Jim Acosta Out!

[Spurtacular]

lol lying about law classes and what I said.

:lol Running....

Acosta physically handled the woman against her will. You have not said that that is not okay.

[Pavlov]

:lol Running....

Acosta physically handled the woman against her will. You have not said that that is not okay.
:lol now you're acting like she was kidnapped.

You don't give a shit about women so don't start now.

I already said he shouldn't have done what he did.

Where did you get your legal education you keep bragging about?

[Spurtacular]

:lol now you're acting like she was kidnapped.

You don't give a shit about women so don't start now.

I already said he shouldn't have done what he did.

Where did you get your legal education you keep bragging about?

:lol All that lashing out cos you have no defense for Jimmy.

"Shouldn't have done what he did" makes it sound advisory rather a matter of right/wrong.

[Pavlov]

:lol All that lashing out cos you have no defense for Jimmy.

"Shouldn't have done what he did" makes it sound advisory rather a matter of right/wrong.
:lol no

I can't prevent you from making a retarded inference.

[Spurtacular]

:lol no

I can't prevent you from making a retarded inference.

Is physically handling a woman against her will a terminable offense?

[Pavlov]

Is physically handling a woman against her will a terminable offense?What Acosta did is not, but good idea for you to move the goalpost.

:lmao again with the dramatic terms.

[Spurtacular]

What Acosta did is not, but good idea for you to move the goalpost.

:lmao again with the dramatic terms.

No goalpost moving. This is a simple progression.

Is physically handling a woman against her will a terminable offense?

[Pavlov]

No goalpost moving. This is a simple progression.

Is physically handling a woman against her will a terminable offense?I already said what Acosta did is not.

:lol you moved the goalpost from muh Law 100 criminal assault prosecution to workplace policy.

[Spurtacular]

I already said what Acosta did is not.

:lmao Sociopath conveniently not finishing sentences properly (and with clarity). Par.

Is physically handling a woman against her will a terminable offense?

Yes or no.

[Pavlov]

:lmao Sociopath conveniently not finishing sentences properly (and with clarity). Par.

Is physically handling a woman against her will a terminable offense?

Yes or no.I already said what Acosta did is not a terminable offense.

What part of that do you not understand?

[Spurtacular]

I already said what Acosta did is not a terminable offense.

What part of that do you not understand?

:lmao Second time in a short time you said you "already" said something when you didn't.
:lmao Today's sociopath

[Pavlov]

:lmao Second time in a short time you said you "already" said something when you didn't.
:lmao Today's sociopathI can't understand sentences for you, derp.:lmao

[Spurtacular]

I already said what Acosta did is not a terminable offense.




I didn't ask you to make a specific evaluation of the Acosta incident. Sociopath still trying to be slick.

I asked, is physically handling a woman against her will a terminable offense?

Yes or no.

[Pavlov]

I didn't ask you to make a specific evaluation of the Acosta incident. Sociopath still trying to be slick.

I asked, is physically handling a woman against her will a terminable offense?

Yes or no.You'd have to describe every possible scenario and take it up with every HR department and manager in the world, derp.

Then you'll have your answer.

Get to it, slick.

[Spurtacular]

You'd have to describe every possible scenario and take it up with every HR department and manager in the world, derp.

Then you'll have your answer.

Get to it, slick.

So, you're saying that it can be a terminable offense but that there are exceptions to the rule? Tell us about some of these exceptions.

[Pavlov]

So, you're saying that it can be a terminable offense but that there are exceptions to the rule? Tell us about some of these exceptions.I'm saying every workplace and situation is different. We're talking about Acosta. You can't understand that and now you want your hand to be held and go into the weeds.:lmao

[Spurtacular]

I'm saying every workplace and situation is different. We're talking about Acosta. You can't understand that and now you want your hand to be held and go into the weeds.:lmao

Explain how physically handling a woman is not a terminable offense. What makes Jimmy have this privilege apparently?

[Pavlov]

Explain how physically handling a woman is not a terminable offense. What makes Jimmy have this privilege apparently?Because it's not what you're breathlessly trying to make it out to be, derp.

You're a snowflake and this isn't a big deal.

Sorry to ruin your dreams.

[Spurtacular]

Because it's not what you're breathlessly trying to make it out to be, derp.

You're a snowflake and this isn't a big deal.

Sorry to ruin your dreams.

Ah. It's not a big deal for Acosta to physically handle a woman against her will you say. Got it :tu

[CosmicCowboy]

I think chump has already agreed acosta acted inappropriately and the White House had grounds to pull his press pass.

[Pavlov]

Ah. It's not a big deal for Acosta to physically handle a woman against her will you say. Got it :tuDescribe the "physical handling."

You can't even say he put a hand on her. How can you physically handle someone you don't even put a hand on, derp?

[Spurtacular]

Describe the "physical handling."

You can't even say he put a hand on her. How can you physically handle someone you don't even put a hand on, derp?

He forcefully repelled her to prevent her from doing her job. You say that this is not a terminable offense for some reason. You are okay with violence towards women as long as it doesn't meet a certain threshold.

[Spurtacular]

I think chump has already agreed acosta acted inappropriately and the White House had grounds to pull his press pass.

Not that I recall.

[Pavlov]

forcefully repelled violence:lmao buzzwords.

He moved his hand down which had he effect of moving her hand further down on the hand in which he held the mic.

:lmao "violence"

You're a dainty, girly little snowflake.

[CosmicCowboy]

Chump has already agreed Acosta crossed the line. You guys have just spent all day arguing the physical level.

[Pavlov]

I think chump has already agreed acosta acted inappropriately and the White House had grounds to pull his press pass.Yep, they can revoke it for any reason.

[Pavlov]

Chump has already agreed Acosta crossed the line. You guys have just spent all day arguing the physical level.Been fun watching him play it up as flat out murder.

[Spurtacular]

:lmao buzzwords.

He moved his hand down which had he effect of moving her hand further down on the hand in which he held the mic.

:lmao "violence"

You're a dainty, girly little snowflake.

Acosta physically handled her in an intimidating and forceful manner. Even elementary school kids aren't allowed to do that at school; yet somehow you think this is acceptable behavior at a White House press conference.

:lmao Today's sociopath

[CosmicCowboy]

:lol now you're acting like she was kidnapped.

You don't give a shit about women so don't start now.

I already said he shouldn't have done what he did.

Where did you get your legal education you keep bragging about?

[CosmicCowboy]

If he shouldn't have done what he did the White House has grounds to revoke his pass

[Pavlov]

elementary school kids aren't allowed to do that at schoolYou were home schooled or else you would never say anything remotely like that. There are fights over rubber balls more vicious than your snowflake assault.

[Pavlov]

If he shouldn't have done what he did the White House has grounds to revoke his passThe White House doesn't even need grounds, but sure -- they can make up whatever rule they want.

[CosmicCowboy]

The White House doesn't need grounds.

True. Thanks for agreeing that CNN and Acostas lawsuit is bullshit.

[Spurtacular]

You were home schooled or else you would never say anything remotely like that. There are fights over rubber balls more vicious than your snowflake assault.

:lmao No
:lmao That you are trying to claim that forceful physical interaction is an accepted norm for elementary children
:lmao Today's sociopath

[Spurtacular]

True. Thanks for agreeing that CNN and Acostas lawsuit is bullshit.

He didn't agree that Acosta crossed a line. He's just being slick with you, dude.

[Pavlov]

True. Thanks for agreeing that CNN and Acostas lawsuit is bullshit.Sure. None of this is a big deal at all.

[Pavlov]

:lmao No
:lmao That you are trying to claim that forceful physical interaction is an accepted norm for elementary children
:lmao Today's sociopathNo elementary student has ever been terminated for an action like Acosta's.

[Pavlov]

He didn't agree that Acosta crossed a line. He's just being slick with you, dude.You've gone full sociopath.

[Spurtacular]

No elementary student has ever been terminated for an action like Acosta's.

Not really what I was arguing; but yea, elementary school students have been expelled for landing karate chops I'm sure.

[Spurtacular]

You've gone full sociopath.

Are you stating that Acosta crossed a line?

[Will Hunting]

Not really what I was arguing; but yea, elementary school students have been expelled for landing karate chops I'm sure.
:lol where did you go to school growing up? A kid getting expelled for a singular “karate chop” that inflicts no physical harm is something I’ve never heard of.

[Will Hunting]

The kids at that school must have grown up to be giant fucking snowflakes :lol

[Spurtacular]

:lol where did you go to school growing up? A kid getting expelled for a singular “karate chop” that inflicts no physical harm is something I’ve never heard of.

You're adding parameters I never said were there. In most cases, elementary expulsions would be done based on a series of events. But I can imagine there are some zero-tolerance schools out there.

[Pavlov]

You're adding parameters I never said were there. In most cases, elementary expulsions would be done based on a series of events. But I can imagine there are some zero-tolerance schools out there.:lmao immediate moving of the goalpost.

No kid has ever gotten expelled for the kind of thing Acosta did.

[Spurtacular]

No kid has ever gotten expelled for the kind of thing Acosta did.

:lmao Chump trying to say karate chops are not offenses that can lead to expulsion.
:lmao Today's sociopath

[Pavlov]

:lmao Chump trying to say karate chops are not offenses that can lead to expulsion.
:lmao Today's sociopath:lmao Derp still trying to call it a karate chop
:lmao Snowflake Sociopath

[Spurtacular]

:lmao Derp still trying to call it a karate chop
:lmao Snowflake Sociopath

He karate chopped his arm down against hers while repelling her. Correct terminology triggers you.

[Pavlov]

He karate chopped his arm down against hers while repelling her. Correct terminology triggers you.It triggers derisive laughter in everyone who sees you use it, snowflake.

It wasn't a karate chop. No harm was done except to your tender intact hymen.

[pgardn]

He karate chopped his arm down against hers while repelling her. Correct terminology triggers you.

No, it was a roundhouse kick to the head.
Or a heart punch.

[Spurtacular]

It triggers derisive laughter in everyone who sees you use it, snowflake.

It wasn't a karate chop. No harm was done except to your tender intact hymen.

I never said it was a matter of harm or not. I said it was a karate chop that connected. Once again, the correct terminology triggers you.

[Pavlov]

No, it was a roundhouse kick to the head.
Or a heart punch.I couldn't see for all the blood pouring out of her before she dieded.

[Spurtacular]

No, it was a roundhouse kick to the head.
Or a heart punch.

It was forceful contact, correct?

[Pavlov]

I never said it was a matter of harm or not. I said it was a karate chop that connected. Once again, the correct terminology triggers you.:lmao karate chop is not correct.

[Pavlov]

It was forceful contact, correct?So should Acosta be arrested for criminal assault, counselor?

Yes or no.

[Spurtacular]

:lmao karate chop is not correct.

A chop/strike otherwise called a karate chop.

:lmao Triggered sociopath

[Spurtacular]

So should Acosta be arrested for criminal assault, counselor?

Yes or no.

If she presses charges.

[Pavlov]

If she presses charges.No, I'm asking you, derp.

So should Acosta be arrested for criminal assault, counselor?

Yes or no.

[Spurtacular]

Acosta clearly aware the woman is trying to retrieve the microphone.

https://i2-prod.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article13553829.ece/ALTERNATES/s1200/0_A-White-House-staff-member-reaches-for-the-microphone-held-by-CNNs-Jim-Acosta-as-he-questions-US.jpg

Acosta performing a karate chop to retain the microphone.

https://static1.businessinsider.com/image/5be4760b110d4c7e8d502235-2143/acosta2a.jpg

[Pavlov]

Acosta clearly aware the woman is trying to retrieve the microphone.

https://i2-prod.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article13553829.ece/ALTERNATES/s1200/0_A-White-House-staff-member-reaches-for-the-microphone-held-by-CNNs-Jim-Acosta-as-he-questions-US.jpg

Acosta performing a karate chop to retain the microphone.

https://static1.businessinsider.com/image/5be4760b110d4c7e8d502235-2143/acosta2a.jpg

So should Acosta be arrested for criminal assault, counselor?

Yes or no.

[Spurtacular]

So should Acosta be arrested for criminal assault, counselor?

Yes or no.

If she presses charges. This has been answered.

[Spurtacular]

Acosta clearly aware the woman is trying to retrieve the microphone.

https://i2-prod.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article13553829.ece/ALTERNATES/s1200/0_A-White-House-staff-member-reaches-for-the-microphone-held-by-CNNs-Jim-Acosta-as-he-questions-US.jpg

Acosta performing a karate chop to retain the microphone.

https://static1.businessinsider.com/image/5be4760b110d4c7e8d502235-2143/acosta2a.jpg



:lmao Earlier Chump: :cry It's okay cos he said "pardon me" :cry

[boutons_deux]

this all bullshit deflection hiding the fact that Trash blew up, emotionally unstable, stressed when Costa asked a direct question, which Trash refused to answer

y'all's Trash if fucking guilty, the noose is tightening.

[Pavlov]

If she presses charges. This has been answered.She doesn't make the call; the prosecutor does. You know that from Law 100.

So should Acosta be arrested for criminal assault, counselor?

Yes or no.

[Spurtacular]

She doesn't make the call; the prosecutor does. You know that from Law 100.

So should Acosta be arrested for criminal assault, counselor?

Yes or no.

SOP for light assault is to leave it up to the victim as to whether or not she wants to press charges and then proceed accordingly. Given what I know, I would not deviate from SOP.

[Pavlov]

SOP for light assault is to leave it up to the victim as to whether or not she wants to press charges and then proceed accordingly. Given what I know, I would not deviate from SOP.Link to SOP for the jurisdiction in question, derp?

[Spurtacular]

Link to SOP for the jurisdiction in question, derp?

:lmao GALP, dickhead

Generally accepted law practice

[Pavlov]

:lmao GA(L)P, dickheadGenerally accepted accounting principles?

Sociopath Home School Accounting 100

[Pavlov]

:lmao GALP, dickhead

Generally accepted law practice:lmao sociopath edit

[Spurtacular]

Generally accepted accounting principles?

Sociopath Home School Accounting 100

I've seen the standard applied time and time again.

:lmao Sociopath going into the weeds again.

[Spurtacular]

:lmao sociopath edit

No. Edit for clarity.

:lmao Standard sociopath narrative

[Pavlov]

I've seen the standard applied time and time again.

:lmao Sociopath going into the weeds again.Great. Give a link to it.

[Pavlov]

No. Edit for clarity.

:lmao Standard sociopath narrative:lol made up term

[Spurtacular]

Great. Give a link to it.

Weeds, bruh. You asked what I'd do. You got your answer.

[Pavlov]

Weeds, bruh. You asked what I'd do. You got your answer.:lol snowflake cop out.

Do you think she should press charges, counselor?

[Spurtacular]

:lol snowflake cop out.

Do you think she should press charges, counselor?

I've given you my answer. You know what I'd do. Stop throwing a tantrum.

[Pavlov]

I've given you my answer. You know what I'd do. Stop throwing a tantrum.If you were the intern, would you press charges?

[Spurtacular]

If you were the intern, would you press charges?

No. But that doesn't mean that Acosta's actions were not wholly inappropriate (or in violation of the law).

[Pavlov]

No.:rollin:rollin:rollin:rollin:rollin:rollin:roll in

[Spurtacular]

:rollin:rollin:rollin:rollin:rollin:rollin:rollin

Why is that so funny? It doesn't conflict with anything I've said.

:lmao Today's inept sociopath.

[Pavlov]

If you were the intern, would you press charges?
No.:tu :lol

[Spurtacular]

:tu :lol

:lmao Poor inept Chump really wants a W.

[Pavlov]

:lmao Poor inept Chump really wants a W.:lol you're the one who admitted it's a complete nothingburger.

[Spurtacular]

:lol you're the one who admitted it's a complete nothingburger.

I never said that at all.

:lmao Sociopath making illogical leaps.

[Pavlov]

I never said that at all.So what's the big deal since you won't press 100 Law charges?

[Spurtacular]

So what's the big deal since you won't press 100 Law charges?

He broke the law; but not all offenders are prosecuted. Have you taken an introductory law course?

[Pavlov]

He broke the lawBut you wouldn't even press charges if you were the alleged victim.

:lmao

[Spurtacular]

But you wouldn't even press charges if you were the alleged victim.

:lmao

Just because you're a victim doesn't mean you have to be vindictive. Is that how you always do it?

[Pavlov]

Just because you're a victim doesn't mean you have to be vindictive. Is that how you always do it?Hey, you just admitted it's not worth the trouble. IOW nothingburger.

lol

[Spurtacular]

Hey, you just admitted it's not worth the trouble. IOW nothingburger.

lol

No. It's still a serious offense worthy of suspension and possible termination by his employer. But CNN is instead exemplifying that physical force against women is an acceptable practice even as they MePoo it up like utter hypocrites. :lmao

[Chris]

At least Trump didn't fetch the Secret Service on Jim like Obama.

1060954794498637824

[pgardn]

It was forceful contact, correct?

oh hell yes, forceful.

It resulted in a compound fracture. Correct?

Look, she initiated the assault and tried to grab his penis, he resisted by trying to push off and get away... by your standards turning blue.

[Winehole23]

At least Trump didn't fetch the Secret Service on Jim like Obama.

1060954794498637824http://www.indianapolisrecorder.com/news/features/article_52bcb103-5268-5643-9e28-14a4b5633721.html

[Winehole23]

looks like Secret Service acted well before Obama arrived.

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2009/05/how_not_to_give_obama_a_letter.html (https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2009/05/how_not_to_give_obama_a_letter.html)

[pgardn]

Winehole helping the inept red team.

#research for Spurter and Chris.
And omg, Obama was after the evil press as well, let's just get rid of them. They have tried to assault two presidents, one with a letter, one thru a woman in red who works for Trump. Evil press...

[Pavlov]

At least Trump didn't fetch the Secret Service on Jim like Obama.

1060954794498637824lol Chris spreading outright lies in a feeble attempt at whataboutism.

[Chucho]

Hey, a post about me.


...and the other side of the coin is your post about them.

Shame on you for not disclosing that to them.

[Spurtacular]

oh hell yes, forceful.

It resulted in a compound fracture. Correct?

Look, she initiated the assault and tried to grab his penis, he resisted by trying to push off and get away... by your standards turning blue.

He physically engaged her to produce a result. If you can't acknowledge simple truths, that's on you, dude.

[pgardn]

He physically engaged her to produce a result. If you can't acknowledge simple truths, that's on you, dude.

She physically made the first move, Deuteronomy.
If you can't see this you are blind and a liar.

[Spurtacular]

She physically made the first move, Deuteronomy.
If you can't see this you are blind and a liar.

She did her job of attempting to retrieve the microphone. Acosta knew this and was combative nonetheless.

[LkrFan]

We knew this was coming 1062352904793800704

[LkrFan]

1062352634995269632

[LkrFan]

1062350626389020673
:corn:

[Spurs Homer]

1062352634995269632


This is actually a win for the criminal traitor -

because now CNN will talk about this 24/7 and ignore the incoming Mueller indictments and other ongoing corruption.

Instead CNN should ask ALL news outlets to STOP attending the lying shitshows to the American people - period.
Just report what is happening but stop asking Sarah Slanders any questions - just so she can spin and lie to the public and distort the criminal traitors agenda.

[Winehole23]

WH changes its tune:



Close

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dr5NQv1V4AIiaWD.jpg:large

[The Closer]

But he karate chopped da fuck out of that intern into the next millennia. :lol

[RandomGuy]

http://www.indianapolisrecorder.com/news/features/article_52bcb103-5268-5643-9e28-14a4b5633721.html


"Roman Catholic priestess"

So she attempted to force her way through a security detail to hand the president something.

The incident occurred about 10 minutes before Obama arrived at Los Angeles International Airport by helicopter to board Air Force One. He had been in Los Angeles to attend a Democratic National Committee fundraiser in Beverly Hills on Wednesday.

Lee said later in a telephone interview with The Associated Press that she wanted to hand Obama a letter urging him "to take a stand for traditional marriage."

She said she asked a Secret Service agent to give the president her letter, but he refused and referred her to a White House staffer. Lee said she refused to give the staffer the letter.

"I said, 'I'll take my chances if (the president) comes by here,'" said Lee. "He became annoyed that I wouldn't give him the letter."

Lee said she protested when she was asked to leave.

"I said, 'Why are you bothering me?' They escorted me outside the gate," she said. She said security officers allowed her to return when she promised she would not yell or wave, but then other officers arrived and told her to leave.

Not the same, not even the slightest.

Stupid mother fuckers. smh

[pgardn]

She did her job of attempting to retrieve the microphone. Acosta knew this and was combative nonetheless.

Her job was to grab and claw at him?

You like this crap shoved back at you derp?

[Spurtacular]

Her job was to grab and claw at him?

You like this crap shoved back at you derp?

She went for the microphone; he was aware of it; and he refused and even physically fended her off to keep said microphone. You're pathetic. If you made your scientific observations this sloppily you'd be out of a job.

[pgardn]

She went for the microphone; he was aware of it; and he refused and even physically fended her off to keep said microphone. You're pathetic. If you made your scientific observations this sloppily you'd be out of a job.

She moved on him in a physical manner.
You like your shit shoved back at you?

Acosta was making a frkn pest of himself. He needed to allow others to move on with questions. You want to make it into an assault. That’s just plain stupid. Keep going.

[Spurtacular]

She moved on him in a physical manner.
You like your shit shoved back at you?

Acosta was making a frkn pest of himself. He needed to allow others to move on with questions. You want to make it into an assault. That’s just plain stupid. Keep going.

It's her fucking job to get the mic. It's his responsibility to relinquish the microphone. He did not do that; and instead he pretended that he was the most important person in the room (which is what he always does).

And watch the full fucking clip. You'll see that she announces her presence with a first reach while making no contact with him or the microphone. He is aware of her presence. All subsequent physical contact is initiated by him.

That was the time to follow decorum and hand over the microphone. He didn't. He instead followed his narcissism and continued. Stop being a desperate twat just because you don't like that Acosta engaged in inappropriate handling of the woman and just b/c you perceive that it affects your politics.

[Winehole23]

Derptacular lecturing about decorum is a bit rich...

[pgardn]

It's her fucking job to get the mic. It's his responsibility to relinquish the microphone. He did not do that; and instead he pretended that he was the most important person in the room (which is what he always does).

And watch the full fucking clip. You'll see that she announces her presence with a first reach while making no contact with him or the microphone. He is aware of her presence. All subsequent physical contact is initiated by him.

That was the time to follow decorum and hand over the microphone. He didn't. He instead followed his narcissism and continued. Stop being a desperate twat just because you don't like that Acosta engaged in inappropriate handling of the woman and just b/c you perceive that it affects your politics.

Karate chop....
You watch the clip you pussified twerp.
Karate chop.
when you fall claim gravity assaulted you. Go with that.

[Spurtacular]

Karate chop....
You watch the clip you pussified twerp.
Karate chop.
when you fall claim gravity assaulted you. Go with that.

We can debate the severity of the blow. It was enough to stun her and stop her from doing her job. The bottom line is that Acosta physically handled the woman very inappropriately, and you're sitting there trying to justify it and even make Acosta into a victim. That's just sad.

[Spurtacular]

Derptacular lecturing about decorum is a bit rich...

White House behavior standards and forum etiquette....same shit really.

Great point, bruh. :clap

HOF stuff.

[Winehole23]

There's no rule against reporters being pesky or dickish. Not even unwritten ones.

You're just making shit up, standing on top of the pile, and braying like a jackass.

As usual.

[Spurtacular]

There's no rule against reporters being pesky or dickish. Not even unwritten ones.

You're just making shit up, standing on top of the pile, and braying like a jackass.

As usual.

No rules, huh? Cool. Trump banning Acosta shouldn't be a problem for you, then.

[pgardn]

We can debate the severity of the blow. It was enough to stun her and stop her from doing her job. The bottom line is that Acosta physically handled the woman very inappropriately, and you're sitting there trying to justify it and even make Acosta into a victim. That's just sad.


The severity of the blow?

You got beat up in middle school and high school.

[pgardn]

No rules, huh? Cool. Trump banning Acosta shouldn't be a problem for you, then.


The way Trump has completely ignored truth has allowed reporters like Acosta to flourish in their righteous indignation.
And they also get away with violent karate chops.

[Spurtacular]

The severity of the blow?

You got beat up in middle school and high school.

Whatever you got to tell yourself to support Acosta's physical handling of women, bruh.

[Spurtacular]

The way Trump has completely ignored truth has allowed reporters like Acosta to flourish in their righteous indignation.
And they also get away with violent karate chops.

Accosta is a regular crusader. Such valiance at the end of the day.

:lol wanker

[Winehole23]

No rules, huh? Cool. Trump banning Acosta shouldn't be a problem for you, then.no, but it might be a problem for Trump.

There's a Nixon-era precedent relating to a reporter from The Nation who got 86ed.

[spurraider21]

Been fun watching him play it up as flat out murder.
Also light rain is basically a biological weapon.

[Chucho]

no, but it might be a problem for Trump.

There's a Nixon-era precedent relating to a reporter from The Nation who got 86ed.



That's going to sail far-right of the goalpost known as derp's brain.

[clambake]

fox news is standing with acosta, lol.

[benefactor]

fox news is standing with acosta, lol.
lol...where is your God now?

[Spurminator]

fox news is standing with acosta, lol.

No wonder Donnie's been holed up in the White House eating cheeseburgers, he lost the most important people in his life. Hope he's on suicide watch.

[boutons_deux]

fox news is standing with acosta, lol.

.... joined the lawsuit with other news orgs.

[johnsmith]

Every where I look, this is the subject matter....a dickhead reporter and a dickhead president and everyone arguing over who’s more wrong.....Boutons is right, his country is fucked and we’re dumber for debating this with the passion it’s being debated with.

[boutons_deux]

Trash is nothing but bullshit, deflecting noise, relatively harmless, ineffective, a FAILING one-term DISASTER of a Pres, compared to the long-lasting damage his Cabinet and Repug Congress have been, are doing

[Spurs Homer]

Every where I look, this is the subject matter....a dickhead reporter and a dickhead president and everyone arguing over who’s more wrong.....Boutons is right, his country is fucked and we’re dumber for debating this with the passion it’s being debated with.

Some people can stretch and make it a constitutional argument - but I almost have to agree with you.
No one forced Trump to call on Acosta for a question - but he was looking for a fight - for a distraction.

No one force Acosta to push the issue and try to go to war with Trump - bu he was also just as stubborn as Trump is stupid.

Almost a non-issue - but people do have a point if they feel that their rights are being tested/violated.

I'd just as soon move on tbh.

[Spurtacular]

no, but it might be a problem for Trump.

There's a Nixon-era precedent relating to a reporter from The Nation who got 86ed.

Trump doesn't give a shit about your phony precedents.

[Winehole23]

A court will decide regardless of what you call it.

[boutons_deux]

Can CNN beat the White House in court? Look to the case 40 years ago of a loner journalist named Robert Sherrill.

In the 1977 case, the court found that denial of White House credentials was a sufficiently grave infringement on the freedom of the press that it couldn’t just be done by fiat.

It required, at the very least, “notice of the factual bases for denial, an opportunity for the applicant to respond” and

“a final written statement of the reasons for denial.”

Notably, the court prohibited “content-based criteria for press pass issuance.”

The critical finding, according to Mark H. Lynch of Covington & Burling, who argued the case before the D.C. Circuit, was this:

Given the

“important First Amendment rights implicated by refusal to grant White House press passes to bona fide Washington journalists,” as the court held,

“such refusal must be based on a compelling governmental interest.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2018/11/14/can-cnn-beat-white-house-court-look-case-years-ago-loner-journalist-named-robert-sherrill/?utm_term=.1ee48e1d6c12

But how many years will it take for Trash to FAIL AGAIN as wannabe dictator?

[CosmicCowboy]

A court will decide regardless of what you call it.

[Reck]

Trump taking another L.

Has to give Acosta his press pass back ASAP. :lol derp

[benefactor]

:lol

[Winehole23]

Trump wasted a challenge on a bad case. The press is stronger than it was before.

[djohn2oo8]

1063456744540643330

[hater]

Sadly for democrats they dont realize having Acosta in the white house actually helps for Trumps reelection :lol

[Spurs Homer]

:lol:lol:lol

[The Closer]

Sadly for democrats they dont realize having Acosta in the white house actually helps for Trumps reelection :lol

That's how we go the house. Not fighting back. :lmao

[The Closer]

:lmao

[hater]

Acosta back means sure Trump reelection. Few people rally his base as much as him :lol

[clambake]

Acosta back means sure Trump reelection. Few people rally his base as much as him :lol

of course. thats why fox joined in.

[Spurs Homer]

Acosta back means sure Trump reelection. Few people rally his base as much as him :lol

haha -except -

The Cult has been rallied a million times - and the result was -

The BLUE wave!


:lmao:lmao:lmao

The days of shivering in fear of a bunch of brainwashed cult-tards like TSA/Ducks/Chris et al -
"rallying" are over.

[LkrFan]

1063466223147585536
:lol

[LkrFan]

1063460538070589440
:tu

[Winehole23]

RIP WIlliam Goldman:

837509250779918340

[hater]

of course. thats why fox joined in.

Fox is very much pro establishment. They do cater to Trumps base as well. Play both sides

[hater]

LOL blue wave

You mean the little drip right?

I see bigger waves in my bathtub :lol

[benefactor]

1063456744540643330
:lmao

[Reck]

Sadly for democrats they dont realize having Acosta in the white house actually helps for Trumps reelection :lol

How so?

[Spurs Homer]

LOL blue wave

You mean the little drip right?

I see bigger waves in my bathtub :lol

enough to have;

subpoena power
investigative power


the days of unchecked fuckery & corruption are ending.

and- this was WITH a rallied base of cult racists!
rofl

[Pavlov]

LOL blue wave

You mean the little drip right?

I see bigger waves in my bathtub :lol
1063422578386264065

:lol hater

[hater]

enough to have;

subpoena power
investigative power


the days of unchecked fuckery & corruption are ending.

and- this was WITH a rallied base of cult racists!
rofl

:lmao BouttocksTrois :lol

[CosmicCowboy]

It will be hilarious if they give him his pass back but never call on him again.

[hater]

It will be hilarious if they give him his pass back but never call on him again.

What do you mean “if”?

:lol

[Pavlov]

Impossible. Trump and Sanders would never pass up an opportunity for drama.

[djohn2oo8]

It will be hilarious if they give him his pass back but never call on him again.
What’s hilarious is Trump getting dick whipped by his own appointees

[djohn2oo8]

1063455324806529024

[CitizenDwayne]

It will be hilarious if they give him his pass back but never call on him again.
Most likely outcome. Don’t know why they just didn’t do that in the first place

[djohn2oo8]

Most likely outcome. Don’t know why they just didn’t do that in the first place
Other reporters might just yield their time to Acosta lol

[RandomGuy]

Acosta back means sure Trump reelection. Few people rally his base as much as him :lol

:rofl

Jesus dude, lay off the sauce.

[RandomGuy]

LOL blue wave

You mean the little drip right?

I see bigger waves in my bathtub :lol

Thrity-eight point swing, despite gerrymandering in the house, and over 300 flipped state seats in state legislatures... yeah.

You are a fucking idiot. What will do you do for your next trick? Flat-earth?

[CitizenDwayne]

Most trump voters do not know the name Jim Acosta. No one will be rallied due to him having a fucking press pass

[Splits]

Thrity-eight point swing, despite gerrymandering in the house, and over 300 flipped state seats in state legislatures... yeah.

You are a fucking idiot. What will do you do for your next trick? Flat-earth?

:lol

[boutons_deux]

Thrity-eight point swing, despite gerrymandering in the house, and over 300 flipped state seats in state legislatures... yeah.

You are a fucking idiot. What will do you do for your next trick? Flat-earth?

Governors flipped

https://www.vox.com/2018/11/6/18070682/democrat-governor-wins

State attorneys general flipped

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-11-07/emboldened-democratic-ags-gird-for-more-trump-resistance

Trash said the election (and everything else) was All About Him, and America said "G F Y"

[Blake]

Lol Acosta In!

Lol Trump

[Spurtacular]

Lol Acosta In!

Lol Trump

:lol Cuck been on the edge of his seat waiting for this to happen.

[Reck]

14 pages on a bust. Derp

[Pavlov]

:lmao


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nxeaz4uX73s:lmao

[Spurtacular]

:lmao

:lmao MePooer chumpettes excusing the manhandling of a woman in the workplace.
:lmao The L

[Pavlov]

:lmao MePooer chumpettes excusing the manhandling of a woman in the workplace.
:lmao The L:lmao derp still clinging to his traumatic karate assault lie.
:lmao the only L is Trump's L in court at the hands of his own judge.

lol derp

[koriwhat]

the few here who advocate for acosta are bitches who probably label themselves male-feminists. they know damn well how acosta acts and how he tries to take over all the pressers yet here are the bitches propping him up. bunch of fucking losers who know acosta was in the wrong but because they hate djt, for no other reason than MSM telling them to hate him, they choose to dismiss acosta's behavior.

[Pavlov]

the few here who advocate for acosta are bitches who probably label themselves male-feminists. they know damn well how acosta acts and how he tries to take over all the pressers yet here are the bitches propping him up. bunch of fucking losers who know acosta was in the wrong but because they hate djt, for no other reason than MSM telling them to hate him, they choose to dismiss acosta's behavior.You hate Acosta because you love Trump and Trump told you to hate him.

[koriwhat]

You hate Acosta because you love Trump and Trump told you to hate him.

nah, i hate acosta because just like you yall are both smug bitches.

[Spurtacular]

:lmao derp still clinging to his traumatic karate assault lie.
:lmao the only L is Trump's L in court at the hands of his own judge.

lol derp

Physically handling a woman against her will good now.

:lmao Chumpettes

[Pavlov]

Physically handling a woman against her will good now.

:lmao Chumpettes:lol lying derp

[Spurtacular]

You hate Acosta because you love Trump and Trump told you to hate him.

Sociopath truth

[Spurtacular]

:lol lying derp

:lmao Physically handling a woman against her will good now.

[Pavlov]

nah, i hate acosta because just like you yall are both smug bitches.Sorry, you're more smug than anyone here because you took LSD.

That's just stupid.

[koriwhat]

Sorry, you're more smug than anyone here because you took LSD.

That's just stupid.

oh no i took lsd... nah, i took a ton of lsd! get it right pussy!

timothy leary was leaps and bounds ahead of you in this world but i guess he was stupid too. hoffman, the scientist, synthesized lsd but i guess he was stupid as well.

you're just a pussy man. it's reality and sorry there's pussy men like you in this world. we need to breed yall sissy fucks out of existence!

[Pavlov]

oh no i took lsd... nah, i took a ton of lsd! get it right pussy!

timothy leary was leaps and bounds ahead of you in this world but i guess he was stupid too. hoffman, the scientist, synthesized lsd but i guess he was stupid as well.

you're just a pussy man. it's reality and sorry there's pussy men like you in this world. we need to breed yall sissy fucks out of existence!You need a girlfriend to do that tbh.

[koriwhat]

You need a girlfriend to do that tbh.

oooh burn... actually you don't need a girlfriend nor a wife. don't you know how biology works or are you on the spectrum? lmao i bet you are you fucking pussy of "man".

[Pavlov]

oooh burn... actually you don't need a girlfriend nor a wife. don't you know how biology works or are you on the spectrum? lmao i bet you are you fucking pussy of "man".OK, what are you going to use in your own breeding, kori?

[Blake]

derp

[koriwhat]

funny how blake keeps calling others derp while he's a real life cuck. how fucking ironic of a sissy to be calling others insults.

[djohn2oo8]

At least Acosta probably doesn’t have calf tats.

[Blake]

funny how blake keeps calling others derp while he's a real life cuck. how fucking ironic of a sissy to be calling others insults.

That's funny, druggy.

[The Closer]

At least Acosta probably doesn’t have calf tats.

:lol

[hater]

Called this shit :tu

Weeklystandard


Acosta Gets His Press Pass Back, But Trump Is the Real Winner

Let’s be honest: The administration loves having CNN’s White House reporter in the spotlight.

Why? Because the White House loves it when Acosta is in the spotlight. He’s the perfect foil to Trump, the perfect face for the administration’s constant campaign against the “fake news media.” Acosta’s tedious furrowed-brow posturing and spotlight-hogging and his fixation on Trump’s meanness to the press are all catnip to a president who loves nothing more than to tell his fans that that’s what journalists are all about. Any time Acosta asks Trump a question, Trump gets to make a choice: Do I stay on whatever thorny subject I’m being asked about, or do I pivot to “Trump calls Jim Acosta names”? This president opts for the latter every time.

So congratulations to Jim Acosta for reclaiming his rightful place in the White House briefing room. The celebrity death match nobody asked for will now proceed.

[Blake]

Called this shit :tu

Weeklystandard


Acosta Gets His Press Pass Back, But Trump Is the Real Winner

Let’s be honest: The administration loves having CNN’s White House reporter in the spotlight.

Why? Because the White House loves it when Acosta is in the spotlight. He’s the perfect foil to Trump, the perfect face for the administration’s constant campaign against the “fake news media.” Acosta’s tedious furrowed-brow posturing and spotlight-hogging and his fixation on Trump’s meanness to the press are all catnip to a president who loves nothing more than to tell his fans that that’s what journalists are all about. Any time Acosta asks Trump a question, Trump gets to make a choice: Do I stay on whatever thorny subject I’m being asked about, or do I pivot to “Trump calls Jim Acosta names”? This president opts for the latter every time.

So congratulations to Jim Acosta for reclaiming his rightful place in the White House briefing room. The celebrity death match nobody asked for will now proceed.

Lol Weekly Standard

[Spurtacular]

Lol Weekly Standard

You do realize it was you, not her, right?

[koriwhat]

At least Acosta probably doesn’t have calf tats.

yeah but he's a faggot just like you though.

[Blake]

You do realize it was you, not her, right?

You can talk about me in your devotional thread.

[Spurtacular]

You can talk about me in your devotional thread.

You do realize it was you and not her, right?

Yes or no.

[Blake]

derrrrp

[Spurtacular]

:lol Cuck crawling to his corner.

[Chris]

1064559215191179264

:lmao

[Blake]

1064559215191179264

:lmao

Lol Sara Carter.

At this point the WH hasn't made a decision yet.

You and Carter are buffoons.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/19/media/cnn-acosta-emergency-hearing/index.html

[Reck]

Trump and the WH are addicted to losing at this point.

This will only make the judge's order for Acosta's pass to be reinstated even more valid and re-enforces the fact Trump is actively trying to violate the guy's first and fifth ammendment rights.

Only an idiot like Chris can laugh about something that will ultimately be a loss cause for Trump.

[DMC]

Trump and the WH are addicted to losing at this point.

This will only make the judge's order for Acosta's pass to be reinstated even more valid and re-enforces the fact Trump is actively trying to violate the guy's first and fifth ammendment rights.

Only an idiot like Chris can laugh about something that will ultimately be a loss cause for Trump.

It was only reinstated for due process. The judge did not rule on the First Amendment aspect as far as I know. After due process they can suspend it again and the trial will have to start again.

[Reck]

It was only reinstated for due process. The judge did not rule on the First Amendment aspect as far as I know. After due process they can suspend it again and the trial will have to start again.

The case is not even over yet. The judge ordered the WH to reinstate his pass while they continue with the case.

I would imagine the WH already threatening to suspend his credentials again will not play well with this judge and case going forward.

[Spurs Homer]

WH backs down lol


again

[Blake]

1064559215191179264

:lmao

:lmao :lmao :lmao

[Reck]

I would imagine the WH already threatening to suspend his credentials again will not play well with this judge and case going forward.

https://twitter.com/renato_mariotti/status/1064619285954338816

:lol The people working at the White house. It's like a bunch of Chrises and Hater in there.

[Winehole23]

1064630791865434112

[boutons_deux]

Trash realizes he's too fucking stupid and ignorant to spar with journalists.

Trash's fighting the journalists doesn't hide his incompetence, dicklessness

"big water" around Puerto Rico

"rake" the forests

etc, etc

[benefactor]

What a bunch of pussies

[Chris]

Jim should run if he wants to debate.

[Pavlov]

Jim should run if he wants to debate.He just wants to ask follow up questions along with the rest of the press corps.

[Chris]

He just wants to ask follow up questions along with the rest of the press corps.

No, he wanted to argue about the caravan and interrupt POTUS. He's a professional agitator as opposed to an amateur agitator ie: you.

[Pavlov]

No, he wanted to argue about the caravan and interrupt POTUS. He's a professional agitator as opposed to an amateur agitator ie: you.:lol stolen buzzwords.

He's a reporter.

Trump is a snowflake.

As are you.

[Reck]

No, he wanted to argue about the caravan and interrupt POTUS. He's a professional agitator as opposed to an amateur agitator ie: you.

All valid points of discussion. Or did you forget Trump harped on the evil caravan full of kids and women more than 100 times. How many times has be brought the caravan up since the midterm, Chris?

[Chris]

All valid points of discussion. Or did you forget Trump harped on the evil caravan full of kids and women more than 100 times. How many times has be brought the caravan up since the midterm, Chris?

Doesn't matter how many times he brought it up, he's POTUS. Valid points of discussion during a debate. If Jim just wanted to ask follow up questions then he should stfu and let POTUS answer and then ask his follow up questions. Jim had to make it a live editorial, the only way people can watch news now apparently. Everything has to be an op-ed.

[Reck]

Doesn't matter how many times he brought it up, he's POTUS. Valid points of discussion during a debate. If Jim just wanted to ask follow up questions then he should stfu and let POTUS answer and then ask his follow up questions. Jim had to make it a live editorial, the only way people can watch news now apparently. Everything has to be an op-ed.

He tried before Trump acted like a little bitch.

:lol Pacing around like an addict missing his fix.

[hater]

1064630791865434112

:lmao

Beter to not answer than answer with lies tbqh

[Chris]

1064681660900405248

[Chris]

1064706055618334721

Thanks Jim :lol

[Pavlov]

:lmao snowflake Trump has to ban reporters to avoid tough questions.

[ElNono]

Byron York is the chief political correspondent for the Washington Examiner, a Fox News contributor and the author of The Vast Left Wing Conspiracy.

You can tell he's no lawyer, lol

[Blake]

1064559215191179264

:lmao

:lmao :lmao :lmao

[Winehole23]

:lmao

Beter to not answer than answer with lies tbqhbetter for whom?

so lazy!

[LkrFan]

Jim Acosta is back on the beat:
1067519560415420417

[Spurtacular]

:lmao snowflake Trump has to ban reporters to avoid tough questions.

:cry Fuck #MePoo

:lmao Sociopath Chump