost $817 billion dollars on trade. That’s ridiculous and it’s unacceptable.”

That premise underpinned President Donald Trump’s bellicose statements on trade at the G7 leadership summit in Quebec, which climaxed with the stunning threat that the U.S. could “stop trading” (http://fortune.com/2018/06/09/donald-trump-threatens-stop-trade/) with some countries.

The threat could seem justified if it were true that the U.S. were actually “losing” such a huge amount on trade. But it’s a flawed and even deceptive claim on multiple levels, most trade experts agree. And the speech as a whole, with its further heightening of Trump’s protectionist ethos, has set off an instant wave of anxiety among economists.

The amount of money Trump is saying the U.S. “lost” is the trade deficit (http://fortune.com/2018/03/07/biggest-us-trade-partners/) :lol –

the amount by which the goods and services Americans bought internationally exceeds the amount they sold to other countries.

But the number he’s citing is itself is fundamentally inaccurate.

Trump has previously

cited an $800 billion trade deficit more than 50 times

, according to the New York Times (https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/06/us/politics/07dc-tradefacts.html).

But whether $800 billion or $817 billion,

Trump’s number only includes trade in goods, excluding services.

That distortion seems to represent

a belief within the administration that manufacturing and farming are inherently better economic activities than providing services.

This ethos would seem to align with the concerns of Trump’s domestic political base.
But it doesn’t match the reality of

America’s position as a global leader in high-value services including finance, engineering, education, and telecommunications.

In fact, the U.S. has a global surplus in service exports – Americans sell more to other countries than they buy from them.

Once they’re added back to the tally, the overall U.S. trade deficit drops to $566 billion – 30% lower than Trump’s number.

In some specific countries, such as Canada (http://fortune.com/2018/03/15/trump-trudeau-trade-deficit/), Trump can only claim there’s a bilateral trade deficit at all because

his numbers exclude services. In reality, the U.S. has a trade surplus with Canada.
That sort of distortion matters because

Trump has shown he’s willing to act on it, including with recent tariffs

on Canadian goods that only make even nominal sense through the lens of his misleading metrics.

Though Canada has so far imposed retaliatory tariffs only on American goods, restrictions (https://www.cato.org/research/services-trade-non-tariff-barriers) on the trade in services could have serious negative impacts in the U.S.

Global demand for American services has been growing fast (https://www.export.gov/article?id=Service-Exports-with-High-Growth-Potential), and

a lot of it is filled by smaller businesses that would be hurt by foreign restrictions.

http://fortune.com/2018/06/09/donald-trump-trade-deficit-terrified-g7-speech/

Winehole23
06-10-2018, 09:07 PM
Average tariff rates charged by G-7 nations:

USA: 1.6%
EU: 1.6%
UK: 1.6%
Italy: 1.6%
Germany: 1.6%
France: 1.6%
Japan: 1.4%
Canada: 0.8%

source: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/TM.TAX.MRCH.WM.AR.ZS?end=2016******=2016&view=bar

Winehole23
06-10-2018, 09:35 PM
Canada had a plan to invade the US as late as 1921:



https://www.macleans.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/MAC50_SCHWARTZ_WAR_POST03.jpg (https://www.macleans.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/MAC50_SCHWARTZ_WAR_POST03.jpg)
In April 1921, Lt.-Col. James “Buster” Sutherland Brown, Canada’s director of military operations and intelligence, drafted the Canadian plan to invade the United States, known as Defence Scheme No. 1. While Brown is often described as a loose cannon, he was actually following orders from the chief of the general staff, who was concerned about an American invasion. After the First World War, America began to supplant Britain as the pre-eminent global power (Britain owed America $22 billion after the war) and so the concern that Canada might once again become a battleground for conflict between the two more powerful countries made some sense...




Brown’s plan to conquer America called for a lot more fatalities than just one. He intended to divide the Canadian army into five flying columns, each of which would capture key American cities, destroy crucial infrastructure, then run away as soon as a large American force counterattacked. The hope was that by destroying bridges and ripping up train tracks while retreating, the United States would be delayed enough that Britain and the rest of the empire could come and finish the job. Brown’s plan got mixed reviews among Canadian military leadership (his successor hated it so much he ordered all copies burned) but it nonetheless remains the last public Canadian plan to invade the United States.
One fun fact: notice that point 5 in the above map reads, “Maritime army reclaims Maine.” The word “reclaims” is appropriate because during the War of 1812 Canada conquered Maine, and used the taxes it collected to found Dalhousie University.https://www.macleans.ca/culture/books/how-canada-planned-to-invade-the-u-s-and-vice-versa/

Winehole23
06-10-2018, 09:37 PM
the US spent $57 million dollars by 1935 on its own plan to take Canada; Charles Lindburgh suggested the use of chemical weapons.



https://www.macleans.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/MAC50_SCHWARTZ_WAR_POST02.jpg (https://www.macleans.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/MAC50_SCHWARTZ_WAR_POST02.jpg)
War Plan Red by Kevin Lippert. (Princeton Architectural Press)



By May 1930, when the Americans came up with their scheme to invade Canada, called War Plan Red, senior American officials were seriously considering the possibility of a war with Britain. The Americans shared the same concern the Canadian drafters of Defence Scheme No. 1 had back in 1921: namely that growing economic competition between the United States and Britain could boil over into a military conflict with Canada as the battleground.

In February 1935 the United States spent $57 million to update their plan to invade Canada. They built three military airfields disguised as civilian airports near the border and staged the largest war game in U.S. history up to then, with 36,500 soldiers drilling, marching, and dreaming of maple syrup. War Plan Red was remarkably similar to Canada’s Defence Scheme No. 1. Troops from Detroit would seize Toronto while Albany and Vermont troops would march on Quebec City and Montreal.

The plan relied on ships out of Boston blockading Halifax and stopping British troops from reinforcing the Canadians. According to the plan, the British would be able to muster 2.5 million soldiers from across the empire so stopping them from landing in Halifax was critical. America’s plan had a darker side too. Famous aviator and suspected Nazi sympathizer Charles Lindbergh flew reconnaissance missions over Canadian airspace and recommended that chemical weapons be used.

Winehole23
06-10-2018, 11:05 PM
btw, where did all the inbound planes on 9/11/01 go?

#neverforget

Spurtacular
06-10-2018, 11:09 PM
btw, where did all the inbound planes on 9/11/01 go?

#neverforget

Splain.

Spurtacular
06-10-2018, 11:10 PM
Average tariff rates charged by G-7 nations:

USA: 1.6%
EU: 1.6%
UK: 1.6%
Italy: 1.6%
Germany: 1.6%
France: 1.6%
Japan: 1.4%
Canada: 0.8%

source: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/TM.TAX.MRCH.WM.AR.ZS?end=2016******=2016&view=bar

And yet the media and the chumpettes are crying. :lol

Spurtacular
06-10-2018, 11:11 PM
the US spent $57 million dollars by 1935 on its own plan to take Canada; Charles Lindburgh suggested the use of chemical weapons.

Not our well-intentioned military!?!?!?!?

Winehole23
06-10-2018, 11:36 PM
Splain.hundreds of flights diverted to Canada, thousands of people taken care of until they could come back.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Yellow_Ribbon

Winehole23
06-10-2018, 11:36 PM
And yet the media and the chumpettes are crying. :lolso is emo Trump

Winehole23
06-10-2018, 11:38 PM
we have a trade surplus with our second biggest trading partner, emo Trump says they're ripping us off. :cry

Winehole23
06-10-2018, 11:38 PM
Not our well-intentioned military!?!?!?!?relax, it was just a contingency

Spurtacular
06-10-2018, 11:58 PM
so is emo Trump

Trump has said he wants to make the playing field fair or in our favor. If you call that crying, then okay bruh.

Winehole23
06-11-2018, 12:13 AM
the idea that Canada is ripping us off is absurd

Winehole23
06-11-2018, 12:15 AM
Trump has said he wants to make the playing field fair or in our favor.how will he do that?

Winehole23
06-11-2018, 12:57 AM
trade war with Canada, Mexico and the EU -- our biggest allies

upfront concessions to China -- our biggest competitor --supposedly in order to elevate North Korea and DJT to world-historical prominence via one-to-one talks.

Pavlov
06-11-2018, 01:04 AM
He sure catapulted Kim to world prominence.

Winehole23
06-11-2018, 01:42 AM
TRUMP WANTS WORLD PEACE

boutons_deux
06-11-2018, 08:22 AM
Trump accuses Canadian leader of being ‘dishonest’ and ‘weak’

The White House tripled down on the Trudeau attack when it sent two top aides onto the Sunday morning talk shows.

One of them said that the bizarre aftermath of the G-7 economic summit (https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/trump-floats-end-to-all-tariffs-threatens-major-penalties-for-countries-that-dont-agree/2018/06/09/a06350be-6bf1-11e8-bea7-c8eb28bc52b1_story.html?utm_term=.2c4f6aa355b5) was a political calculation, meant to show muscularity in advance of the Singapore summit.

“POTUS is not gonna let a Canadian prime minister push him around,” MACHO MAN! :lol

Trump’s chief economic adviser, Larry Kudlow, said on CNN’s “State of the Union.”

“He is not going to permit any show of weakness on the trip to negotiate with North Korea.”

“So this was about North Korea?” CNN host Jake Tapper asked.

“Of course it was, in large part,” Kudlow said. “Kim must not see American weakness.”


Peter Navarro, Trump’s top trade adviser, denounced Trudeau with language rarely used even against America’s adversaries.

“There’s a special place in hell for any foreign leader

that engages in bad-faith diplomacy with President Donald J. Trump and

then tries to stab him in the back on the way out the door,” Navarro said in an interview on “Fox News Sunday.”

“And that’s what bad-faith Justin Trudeau did with that stunt press conference.”


(https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-attacks-canada-to-show-north-korea-hes-strong-aide-says/2018/06/10/afc16c0c-6cba-11e8-bd50-b80389a4e569_story.html?utm_term=.07b2327bc893)The re is no obvious precedent for such a coordinated and acerbic series of attacks by White House advisers on a stalwart U.S. ally.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-attacks-canada-to-show-north-korea-hes-strong-aide-says/2018/06/10/afc16c0c-6cba-11e8-bd50-b80389a4e569_story.html?utm_term=.07b2327bc893 (https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-attacks-canada-to-show-north-korea-hes-strong-aide-says/2018/06/10/afc16c0c-6cba-11e8-bd50-b80389a4e569_story.html?utm_term=.07b2327bc893)

So we got Kuddles saying Trash and America must make a show Macho Man to fat, little Kim, whose tiny, poverty stricken shit hole of a country has nothing going for it except nukes.

So Trash goes crawling to Kim, elevates Kim to international celebrity, to get Kim to destroy his Macho Man nukes. Kim and NK are NOTHING with those nukes.

Trash and his mafiya, as we have seen over and over, are FUCKING STUPID, DICKLESS ASSHOLES

hater
06-11-2018, 11:18 AM
Canadian Bacon is a great movie tbqh

I believe they also portray an american prsident with many similarities to Trump :lol

Winehole23
06-12-2018, 01:30 AM
Canadian Bacon is a great movie tbqhI need to see that, you're the second person to suggest it.

ducks
06-12-2018, 01:35 AM
Canada leader liberal democract
Ofcouse he is weak and dishonest

Winehole23
06-12-2018, 01:38 AM
SLIPPERY EYEBROW! VERY BAD!