NPR: YouTube, Apple and Facebook Ban Alex Jones' Infowars

[DarrinS]

Tell you what, why don't you ask the parents of the child who was murdered what emotion they feel when people threaten their lives.

Jones does not care about the truth, and again, all right have limits. In this case though, this is a matter of a private company deciding what to do with its product.

Whose rights are more important to you? The private company, or the private citizen.

Pick.


That guy was allowed to say outrageous shit for years. The Sandy Hook shit is more offensive than anything he could say about trannies, IMO. But, we live in strange times.

[Chris]

What are the limits on free speech and how did Alex Jones violate those limits? Can someone answer since RandomGuy is too chickenshit to explain his own words?

[Chris]

Holy shit. You've been posting here all this time and you are completely ignorant of the basic news story.

lol Chris

What are the limits on free speech and how did Alex Jones violate those limits? Can you answer since RandomGuy is too chickenshit to explain his own words?

[Pavlov]

What are the limits on free speech and how did Alex Jones violate those limits? Can someone answer since RandomGuy is too chickenshit to explain his own words?You can't answer them

That's the most telling piece of information in this thread.

lol Chris

[Spurminator]

What are the limits on free speech and how did Alex Jones violate those limits?

Free Speech is limited on non-government-owned channels with terms and conditions that you must agree to prior to communicating on those channels.

Alex Jones violated this limit by saying things that are against their terms and conditions despite agreeing to them.

[Chris]

What are the limits on free speech and how did Alex Jones violate those limits? Can someone answer since RandomGuy is too chickenshit to explain his own words?

UPDATE: Pavlov is a chickenshit as well.

[RandomGuy]

Sorry if you can't explain yourself. *shrug

I already explained exactly what I meant. Whether you want to lie about it after that, is on you. (shrugs)

[monosylab1k]

What are the limits on free speech and how did Alex Jones violate those limits? Can you answer since RandomGuy is too chickenshit to explain his own words?

How were Alex Jones’ 1A rights violated?

[Pavlov]

What are the limits on free speech and how did Alex Jones violate those limits? Can someone answer since RandomGuy is too chickenshit to explain his own words?

UPDATE: Pavlov is a chickenshit as well.The limits on speech for those platforms are whatever the owners of those platforms want them to be. They are clearly listed in each platform's terms of service.

Alex Jones violated the hate speech, bullying and violence terms of service he agreed to.

Pretty simple stuff. I can see how you would struggle with it.

[monosylab1k]

Free Speech is limited on non-government-owned channels with terms and conditions that you must agree to prior to communicating on those channels.

Alex Jones violated this limit by saying things that are against their terms and conditions despite agreeing to them.

Oh hey everyone, watch as Chris leaves this thread until everyone forgets how badly he got shat on here.

[Blake]

What are the limits on free speech and how did Alex Jones violate those limits? Can someone answer since RandomGuy is too chickenshit to explain his own words?

UPDATE: Pavlov is a chickenshit as well.

Damn you're stupid.

Like cosmored ":cry they is censoring me" stupid.

[leemajors]

Infowars forum TOS snippet:


You will not post anything libelous, defamatory, harmful, threatening, harassing, abusive, invasive of another’s privacy, hateful, racially or ethnically objectionable, or otherwise illegal.

You will not make threats to other users or people not associated with the site.

If you violate these rules, your posts and/or user name will be deleted.

Remember: you are a guest here. It is not censorship if you violate the rules and your post is deleted. All civilizations have rules and if you violate them you can expect to be ostracized from the tribe.

[Chris]

I already explained exactly what I meant. Whether you want to lie about it after that, is on you. (shrugs)

So the limits on free speech are corporations and their terms of service. See how easy that was? No reason to shuck and jive.

[RandomGuy]

What are the limits on free speech and how did Alex Jones violate those limits? Can someone answer since RandomGuy is too chickenshit to explain his own words?

UPDATE: Pavlov is a chickenshit as well.

Alex Jones has been successfully sued a number of times, most recently and notably, by the Chabani yogurt company, for libel.

Libel being a common limit on what is acceptable.

Jones has also been successfully sued by the owner of Ping Pong pizza for similar things, and is currently being sued by a group representing the parents of children murdered at Sandy Hook elementary.

A recent analysis I heard the other day on NPR noted that media companies and social media platforms will eventually be held accountable for speech on their platforms, as the plausible deniability that many have used to shield themselves is wearing a bit thin.

Slander, and encouraging violence are other forms of limits on free speech, within in the US.

I hope that clears it up for you.

[RandomGuy]

So the limits on free speech are corporations and their terms of service. See how easy that was? No reason to shuck and jive.

No. Limits on free speech generally are something set by governments.

Corporations, like bakers, can generally limit the use of their products, which in this case are transmission platforms for information.

[monosylab1k]

What are the limits on free speech and how did Alex Jones violate those limits? Can you answer since RandomGuy is too chickenshit to explain his own words?


Free Speech is limited on non-government-owned channels with terms and conditions that you must agree to prior to communicating on those channels.

Alex Jones violated this limit by saying things that are against their terms and conditions despite agreeing to them.


The limits on speech for those platforms are whatever the owners of those platforms want them to be. They are clearly listed in each platform's terms of service.

Alex Jones violated the hate speech, bullying and violence terms of service he agreed to.

Pretty simple stuff. I can see how you would struggle with it.
Chris ignoring this per usual :lmao

[RandomGuy]

Infowars forum TOS snippet:


You will not post anything libelous, defamatory, harmful, threatening, harassing, abusive, invasive of another’s privacy, hateful, racially or ethnically objectionable, or otherwise illegal.

You will not make threats to other users or people not associated with the site.

If you violate these rules, your posts and/or user name will be deleted.

Remember: you are a guest here. It is not censorship if you violate the rules and your post is deleted. All civilizations have rules and if you violate them you can expect to be ostracized from the tribe.



oooh snap.

Just in case anyone needed confirmation that Alex Jones is a hypocritical piece of shit.

[Chris]

No. Limits on free speech generally are something set by governments.

What are the other limits besides libel and slander?

[RandomGuy]

Chris ignoring this per usual :lmao

He really wants this to be about him or someone on the right being a victim somehow, so he is trying desperately to shoehorn victimhood into the equation.

[Pavlov]

What are the other limits besides libel and slander?Wow, Chris. Red-assing your ignorance really isn't a good strategy.

[RandomGuy]

What are the other limits besides libel and slander?

I have provided you with sufficient explanation. If you wish more:

http://bfy.tw/JJ8y

[Blake]

What are the other limits besides libel and slander?

Poor Chris begging to be spoonfed

[Chris]

No. Limits on free speech generally are something set by governments

What are the other limits besides libel and slander?

[RandomGuy]

What are the other limits besides libel and slander?

http://bfy.tw/JJ9A

[Chris]

I knew you were talking out of your ass.

[RandomGuy]

Poor Chris begging to be spoonfed

He is new to the whole critical thinking and asking questions thing, give the poor fella a break. He'll figure it out eventually.

[RandomGuy]

I knew you were talking out of your ass.

(nah)

[Pavlov]

I knew you were talking out of your ass.There are clearly other limits, Chris.

The "yelling fire in a crowded building" example is just one.

Just because you don't know them, don't take it out on people who do and are currently marveling at your admitted ignorance.

[RandomGuy]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_free_speech_exceptions

[RandomGuy]

http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2017/03/21/culture/politics/6-exceptions-to-freedom-of-speech.html

[Blake]

I knew you were talking out of your ass.

:lol

[RandomGuy]

"The U.S. Supreme Court has recognized very few exceptions to the First Amendment," says Robert Richards, founding director of the Pennsylvania Center for the First Amendment at Penn State, which was established in 1992 to promote awareness and understanding of the principles of free expression to the scholarly community, the media and the general public.

"The categories of speech that fall outside of its protection are obscenity, child pornography, defamation, incitement to violence and true threats of violence," he explains. "Even in those categories, there are tests that have to be met in order for the speech to be illegal. Beyond that, we are free to speak."

In the United States, several states have had laws against blasphemy even though such laws violate the U.S. Constitution.

Charlie Hebdo is considered by many to be an inflammatory and offensive publication, particularly for its graphic cartoons lampooning religious figures such as the Prophet Muhammad. Does that change how we should view the publication's free speech rights as seen through the lens of American laws and values?

"Many people are mistaken in their belief that offensive speech or hate speech is not protected," says Richards. "The Supreme Court has repeatedly affirmed the notion that unpopular speech enjoys full First Amendment protection. As the late Justice William Brennan put it, in a case involving flag burning, 'If there is a bedrock principle underlying the First Amendment, it is that government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea itself offensive or disagreeable.'"

Some would argue that much of the content in Charlie Hebdo is blasphemous. Yet the very notion of blasphemy -- defined as insulting God or any religious or holy person or thing -- varies greatly around the world. In some countries, blasphemy is not only illegal but is punishable by death. In the United States, several states have had laws against blasphemy even though such laws violate the U.S. Constitution. Pennsylvania enacted a blasphemy law in 1977, which was struck down by the U.S. District Court in 2007. The last conviction for blasphemy in the U.S. took place in Arkansas in 1928.

"In the United States, people are free to criticize religion as well as government," Richards says. "Some of that criticism can be quite caustic, yet we don't put people in jail, or worse, for engaging in that type of expression. Just a couple of years ago, the Supreme Court upheld the right of the Westboro Baptist Church to protest at military funerals with signs carrying extremely offensive messages. Without question, most Americans found those demonstrations to be repugnant. Nonetheless, we protect the right to protest."
https://news.psu.edu/story/341896/2015/01/27/research/probing-question-are-there-limits-freedom-speech


This information is not hard to find, with a minimum of effort.

https://www.google.com/search?q=what+are+the+limits+of+freedom+of+speech

[monosylab1k]

Free Speech is limited on non-government-owned channels with terms and conditions that you must agree to prior to communicating on those channels.

Alex Jones violated this limit by saying things that are against their terms and conditions despite agreeing to them.


The limits on speech for those platforms are whatever the owners of those platforms want them to be. They are clearly listed in each platform's terms of service.

Alex Jones violated the hate speech, bullying and violence terms of service he agreed to.

Pretty simple stuff. I can see how you would struggle with it.


https://media.giphy.com/media/xUA7b1iEuTwIj47n8c/200w.gif

[KenMcCoy]

Had never really listened/read any Alex Jones Infowars stuff but just downloaded the App. A few interesting talking points and a whole lot of crazy sh*t...about on par with regular media.

[Spurminator]

Had never really listened/read any Alex Jones Infowars stuff but just downloaded the App. A few interesting talking points and a whole lot of crazy sh*t...about on par with regular media.

Uh huh.

[hater]

Cnn has daily guests that claim Trump is a traitor and russian tbqh

Also NYT has some weird cartoons of trump and putin doing it

Sorry this is nothing more than chinese/iranian/israeli censorship tbqh

[RandomGuy]

Had never really listened/read any Alex Jones Infowars stuff but just downloaded the App. A few interesting talking points and a whole lot of crazy sh*t...about on par with regular media.

If you think he is "on par with regular media", you must have an odd idea as to what constitutes "regular".

[koriwhat]

love him or hate him, those of you applauding this underhanded tactic by the "Revenge of the Nerds" out in silicon valley are no different than the rest of the fascists past and present.

[koriwhat]

If you think he is "on par with regular media", you must have an odd idea as to what constitutes "regular".

please explain how regular MSM is... and by regular i mean FAKE FUCKING NEWS!

[Pavlov]

love him or hate him, those of you applauding this underhanded tactic by the "Revenge of the Nerds" out in silicon valley are no different than the rest of the fascists past and present.Nothing underhanded about it. The Terms of Service are clear. Even Infowars has them.

[koriwhat]

Nothing underhanded about it. The Terms of Service are clear. Even Infowars has them.

yall are just too funny... in that same breath you won't mention elsagate, isis vids, ect. cnn and the like helped push us into the iraqi war and more but lets not talk about them right? we know the game you're playing and i hope it blows up in your face.

[Pavlov]

yall are just too funny... in that same breath you won't mention elsagate, isis vids, ect. cnn and the like helped push us into the iraqi war and more but lets not talk about them right? we know the game you're playing and i hope it blows up in your face.You're too funny. You want to change ht subject every other post.

[hater]

Dear Dr Ron Paul withe da goods :tu

True American patriot

“You get accused of treasonous activity and treasonous speech because in an empire of lies the truth is treason,” Paul said. “Challenging the status quo is what they can’t stand and it unnerves them, so they have to silence people.”

[hater]

IN AN EMPIRE OF LIES, TRUTH IS TREASON

thank you Dr Paul.

Im gonna use that from now on :tu

[Spurtacular]

DarrinS (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=2042), do you think there should be government oversight of digital platforms?


Chris (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=1656), Spurtacular (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=49615): same question. do y'all favor state control of social media?

Way to tag me for bland generic questions. Reality is you want to justify fascism, tbh.

[koriwhat]

You're too funny. You want to change ht subject every other post.

you say this but it's not fact just because you say it is pavTHETIC. i'm on the same subject, TOS.

no red line... just remember that when the rest of us get fed up with the hypocrisy.

[Reck]

Way to tag me for bland generic questions. Reality is you want to justify fascism, tbh.

Says the faggot who cant stop mentioning and quoting people with garbage nonsense 247.

[koriwhat]

Says the faggot who cant stop mentioning and quoting people with garbage nonsense 247.

what color is your dress today mam?

[monosylab1k]

Free Speech is limited on non-government-owned channels with terms and conditions that you must agree to prior to communicating on those channels.

Alex Jones violated this limit by saying things that are against their terms and conditions despite agreeing to them.


The limits on speech for those platforms are whatever the owners of those platforms want them to be. They are clearly listed in each platform's terms of service.

Alex Jones violated the hate speech, bullying and violence terms of service he agreed to.

Pretty simple stuff. I can see how you would struggle with it.


https://media.giphy.com/media/xUA7b1iEuTwIj47n8c/200w.gif

[hater]

Dear Dr Ron Paul withe da goods :tu

True American patriot

“You get accused of treasonous activity and treasonous speech because in an empire of lies the truth is treason,” Paul said. “Challenging the status quo is what they can’t stand and it unnerves them, so they have to silence people.”

[monosylab1k]

Good gorilla. I like the way you hit the other gorilla.

[Spurtacular]

There are clearly other limits, Chris.

The "yelling fire in a crowded building" example is just one.

Just because you don't know them, don't take it out on people who do and are currently marveling at your admitted ignorance.

Weeds.

[Chris]

1026948608237551616

[Chris]

1026965318516654080

Coordinated deplatforming

[Chris]

1026962627749191680

[Blake]

Lol "top attorney"

[hater]

Dear Dr Ron Paul withe da goods :tu

True American patriot

“You get accused of treasonous activity and treasonous speech because in an empire of lies the truth is treason,” Paul said. “Challenging the status quo is what they can’t stand and it unnerves them, so they have to silence people.”

:tu

[Pavlov]

1026948608237551616Read about it on twitter!

[Reck]

1026948608237551616

Is like he's daring Twitter to ban him too. :lol

[Chris]

Is like he's daring Twitter to ban him too. :lol

2rAjily7rME

[Reck]

Chris doing the trolling thing.

[DMX7]

It would be hysterical if Twitter bans him too.

[Spurtacular]

It would be hysterical if Twitter bans him too.

Yea, fascism is just ever so hysterical.

[Blake]

Yea, fascism is just ever so hysterical.

:lol "fascism"

[Pavlov]

:lol "fascism"Even when they are in full control of the government, Republicans need to feel aggrieved.

[Spurtacular]

Even when they are in full control of the government, Republicans need to feel aggrieved.

So, now you're saying that the govt. is the perpetrators.

:lmao Sociopath chump can't pick a lane.

[Pavlov]

So, now you're saying that the govt. is the perpetrators.

:lmao Sociopath chump can't pick a lane.No, I'm continuing to mock your use of the work fascism.

You just want to be a victim really, really badly.

[Blake]

When Republicans do it, it's called free market capitalism bakery owner rights etc

[Blake]

So, now you're saying that the govt. is the perpetrators.

:lmao Sociopath chump can't pick a lane.

How do you come up with these retarded conclusions

[Pavlov]

When Republicans do it, it's called free market capitalism bakery owner rights etcNO TEH GHEYS DEMANDED HATE CAKES

[leemajors]

IN AN EMPIRE OF LIES, TRUTH IS TREASON

thank you Dr Paul.

Im gonna use that from now on :tu

Hey dip, that's an Orwell quote.

[ElNono]

What are the limits on free speech and how did Alex Jones violate those limits? Can someone answer since RandomGuy is too chickenshit to explain his own words?

Sure. He can sue and test the limits within his contractual obligation. That's the forum civilized countries use to solve disputes. Plus, America has a relatively speedy court system, so he shouldn't need to wait that long.

[hater]

Hey dip, that's an Orwell quote.

Yes and ai will use it from now on :tu

Thanks Dr Paul

[DMX7]

Yea, fascism is just ever so hysterical.

:rollin

You don't know the meaning of the word "fascism".

[monosylab1k]

Free Speech is limited on non-government-owned channels with terms and conditions that you must agree to prior to communicating on those channels.

Alex Jones violated this limit by saying things that are against their terms and conditions despite agreeing to them.


The limits on speech for those platforms are whatever the owners of those platforms want them to be. They are clearly listed in each platform's terms of service.

Alex Jones violated the hate speech, bullying and violence terms of service he agreed to.

Pretty simple stuff. I can see how you would struggle with it.


https://media.giphy.com/media/xUA7b1iEuTwIj47n8c/200w.gif

[DMC]

Fuck Alex Jones. He was a slobbering idiot when he was in Austin and he's still one. he doesn't believe anything he says, just a snake oil salesman, the WWE of talk radio.

[leemajors]

Fuck Alex Jones. He was a slobbering idiot when he was in Austin and he's still one. he doesn't believe anything he says, just a snake oil salesman, the WWE of talk radio.
I bet those supplements are selling like hot cakes!

[Blake]

Hey dip, that's an Orwell quote.

:lol

[DMC]

I bet those supplements are selling like hot cakes!

Every road leads to heritage firearms..

Then it must be on Burnet, it has a billion roads attached to it.

[hater]

WAR IS PEACE

FREEDOM IS SLAVERY

IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH

[monosylab1k]

WAR IS PEACE

FREEDOM IS SLAVERY

IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH

https://www.reddit.com/r/im14andthisisdeep/

[Spurminator]

:lol

1026805202580647936

[Pavlov]

:lol

1026805202580647936Oh, Millie....

:lmao

[Winehole23]

The media/tech bosses decide who has free speech.Presumably analog opportunities for expression still exist, but I see what you mean.

A hue and cry was set up to do something about fake news. The US Senate hauled techies up to Capitol Hill to express their concern.

This is what it looks like.

[Winehole23]

It could be worse. The US Congress could pass a law regulating fake news, like Egypt.

[Chris]

1026984242893357056
1026984247750316033
1026984251944722433

[Isitjustme?]

1027007293215453184

[Chris]

jack bad now :lol

[Isitjustme?]

jack bad now :lol

So hes good?

[Pavlov]

jack bad now :lolNope, just as the ones who did the banning aren't good now for banning anyone.

They're just doing what they want with their companies.

[boutons_deux]

Repug dickless authoritarians want Trash to shutdown non-rightwing shit holes

Nearly half of Republicans say Trump should have ‘authority to close news outlets if they behave badly’: poll

a plurality of Republican voters (https://www.thedailybeast.com/new-poll-43-of-republicans-want-to-give-trump-the-power-to-shut-down-media?via=twitter_page) want President Donald Trump to be able to shut down media outlets if he decides they have engaged in “bad behavior.”

The Ipsos poll, first reported by The Daily Beast, found that 43 percent of Republicans believe

“the (Repug) president should have the authority to close (non-right-wing) news outlets engaged in bad behavior.”

Thirty-six percent of Republicans surveyed said that the president should not have the power to silence the press.

About a quarter of Republicans also said that Trump should shutter mainstream outlets like CNN and The Washington Post.

Twenty-eight percent agreed with Trump’s statement that the media are an “enemy of the people.”

And 79 percent said that media treats Trump “unfairly.” :lol

https://www.rawstory.com/2018/08/nearly-half-republicans-say-trump-authority-close-news-outlets-behave-badly-poll/ (https://www.rawstory.com/2018/08/nearly-half-republicans-say-trump-authority-close-news-outlets-behave-badly-poll/)

Repug whore pols elected by you Repug assholes are a major reason that America is fucked and unfuckable.

STers are upset about InfoWars being banned. :lol

Private companies banning AJ could be interpreted as weaponized free speech, iow, private companies expressing themselves "as people" without restraint.

How would you rightwingnutjob assholes feel about a "lawless" Obama, thinking he was treated "unfairly", shutting down Fox News, Breitbart, and Sinclair for "bad behaviour"? :lol

[hater]

:lmao thinking facebook is a social network :lmao

Its nothing but a data mining farm where users are the cattle :lol

So glad ai never fell for that :lol

[hater]

Not to mention they have aboit 250 million burner/fake accounts and count them as real to their investors :lmao

[boutons_deux]

Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey defends failure to ban Alex Jones

Jack Dorsey refuses to follow Apple, Facebook and YouTube in banning Jones, saying he will be guided by principles rather than pressure

saying Jones’s content “hasn’t violated our rules” (https://twitter.com/jack/status/1026984249960755200).

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/aug/08/jack-dorsey-defends-failure-to-ban-alex-jones-from-twitter

iow, Dorsey's "principles" place twitter traffic, "buzz", revenue above hate speech and incitement to violence and murder.

[Chris]

Liberal Democrats censoring speech on the campus and now social media. They want to completely indoctrinate our youth so Donald Trump NEVER happens again.

[Reck]

Liberal Democrats censoring speech on the campus and now social media. They want to completely indoctrinate our youth so Donald Trump NEVER happens again.

Chris, go make yourself some fresh coffee. It's kinda early for wacky conspiracies.

[monosylab1k]

:lol

1026805202580647936

:lmao

She passes the IQ requirement for Spurstalk Conservatives tbh.

[Spurtacular]

:lmao

She passes the IQ requirement for Spurstalk Conservatives tbh.

:lmao Because she squashed your private company argument? :lmao

[Blake]

:lmao Because she squashed your private company argument? :lmao

Damn you're stupid. Really stupid.

[monosylab1k]

:lmao Because she squashed your private company argument? :lmao

:lmao case in point.

[Spurtacular]

Damn you're stupid. Really stupid.

Cuck blake mindlessly bland template posting. Who would've guessed? :lmao

[Blake]

Cuck blake mindlessly bland template posting. Who would've guessed? :lmao

For you, yes, you get the template.

I'd try to explain but you'll just get frustrated and revert to your fallback lines and emoticons any way.

[diego]

:lmao Because she squashed your private company argument? :lmao

Damn, I always thought you were mostly trolling, turns out you're dumber than Chris

None of the first amendment warriors here have anything to say about infowars' ToS and the blatant hipocrisy of Jones crying about having those same rules applied to him?

[Winehole23]

jack bad now :lolNot at all.

If Jack has the ability to ban Alex Jones, then he implicitly also has the ability not to ban him.

Banning and not banning are both consistent with his right of free association.

[benefactor]

:lmao Because she squashed your private company argument? :lmao
https://media2.giphy.com/media/X3nnss8PAj5aU/200w.webp

[RandomGuy]

:lol

1026805202580647936

(winces)

The stupid... it burns...

[RandomGuy]

:lmao Because she squashed your private company argument? :lmao

Holeee shit, you think she was right?

You are never living this shit down.


the term private corporation refers to any business not owned by the state
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privately_held_company

Being traded publicly on an authorized stock exchange still means you are a private company in the sense that the government does not specifically own the company.

If every publicly traded company were truly "public" that would make the US a communist state for all intents and purposes.

[Pavlov]

:lol she's quintupling down:

1026923303775162370

1026927134332407808

1027212042292396040

1027221173506138113

[RandomGuy]

https://media.boingboing.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/giphy-6.gif

FIFY. :D

[RandomGuy]

:lol she's quintupling down:

1026923303775162370

1026927134332407808

1027212042292396040

1027221173506138113

https://media.giphy.com/media/kwQfk9zUJ6eVq/giphy.gif

[RandomGuy]

Perhaps some budding young capitalist could explain it to her. That was, and is, seriously dumb.

https://i.imgur.com/d2KCb43.png

Welcome to Mount Stupid Spurtaclur[ly stupid]

[Quadzilla99]

https://www.reddit.com/r/im14andthisisdeep/
:lmao

[Spurtacular]

None of the first amendment warriors here have anything to say about infowars' ToS and the blatant hipocrisy of Jones crying about having those same rules applied to him?

:lmao "First amendment warriors"
:lmao Today's dickhead
:lmao "hipocrisy"

[benefactor]

^could be worse...he could be dumb as a desk chair

[Spurtacular]

^could be worse...he could be dumb as a desk chair

:lmao Permanently triggered.

[RandomGuy]

:lmao Permanently triggered.

:lmao public companies

[Blake]

:lmao public companies

:lol

[Pavlov]

:lmao public companies
:lmao permanently derp

[Spurtacular]

Publicly traded corporation.

:lol Chumpettes cackling.

[Pavlov]

Publicly traded corporation.

:lol Chumpettes cackling.:lol Millie

[Spurtacular]

:lol Millie

Great reporter.

Meanwhile in chump land:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dzaWCpHRGfk

:rollin

[diego]

Publicly traded corporation.

:lol Chumpettes cackling.

Still haven't figured out the difference between a private and public company, damn it's gotta hurt to be this stupid

And thanks for the spell check, let me know when you have something of substance to say about Jones :cry censoring :cry his forums for the same reason and by the same means

[Pavlov]

Great reporter.

Meanwhile in chump land:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dzaWCpHRGfk

:rollin:lmao incel white knight

[Blake]

Publicly traded corporation.

:lol Chumpettes cackling.

Oh he's still going with this.

Anyone else might be a surprise.

[RandomGuy]

Publicly traded corporation.

:lol Chumpettes cackling.

:lmao cackling publicly.


the term private corporation refers to any business not owned by the state.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privately_held_company

[RandomGuy]

Privately held companies are not subject to the 1st amendment, being private, and not governmental actors.

If your argument is based on holding non-governmental entities accountable under the first amendment:


Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

You have to tell me how Facebook is "Congress".

[vy65]

:lmao Because she squashed your private company argument? :lmao

Did your mom drink bleach when she was preggo w/you?

[Pavlov]

LOOK I MAKE PUBLIC POSTS ON FACEBOOK ALL THE TIME SO OF COURSE IT'S PROTECTED BY THE CONSTITUTION SINCE IT'S A CIA FRONT

[Chucho]

Did your mom drink bleach when she was preggo w/you?

With the "how often do you beat your wife" jab yesterday, you're proving to be the ST Expert on overused,edgy cliche digs.

[Chucho]

But you're right in the assertion that Derp is a moron.

[Blake]

With the "how often do you beat your wife" jab yesterday, you're proving to be the ST Expert on overused,edgy cliche digs.

"...beat your wife?" is the de facto return response for retarded loaded questions. Not really edgy tbh.

[Chucho]

"...beat your wife?" is the de facto return response for retarded loaded questions. Not really edgy tbh.


Oh snap, didn't know that. Updating muh notes.

[spurraider21]

:lmao Because she squashed your private company argument? :lmao
:lmao omg

[vy65]

With the "how often do you beat your wife" jab yesterday, you're proving to be the ST Expert on overused,edgy cliche digs.


"...beat your wife?" is the de facto return response for retarded loaded questions. Not really edgy tbh.

:lmao

[Spurtacular]

Privately held companies are not subject to the 1st amendment, being private, and not governmental actors.

If your argument is based on holding non-governmental entities accountable under the first amendment:



You have to tell me how Facebook is "Congress".

Sorry, but Americans created their own terms of services from the start. If you don't like them, move to Russia.

[Blake]

Sorry, but Americans created their own terms of services from the start. If you don't like them, move to Russia.

That doesn't make any sense.

[koriwhat]

Great reporter.

Meanwhile in chump land:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dzaWCpHRGfk

:rollin

fucking lmao!

[Spurtacular]

That doesn't make any sense.

Maybe, you should get a tutor.

[koriwhat]

Maybe, you should get a tutor.

he had one in sancho but sancho was giving bitchboyblake's ol' lady the after school special and he couldn't keep up.

[koriwhat]

i'm going to be the next victim of the left when cuckblake decides he's pro-gun finally. lmao! let's get this party started already!

[Spurtacular]

he had one in sancho but sancho was giving bitchboyblake's ol' lady the after school special and he couldn't keep up.

:lmao

Who is sancho? Screen name?

[Chris]

lmao @ sancho

[Spurtacular]

lmao @ sancho

Who? Got blake running.

[Chris]

A sancho is a Mexican term for a guy who sleeps with your wife while the husband is away :lol

[koriwhat]

A sancho is a Mexican term for a guy who sleeps with your wife while the husband is away :lol

but in blake's case, blake was soaking them couch cushions as he pushed his face further in the cushions to drown out the O's and Ah's by his ol' lady while getting the one-two combo from sancho.

[Blake]

No obsession here. None.

[DarrinS]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWd6XgBVIcg

[koriwhat]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWd6XgBVIcg

funny shit but far left superdeluxe has no idea the implosion they're pushing with this alex jones bit. just going to make the zombies look into him if they don't know who he is already. same with all these platforms banning him.

don't do drugs kids 'cause they're bad.... ok lets do some drugs!

[Chris]

funny shit but far left superdeluxe has no idea the implosion they're pushing with this alex jones bit. just going to make the zombies look into him if they don't know who he is already. same with all these platforms banning him.

don't do drugs kids 'cause they're bad.... ok lets do some drugs!

I think he has like 5 million new subscribers since the coordinated deplatforming. :lol

[DarrinS]

funny shit but far left superdeluxe has no idea the implosion they're pushing with this alex jones bit. just going to make the zombies look into him if they don't know who he is already. same with all these platforms banning him.

don't do drugs kids 'cause they're bad.... ok lets do some drugs!


Joe Rogan was talking to Jimmy Dore about the Alex Jones situation and this video was brought up.

I think they make some good points here.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SgB-pmwlwDw

[koriwhat]

I think he has like 5 million new subscribers since the coordinated deplatforming. :lol

hoping that might equate to 5 million less libs in the future... :tu

[Chris]

hoping that might equate to 5 million less libs in the future... :tu

:tu

[DarrinS]

hoping that might equate to 5 million less libs in the future... :tu

Meh. If you’re trying to influence libs to #walkaway, Alex Jones isn’t the messenger you want. :lol

[koriwhat]

Meh. If you’re trying to influence libs to #walkaway, Alex Jones isn’t the messenger you want. :lol

no one should walk away, they should all run away and as fast as they can!

[Winehole23]

tangential:


A senior Facebook (https://www.theguardian.com/technology/facebook) executive told Australian media companies that if they didn’t cooperate with the social network, their businesses would die.


According to a report by The Australian (https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/zuckerberg-doesnt-care-about-traditional-media/news-story/d1be791f1b91e3c1fc609cf8979b72e2), Campbell Brown, Facebook’s head of news partnerships, told a group of more than 20 broadcasters and publishers that she wanted to help media companies develop sustainable business models through the platform.

“We will help you revitalise journalism … in a few years the *reverse looks like I’ll be holding your hands with your dying *business like in a hospice,” she said, in comments corroborated by five people who attended the meeting in Sydney on Tuesday.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/aug/13/facebook-news-media-campbell-brown-hospice?CMP=twt_gu

[Winehole23]

Facebook employees said privately over the past several months that Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg wants to outsource many of the most sensitive political decisions, leaving fact-checking to media groups and geopolitics to think tanks.https://www.reuters.com/article/us-facebook-cyber/u-s-think-tanks-tiny-lab-helps-facebook-battle-fake-social-media-idUSKBN1KS22N

[boutons_deux]

FCC Shuts Down Alex Jones’ Flagship Pirate Radio Station In TexasLiberty Radio had broadcast the far-right conspiracy theorist’s show without authorization for years.

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/fcc-alex-jones-liberty-radio_us_5b74c883e4b0182d49b03afe?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=__TheMorningEmail__081618&utm_content=__TheMorningEmail__081618+CID_63404324 0fc3a4da374f737b71311643&utm_source=Email%20marketing%20software&utm_term=HuffPost&ncid=newsltushpmgnews__TheMorningEmail__081618

Who in the Repug FCC is going after Jones, Jones being one of Trash's trusted advisors?

[RandomGuy]

Meh. If you’re trying to influence libs to #walkaway, Alex Jones isn’t the messenger you want. :lol

LOL #Walkaway

Fake news.

[RandomGuy]

:lmao

Who is sancho? Screen name?

Is Sancho a publicly traded company? :lmao

[RandomGuy]

Privately held companies are not subject to the 1st amendment, being private, and not governmental actors.

If your argument is based on holding non-governmental entities accountable under the first amendment:

You have to tell me how Facebook is "Congress".



Sorry, but Americans created their own terms of services from the start. If you don't like them, move to Russia.

Loooooossssseeerrrr

[Winehole23]

the next Speaker of the House doesn't know how twitter settings work.

1030501196879089670

[Chris]

nah...Jack admitted Twitter is left leaning :tu

1030984312592760832

[ElNono]

"Are we doing something according to political ideology or viewpoints? We are not. Period," Dorsey claimed during the interview, which took place on Friday. "We do not look at content with regards to political viewpoint or ideology. We look at behavior."

[DMX7]

"Are we doing something according to political ideology or viewpoints? We are not. Period," Dorsey claimed during the interview, which took place on Friday. "We do not look at content with regards to political viewpoint or ideology. We look at behavior."

If it were truly "left-leaning" and just looking at "behavior" then Trump would have been banned long ago. He has used Twitter to literally blackmail political opponents.

712457104515317764

[Chris]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DkCZFkNU4AAEtyP.jpg:large

I'm guessing this is considered good behavior?

#VerifiedHate

[Chris]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DkEUoiGX0AEHIlD.jpg:large

[Chris]

https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia.giphy.com%2Fmedia%2FVJ2B0I6 t2HEUE%2Fgiphy.gif&f=1

[Winehole23]

Chris wants a fairness doctrine for the internet because he doesn't like unfair outcomes in the free market.

Nanny state to the rescue of hurtin pup conservatives and alt-lite snowflakes.

[Winehole23]

HUD goes after discriminatory Facebook ads:


The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development said in an administrative complaint this week that Facebook violated the Fair Housing Act because its targeting systems allow advertisers to exclude certain audiences, such as families with young children or disabled people, from seeing housing ads.
"When Facebook uses the vast amount of personal data it collects to help advertisers to discriminate, it's the same as slamming the door in someone's face," HUD Assistant Secretary Anna María Farias said in a statement Friday.
https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory/us-regulators-target-facebook-discriminatory-housing-ads-57245923

[boutons_deux]

HUD goes after discriminatory Facebook ads:

https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory/us-regulators-target-facebook-discriminatory-housing-ads-57245923

hilarious, because HUD intends to kill an Obama rule that lessened racism in HUD buildings.

HUD seeks to change Obama-era fair housing rule

https://www.upi.com/HUD-seeks-to-change-Obama-era-fair-housing-rule/3881534204742/?tt=4

[Winehole23]

off topic, but more crocodile tears.

Georgia wants to shut down 75% of polling stations in a rural, majority black county because, not ADA compliant:

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/08/georgia-voter-suppression-brian-kemps-bid-for-governor-depends-on-erasing-the-black-vote-its-working.html

[boutons_deux]

Pretending To Defend Free Speech, Trump Backs Conspiracy MongersTrump is an enemy of free speech, arguing in favor of laws (https://shareblue.com/trump-threatens-new-law-to-stop-people-from-making-him-look-bad/) that would help him sue the press and repeatedly declaring the press is the “Opposition Party (https://shareblue.com/trump-journalists-opposition-party-newspaper-shooting/)” and “the enemy (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1008506045373845504) of the people.” But now, as his allies face consequences for spreading hate on social media,

Trump is posturing as a free speech supporter. :lol

In a series of tweets,

Trump falsely claimed (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1030777074959757313) that “Social Media is totally discriminating against Republican/Conservative voices.”

He said, “They are closing down the opinions of many people on the RIGHT, while at the same time doing nothing to others.”
He went on to write (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1030781399920455681), “Too many voices are being destroyed, some good & some bad, and that cannot be allowed to happen.”

Trump is no free speech warrior.

For years, Trump has crusaded (https://www.mediamatters.org/trumps-war-on-the-press) against the press for exercising its First Amendment rights.

And Trump has said (https://www.mediamatters.org/video/2016/02/26/donald-trump-promises-to-sue-the-media-for-nega/208842) he wants to “open up our libel laws” so he can sue outlets that report negative stories about him.
From the presidency, Trump decreed (https://shareblue.com/sarah-huckabee-sanders-press-enemy-of-the-people-jim-acosta/) that the press is “the enemy of the people,” and his underlings amplify his attacks on reporters in this vein.

As part of a cynical strategy (https://shareblue.com/lesley-stahl-trump-press-attacks-deadline-club-awards/) to deflect from critical news stories, Trump calls those reports “fake news,” a term his supporters, like Jones, echo (https://www.mediamatters.org/video/2018/02/22/alex-jones-fake-women-werent-even-real-said-trump-raped-them-were-made-media/219471)constantly.
Trump isn’t defending free speech — he’s always against it if it means people speaking out against him and exposing his abuses and lies.

http://www.nationalmemo.com/pretending-to-defend-free-speech-trump-backs-conspiracy-mongers/

[djohn2oo8]

1037804328977920002

[Spurminator]

Unless YouTube bans him, this doesn't mean anything except to give him something to implode about for his audience.

[Blake]

1037804328977920002

Derp what's your constitutional opinion on this

[boutons_deux]

Trash should be banned by Twitter, for daily abuse of the truth

[Pavlov]

Derp what's your constitutional opinion on this

Then the government has a lawful expectation that Constitutional rights of Americans will not be violated by the services they 'significantly' help to facilitate, particularly as it relates to "public forums.":lmao

[Reck]

Alex Jones was caught with Tranny porn so derp naturally loves him and will be super mad about this.

[Reck]

Unless YouTube bans him, this doesn't mean anything except to give him something to implode about for his audience.

Where have you been? Youtube deleted his channel early last month.

[RandomGuy]

1037804328977920002

See my other thread. It was soooo delicious watching Jones go off on Rubio.

[Spurminator]

Where have you been? Youtube deleted his channel early last month.

You're right, I don't know why I was thinking they hadn't. Maybe I was actually thinking of Twitter keeping him on when Youtube deleted him.

Oh well. Good riddance.

[koriwhat]

who cares really? yall hate the dude but create threads about him that reach 15 pgs deep. yall sure yall hate jones?

[ducks]

it is fucking amazing rush is even on allowed on the radio now days
I can not stand listening to him but ...

[Pavlov]

who cares really? yall hate the dude but create threads about him that reach 15 pgs deep. yall sure yall hate jones?Do you like Alex Jones?

[ducks]

Do you like Alex Jones?

does not matter if you like him or not
it is wrong to ban convertives and liberals from social media.
both have a place on the internet

[Pavlov]

does not matter if you like him or not
it is wrong to ban convertives and liberals from social media.
both have a place on the internetSure, as long as they abide by the private companies' terms of service.

There is no right to a Twitter account.

Pretty simple.

[ducks]

Why is is ok for twitter not to allow him but a baker according to you must make a transgender a cake
Even though they are a private company

[koriwhat]

Do you like Alex Jones?

i don't watch the dude but i don't hate him either and don't think stifling speech, because there's pussies out there who get their feelings hurt, is proactive.

as well, stop asking me anything pavTHETIC. take your dumbass questions and go fuck yourself.

[Pavlov]

i don't watch the dude but i don't hate him either and don't think stifling speech, because there's pussies out there who get their feelings hurt, is proactive.

as well, stop asking me anything pavTHETIC. take your dumbass questions and go fuck yourself.:lol you were just whining that there was no discussion here. I try to start a discussion with you and you meltdown.

[koriwhat]

:lol you were just whining that there was no discussion here. I try to start a discussion with you and you meltdown.

there's no melting down over here as much as you'd love to believe it. i simply just don't fucking give a damn about you. i really think you're a fucking piece of shit pav. that's it. fuck off.

[angrydude]

Twitter has ISIS accounts. There are videos of all sorts of terrible things uploaded to twitter every day. But a video of Alex Jones yelling at someone is abuse. So stupid.

[Pavlov]

there's no melting down over here as much as you'd love to believe it. i simply just don't fucking give a damn about you. i really think you're a fucking piece of shit pav. that's it. fuck off.Then quit slavishly responding to me, dumbass.

[koriwhat]

Twitter has ISIS accounts. There are videos of all sorts of terrible things uploaded to twitter every day. But a video of Alex Jones yelling at someone is abuse. So stupid.

i finally say something on twitter and i got banned again but this time for telling a MAP, better known as a Pedophile, that we'd all be better off with his kind hanging from the highest bridge. they allow open pedophiles on their platform but not people who oppose such predators. sickening! then again, jack dorsey looks the type so go figure.

[koriwhat]

Then quit slavishly responding to me, dumbass.

if you weren't constantly blowing up my damn "quote" box then i'd not deal with you at all. you're such a fucking faggot.

[Pavlov]

if you weren't constantly blowing up my damn "quote" box then i'd not deal with you at all. you're such a fucking faggot.:lol just stop responding.

Have a little willpower.

[Spurminator]

Twitter has ISIS accounts.

They do? Have you reported those accounts?

[Trill Clinton]

Twitter got him the fucc outta here:lol

[Blake]

who cares really? yall hate the dude but create threads about him that reach 15 pgs deep. yall sure yall hate jones?

Look how soft you are on this asshole Jones but you wish death for Hillary.

[Blake]

there's no melting down over here as much as you'd love to believe it. i simply just don't fucking give a damn about you. i really think you're a fucking piece of shit pav. that's it. fuck off.

THERE'S NO MELTING DOWN HERE

[FrostKing]

So what happened? Did Alex use the N-word or something

[ducks]

You mean the n would ******

[koriwhat]

Look how soft you are on this asshole Jones but you wish death for Hillary.

how am i soft on jones if i don't even give a fuck about jones? and who gives a fuck anyhow? fuck hillary and hope she and bill are in front of a firing squad soon enough!

[Blake]

who gives a fuck anyhow? fuck hillary and hope she and bill are in front of a firing squad soon enough!

Why do you give such a fuck about the Clintons? What did they do to you?

[koriwhat]

Why do you give such a fuck about the Clintons? What did they do to you?

i fucking hate them and everything they stand for. that's all you need to know.

[Blake]

i fucking hate them and everything they stand for. that's all you need to know.

Yeah I figured it was irrational.

[Winehole23]

Unless YouTube bans him, this doesn't mean anything except to give him something to implode about for his audience.deplatforming Alex Jones limits his reach significantly.

free speech has consequences. if you abuse your invitations to speak, harass people and unduly piss them off, the podium might be taken away.

[Pavlov]

He lasted about six hours. Who greenlit this in the first place?
1085343064418267136

[Pavlov]

dupe.

I will add :lol Alex J:lolnes

[Blake]

He lasted about six hours. Who greenlit this in the first place?
1085343064418267136

Lol Infowars channel

[Spurminator]

1085359042665402369

:lmao these redpill idiots.

[Spurtacular]

:lmao

http://www.informationliberation.com/files/free-press-demands-alex-jones-be-banned.jpg

[Winehole23]

Seems to be going around.

1111715732340047872

[Blake]

Seems to be going around.

1111715732340047872

He's psychotic? No way

[boutons_deux]

How Alex Jones and Infowars Helped a Florida Man Stalk Sandy Hook Families

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/29/us/politics/alex-jones-infowars-sandy-hook.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Thanks, Texas!

[Winehole23]

He's psychotic? No wayHe says he is.The media made him so.

:cry

[boutons_deux]

In his last trial, his lawyer claimed AJs bullshit is all an act, netting AJ $10Ms.

Americans are so fucking stupid, ignorant and they love to be conned, but never admit that they are easy marks for the con man.

So now AJ is both an "act" and claiming insanity.

[Spurs Homer]

Notice something that this idiot and the traitor in chief have in common;

If you see clips of Alex Jones deposition and Trump deposition in one of his cases Trump was sued - then you will notice something they share;

When they are talking to their CULT - they are animated, loud - basically performing -

when they are under oath -

they are quiet and are struggling not to step on their own lies - they are terrified of contradicting their own bullshit.

How any idiot - like TSA -or Qhris -

manages to not see through their carnival barker bullshit - is a testament to how gullible and stupid cult zombies can be.

:lol:lol

[Spurs Homer]

:cry:cry

"psychosis"

[Blake]

He says he is.The media made him so.

:cry

Finally he says something that I believe

[Winehole23]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D26vy35UcAAGbGC.jpg

[koriwhat]

:cry:cry

"psychosis"

describes you to a T!

[Blake]

describes you to a T!

Describes the nut you defended on this board

[koriwhat]

Describes the nut you defended on this board

i've never defended you you fucking loon! :lmao

[Blake]

i've never defended you you fucking loon! :lmao

Smh

[koriwhat]

Smh

keep shaking that bobble head of yours... it's not like you have a brain in there anyhow to harm. do the twist too while you're at it you spineless cuck!

[Blake]

keep shaking that bobble head of yours... it's not like you have a brain in there anyhow to harm. do the twist too while you're at it you spineless cuck!


these are your fantasies and not mine. your fantasies say a lot about you tbh.

[koriwhat]

poor cuck black :cry

[Blake]

poor cuck black :cry

Lol "cuck black"


these are your fantasies and not mine. your fantasies say a lot about you tbh.

[koriwhat]

Lol "cuck black"

it's that new nick... typo's are a hell of a thing!

[Blake]

it's that new nick... typo's are a hell of a thing!

Lol "typo"

[koriwhat]

Lol "typo"

now that i reread it and as i try to put myself into that bobble head of yours i can see why you think it's no typo and how it certainly pertains to you.

[Spurs Homer]

lol
"psychosis" is the reason I buy into conspiracy theories 24/7


TSA - are you suffering from "psychosis" like your hero?


:lmao:lmao