Peter Strzok sends TSA to the tree of Woe

[dabom]

Yeah, instead of lashing out and melting down, it'd be easier to say " I don't understand the concept I copied and pasted onto this forum. Since I'm unsure of myself, I'll add a few more smileys to make myself feel better."

White flag noted, daderp.

Didn't say he did anything. I'm still laughing at you and your interpretation of genocide.
:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao :lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao :lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao

:lmao

[Chucho]

daderp going into meltdown mode because he doesn't understand how genocide works.

[dabom]

Look, you say something then switch it up like a dumb fuck 2 mins later. :lmao :lmao

"Pick a lane" Pavlov (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=7343) :lmao :lmao

[Chucho]

LOL, "genocide".

[dabom]

LOL, "genocide".

No more emojis? :lmao :lmao

[Chucho]

Republicans are genociding the Mexicans and Latinos

:lol:lol:lol:lol:lol:lol:lol:lol:lol:lol:lol:lol:l ol:lol:lol:lol:lol:lol:lol:lol:lol:lol:lol:lol:lol :lol:lol:lol:lol:lol

[dabom]

Look, you say something then switch it up like a dumb fuck 2 mins later. :lmao :lmao

"Pick a lane" Pavlov (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=7343) :lmao :lmao

:lmao

[Chucho]

Republicans are genociding the Mexicans and Latinos

:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao :lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao

[dabom]

I slapped you around already then you slap yourself afterwards. :lmao :lmao

[Chucho]

I'm genociding myself :lmao :lmao
:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao :lmao:lmao

[dabom]

Hey Chris (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=1656) can you check on Chucho (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=20531)?













Thanks in advance. :toast

[Chris]

Hey Chris (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=1656) can you check on Chucho (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=20531)?













Thanks in advance. :toast

lol calling for Pavlov's help

[dabom]

lol calling for Pavlov's help

That's not how it works. :lol

[ElNono]

Says nothing about hate or trying to stop anparticular presidential candidate tbqh

It's political speech... thinking/saying something isn't a crime per se

[Pavlov]

Getting pissy because you posted fake news from Comey’s fluffer :lollol you're pissy because I called you out on your non-existent accusations.

Not even WWI flamethrowers could help you with that one.

[Winehole23]

Does no one wonder why Mueller didn't ask Strzok anything about the texts? If someone who works for you did something stupid like than on company phone, wouldn't you ask? It's a "don't know anything about it, so I can't be questioned about it."honest question, how do you know they didn't discuss it?

what's your source on this?

[dabom]

honest question, how do you know they didn't discuss it?

what's your source on this?

The "Feelings" Party. :lol

[spurraider21]

The #1and #2 have been fired, #2 is charged with a crime. #3 is demoted to HR, reported to FBI OPR, and under investigation. I have confidence the institution is being cleaned and will most definitely survive.


why was the #1 fired

[rmt]

honest question, how do you know they didn't discuss it?

what's your source on this?

Didn't Strok? say in his testimony that Mueller didn't ask him about his texts? Or did Strok? lie about that?

[dabom]

Didn't Strok? say in his testimony that Mueller didn't ask him about his texts? Or did Strok? lie about that?

Can you cite that. Thanks.

[Winehole23]

Didn't Strok? say in his testimony that Mueller didn't ask him about his texts? Or did Strok? lie about that?you tell me, I didn't watch or read his testimony.

are you relying on what somebody else said about Strzok's testimony? if so, who?

[rmt]

https://www.c-span.org/video/?447953-1/fbi-deputy-assistant-director-peter-strzok-testifies-2016-investigations******=0

Matt Gaetz - R-FL from 6:29:00 to 6:34:32

[Winehole23]

bum link

[rmt]

patience - some of us aren't up on this technology

[rmt]

Well, my attempt to clip the section didn't work. You'll just have to scroll to listed time. Maybe someone could please tell me how to clip a part of a video.

[rmt]

https://www.c-span.org/video/?447953-1/fbi-deputy-assistant-director-peter-strzok-testifies-2016-investigations******=0

Well, I'm not wasting any more of my life on this

[Pavlov]

Yeah. Formatting goes wonky, but here's the start page. Easy enough to find the time specified.

https://www.c-span.org/video/?447953-1/fbi-deputy-assistant-director-peter-strzok-testifies-2016-investigations-part-1

[Winehole23]

I don't really get what you're driving at. What's your point here?

[rmt]

I don't really get what you're driving at. What's your point here?

If you were heading an investigation and someone working for you sent those texts, wouldn't you at least ask why he was stupid enough to send such texts on a work phone, what he meant about stopping Trump, what he meant about "insurance plan" and whether that had any effect on the work he had done in the investigations Strzok had already done? I would. Mueller didn't want to know so no one could ask him about the texts.

[Winehole23]

Mueller pulled Strzok off the investigation. Was that inappropriate?

[Pavlov]

If you were heading an investigation and someone working for you sent those texts, wouldn't you at least ask why he was stupid enough to send such texts on a work phone, what he meant about stopping Trump, what he meant about "insurance plan" and whether that had any effect on the work he had done in the investigations Strzok had already done? I would. Mueller didn't want to know so no one could ask him about the texts.No reason for him to ask about any of it. He knew the texts gave the appearance of bias and that's all he needed to act on.

No one -- not one person has given any evidence that Strzok's mean texts affected the investigation in any way. I'm sure they never will. All this is subject to review and the Clinton stuff has already been reviewed.

[TSA]

No reason for him to ask about any of it. He knew the texts gave the appearance of bias and that's all he needed to act on.

No one -- not one person has given any evidence that Strzok's mean texts affected the investigation in any way. I'm sure they never will.

Which investigation are you referring to?

[koriwhat]

Mueller pulled Strzok off the investigation. Was that inappropriate?

totally appropriate but the real question is when did mueller know of strzok's bias? before the hrc investigation or during the special council investigation? all these agents know each other especially the upper echelon of which strzok and mueller belong to. i doubt mueller was blind to the bias of strzok prior to even the hrc investigation.

[Pavlov]

Which investigation are you referring to?Any investigation. You had your chance, TSA. You folded.

I'll ask again: What are you saying Strzok did?

List your accusations.

[Pavlov]

Look TSA, you've been saying for years that there has always been enough evidence in the hands of the authorities to put Hillary in federal prison.

They still have all that evidence.

Trump has been in power for a year and a half.

Why no charges?

[Winehole23]

JAIL HER!

[dabom]

Look TSA, you've been saying for years that there has always been enough evidence in the hands of the authorities to put Hillary in federal prison.

They still have all that evidence.

Trump has been in power for a year and a half.

Why no charges?

They have the Presidency, Congress, The Senate, and the Supreme Court and yet, she shits on all of them. :lmao

[dabom]

If Hillary was guilty of anything like ya say, and she is walking free right now, she has more power than the fucking president. :lmao :wow

[TSA]

Any investigation. You had your chance, TSA. You folded.

I'll ask again: What are you saying Strzok did?

List your accusations.

Peter Strzok was involved in the Clinton investigation and the Russia investigation. Which one are you claiming his bias did not impact?

[dabom]

Peter Strzok was involved in the Clinton investigation and the Russia investigation. Which one are you claiming his bias did not impact?

How did it impact them? Surely you got something. :lmao

[Pavlov]

Peter Strzok was involved in the Clinton investigation and the Russia investigation. Which one are you claiming his bias did not impact?What part of "any investigation" do you not understand?

I'll ask again: What are you saying Strzok did?

List your accusations.

[Pavlov]

JAIL HER!


They have the Presidency, Congress, The Senate, and the Supreme Court and yet, she shits on all of them. :lmao


If Hillary was guilty of anything like ya say, and she is walking free right now, she has more power than the fucking president. :lmao :wow

1017561579192283141

:lol

[spurraider21]

The #1and #2 have been fired, #2 is charged with a crime. #3 is demoted to HR, reported to FBI OPR, and under investigation. I have confidence the institution is being cleaned and will most definitely survive.


why was the #1 fired

[dabom]

He did something wrong. What did he do? I can't say... :lol

[TSA]

What part of "any investigation" do you not understand?

I'll ask again: What are you saying Strzok did?

List your accusations.

Are you claiming his bias did not impact the Russia investigation yes or no?

[dabom]

Are you claiming his bias did not impact the Russia investigation yes or no?

That's your talking point. Not his. :lol

[spurraider21]

Are you claiming his bias did not impact the Russia investigation yes or no?
he said no evidence exists that strzok's texts affected any investigation in any way.

[dabom]

You claimed he did something wrong and now you're asking pavlov to prove otherwise. :lol

Are you a fucking retard? :lmao

[boutons_deux]

Are you claiming his bias did not impact the Russia investigation yes or no?

as he testified in the Repug kangaroo court, he was one of many people, below, equal, and above him in counterintel who were involved in the hunt for the Russians.

but for you Trash fellators, he totally queered, biased, screwed the investigation all by his lonesome self.

[Pavlov]

Are you claiming his bias did not impact the Russia investigation yes or no?Question pending.

I'll ask again: What are you saying Strzok did?

List your accusations.

[TSA]

he said no evidence exists that strzok's texts affected any investigation in any way.

That’s quite the claim if that’s indeed what he is claiming. IG Horowitz could not even say with confidence that Strzok’s bias didn’t bleed into his investigative decisions concerning the opening of the Russia investigation. Horowitz hasn’t even released the findings on that so I’m curious as to how Pavlov came to that conclusion.

[TSA]

Question pending.

I'll ask again: What are you saying Strzok did?

List your accusations.

Helped orchestrate a bogus investigation into the President elect and eventual President.

Are you claiming his bias did not impact the Russia investigation yes or no?

[Pavlov]

That’s quite the claim if that’s indeed what he is claiming. IG Horowitz could not even say with confidence that Strzok’s bias didn’t bleed into his investigative decisions concerning the opening of the Russia investigation. Horowitz hasn’t even released the findings on that so I’m curious as to how Pavlov came to that conclusion.Great, list all your evidence that Strzok’s bias did affect investigations.

I'm waiting.

[djohn2oo8]

That’s quite the claim if that’s indeed what he is claiming. IG Horowitz could not even say with confidence that Strzok’s bias didn’t bleed into his investigative decisions concerning the opening of the Russia investigation. Horowitz hasn’t even released the findings on that so I’m curious as to how Pavlov came to that conclusion.

:lmao "bleed into investigative decisions"

[dabom]

That’s quite the claim if that’s indeed what he is claiming. IG Horowitz could not even say with confidence that Strzok’s bias didn’t bleed into his investigative decisions concerning the opening of the Russia investigation. Horowitz hasn’t even released the findings on that so I’m curious as to how Pavlov came to that conclusion.

You can have an opinion before the conclusion you dumb fuck. :lol

It's like anything else in life, take basketball, we up 40 with 2 mins to go. Yes the game isn't over but everything is pointing in that direction. :lol

You can come to the conclusion that he didn't do anything wrong and there is no evidence of bias in his work, or else it would have come up in the hearing. :lol

[TSA]

as he testified in the Repug kangaroo court, he was one of many people, below, equal, and above him in counterintel who were involved in the hunt for the Russians.

but for you Trash fellators, he totally queered, biased, screwed the investigation all by his lonesome self.

Who was above him in the Russia investigation?

[Pavlov]

Helped orchestrate a bogus investigation into the President elect and eventual President.

Are you claiming his bias did not impact the Russia investigation yes or no?Any investigation.

Any investigation.

Any investigation.

Any investigation.

Any investigation.

Moron.

[TSA]

:lmao "bleed into investigative decisions"

Horowitz words not mine.

[djohn2oo8]

TSA ignoring the search warrants signed by judges and the indictments returned by Grand Juries.

[dabom]

I'm gonna leave the poor fella alone. Clearly he has zero reasoning skills.

[Pavlov]

TSA ignoring the search warrants signed by judges and the indictments returned by Grand Juries.Nope. It wuz all Bleedin' Pete!

[TSA]

Any investigation.

Any investigation.

Any investigation.

Any investigation.

Any investigation.

Moron.

How did you come to that conclusion when the man with all the evidence can’t even come to that conclusion?

[djohn2oo8]

Nope. It wuz all Bleedin' Pete!

Can't forget Carter Page blabbering like a fucking idiot about his connections with the Kremlin.

[dabom]

Manafort still using burner phones. :lol

[rmt]

Look TSA, you've been saying for years that there has always been enough evidence in the hands of the authorities to put Hillary in federal prison.

They still have all that evidence.

Trump has been in power for a year and a half.

Why no charges?

They don't still have that evidence - Hillary deleted 33k of her emails, laptops and cel phones have been smashed, computers have been bleach-bitted.

[Pavlov]

How did you come to that conclusion when the man with all the evidence can’t even come to that conclusion?Because he has to come to the conclusion that his bias did affect these investigations.

That's how these things work, TSA.

You cling to your innuendo as long as humanly possible. I get that. You want to avoid a repeat of your past humiliations as much as possible -- but you have to prove your claims at some point.

You haven't.

[dabom]

They don't still have that evidence - Hillary deleted 33k of her emails, laptops and cel phones have been smashed, computers have been bleach-bitted.

She destroyed evidence and she walking free now. OMG the same talking points that go nowhere. :lol

[TSA]

TSA ignoring the search warrants signed by judges and the indictments returned by Grand Juries.

How many of those indictments have to do with the Trump colluding with Russians theory you’ve pushed for over a year?

[Pavlov]

They don't still have that evidence - Hillary deleted 33k of her emails, laptops and cel phones have been smashed, computers have been bleach-bitted.Read the post more carefully next time.

[djohn2oo8]

How many of those indictments have to do with the Trump colluding with Russians theory you’ve pushed for over a year?

Ask Guccifer.

[Pavlov]

How many of those indictments have to do with the Trump colluding with Russians theory you’ve pushed for over a year?Since Stone and the HelloFLA dipshit are mentioned in the indictments, I'd say the investigation is getting closer to Trump and the GOP rather than farther.

[TSA]

Because he has to come to the conclusion that his bias did affect these investigations.



The Justice Department's internal watchdog indicated Tuesday that he's examining whether a senior FBI agent’s political bias infected the bureau's decision to open an investigation into the Trump campaign's contacts with Russia.

"That’s a matter we’ve got under review and are looking at right now," Inspector General Michael Horowitz told lawmakers at a hearing on Capitol Hill.”

“Given Strzok’s strong opinions, Horowitz said, he couldn't conclude with confidence that Strzok's personal views didn't bleed into his investigative decisions.”

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/06/19/fbi-watchdog-republicans-respond-653544

[TSA]

Since Stone and the HelloFLA dipshit are mentioned in the indictments, I'd say the investigation is getting closer to Trump and the GOP rather than farther.

That wasn’t an answer to the question try again or next time don’t bother quoting my question if you aren’t going to answer it.

[Pavlov]

The Justice Department's internal watchdog indicated Tuesday that he's examining whether a senior FBI agent’s political bias infected the bureau's decision to open an investigation into the Trump campaign's contacts with Russia.

"That’s a matter we’ve got under review and are looking at right now," Inspector General Michael Horowitz told lawmakers at a hearing on Capitol Hill.”

“Given Strzok’s strong opinions, Horowitz said, he couldn't conclude with confidence that Strzok's personal views didn't bleed into his investigative decisions.”

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/06/19/fbi-watchdog-republicans-respond-653544And?

He has to come to the conclusion that his bias did affect these investigations.

[rmt]

Read the post more carefully next time.

I'm not commenting on whether TSA is correct in his assertions. I'm saying that whatever existed to put Hillary in prison has long since been destroyed.

[Pavlov]

That wasn’t an answer to the question try again or next time don’t bother quoting my question if you aren’t going to answer it.:lol I know I'm right when you get this pissy.

[Pavlov]

I'm not commenting on whether TSA is correct in his assertions. I'm saying that whatever existed to put Hillary in prison has long since been destroyed.My post was about his assertions.

But lol at your thinking email evidence could only be found on one server. What do you think email is?

[djohn2oo8]

:lol I know I'm right when you get this pissy.

:lmao

[TSA]

And?

He has to come to the conclusion that his bias did affect these investigations.

He hasn’t released the report on the Strzok’s actions in the Russia investigation and the FISA warrants yet you’ve already claimed no bias impacted anything. How?

[dabom]

I'm not commenting on whether TSA is correct in his assertions. I'm saying that whatever existed to put Hillary in prison has long since been destroyed.

What happened to "Hillary did it". :lmao

And the government has those emails. That's how the kremlin got them. Nothing really juicy in there. Those emails were posted online already long time ago. :lol

[TSA]

:lol I know I'm right when you get this pissy.

And we both know the answer was ZERO and that’s why you dodged :lol

[dabom]

People looking for a smoking gun in those emails can read them with a 1 min google search. :lol

[Pavlov]

He hasn’t released the report on the Strzok’s actions in the Russia investigation and the FISA warrants yet you’ve already claimed no bias impacted anything. How?Because there is no evidence it did.

If there is evidence it did, I will change my sentence.

See how this works?

Do you understand?

Yes or no.

[Pavlov]

And we both know the answer was ZERO and that’s why you dodged :lolYou ask it every time you get bad news.

You get a lot of bad news. :lol

[TSA]

You ask it every time you get bad news.

You get a lot of bad news. :lolIt’s an easy way to shit down djohn each time he tries to link them to Trump. As you saw it worked, like it does every time.

[TSA]

Because there is no evidence it did.

If there is evidence it did, I will change my sentence.

See how this works?

Do you understand?

Yes or no.

Because you haven’t seen evidence there is no evidence? :lol
No I don’t understand.

[Pavlov]

It’s an easy way to shit down djohn each time he tries to link them to Trump. As you saw it worked, like it does every time.Roger Stone says on national TV he's in the indictment and you try to pretend it's not linked to Trump?

:rollin

[spurraider21]

The #1and #2 have been fired, #2 is charged with a crime. #3 is demoted to HR, reported to FBI OPR, and under investigation. I have confidence the institution is being cleaned and will most definitely survive.


why was the #1 fired
wonder how many times this one will get dodged

[Pavlov]

Because you haven’t seen evidence there is no evidence? :lol
No I don’t understand.What is your evidence proving his bias affected the Russia investigation?

Post it.

[TSA]

wonder how many times this one will get dodged

It’s an impossible question for me to answer that’s why I’ve ignored your repeated attempts. Only Trump can answer your question. But :lol at you still clinging to obstruction of justice leading to impeachment.

[TSA]

Roger Stone says on national TV he's in the indictment and you try to pretend it's not linked to Trump?

:rollin

What crime did Roger Stone commit?

[Pavlov]

It’s an impossible question for me to answer that’s why I’ve ignored your repeated attempts. Only Trump can answer your question.OK.


And, in fact, when I decided to just do it, I said to myself, I said: 'You know, this Russia thing with Trump and Russia is a made up story, it’s an excuse by the Democrats for having lost an election that they should’ve won.'

I'll take his word for it.

Do you?

[Pavlov]

What crime did Roger Stone commit?
https://media1.tenor.com/images/c924b622b71a51d0c4aa21760c69b9f3/tenor.gif:lol TSA

[TSA]

OK.



I'll take his word for it.

Do you?

Where’s the rest of the quote?

[Pavlov]

Where’s the rest of the quote?You are free to post the entire interview if you want.

Question pending:

Do you take his word for it?

[TSA]

:lol TSA

Guccifer had already released the documents when he and Roger Stone communicated. Nothing in the recent indictments is new concerning Stone. There was no collusion between them.

[TSA]

You are free to post the entire interview if you want.

Question pending:

Do you take his word for it?

You’ve already got it lined up if you posted that quote just post the whole thing.

[Pavlov]

Guccifer had already released the documents when he and Roger Stone communicated. Nothing in the recent indictments is new concerning Stone. There was no collusion between them.The word you used is "linked."

It's linked to the Trump campaign.

Sorry. You set the goalpost.


You’ve already got it lined up if you posted that quote just post the whole thing.I do not.

You are free to post the entire interview.

Question pending.

Do you take Trump at his word here?

[spurraider21]

It’s an impossible question for me to answer that’s why I’ve ignored your repeated attempts. Only Trump can answer your question. But :lol at you still clinging to obstruction of justice leading to impeachment.
nah. you pointed to comey's firing as something indicative of the stink/corrosion of the FBI. and yet now you admit you don't even know why he was fired? :lol

[Spurminator]

nah. you pointed to comey's firing as something indicative of the stink/corrosion of the FBI. and yet now you admit you don't even know why he was fired? :lol

:lol

The acrobatics of willful dishonesty. TSA has been training for years and still can't stick a landing.

[Winehole23]

having things both ways is part of the beauty of being a reflexive toady. you can say whatever you want without worrying about consistency because your only consistency is loyalty to faction or leader.

[dabom]

CNN headline "Orange shit criticizes Obama instead of Russia for hacking" :lol

You can't make this shit up. :lol

[Chris]

:cry I didn't really mean it :cry

:lol


1018098957652594688

[Pavlov]

:cry I didn't really mean it :cry

:lol


1018098957652594688:lmao

How was it not a metaphor, Chris?

Explain.

[Chris]

:lmao

How was it not a metaphor, Chris?

Explain.

What was he referring to specifically Pavlov?

[Pavlov]

What was he referring to specifically Pavlov?A metaphor.

[Chris]

A metaphor.

White flag accepted.

[Pavlov]

White flag accepted.No. I answered your question.

The Purple Heart reference was always a metaphor.

I asked you how it was somehow something else and you never answered.

I accept your white flag.

[Chris]

No. I answered your question.

The Purple Heart reference was always a metaphor.

I asked you how it was somehow something else and you never answered.

I accept your white flag.

What is the definition of a metaphor Pavlov? After you figure that out, tell what he was referring to specifically. Thanks.

[Pavlov]

What is the definition of a metaphor Pavlov? After you figure that out, tell what he was referring to specifically. Thanks.noun

a figure of speech in which a word or phrase is applied to an object or action to which it is not literally applicable.

Now explain how it's anything but a metaphor, Chris.

[Chris]

After you figure that out, tell what he was referring to specifically. Thanks.

[Pavlov]

Not my job to explain your alleged point for you.

I accept your white flag.

[Chris]

Your claim was that it was a metaphor and you failed to explain why.

Easy win for team Chris :tu

[Pavlov]

Your claim was that it was a metaphorBecause he wasn't literally suggesting anything.

How could you be this ignorant?

[koriwhat]

:cry I didn't really mean it :cry

:lol


1018098957652594688

he definitely fooled me then... this guy and many others on the wrong side of history were, like i said yesterday, strzok's fluffers.

cohen not only meant what you said but he fluffed strzok for like 20 secs. as did many others which was embarrassing when you're there on part of the US people and you'd rather cheer on strzok than ask serious questions. as well, the fluffing was ridiculous but so was the bringing up issues that don't pertain to this hearing because of trump derangement syndrome. TDS indeed exists; it's alive and well in the hearts and minds of the democratic party no doubt.

this testimony was worthless except for a few gems here and there. the last of which was the closing statement by the chairman. strzok kept deflecting and referring to the gag the fbi has put on his testimony to answer some serious questions.

strzok, like those here who exhibit his same behavior, is an egotistical maniac who feels shielded from any repercussions he would/might endure otherwise. he believes he is untouchable by his words and actions as he shimmy's about with his weasel face and sly smirk. so sickening to think there's more like him, most likely, in the agency who have taken the oath but have no ethics or loyalty.

until next time...

[Chris]

he definitely fooled me then... this guy and many others on the wrong side of history were, like i said yesterday, strzok's fluffers.

cohen not only meant what you said but he fluffed strzok for like 20 secs. as did many others which was embarrassing when you're there on part of the US people and you'd rather cheer on strzok than ask serious questions. as well, the fluffing was ridiculous but so was the bringing up issues that don't pertain to this hearing because of trump derangement syndrome. TDS indeed exists; it's alive and well in the hearts and minds of the democratic party no doubt.

this testimony was worthless except for a few gems here and there. the last of which was the closing statement by the chairman. strzok kept deflecting and referring to the gag the fbi has put on his testimony to answer some serious questions.

strzok, like those here who exhibit his same behavior, is an egotistical maniac who feels shielded from any repercussions he would/might endure otherwise. he believes he is untouchable by his words and actions as he shimmy's about with his weasel face and sly smirk. so sickening to think there's more like him, most likely, in the agency who have taken the oath but have no ethics or loyalty.

until next time...

He didn't expect the veteran backlash and they never forget. He fucked up and now he's backtracking with the metaphor shit.

[koriwhat]

Because he wasn't literally suggesting anything.

How could you be this ignorant?

so, how much of that 10 hr testimony did you watch? it's really like 8 hrs but i doubt you even watched anything more than a mere clip here and there in this thread or on twitter.

what ya say pav? the man of many questions but no answers.

[Chris]

Because he wasn't literally suggesting anything.

How could you be this ignorant?

You completely failed today. I'm disappointed tbh.

[koriwhat]

Because he wasn't literally suggesting anything.

How could you be this ignorant?

did you watch the whole damn thing or just a clip of this particular congressman's time? if you put all the dems fluffing together you can clearly tell they were all on the same page in praising strzok and none of which were bullshitting about it either. i believe cohen to be a complete and utter liar.

[Pavlov]

so, how much of that 10 hr testimony did you watch? it's really like 8 hrs but i doubt you even watched anything more than a mere clip here and there in this thread or on twitter.

what ya say pav? the man of many questions but no answers.I didn't watch much of it since I knew it was a waste of time. These hearings usually are.

I'll ask you what I already asked you and all the other Dennisonistas:

How did his bias affect the investigations?


You completely failed today. I'm disappointed tbh.I know what the summit is about.

Everyone does.

Everyone except you.

lol Chris

[koriwhat]

You completely failed today. I'm disappointed tbh.

he doesn't want to be wrong just like he didn't want hrc to lose. it's all relative to all their TDS and now it all makes sense. it's all about force feeding the masses the lie that trump is out to kill everyone but the rich white demographic. pavTHETIC will argue til he's blue in the face even over shit he knows he's wrong about. cliche.

[Pavlov]

he doesn't want to be wrong just like he didn't want hrc to lose. it's all relative to all their TDS and now it all makes sense. it's all about force feeding the masses the lie that trump is out to kill everyone but the rich white demographic. pavTHETIC will argue til he's blue in the face even over shit he knows he's wrong about. cliche.What am I wrong about here, kori?

[Chris]

he doesn't want to be wrong just like he didn't want hrc to lose. it's all relative to all their TDS and now it all makes sense. it's all about force feeding the masses the lie that trump is out to kill everyone but the rich white demographic. pavTHETIC will argue til he's blue in the face even over shit he knows he's wrong about. cliche.

He's easy pickins' :lol

[koriwhat]

How did his bias affect the investigations?

i could easily answer this question because i did watch the whole damn testimony over a span of 2 days. you'd get your answer too if you as amendment about seeking the truth as you are with your merry-go-round schtick. the answer's in the testimony and it's not my job to provide it to you. good luck pavTHETIC!

[Chris]

i could easily answer this question because i did watch the whole damn testimony over a span of 2 days. you'd get your answer too if you as amendment about seeking the truth as you are with your merry-go-round schtick. the answer's in the testimony and it's not my job to provide it to you. good luck pavTHETIC!

:tu I've watched about 1-2 hours so far. I'm doing it piecemeal.

[Pavlov]

i could easily answer this question because i did watch the whole damn testimony over a span of 2 days. you'd get your answer too if you as amendment about seeking the truth as you are with your merry-go-round schtick. the answer's in the testimony and it's not my job to provide it to you. good luck pavTHETIC!I accept your white flag too.

There is no evidence his bias affected any investigation.

You are free to show me any evidence you have that it did.

[koriwhat]

what i find funny about all this is the fact that i'm probably the only one here that watches all these damn open testimony sessions(i actually find them interesting but then again i used to sit in and record depositions) but am constantly shitted on because i don't bow down to those who don't watch these testimonies. from here on out, if you aren't on the same page then don't ask me to answer any of your dumbass questions.

[Pavlov]

what i find funny about all this is the fact that i'm probably the only one here that watches all these damn open testimony sessions(i actually find them interesting but then again i used to sit in and record depositions) but am constantly shitted on because i don't bow down to those who don't watch these testimonies. from here on out, if you aren't on the same page then don't ask me to answer any of your dumbass questions.You have no evidence his bias affected any investigation.

Period.

[koriwhat]

I accept your white flag too.

There is no evidence his bias affected any investigation.

You are free to show me any evidence you have that it did.

again, you are of the hivemind that i can't stand. i won't be force feeding you a damn thing ever again. after watching this testimony and finding out you watched none of it, as you parade around here as mr. knowitall, i have come to the conclusion you are simply a troll. you give input from time to time but you're mainly and simply a troll.

if you were really concerned to find the truth you would've watched or listen to this testimony from strzok but you didn't and now you want me to hold your hand. ain't happening.

https://www.c-span.org/video/?447953-1/fbi-deputy-assistant-director-peter-strzok-testifies-2016-investigations

[Pavlov]

again, you are of the hivemind that i can't stand. i won't be force feeding you a damn thing ever again. after watching this testimony and finding out you watched none of it, as you parade around here as mr. knowitall, i have come to the conclusion you are simply a troll. you give input from time to time but you're mainly and simply a troll.

if you were really concerned to find the truth you would've watched or listen to this testimony from strzok but you didn't and now you want me to hold your hand. ain't happening.

https://www.c-span.org/video/?447953-1/fbi-deputy-assistant-director-peter-strzok-testifies-2016-investigations

Don't need to watch the whole thing at all.

You have no evidence his bias affected any investigation.

No one who spoke in that hearing presented any.

Period.

[koriwhat]

:tu I've watched about 1-2 hours so far. I'm doing it piecemeal.

that's way more than mr. knowitall pavTHETIC. :tu

[koriwhat]

You have no evidence his bias affected any investigation.

i don't need it. you do.

[Pavlov]

i don't need it.Yes, you don't need any proof of anything.

You just want your feelings and prejudices to be reinforced.

I do need proof and evidence.

[koriwhat]

Yes, you don't need any proof of anything.

You just want your feelings and prejudices to be reinforced.

I do need proof and evidence.

not at all. just sick of being told this or that by you and you choose not even to watch this testimony session. gfy man until you realize you're like a baker telling a doctor how to do a heart transplant and not backing down one way or the other even when you have no clue what you speak of.

[Chris]

Don't need to watch the whole thing at all.

You have no evidence his bias affected any investigation.

No one who spoke in that hearing presented any.

Period.

You already got your marching orders from Cuomo and Tapper. I can see why you don't want to watch it.

[Pavlov]

not at all. just sick of being told this or that by you and you choose not even to watch this testimony session. gfy man until you realize you're like a baker telling a doctor how to do a heart transplant and not backing down one way or the other even when you have no clue what you speak of.Were there any evidence his bias affected any investigation presented at the hearing, it would have already been reported.

That's how these things work.

Turns out there was no such evidence at that hearing.

Pretty simple.

[Pavlov]

You already got your marching orders from Cuomo and Tapper. I can see why you don't want to watch it.You are free to post any evidence his bias affected any investigation at any time.

I will read it.

[koriwhat]

Were there any evidence his bias affected any investigation presented at the hearing, it would have already been reported.

That's how these things work.

Turns out there was no such evidence at that hearing.

Pretty simple.

you know what's simple pavTHETIC? opening that link i posted and grabbing some popcorn.

[Pavlov]

you know what's simple pavTHETIC? opening that link i posted and grabbing some popcorn.No need.

I already know there was no such evidence at that hearing.

Pretty simple.

You know it too.

[koriwhat]

No need.

I already know there was no such evidence at that hearing.

Pretty simple.

You know it too.

so then why keep going back and forth with me. you already know my answer so stfu already then.

[Pavlov]

so then why keep going back and forth with me. you already know my answer so stfu already then.It's easy to acknowledge that no such evidence was presented at the hearing.

You'd rather go back and forth than simply admit that fact.

[Chris]

lol no evidence besides Strzok admitting the FBI got the dossier from Ohr

lol "I won't watch it but I already know everything about it" Pavlov

[Pavlov]

lol no evidence besides Strzok admitting the FBI got the dossier from Ohr

lol "I won't watch it but I already know everything about it" PavlovWhy are you talking about the dossier?

We were talking about evidence of Strzok's bias affecting any investigation.

lol Chris is trying to change the subject.

[koriwhat]

It's easy to acknowledge that no such evidence was presented at the hearing.

You'd rather go back and forth than simply admit that fact.

i'm not doing your homework for you. you come here with your condescending attitude, your ego, and your demands as if you're owed anything. you don't put the leg work in and that's on you, not me.


lol no evidence besides Strzok admitting the FBI got the dossier from Ohr

lol "I won't watch it but I already know everything about it" Pavlov

after he deflected i don't know how many times and then tried again after admitting to such things... dude's a crook.

[Chris]

Why are you talking about the dossier?

We were talking about evidence of Strzok's bias affecting any investigation.

lol Chris is trying to change the subject.

So your God Mueller fired Strzok without any evidence? lol Pavlov

[koriwhat]

Why are you talking about the dossier?

We were talking about evidence of Strzok's bias affecting any investigation.

lol Chris is trying to change the subject.

nah, he's saying exactly what most should be saying here. you talk out your ass and expect everyone to hold your hand as you talk down to them. you are exactly who i thought you were.

[Pavlov]

i'm not doing your homework for you. you come here with your condescending attitude, your ego, and your demands as if you're owed anything. you don't put the leg work in and that's on you, not me.There was no evidence presented in the hearing.

Period.

There's nothing you can do about it.


after he deflected i don't know how many times and then tried again after admitting to such things... dude's a crook.Since that had nothing to do with Strzok, I'm just laughing at you too

[Pavlov]

nah, he's saying exactly what most should be saying here. you talk out your ass and expect everyone to hold your hand as you talk down to them. you are exactly who i thought you were.Nah, he's talking about something Strzok had nothing to do with.

You should remember that from watching the entire hearing.

Don't you remember that?

[koriwhat]

Since that had nothing to do with Strzok, I'm just laughing at you too

you're pavTHETIC and to your core man.

[Pavlov]

you're pavTHETIC and to your core man.As someone who watched the entire hearing, you know that had nothing to do with Strzok.

[Trill Clinton]

trump and putin one on one meeting:

qvWv3uosN9E

[koriwhat]

As someone who watched the entire hearing, you know that had nothing to do with Strzok.

you mean the lead agent of the investigation... yeah, nothing to do with him. you know nothing and it's rearing its ugly face more and more by the day. :tu

leave me be from here on out buddy. i don't have time for bullshitters like yourself.

[koriwhat]

trump and putin one on one meeting:

qvWv3uosN9E

did you say the same when obama was hot mic'd and whispering sweet nothings into putin's ear?

[dabom]

trump and putin one on one meeting:

qvWv3uosN9E

More like pimp and prostitute. :lmao

[koriwhat]

More like pimp and prostitute. :lmao

you would know ladyboy.

[Trill Clinton]

did you say the same when obama was hot mic'd and whispering sweet nothings into putin's ear?

no because that never happened

[koriwhat]

no because that never happened

yeah it most definitely did. however, i already knew the answer to my own question because i knew you're a part of the hive mind too. good luck with that! :tu

[Trill Clinton]

yeah it most definitely did. however, i already knew the answer to my own question because i knew you're a part of the hive mind too. good luck with that! :tu

Post the link, please? I couldn't find anything that's why I said it didn't happen.

[koriwhat]

Post the link, please? I couldn't find anything that's why I said it didn't happen.

it's out there. are you the new pavTHETIC or am i tripping?

[Trill Clinton]

it's out there. are you the new pavTHETIC or am i tripping?

You're tripping and lying. We're done here.

[koriwhat]

You're tripping and lying. We're done here.

i might be very forgetful with posts and what not but i never try to lie here or off the net. i'm def not lying on this issue. the internet is vast and your google skills are lackluster.

[koriwhat]

...

[GB20]

As someone who watched the entire hearing, you know that had nothing to do with Strzok.
:lol

[GB20]

As someone who watched the entire hearing, you know that had nothing to do with Strzok.
:lol

[djohn2oo8]

lol KW

[koriwhat]

lol KW

lmao i got dabum mixed up with you...

[koriwhat]

:lol

you can laugh all you want but bruce ohr and peter strzok def had something to do with each other. nelly ohr, fusion gps, special council, strzok and ohr! yall some dimwitted cliquish losers.

[djohn2oo8]

you can laugh all you want but bruce ohr and peter strzok def had something to do with each other. nelly ohr, fusion gps, special council, strzok and ohr! yall some dimwitted cliquish losers.

Where da proof?

[koriwhat]

Where da proof?

Where's the proof? Lmao how about strzok's testimony proving such nonsense? Then again, you didn't watch it so why the fuck chime in loser?

[DMC]

It's all a dog and pony show to hide the real shit. Not surprising most of you faggots here taking it Hook Line & Sinker.

[Pavlov]

It's all a dog and pony show to hide the real shit. Not surprising most of you faggots here taking it Hook Line & Sinker.
What's the real shit?

[Chris]

What's the real shit?

1019266780265578501

[Pavlov]

1019266780265578501:lmao Loomer

What happened to her Las Vegas shooter story, Chris?

[Ef-man]

Government to pay former FBI officials $2 million in settlements over release of anti-Yam Tits texts

Ex-FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page reached settlements with the Justice Department that will see the government paying out a total of $2 million in their lawsuits over the department’s 2018 release of their text messages.

Former agent Strzok will get $1.2 million and Page, who was an FBI lawyer, will get $800,000, according to settlement agreements obtained by CNN.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/26/politics/peter-strzok-lisa-page-fbi-settlement-doj/index.html

[Winehole23]

wrongful termination lawsuits pending, maladministration is expensive

[Thread]

wrongful termination lawsuits pending, maladministration is expensive

...so is FULL RIDE health-care, but millions of Nazi's in Ukraine have been getting it free of charge from America...

https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/41xetrwU5KL._AC_UF894,1000_QL80_.jpg

Ya had the SS stand down as well a fortnight ago today.

Fuckin' animal, you.