DOJ OIG report to find Comey deviated from FBI procedure, no political bias

[djohn2oo8]

1007267819120201733

Devastating for TSA and Chris. No jail for Comey :tu

[djohn2oo8]

1007268885408538624
:lmao TSA
:lmao Nothingburger

[LkrFan]

This afternoon will be interesting. Check out what Seth's tweet string is putting out:

1007261007553720323

FBI helped David Dennison steal the WH? SMDH

[djohn2oo8]

This afternoon will be interesting. Check out what Seth's tweet string is putting out:

1007261007553720323

FBI helped David Dennison steal the WH? SMDH

:lol no. That is not what happened. Jason chaffetz leaking classified information happened. Comey had no choice.

[djohn2oo8]

1007270053371416577 TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA

[djohn2oo8]

1007270924612038657
:lol

[boutons_deux]

I clearly remember that "it was said" in 2016 that Comey went public with the non-indictment of Hillary in June 16 because he knew the NY FBI office HATED Hillary and was going to get her, so Comey had to pre-empt them by breaking FBI protocol ( as in "if no indictment then no FBI comment ) and going on national TV to trash Hillary

Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson (https://twitter.com/SethAbramson) 25m25 minutes ago (https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/1007264238421856256) More

5/ Media is ignoring the most important type of evidence an IG report can reveal: intentional misconduct.

We know rogue FBI agents in the NYC field office illegally leaked to help Donald Trump win, but the media won't cover it.

If Horowitz ignores it, his report is without value.

[djohn2oo8]

TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA

[djohn2oo8]

I clearly remember that "it was said" in 2016 that Comey went public with the non-indictment of Hillary in June 16 because he knew the NY FBI office HATED Hillary and was going to get her, so Comey had to pre-empt them by breaking FBI protocol and going on national TV to Trash Hillary

Seth Abramson‏Verified account @SethAbramson (https://twitter.com/SethAbramson) 25m25 minutes ago (https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/1007264238421856256)More

5/ Media is ignoring the most important type of evidence an IG report can reveal: intentional misconduct.

We know rogue FBI agents in the NYC field office illegally leaked to help Donald Trump win, but the media won't cover it.

If Horowitz ignores it, his report is without value.







Yes. Also remember this tweet from Chaffetz first. That was supposed to be classified.
792047597040971776

[djohn2oo8]

BTW. Giuliani was involved with that NY field office.

[boutons_deux]

BTW. Giuliani was involved with that NY field office.

yep, transvestite Julie Annie had/has all kinds of contacts with FBI and even hinted, a few days before, at Comey's national trashing of Hillary.

[djohn2oo8]

Damn. TSA in hiding

[Pavlov]

He's hiding in the Q thread and turning on Rosenstein just like I said he would be told to do.

He's so predictable it's barely entertaining anymore.

[djohn2oo8]

He's hiding in the Q thread and turning on Rosenstein just like I said he would be told to do.

He's so predictable it's barely entertaining anymore.

:lol

[TSA]

1007267819120201733

Devastating for TSA and Chris. No jail for Comey :tuHow soon you forget that this was simply the first phase of the report being released. There is much more to come, including the investigation by the OIG into FISA abuse.

http://allnewspipeline.com/images/DOJOIGREVIEWJan17.jpg

You are blowing your wad early djohn. I thought you would have learned after you laughed at McCabe's "lack of candor" only to see a criminal referral recommended by the OIG days later.

[Pavlov]

TSA kicks the can down the road again.

[djohn2oo8]

TSA kicks the can down the road again.

:lmao

[TSA]

TSA kicks the can down the road again.

You think this is the final report from the OIG?

[Pavlov]

You think this is the final report from the OIG?

No. You kicked the can down the road again because this report isn't what you wanted it to be -- just like I told you.

What charges are you hoping for from the next report?

[TSA]

Here is how today will go. The MSM will try and downplay the OIG's initial report. A few days will go by and the 500 page report will be reviewed line by line and the MSM will be forced to report on how damning it is.

[TSA]

No. You kicked the can down the road again because this report isn't what you wanted it to be -- just like I told you.

What charges are you hoping for from the next report?

I haven't even read the report, and neither have you. What the fuck are you talking about? :lol

[djohn2oo8]

No political bias. Lordy!

[Pavlov]

I haven't even read the report, and neither have you. What the fuck are you talking about? :lol
I asked what you are hoping for.

[Pavlov]

Here is how today will go. The MSM will try and downplay the OIG's initial report. A few days will go by and the 500 page report will be reviewed line by line and the MSM will be forced to report on how damning it is.How damning is it, TSA?

What is damning in it?

[TSA]

I asked what you are hoping for.

I'm hoping anyone who broke the law faces the appropriate punishment. Now explain to me how you know a report you haven't read is not what I wanted it to be.

[Pavlov]

I'm hoping anyone who broke the law faces the appropriate punishment. Now explain to me how you know a report you haven't read is not what I wanted it to be.Because you went all in on Q and kicked the can down the road.

What laws are you saying were broken?

[TSA]

Because you went all in on Q and kicked the can down the road.

What laws are you saying we're broken?

I haven't read the report.

[djohn2oo8]

I haven't read the report.

So how can you say it will be damning? :rollin

djohn laugh and laugh

[TSA]

How damning is it, TSA?

What is damning in it?

1007292132497948673

1007292141360558081

1007292144581795870

1007292146758684672

1007292156699185154

[monosylab1k]

I haven't read the report.

:lmao

[djohn2oo8]

1007274931640467458
:lmao

[TSA]

So how can you say it will be damning? :rollin

djohn laugh and laugh

Would a text message from the FBI's chief counterintelligence officer saying he will stop Trump from becoming President damning?

[Pavlov]

1007292132497948673

1007292141360558081

1007292144581795870

1007292146758684672

1007292156699185154Wait, now you know what's in the report?

You're flailing, dude.

[djohn2oo8]

Would a text message from the FBI's chief counterintelligence officer saying he will stop Trump from becoming President damning?

There is a problem with your theory. The FBI didn't announce Trump was under investigation until after he was already in office.

:lmao TSA

[TSA]

Wait, now you know what's in the report?

You're flailing, dude.

Was that damning or not damning?

[TSA]

1007274931640467458
:lmao


Jun 13 2018 23:50:25
Q !CbboFOtcZs
1739449
POTUS in possession of (and reviewing):
1. Original IG unredacted report
2. Modified IG unredacted report [RR version]
3. Modified IG redacted report [RR version]
4. IG summary notes re: obstruction(s) to obtain select info (classified)
[#3 released tomorrow]
[SEC: FBI/DOJ handling of HRC email investigation]
[[RR]]
Who has the sole ability to DECLAS it all?
Did you witness the stage being set today?
Nunes/Grassley/Freedom C. push for docs.
[[RR]] central figure within docs (personally involved).
KNOWN CONFLICT.
Immediate impeachment / resignation / termination / recusal IF EVER BROUGHT TO LIGHT.
Be loud.
Be heard.
Fight for TRUTH.
Q

[Pavlov]

Would a text message from the FBI's chief counterintelligence officer saying he will stop Trump from becoming President damning?Depends on if he suspected Russia's influence on the election at that time.

Did he suspect Russia's influence at that time, TSA?

[Pavlov]

Jun 13 2018 23:50:25
Q !CbboFOtcZs
1739449
POTUS in possession of (and reviewing):
1. Original IG unredacted report
2. Modified IG unredacted report [RR version]
3. Modified IG redacted report [RR version]
4. IG summary notes re: obstruction(s) to obtain select info (classified)
[#3 released tomorrow]
[SEC: FBI/DOJ handling of HRC email investigation]
[[RR]]
Who has the sole ability to DECLAS it all?
Did you witness the stage being set today?
Nunes/Grassley/Freedom C. push for docs.
[[RR]] central figure within docs (personally involved).
KNOWN CONFLICT.
Immediate impeachment / resignation / termination / recusal IF EVER BROUGHT TO LIGHT.
Be loud.
Be heard.
Fight for TRUTH.
Q

So you're all in on Q now, TSA?

Yes or no.

[Spurminator]

Mr. Pizzagate urges a cautious approach to speculation.

[Pavlov]

Mr. Pizzagate urges a cautious approach to speculation.BUT HE WAS CHILLING WITH THE SECRET SERVICE OUTSIDE AF1

[djohn2oo8]

BUT HE WAS CHILLING WITH THE SECRET SERVICE OUTSIDE AF1

:lol

[djohn2oo8]

https://i.redd.it/a7210fe028d01.jpg

[djohn2oo8]

1007306838046593024
DOES NOT CHALLENGE decision not to prosecute Clinton. :lmao :lmao :lmao TSA

[Pavlov]

1007306838046593024
DOES NOT CHALLENGE decision not to prosecute Clinton. :lmao :lmao :lmao TSA
YOU JUST WAIT UNTIL THE NEXT REPORT. ALSO FIRE THE JEW.

[Chucho]

Yeah...all the nothing that everyone knew was going to come from this came from this.

Time to roll out all the nothingness that will come from the Mueller investigation so we can try and cope and facilitate these next two years and move on from this chapter in stupid American history.

[TSA]

Yeah...all the nothing that everyone knew was going to come from this came from this.

Time to roll out all the nothingness that will come from the Mueller investigation so we can try and cope and facilitate these next two years and move on from this chapter in stupid American history.

The report hasn’t even been released yet :lol

[TSA]

1007308398151467010

[djohn2oo8]

1007308398151467010

1007316403668553728
TSA DOWN! TSA DOWN!

[djohn2oo8]

1007316403668553728
TSA DOWN! TSA DOWN!

:lmao TSA

https://thumbs.gfycat.com/WavyFemaleAmericancicada-size_restricted.gif

[Chucho]

1007308398151467010


That's not changing the nothingness that is coming from this. You went "all-in" on a Hail Mary and it was batted down and will be batted down once it's "officially" released. Either way, it was/is a futile, ineffective and generally useless production.

[Pavlov]

1007316403668553728
DAMNING!

[djohn2oo8]

DAMNING!

:rollin TSA

[pgardn]

Yeah...all the nothing that everyone knew was going to come from this came from this.

Time to roll out all the nothingness that will come from the Mueller investigation so we can try and cope and facilitate these next two years and move on from this chapter in stupid American history.


Russians and US citizens have, and will continue to be snagged for interfering in our elections.

This is far from nothing.
Keep this going as long as possible as well as shoring up our entire process. You will have Boots on your back every time an R wins an election. You want people still thinking Trump is an illegitimate winner then you go right ahead and hope it ends. We KNOW the Russians played our elections. That’s enough.

Cant see how people brush this idly aside.

[LkrFan]

1007306838046593024
DOES NOT CHALLENGE decision not to prosecute Clinton. :lmao :lmao :lmao TSA

:lol

[Chucho]

Russians and US citizens have, and will continue to be snagged for interfering in our elections.

This is far from nothing.
Keep this going as long as possible as well as shoring up our entire process. You will have Boots on your back every time an R wins an election. You want people still thinking Trump is an illegitimate winner then you go right ahead and hope it ends. We KNOW the Russians played our elections. That’s enough.

Cant see how people brush this idly aside.


We don't know how much they played in it. Until we get beyond some circumstantial evidence and some friggin ineffectual, and completely laughable, "indictments" that will never be answered from some Russian troll farmers, I don't invest too much stock into it. If it was as massive as predicted with someone as stupid as Trump and the political neophytes he surrounded himself with, there'd be more to it. There's more evidence of DNC collusion than Russian collusion.

I brush it by as much as Lefties brushed Hillary's incredibly shady past and issues (email servers and smashed cell phones) and the Bernie collusion by. I brush it off as easily as PizzaGate, Obama's birth certificate and so on. Not enough smoke for me to worry about the "fire".

[Splits]

Absolutely unreal! :lmao

[TSA]

That's not changing the nothingness that is coming from this. You went "all-in" on a Hail Mary and it was batted down and will be batted down once it's "officially" released. Either way, it was/is a futile, ineffective and generally useless production.

:lol batted down

You don’t understand how these reports work. There will not be criminal recommendations made in the report. Those come separately. Splits learned that one the hard way. Give it a few days after the report is actually released and reviewed and then you can say I was batted down.

[TSA]

Absolutely unreal! :lmao

:lmao the timing

:lmao you didn’t learn from the last time

[djohn2oo8]

:lol batted down

You don’t understand how these reports work. There will not be criminal recommendations made in the report. Those come separately. Splits learned that one the hard way. Give it a few days after the report is actually released and reviewed and then you can say I was batted down.

Texts no relevance to Russia probe! Lordy!

[Pavlov]

:lol batted down

You don’t understand how these reports work. There will not be criminal recommendations made in the report. Those come separately. Splits learned that one the hard way. Give it a few days after the report is actually released and reviewed and then you can say I was batted down.What criminal recommendations are you hoping for?

[TSA]

Texts no relevance to Russia probe! Lordy!

That explains why the FBI hid them from Congress :lol

[Splits]

OIG reports continue to deliver delicious nothingburgers. But wait, WAIT until the next one! :lmao

[TSA]

What criminal recommendations are you hoping for?
Already answered you just didn’t like it.

[pgardn]

We don't know how much they played in it. Until we get beyond some circumstantial evidence and some friggin ineffectual, and completely laughable, "indictments" that will never be answered from some Russian troll farmers, I don't invest too much stock into it. If it was as massive as predicted with someone as stupid as Trump and the political neophytes he surrounded himself with, there'd be more to it. There's more evidence of DNC collusion than Russian collusion.

I brush it by as much as Lefties brushed Hillary's incredibly shady past and issues (email servers and smashed cell phones) and the Bernie collusion by. I brush it off as easily as PizzaGate, Obama's birth certificate and so on. Not enough smoke for me to worry about the "fire".

Its not about Trump and collusion imo.

Its about punishing people who interefered. Those Troll farmers get money and guidance. We have already hit some of the guys in Putin’s top group of buddies. This needs to continue as well as a comprehensive look into all States keeping a secure system in place. This was played through numerous angles besides trolls. We have learned some but we need to keep scratching.

Rs like you make the mistake of thinking this is all about bringing down Trump because of Boots and Djohnlike attitudes. It’s not. I don’t believe Trump colluded but I firmly believe a good look is absolutely necessary. Once elections in a country are questioned, democracy gets in trouble. Trump still looking for 3 million illegal votes... I guess you want Mueller on this...

For gods sake Trump knows we got played by Russia, he’s just worried about family and friends.

[Splits]

:lmao the timing

:lmao you didn’t learn from the last time

lol "learn"

I learned it was a nothingburger when it was released and a nothingburger today

[TSA]

OIG reports continue to deliver delicious nothingburgers. But wait, WAIT until the next one! :lmao

You, nor any reporter, has even read the first one. :lol

You going to disappear again like the last time McCabe got a criminal referral?

[Winehole23]

Russians and US citizens have, and will continue to be snagged for interfering in our elections.which US citizens have been snagged for election interference?

honest question, not sure who you're talking about.

[TSA]

lol "learn"

I learned it was a nothingburger when it was released and a nothingburger today

Link to the report since it’s been released. K thx.

[Chucho]

Its not about Trump and collusion imo.

Its about punishing people who interefered. Those Troll farmers get money and guidance. We have already hit some of the guys in Putin’s top group of buddies. This needs to continue as well as a comprehensive look into all States keeping a secure system in place. This was played through numerous angles besides trolls. We have learned some but we need to keep scratching.

Rs like you make the mistake of thinking this is all about bringing down Trump because of Boots and Djohnlike attitudes. It’s not. I don’t believe Trump colluded but I firmly believe a good look is absolutely necessary. Once elections in a country are questioned, democracy gets in trouble. Trump still looking for 3 million illegal votes... I guess you want Mueller on this...

For gods sake Trump knows we got played by Russia, he’s just worried about family and friends.


Great post! +3

[djohn2oo8]

That explains why the FBI hid them from Congress :lol

DOJ concluded this son. You lose. Again. Your boy Horwitz.

[djohn2oo8]

which US citizens have been snagged for election interference?

honest question, not sure who you're talking about.

Its in Mueller 13 indictments of the Russians. He indicted an american too.

[pgardn]

which US citizens have been snagged for election interference?

honest question, not sure who you're talking about.

Good question. None. But lying about even talking to Russians. We may never know the extent since some of them have pleaded out. As far as innocent intereference, apparently a number of Trump campaign organizers.

[pgardn]

Its in Mueller 13 indictments of the Russians. He indicted an american too.

What was the American indicted for, I can’t recall exactly?

[Winehole23]

Its in Mueller 13 indictments of the Russians. He indicted an american too.Who?

[djohn2oo8]

1007322502513811456
:lmao Rudy

[djohn2oo8]

1007327031300907009

[Pavlov]

Already answered you just didn’t like it.Actually, you didn't answer it at all.

I asked you what criminal recommendations you are hoping for. Reading the entire OIG report -- which you will not do -- is not needed to hope for any criminal recommendations.

You have made claim after claim about this OIG report without reading it and continue to do so today -- but you clam up when merely asked what you hope about it.

What criminal recommendations are you hoping for?

[Spurminator]

It was an unprofessional text but not surprising nor evidence of tampering/malpractice.

It's telling that this is all TSA can cling to.

[Winehole23]

the new tack seems to be that everything damning can already be found in the OIG report -- but that nobody is willing to pay attention to it.

QAnon's tip about POTUS comparing different versions is similar.

DJT supporters going lit crit, always an entertaining gambit.

[hitmanyr2k]

1007327031300907009

Wasn't Strzok also the guy that helped Comey draft the letter to re-open the Clinton investigation right before the election? Not sure how that was supposed to help Clinton beat Trump :lol

[TSA]

1007327031300907009

In assessing the decision to prioritize the Russia investigation over following up on the Midyear-related investigative lead discovered on the Weiner laptop, we were particularly concerned about text messages sent by Strzok and Page that potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions they made were impacted by bias or improper considerations.
Most of the text messages raising such questions pertained to the Russia investigation, and the implication in some of these text messages, particularly Strzok’s August 8 text message (“we’ll stop” candidate Trump from being elected), was that Strzok might be willing to take official action to impact a presidential candidate’s electoral prospects. Under these circumstances, we did not have confidence that Strzok’s decision to prioritize the Russia investigation over following up on the Midyear-related investigative lead discovered on the Weiner laptop was free from bias.

https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download

[djohn2oo8]

1007325127837650946

[Winehole23]

TSA on cue

[Pavlov]

the new tack seems to be that everything damning can already be found in the OIG report -- but that nobody is willing to pay attention to it.

QAnon's tip about POTUS comparing different versions is similar.

DJT supporters going lit crit, always an entertaining gambit.ALL THE GOOD STUFF HAD BEEN REDACTED BY THE JOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

[TSA]

TSA on cue

on cue reading the actual report :bobo

[Spurminator]

In assessing the decision to prioritize the Russia investigation over following up on the Midyear-related investigative lead discovered on the Weiner laptop, we were particularly concerned about text messages sent by Strzok and Page that potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions they made were impacted by bias or improper considerations.

Most of the text messages raising such questions pertained to the Russia investigation, and the implication in some of these text messages, particularly Strzok’s August 8 text message (“we’ll stop” candidate Trump from being elected), was that Strzok might be willing to take official action to impact a presidential candidate’s electoral prospects. Under these circumstances, we did not have confidence that Strzok’s decision to prioritize the Russia investigation over following up on the Midyear-related investigative lead discovered on the Weiner laptop was free from bias.

https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download

You've pushed your chips in on a 10 / 5 non-suited.

[djohn2oo8]

1007333118817308672

[Spurminator]

There were clearly tensions and disagreements in a number of important areas between Midyear agents and prosecutors. However, we did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected the specific investigative decisions we reviewed in Chapter Five, or that the justifications offered for these decisions were pretextual.

Nonetheless, these messages cast a cloud over the FBI’s handling of the Midyear investigation and the investigation’s credibility. But our review did not find evidence to connect the political views expressed in these messages to the specific investigative decisions that we reviewed; rather, consistent with the analytic approach described above, we found that these specific decisions were the result of discretionary judgments made during the course of an investigation by the Midyear agents and prosecutors and that these judgment calls were not unreasonable.

So ultimately, Strzokgate boils down to bad optics.

This can't be what 4chan sleuths were hoping for.

[TSA]

You've pushed your chips in on a 10 / 5 non-suited.

I’m only on Page 12...flop hasn’t even been dealt.


“We were deeply troubled by text messages exchanged between Strzok and Page that potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions were impacted by bias or improper considerations. Most of the text messages raising such questions pertained to the Russia investigation, which was not a part of this review. Nonetheless, when one senior FBI official, Strzok, who was helping to lead the Russia investigation at the time, conveys in a text message to another senior FBI official, Page, “No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it” in response to her question “[Trump’s] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!”, it is not only indicative of a biased state of mind but, even more seriously, implies a willingness to take official action to impact the presidential candidate’s electoral prospects. This is antithetical to the core values of the FBI and the Department of Justice.“

https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download

[djohn2oo8]

I’m only on Page 12...flop hasn’t even been dealt.


“We were deeply troubled by text messages exchanged between Strzok and Page that potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions were impacted by bias or improper considerations. Most of the text messages raising such questions pertained to the Russia investigation, which was not a part of this review. Nonetheless, when one senior FBI official, Strzok, who was helping to lead the Russia investigation at the time, conveys in a text message to another senior FBI official, Page, “No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it” in response to her question “[Trump’s] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!”, it is not only indicative of a biased state of mind but, even more seriously, implies a willingness to take official action to impact the presidential candidate’s electoral prospects. This is antithetical to the core values of the FBI and the Department of Justice.“

https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download

1007334597242179586

[Spurminator]

Our report makes nine recommendations to the Department and the FBI to assist them in addressing the issues that we identified in this review:

• We recommend that the Department and the FBI consider developing guidance that identifies the risks associated with and alternatives to permitting a witness to attend a voluntary interview of another witness (including in the witness’s capacity as counsel).

• We recommend that the Department consider making explicit that, except in situations where the law requires or permits disclosure, an investigating agency cannot publicly announce its recommended charging decision prior to consulting with the Attorney General, Deputy Attorney General, U.S. Attorney, or his or her designee, and cannot proceed without the approval of one of these officials.

• We recommend that the Department and the FBI consider adopting a policy addressing the appropriateness of Department employees discussing the conduct of uncharged individuals in public statements.

• We recommend that the Department consider providing guidance to agents and prosecutors concerning the taking of overt investigative steps, indictments, public announcements, or other actions that could impact an election.

• We recommend that the Office of the Deputy Attorney General take steps to improve the retention and monitoring of text messages Department-wide.

• We recommend that the FBI add a warning banner to all of the FBI’s mobile phones and devices in order to further notify users that they have no reasonable expectation of privacy.

• We recommend that the FBI consider (a) assessing whether it has provided adequate training to employees about the proper use of text messages and instant messages, including any related discovery obligations, and (b)providing additional guidance about the allowable uses of FBI devices for any nongovernmental purpose, including guidance about the use of FBI devices for political conversations.

• We recommend that the FBI consider whether(a) it is appropriately educating employees about both its media contact policy and the Department’s ethics rules pertaining to the acceptance of gifts, and (b) its disciplinary provisions and penalties are sufficient to deter such improper conduct.

• We recommend that Department ethics officials include the review of campaign donations for possible conflict issues when Department employees or their spouses run for public office.

[djohn2oo8]

1007328693621084161

[Spurminator]

I’m only on Page 12...flop hasn’t even been dealt.

“We were deeply troubled by text messages exchanged between Strzok and Page that potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions were impacted by bias or improper considerations. Most of the text messages raising such questions pertained to the Russia investigation, which was not a part of this review. Nonetheless, when one senior FBI official, Strzok, who was helping to lead the Russia investigation at the time, conveys in a text message to another senior FBI official, Page, “No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it” in response to her question “[Trump’s] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!”, it is not only indicative of a biased state of mind but, even more seriously, implies a willingness to take official action to impact the presidential candidate’s electoral prospects. This is antithetical to the core values of the FBI and the Department of Justice.“

https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download

The flop has been dealt, you just haven't read the cards. Even the part you posted is still only about optics. That's the report in a nutshell.

[Pavlov]

https://i.imgur.com/TEV1ZXT.jpg

[Chucho]

LOL. Nothing Burger with no meat whatsoever.

[Reck]

Another massive dud and another epic failed prediction by TSA

:lol McCabe is fucked
:lol Comey is fucked
:lol Hillary is fucked
:lol Strok and Paige are fucked

:lmao None of them are even facing charges let alone going to jail for it. And what's worst of all is that this makes Hillary look like the victim.

[djohn2oo8]

Another massive dud and another epic failed prediction by TSA

:lol McCabe is fucked
:lol Comey is fucked
:lol Hillary is fucked
:lol Strok and Paige are fucked

:lmao None of them are even facing charges let alone going to jail for it. And what's worst of all is that this makes Hillary look like the victim.

:lmao He is still reading

[djohn2oo8]

1007337341189582848

[TSA]

:lmao He is still reading

Of course I’m reading it. You continue to rely on a pair of Kyles to read it for you.

[Reck]

Of course I’m reading it. You continue to rely on a pair of Kyles to read it for you.

Let me condense it for you: No one gets charged.

At least you can add this to the list of failures you got going.

[TSA]

Let me condense it for you: No one gets charged.


I’m going to give you a chance to redeem your confirmed welsher status.

ELE bet

Someone gets charged.

We got a deal?

[Reck]

I’m going to give you a chance to redeem your confirmed welsher status.

ELE bet

Someone gets charged.

We got a deal?

Another bet? Dont you have a new schtick yet?

Or do you like getting owned constantly? :lol Like an addict looking for his next fix.

[Pavlov]

I’m going to give you a chance to redeem your confirmed welsher status.

ELE bet

Someone gets charged.

We got a deal?From today's report?

Who?

[TSA]

Another bet? Dont you have a new schtick yet?

Or do you like getting owned constantly? :lol Like an addict looking for his next fix.

I want to see you if you’ll welsh twice. Do you accept the bet yes or no?

[TSA]

From today's report?

Who?

Why do you care you won’t do an ELE bet with me.

[Pavlov]

Why do you care you won’t do an ELE bet with me.This is only about muh bets for you.

Not like, the United States or anything.

You don't give a shit about that.

OK.

[Blake]

:cry Why do you care you won’t do an ELE bet with me:cry.

[Reck]

I want to see you if you’ll welsh twice. Do you accept the bet yes or no?

Nah, you just have a desease called degeneracy and constantly need your fix to get you right for the day.

Consider reading the whole report and ponder if you want to actually make a bet that, base on this report, anyone from Comey to Paige and her boyfriend are going to be charge with a crime.


Why do you care you won’t do an ELE bet with me.

Do you see?

You need to get some help, if not for yourself, for the sake of your family, imo.

[TSA]

This is only about muh bets for you.

Not like, the United States or anything.

You don't give a shit about that.

OK.

And what the fuck is this about for you? Is your 24/7 shit posting making our country a better place? :rollin

[TSA]

Nah, you just have a desease called degeneracy and constantly need your fix to get you right for the day.

Consider reading the whole report and ponder if you want to actually make a bet that, base on this report, anyone from Comey to Paige and her boyfriend are going to be charge with a crime.


Do you accept the bet yes or no?

[Reck]

Do you accept the bet yes or no?

Define the bet.

Who's the person or persons you think are getting charged from this IG report today?

[Pavlov]

And what the fuck is this about for you? Is your 24/7 shit posting making our country a better place? :rollinIt's a political discussion board. I like to discuss politics on the political discussion board.

If you only want to talk about muh bets, just say so.

Do you only want to talk about muh bets?

Yes or no.

[TSA]

Define the bet.

Who's the person or persons you think are getting charged from this IG report today?

Terms are simple. You said no one is getting charged, I get the field.

[koriwhat]

OMG

[TSA]

It's a political discussion board. I like to discuss politics on the political discussion board.

If you only want to talk about muh bets, just say so.

Do you only want to talk about muh bets?

Yes or no.

:lol thinking your tired schtick is political discussion

[spurraider21]

:lmao is this where we were supposed to hear about muh exoneration letter?

and muh tarmac meeting

[Pavlov]

:lol thinking your tired schtick is political discussionI asked you whom you thought would be charged from today's report.

It's relevant to both the investigation and muh bet.

Why don't you just say the person(s) you think will be charged from today's report?

[Pavlov]

:lmao is this where we were supposed to hear about muh exoneration letter?

and muh tarmac meetingFELONY UNLAWFUL EXONERATION

[Spurminator]

Felony Bad Optics

[TSA]

:lmao is this where we were supposed to hear about muh exoneration letter?

and muh tarmac meeting

500+ page exoneration letter for Trump firing Comey

[Spurminator]

997164344499671040

Have you gotten to this part of the report yet, TSA?

[TSA]

Have you gotten to this part of the report yet, TSA?

Was McCabe’s criminal referral in Horowitz initial report yes or no?

[Pavlov]

Have you gotten to this part of the report yet, TSA?I'm going to guess it's not who TSA was hoping to be indicted.

But technically it would win muh bet that no one actually took -- which is all that matters.

[Reck]

Terms are simple. You said no one is getting charged, I get the field.

I said no one gets charged based on the IG report released today which you have said would end in Comey and company being charged and swiftly sent to prison.

Your words.


There's nothing to give up on, Clinton/DNC/FBI/DOJ are all fucked. It's amusing watching the left claim victory after a 4 page memo was released while forgetting that the OIG investigation has been going on for over a year and Horowitz has been working directly with Grassley and Nunes. Where do you think the source documents Nunes used came from? Where did the Strzok/Page texts come from? Who recovered the Strzok/Page texts the FBI said were missing?


The OIG investigation will build upon this and reveal far more damaging information.


Could be an ongoing criminal investigation tied to the IG report.



McCabe and his lawyer have been able to review the first phase of the OIG report for a couple of weeks now. They aren’t asking for immunity as a courtesy they’re asking for immunity because they’ve read what Horowitz has and McCabe’s fucked.

:lmao Riding his life on this report just to have it blow up in his face.

:lmao McCabe is fucked. :lmao

[koriwhat]

I said no one gets charged based on the IG report released to day which you have said would end in Comey and company being charged and swiftly sent to prison.

Your words.

:lmao Riding his life on this report just to have it blow up in his face.

:lmao McCabe is fucked. :lmao

trump aside... why do yall dick ride these losers who sought nothing more than to destroy our country by any means possible? why? why are you rooting for the evil that has held us back as a nation for so long to be slapped on the wrist? what's your motivation for supporting these sick and twisted individuals who had a nefarious agenda from the get go and decades past?

some of yall are just losers who support other losers i suppose.

[Winehole23]

who are you talking about, koriwhat?

what is the evil that has held us back as a nation?

what nefarious agenda?

[TSA]

Jun 13 2018 23:50:25
Q !CbboFOtcZs
1739449
POTUS in possession of (and reviewing):
1. Original IG unredacted report
2. Modified IG unredacted report [RR version]
3. Modified IG redacted report [RR version]
4. IG summary notes re: obstruction(s) to obtain select info (classified)
[#3 released tomorrow]
[SEC: FBI/DOJ handling of HRC email investigation]
[[RR]]
Who has the sole ability to DECLAS it all?
Did you witness the stage being set today?
Nunes/Grassley/Freedom C. push for docs.
[[RR]] central figure within docs (personally involved).
KNOWN CONFLICT.
Immediate impeachment / resignation / termination / recusal IF EVER BROUGHT TO LIGHT.
Be loud.
Be heard.
Fight for TRUTH.
Q

1003949263481696256

He knows. He’s known the whole time.

[Pavlov]

1003949263481696256

He knows. He’s known the whole time.You are aware Trump can declassify anything he wants, aren't you?

So you're all in on Q now?

Yes or no.

[Spurminator]

Was McCabe’s criminal referral in Horowitz initial report yes or no?

The report submitted in April? Sure. The tweet you posted was May 17. Was this retroactive BREAKING news?


Any updates on this? So weird to see BREAKING NEWS like that just kind of die...


you have the patience of a millenial

Retroactive patience?

Disingenuous as always. Just admit you got caught posting bullshit again. You're either stupid enough to believe the bullshit or you're shameful enough to peddle it. Either way, you're pathetic.

[spurraider21]

but guys the NEXT one is gonna be huge!!!


1. Oh, man. If I’m looking at things right, this OIG report is going to stun the nation. This is going to be MASSIVE.

2. POTUS may already have this report, given his tweets over the last 24 hours. Trump certainly knows about it. Even he seems shocked.

3. Forget Watergate. Forget any scandal you have ever heard about, researched or read about in your lifetimes. The scale of what is going to emerge in the next days and weeks will be unlike anything you have ever considered possible.

8. Targets : Comey, Lynch, Bill Clinton, McCabe, Strzok. Anyone involved in the fraudulent clearance of Hillary Clinton by James Comey on that fateful day in July, as well as the farcical shut down/cover up of the Human Abedin email trove (November) is about to be nailed.

9. Those not exposed have either flipped on a plea deal, or WILL be exposed. All of them.

Speculating - but I now suspect Strzok & perhaps Lisa Page flipped and were ‘recruited’ by Mueller into his SC, in order to tell the OIG everything they knew.

10. Next - 'Allegations that the FBI Deputy Director should have been recused from participating in certain investigative matters;’

Targets - Andrew McCabe & Comey.

11. This will expose McCabe’s links to the Clintons, especially his accepting some $700,000 as a bribe from the Clintons to cover up the investigations into her classified material. As well as any other shonky conduct he has been up to over the years.

on that note...


16. Note that this is about to drop just after gen (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=14810)Flynn quietly departs the scene. Thomas Wictor’s important analysis has revealed Flynn’s masterful role in identifying these individuals.
:lmao "quietly departs"
:lmao thomas wictor's important analysis
:lmao WORLD WAR I FLAMETHROWER EXPERT


27. The final sentence of the OIG statement is often overlooked, but VERY important.

'Finally, if circumstances warrant, the OIG will consider including other issues that may arise during the course of the review.'

28. This essentially authorizes the OIG & DOJ to investigate anything they want arising from the above, which is pretty much everything the Clintons & perhaps even Obama himself, have been up to.

:lol there goes your argument that mueller has overstepped his authority. thanks for the admission :lol



Peter Strzok---Lead Clinton email investigation. Interviewed Clinton, Mills, Abedin. Changed Comey's gross negligence to extremely careless. Lead Trump/Russia investigation. FBI handler of Christopher Steele. Removed from Mueller's team.

:lol no decisions were result of political bias


The best part of all these texts coming out is that it is the fault of the Democrats for calling on the OIG to investigate how Clinton's email investigation was handled.

:lol no decisions were result of political bias


Note the 1st issue Horowitz was tasked with investigating: that's Comey's decision not to press charges against Hillary Clinton & her aides *despite* the obvious fact the law was broken numerous times relating to classified information.

We now know, thanks to the IG & his special agents investigation into this, that Peter Strzok & others in the FBI *knew* Hillary & her aides, Cheryl Mills & Huma Abedin, repeatedly lied in their interviews about Hillary's illegal email server.

Clinton/Mills/Abedin insisted to the FBI agents that they never intentionally sent class. info over nonsecure lines.

Mills & Abedin compounded their lies by claiming they didn't even KNOW about this private server of Hillary's until after she left the St. Dept.

Strzok & others in the FBI at that time had emails in their possession that demonstrated Hillary/Mills/Abedin were sending emails to each other DISCUSSING the private server.

These emails were written, of course, while Hillary was still the Secretary of State.

So Strzok & other agents in the FBI were very well aware they were being lied to extensively during these interviews.

And they made a deliberate decision to let them skate.

So 1 of the VERY FIRST THINGS Horowitz established in his investigation was that proper procedures were NOT followed in this investigation of the email server.

Agents let powerful Democrats boldly lie to them and get away with it.

But, in the course of investigating why FBI agents including Strzok let Hillary & her aides boldly lie to them & then walk away without any charges, IG Horowitz uncovered SOMETHING ELSE.

Not only were FBI agents - who are supposed to be strictly politically neutral at their jobs - giving Democratic politicians & their staff preferential treatment, Horowitz discovers these same FBI agents & others at the DOJ are engaging in blatant political fixing.

:lmao


Sometime this month, after the initial Inspector General Michael Horowitz release, House Judiciary Chair Bob Goodlatte and Senate Judiciary Chair Chuck Grassley will likely call for a Special Counsel to investigate the upper-level management of the FBI and DOJ.

We should support that approach. The SC can quickly put a Grand Jury together and start presenting the IG investigative evidence, as well as enforceable subpoenas for witnesses.

There’s a lot of different down-stream legal issues:

The unlawful exoneration of Hillary Clinton by political operatives in the DOJ/FBI.
The unlawful destruction of evidence; and the manipulation of investigative protocols to gain a specific and pre-planned political outcome. (Peter Strzok, Andrew McCabe)
:lol grocer conspiracies


“Judicial Watch today released Justice Department records showing that FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe did not recuse himself from the investigation into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s unsecure, non-government email server until Tuesday, November 1, 2016, one week prior to the presidential election. The Clinton email probe was codenamed “Midyear Exam.”

“While working as Assistant Director in Charge of the Washington Field Office, McCabe controlled resources supporting the investigation into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s email scandal.”

https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-new-documents-show-fbi-deputy-director-mccabe-not-recuse-clinton-email-scandal-investigation-week-presidential-election/


OMG Strzok drafted a letter about reopening the Clinton investigation why was he still booted from Mueller’s team he obviously did nothing wrong.

The attempts by the MSM to stop the bleeding are pointless. Nothing will stop the OIG report from coming out.

:lol who would waste time stopping a nothingburger?


958871389951418368

Lays it out in the thread
:lmao the next one tho... gonna be huge

[Reck]

You are aware Trump can declassify anything he wants, aren't you?

So you're all in on Q now?

Yes or no.

TSA is all in on the Trump cult now. :lmao retard cant even defend his own posts he made weeks ago.

[Pavlov]

Pretty funny that a couple hours after BIGBOOMBOMBOIGOMGREPORT drops both kori and TSA have reverted to their respective conspiracy mantras.

[Spurminator]

1003949263481696256

He knows. He’s known the whole time.

He's probably known that the report was going to be a nothingburger and he knows his lackeys like you had their hopes up for a different result.

Look at you. Posting Trump tweets as evidence of reality. You should be embarrassed.

[TSA]

The report submitted in April? Sure. The tweet you posted was May 17. Was this retroactive BREAKING news?





Retroactive patience?

Disingenuous as always. Just admit you got caught posting bullshit again. You're either stupid enough to believe the bullshit or you're shameful enough to peddle it. Either way, you're pathetic.

:lol thinking this is anywhere close to over

1007327035277168641

[Pavlov]

:lol thinking this is anywhere close to over

1007327035277168641What are you saying is going to happen, TSA?

[TSA]

Huber

[Spurminator]

:lol thinking this is anywhere close to over

1007327035277168641

I have no doubt it's not over for you, because you didn't get what you wanted. Now you're posting statements from Jeff Sessions and Donald Trump because you're desperate to avoid disappointment. Next you'll be giving us James Woods and Chuck Woolery takes like Chris.

But noted that you avoided further discussion of the Sperry tweet that fooled you good.

[spurraider21]

Huber
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRDX3umHIZD5J26oeV7RRd6Gtu3fJsUR jHVhnp-pTkkOjcZWhZr-Q

[Spurminator]

but guys the NEXT one is gonna be huge!!!



on that note...


:lmao "quietly departs"
:lmao thomas wictor's important analysis
:lmao WORLD WAR I FLAMETHROWER EXPERT



:lol there goes your argument that mueller has overstepped his authority. thanks for the admission :lol




:lol no decisions were result of political bias



:lol no decisions were result of political bias



:lmao


:lol grocer conspiracies





:lol who would waste time stopping a nothingburger?


:lmao the next one tho... gonna be huge

I expect this absolute dismantling to be completely ignored.

https://i.imgur.com/wayArEt.gif

[Pavlov]

Huber


https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRDX3umHIZD5J26oeV7RRd6Gtu3fJsUR jHVhnp-pTkkOjcZWhZr-Q
:rollin

[TSA]

I have no doubt it's not over for you, because you didn't get what you wanted. Now you're posting statements from Jeff Sessions and Donald Trump because you're desperate to avoid disappointment. Next you'll be giving us James Woods and Chuck Woolery takes like Chris.

But noted that you avoided further discussion of the Sperry tweet that fooled you good.

I responded directly to the Sperry tweet. A criminal recommendation would not be in the initial Horowitz report released today, just like the criminal recommendation for McCabe was not included in that initial report.

Like I said earlier, wait a few days. We haven’t even heard anything from Huber.

[Pavlov]

I expect this absolute dismantling to be completely ignored.

https://i.imgur.com/wayArEt.gif21 keeps dem receipts.

Like the ones Underwood has now.

[Pavlov]

I responded directly to the Sperry tweet. A criminal recommendation would not be in the initial Horowitz report released today, just like the criminal recommendation for McCabe was not included in that initial report.

Like I said earlier, wait a few days. We haven’t even heard anything from Huber.Great, who do you think will be charged due to today's report and for what?

[Spurminator]

I responded directly to the Sperry tweet. A criminal recommendation would not be in the initial Horowitz report released today, just like the criminal recommendation for McCabe was not included in that initial report.

Like I said earlier, wait a few days. We haven’t even heard anything from Huber.

Sperry_: BREAKING: IG Horowitz has found "reasonable grounds" for believing there has been a violation of federal criminal law.

Where does the report say this? What actions detailed in the report, even in your opinion, qualify as criminal violations?

[pgardn]

who are you talking about, koriwhat?

what is the evil that has held us back as a nation?

what nefarious agenda?


Msnbc
Michael Brown
Traayvon Martin

[Reck]

Great, who do you think will be charged due to today's report and for what?

Cant come up with a name and it's his bet.

[TSA]

Cant come up with a name and it's his bet.

I don’t need a name. You said no one I took everyone else.

[pgardn]

Incoming from Trumpworld:

FBI and DOJ can’t be trusted.
Stop Mueller investigation.
Take a completely different investigation and bind them.

ETA, tonight.

[ducks]

Mueller should be tried for treason

[Spurminator]

TSA cares more about bets than his integrity.

[Pavlov]

I don’t need a name. You said no one I took everyone else.I didn't ask about muh bet.

I asked what you think.

[spurraider21]

I expect this absolute dismantling to be completely ignored.
sigh

[TSA]

I didn't ask about muh bet.

I asked what you think.

You didn’t ask about my bet yet you keep quoting my discussion about my bet. Shoo.

[TSA]

sigh

Your post was admirable and pathetic at the same time. :bobo

[Pavlov]

You didn’t ask about my bet yet you keep quoting my discussion about my bet. Shoo.:lol this is not muh bet thread.

I know you're completely shook and embarrassed today, but that doesn't mean you can't discuss the IG report in the IG report thread.

[Pavlov]

Your post was admirable and pathetic at the same time. :boboYou got destroyed tbh.

Now you're trying to shoo away people who embarrassed you.

lol

[Reck]

I don’t need a name. You said no one I took everyone else.

You mean you broadened the scope to cover your ass when and if someone gets charged that had nothing to do with the IG report. Doesn't work that way.

BTW, Christopher Wray with the icing on the cake regarding the IG report and no one being charged with a crime pertaining with it's finding.

You lost twice today.

[spurraider21]

TSA is always in awe of my ability to use the search function

[Pavlov]

TSA is always in awe of my ability to use the search functionAUTIST

[pgardn]

TSA cares more about deals than his integrity.

So TSA is a Trump man to the bone.

[Spurminator]

TSA is always in awe of my ability to use the search function

He's making fun of you for spending so much time pulling up claims he's made about an issue he spends roughly ten hours a day reading about on conspiracy forums.

[spurraider21]

Your post was admirable and pathetic at the same time. :bobo
great. so do you admit that the IG report on the handling of the clinton investigation did not go the way you thought it would? exoneration letter, biased decisions, et al?

and before you say it, yes, i know there are more IG reports... most notably on the FISA process. but i'm askin specifically about this one.

[ducks]

How 7 words in the 500-page IG report give Donald Trump all the 'deep state' ammo he wanted
https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/14/politics/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-text-message-ig-report/index.html

[spurraider21]

How 7 words in the 500-page IG report give Donald Trump all the 'deep state' ammo he wanted
https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/14/politics/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-text-message-ig-report/index.html
cnn fake news

[TSA]

You mean you broadened the scope to cover your ass when and if someone gets charged that had nothing to do with the IG report. Doesn't work that way.

BTW, Christopher Wray with the icing on the cake regarding the IG report and no one being charged with a crime pertaining with it's finding.

You lost twice today.

You said no one would be charged, you set the terms.

BTW, Christopher Wray doesn’t charge people.

[Pavlov]

great. so do you admit that the IG report on the handling of the clinton investigation did not go the way you thought it would? exoneration letter, biased decisions, et al?

and before you say it, yes, i know there are more IG reports... most notably on the FISA process. but i'm askin specifically about this one.
https://s22.postimg.cc/7busbliu9/kick.gif

[TSA]

great. so do you admit that the IG report on the handling of the clinton investigation did not go the way you thought it would? exoneration letter, biased decisions, et al?

and before you say it, yes, i know there are more IG reports... most notably on the FISA process. but i'm askin specifically about this one.


Which way did you think I thought this one would go?

[Pavlov]

You said no one would be charged, you set the terms.

BTW, Christopher Wray doesn’t charge people.Was anyone referred to the DOJ in today's report?

[TSA]

great. so do you admit that the IG report on the handling of the clinton investigation did not go the way you thought it would? exoneration letter, biased decisions, et al?

and before you say it, yes, i know there are more IG reports... most notably on the FISA process. but i'm askin specifically about this one.

I’ll ask you the same question I asked Sperm, does the IG make criminal referrals in the initial report?

[spurraider21]

Which way did you think I thought this one would go?
that didn't answer my question.

Dodge #1

do you admit that the IG report on the handling of the clinton investigation did not go the way you thought it would? exoneration letter, biased decisions, et al?

[Pavlov]

I’ll ask you the same question I asked Sperm, does the IG make criminal referrals in the initial report?Everyone's talking about today's report tbh.

Didn't see much in there but didn't read the whole thing.

[TSA]

Was anyone referred to the DOJ in today's report?

5 FBI employees were referred back to the FBI in today’s report. Just like McCabe was referred back to the FBI in Horowitz initial report.

Was McCabe referred for criminal referral in the initial report?

[spurraider21]

I’ll ask you the same question I asked Sperm, does the IG make criminal referrals in the initial report?
they didn't in the mccabe case. they haven't so far in the clinton matter. i don't know if that means they would never include the referrals in their initial reports.

but you didn't answer my question

Dodge #2

do you admit that the IG report on the handling of the clinton investigation did not go the way you thought it would? exoneration letter, biased decisions, et al?

[Pavlov]

....and TSA indicates things didn't go his way by bogging everyone down in semantics and sour graping today's report.

More muh bets incoming.

[TSA]

that didn't answer my question.

Dodge #1

do you admit that the IG report on the handling of the clinton investigation did not go the way you thought it would? exoneration letter, biased decisions, et al?

It was a damning report. It’s too early for me to answer your question. I’ll wait for any referrals made by Horowitz to Huber before being able to answer your question. I know Strzok was referred to Huber by Horowitz, just not sure yet for what.

[Chris]

1007368935338053632

[Pavlov]

5 FBI employees were referred back to the FBI in today’s report. Just like McCabe was referred back to the FBI in Horowitz initial report.No, today's referrals are not "just like" McCabe's at all.

It's not what you wanted. It's OK to admit that.

[Pavlov]

It was a damning report. It’s too early for me to answer your question. I’ll wait for any referrals made by Horowitz to Huber before being able to answer your question. I know Strzok was referred to Huber by Horowitz, just not sure yet for what.
https://s22.postimg.cc/7busbliu9/kick.gif

[spurraider21]

It was a damning report. It’s too early for me to answer your question. I’ll wait for any referrals made by Horowitz to Huber before being able to answer your question.
did the report itself go how you expected it to go? exoneration letter, changing recklessness to gross negligence, biased decisions, etc


I know Strzok was referred to Huber by Horowitz, just not sure yet for what.
link? please dont be sperry tweet

[Chris]

Inspector General Put Together An Insane FBI Leak Chart Upon Finding Rules ‘Widely Ignored’


http://thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Screen-Shot-2018-06-14-at-4.13.44-PM-998x636.png




The Department of Justice inspector general report released today includes two elaborate charts mapping the volume of communications identified between FBI employees and members of the media in April, May, and October 2016.

“We have profound concerns about the volume and extent of unauthorized media contacts by FBI personnel that we have uncovered during our review,” the report states.

Here’s “Attachment H” in the IG report.


http://thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Screen-Shot-2018-06-14-at-4.19.46-PM.png


Here’s “Attachment G” in the IG report.


http://thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Screen-Shot-2018-06-14-at-4.13.44-PM.png


The issue of FBI employees improperly disclosing non-public information, a.k.a. leaking tips to reporters, “raised considerable concerns,” according to investigators. They discovered a number of social interactions with reporters deemed inconsistent with FBI policy and department ethics rules.

“FBI employees received tickets to sporting events from journalists, went on golfing outings with media representatives, were treated to drinks and meals after work by reporters, and were the guests of journalists at nonpublic social events,” the report states.

Despite being able to track the number of times agents communicated with reporters, the IG cites two reasons for being unable to identify individual leakers.

First, we frequently find that the universe of Department and FBI employees who had access to sensitive information that has been leaked is substantial, often involving dozens, and in some instances, more than 100 people. We recognize that this is a challenging issue, because keeping information too closely held can harm an investigation and the supervision of it. Nevertheless, we think the Department and the FBI need to consider whether there is a better way to appropriately control the dissemination of sensitive information.

Then there’s this:

Second, although FBI policy strictly limits the employees who are authorized to speak to the media, we found that this policy appeared to be widely ignored during the period we reviewed. We identified numerous FBI employees, at all levels of the organization and with no official reason to be in contact with the media, who were nevertheless in frequent contact with reporters. The large number of FBI employees who were in contact with journalists during this time period impacted our ability to identify the sources of leaks.

The IG’s stated takeaway from the discovered leaks is a needed change in the FBI’s apparent cultural attitude. They recommended that the FBI “evaluate whether (a) it is sufficiently educating its employees about both its media contact policy and the Department’s ethics rules, and (b) its disciplinary penalties are sufficient to deter such improper conduct.”

http://thefederalist.com/2018/06/14/inspector-general-put-together-insane-fbi-leak-chart-upon-finding-rules-widely-ignored/

[Chucho]

^^^ Boiled down, "They broke some house rules" which equates to NOTHINGBURGER. NOTHING, absolutely NOTHING happened to anyone of any sort of relevance nor will anything happen to anyone of relevance on either side of the fence.

[Chris]

1007345955232940032

[TSA]

did the report itself go how you expected it to go? exoneration letter, changing recklessness to gross negligence, biased decisions, etcYes.



link? please dont be sperry tweetpage 427 footnote 217
https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download

[TSA]

No, today's referrals are not "just like" McCabe's at all.

It's not what you wanted. It's OK to admit that.

What did I want? Be specific.

[Pavlov]

Yes.:rollin

[Pavlov]

What did I want? Be specific.According to the actual report released today, you wanted:

1) a nothingburger

2) everyone to laugh at you

3) to say you really want things in the next report but not to actually say what they are

You got it.

[TSA]

According to the actual report released today, you wanted:

1) a nothingburger

2) everyone to laugh at you

3) to say you really want things in the next report but not to actually say what they are

You got it.


Did you actually think Horowitz would make criminal referrals in this initial release yes or no?

[Chucho]

According to the actual report released today, you wanted:

1) a nothingburger

2) everyone to laugh at you

3) to say you really want things in the next report but not to actually say what they are

You got it.

http://img.viralnova.com/000/457/413/desktop-1458576181.png

[Trill Clinton]

1007376361101582336

[Pavlov]

Did you actually think Horowitz would make criminal referrals in this initial release yes or no?I thought the IG report wouldn't be what you wanted it to be and not much would result from it just like Fast and Furious.

I said this several times.

I didn't change what I said.

I didn't hide what I said.

I didn't deny what I said.

If you didn't want something big out of this report, you wouldn't have made such a big deal of it.

But you did.

You don't want to own it but you do.

[Reck]

You said no one would be charged, you set the terms.

BTW, Christopher Wray doesn’t charge people.

I get today's event shook you to your core but keep up, please. I never said people "would get charged."

I said no one got charged over this report. Not even a referral. :lol

You posted:

Of course I’m reading it. You continue to rely on a pair of Kyles to read it for you.

I replied to said post:

Let me condense it for you: No one gets charged.

At least you can add this to the list of failures you got going.

[TSA]

I thought the IG report wouldn't be what you wanted it to be and not much would result from it just like Fast and Furious.

I said this several times.

I didn't change what I said.

I didn't hide what I said.

If you didn't want something big out of this report, you wouldn't have made such a big deal of it.

But you did.

You don't want to own it but you do.

I didn’t ask you about any of that and you just dodged a simple yes or no question. Try again.

Did you actually think Horowitz would make criminal referrals in this initial release yes or no?

[TSA]

I get today's event shook you to your core but keep up, please. I never said people "would get charged."

I said no one got charged over this report. Not even a referral. :lol

You posted:


I replied to said post:

You make no sense.

[Reck]

You make no sense.

I made no sense by pointing out that today's nothingburger resulted in no one getting charged with a crime? :lol

[Pavlov]

I didn’t ask you about any of that and you just dodged a simple yes or no question. Try again. Sorry, you have several questions pending. You can't demand answers at all.

I thought charges were possible for McCabe before any report was made, but kind of improbable that DOJ would actually choose to bring them. Prosecution would be problematic.

[spurraider21]

Yes.
what did the IG report say about the exoneration letter, changing recklesness to gross negligence to gross negligence?


page 427 footnote 217
https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download
does Huber work for Southern District of New York or Eastern District of Virginia?

and what conduct of Strzok was criminally referred to Huber according to your theory?

[TSA]

Sorry, you have several questions pending. You can't demand answers at all.

I thought charges were possible for McCabe before any report was made, but kind of improbable that DOJ would actually choose to bring them. Prosecution would be problematic.This is your white flag. You’ve answered plenty of my questions today and then when you get one you don’t like you try and pull this card like a little bitch :lol Try again.

I didn’t ask you about McCabe I asked you about today’s report.

Did you actually think Horowitz would make criminal referrals in this initial release yes or no?

[Pavlov]

This is your white flag. You’ve answered plenty of my questions today You haven't.


I didn’t ask you about McCabe I asked you about today’s report.

Did you actually think Horowitz would make criminal referrals in this initial release yes or no?I didn't think he would be making any at all, so no.

What criminal referrals are you saying he will make against whom, TSA?

Been asking you that for hours and you've been waving your white flag the entire time.

[TSA]

No, today's referrals are not "just like" McCabe's at all.

It's not what you wanted. It's OK to admit that.

Red3LBQc73k

Christopher Wray disagrees. Referred to the OPR, just like McCabe.

9:40

[TSA]

You haven't.

I didn't think he would be making any at all, so no.after he made a criminal referral from a spin-off of the initial investigation you don’t think he’d recommend another? lol


What criminal referrals are you saying he will make against whom, TSA?

Been asking you that for hours and you've been waving your white flag the entire time.

I don’t know what they’ll be or who they’ll be for I just think in a few days they’ll be made.

[Pavlov]

Red3LBQc73k

Christopher Wray disagrees. Referred to the OPR, just like McCabe.

9:40All my reading says that McCabe was referred to the USAO-DC for determination of criminal charges.

I guess you've already made that leap.

[TSA]

what did the IG report say about the exoneration letter, changing recklesness to gross negligence to gross negligence?


does Huber work for Southern District of New York or Eastern District of Virginia?

and what conduct of Strzok was criminally referred to Huber according to your theory?

I’m still doing a lot of reading will have to back to you on your first question.

No Huber doesn’t work at either but he was working with Horowitz so I can safely assume he was notified.

I just said Strzok was referred and said I’d wait to see what it was for. Footnote isn’t specific.

[Pavlov]

after he made a criminal referral from a spin-off of the initial investigation you don’t think he’d recommend another? lolSince it's a nothingburger, nope.


I don’t know what they’ll be or who they’ll be for I just think in a few days they’ll be made.So you think someone will be charged with something someday and that's muh bet certain but my saying I doubt anyone else will be charged is somehow pure insanity.

[Pavlov]

I’m still doing a lot of reading will have to back to you on your first question.

No Huber doesn’t work at either but he was working with Horowitz so I can safely assume he was notified.

I just said Strzok was referred and said I’d wait to see what it was for. Footnote isn’t specific.FELONY MEAN TEXTS

[Chris]

Huber waiting in the batter's box. Can't wait for the rest of the reports.

[Pavlov]

Huber waiting in the batter's box. Can't wait for the rest of the reports.
https://s22.postimg.cc/7busbliu9/kick.gif

[Chris]

1007390466378207232

[Chris]

You want predictions?

Criminal prosecution for Comey and McCabe at least.

[djohn2oo8]

lol. TSA spent weeks hyping this up

[spurraider21]

I know Strzok was referred to Huber by Horowitz, just not sure yet for what.


I’m still doing a lot of reading will have to back to you on your first question.

No Huber doesn’t work at either but he was working with Horowitz so I can safely assume he was notified.
movedgoalpost.gif

so you knew strzok was referred to huber because the report had a footnote that said NY and VA offices were notified.

and nowhere does it say he was referred for any charges. just says they were notified of his actions.

[Chris]

1007398958426140675
1007400039436648453
1007402621261541378
1007404340712263686
1007405264247681030

[ducks]

The head of the FBI said on Thursday the agency accepted a watchdog's findings on its conduct during the investigation into former presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's emails and said employees would be held accountable for any misconduct.

[djohn2oo8]

Somebody get TSA some onions for that nothingburger so he can cry more.

[Pavlov]

https://s22.postimg.cc/7busbliu9/kick.gif

[spurraider21]

watching all the damage control is priceless

[TSA]

watching all the damage control is priceless

The only ones doing damage control are the ones running around claiming nothingburger. Have you read more than the summary?

[spurraider21]

The only ones doing damage control are the ones running around claiming nothingburger. Have you read more than the summary?
yes. have you take a closer look at footnote 217?

its clear that there were inappropriate actions taken by employees. the key takeaway is that they didnt find that the investigation was inappropriately handled by those employees... outside of Comey who should not have held his July presser without letting DOJ higher-ups know about it

will some employees face reprimand? yeah probably. but this didnt reveal some grand conspiracy to protect clinton... improper exoneration letter, improperly changing recklesness to negligence, investigation to matter, etc.

[TSA]

1007268885408538624
:lmao TSA
:lmao Nothingburger



1007390905593094144

1007390907480489985

[djohn2oo8]

:lmao amazing damage control

[Chris]

*nervous laughter emoticon

[djohn2oo8]

*nervous laughter emoticon

:lol laughing at you and TSA.

[Chris]

1. New texts between FBI lovers Strzok and Page were 'disappointing' and cast a shadow over the integrity of the entire Clinton email probe.


2. Three additional, unnamed FBI employees -- including one lawyer who later worked on the Mueller probe -- are under scrutiny for anti-Trump bias.


3. Investigators didn't give a good reason for not pursuing laptops and cellphones belonging to Clinton's senior aides.


4. Despite Clinton connections, former Assistant Attorney General Peter Kadzik and former Deputy Director Andrew McCabe didn't fully recuse themselves .


5. 'Insubordinate' Ex-FBI Director James Comey repeatedly violated policy and inaccurately described the legal situation surrounding Clinton's emails.


6. Former Obama Attorney General Loretta Lynch made errors in judgment during the Clinton probe.


7. FBI agents' actions surrounding the DOJ/FBI interview of Hillary Clinton were 'inappropriate' and created appearance of bias.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/06/14/highlights-from-doj-igs-bombshell-report-on-clinton-email-probe.html

[TSA]

yes. have you take a closer look at footnote 217?

its clear that there were inappropriate actions taken by employees. the key takeaway is that they didnt find that the investigation was inappropriately handled by those employees... outside of Comey who should not have held his July presser without letting DOJ higher-ups know about it

will some employees face reprimand? yeah probably. but this didnt reveal some grand conspiracy to protect clinton... improper exoneration letter, improperly changing recklesness to negligence, investigation to matter, etc.

You’re failing to see the bigger picture.

“not only indicative of a biased state of mind but, even more seriously, implies a willingness to take official action to impact the presidential candidate’s electoral prospects.”

Horowitz is setting the table for Strzok and the Russia investigation report release.

[spurraider21]

You’re failing to see the bigger picture.

“not only indicative of a biased state of mind but, even more seriously, implies a willingness to take official action to impact the presidential candidate’s electoral prospects.”

Horowitz is setting the table for Strzok and the Russia investigation report release.
kickingcan.gif

this report was specific to the clinton matter. not to do with russia investigation and FISA stuff

are you actually claiming this report is everything you wanted with regard to the clinton matter?

[TSA]

kickingcan.gif

this report was specific to the clinton matter. not to do with russia investigation and FISA stuff

are you actually claiming this report is everything you wanted with regard to the clinton matter?

Yes. Comey got his ass dragged through the mud and the obstruction of justice charge against Trump just died.

Do you think Strzok’s actions in this report just disappear and aren’t taken into consideration with him then leading the Russia investigation?

[djohn2oo8]

:lol TSA can't name one thing that went his way today

[spurraider21]

Yes. Comey got his ass dragged through the mud and the obstruction of justice charge against Trump just died.
but what about the stuff about clinton getting special treatment and the exoneration letter and the changing of investigation to matter and recklessness to negligence, etc. you've ducked this several times already


Do you think Strzok’s actions in this report just disappear
nah, i'm sure they'll get some form of punishment tbh.


and aren’t taken into consideration with him then leading the Russia investigation?
you're moving the goalpost from this report on the clinton matter to the eventual report on the russia investigation/fisa stuff

[TSA]

but what about the stuff about clinton getting special treatment and the exoneration letter and the changing of investigation to matter and recklessness to negligence, etc. you've ducked this several times already

what about it? It happened and isn’t up for debate. If you think those were the proper things to do that’s on you.






you're moving the goalpost from this report on the clinton matter to the eventual report on the russia investigation/fisa stuffthey are intimately tied together and involve the same bad actors in the FBI

[Pavlov]

You’re failing to see the bigger picture. OK, what's the big picture?

Who's getting charged with what after all is said and done?

[TSA]

Aug. 8, 2016

Page: “[Trump’s] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!”
Strzok: “No. No he’s not. We’ll stop it.”

Strzok told investigators he didn’t remember the message, but that “he believed that it was intended to reassure Page that Trump would not be elected, not to suggest that he would do something to impact the investigation.” :lol

[djohn2oo8]

OK, what's the big picture?

Who's getting charged with what after all is said and done?

[TSA]

:lol TSA can't name one thing that went his way today

Another day without Trump, Trump Jr, Ivanka, or Kushner in prison is another day closer to you coughing up $2000.

I’ll make you an offer. If you want to pay me $500 today I’ll allow our current bets to be pulled off the table. Do you accept my offer?

[djohn2oo8]

:lol TSA can't name one thing that went his way today

[Pavlov]

Good Lord. More muh bets.

[TSA]

Another day without Trump, Trump Jr, Ivanka, or Kushner in prison is another day closer to you coughing up $2000.

I’ll make you an offer. If you want to pay me $500 today I’ll allow our current bets to be pulled off the table. Do you accept my offer?

[djohn2oo8]

:lol TSA can't name one thing that went his way today

[djohn2oo8]

gotta love how when this thread first got started TSA kept saying "gotta wait and read the actual report" and then proceeded to move the goalposts even wider after he read it.

[TSA]

gotta love how when this thread first got started TSA kept saying "gotta wait and read the actual report" and then proceeded to move the goalposts even wider after he read it.

gotta love your attempts to avoid my question

[TSA]

Jun 13 2018 23:50:25
Q !CbboFOtcZs
1739449
POTUS in possession of (and reviewing):
1. Original IG unredacted report
2. Modified IG unredacted report [RR version]
3. Modified IG redacted report [RR version]
4. IG summary notes re: obstruction(s) to obtain select info (classified)
[#3 released tomorrow]
[SEC: FBI/DOJ handling of HRC email investigation]
[[RR]]
Who has the sole ability to DECLAS it all?
Did you witness the stage being set today?
Nunes/Grassley/Freedom C. push for docs.
[[RR]] central figure within docs (personally involved).
KNOWN CONFLICT.
Immediate impeachment / resignation / termination / recusal IF EVER BROUGHT TO LIGHT.
Be loud.
Be heard.
Fight for TRUTH.
Q

1007415842307371009

1007415843083317248

oops

[Pavlov]

OMG WEIRD FORMATTING

[Chris]

Yup

1007418042119319552

[Chris]

1007417061205831680

[djohn2oo8]

Swing and a miss

[Reck]

Chris, are you ok?

Dude's taking what went on today worse than TSA. Dude's out there claiming sex pedo rings and scandals.

Chris be sprung.

[spurraider21]

what about it? It happened and isn’t up for debate. If you think those were the proper things to do that’s on you.
:lmao is that why OIG was silent?

[djohn2oo8]

Chris, are you ok?

Dude's taking what went on today worse than TSA. Dude's out there claiming sex pedo rings and scandals.

Chris be sprung.

They spent months hyping up a flop.

[TSA]

:lmao is that why OIG was silent?

I assume you’ve read the whole thing?

I haven’t read the entire thing yet. I’m reading about the Weiner laptop right now on Page 329.

“In assessing the decision to prioritize the Russia investigation over following up on the Midyear-related investigative lead discovered on the Weiner laptop, we considered the text messages that Strzok exchanged with Page expressing hostility for then candidate Trump and preference for a Clinton victory. We were particularly concerned about text messages sent by Strzok and Page that potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions they made were impacted by bias or improper considerations. Most of the text messages raising such questions pertained to the Russia investigation, and the implication in some of these text messages, particularly Strzok’s August 8 text message (“we’ll stop” candidate Trump from being elected), was that Strzok might be willing to take official action to impact a presidential candidate’s electoral prospects. Under these circumstances, we did not have confidence that Strzok’s decision to prioritize the Russia investigation over following up on the Midyear-related investigative lead discovered on the Weiner laptop was free from bias.”

[TSA]

They spent months hyping up a flop.

Says the OP of a year+ still running 1,000+ page flop of a Trump/Russia collusion thread :lmao

[djohn2oo8]

Says the OP of a year+ still running 1,000+ page flop of a Trump/Russia collusion thread :lmao

Sorry bud no flop. Niggas indicted directly tied to Russia probe. Sorry Trump didn't get an exoneration letter :rollin

[Chris]

Dude's out there claiming sex pedo rings and scandals.

You must have missed this.


https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dfmpu_IUcAI135T.jpg


Quick do your "lol pizzagate" thingy and log off so you don't have to think about it.