Official Dems are doing AWESOME page

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/jerome_corsi/status/1137525091997233152

[Pavlov]

https://twitter.com/jerome_corsi/status/1137525091997233152:lmao permanent butthurt

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/realDailyWire/status/1138139924140445697

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/RealMAGASteve/status/1137951810331660288

I think I found Reck.

[Pavlov]

https://twitter.com/realDailyWire/status/1138139924140445697That tweet was paid for?:lol

[Chucho]

Chris is now on par with Boots for absolutely worthless spam. Might be worse because he posts substanceless tweets.

[Reck]

https://twitter.com/RealMAGASteve/status/1137951810331660288

I think I found Reck (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=14412).

Me thinks derp has infected you with his homosexuality.

:lol Chris also thinking about random men while browsing online.

[Chris]

Me thinks derp has infected you with his homosexuality.

:lol Chris also thinking about random men while browsing online.

You mentioned me just yesterday in the tech forum you homo. At least I have the stones to @ your dumb ass :lol

[Pavlov]

You mentioned me just yesterday in the tech forum you homo. At least I have the stones to @ your dumb ass :lolDidn't you tell him to not @ you multiple times?

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1138197444745994240

[Pavlov]

https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1138197444745994240Twitter, you say?

Wow!

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/FaithGoldy/status/1138228084723855360

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1138224329777221632

[Pavlov]

:lol Qhrisbot posts 20 tweets in a row.

Wonders why he is cited for bot-like behavior.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/Patrici15767099/status/1138285653307809792

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1138464656446631942

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/RyanAFournier/status/1142978139435483136

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/larryelder/status/1142880486831771648

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1143226300242337792

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/gatewaypundit/status/1143242391933071360

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1143644470526664704

[Chris]

The homeless population in Burbank, CA (Adam Schiff's district) has jumped 40% this year alone :tu

[Pavlov]

The homeless population in Burbank, CA (Adam Schiff's district) has jumped 40% this year alone :tuGiving a thumbs up to homelessness.

You're a real piece of shit.:tu

[koriwhat]

The homeless population in Burbank, CA (Adam Schiff's district) has jumped 40% this year alone :tu

I believe it... oh and fuck pav :tu

[Chucho]

The homeless population in Burbank, CA (Adam Schiff's district) has jumped 40% this year alone :tu

The massive failure that is California is the biggest thing not reported in the media, to be perfectly honest.

[Chucho]

You have to go back to medieval England or the Roman Empire to find a land so rich with no inclination to care about the poor or have any plan to address the issue.

Money has been spent apparently, with zero accounting of said monies, and the problem is worsening every day.

California politicians do not care about the domestic poor. They dont and their shoddy tackling of the problem and inability to give direct and clear solutions to the problem is proof positive they dont.

Their shameful pimping of Hispanic peoples who arent citizens is disgusting and deplorable considering how few shits they care about their own.

Tammany Hall 2.0 is the most accurate comparison of their poverty pimping and corruption. Trump couldnt pull off the shit these scumbags pull off with the full cooperation of the Russian Government and all of the 20k suspected neo Nazis in this country.

Fuck the victims of this state's agenda to eliminate the middle and working class, their pure corruption (being so painfully obvious in bed with PGE is more than any state government could sweep under the rug, throw in the water misappropriation, the billions wasted in a train to nowhere and ten years of annual raises with no citizen input) and it becomes real sickening living through this shitshow of corruption and thievery.

For shitheads like RG and other cocksuckers who eat det Leftists jizz, who dont care about people but get their chubbies lying they are morally superior defend this crime syndictate because det surplus and det GDP, that the state politicians arent using to benefit anyone or anything than themselves and their reputation.

Fuck this state. There's no moral superiority backing such a criminally-ept organization like California's Democrats.

[ElNono]

You have to go back to medieval England or the Roman Empire to find a land so rich with no inclination to care about the poor or have any plan to address the issue.

Money has been spent apparently, with zero accounting of said monies, and the problem is worsening every day.

California politicians do not care about the domestic poor. They dont and their shoddy tackling of the problem and inability to give direct and clear solutions to the problem is proof positive they dont.

Their shameful pimping of Hispanic peoples who arent citizens is disgusting and deplorable considering how few shits they care about their own.

Tammany Hall 2.0 is the most accurate comparison of their poverty pimping and corruption. Trump couldnt pull off the shit these scumbags pull off with the full cooperation of the Russian Government and all of the 20k suspected neo Nazis in this country.

Fuck the victims of this state's agenda to eliminate the middle and working class, their pure corruption (being so painfully obvious in bed with PGE is more than any state government could sweep under the rug, throw in the water misappropriation, the billions wasted in a train to nowhere and ten years of annual raises with no citizen input) and it becomes real sickening living through this shitshow of corruption and thievery.

For shitheads like RG and other cocksuckers who eat det Leftists jizz, who dont care about people but get their chubbies lying they are morally superior defend this crime syndictate because det surplus and det GDP, that the state politicians arent using to benefit anyone or anything than themselves and their reputation.

Fuck this state. There's no moral superiority backing such a criminally-ept organization like California's Democrats.

Honestly, housing availability and pricing is key. New York has even more homeless per capita, and unsurprisingly has the same house pricing problems. Exorbitant demand, both rent and housing, and not enough construction.

I'm not familiar enough with the local politics to have an informed opinion about it, so I'll take your word for it. But, this particular issue is extremely common in big metropolis. It's normally driven by an influx of extremely well paid talent that displaces the old population, and there's also the fortune seekers that are allured by the prospect of making it in the big city.

[Pavlov]

It is kind of stupid.

OH, AT LEAST HOUSING IS CHEAP ENOUGH IN MISSISSIPPI THAT THOSE POOR FUCKS CAN LIVE IN A SHACK.

[Ball Buster]

The homeless population in Burbank, CA (Adam Schiff's district) has jumped 40% this year alone :tu

Burbank is a conservative town with its own police force. Nearly all the schools there are catholic.

Fun fact, black people unofficially were not allowed in the city after sundown until the 1970’s. They’d be escorted out of town by local PD.

[TeyshaBlue]

Burbank is a conservative town with its own police force. Nearly all the schools there are catholic.

Fun fact, black people unofficially were not allowed in the city after sundown until the 1970’s. They’d be escorted out of town by local PD.

We had a blackout last night. But, the police made him get back in his car and leave......Emo Phillips.

[Ball Buster]

We had a blackout last night. But, the police made him get back in his car and leave......Emo Phillips.

:lol

[koriwhat]

Honestly, housing availability and pricing is key. New York has even more homeless per capita, and unsurprisingly has the same house pricing problems. Exorbitant demand, both rent and housing, and not enough construction.

I'm not familiar enough with the local politics to have an informed opinion about it, so I'll take your word for it. But, this particular issue is extremely common in big metropolis. It's normally driven by an influx of extremely well paid talent that displaces the old population, and there's also the fortune seekers that are allured by the prospect of making it in the big city.

liberal state

[ElNono]

liberal state

If it would be so easy, tbh... plenty of liberal states that have less homeless per capita than conservative states (ie: Tennessee has more than New Jersey, Texas has more than Michigan).

Perhaps the closest indicator is the major economic activity in the area, especially digital economy and financial services.

You have a large tech hub on the Pacific Northwest (Oregon/Washington) with Microsoft, Amazon, etc. Silicon Valley in California. Wall Street in NY. Those are the areas with the biggest impact.

And states like California are not small, but the phenomenon is largely tilted mostly on the big cities and surrounding areas. These are areas that shifted to a services/knowledge economy, displaced a good amount of people in favor of importing talent.

[ElNono]

dp

[spurraider21]

dp
bend over, i'll show you dp

[pgardn]

If it would be so easy, tbh... plenty of liberal states that have less homeless per capita than conservative states (ie: Tennessee has more than New Jersey, Texas has more than Michigan).

Perhaps the closest indicator is the major economic activity in the area, especially digital economy and financial services.

You have a large tech hub on the Pacific Northwest (Oregon/Washington) with Microsoft, Amazon, etc. Silicon Valley in California. Wall Street in NY. Those are the areas with the biggest impact.

And states like California are not small, but the phenomenon is largely tilted mostly on the big cities and surrounding areas. These are areas that shifted to a services/knowledge economy, displaced a good amount of people in favor of importing talent.

You cant expect him to understand a grain of the above.
I salute you for spending time on people who choose ignorance.

[Chris]

And states like California are not small.

No kidding? I thought California was one of the smaller states. Good stuff

[Chris]

Mixing in your own shit with copypasta isn't a good idea unless you proofread it a few times. That's why I stick to posting facts and leave the plagiarizing and prognosticating to you yahoos.

[Pavlov]

Mixing in your own shit with copypasta isn't a good idea unless you proofread it a few times. That's why I stick to posting facts and leave the plagiarizing and prognosticating to you yahoos.Right you post fake news and keep posting fake news and never stop posting fake news because you're a brainless sheep who simply follows orders no matter how stupid it makes you look.

[Winehole23]

Records unsealed, Jeffrey Epstein arrested on new sex trafficking charges. Let the chips fall.

1147693258375454720

[Winehole23]

https://amp.miamiherald.com/news/state/florida/article232374872.html#click=https://t.co/jGI3JAAsVX

https://t.co/QGDETNw7sZ?amp=1

[Winehole23]

1147719674492100608

[Winehole23]

The case is being handled by the Public Corruption Unit of the Southern District of New York, with assistance from the district's human-trafficking officials and the FBI.https://www.thedailybeast.com/jeffrey-epstein-arrested-for-sex-trafficking-of-minors-source

[Pavlov]

Props to the Miami Herald for keeping this swamp nightmare in the news.

[Chris]

Epstein has more ties to Clinton than Trump so the friend monikor sticks for the former. An acquaintance for the latter I'd venture.

[Chris]

Who reads the Daily Beast?

[Pavlov]

Epstein has more ties to Clinton than Trump so the friend monikor sticks for the former. An acquaintance for the latter I'd venture.Why would you venture that?

[Pavlov]

Who reads the Daily Beast?You read Qanon.

[Spurtacular]

Why would you venture that?

Twenty questions chump present.

[Pavlov]

Epstein has more ties to Clinton than Trump so the friend monikor sticks for the former. An acquaintance for the latter I'd venture."I’ve known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy. He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it – Jeffrey enjoys his social life."

--Donald J. Trump, 2002

[ElNono]

No kidding? I thought California was one of the smaller states. Good stuff

Wouldn't be surprising you thought that if Ryan Saavedra told you to think that.


Mixing in your own shit with copypasta isn't a good idea unless you proofread it a few times. That's why I stick to posting facts and leave the plagiarizing and prognosticating to you yahoos.

Are you talking to me? What's the copypasta?

[pgardn]

Mixing in your own shit with copypasta isn't a good idea unless you proofread it a few times. That's why I stick to posting facts and leave the plagiarizing and prognosticating to you yahoos.

Chris posts facts from his inside tweet sources and then disowns them after they are incinerated.
Clown.

Alternative Fact:

Yes now means NO.

Good Christian boy Chrissy.

[TSA]

https://amp.miamiherald.com/news/state/florida/article232374872.html#click=https://t.co/jGI3JAAsVX

https://t.co/QGDETNw7sZ?amp=1

https://threader.app/thread/1147660978030616581

[TSA]

Epstein has more ties to Clinton than Trump so the friend monikor sticks for the former. An acquaintance for the latter I'd venture.

Former President Bill Clinton took a romantic jaunt in 2002 to convicted pedophile pal Jeffrey Epstein’s “orgy island” with “two young girls” from New York, according to a shocking new interview.

Virginia Roberts, who’s accused Epstein of turning her into a “sex slave” at age 17 and forcing her to sleep with his powerful friends, claimed Clinton stayed in one of the many villas on Epstein’s US Virgin Islands estate — where group sex was a “regular occurrence.”

“I remember asking Jeffrey, ‘What’s Bill Clinton doing here?’ kind of thing, and he laughed it off and said, ‘Well, he owes me a favor,’ ” Roberts told her lawyers in a 2011 interview obtained by RadarOnline.com. “He never told me what favors they were.”

Bubba was accompanied by two of Epstein’s regular girlfriends and “two young girls that I could identify,” Roberts claimed.

https://pagesix.com/2015/01/24/sex-slave-claims-bill-clinton-visited-epsteins-orgy-island/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

[Pavlov]

Man, TSA and his techo fog buddy are terrified of addressing the Acosta in the room.

It doesn't bother me if Clinton gets caught up in this. Let the chips fall where they may. Can Qhris and TSA say the same about Trump and Republicans?

[Winehole23]

What Epstein was doing wasn't a (D) or an (R) thing but a class/power move: passing around children for sex like party favors.

Solidarity in class impunity, tbh.

[Winehole23]

If they all died in a fire I wouldn't be sorry, but it'd be much more satisfying to see them all pilloried and prosecuted.

Get em, SDNY.

[TSA]

Former President Bill Clinton took a romantic jaunt in 2002 to convicted pedophile pal Jeffrey Epstein’s “orgy island” with “two young girls” from New York, according to a shocking new interview.

Virginia Roberts, who’s accused Epstein of turning her into a “sex slave” at age 17 and forcing her to sleep with his powerful friends, claimed Clinton stayed in one of the many villas on Epstein’s US Virgin Islands estate — where group sex was a “regular occurrence.”

“I remember asking Jeffrey, ‘What’s Bill Clinton doing here?’ kind of thing, and he laughed it off and said, ‘Well, he owes me a favor,’ ” Roberts told her lawyers in a 2011 interview obtained by RadarOnline.com. “He never told me what favors they were.”

Bubba was accompanied by two of Epstein’s regular girlfriends and “two young girls that I could identify,” Roberts claimed.

https://pagesix.com/2015/01/24/sex-slave-claims-bill-clinton-visited-epsteins-orgy-island/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

1147692761765728256

:lol

But lawyers for Epstein’s victims say Trump nonetheless may have useful information. Trump banned Epstein from his Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach “because Epstein sexually assaulted an underage girl at the club,” Bradley Edwards, an attorney who represents three of the young women, said in court documents.

Lawyers involved with the various Epstein cases said there is virtually no chance that the president will be required to testify in a matter in which both sides agree his involvement was tangential.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/labor-nominee-acosta-cut-deal-with-billionaire-in-sex-abuse-case-involving-40-underage-girls/2017/03/21/d33271a8-0d85-11e7-ab07-07d9f521f6b5_story.html?noredirect&utm_term=.8962ecfd5442


Fusion GPS tried to tie Trump to Clinton's pedophile pal Epstein as part of smear campaign

https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/dec/10/glenn-simpsons-fusion-gps-ran-donald-trump-smear-c/?utm_source=onesignal&utm_campaign=pushnotify&utm_medium=push


1147873389983555584
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/1508967-deposition-excerpts.html

[Winehole23]

Lots of preemptive deflection from Red team.

Feeling nervous, TSA?

[TSA]

What Epstein was doing wasn't a (D) or an (R) thing but a class/power move: passing around children for sex like party favors.

Solidarity in class impunity, tbh.

It’s not a Dem or Rep thing, but it’s hilarious watching the Dems try say Trump was involved.

[TSA]

Lots of preemptive deflection from Red team.

Feeling nervous, TSA?
Nervous about what winehole?

You’re confusing deflecting with debunking.

“Lawyers involved with the various Epstein cases said there is virtually no chance that the president will be required to testify in a matter in which both sides agree his involvement was tangential.”

Yqb59n69Z80


The only thing that I can say about President Trump is that he is the only person who, in 2009 when I served a lot of subpoenas on a lot of people, or at least gave notice to some pretty connected people, that I want to talk to them, is the only person who picked up the phone and said, let’s just talk. I’ll give you as much time as you want. I’ll tell you what you need to know, and was very helpful, in the information that he gave, and gave no indication whatsoever that he was involved in anything untoward whatsoever, but had good information. That checked out and that helped us and we didn’t have to take a deposition of him in 2009.

[Pavlov]

TSA has shut the fuck up about Acosta after his stupid theory that Trump appointed him to pwn the Dems over this case.

That's all anyone needs to know about TSA.

[TSA]

1147657745253855233

:lol “faves”

[Pavlov]

Is Acosta your fave or something?

:lol TSA

[Winehole23]

Is Acosta your fave or something?

:lol TSADJT sure is.

TSA is deflecting like crazy when not a single poster ITT has accused him of anything besides being his friend.

[Pavlov]

DJT sure is.

TSA is deflecting like crazy when not a single poster ITT has accused him.Not sure if you caught it -- did you see TSA's nutbag Trump 43-D chess theory about Acosta when he was appointed?

[Winehole23]

Not sure if you caught it -- did you see TSA's nutbag Trump 43-D chess theory about Acosta when he was appointed?So many conspiracies, I must've missed that one.

In a nutshell, what was it?

[Spurminator]

DJT sure is.

TSA is deflecting like crazy when not a single poster ITT has accused him.

TSA exhibits the true TDS, like all Qfags.

[Pavlov]

So many conapiracies, I must've missed that one.

In a nutshell, what was it?He said Trump appointed Acosta so his plea deal with Epstein would be aired out in his confirmation hearings and somehow would be a fatality for the Democrats.

Called it a brilliant move by Trump.

Don't think he has ever mentioned Acosta since.

I'll look for it when the search function is back on.

[TSA]

DJT sure is.

TSA is deflecting like crazy when not a single poster ITT has accused him of anything besides being his friend.


How is directly addressing the “friendship” claim deflecting winehole?

“Fusion GPS, the opposition research firm whose Democrat-financed Russia dossier fueled an FBI investigation into Donald Trump, pitched other stories about the Republican presidential candidate to Washington reporters, including an attempt to tie him to a convicted pedophile who was once buddies with former President Bill Clinton.

Journalist sources told The Washington Times that Fusion founder Glenn Simpson pushed the idea of a close relationship between Mr. Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, who pleaded guilty in 2008 to soliciting sex from an underage girl.

The Trump-Epstein link appears purely social, far short of Mr. Clinton’s 20-plus plane rides on Epstein’s “Lolita Express” private jet around the globe in the early 2000s.

Ken Silverstein, the reporter who ultimately wrote an Epstein-Trump report, confirmed to The Times that Fusion had sourced the story.”

https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/dec/10/glenn-simpsons-fusion-gps-ran-donald-trump-smear-c/?utm_source=onesignal&utm_campaign=pushnotify&utm_medium=push

[Pavlov]

How is directly addressing the “friendship” claim deflecting winehole?

“Fusion GPS, the opposition research firm whose Democrat-financed Russia dossier fueled an FBI investigation into Donald Trump, pitched other stories about the Republican presidential candidate to Washington reporters, including an attempt to tie him to a convicted pedophile who was once buddies with former President Bill Clinton.

Journalist sources told The Washington Times that Fusion founder Glenn Simpson pushed the idea of a close relationship between Mr. Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, who pleaded guilty in 2008 to soliciting sex from an underage girl.

The Trump-Epstein link appears purely social, far short of Mr. Clinton’s 20-plus plane rides on Epstein’s “Lolita Express” private jet around the globe in the early 2000s.

Ken Silverstein, the reporter who ultimately wrote an Epstein-Trump report, confirmed to The Times that Fusion had sourced the story.”

https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/dec/10/glenn-simpsons-fusion-gps-ran-donald-trump-smear-c/?utm_source=onesignal&utm_campaign=pushnotify&utm_medium=pushFrom your article:

Silverstein: "...Fusion never pressured me to write anything untrue, and they never told me anything about ties between DT and JE that was false. That’s important. Their work has been solid if not 100 percent accurate in their reports, just as I periodically make mistakes. I have never seen malice or anything less than the best effort to be accurate."

So the actual story was a nothingburger and this story you just posted about it is a nothingburger.

lol TSA

[TSA]

Lots of preemptive deflection from Red team.

Feeling nervous, TSA?

Again winehole, what would I be nervous about?

[Pavlov]

Again winehole, what would I be nervous about?Acosta.

[Winehole23]

Again winehole, what would I be nervous about?You're the only one who can explain why you're so busy on this particular point. I have no idea why you're retconning Trump's known and admitted association with Jeffrey Epstein.

[TSA]

You're the only one who can explain why you're so busy on this particular point. I have no idea why you're retconning Trump's known and admitted association with Jeffrey Epstein.

I’m not disputing Trump’s association with Epstein, but to try and cast it as a friendship or anything on the level of the Clinton/Epstein relationship is laughable.

[Pavlov]

But no one is doing that.

You're on this jihad for nothing.

[Winehole23]

Let's suppose arguendo that there's nothing untoward about Trump in the unsealed records or the current indictment of Epstein, but that it shows Acosta to be corrupt.

After the Miami Times Herald's expose, keeping Acosta on as Labor Sec'y is grossly incompetent. Should have come up during vetting, tbh.

Trump also seems to have overlooked Elliot Broidy's chequered past, one can see why TSA would be spooked by the emerging pattern of Trump's lenience toward pedos of his own social class and their enablers.

"Many of them on the younger side."

[Spurminator]

I'll look for it when the search function is back on.

Google does the job, fyi.


Feds planned to indict Epstein, but U.S. attorney retreated from child sex-abuse charges


In 2007, the U.S. attorney’s office seemed on track to charge Palm Beach billionaire Jeffrey Epstein in a sweeping indictment, accusing him of running a ring to pay underage girls for his sexual pleasure.
But the office’s leader, Alex Acosta, retreated from what appeared to be a strong federal prosecution, bolstered with 40 female victims, and opted to let the state attorney charge Epstein in a streamlined prostitution case involving minors.
The bruising negotiations between Acosta’s office and Epstein’s defense team ended with the U.S. attorney’s decision not to present the 53-page indictment to a federal grand jury.


Instead, Acosta signed off on a non-prosecution agreement that spared Epstein from five federal charges accusing him of an interstate commerce conspiracy to recruit girls from 13 to 17 years old for sex at his Palm Beach mansion. If he had been indicted and convicted by the feds, Epstein could have been sent to prison for the rest of his life.

Acosta’s dominant role in deciding Epstein’s fate is expected to be scrutinized at his upcoming Senate confirmation hearing as President Donald Trump’s nominee for secretary of labor (http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article134547364.html).

http://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article136117138.html#storylink=cpy


Brilliant move by Trump as Epstein is already headed back to court. Dems will be forced to ask Acosta why he did what he did and who pressured him to do so.






Yes brilliant.

Acosta has already spoken that he was pressured by higher ups to do so, now he can name names. Wouldn't be surprised to see Acosta name the Clintons during the confirmation hearings.

[Pavlov]

:lmao 2007 "higher ups" include the Clintons.

[TSA]

Let's suppose arguendo that there's nothing untoward about Trump in the unsealed records or the current indictment of Epstein, but that it shows Acosta to be corrupt.
The decisions were coming from much higher up than Acosta. The question now is from who and why.

1147677475394195458

[Winehole23]

The decisions were coming from much higher up than Acosta. The question now is from who and why.

1147677475394195458Is there some reason you didn't post the Techno Fog post immediately following those two?


1147678315962163200

[Winehole23]

Who in the Bush Administration do you think was ordering Acosta what to do?

It's not my impression that the FBI supervises US Attorneys, is it yours?

[ElNono]

The decisions were coming from much higher up than Acosta. The question now is from who and why.

1147677475394195458

What's the conspiracy here? Acosta is a victim? He clearly was the guy authorized to sign off on the deal (he did), and could've simply walked away from it/resigned.

Please explain your theory.

[Pavlov]

What's the conspiracy here? Acosta is a victim? He clearly was the guy authorized to sign off on the deal (he did), and could've simply walked away from it/resigned.

Please explain your theory.Dude you remember how bad things were in Bill Clinton's fourth term. His DOJ was out of control.

[Winehole23]

What's the conspiracy here? Acosta is a victim? He clearly was the guy authorized to sign off on the deal (he did), and could've simply walked away from it/resigned.

Please explain your theory.I wonder how he'll explain why Barr's DOJ argued the plaintiffs are bootless even though Acosta's deal was found to have broken the law.

https://amp.miamiherald.com/news/state/florida/article231916968.html#click=https://t.co/RLQURa9AYj

[ElNono]

I mean, I get that even if Acosta is just incompetent, it would reflect poorly on Trump just for picking such a guy to lead anything.

However, the list of incompetent public servants selected by presidents of every denomination is long and varied.

Kinda odd to see people going on the defensive about this. Poor judgement is not necessarily a crime.

[Winehole23]

I mean, I get that even if Acosta is just incompetent, it would reflect poorly on Trump just for picking such a guy to lead anything.It has been reported that Acosta was briefly considered as a replacement for Sessions as AG, but that the Epstein NDL was considered too big a risk for confirmation.

[spurraider21]

1147692761765728256

:lol

But lawyers for Epstein’s victims say Trump nonetheless may have useful information. Trump banned Epstein from his Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach “because Epstein sexually assaulted an underage girl at the club,” Bradley Edwards, an attorney who represents three of the young women, said in court documents.

Lawyers involved with the various Epstein cases said there is virtually no chance that the president will be required to testify in a matter in which both sides agree his involvement was tangential.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/labor-nominee-acosta-cut-deal-with-billionaire-in-sex-abuse-case-involving-40-underage-girls/2017/03/21/d33271a8-0d85-11e7-ab07-07d9f521f6b5_story.html?noredirect&utm_term=.8962ecfd5442


Fusion GPS tried to tie Trump to Clinton's pedophile pal Epstein as part of smear campaign

https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/dec/10/glenn-simpsons-fusion-gps-ran-donald-trump-smear-c/?utm_source=onesignal&utm_campaign=pushnotify&utm_medium=push


1147873389983555584
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/1508967-deposition-excerpts.html
that deposition confirms that epstein's brother only met trump once, and it as on a smaller plane. how could he possibly testify whether or not trump on any other occasion flew on that plane?

[boutons_deux]

I mean, I get that even if Acosta is just incompetent, it would reflect poorly on Trump just for picking such a guy to lead anything.

I really doubt Trash knows who is being handed to him by the oligarchy, by Leonard Leo, etc.

He's just too fucking stupid and ignorant to know these people who fuck up America under his insane reign.

Apparently, Epstein has had life long list of high-up enablers, protectors of his criminal sex life, some of whom, I bet, are fucked his young girls (and boys).

Conspiracy: Nothing to do with Acosta's incompetence. Acosta was rewarded the DoL job quid pro quo for letting (Trash's and others' buddy) Epstein off, keeping closed a Pandora's Box of co-criminals.

[TSA]

Who in the Bush Administration do you think was ordering Acosta what to do?

It's not my impression that the FBI supervises US Attorneys, is it yours?If I knew who above Acosta at main justice was making the calls I wouldn’t be asking lol. It is clear though that someone above Acosta was pulling strings.

1090659751778754560

[Pavlov]

If I knew who above Acosta at main justice was making the calls I wouldn’t be asking lol. It is clear though that someone above Acosta was pulling strings.

1090659751778754560Since the result wasn't legal, of course we don't like the result.

Why does TSA think Hillary Clinton was calling the shots at the DOJ in 2007?

That's fucking insane.

[Winehole23]

If I knew who above Acosta at main justice was making the calls I wouldn’t be asking lol. It is clear though that someone above Acosta was pulling strings. You don't know, you can't even venture a guess, but you know in your bones there's a conspiracy.

Cool story.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/gatewaypundit/status/1148216519459057667?s=19


:corn:

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet/status/1148273653685084162?s=19

[Pavlov]

https://twitter.com/gatewaypundit/status/1148216519459057667?s=19


:corn::lol that "news" network didn't even, you know, go to the library to do their own research?

It's the big building sticking out over the river. Can't miss it.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/GrrrGraphics/status/1148259913455423488?s=19

[Pavlov]

https://twitter.com/GrrrGraphics/status/1148259913455423488?s=19"I’ve known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy. He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it – Jeffrey enjoys his social life."

--Donald J. Trump

[TSA]

You don't know, you can't even venture a guess, but you know in your bones there's a conspiracy.

Cool story.

Did Epstein get a sweetheart deal? yes or no.

If your answer is yes than you too think there is a conspiracy.

Cool story, I know.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/stillgray/status/1148250953948131328?s=19

[Pavlov]

Did Epstein get a sweetheart deal? yes or no.

If your answer is yes than you too think there is a conspiracy.

Cool story, I know.Yeah, but how do the Clinton's control the Bush DOJ in your conspiracy theory?

[Pavlov]

https://twitter.com/stillgray/status/1148250953948131328?s=19Pizzagate was a pedophile panic.

You're still panicking, Qhris.

[TSA]

1148246102900191233

:lol he's so fucked

[Chucho]

He'll get off with a slap on the wrist in the grand scheme of things. He's got too many friends in high places and too much money to do real time with real inmates.

Almost as untouchable as any establishment politician.

[Will Hunting]

He'll get off with a slap on the wrist in the grand scheme of things. He's got too many friends in high places and too much money to do real time with real inmates.

Almost as untouchable as any establishment politician.
Only chance of him doing real time is because it’s such a widely covered story the DA will feel media pressure to string him up, the rich guys are usually able to cut laughable plea deals when the public isn’t paying attention.

[Chucho]

Only chance of him doing real time is because it’s such a widely covered story the DA will feel media pressure to string him up, the rich guys are usually able to cut laughable plea deals when the public isn’t paying attention.


I used to fully believe all you had to be was rich and famous to murder, kill, rob and rape with no worries of recourse, but after Cosby got locked up a little faith was restored but this dude is levels above Cosby so far as importance, power and connections. Would be nice for us regular schmucks to have some more faith restored.

[ElNono]

Did Epstein get a sweetheart deal? yes or no.

If your answer is yes than you too think there is a conspiracy.

Cool story, I know.

That’s actually not true. Him getting a sweetheart deal is a fact. Why he got it is what’s being investigated. There’s no conspiracy there, unless you make one up.

[TSA]

That’s actually not true. Him getting a sweetheart deal is a fact. Why he got it is what’s being investigated. There’s no conspiracy there, unless you make one up.

smh. The conspiracy was his sweetheart deal.

[TSA]

I used to fully believe all you had to be was rich and famous to murder, kill, rob and rape with no worries of recourse, but after Cosby got locked up a little faith was restored but this dude is levels above Cosby so far as importance, power and connections. Would be nice for us regular schmucks to have some more faith restored.

Epstein is also levels above Cosby so far as what he did.

[Winehole23]

Did Epstein get a sweetheart deal? yes or no.

If your answer is yes than you too think there is a conspiracy.

Cool story, I know.There must be some reason Trump nominated Acosta despite giving Epstein a sweetheart deal, and some reason why every Republican voted to confirm him, right?

Just following your line of inference here.

[Chris]

ORANGE MAN BAD!

Yes, we know.

[Chucho]

Yes, we know.

He made a legitimate post about a legitimate concern. Why aren't you concerned?

[TSA]

There must be some reason Trump nominated Acosta despite giving Epstein a sweetheart deal, and some reason why every Republican voted to confirm him, right?

Just following your line of inference here.

Did Epstein get a sweetheart deal? Yes or no.

[ElNono]

smh. The conspiracy was his sweetheart deal.

That’s not a conspiracy, the deal is a fact. Clearly, not the first guy that gets a sweetheart deal.

What you’re trying to do is connect some imaginary dots on why he got that deal, based on tweets.

Fortunately our justice system has a much higher bar.

[ElNono]

This is really not that complicated. Take Seth Rich, he died. The conspiracy theory isn’t that he didn’t die, is why he died.

In other words, a conspiracy is an ulterior motive to reach a fact. It’s not the fact itself.

[TSA]

That’s not a conspiracy, the deal is a fact. Clearly, not the first guy that gets a sweetheart deal.

What you’re trying to do is connect some imaginary dots on why he got that deal, based on tweets.

Fortunately our justice system has a much higher bar.

Since when can a conspiracy not be a fact? If conspiracies can not be facts conspiracies couldn’t exist.

[TSA]

This is really not that complicated. Take Seth Rich, he died. The conspiracy theory isn’t that he didn’t die, is why he died.

In other words, a conspiracy is an ulterior motive to reach a fact. It’s not the fact itself.

conspiracy =/= conspiracy theory

[TSA]

Jake Tapper just had a very unbiased segment on Epstein and shockingly brought up Clinton and his flights and trips to the island.

:bobo CNN

[TSA]

welp

1148281994905870336

[Winehole23]

Yes, we know.Whoever fucked a kid should be thrown into (the legal equivalent of) a wood chipper.

I don't presume that'll be Trump, Clinton, Prince Andrew or anyone else.

Trump knew Acosta was too compromised by the Epstein NDA to replace Sessions as AG, how come he was good enough to be Labor Sec'y?

[Pavlov]

TSA and Qhris dodging dem Acosta questions

https://media1.tenor.com/images/0b232a4d4c306b997f5f0d7c6d4850f5/tenor.gif

[Reck]

Like how the usual Trumpster are willfully ignoring Trump even knowing this guy but is gladly pointing out how Clinton is SOL and going down with this pedo.


“He’s a lot of fun to be with,” the president said at the time. “It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.”

:lol As I do :lol

[Spurtacular]

Like how the usual Trumpster are willfully ignoring Trump even knowing this guy but is gladly pointing out how Clinton is SOL and going down with this pedo.

:lol As I do :lol

Trump referred to women, right? Not girls?

:lol Hopeful eunuch :lol

[Reck]

"I'm going to be dating her in 10 years."

To a 10 year old. Who says that to a minor? A deprived pedophile is who..

[TSA]

Like how the usual Trumpster are willfully ignoring Trump even knowing this guy but is gladly pointing out how Clinton is SOL and going down with this pedo.



:lol As I do :lol

1 assisted the FBI and the victim’s lawyers and 1 was flying around on the Lolita Express, visiting Epstein’s island, and inviting the woman who procured Epstein’s underage girls to his daughters wedding.

[Pavlov]

1 assisted the FBI and the victim’s lawyers and 1 was flying around on the Lolita Express, visiting Epstein’s island, and inviting the woman who procured Epstein’s underage girls to his daughters wedding.1 appointed the attorney who gave Epstein a sweetheart deal to his cabinet.

:lol you sure shut the fuck up about that.

[Spurtacular]

1 appointed the attorney who gave Epstein a sweetheart deal to his cabinet.

:lol you sure shut the fuck up about that.

Tell us about your conspiracy theory.

[Chris]

https://a57.foxnews.com/static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2019/07/1862/1048/flightlogpic1-1.jpg?ve=1&tl=1



Epstein and fellow passengers are identified on manifests by their initials or first names, including “Tatiana.” The tricked-out jet earned its Nabakov-inspired nickname because it was reportedly outfitted with a bed where passengers had group sex with young girls.

[Pavlov]

https://d2pggiv3o55wnc.cloudfront.net/oann/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/ACOSTA.jpg

[Chucho]

https://a57.foxnews.com/static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2019/07/1862/1048/flightlogpic1-1.jpg?ve=1&tl=1

But it's ok that the current President was a good friend and more than likely did the same exact thing as Clinton?

[Chris]

But it's ok that the current President was a good friend and more than likely did the same exact thing as Clinton?

I don't do more than likely. I do flight logs and testimony.

[Pavlov]

I don't do more than likely. I do flight logs and testimony.:lmao you do fake news and innuendo

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/BreitbartNews/status/1148315027813949440

[Reck]

I don't do more than likely. I do flight logs and testimony.

You also dont do words spoken by Trump himself about his friendship and closeness with this pedo.

[Pavlov]

https://twitter.com/BreitbartNews/status/1148315027813949440Posting the same shit from ten different sources.

[TSA]

But it's ok that the current President was a good friend and more than likely did the same exact thing as Clinton?

:lol good friend

Fusion GPS tried to tie Trump to Clinton's pedophile pal Epstein as part of smear campaign

https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/dec/10/glenn-simpsons-fusion-gps-ran-donald-trump-smear-c/

Chuch have you learned nothing after the Fusion GPS/Steele dossier?

[Chris]

Didn't Trump ban the guy from Maralago like 20 years ago? Good friends don't do that.

[TSA]

You also dont do words spoken by Trump himself about his friendship and closeness with this pedo.


Publicly pronouncing someone has a thing for very young girls is what all close friends do :lol

[Chris]

Publicly pronouncing someone has a thing for very young girls is what all close friends do :lol

ikr :lol Trump buried him in that quote.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/BreitbartNews/status/1148347261157556225

[Chucho]

:lol good friend

Fusion GPS tried to tie Trump to Clinton's pedophile pal Epstein as part of smear campaign

https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/dec/10/glenn-simpsons-fusion-gps-ran-donald-trump-smear-c/

Chuch have you learned nothing after the Fusion GPS/Steele dossier?

I've learned that everytime there looks to be vindication, there's never any. Nothing happens, nothing will happen...on both sides.

But I know the quote, I know Trump is an elitist and I know we're at the tip of the iceberg so far as sexual deviance being revealed amongst elitists go. Now it's just a matter of who is most well connected in a game of survival of the fittest.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/RealVinnieJames/status/1148378282192068608

[TSA]

ikr :lol Trump buried him in that quote.

_pIIDRWvgC0

Trumpstradamus

[Chris]

_pIIDRWvgC0

Trumpstradamus

You can tell they are close friends.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1148377677604114438

oof what a moose

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/thebradfordfile/status/1148373461556957185

[TSA]

1 assisted the FBI and the victim’s lawyers and 1 was flying around on the Lolita Express, visiting Epstein’s island, and inviting the woman who procured Epstein’s underage girls to his daughters wedding.

:lol both sides

Attorneys for convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein touted his close friendship with Bill Clinton and even claimed the billionaire helped start Clinton's controversial family foundation in a 2007 letter aimed at boosting his image during plea negotiations, FoxNews.com has learned.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/billionaire-sex-offender-epstein-once-claimed-he-co-founded-clinton-foundation

[Chris]

In 2010, after completing a jail sentence related to a sex case in Florida, child sex predator Jeffrey Epstein reportedly hosted George Stephanopoulos, Katie Couric, Woody Allen and Chelsea Handler at his New York City townhouse.

[Pavlov]

Qhris and TSA still haven't mentioned one thing about Acotsa.

Not.

One.

Thing.

[spurraider21]

Qhris and TSA still haven't mentioned one thing about Acotsa.

Not.

One.

Thing.
didnt he name-drop the clintons at his confirmation hearing?

[Spurminator]

didnt he name-drop the clintons at his confirmation hearing?

Yep, then he picked up the mic and dropped it while leading a "Q" chant on his way out of the room.

[Pavlov]

The best part is they think we'll be personally hurt if something ever happens to the Clintons.

JFK Jr. will personally arrest them.

[TSA]

https://a57.foxnews.com/static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2019/07/1862/1048/flightlogpic1-1.jpg?ve=1&tl=1

1148358461551521792

:lol only 4 trips

[Reck]

1148358461551521792

:lol only 4 trips

You think The Clintons are criminals who put hits on people. Awfully nice of them to keep a pedo on the loose who may or may not have hard evidence that can obliterate the Clinton legacy.

Something to think about..

[TSA]

1148241562251517954

1148245567899930624

[TSA]

You think The Clintons are criminals who put hits on people. Awfully nice of them to keep a pedo on the loose who may or may not have hard evidence that can obliterate the Clinton legacy.

Something to think about..

Nothing you come up with is really worth thinking about

[Pavlov]

1148358461551521792

:lol only 4 trips1 Asia trip = at least 5 logged flights

[Reck]

1148241562251517954

1148245567899930624

She's on CNN right now.

[Reck]

Nothing you come up with is really worth thinking about

Right because it exposes your retarded conspiracy claims out of the water.

:lol Criminals who run a pedo ring
:lol Lotita express

[Spurminator]

The best part is they think we'll be personally hurt if something ever happens to the Clintons.

JFK Jr. will personally arrest them.

Yep. If Bill Clinton were implicated, basically everyone on the left will expect him to be held accountable.

If Trump were implicated, the Qfags will cry that it was a farce and start digging into the personal lives of people involved in the investigation. Either way, TSA and Chris will have something else to keep their shitty little lives occupied for months. :cheer

[Spurminator]

The best part is they think we'll be personally hurt if something ever happens to the Clintons.

JFK Jr. will personally arrest them.

Yep. If Bill Clinton were implicated, basically everyone on the left will expect him to be held accountable. He'll be abandoned and shunned like Wiener.

If Trump were implicated, the Qfags will cry that it was a farce and start digging into the personal lives of people involved in the investigation. Either way, TSA and Chris will have something else to keep their shitty little lives occupied for months. :cheer

[Pavlov]

1148358461551521792

:lol only 4 tripsAnyone can look at the flight logs.

Asia trip:

Naval Air Facility Atsugi, Japan - Hong Kong

Hong Kong - Shenzhen

Shenzhen - Singapore

Singapore - Bangkok

Bangkok - Brunei

Poor fella TSA got trips and flights all mixed up.:cry

[TSA]

1148358461551521792

:lol only 4 trips

1148402900986671104

1148404843280818176

:lol only 4 trips

[TSA]

Yep. If Bill Clinton were implicated, basically everyone on the left will expect him to be held accountable. He'll be abandoned and shunned like Wiener.

If Trump were implicated, the Qfags will cry that it was a farce and start digging into the personal lives of people involved in the investigation. Either way, TSA and Chris will have something else to keep their shitty little lives occupied for months. :cheer

How many months did your Adam Lambert alt keep your shitty little life occupied Spurm?

[Pavlov]

1148402900986671104

1148404843280818176

:lol only 4 trips:lol passive aggressive TSA.

Anyone can look at the logs.

You didn't.

Because you're stupid and believe anything.

Like Q.

:lol

[TSA]

Right because it exposes your retarded conspiracy claims out of the water.

:lol Criminals who run a pedo ring
:lol Lotita express


Hey you actually posted something worth thinking about.

Why are you lol’ing at criminal pedo rings and the Lolita express? Do you think the Epstein news is fake?

[TSA]

Right because it exposes your retarded conspiracy claims out of the water.

:lol Criminals who run a pedo ring
:lol Lotita express

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D-_hB9RXoAAfVL5?format=png&name=900x900

Does this describe a criminal pedo ring and do you find it funny?

[Pavlov]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D-_hB9RXoAAfVL5?format=png&name=900x900

Does this describe a criminal pedo ring and do you find it funny?Wait, now that it's not a candidate for the Alabama senate seat you're calling him a pedo?

[Winehole23]

TSA and Qhris dodging dem Acosta questions

https://media1.tenor.com/images/0b232a4d4c306b997f5f0d7c6d4850f5/tenor.gifEvery single one.

[Winehole23]

Manhattan DA Cy Vance Jr. put on the kid gloves for Epstein, just like he did for Harvey Weinstein, Don Jr. and Ivanka.

"The law is for little people "

Throw the bum out.

1148357359636533250

[boutons_deux]

...

[ElNono]

conspiracy =/= conspiracy theory

A conspiracy is ‘to commit X’. That’s what any indictment will read, which makes a conspiracy inherently the process...

And let’s not overlook that your argument so far is indeed a conspiracy theory...

[TSA]

A conspiracy is ‘to commit X’. That’s what any indictment will read, which makes a conspiracy inherently the process...

And let’s not overlook that your argument so far is indeed a conspiracy theory...

This is boring Nono. :bobo

[ElNono]

This is boring Nono. :bobo

I guess it wasn’t boring when you tried to use it as a gotcha question to validate your conspiracy theory... :rolleyes

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/Patrici15767099/status/1148644646848831488?s=19

[TSA]

I guess it wasn’t boring when you tried to use it as a gotcha question to validate your conspiracy theory... :rolleyes

I simply said a conspiracy took place, I never presented a conspiracy theory.

Do you think the Epstein NPA was above board?

[ElNono]

I simply said a conspiracy took place, I never presented a conspiracy theory.

Do you think the Epstein NPA was above board?

You actually did infer there’s a conspiracy at play supposedly coming from the highest ranks of the DOJ. That’s a conspiracy theory.

I’m not privy to the details of the agreement. If a prosecutor thinks it has enough evidence to pursue a case against it, then I’ll check out the indictment before forming an opinion.

[Chris]

Typical chicken shit non answer.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/Barnes_Law/status/1148666715242287105

[TSA]

You actually did infer there’s a conspiracy at play supposedly coming from the highest ranks of the DOJ. That’s a conspiracy theory.

I’m not privy to the details of the agreement. If a prosecutor thinks it has enough evidence to pursue a case against it, then I’ll check out the indictment before forming an opinion.

You know what evidence they had against Epstein and you know the deal he got. Knowing those things do you think the NOA was above board? yes or no.

[TSA]

“Is the Epstein case going to cause a problem [for confirmation hearings]?” Acosta had been asked. Acosta had explained, breezily, apparently, that back in the day he’d had just one meeting on the Epstein case. He’d cut the non-prosecution deal with one of Epstein’s attorneys because he had “been told” to back off, that Epstein was above his pay grade. “I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone,”

https://www.thedailybeast.com/jeffrey-epsteins-sick-story-played-out-for-years-in-plain-sight


The Herald learned that, as part of the plea deal, Epstein provided what the government called “valuable consideration” for unspecified information he supplied to federal investigators. While the documents obtained by the Herald don’t detail what the information was, Epstein’s sex crime case happened just as the country’s subprime mortgage market collapsed, ushering in the 2008 global financial crisis.

Records show that Epstein was a key federal witness in the criminal prosecution of two prominent executives with Bear Stearns, the global investment brokerage that failed in 2008, who were accused of corporate securities fraud. Epstein was one of the largest investors in the hedge fund managed by the executives, who were later acquitted. It is not known what role, if any, the case played in Epstein’s plea negotiations.

Read more here: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article220097825.html#storylink=cpy

[TSA]

:lol Would love to see Mueller asked next week about Epstein being an intelligence asset under Mueller’s FBI

[ElNono]

Typical chicken shit non answer.

You talking to me?

[ElNono]

You know what evidence they had against Epstein and you know the deal he got. Knowing those things do you think the NOA was above board? yes or no.

:lol @ ‘yes or no’ like you get to dictate my answers. I’m not Qhrisbot.

I don’t know what evidence they had against him, and I don’t know the details of the deal. Honest. As a matter of fact, I’ve never even heard of Epstein until some of you guys mentioned him here.

As far as your question, and based on the above, I have no idea. I’ve heard it was allegedly a ‘sweet deal’. Many rich and well connected get those... that’s as far as I know.

Now, if a prosecutor feels the law was broken and they can prove it, they should absolutely prosecute.

Here’s my question now, since you seem reluctant to admit it: are you peddling a conspiracy theory here?

[TSA]

:lol @ ‘yes or no’ like you get to dictate my answers. I’m not Qhrisbot.

I don’t know what evidence they had against him, and I don’t know the details of the deal. Honest. As a matter of fact, I’ve never even heard of Epstein until some of you guys mentioned him here.

As far as your question, and based on the above, I have no idea. I’ve heard it was allegedly a ‘sweet deal’. Many rich and well connected get those... that’s as far as I know.

Now, if a prosecutor feels the law was broken and they can prove it, they should absolutely prosecute.

Here’s my question now, since you seem reluctant to admit it: are you peddling a conspiracy theory here?

Nope. Just presenting facts and asking questions.

[TSA]

I want to know who above Acosta was calling the shots telling him to back off and why.

[boutons_deux]

I want to know who above Acosta was calling the shots telling him to back off and why.

Could have been any number of VIPs who fucked girls with Epstein.

[Chris]

As a matter of fact, I’ve never even heard of Epstein until some of you guys mentioned him here.

They say ignorance is bliss.

[Chris]

Nope. Just presenting facts and asking questions.

He's not privy to the details :jack

[ElNono]

They say ignorance is bliss.

When we need a cookie cut answer or what Ryan Saavedra thinks, we’ll let you know.

[ElNono]

I want to know who above Acosta was calling the shots telling him to back off and why.


And you think random tweets hold the answer to that or a court of law?

[ElNono]

Nope. Just presenting facts and asking questions.

Tweets are largely opinion, not facts.

[Chris]

Business Insider reported on President Donald Trump discussing Jeffrey Epstein after his arrest: "Well I knew him like everybody in Palm Beach knew him," Trump said. "He was a fixture of Palm Beach. I had a falling out with him a long time ago, I don't think I've spoken to him for 15 years. I wasn't a fan."

lol

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/bigleaguepol/status/1148700897041629184

[Winehole23]

:lol Would love to see Mueller asked next week about Epstein being an intelligence asset under Mueller’s FBIThere's as much evidence for that as the surmise Epstein was an asset of a foreign intelligence service. None, really.

[Winehole23]

The Bear Stearns connection is weird: that's where Epstein started out in business.

Vicky Ward reported on that too, about 15 years ago: no one yet has been able to figure out how Epstein made his nut.

[TSA]

Tweets are largely opinion, not facts.

The tweets I posted were emails showing main Justice's involvement, along with one of Epstein's lawyers saying approval came from main Justice. Emails and statement from Dershowitz opinion or fact?

I really enjoyed the no comment on the below quotes :lol

“Is the Epstein case going to cause a problem [for confirmation hearings]?” Acosta had been asked. Acosta had explained, breezily, apparently, that back in the day he’d had just one meeting on the Epstein case. He’d cut the non-prosecution deal with one of Epstein’s attorneys because he had “been told” to back off, that Epstein was above his pay grade. “I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone,”

https://www.thedailybeast.com/jeffre...in-plain-sight


The Herald learned that, as part of the plea deal, Epstein provided what the government called “valuable consideration” for unspecified information he supplied to federal investigators. While the documents obtained by the Herald don’t detail what the information was, Epstein’s sex crime case happened just as the country’s subprime mortgage market collapsed, ushering in the 2008 global financial crisis.

Records show that Epstein was a key federal witness in the criminal prosecution of two prominent executives with Bear Stearns, the global investment brokerage that failed in 2008, who were accused of corporate securities fraud. Epstein was one of the largest investors in the hedge fund managed by the executives, who were later acquitted. It is not known what role, if any, the case played in Epstein’s plea negotiations.

Read more here: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/loc...#storylink=cpy

[Winehole23]

Vicky Ward says her editors at Vanity fair and the NYT spiked many of the details now coming out. She tjinks they had been gotten to.

I can see why TSA is apparently aroused by the pedo/blackmail conspiracy, it backhandedly validates his intuition about Pizzagate -- vile corruption in high places.

Not sure why anyone would want to hold a shield for anyone involved, but there you have it, red team will defend their own and act like Epstein's grift was a blue team special.

Like I said before, throw anyone who fucked kids or enabled them to keep doing so in the wood chipper. Sure, throw Dersh, Cosby and Clinton in first if they did it. Alex Acosta trading his professional honor for access to money and power is eminently worthy of that treatment, toi.

[TSA]

There's as much evidence for that as the surmise Epstein was an asset of a foreign intelligence service. None, really.

999708976936767488

“Is the Epstein case going to cause a problem [for confirmation hearings]?” Acosta had been asked. Acosta had explained, breezily, apparently, that back in the day he’d had just one meeting on the Epstein case. He’d cut the non-prosecution deal with one of Epstein’s attorneys because he had “been told” to back off, that Epstein was above his pay grade. “I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone,”

https://www.thedailybeast.com/jeffre...in-plain-sight


The Herald learned that, as part of the plea deal, Epstein provided what the government called “valuable consideration” for unspecified information he supplied to federal investigators.

Read more here: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/loc...#storylink=cpy

[Chris]

"None, really" :lol

[TSA]

Vicky Ward says her editors at Vanity fair and the NYT spiked many of the details now coming out. She tjinks they had been gotten to.

I can see why TSA is apparently aroused by the pedo/blackmail conspiracy, it backhandedly validates his intuition about Pizzagate -- vile corruption in high places.

Not sure why anyone would want to hold a shield for anyone involved, but there you have it, red team will defend their own and act like Epstein's grift was a blue team special.

Like I said before, throw anyone who fucked kids or enabled them to keep doing so in the wood chipper. Sure, throw Dersh, Cosby and Clinton in first if they did it. Alex Acosta trading his professional honor for access to money and power is eminently worthy of that treatment, toi.Welcome to yesterday


1148241562251517954

1148245567899930624

[TSA]

"None, really" :lol

:lol

[Winehole23]

You might be putting the cart before horse. Sounds like he allocuted as part of the plea deal. Continued cooperation as a condition of non-prosecution is boilerplate.

The NDA preceded and stipulated cooperation, not the other way around, is more plausible than what you're suggesting, that Mueller leaned on Acosta to drop the matter.

You could be right, but all you've adduced in support of your hypothesis is more or less bald inference.We don't know who told Acosta he was getting above his pay grade, not that that should matter to a federal prosecutor whatsoever.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/mitchellvii/status/1148712087268597762

[Winehole23]

Welcome to yesterdayYeah, those are the articles I was paraphrasing in my own words. You should try it sometime.

[Winehole23]

"None, really" :lolAnother hypothesis iin Edgelandia s that Epstein was operating his pedo/blackmail grift on behalf of Mossad. Ehud Barak is an acquaintance of Epstein's. Epstein has other friends in high places in Israel as well.

You and TSA seem to think Mueller is somehow involved.

What evidence is out there to rule either of these possibilities in or out?

[Winehole23]

One RTed document plus a wild inference hardly makes a theory in the real world, but I can see your minds are already made up.

What convinced y'all you're right?

[TSA]

You might be putting the cart before horse. Sounds like he allocuted as part of the plea deal. Continued cooperation as a condition of non-prosecution is boilerplate.

The NDA preceded and stipulated cooperation, not the other way around, is more plausible than what you're suggesting, that Mueller leaned on Acosta to drop the matter.

You could be right, but all you've adduced in support of your hypothesis is more or less bald inference.We don't know who told Acosta he was getting above his pay grade, not that that should matter to a federal prosecutor whatsoever.

I don’t think it was Mueller who leaned on Epstein, I think it came from the DOJ.

[Winehole23]

What makes you think so?

[TSA]

Yeah, those are the articles I was paraphrasing in my own words. You should try it sometime.

No, I’ll continue to provide the link to the actual article to give credit to the author and let the reader see what the author wanted to actually convey rather than paraphrasing it myself.

[TSA]

Another hypothesis iin Edgelandia s that Epstein was operating his pedo/blackmail grift on behalf of Mossad. Ehud Barak is an acquaintance of Epstein's. Epstein has other friends in high places in Israel as well.

You and TSA seem to think Mueller is somehow involved.

What evidence is out there to rule either of these possibilities in or out?

Tell me more about your conspiracy theory. What evidence can you provide to even get the conversation started?

[Winehole23]

No, I’ll continue to provide the link to the actual article to give credit to the author and let the reader see what the author wanted to actually convey rather than paraphrasing it myself.Did I misstate any facts or mislead anyone?

I included enough information for any intereated reader to go on, and would gladly have provided links, if asked. Your your instant reply made that unnecessary

[TSA]

Did I misstate any facts or mislead anyone?

I included enough information for any intereated reader to go on, and would gladly have provided links, if asked. Your your instant reply made that unnecessary

You didn’t mislead anyone just provide a link next time and save everyone from having to google it :bobo

[Winehole23]

Tell me more about your conspiracy theory. What evidence can you provide to even get the conversation started?I'm not alleging any conspiracy, that's your hobby horse.

Y'all seem to think RTd docs plus wild inferences prove something, not aure what. I was just throwing out another hypothetical to aee if you or Chris can make a case for your own bs, or rule out competing inferences -- so far, you haven't.

Weak sauce, tbh.

[Pavlov]

lolHe said he was a fan tbh.

Was he lying then or is he lying now?

[TSA]

I'm not alleging any conspiracy, that's your hobby horse.

Y'all seem to think RTd docs plus wild inferences prove something, not aure what. I was just throwing out another hypothetical to aee if you or Chris can make a case for your own bs, or rule out competing inferences -- so far, you haven't.

Weak sauce, tbh.

You’ve thrown out nothing but a paraphrasing of someone else’s conspiracy theory and then expect Chris and I to rule it out? :rollin

[Pavlov]

:lol Qhris and TSA furiously fapping to right wing tweets.

[TSA]

Another hypothesis iin Edgelandia s that Epstein was operating his pedo/blackmail grift on behalf of Mossad. Now rule this out. :rollin

[Pavlov]

Another hypothesis iin Edgelandia s that Epstein was operating his pedo/blackmail grift on behalf of Mossad. Now rule this out. :rollin

Nope. Just presenting facts and asking questions.
:lmao TSA never fails to immediately shit on himself.

[ElNono]

The tweets I posted were emails showing main Justice's involvement, along with one of Epstein's lawyers saying approval came from main Justice. Emails and statement from Dershowitz opinion or fact?

Except that you didn’t post just the emails, they all have associated commentary to them. Are those facts or opinion?

Clearly none of those emails are an obvious smoking gun if they need to be explained? Do you agree?


I really enjoyed the no comment on the below quotes :lol

“Is the Epstein case going to cause a problem [for confirmation hearings]?” Acosta had been asked. Acosta had explained, breezily, apparently, that back in the day he’d had just one meeting on the Epstein case. He’d cut the non-prosecution deal with one of Epstein’s attorneys because he had “been told” to back off, that Epstein was above his pay grade. “I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone,”

https://www.thedailybeast.com/jeffre...in-plain-sight


The Herald learned that, as part of the plea deal, Epstein provided what the government called “valuable consideration” for unspecified information he supplied to federal investigators. While the documents obtained by the Herald don’t detail what the information was, Epstein’s sex crime case happened just as the country’s subprime mortgage market collapsed, ushering in the 2008 global financial crisis.

Records show that Epstein was a key federal witness in the criminal prosecution of two prominent executives with Bear Stearns, the global investment brokerage that failed in 2008, who were accused of corporate securities fraud. Epstein was one of the largest investors in the hedge fund managed by the executives, who were later acquitted. It is not known what role, if any, the case played in Epstein’s plea negotiations.

Read more here: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/loc...#storylink=cpy

So you’re advancing that Acosta is a victim here? Hard to tell with selective quotes. Tell us what you really think, in your own words.

[Winehole23]

You’ve thrown out nothing but a paraphrasing of someone else’s conspiracy theory and then expect Chris and I to rule it out? :rollinLook, if y'all have evidence for a hypothesis, you should be able to state that hypothesis in your own words, explain how the evidence supports your theory and rules out others.

If you can't, maybe what you've got isn't evidence or a hypothesis, but just heavy breathing.

[Winehole23]

Another hypothesis iin Edgelandia s that Epstein was operating his pedo/blackmail grift on behalf of Mossad. Now rule this out. :rollinso now you're back to no conspiracy?

shit on the pot or get off.

[Winehole23]

You’ve thrown out nothing but a paraphrasing of someone else’s conspiracy theory and then expect Chris and I to rule it out? :rollinAll y'all have done is throw out other people's theories and refused to restate them in your own words.

Y'all hide behind RT's and make fun of other posters. Like you have no take.

Do you have a take?

[Winehole23]

You said there's a conspiracy, Chris laughed at me for suggesting that's not well supported.

Can you connect the dots for your own theory, TSA?

[Winehole23]

Magpie Chris with nothing to say on his own behalf, as usual.

[ElNono]

Magpie Chris with nothing to say on his own behalf, as usual.

Maybe you can post a tweet, see if he speaks that language, tbh

[ElNono]

https://twitter.com/mitchellvii/status/1148712087268597762

lol @ wow!

[Pavlov]

That's TSA's shtick ever PizzaQate made him look like a complete dumbass.

Now he just posts the stuff he wants to be true without saying he believes it. He can say he didn't pimp it when it turns out to be bullshit, but if it somehow turns out to be true he can declare himself hipster edgelord supreme.

In short, he's trying to have it both ways.

lol TSA

Chris is all in on Q, but even he won't say he is.

Also bet hedging.

lol Qhris.

[ElNono]

Sure, he lacks credibility since it was established he got conned by Russian operatives, but TSA is entitled to his opinion.

Would be nice to hear what it is once in a while though.

[TSA]

Except that you didn’t post just the emails, they all have associated commentary to them. Are those facts or opinion?

Clearly none of those emails are an obvious smoking gun if they need to be explained? Do you agree?


So you’re advancing that Acosta is a victim here? Hard to tell with selective quotes. Tell us what you really think, in your own words.

Repeating myself here, but I think someone higher up in the DOJ leaned on Acosta.

[TSA]

so now you're back to no conspiracy?

shit on the pot or get off.

That’s your quote not mine. Did I confuse you?

[Chris]

Magpie Chris with nothing to say on his own behalf, as usual.

You're throwing a fit because you were wrong. I spit on you.

[ElNono]

Repeating myself here, but I think someone higher up in the DOJ leaned on Acosta.

There you go. Could’ve started there and saved me a lot of posts :lol

[Winehole23]

That’s your quote not mine. Did I confuse you?Nope.

You think Acosta was leaned on. According to the reporting, that's what he told Trump. Bad on Trump for hiring a guy who shielded pedos and shafted victims.

Acosta was an officer of the court who broke the law. Are you cool with that, TSA?

[TSA]

There you go. Could’ve started there and saved me a lot of posts :lol

If I’m repeating myself that means I didn’t start there.

[TSA]

Nope.

You think Acosta was leaned on. According to the reporting, that's what he told Trump. Bad on Trump for hiring a guy who shielded pedos and shafted victims.

Acosta was an officer of the court who broke the law. Are you cool with that, TSA?

Yes bad on Trump, and bad on Acosta too. I’m more concerned with who told Acosta to not move forward and why than either of those things, are you?

[Winehole23]

Yes bad on Trump, and bad on Acosta too. I’m more concerned with who told Acosta to not move forward and why than either of those things, are you?Hard to say without knowing more, but sure, that's a legit concern. Hard to imagine what's so important that it trumps busting a pedo ring.

[Winehole23]

You're throwing a fit because you were wrong. I spit on you.:lol

What was I wrong about?

What's your theory and what's the evidence?

[spurraider21]

I want to know who above Acosta was calling the shots telling him to back off and why.
he didnt drop any names during his confirmation hearing?

[TSA]

he didnt drop any names during his confirmation hearing?

pity hat tip

[TSA]

Hard to say without knowing more, but sure, that's a legit concern. Hard to imagine what's so important that it trumps busting a pedo ring.

But something did trump busting a pedo ring, that’s all I’m interested in.

[Winehole23]

But something did trump busting a pedo ring, that’s all I’m interested in.Let us know what you find out.

[ElNono]

If I’m repeating myself that means I didn’t start there.

I asked the same question earlier and you didn’t answer. Want me to quote?

[ElNono]

But something did trump busting a pedo ring, that’s all I’m interested in.

Isn’t that what’s being investigated? I mean for real, by the actual justice system, not self-appointed twitterazis.

[TSA]

I asked the same question earlier and you didn’t answer. Want me to quote?

No need. I said it earlier, not sure if before or after yours. I don’t ever check mentions/quotes nor go pages back to make sure I didn’t miss something. You are in now possession of the answer you were seeking.

[TSA]

Isn’t that what’s being investigated? I mean for real, by the actual justice system, not self-appointed twitterazis.


Yes that’s what’s being investigated. And it’s funny you mention self-appointed twitterazis, Mike Cernovich is getting zero credit in all of this, he’s the one who won in court and got all the documents released that are being reported on.

[ElNono]

Yes that’s what’s being investigated. And it’s funny you mention self-appointed twitterazis, Mike Cernovich is getting zero credit in all of this, he’s the one who won in court and got all the documents released that are being reported on.

But are those the documents being used by the prosecution?

[TSA]

But are those the documents being used by the prosecution?

Uh...no clue. What’s your point?

[ElNono]

Are you also going to credit the Miami Herald for the release of those documents?

[ElNono]

Uh...no clue. What’s your point?

Well, the only documents that matter are whatever the prosecution is using.

[TSA]

Are you also going to credit the Miami Herald for the release of those documents?

Yes they’ve done an outstanding job and deserve immense credit. I just find it funny how Cernovich’s role is being ignored in MSM coverage giving credit to MH.