Why do Dems keep attacking Tulsi Gabbard?

[DarrinS]

1085905418432348161

[Monostradamus]

She’s got some hot takes on the gays, which I’m sure is why Darrin is suddenly a fan.

[hater]

Called dat sheet :tu

They are already full force on her and its barely 2019 :lmao

Neocon demons are scared shitless of a Tulsi surge. They will attack her same way they did Bernie. Lets see if she has some balls unlike Bernie and fights back some

But she needs to form a decent base ASAP

IMO she should start touring USA like Trump did and somehow recruit Bernie or someone like Ocasio to support her. She wont be able to do squat by herself

[DarrinS]

She’s got some hot takes on the gays, which I’m sure is why Darrin is suddenly a fan.

Her take on gays, say 10 years ago? What is her take now?

[hater]

:lmao these resistanze fuckfaces are the scum of the earth

https://twitter.com/RVAwonk/status/1085089106521194496?s=20

https://twitter.com/RVAwonk/status/1083907101989261312?s=20

[hater]

Her take on gays, say 10 years ago? What is her take now?

He wouldnt know as his knowledge is limited to tweets and cnn panels :lmao

[Spurminator]

Her take on gays, say 10 years ago? What is her take now?


Hillary was against gay marriage until it became the official platform.

[boutons_deux]

How Tulsi Gabbard went from rising star to pariah — and then presidential candidate

Gabbard had so much promise.

Now her presidential bid feels quixotic.

Here’s what happened — and why it matters.

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/1/16/18182114/tulsi-gabbard-2020-president-campaign-explained

[Monostradamus]

He wouldnt know as his knowledge is limited to tweets and cnn panels :lmao
:lmao the retarded volume shooting tweet machine saying this.

[Will Hunting]

Same reason they attacked Bernie 4 years ago and, ironically, Howard Dean in 2004, she doesn’t fall in line with the establishment views.

Howard Dean is a piece of shit sell out. After the unfair treatment he got for being too far to the left in the 2004 primary when he was the best candidate, he should be sympathetic when the same thing happens to someone like Tulsi. Instead he’s moved his views to the right over the last 5-10 years just to get on the right side of the Clintons and to keep political relevance.

[Pavlov]

:lmao the retarded volume shooting tweet machine saying this.:rollin "fake accounts" hater

[djohn2oo8]

:lmao the retarded volume shooting tweet machine saying this.
Hater’s Mechanics are very much off. Looking like Russell Westbrook for 3. Jacking up shots left and right while they barely graze the rim.

[Monostradamus]

Her take on gays, say 10 years ago? What is her take now?
2016: https://www.ozy.com/rising-stars/tulsi-gabbard-a-young-star-headed-for-the-cabinet/62604


She tells me that, no, her personal views haven’t changed

She only supports gay marriage/LGBT rights because it benefits her politicially. Which is fine, I don’t care, but it’s pretty easy to see why she’s a libtard you’d semenshield for.

[hater]

lWfwqxwSUF8

[Will Hunting]

The criticism of Gabbard for supporting anti-gay movements in the early 2000s is bullshit. Being pro gay marriage at the time was considered to be toxic politically since a solid majority of the country was against it. Obama iirc was against gay marriage in 2004 and Clinton himself signed DOMA into law. The Dems’ stance on gay marriage didn’t change until enough millennials became of age to vote and made pro gay marriage the popular position among voters, prior to that pro gay marriage Dems regularly received labels like “unelectable”.

[Monostradamus]

The criticism of Gabbard for supporting anti-gay movements in the early 2000s is bullshit. Being pro gay marriage at the time was considered to be toxic politically since a solid majority of the country was against it. Obama iirc was against gay marriage in 2004 and Clinton himself signed DOMA into law. The Dems’ stance on gay marriage didn’t change until enough millennials became of age to vote and made pro gay marriage the popular position among voters, prior to that pro gay marriage Dems regularly received labels like “unelectable”.
Calling homosexuals “extremists” is quite a bit stronger than just pussyfooting around gay marriage legislation. Not that I care too much about it either way, she’s a politician so of course she flips views to benefit her career, they all do.

[hater]

The criticism of Gabbard for supporting anti-gay movements in the early 2000s is bullshit. Being pro gay marriage at the time was considered to be toxic politically since a solid majority of the country was against it. Obama iirc was against gay marriage in 2004 and Clinton himself signed DOMA into law. The Dems’ stance on gay marriage didn’t change until enough millennials became of age to vote and made pro gay marriage the popular position among voters, prior to that pro gay marriage Dems regularly received labels like “unelectable”.

Shhhh get with the program

Tulsi is a gay hating Assad apologist putin puppet

[Pavlov]

lWfwqxwSUF8No way you actually watched that.

[Monostradamus]

Shhhh get with the program

Tulsi is a gay hating Assad apologist putin puppet
:lmao acting like you’re not influenced by the machine when you have a daily flip-flop to whatever trendy bullshit shiny object gets tossed in front of you.

[hater]

:lmao acting like you’re not influenced by the machine when you have a daily flip-flop to whatever trendy bullshit shiny object gets tossed in front of you.

Been on Tulsi wagon since 2016 dipshit :lol

And no Tulsi is not trendy and will not be anytime soon. Unless Bernie joins her and she acquires the Bernie Bros army

[DarrinS]

So, she's not progressive enough?

[Monostradamus]

Been on Tulsi wagon since 2016 dipshit :lol

And no Tulsi is not trendy and will not be
:lmao on the tulsi bandwagon, along with the AOC, Beto, Cruz, Trump, Bernie, Michigan, Ohio State, orange juice with pulp, no pulp, WW3 COMING TOMORROW, and WW3 NOT COMING EVER bandwagons :lmao

[Monostradamus]

So, she's not progressive enough?
She hasn’t called you a cunt yet, I’m waiting on that before backing her.

[Will Hunting]

Calling homosexuals “extremists” is quite a bit stronger than just pussyfooting around gay marriage legislation. Not that I care too much about it either way, she’s a politician so of course she flips views to benefit her career, they all do.
I agree, but those are comments she made in her early 20s after being raised in an ultra religious family and a Republican dad. I’m not going to hold it against someone for not knowing any better about parroting the old fashioned views of their parents when she was only 20-25 years old.

My big issue isn’t really with this story itself, it’s with how these gotcha stories from 20+ years ago have become tools used to discredit the populist anti-establishment candidates before they can build any momentum in a primary. There’s never any effort by the media to dig up this kind of dirt on candidates like Hillary Clinton or Joe Biden, but when it’s discovered that Bernie Sanders was a Castro supporter back when he was in college 50 fucking years ago, or when Howard Dean (back when he was progressive) yells really loudly at a campaign rally, CNN makes sure that’s in the news cycle for weeks and hurts the candidate as much as possible.


Hillary herself has some quotes on gay people (see below).

““Marriage has got historic, religious and moral content that goes back to the beginning of time, and I think a marriage is as a marriage has always been, between a man and a woman.” - Hillary in 2000

[hater]

:lmao on the tulsi bandwagon, along with the AOC, Beto, Cruz, Trump, Bernie, Michigan, Ohio State, orange juice with pulp, no pulp, WW3 COMING TOMORROW, and WW3 NOT COMING EVER bandwagons :lmao

You forgot I was on Spurs wagon in 2013 dumbo :lmao

[hater]

https://twitter.com/rollingstone/status/1084977630791770113?s=21

:lol rollin stone

https://twitter.com/rollingstone/status/1084846629998469120?s=21

[hater]

1085905418432348161


https://twitter.com/themetsarecursd/status/1085953221162614784?s=21

[Pavlov]

https://twitter.com/themetsarecursd/status/1085953221162614784?s=21lol fake accounts

[hater]

:lmao vox

These loser nigas are just parroting the RNC Tulsi cheatsheet at this point :lmao

https://twitter.com/voxdotcom/status/1085858018414288902?s=21

[spurraider21]

She’s got some hot takes on the gays, which I’m sure is why Darrin is suddenly a fan.
I believe that marriage is the union between a man and a woman. Now, for me as a Christian—for me—for me as a Christian, it is also a sacred union. God’s in the mix.

[Pavlov]

I believe that marriage is the union between a man and a woman. Now, for me as a Christian—for me—for me as a Christian, it is also a sacred union. God’s in the mix.Yeah, that was a particularly tortured "evolution."

[Will Hunting]

https://twitter.com/rollingstone/status/1084977630791770113?s=21

:lol rollin stone

https://twitter.com/rollingstone/status/1084846629998469120?s=21
That’s disappointing, Rolling Stone usually doesn’t go for that kind of stuff, Taibbi in particular has been relentless in his criticism of terms such as “electable” translating to “whichever Democrat can act the most Republican”.

[Isitjustme?]

Shes polling at like 0.0% but yeah lets blame the establishment

[Winehole23]

So, she's not progressive enough?The reverse.

The Dem establishment hates the left almost as much as you do.

[hater]

The reverse.

The Dem establishment hates the left almost as much as you do.

Demon party is the new neocon war/walk street/corporatocracy party

This is because Trump hijacked the Repug party for himself

All establishment puppets and puppet masters are terrified of Tulsi as she could also hijack the last party remaining

[Reck]

1334405463375417344

Cant imagine why dems dont like her :lol

[spurraider21]

i regret buying some of the hype a while back, sheesh

1359037586715545601

[spurraider21]

fox news is one thing, but talking to crowder?

[SnakeBoy]

1395765298830012422