Death Of A Nation

[Monostradamus]

Currently 0% on Rotten Tomatoes and 1/100 on Metacritic :lmao

Any reviews from the Trumptard crowd? Chris Spurtacular koriwhat DarrinS SnakeBoy TSA ducks? Did you watch it yet Fabbs aka ShrimplyPibbles? Did anyone of you jizz in your pants at the lib owning lulz?

[Spurtacular]

I've not seen it; but if RT is at zero percent, then that speaks to their own lack of reliability / getting a critical mass of reviews.

[koriwhat]

Currently 0% on Rotten Tomatoes and 1/100 on Metacritic :lmao

Any reviews from the Trumptard crowd? Chris Spurtacular koriwhat DarrinS SnakeBoy TSA ducks? Did you watch it yet Fabbs aka ShrimplyPibbles? Did anyone of you jizz in your pants at the lib owning lulz?

funny you mention me. i haven't seen it so what's your point fat fuck?

here's a playlist for your couch potato having ass...
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/6/6a/Super_Size_Me_Poster.jpg/220px-Super_Size_Me_Poster.jpg
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/3c/Fed_Up_poster.jpg/220px-Fed_Up_poster.jpg
https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BODg4NTEwNjU0OV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMjE4ODQ0Mg@@._ V1_UY268_CR4,0,182,268_AL_.jpg

[Pavlov]

I've not seen it; but if RT is at zero percent, then that speaks to their own lack of reliability / getting a critical mass of reviews.lol another conapiracy

[Spurtacular]

lol another conapiracy

That's analysis, not a conspiracy.

You're cuck Blake level posting at this point.

:rollin

[koriwhat]

That's analysis, not a conspiracy.

You're cuck Blake level posting at this point.

:rollin

blake's more insightful tbh. lol

even if blake and i insult each other daily i'd still rather deal with him than lame ass pavTHETIC.

[Pavlov]

That's analysis, not a conspiracy.

You're cuck Blake level posting at this point.

:rollinMaybe the movie is just really that bad.

Movies can be that bad.

lol "analysis"

[SnakeBoy]

Getting good reviews from the audience

"Two kinds of people will enjoy this brilliant movie--patriotic Americans and viewers who are open minded enough to have not yet drunk the toxic Kool-aid of the left. Two kinds of people will condemn this brilliant movie (in most if not all cases without even viewing it)-the toxic left and the low information people who rely on the propaganda of the mainstream media. Here's a quote from the greatest hits of minister Goebbels: "If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State." The modern iteration of this principle as peddled by the true colluders, the democrat party and the state controlled media, is "you can get them to believe any lie you want by just getting it out there through the mainstream media and just KSI--Keep Sayin' It!" 0% rating by the State Controlled media vs 71% by audience is the big lie in action."

[SnakeBoy]

"Ignore the liberal critics. Historically accurate. The truth hurts huh dems. Hillary is satan incarnate and America realized it just in time. Trump wasn't my first choice by far but his policies work, obviously to anyone one with a brain. (This would exclude CNN, MSNCB, etc)"

[Pavlov]

"Ignore the liberal critics. Historically accurate. The truth hurts huh dems. Hillary is satan incarnate and America realized it just in time. Trump wasn't my first choice by far but his policies work, obviously to anyone one with a brain. (This would exclude CNN, MSNCB, etc)"Do you believe Hillary is Satan incarnate, SnakeBoy?

[Spurtacular]

Maybe the movie is just really that bad.

Movies can be that bad.

lol "analysis"

:lmao "Maybe" said in a mealy mouth manner.

I've seen a couple of his movies, which were well received by its target audience. This one seemed to be in the same vein.

And yes, analysis, son. You should try it some time. You've been grudge posting in one thread after another; a lot of acting out.

[Spurminator]

Getting good "reviews" from the "audience"

[Pavlov]

:lmao "Maybe" said in a mealy mouth manner.OK, it probably just really is that bad.


I've seen a couple of his movies, which were well received by its target audience. This one seemed to be in the same vein. Are you in the target audience?

What is that target audience?

Give us your analysis.

[Spurminator]

His movies are an idiot tax. More power to him. It's not like he's changing votes, he's just reinforcing the paranoia of the susceptible and the unintelligent who have already decided how they're going to vote.

[Spurtacular]

OK, it probably just really is that bad.


And you base this on what?

[Pavlov]

And you base this on what?His movies.

Are you in the target audience?

What is that target audience?

Give us your analysis.

[koriwhat]

where's fat fuck mono at to chime in on his shit thread? yo obese fat fuck we need your input so put that pizza down and get in here you slob!

[Spurtacular]

His movies.


That's an inept answer. What methodology are you using to determine that a zero percent approval rating is spot on?

[Spurtacular]

His movies are an idiot tax. More power to him. It's not like he's changing votes, he's just reinforcing the paranoia of the susceptible and the unintelligent who have already decided how they're going to vote.

:lol Trying to cope.

[Pavlov]

That's an inept answer. What methodology are you using to determine that a zero percent approval rating is spot on?I watched his movies.

They are terrible.

I can understand why every serious critic would say they are terrible, though I admit I am probably not in his target audience.

Are you in the target audience?

What is that target audience?

Give us your analysis.

[Spurminator]

:lol Trying to cope.

That doesn't make any sense.

Go see the movie. Tell us what you think.

[Spurtacular]

I watched his movies.

They are terrible.

I can understand why every serious critic would say they are terrible, though I admit I am probably not in his target audience.



Slob didn't bother to link his OP. I had guessed the zero was an audience score for him to make a big deal and post an OP on it (obviously, I gave him too much credit). The audience score is 74 and the corporate critics are at 0.

ElNono (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=8054) believes there's no major disconnect / agenda opposite of the people. This just blasts him and you chump in the face.

[Pavlov]

Slob didn't bother to link his OP. I had guessed the zero was an audience score for him to make a big deal and post an OP on it (obviously, I gave him too much credit). The audience score is 74 and the corporate critics are at 0.

ElNono (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=8054) believes there's no major disconnect / agenda opposite of the people. This just blasts him and you chump in the face.Oh I think the target audience will love it and be just as militant about it as you are without even seeing it.

Are you in the target audience?

What is that target audience?

Give us your analysis.

[Spurminator]

Audience scores are worthless for controversial movies. Anyone can write anything they want as a review. It doesn't mean they've seen it, and it certainly doesn't speak to the objective quality.

But you'll probably like it. So you should go see it and report back.

[Spurtacular]

That doesn't make any sense.

Go see the movie. Tell us what you think.

It makes plenty of sense. The objective of this movie is two fold (profit motive aside):

1. Rally the base.
2. Win hearts and minds.

Your denial of the second is you coping.

[Spurtacular]

Oh I think the target audience will love it and be just as militant about it as you are without even seeing it.

Are you in the target audience?

What is that target audience?

Give us your analysis.

I'm not answering mundane questions. If you have a clear line of convo you should get on with it.

[Pavlov]

It makes plenty of sense. The objective of this movie is two fold (profit motive aside):

1. Rally the base.
2. Win hearts and minds.

Your denial of the second is you coping.Are you the base?

Has he won your heart and mind with his movies you watched?

Give us your analysis.

[Pavlov]

I'm not answering mundane questions. If you have a clear line of convo you should get on with it.This thread is about the movie Death Of A Nation.

You brought up the target audience for that movie.

I am asking you if you are in that target audience.

Are you in that target audience?

[Spurtacular]

Are you the base?

Has he won your heart and mind with his movies you watched?

Give us your analysis.

Why are you overly worried about the effects of his movies on me personally?

[Spurminator]

It makes plenty of sense. The objective of this movie is two fold (profit motive aside):

1. Rally the base.
2. Win hearts and minds.

:lol This is you coping.

Seriously, go spend $15 on it. You'll love it. Plus it's an opportunity to go outside and experience civilization for a couple of hours. It's good to be around people.

[koriwhat]

Why are you overly worried about the effects of his movies on me personally?

because he saw it and doesn't want to admit it. he knows he's wrong about everything in this world but refuses to accept it. lmao

[Spurtacular]

This thread is about the movie Death Of A Nation.

You brought up the target audience for that movie.

I am asking you if you are in that target audience.

Are you in that target audience?

I don't see relevance. The current relevance is 74 percent of the audience liked it compared to zero for the system critics.

[koriwhat]

:lol This is you coping.

Seriously, go spend $15 on it. You'll love it. Plus it's an opportunity to go outside and experience civilization for a couple of hours. It's good to be around people.

yo spurtacular, this is coming from a dude who has 6k more posts than you. lmao!

[Spurtacular]

because he saw it and doesn't want to admit it. he knows he's wrong about everything in this world but refuses to accept it. lmao

I doubt he saw it. And that's not it in any event. He wants to go down a rabbit hole is all.

[Pavlov]

Why are you overly worried about the effects of his movies on me personally?I am not worried about you at all.

I am asking you simple questions about this filmmaker's movies based on your analysis.

1. Rally the base.
2. Win hearts and minds.

Are you in the base for which you say this film is largely made?

Has the filmmaker won your heart and mind with his movies you watched like you say he is trying to do?

[Pavlov]

I don't see relevance. The current relevance is 74 percent of the audience liked it compared to zero for the system critics.You brought up the target audience for that movie.

I am asking you if you are in that target audience.

Are you in that target audience?

It's a simple question since you know yourself and you know the target audience.

[Spurtacular]

:lol This is you coping.

Seriously, go spend $15 on it. You'll love it. Plus it's an opportunity to go outside and experience civilization for a couple of hours. It's good to be around people.

You're lashing out now. Don't say stupid liberal cheerleader stuff if you don't want to be called out on it.

[Spurminator]

yo spurtacular, this is coming from a dude who has 6k more posts than you. lmao!

:lol Check the join dates, Mensa.

You should get out and see it too. Maybe the two of you can carpool.

[ElNono]

Slob didn't bother to link his OP. I had guessed the zero was an audience score for him to make a big deal and post an OP on it (obviously, I gave him too much credit). The audience score is 74 and the corporate critics are at 0.

ElNono (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=8054) believes there's no major disconnect / agenda opposite of the people. This just blasts him and you chump in the face.

I’ll be happy to opine about the movie if/when I watch it. I get that watching this movie is akin to watching an Obama special on HBO, so it doesn’t strike me as something I want to do anytime soon.

And who are these ‘people’ you speak of? Last I checked democracy largely works, despite whether you agree or not with the results.

[koriwhat]

:lol Check the join dates, Mensa.

You should get out and see it too. Maybe the two of you can carpool.

fuck your join date mr 28k pushing 29k.

[Spurminator]

You're lashing out now. Don't say stupid liberal cheerleader stuff if you don't want to be called out on it.

Now you're projecting and assuming what I do and don't want.

I'm making fun of you. It's pretty simple.

[Spurtacular]

Audience scores are worthless for controversial movies. Anyone can write anything they want as a review. It doesn't mean they've seen it, and it certainly doesn't speak to the objective quality.

But you'll probably like it. So you should go see it and report back.

74 percent means that the base mostly liked it. And I would guess it's much higher and that liberal trolls are just voting it down. A ticket ID is not required to rate the movie.

[Spurminator]

fuck your join date mr 28k pushing 29k.

Yeah fuck math! Good call, Mensa.

I can see why you developed into such a gold standard of intellect and controlled emotions.

[Spurtacular]

Last I checked democracy largely works, despite whether you agree or not with the results.

Sure, democracy largely works, whatever that means. But there are still major consequences to government resembling a lead corporation.

[Spurminator]

74 percent means that the base mostly liked it.

Very good, you did it!


A ticket ID is not required to rate the movie.

Generally speaking, when you're thinking about seeing a movie, do you want to hear a review from someone who hasn't seen it?

[koriwhat]

Yeah fuck math! Good call, Mensa.

I can see why you developed into such a gold standard of intellect and controlled emotions.

i'm not gold standard by any means of the phrase... "but but but i joined in 2003 so give me a break!"

hey man, when you want to start claiming we all have no lives but you lead a very adventurous one then you'll keep getting called out 28k times over.

[Spurtacular]

I’ll be happy to opine about the movie if/when I watch it. I get that watching this movie is akin to watching an Obama special on HBO.

I saw one or two of his productions. They're well done in terms of putting forth a speculative case based on supporting evidence. Obviously, there's some level of conjecture. They're pretty well done from a cinematic p.o.v.

[Spurtacular]

Very good, you did it!



Generally speaking, when you're thinking about seeing a movie, do you want to hear a review from someone who hasn't seen it?

For why are you asking this retarded question?

[ElNono]

I’m more into action flicks for entertainment. I’ll probably catch the new Mission Impossible. Seems it was getting rave reviews.

[Spurminator]

i'm not gold standard by any means of the phrase... "but but but i joined in 2003 so give me a break!"

hey man, when you want to start claiming we all have no lives but you lead a very adventurous one then you'll keep getting called out 28k times over.

:lol I'm not asking for a break. I don't have any regrets over the amount of time I've spent here, and my comments about you and Derp's social lives don't have anything to do with the number of posts you have. You brought up post count, not me.

[Spurminator]

I’m more into action flicks for entertainment. I’ll probably catch the new Mission Impossible. Seems it was getting rave reviews.

I haven't seen any of those since MI:2. Planning to catch up based on what I've heard about the last few. I still get a little weirded out watching Tom Cruise.

[ElNono]

MI2 was probably the worst one. Been going up ever since, IMO

[Spurtacular]

I’m more into action flicks for entertainment. I’ll probably catch the new Mission Impossible. Seems it was getting rave reviews.

I would rather see a good movie unless I'm in a mood. The time or two I did see his stuff it was in a run-up to an election and as a matinee; so for me, it was sort of like attending a pep rally.

[Pavlov]

I saw one or two of his productions. They're well done in terms of putting forth a speculative case based on supporting evidence. Obviously, there's some level of conjecture. They're pretty well done from a cinematic p.o.v.Would you say you are in his target audience?

Are you the base you say he makes the movies for?

Did he win your heart and mind with his movies?

[Spurminator]

For why are you asking this retarded question?

You said a ticket ID is not required, so you seem to be acknowledging that people are rating it without seeing it. That being the case, why do you care what the audience review is?

I mean, hypothetically speaking, even if the audience score was 10% you'd just say it was because of liberals dragging the rating down. So you seem to have made your mind up about the movie regardless, just like the "base" who is predisposed to like this movie and therefore will rate it positively whether or not it has objective merits as a film.

So you should just go see it.

[Spurtacular]

Would you say you are in his target audience?

Are you the base you say he makes the movies for?

Did he win your heart and mind with his movies?

Why do you insist on ruining every thread this way? You're basically a pariah.

[Pavlov]

Why do you insist on ruining every thread this way? You're basically a pariah.Why don't you just answer the questions?

I'll grant that you admitted to being in the target audience and base since you actually went out and saw it in a theater, so just answer the last one.

Did he win your heart and mind?

[koriwhat]

:lol I'm not asking for a break. I don't have any regrets over the amount of time I've spent here, and my comments about you and Derp's social lives don't have anything to do with the number of posts you have. You brought up post count, not me.

it begs to question your insults... you claim we both have no lives outside ST. i beg to differ. i can point to your post count and question your use of time too. how ironic huh?

[Spurtacular]

You said a ticket ID is not required, so you seem to be acknowledging that people are rating it without seeing it. That being the case, why do you care what the audience review is?

I mean, hypothetically speaking, even if the audience score was 10% you'd just say it was because of liberals dragging the rating down. So you seem to have made your mind up about the movie regardless, just like the "base" who is predisposed to like this movie and therefore will rate it positively regardless of its objective merits as a film.

So you should just go see it.

I explained why. The 74 percent is an indicator that the movie is something the target audience liked. It's significantly high given the likelihood that trolls are artificially reducing the score. My best guess would be that this is a 85-90 percent or better movie otherwise.

You're trying to make a case that I'm mindlessly doing this or that. I've already said I'm familiar with his work. I have a good idea of what the movie is likely going to be like. I dunno why given that that you think it's so important that I go out and see it.

[Spurminator]

it begs to question your insults... you claim we both have no lives outside ST. i beg to differ. i can point to your post count and question your use of time too. how ironic huh?

"It begs to question"?

You're absolutely free to claim time-use scoreboard on behalf of someone who has 80% the number of posts in 20% of the tenure. It's dumb, but it's certainly permissible.

[spurraider21]

MI2 was probably the worst one. Been going up ever since, IMO
yep

imo the last 3 have been the best 3

[AaronY]

I haven't seen any of those since MI:2. Planning to catch up based on what I've heard about the last few. I still get a little weirded out watching Tom Cruise.
They're all pretty much great except for MI:2 which is trash. The ending of 1 is stupid but I still liked the movie overall

[AaronY]

Here's another way to look at the reviews for it:

Chris, Derptacular, and KW think its good

Most damning critical appraisal I can see tbh

[Spurminator]

I explained why. The 74 percent is an indicator that the movie is something the target audience liked. It's significantly high given the likelihood that trolls are artificially reducing the score. My best guess would be that this is a 85-90 percent or better movie otherwise.

This theory basically assumes that the positive reviews are largely from people who have seen the movie while the negative reviews are largely people who haven't. You acknowledge that partisans one side would attempt to influence the score without seeing the movie, but can't imagine partisans on the other side would do the same thing.

What I'm saying is they're both doing it. A substantial number of the positive and negative ratings for this movie are from people who haven't seen it. You can tell based on the number of reviews. It has over 800 user reviews. By comparison, "The Spy Who Dumped Me," which is showing in 3x as many theaters and has sold 2x as many tickets per theater has a little over 1000.


You're trying to make a case that I'm mindlessly doing this or that. I've already said I'm familiar with his work. I have a good idea of what the movie is likely going to be like. I dunno why given that that you think it's so important that I go out and see it.

I assure you that I couldn't possibly care less if you go see it or not. Don't mistake my mockery for interest.

[Spurtacular]

This theory basically assumes that the positive reviews are largely from people who have seen the movie while the negative reviews are largely people who haven't. You acknowledge that partisans one side would attempt to influence the score without seeing the movie, but can't imagine partisans on the other side would do the same thing.

What I'm saying is they're both doing it. A substantial number of the positive and negative ratings for this movie are from people who haven't seen it. You can tell based on the number of reviews. It has over 800 user reviews. By comparison, "The Spy Who Dumped Me," which is showing in 3x as many theaters and has sold 2x as many tickets per theater has a little over 1000.



I assure you that I couldn't possibly care less if you go see it or not. Don't mistake my mockery for interest.

It's simple math Spurmy that you could've done. Whether you suck at simple math or are just hoping I suck at simple math I don't know.

Sure, there are some cons who didn't see the movie who voted it up. But any con who cares that much is going to be predisposed to watch it and give it a good rating anyway. Whereas, liberals trolls are not paying to go watch the movie when they vote it down. 74 percent is basically a min floor and as I said an indicator that the movie hits a high standard for what it is.

If you took 500 liberals and 500 conservatives and forced them to watch the movie would it be 74 percent? It might be 60 percent. But it's obviously stupid to see it that way. I'm sure cartoon movies that get 95 percent is based on the target audience and not gen pop.

I don't know how repeatedly encouraging someone to watch a movie is mockery. It seems to me that you maybe want a review from someone you know :lol

[Spurtacular]

Here's another way to look at the reviews for it:

Chris, Derptacular, and KW think its good

Most damning critical appraisal I can see tbh

None of us have reviewed the movie. Try reading the thread next time, dipshit.

:lmao "nother level"

[koriwhat]

Here's another way to look at the reviews for it:

Chris, Derptacular, and KW think its good

Most damning critical appraisal I can see tbh

how so if i have never seen this movie? jump to conclusions much?

[koriwhat]

but hey spurtacular we're the conspiracy theorists right? lmao! the hacks are showing their true colors today in just this thread.

[Winehole23]

just think...the possibility of meeting Dinesh D'Souza fans IRL.

who could possibly resist?

[AaronY]

None of us have reviewed the movie. Try reading the thread next time, dipshit.

:lmao "nother level"


how so if i have never seen this movie? jump to conclusions much?
Oh missed that lol.

Youll both see it and like it tho

[Monostradamus]

:lmao furiously semen shielding a movie they haven’t seen.

[baseline bum]

:lmao furiously semen shielding a movie they haven’t seen.

Imagine if they actually liked the movie.

[SnakeBoy]

Seems pretty accurate tbh


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXPhLXuJ90I

[Pavlov]

Seems pretty accurate tbh


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXPhLXuJ90I:lmao What a rube to say that.

[Winehole23]

put it in a nutshell, SnakeBoy. what hits home for you?

[boutons_deux]

"can we save America a second time"

from whom? from what?

( I'm sure he gives the wrong culprits, because the culprit fucking up America is HIS side)

[Spurminator]

put it in a nutshell, SnakeBoy. what hits home for you?

I think it's the LOLTRIGGERLIBS part.

[ElNono]

Seems pretty accurate tbh

:lol

[Chris]

86%! :lmao

lol mono

1026174417397866496

[Monostradamus]

0% still :lmao Dinesh D’Felon :lmao

[Spurminator]

"actually buy tickets" :lol

[Spurminator]

I will agree on one thing, his followers certainly are disconnected.

[Chris]

1026198781828755462

lol

[Monostradamus]

Didn’t even crack the top 10 on opening weekend :lmao only $2.3M in over 1000 theaters :lmao his own semen shielders won’t even watch his shitty movie :lmao Dinesh D’Felon :lmao

[Spurminator]

Gullible Chris and his dumb Twitter sources... Didn't even click the link.


But D’Souza’s fourth film has posted the lowest opening weekend of his career, with $2.3 million from 1,032 screens for a per screen average of $2,248.... Comparing box office takes, D’Souza’s 2012 debut film, “2016: Obama’s America,” had a wide opening of $6.5 million from 1,091 screens for a per screen average of $6,000....Four years later, D’Souza released “Hillary’s America: The Secret History of the Democratic Party,” which opened to just under $4 million from 1,217 screens and went on to gross $13 million during its run. Now, “Death of a Nation” will need to leg out with older Trump supporters to have a chance of reaching $10 million.


That average, btw, places it 19th for the weekend. :lmao

:cry but muh wiredsources tweet said it wuz solid :cry

[Pavlov]

:lol No idea why it had that wide a release. My conspiracy theory is that followers with Amazon Prime just keep looping his earlier films to give the illusion of demand.

Still OK numbers for terrible propaganda films tho. Zealots be zealots.

[Spurminator]

This flick didn't even meet the per-screen average of the documentary "Three Identical Strangers," which has been out since June.

(Produced by CNN by the way :wow)

[Pavlov]

This flick didn't even meet the per-screen average of the documentary "Three Identical Strangers," which has been out since June.

(Produced by CNN by the way :wow)That one sounds fascinating. May need to hit the Arbor to see that one.

[Spurminator]

That one sounds fascinating. May need to hit the Arbor to see that one.

It's pretty good. Definitely fascinating. I had some issues with the third act but I don't want to give anything away.

[Pavlov]

It's pretty good. Definitely fascinating. I had some issues with the third act but I don't want to give anything away.I can see that happening from what I've already read.

[Pavlov]

But seriously, D'Souza's Obama doc didn't age well at all. But people who believed that shit and the scary black preacher and scary white former radical stories just kept doubling down with #pizzagate and now QAnon.

It's embarrassing that Americans can delude themselves so thoroughly over simple political disagreements.

[pgardn]

Seems pretty accurate tbh

]

tbhonestly ignorant of how the political parties have changed...

Wow...

[Pavlov]

Yeah, you gotta love how Republicans never can admit the southern strategy was a real thing and it was based mainly on race.

[Spurtacular]

But seriously, D'Souza's Obama doc didn't age well at all. But people who believed that shit and the scary black preacher and scary white former radical stories just kept doubling down with #pizzagate and now QAnon.

It's embarrassing that Americans can delude themselves so thoroughly over simple political disagreements.

Obama hung out with radicals. His policies, actions, results were consistent with that. :lol That you're still bitter about D'Souza calling him out.

[ElNono]

But seriously, D'Souza's Obama doc didn't age well at all. But people who believed that shit and the scary black preacher and scary white former radical stories just kept doubling down with #pizzagate and now QAnon.

It's embarrassing that Americans can delude themselves so thoroughly over simple political disagreements.

I don't waste my time. Same with Moore films... but there's certainly an audience for confirmation bias flicks...

[Spurtacular]

I don't waste my time. Same with Moore films... but there's certainly an audience for confirmation bias flicks...

Moore has no problem with lying. D'Souza deals in facts; that's why chump had to rely on saying his conclusions were wild.

[Chris]

Moore has no problem with lying. D'Souza deals in facts; that's why chump had to rely on saying his conclusions were wild.

D'Souza teaching people about the history of the DemoKKKrats is devastating to their party. Moore is a fat fuck who is only interested in lining his pockets and wearing a pussy hat.

[Winehole23]

the respective party histories didn't end in 1965; as predicted muscular civil rights legislation in the US augured realignment.

it's straight up hilarious to pretend the history of the Democratic party has been hidden from people or kept under wraps, and more hilarious still for the the Republican party to pose, in 2018, as liberators of black America.

[Chris]

the respective party histories didn't end in 1965; as predicted muscular civil rights legislation in the US augured realignment.

it's straight up hilarious to pretend the history of the Democratic party has been hidden from people or kept under wraps, and more hilarious still for the the Republican party to pose, in 2018, as liberators of black America.

Did you learn in your school that the Democrats started the KKK? I didn't see it in any of my books. Did the Department of Education liberate our children or suppress their creativity?

[spurraider21]

Moore has no problem with lying. D'Souza deals in facts.
:lmao

[Pavlov]

Moore has no problem with lying. D'Souza deals in facts:lmao

[Spurtacular]

^^^

Lite and Lite-er acting out. :lol

[Winehole23]

Did you learn in your school that the Democrats started the KKK? I didn't see it in any of my books.I'm not to blame for your ignorance of American history.

[Spurtacular]

I'm not to blame for your ignorance of American history.

You didn't answer the question.

Did you learn in your school that the Democrats started the KKK?

[Winehole23]

Absolutely.

Contextually there's more than enough to figure that out.

After the Lincoln freed the slaves and won the war, the KKK quickly became an anti-Republican paramilitary force. White Republicans were among their first victims.

With the end of Republican hegemony at the end of Reconstruction came the return of the Democratic party and the institution of Jim Crow, with the KKK continuing to serve as irregular justice.

[Winehole23]

but it wasn't like it was a bunch of Democratic pols who founded it: it was a bunch of red-assed Confederate veterans and Nathan Bedford Forrest.

[Winehole23]

it's a well known historical fact that Woodrow Wilson was a white supremacist and arranged a viewing of "Birth of a Nation" in the White House.

[Winehole23]

also that Robert Byrd joined the KKK as a teenager. he says it was because he was jejune and a social climber: it's just what you did if you wanted to get ahead in West Virginia in the 1930s, according to Mr. Byrd.

[Winehole23]

I bet a solid 1/2 of Americans can tell you that Strom Thurmond was a Dixiecrat and what it means to be a Dixiecrat; we're not talking about hermetic secrets here, but ordinary US history.

It cracks me up that y'all think we're hearing it for the very first time from Dinesh D'Souza.

[Winehole23]

face it: white supremacy is not some hoary old 19th century relic, but has been mainstream and socially acceptable within my lifetime -- I am about 50 years old.

[Spurminator]

They rely on historical scorekeeping like sports fans talking about a Championship from 80 years ago because it's the path of least intellectual resistance. D'Souza is smart to make money off of them.

[SnakeBoy]

put it in a nutshell, SnakeBoy. what hits home for you?

Well it's hard to just narrow it down to one thing. I'd have to say the obvious historical accuracy and superb acting are the first things that jump out from the preview. You just don't see that type of combination from Hollywood anymore. I was also impressed that D'Souza correctly recognizes DJT is as transformative a POTUS as Lincoln, although I was a little disappointed he did not also note the similarities of DJT and Jesus. So while it does have some faults I think that getting out the truth like this will help Trump in his quest to get 90% of the black vote in 2020.

[Winehole23]

history as a scoreboard. hilarious.

[pgardn]

Well it's hard to just narrow it down to one thing. I'd have to say the obvious historical accuracy and superb acting are the first things that jump out from the preview. You just don't see that type of combination from Hollywood anymore. I was also impressed that D'Souza correctly recognizes DJT is as transformative a POTUS as Lincoln, although I was a little disappointed he did not also note the similarities of DJT and Jesus. So while it does have some faults I think that getting out the truth like this will help Trump in his quest to get 90% of the black vote in 2020.

You forgot the tbh in your satire above

[Winehole23]

Well it's hard to just narrow it down to one thing. I'd have to say the obvious historical accuracy and superb acting are the first things that jump out from the preview. You just don't see that type of combination from Hollywood anymore. I was also impressed that D'Souza correctly recognizes DJT is as transformative a POTUS as Lincoln, although I was a little disappointed he did not also note the similarities of DJT and Jesus. So while it does have some faults I think that getting out the truth like this will help Trump in his quest to get 90% of the black vote in 2020.:rollin

[Chucho]

I bet a solid 1/2 of Americans can tell you that Strom Thurmond was a Dixiecrat and what it means to be a Dixiecrat; we're not talking about hermetic secrets here, but ordinary US history.

It cracks me up that y'all think we're hearing it for the very first time from Dinesh D'Souza.

The Dems ran a Dixiecrat in Hillary. Anti-gay marriage, former 1st Lady of Arkansas with heavy affection for a major KKK player. She said herself people cant change.

[vy65]

Well it's hard to just narrow it down to one thing. I'd have to say the obvious historical accuracy and superb acting are the first things that jump out from the preview. You just don't see that type of combination from Hollywood anymore. I was also impressed that D'Souza correctly recognizes DJT is as transformative a POTUS as Lincoln, although I was a little disappointed he did not also note the similarities of DJT and Jesus. So while it does have some faults I think that getting out the truth like this will help Trump in his quest to get 90% of the black vote in 2020.

This country is fucked

[Winehole23]

The Dems ran a Dixiecrat in Hillary. Anti-gay marriage, former 1st Lady of Arkansas with heavy affection for a major KKK player. She said herself people cant change.HRC is the deadest of all political dead ducks, short of being actually dead.

what's your point?

[Monostradamus]

Moore has no problem with lying. D'Souza deals in facts
:lmao

[Spurtacular]

:lmao

Slob-bot :lol

[Monostradamus]

:lmao semen shielding a movie you haven’t seen and won’t ever see :lmao

[Chucho]

HRC is the deadest of all political dead ducks, short of being actually dead.

what's your point?

That's why they lost. You brought up Dixiecrats, people say the Republicans and Demos switched places and they are still running the Dixiecrat candidates they claim became the Republican party. That's all.

[Pavlov]

:lmao semen shielding a movie you haven’t seen and won’t ever see :lmaoHe's the kind of guy who would see it on a Friday night just to spite us.

OTOH it would validate the audience review he's already posted on multiple sites.

[koriwhat]

:lmao semen shielding a movie you haven’t seen and won’t ever see :lmao

better than eating yourself to death as you completely bought into the fast food industry and threw your health out the window. soon enough you won't even be able to troll us due to cardiac arrest. "death of a lard ass" by mono d'iabetes

[Pavlov]

Where is this fat talk coming from?

[koriwhat]

Where is this fat talk coming from?

don't worry pav. stay in your own lane.

[Pavlov]

don't worry pav. stay in your own lane.No. You bring this up every. You depend on this insult and we have to see it, so give us the backstory on it.

[Winehole23]

That's why they lost. You brought up Dixiecrats, people say the Republicans and Demos switched places and they are still running the Dixiecrat candidates they claim became the Republican party. That's all.The death of racism is greatly exaggerated in all quarters.

[spurraider21]

That's why they lost. You brought up Dixiecrats, people say the Republicans and Demos switched places and they are still running the Dixiecrat candidates they claim became the Republican party. That's all.
true or false: the south used to be a democrat stronghold

true or false: the south in recent years has become a republican stronghold

did the people of the south have a change of heart, or do you think those labels perhaps dont carry identical meanings now as they did 60 years ago (or 160 years ago, for people who still talk about muh party of lincoln)

[koriwhat]

No. You bring this up every. You depend on this insult and we have to see it, so give us the backstory on it.

put me on ignore. you don't have to see shit homie.

[Pavlov]

put me on ignore. you don't have to see shit homie.Why are you afraid to talk about your go-to insult?

[koriwhat]

Why are you afraid to talk about your go-to insult?

why do you care so much? pavTHETIC i am really starting to personally dislike you. you're that kid no one wants to be a friend of.

you have a problem with anything i type here then put me on your ignore list and live the best life you can. now go fuck yourself!

[Pavlov]

why do you care so much? pavTHETIC i am really starting to personally dislike you. you're that kid no one wants to be a friend of.

you have a problem with anything i type here then put me on your ignore list and live the best life you can. now go fuck yourself!I don't have a problem with it.

I'm asking you about it.

You bring it up all the time and you shut down when I asked you a simple question. What is the matter with you guys getting all shy?

[koriwhat]

I don't have a problem with it.

I'm asking you about it.

You bring it up all the time and you shut down when I asked you a simple question. What is the matter with you guys getting all shy?

don't worry about it and stop making threads all about you and your dumb questions. move along.

[Pavlov]

don't worry about it and stop making threads all about you and your dumb questions. move along.DON'T EVER ASK ME ABOUT THINGS I BRING UP ALL THE TIME!

That's just stupid, dude.

[Spurtacular]

DON'T EVER ASK ME ABOUT THINGS I BRING UP ALL THE TIME!

That's just stupid, dude.

Tantrum

[koriwhat]

DON'T EVER ASK ME ABOUT THINGS I BRING UP ALL THE TIME!

That's just stupid, dude.

it's easy pav... it doesn't concern you so stay the fuck out of it. god damn you're so fucking annoying. go play drama queen somewhere else you female.

[Winehole23]

so Spurtacular, what's your take on party realignment post 1965?

[koriwhat]

Tantrum

always... ugh

[Pavlov]

Tantrum:lol crutch word

Use lashing out and triggered next.

You're just as afraid to talk about things you bring up.

[Winehole23]

you demanded an answer from me; I gave you one.

what's your answer to this, Spurtacular?


true or false: the south used to be a democrat stronghold

true or false: the south in recent years has become a republican stronghold

did the people of the south have a change of heart, or do you think those labels perhaps dont carry identical meanings now as they did 60 years ago (or 160 years ago, for people who still talk about muh party of lincoln)

[vy65]

you demanded an answer from me; I gave you one.

what's your answer to this, Spurtacular?

They don’t answer because they can’t. I doubt they know what a copperhead is/was

[Spurtacular]

:lol crutch word

Use lashing out and triggered next.

You're just as afraid to talk about things you bring up.

Nope. Try composing yourself and not throwing tantrums. You won't have to lash out if you do that.

[Pavlov]

tantrums lash out :lmao

[Winehole23]

vy65: I think Spurtacular is capable of saying what he thinks but chooses not to.

Mixture of cowardice and guile behind that I would say. It seldom goes well for him he when he actually discloses topical opinions.

Playing the dozens is more his thing.

[Spurtacular]

They don’t answer because they can’t. I doubt they know what a copperhead is/was

Actually, I didn't answer because he didn't quote to alert it. I can see why; his answer was pretty damn weak.

[Spurtacular]

:lmao

That's not composing yourself. That's just trying to put a happy face on your spazz.

[Winehole23]

how is it weak?

are you saying there wasn't a party realignment after 1965?

[Chucho]

true or false: the south used to be a democrat stronghold

true or false: the south in recent years has become a republican stronghold

did the people of the south have a change of heart, or do you think those labels perhaps dont carry identical meanings now as they did 60 years ago (or 160 years ago, for people who still talk about muh party of lincoln)

The Dems ran the antithesis of their platform and lost. I was mocking the hypocrisy of the "holier than thou" platitudes shown by the Democrat supporters because they voted for a Republican disguised as a Democrat while mocking the whole "we switched rhetoric so we inherit what the Republican party accomplished before we switched sides". Admittedly, more of a troll post because the word "Dixiecrat" was mentioned. I took my shot and it resonated. I still stand by Hillary being a racist and an affectionate fan of a KKK Grand Wizard and I laugh at the people who voted for her because she was a fraud the way people laugh at (and they should) people like me who thought Trump would be the "every man" candidate that politics needs. Instead of being bought by lobbyists, he was probably bought by a foreign enemy.

[Spurtacular]

vy65 (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=11399): I think Spurtacular is capable of saying what he thinks but chooses not to.

Mixture of cowardice and guile behind that I would say. It seldom goes well for him he when he actually discloses topical opinions.

Playing the dozens is more his thing.

:lol at this given what I just said in 146.

[Pavlov]

That's not composing yourself. That's just trying to put a happy face on your spazz.Is "spazz" a new crutch word for you?

lol break out det thesaurus

[Spurtacular]

how is it weak?

are you saying there wasn't a party realignment after 1965?

There was (at some point) b/c your party was offering free shit. Doesn't mean the leadership magically didn't become not racist.

[vy65]

Actually, I didn't answer because he didn't quote to alert it. I can see why; his answer was pretty damn weak.


how is it weak?

are you saying there wasn't a party realignment after 1965?

Ditto. How was it weak?

[Pavlov]

There was (at some point) b/c your party was offering free shit. Doesn't mean the leadership magically didn't become not racist.

are you saying there wasn't a party realignment after 1965?
He will never answer this question.

Ever.

[Winehole23]

"it was weak" is not a topical take, it's your take on someone else's take.

what's your take on party realignment post 1965?

[Spurtacular]

Is "spazz" a new crutch word for you?

lol break out det thesaurus

You spend countless posts in every thread finding the smallest things you can battle over and often in an effort to not actually regard the subject matter. This is pretty well case in point.

[Winehole23]

You spend countless posts in every thread finding the smallest things you can battle over take a look in the mirror, dude

[Spurtacular]

"it was weak" is not a topical take, it's your take on someone else's take.

what's your take on party realignment post 1965?

I just gave you my take, bruh. What's your point?

[Spurtacular]

take a look in the mirror, dude

I'm fine with taking the look at chump. I didn't say nobody else ever does this. It's not a secret that this is chump's prime strategy.

[Winehole23]

that you don't have one, or more precisely, that you refuse to say what it is.

[Pavlov]

I just gave you my take, bruh. What's your point?
are you saying there wasn't a party realignment after 1965?You wil never answer this question.

Ever.

Let your squirming begin!

[Winehole23]

ah, I think I'll skip the pillow talk.

I've seen this movie before, it never ends well.

[Monostradamus]

always... ugh
lol giving up so easily.

fat jokes incoming!

[koriwhat]

lol giving up so easily.

fat jokes incoming!

if they're true are they still just jokes? dispute them.

[Pavlov]

if they're true are they still just jokes? dispute them.How do you know it's true?

[Winehole23]

There was (at some point) b/c [the Democrats were] offering free shit. Doesn't mean the leadership magically didn't become not racist.Freedom plus groceries and work in the New Deal; that's when black folks started to vote for Democrats.

The other free shit you're referring to (perhaps without realizing it, and more crucially for realignment) was civil rights for non-white people and you'd be wrong to blame that on the Dems, it couldn't have gotten across the finish line without Republicans.

I agree that being in the political parties that conferred civil rights on nonwhites didn't make anyone magically not racist. No one in this thread has suggested it did.

[Spurtacular]

Freedom plus groceries and work in the New Deal; that's when black folks started to vote for Democrats.

The other free shit you're referring to (perhaps without realizing it, and more crucially for realignment) was civil rights for non-white people and you'd be wrong to blame that on the Dems, it couldn't have gotten across the finish line without Republicans.

I agree that being in the political parties that conferred civil rights on nonwhites didn't make anyone magically not racist. No one in this thread has suggested it did.

You probably wish you were more educated. A higher percentage of house Republicans voted for the Civil Rights Act than did Democrats. In the Senate, Democrat and former KKK member and hero of Hillary Clinton, Robert Byrd fillibustered the act for 14 hours and 13 minutes. You are trying to give some sanitized "party realignment" when the truth is that racist Democrats didn't all just jump ship.

[Spurtacular]

You wil never answer this question.

Ever.

Let your squirming begin!

Bruh, I gave my input. I've seen this debate a million times over. It bores me.

:lol "Squirming"
:lol Cheap come-ons
:lol Par
:lol Lashing out, too

[Pavlov]

Bruh, I gave my input. I've seen this debate a million times over. It bores me.

:lol "Squirming"
:lol Cheap come-ons
:lol Par
:lol Lashing out, tooYep, squirming in overdrive since I called it.


are you saying there wasn't a party realignment after 1965?You wil never answer this question.

Ever.

[Spurtacular]

Yep, squirming in overdrive since I called it.

You wil never answer this question.

Ever.

:lmao Today's chump
:lmao Goes on a crusade against buzz words
:lmao Can't go 10 minutes without using buzz word cheap come-ons

[Pavlov]

cheap come-ons
:lol another one

You still haven't answered the question.

are you saying there wasn't a party realignment after 1965?
And you never will.

As predicted.

[Spurtacular]

:lol another one

You still haven't answered the question.

And you never will.

As predicted.

That question has been addressed in convo multiple times. If you weren't busy grudge posting, you might've noticed.

[Winehole23]

You are trying to give some sanitized "party realignment" when the truth is that racist Democrats didn't all just jump ship.I don't think so. There's nothing sanitized about saying that party realignment started happening after the Voting Rights Act and the Civil Rights Act of 1965. That is when it started.

No one said the shift was instant. No one said the shift made one party magically immune to racism.

Over time, southern Democrats became Republicans and solid Democratic states became solidly Republican.

In Texas this really didn't start happening until the 1980s, but shrewd political operators saw the writing on the wall well beforehand.

[Pavlov]

That question has been addressed in convo multiple times.Nope, you simply never answered the question.

And you never will.


are you saying there wasn't a party realignment after 1965?


There it is -- all you have to do is say yes or no.

But you won't.

It's killing you.

So you'll have to squirm more.

lol

[Spurtacular]

I don't think so. There's nothing sanitized about saying that party realignment started happening after the Voting Rights Act and the Civil Rights Act of 1965. That is when it started.

No one said the shift was instant. No one said the shift made one party magically immune to racism.

Over time, southern Democrats became Republicans and solid Democratic states became solidly Republican.

In Texas this really didn't start happening until the 1980s, but shrewd political operators saw the writing on the wall well beforehand.

You said party realignment of 1965. I'd say that's rather definitive and "instant" in politics. Of course I know about shifts over decades, but you're the one who insisted, winer.

[Pavlov]

You said party realignment of 1965. I'd say that's rather definitive and "instant" in politics. Of course I know about shifts over decades, but you're the one who insisted, winer.Sorry

are you saying there wasn't a party realignment after 1965?
Now you have to lie after seeing the question multiple times.

lol

[Winehole23]

I said after 1965. At least be honest.

[Spurtacular]

Nope, you simply never answered the question.

And you never will.




There it is -- all you have to do is say yes or no.

But you won't.

It's killing you.

So you'll have to squirm more.

lol

:lmao at the tantrum
:lmao I'd list the dialogue that shows how blatantly wrong you were if you were worth it
:lmao It wouldn't stop you from doing it ten times the next day and the day after
:lmao Today's shameless chump

[Pavlov]

tantrumlol buzzword.

Just answer.

are you saying there wasn't a party realignment after 1965?
It's an easy one.

Even you can get it.

[Spurtacular]

I said after 1965. At least be honest.

There's been party realignment going back decades before that. But if we're talking post 1965, yea your racist Democrats re-strategized to rope-a-dope black people and keep them tethered and dependent.

[Spurtacular]

lol buzzword.

Just answer.

It's an easy one.

Even you can get it.

You could just stop throwing a tantrum if you don't like being called out on it. But then you wouldn't be you if you did that. :lmao

[Pavlov]

There's been party realignment going back decades before that. But if we're talking post 1965, yea your racist Democrats re-strategized to rope-a-dope black people and keep them tethered and dependent.:rollin

You're the least honest person on this board.

[Pavlov]

tantrum:lol crutch

[Winehole23]

:rollin

You're the least honest person on this board.eh, at least he gave his own take this time

[Pavlov]

eh, at least he gave his own take this time:lol After he flat out lied about what you asked.

Dude thought he could get away with it.

lol

[Spurtacular]

:lol After he flat out lied about what you asked.

Dude thought he could get away with it.

lol

:lmao "Flat out lied." If you look back at the text, it's obvious I missed the word "post" and responded accordingly.
:lmao Chump lashing out all over the place

Honestly, this wasn't even your battle. You were just piggybacking and being a pest. It's sad that you need that much attention.

[Pavlov]

:lmao "Flat out lied." If you look back at the text, it's obvious I missed the word "post" and responded accordingly.You missed it every time I reposted it.

You admit to being pretty slow there.

lol


lashing out:lmao again


HonestlyYou can never say that on this board.

[Spurtacular]

You missed it every time I reposted it.

You admit to being pretty slow there.

lol

:lmao again

You can never say that on this board.

You could not be more in drama queen mode. Damn son, I didn't make a big thing of it when he accused me of not answering even though winer didn't tag me to be alert to it. And then I did answer even though I was upfront that I could hardly give a fuck.


how is it weak?

are you saying there wasn't a party realignment after 1965?


There was (at some point) b/c your party was offering free shit. Doesn't mean the leadership magically didn't become not racist.

And yea, I forgot that the word post was in there. Mistakes happen but you got to be a raging buttfuck and somehow make this an honestly issue. Your grudge posting is just you being consistent with being a sociopath.


so Spurtacular, what's your take on party realignment post 1965?

[Pavlov]

You could not be more in drama queen mode. Damn son, I didn't make a big thing of it when he accused me of not answering even though winer didn't tag me to be alert to it.Now you are making a big thing out of it. :lol

And then I did answer even though I was upfront that I could hardly give a fuck.You lied about what he said then gave the most dishonest answer you took hours to formulate.


And yea, I forgot that the word post was in there. Mistakes happen but you got to be a raging buttfuck and somehow make this an honestly issue.Sorry, you can't get away with that after seeing that question that many times.


Your grudge posting is just you being consistent with being a sociopath.Stealing a shtick and using one of your buzzwords in a single sentence.

Bravo. :lol

[ElNono]

Moore has no problem with lying. D'Souza deals in facts

:lmao:lmao:lmao

[ElNono]

Well it's hard to just narrow it down to one thing. I'd have to say the obvious historical accuracy and superb acting are the first things that jump out from the preview. You just don't see that type of combination from Hollywood anymore. I was also impressed that D'Souza correctly recognizes DJT is as transformative a POTUS as Lincoln, although I was a little disappointed he did not also note the similarities of DJT and Jesus. So while it does have some faults I think that getting out the truth like this will help Trump in his quest to get 90% of the black vote in 2020.

:lol

[ElNono]

Absolutely.

Contextually there's more than enough to figure that out.

After the Lincoln freed the slaves and won the war, the KKK quickly became an anti-Republican paramilitary force. White Republicans were among their first victims.

With the end of Republican hegemony at the end of Reconstruction came the return of the Democratic party and the institution of Jim Crow, with the KKK continuing to serve as irregular justice.

but it wasn't like it was a bunch of Democratic pols who founded it: it was a bunch of red-assed Confederate veterans and Nathan Bedford Forrest.

it's a well known historical fact that Woodrow Wilson was a white supremacist and arranged a viewing of "Birth of a Nation" in the White House.

also that Robert Byrd joined the KKK as a teenager. he says it was because he was jejune and a social climber: it's just what you did if you wanted to get ahead in West Virginia in the 1930s, according to Mr. Byrd.

I bet a solid 1/2 of Americans can tell you that Strom Thurmond was a Dixiecrat and what it means to be a Dixiecrat; we're not talking about hermetic secrets here, but ordinary US history.

It cracks me up that y'all think we're hearing it for the very first time from Dinesh D'Souza.

face it: white supremacy is not some hoary old 19th century relic, but has been mainstream and socially acceptable within my lifetime -- I am about 50 years old.

Thanks for the history lesson, but anybody that looks at the South these days, and it's not eloquently disingenuous, like D'Souza is, can tell that what used to be the Southern Democrats are the Southern Republicans today.

Heck, Lincoln (much like his spiritual successor Saint Reagan, also shot at) would be considered today a deep-state, RINO, weak leader that bent over to the blacks! Sad!

[ElNono]

vy65: I think Spurtacular is capable of saying what he thinks but chooses not to.

Mixture of cowardice and guile behind that I would say. It seldom goes well for him he when he actually discloses topical opinions.

Playing the dozens is more his thing.

To be fair, Spurtacular is a self-admitted racist (although his claim is that racism doesn't exist, which is, factually, provably false). And I don't mention this as a personal judgement, everybody is who they chose to be, for the most part.

I just feel that the main reason you're unlikely to get a response is that he doesn't really admits/identifies a problem, or the answer doesn't advance his confirmation bias, so it logically follows that there's nothing to respond to.

[Spurtacular]

I don't waste my time (watching D'Souza films). Same with Moore films... but there's certainly an audience for confirmation bias flicks...


Moore has no problem with lying. D'Souza deals in facts; that's why chump had to rely on saying his conclusions were wild.


:lmao:lmao:lmao

So, you were either lying or you're laughing in ignorance. Either way, enjoy your L.

:rollin

[Spurtacular]

To be fair, Spurtacular is a self-admitted racist (although his claim is that racism doesn't exist, which is, factually, provably false).

:lol You're just full-on talking out of your ass, "to be fair".

[Spurtacular]

I just feel that the main reason you're unlikely to get a response is that he doesn't really admits/identifies a problem, or the answer doesn't advance his confirmation bias, so it logically follows that there's nothing to respond to.

Actually, I've said that I've seen this particular debate done a million times over and that I find it trite. Does it excite you?

[Pavlov]

Actually, I've said that I've seen this particular debate done a million times over and that I find it trite. Does it excite you?He just described what you have done a million times to avoid anything that challenges your bias.

[ElNono]

Can we all agree racism is bad tbh?


No. B/C what is called racism is often BS. I'm still waiting to hear how the Germans are racists.

Verbatim, with links, can't claim I made it up.

I stand by what I posted, readers can draw their own conclusions.

[ElNono]

Feel free to clarify, if I got it wrong

[Spurtacular]

Verbatim, with links, can't claim I made it up.

I stand by what I posted, readers can draw their own conclusions.

Yes, and I was speaking on a subject in which racism was being branded as a term without any actual proof. That's a long leap to say that I said racism doesn't exist. It seems to me that you want to fulfill your own "confirmation bias" to put it generously.

:lol You can stand by your bull shit all you want; it doesn't mean you don't come off smelling like bull shit.

[Spurtacular]

He just described what you have done a million times to avoid anything that challenges your bias.

You're gonna have to take a seat in the peanut gallery. The No's is more interesting than you.

[Pavlov]

You're gonna have to take a seat in the peanut gallery. The No's is more interesting than you.Sure, but he just said the same thing I do.

lol

[ElNono]

Yes, and I was speaking on a subject in which racism was being branded as a term without any actual proof. That's a long leap to say that I said racism doesn't exist. It seems to me that you want to fulfill your own "confirmation bias" to put it generously.

:lol You can stand by your bull shit all you want; it doesn't mean you don't come off smelling like bull shit.

Racism is a universal term, no matter the subject. The question was clear and the answer was too. Those who believe racism exists, know it's a form of discrimination, and it's bad. Logically, it follows that either you don't believe racism exists, or you don't think it's bad (which, in practice, is the same thing). But if you had a change of heart, that's fine too. As I stated, I make no personal judgements. You wouldn't be the only self-admitted racist (if you still are) here, tbh...

On the topic of what I wrote, I think it's pretty clear and in line with what other posters already pointed out. If somebody else deems it bullshit, they can certainly let it be known.

I have nothing personal against D'Souza or Moore, their stuff just doesn't pass a cursory history test.

[Pavlov]

That's a long leap to say that I said racism doesn't existDoes white on minority racism exist?

Yes or no.

[Spurtacular]

Sure, but he just said the same thing I do.

lol

He troling and all (a bit); but you been PMS'ing all day. He has more dignity than that.

[Pavlov]

He troling and all; but you been PMS'ing all day. He has more dignity than that.I simply ask you a question you will do anything in your power to not answer because it will apparently destroy you and your entire world for the reasons El Nono explained so eloquently and politely.

It's stunningly easy to find such a question with you. You're really, really sensitive and get super defensive about it.

[Spurtacular]

Racism is a universal term, no matter the subject. The question was clear and the answer was too. Those who believe racism exists, know it's a form of discrimination, and it's bad. Logically, it follows that either you don't believe racism exists, or you don't think it's bad (which, in practice, is the same thing). But if you had a change of heart, that's fine too. As I stated, I make no personal judgements. You wouldn't be the only self-admitted racist (if you still are) here, tbh...


Sure, if it had been presented that Ozil had been discriminated based on his race, then that would be racism. That was not the case. And if you look at that thread, you'll see that multiple times I asked for people to present such examples of racism. Nobody ever did. :lol that you're talking "logically" when you're clearly taking shortcuts at a minimum or being a hack at a 'maximum'. You are making "personal" judgments and based on ignorant or hacky shit too.

[Spurtacular]

:cry

I wasn't just making a joke when I said to have your seat in the peanut gallery. You're not that interesting. The No's is more interesting even when he's notched his troll mode up a couple notches. Deal with it.

[Pavlov]

I wasn't just making a joke when I said to have your seat in the peanut gallery. You're not that interesting. The No's is more interesting even when he's notched his troll mode up a couple notches. Deal with it.Like I said, you'll make any excuse to avoid simple questions that will end your world.

[Spurtacular]

On the topic of what I wrote, I think it's pretty clear and in line with what other posters already pointed out. If somebody else deems it bullshit, they can certainly let it be known.

I have nothing personal against D'Souza or Moore, their stuff just doesn't pass a cursory history test.

Your L on this has been explained. I know this is the part where you comeback with the "win the internet" stuff. But if you don't like it, then be consistent in your posting. Don't say you haven't watched shit and then laugh like you have an opinion on something you admitted to not watching. It's hacky. But then again, you're having a pretty hacky day, I guess.

[Spurtacular]

Like I said, you'll make any excuse to avoid simple questions that will end your world.

I'm not making excuses. I'm telling you straight-up that I'm currently zoning you out. :lmao

[Pavlov]

I'm not making excuses. I'm telling you straight-up that I'm currently zoning you out. :lmaoYou're doing such a great job of it immediately responding to my posts.

You're really sensitive.

:lmao

[Spurtacular]

You're doing such a great job of it immediately responding to my posts.

You're really sensitive.

:lmao

'Substantively' zoning you out. I have no problem taking a moment to bitch slap you. :lmao

[Pavlov]

'Substantively' zoning you out. I have no problem taking a moment to bitch slap you. :lmaoAs long as you can avoid answering simple questions that would destroy your world, you'll do and say anything -- "substantively."

lol

[Spurtacular]

As long as you can avoid answering simple questions that would destroy your world, you'll do and say anything -- "substantively."

lol

You presume you're that important; you're not.

[ElNono]

Your L on this has been explained. I know this is the part where you comeback with the "win the internet" stuff. But if you don't like it, then be consistent in your posting. Don't say you haven't watched shit and then laugh like you have an opinion on something you admitted to not watching. It's hacky. But then again, you're having a pretty hacky day, I guess.

What are you babbling about? Did you just found out who Dinesh D'Souza or Michael Moore are? How many Michael Moore films you watched to know he's a hack? BTW, a synopsis (as opposed to an opinion piece) works just as well.

Just don't insult people's intelligence, like the D'Souza attempts to do. The current Democratic party has nothing to do with the Southern Democrats from the Lincoln era, no matter if D'Souza or Moore tell you otherwise. It really takes an abject ignorant or idiot, and really, I don't care if the photography on the movie is spectacular, that's not what the movie and the absolutely retarded message is about. It's not being presented as fiction either, as far as I know.

There really isn't much more to argue about this, tbh... and my day is fine.

[Pavlov]

You presume you're that important; you're not.You're the one responding without fail.

[Spurtacular]

What are you babbling about? Did you just found out who Dinesh D'Souza or Michael Moore are? How many Michael Moore films you watched to know he's a hack? BTW, a synopsis (as opposed to an opinion piece) works just as well.

Just don't insult people's intelligence, like the D'Souza attempts to do. The current Democratic party has nothing to do with the Southern Democrats from the Lincoln era, no matter if D'Souza or Moore tell you otherwise. It really takes an abject ignorant or idiot, and really, I don't care if the photography on the movie is spectacular, that's not what the movie and the absolutely retarded message is about. It's not being presented as fiction either, as far as I know.

There really isn't much more to argue about this, tbh... and my day is fine.

Well given that I said all along that I don't think that it's not a fun subject matter for a debate, I cannot say I'm all that inclined to argue.

But to give a brief rebuttal all the same, it was white Republicans who went to war to free the blacks. Sure, many of them were "racist" by today's standards. My point all along would've been that it's a rich amalgam of elements and that neither party has the high ground on this or some perfectly wonderful story about avoiding racism.

[Spurtacular]

You're the one responding without fail.

Does that make you important?

[Pavlov]

Does that make you important?You're conferring it on me by default.

[Spurtacular]

You're conferring it on me by default.

So responses to you makes you important :tu

You've effectively explained why you beg for so much attention :tu

[Pavlov]

So responses to you makes you importantNope, your responding to me incessantly simply proves I'm important to you.

[Spurtacular]

Nope, your responding to me incessantly simply proves I'm important to you.

You're "incessantly" responding to me. I must be quite important to you by your own definition.

[Pavlov]

You're "incessantly" responding to me. I must be quite important to you by your own definition.I never claimed I was trying to tune you out.

You did.

But you couldn't help it.

Now respond to this forcefully with emojis.

[RandomGuy]

Do you believe Hillary is Satan incarnate, SnakeBoy?

Good luck getting an answer.

[SnakeBoy]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qh5K3p1pnY

[Pavlov]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qh5K3p1pnYANTIFA are dumbasses, but is there another video where there is an actual attack?

And who is Candace Owens?

[Chris]

ANTIFA are dumbasses, but is there another video where there is an actual attack?

And who is Candace Owens?

Poor Pavlov has to be spoon-fed EVERYTHING. Can't keep up with current events or relevant people.

[Pavlov]

Poor Pavlov has to be spoon-fed EVERYTHING. Can't keep up with current events or relevant people.OK, no one can tell me who she is and she didn't get attacked.

Pretty important stuff.

[Spurminator]

1026482263947726848

[Chris]

1026608426057486337

[Monostradamus]

1026608426057486337
:lmao that’s because (1) it wasn’t a “documentary” by Michael Moore it was a taped stage performance that got a limited theatrical release, and (2) it was only released in 2 theaters, you dumbshit.

$25,000 per theater for Moore vs $2,000 for D’Felon :lmao

[Monostradamus]

:lmao this thread will be bumped when Fahrenheit 11/9 kicks the shit out of D’Felon’s ass parade.

[koriwhat]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qh5K3p1pnY

they're such pathetic sissy's just like i describe some here. lump them altogether and i'm still not wrong about either. fucking pussy's the whole lot of them.

[Spurminator]

Dinesh's movie is KILLIN IT in week 2!

https://i.imgur.com/b0Lun1M.png

[SnakeBoy]

:lmao this thread will be bumped when Fahrenheit 11/9 kicks the shit out of D’Felon’s ass parade.

So you are planning on bragging that there are more dumbass liberals than dumbass conservatives. Sounds like a great plan.

[Trey Gowdy]

So you are planning on bragging that there are more dumbass liberals than dumbass conservatives. Sounds like a great plan.
Your buddy Mike Cernovich is the one who linked D’Felon’s shitty movie to Michael Moore’s.

[Spurminator]

Just broke $5 million earned! WOW!!

https://i.imgur.com/5j2ulqi.png?1

[Spurminator]

If y'all haven't seen this yet, looks like you'd better hurry.

[Pavlov]

Just broke $5 million earned! WOW!!

https://i.imgur.com/5j2ulqi.png?1lol curbstomped by RBG.

[koriwhat]

So responses to you makes you important :tu

You've effectively explained why you beg for so much attention :tu

been saying it from the beginning...

[Spurminator]

https://i.imgur.com/nbnqnYn.png

:lmao

[RandomGuy]

https://i.imgur.com/nbnqnYn.png

:lmao

wazzat?


(edit)

NM

inferred from reading back what the columns mean. The $5M number is the box office gross.

[Pavlov]

wazzat?


(edit)

NM

inferred from reading back what the columns mean. The $5M number is the box office gross.Yeah, list was sorted by weekend gross per theater. Looks like a money loser.

[Spurminator]

Weekend Box Office results sorted by sales per screen.

[RandomGuy]

The big thing is how fast the revenues fell. -68% week on week sales, each week, and dropping from playing 900+ theaters to 180 in most recent.

That is the sure sign of the free market telling you to fuck right off with your movie.

[monosylab1k]

The big thing is how fast the revenues fell. -68% week on week sales, each week, and dropping from playing 900+ theaters to 180 in most recent.

That is the sure sign of the free market telling you to fuck right off with your movie.

Yeah but it made more money than the Michael Moore project that played in 2 theaters for one weekend, therefore conservatives win!

[RandomGuy]

Weekend Box Office results sorted by sales per screen.

Don't forget this:

Cost of production: $6M
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_a_Nation:_Can_We_Save_America_a_Second_Ti me%3F


In his review of “Death of a Nation,”Variety’s chief film critic Owen Gleiberman says, “Dinesh D’Souza goes over the top — of hate, and of truth — in his latest documentary, a radical-right screed that equates liberalism with Nazism.” He adds, “Dinesh D’Souza is no longer preaching to the choir; he’s preaching to the mentally unsound.”
https://variety.com/2018/film/news/dinesh-dsouzas-pro-trump-doc-death-of-a-nation-box-office-1202895554/
:lol


With the revenue collapsing... they may have to PAY Netflix or Amazon to pick up their shitty movie. This thing will lose money.

[RandomGuy]

Yeah but it made more money than the Michael Moore project that played in 2 theaters for one weekend, therefore conservatives win!

smh

That is what passes for reasoning these days. a "gotcha" on "libtards" no matter how bad the point, or how untrue.

Trump Derangement Syndrome is quite real, but it doesn't afflict the people that TSA et al. think it does.

[Spurminator]

1026608426057486337


:lmao this thread will be bumped when Fahrenheit 11/9 kicks the shit out of D’Felon’s ass parade.

https://i.imgur.com/IX4ORSD.png
https://i.imgur.com/rskqxSf.png
https://i.imgur.com/E2b5HTK.png

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DQkZHG3VAAAQowU.jpg
https://fitzinfo.files.wordpress.com/2017/05/cernovich.jpg