"Alpha Nancy"

[DMX7]

Trump won't give Nancy Pelosi a nickname so I will... "Alpha Nancy". Gentlemen, there is a new sheriff in town... sit back and enjoy. :toast

[Spurtacular]

Even your sub conscious made you put it in quotes. :lmao

[DMC]

To you she would be alpha.

[phxspurfan]

God bless Pelosi sons

[FrostKing]

https://i.ibb.co/9TStkbY/PELOSISKIN.jpg

Alpha indeed

[ElNono]

http://www.nuk3.com/gallery/images/comedy/full/4841.jpg

Nancy

[DarrinS]

alzheimer's Nancy

Listen to any recent public speaking

:lmao


She so gangsta tho :lol

[Winehole23]

alzheimer's Nancy

Listen to any recent public speaking

:lmao


She so gangsta tho :lolShe's a much sharper operator than Trump.

[Winehole23]

Trump got rolled.

[SpursforSix]

She's a much sharper operator than Trump.

A pair of mentally deficient geriatrics having a pissing contest. We should all be so proud.

[Winehole23]

Exactly half-right. Only one of the two is non compos mentis.

[SpursforSix]

Exactly half-right. Only one of the two is non compos mentis.

No way. Both have issues. The problems Pelosi has remembering and speaking are real. Something isn’t right with her. There needs to be some kind of competency test for these older politicians. And Supreme Court judges for life? That’s fucked up as well.

[Winehole23]

No way. Both have issues. The problems Pelosi has remembering and speaking are real. Something isn’t right with her. There needs to be some kind of competency test for these older politicians.We already have a solution for that: the ballot box.

[FrostKing]

The Don forcing Pelosi get back to work :lol

Lazy Nancy been spending too much in Bum Francisco emulating the poor work ethic

Keep draining that lazy cronie swamp

[apalisoc_9]

Getting beat by an 80 year old woman.

Trump

https://www.thecoli.com/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/holeup.png

[apalisoc_9]

Women rejoicing all over the world. Nancy beating the prime example of toxic masuclinity.

[FrostKing]

Women rejoicing all over the world. Nancy beating the prime example of toxic masuclinity.
Lazy Nancy told to get her ass back to work by The Don

[MASSA]

Women rejoicing all over the world. Nancy beating the prime example of toxic masuclinity.

Did Trump rape you?

[DMX7]

:rollin

1088907322594938880

[Winehole23]

Lazy Nancy told to get her ass back to work by The Donwhat winning looks like:

1089028874439135233

[FrostKing]

what winning looks like:

1089028874439135233
Haha. Random photo at random time.

[SpursforSix]

We already have a solution for that: the ballot box.

Obviously doesn’t work.

[Winehole23]

Haha. Random photo at random time.Here's another one



Close
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DxyD97hUUAARUcq.jpg:large
Previous
Next

[apalisoc_9]

:rollin

1088907322594938880

:lmao

[Winehole23]

White House staff watching:



Close
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DxyicocW0AALFRN.jpg:large
Previous
Next

[Winehole23]

they look like they're tired of winning

[Winehole23]

Trump tired of winning too:





Close
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DxzN2KjUUAArU6m.jpg:large

[Winehole23]

1088907876796690434

[StinkyWeezleteats]

L

L

L


L


L

L
BUT WE WON LOL

[FrostKing]

White House staff watching:



Close
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DxyicocW0AALFRN.jpg:large
Previous
Next






Trump has all that diversity on his staff?

[StinkyWeezleteats]

Lol “euros”

[StinkyWeezleteats]

Lol aren’t you from Europe?

[StinkyWeezleteats]

Trump has all that diversity on his staff?
Lol

[FrostKing]

Lol aren’t you from Europe?
Correct.

[StinkyWeezleteats]

Trump has all that diversity on his staff?

Lol JizzQueen

[StinkyWeezleteats]

Correct.

Then why do feel the need to post? Lol JizzQueen

[FrostKing]

Then why do feel the need to post? Lol JizzQueen
I am dual citizen.

[Winehole23]

No Senior staff since Omarosa left, The WHite House won't disclose numbers but obviously they're trying!

Back in August, Kellyanne Conway could only name one.

[StinkyWeezleteats]

I am dual citizen.

:lol

An immigrant?

[FrostKing]

:lol

An immigrant?
Yes

[Chris]

Trump has all that diversity on his staff?

That's Valerie Jarrett on the left and Susan Rice in the back. Looks like Prince Harry as well? :lol

Winetroll is an idiot.

[StinkyWeezleteats]

Yes

:lol

[StinkyWeezleteats]

That's Valerie Jarrett on the left and Susan Rice in the back. Looks like Prince Harry as well? :lol

Winetroll is an idiot.

emails doeeeeee

[Winehole23]

That's Valerie Jarrett on the left and Susan Rice in the back. Looks like Prince Harry as well? :lol

Winetroll is an idiot.nice catch!

[MASSA]

White House staff watching:



Close
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DxyicocW0AALFRN.jpg:large
Previous
Next





Bill Clinton f*cked the red head, tbh.

Also :lol at all those beta sycophants.

[Winehole23]

Trump looked every inch the beaten man today.

[apalisoc_9]

Getting beat by an 80 year old lady..you cant make this up :lmao

[Pavlov]

1088907876796690434Pelosi had to shame him out of being her hype man Friday afternoon.

[boutons_deux]

Trump looked every inch the beaten man today.

He tried to cover his bitch-slapped defeat by an old lady with worse-than-usual disjointed, random, incoherent bullshit.

[Trill Clinton]

Trump is Nancy's bitch. She made him bow down and kiss her stilettos.

[CosmicCowboy]

Emergency resolution in three weeks.

[boutons_deux]

Emergency resolution in three weeks.

America, example to the planet how to run a society

[Winehole23]

Emergency resolution in three weeks.Losing strategy.

It would be a crass abuse of power, excercised to acheive an unpopular policy that won't make make the border, or those living inside it, more secure.

[Winehole23]

The blowback would be fierce; the verdict of history unkind.

You don't trash republican government just because the lege doesn't give the president what he wants.

[Winehole23]

Face it CC, there is no emergency at the border besides the humanitarian emergency created by Trump's ham-fisted enforcement only approach.

[boutons_deux]

Face it CC, there is no emergency at the border besides the humanitarian emergency created by Trump's ham-fisted enforcement only approach.

the rightwingnutjobs ALWAYS criminalize the plaintiffs.

There IS a humanitarian crisis in the Northern Triangle, resulting from the USA fucking around,
meddling down there for 100 years, either to protect BigCorp (bananas, sugar) or "fight democratic socialism".

I believe these asylum seekers are owed US acceptance and protection

========

I was told in Costa Rica that McDonald's was making an offer to buy beef if the locals would cut down virgin forests to raise cattle. Fuck Capitalism back, it has certainly fucked the planet.

[DMC]

Losing strategy.

It would be a crass abuse of power, excercised to acheive an unpopular policy that won't make make the border, or those living inside it, more secure.

Well since MSM seems more interested in scoreboarding, it will add a point to his side.

[Winehole23]

Well since MSM seems more interested in scoreboarding, it will add a point to his side.Not to his popularity or reelectability, though.

[DMC]

Not to his popularity or reelectability, though.

Sounds like 2015 talking

[Th'Pusher]

Sounds like 2015 talking

Do you think Trump will be re-elected DMC?

[Allan Rowe vs Wade]

your nancy raped

[Joseph Kony]

Nancy rapedPERIOD

[FrostKing]

No more hanging out at NBA games for lazy nancy

Back to work ordered Trump!

[Pavlov]

:lol Cocaine Mitch
1088884848771678208

[ElNono]

Emergency resolution in three weeks.

The problem with that route is: Emergency resolution blocked in court in three weeks and 30 mins.

[ElNono]

The blowback would be fierce; the verdict of history unkind.

You don't trash republican government just because the lege doesn't give the president what he wants.

IMO, the biggest issue is post-Trump. This leaves a serious dent on the GOP afterwards, or expands executive power to overrule Congress in significant ways. Either of those roads are unhealthy to democracy.

[Will Hunting]

The problem with that route is: Emergency resolution blocked in court in three weeks and 30 mins.
Yup and even if SCOTUS were to eventually rule that Trump has the executive power to take such action, that’s not an overnight process. It’d take months at the least.

[DMC]

Do you think Trump will be re-elected DMC?

Chumpdumper shtick is already taken

[Pavlov]

:lol tough guy

[Th'Pusher]

Chumpdumper shtick is already taken
It was an honest question. Thanks for showing you’re incapable of proving an honest answer.

[DMC]

It was an honest question. Thanks for showing you’re incapable of proving an honest answer.

That was honest.

[Winehole23]

That was honest.You think Trump has the edge in 2020? That his contempt for government and the petty lives of government workers will serve him well in the election?

[pgardn]

Well since MSM seems more interested in scoreboarding, it will add a point to his side.

MSM aspires to your lofty goals.

mm

[Th'Pusher]

That was honest.

It wasn’t an answer.

[Winehole23]

It was technically an answer, but he denied to give the information requested.

DMC's pattern of avoiding political takes in a political forum continues. Apparently he prefers to bite ankles.

[Pavlov]

:lol tough guy

[Winehole23]

so tuff

[Winehole23]

quick, somebody give him a testosterone pill. his tits are starting to stain his shirt.

[boutons_deux]

You think Trump has the edge in 2020? That his contempt for government and the petty lives of government workers will serve him well in the election?

today he's gloating over the continued blood bath in journalism.

Like a good fascist, he hates anybody, anything that doesn't suck his dick, any and all dissent, in which of course, the security/police state concurs.

[Winehole23]

Oh go away boutons. Nobody cares what you say.

[Th'Pusher]

It was technically an answer, but he denied to give the information requested.

DMC's pattern of avoiding political takes in a political forum continues. Apparently he prefers to bite ankles.

He’s a Low value poster in that case.

[Winehole23]

He’s a Low value poster in that case.Used to be better, but I don't begrudge having other priorities.

[Winehole23]

Still, what a fucken pussy.

[Winehole23]

The cost of putting yourself out there on an anonymous board is zip, but he still shies away from it.

[DMC]

You think Trump has the edge in 2020? That his contempt for government and the petty lives of government workers will serve him well in the election?

I didn't think he had an edge in 2016. That's why I said "that's 2015 talking"

The incumbent always has the edge since he will have had 4 years to campaign for re-election and, unless the GOP decides to run someone against him, will automatically skip the primaries and the discovery process that goes with them. Have we learned anything new about Trump? I'd say no. He said "grab them by the pussy" and won. He was a reality TV guy, an orange one, who regularly feuded with people like Rosie O'Donnell. Those who voted for him won't suddenly vote for some liberal democrat just because Trump tried a power move.

[DMC]

It was technically an answer, but he denied to give the information requested.

DMC's pattern of avoiding political takes in a political forum continues. Apparently he prefers to bite ankles.

Asking me to speculate is pointless. Why do you care what an anonymous poster thinks will happen in 2 years?

[koriwhat]

Do you think Trump will be re-elected DMC?

if kamala harris is the lefts best then yes djt will be back in the WH come 2020 because he never left. have yall ever seen harris shit questioning while on the hill? that idiot is all about playing "what-ifs" and virtue signaling her ass off. ugh i hate the fact that i've wasted time listening to that retard during testimonies.

[CosmicCowboy]

The problem with that route is: Emergency resolution blocked in court in three weeks and 30 mins.

Of course. But it leaves Trump able to say "I did everything I could". It plays to his base and further incites their conviction that "liberals" don't give a shit about border security.

[ElNono]

Of course. But it leaves Trump able to say "I did everything I could". It plays to his base and further incites their conviction that "liberals" don't give a shit about border security.

IMO, the problem with that analysis is that he'll get a border security bill from the Dems that does not include wall funding, and he and Mitch are going to be on the hook for passing/not passing it.

That's going to be another fight in 3 weeks.

[CosmicCowboy]

IMO, the problem with that analysis is that he'll get a border security bill from the Dems that does not include wall funding, and he and Mitch are going to be on the hook for passing/not passing it.

That's going to be another fight in 3 weeks.

You are assuming Trump really gives a shit about a wall actually getting built. This is just about cynical people on both sides playing to their political base. He can sign the spending bill and then invoke emergency funding.

[vy65]

I didn't think he had an edge in 2016. That's why I said "that's 2015 talking"

The incumbent always has the edge since he will have had 4 years to campaign for re-election and, unless the GOP decides to run someone against him, will automatically skip the primaries and the discovery process that goes with them. Have we learned anything new about Trump? I'd say no. He said "grab them by the pussy" and won. He was a reality TV guy, an orange one, who regularly feuded with people like Rosie O'Donnell. Those who voted for him won't suddenly vote for some liberal democrat just because Trump tried a power move.


What’s interesting is not just that the approval rate is finally budging, but why—and with whom. Trump has long been happy to withstand the opprobrium of the press, elites, and much of the country. As my colleague Ron Brownstein has demonstrated, the president has opted for political tactics meant to shore up his base. This is strategically dubious—it’s hard to win reelection with 40 percent of the country—but it has been consistent. It has shown some success, too. While Trump’s overall approval is low, his standing among Republicans has remained very strong.

Shutting down the government over the wall was a part of that philosophy. The administration concluded that the wall was such an important issue for his base that it was worth whatever political blowback that might come from other quarters to get it done. As Ann Coulter, who effectively shamed him into the shutdown in December, recently put it, “He is dead in the water if he doesn’t build that wall. Dead, dead, dead.”

In practice, however, weakened standing among that base accounts for Trump’s slumping approval. The NPR/NewsHour/Marist poll finds that Trump’s approval is down among suburban men, white evangelicals, and men without a college degree, all key segments of his constituency. And while 83 percent of Republicans in that poll still support him, his net approval has slipped 10 points.

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2019/01/trump-approval-polls-shutdown/581215/

[vy65]

In the Politico/Morning Consult poll, Trump’s disapproval increased among evangelicals, non-college-educated voters, and those who voted for Trump in 2016, compared with a poll in early January. Meanwhile, the number who blamed Trump for the shutdown increased (slightly) among all three groups.
Interestingly, support among all three demographics in the Politico/Morning Consult poll for the wall has remained essentially constant. They haven’t changed their minds about the need for the wall; they’re just losing their faith in Trump and are fed up with the shutdown.

Nevertheless, the slippage in backing even among Trump’s base since the start of the shutdown calls into question the wisdom of the president’s calculation that the wall was an effective pander to his core supporters. It’s not just that Trump’s belief that Democrats would cave was out of touch with reality—even more dangerously for him, he was out of touch with the base.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/speakerpelosi/status/1089609271250173952?s=21

[BD24]

Trump’s approval is down among suburban men, white evangelicals, and men without a college degree, all key segments of his constituency

:lol

[DMC]

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2019/01/trump-approval-polls-shutdown/581215/

Polls were wrong before. Why do people here act like 2016 never happened and that he was the favored candidate when Hillary was given 98% chance to win?

All these precursors have to lead to something, but pretending polls and MSM articles have a clue is useless. The portion of the country that doesn't reside in MSM hubs will decide. The liberal states are already given.

[Pavlov]

https://twitter.com/speakerpelosi/status/1089609271250173952?s=21Do you have a problem with this tweet, Chris?

Explain.

[Th'Pusher]

Polls were wrong before. Why do people here act like 2016 never happened and that he was the favored candidate when Hillary was given 98% chance to win?

All these precursors have to lead to something, but pretending polls and MSM articles have a clue is useless. The portion of the country that doesn't reside in MSM hubs will decide. The liberal states are already given.

Why are you acting like 2018 never happened? Republicans had a wildly favorable map and got their asses absolutely handed to them. Trump will lose in 2020 regardless of his opponent. I’ll bet any amount of money on it.

I don’t expect a no-take having pussy like you to take me up, but anyone willing to put $ on trump, I’m happy to take your money.

[ElNono]

You are assuming Trump really gives a shit about a wall actually getting built. This is just about cynical people on both sides playing to their political base. He can sign the spending bill and then invoke emergency funding.

I actually *do* think he doesn't give a shit. But like you said, it's a big egg on his face when it comes to his base, that's why he's going to play the tough guy game. Hopefully he wont overplay his hand like the last time.

[baseline bum]

You are assuming Trump really gives a shit about a wall actually getting built. This is just about cynical people on both sides playing to their political base. He can sign the spending bill and then invoke emergency funding.

Both sides? :lol

This is about Trump pretending to live up to a campaign promise he never intended to actually implement. He waited until the exact first moment that a wall couldn't be funded to demand it be funded. E.g., when senate Republicans were going home for Christmas with Pelosi and the Democrats about to take the House. He had three months to demand it be funded via a fiscal year 2019 reconciliation bill and there was nothing the Democrats could have done to stop it, just like there was nothing they could do to stop Trump's tax bill in fiscal year 2018. All he wanted was to pick a fight he could not win so he could play victim to his white nationalist base, and he didn't give a shit who he hurt in the process since middle and lower class federal workers mean nothing to him. He obviously never cared about illegal immigration since he loves hiring them.

[DMC]

Why are you acting like 2018 never happened? Republicans had a wildly favorable map and got their asses absolutely handed to them. Trump will lose in 2020 regardless of his opponent. I’ll bet any amount of money on it.

I don’t expect a no-take having pussy like you to take me up, but anyone willing to put $ on trump, I’m happy to take your money.

Your prediction isn't worth the time you took to type it. Really, what fuckin' good is it?
:lol notorious welching site.. no one ever pays a bet here.
:lol melting down

[DMX7]

:lol Cocaine Mitch
1088884848771678208

:wow she is taking names right now

[Th'Pusher]

Your prediction isn't worth the time you took to type it. Really, what fuckin' good is it?
:lol notorious welching site.. no one ever pays a bet here.
:lol melting down

So you think he has a chance?

:lol

Pussy

[Splits]

Polls were wrong before. Why do people here act like 2016 never happened and that he was the favored candidate when Hillary was given 98% chance to win?

All these precursors have to lead to something, but pretending polls and MSM articles have a clue is useless. The portion of the country that doesn't reside in MSM hubs will decide. The liberal states are already given.

So misinformed. 2016 national polls were within the margin of error. 538 gave him a 30% chance to win, like the best MLB hitters getting a hit or an NFL kicker missing a 43 yarder.

[DMC]

So misinformed. 2016 national polls were within the margin of error. 538 gave him a 30% chance to win, like the best MLB hitters getting a hit or an NFL kicker missing a 43 yarder.

He didn't win through RNG :lol

[DMC]

So you think he has a chance?

:lol

Pussy

Of course he has a chance. He's the incumbent.

:lol forum retard

[Will Hunting]

Of course he has a chance. He's the incumbent.

:lol forum retard
Just curious, I agree it’s retarded to claim he doesn’t have a chance, but would you consider him the favorite?

The electoral map just looks too daunting to call him the favorite imo. The three “blue wall” states he won all voted for a democratic governor in 2018, and the only state Hillary won that he appears to have a shot at winning is Minnesota, but that also voted heavily for a Democratic Governor. Florida also gets tougher for him with 1 million predominantly black felons now able to register to vote (I think we all know what political direction they lean), while Arizona looks like it could almost be a toss up because of how much the educated suburban female vote in that state seems to hate him.

[boutons_deux]

Trash will lose ...

... a huge majority of white women, as is typical for Repug assholes

... and increasingly serious chunk of Repug women disgusted by Trash

... the black vote, as is typical for Repug assholes

... slave states FL and VA, maybe others, have enfranchised ex-felons, most of whom are black

... ex-vangelicals,

... evangelicals who have realized electing Trash was not "what Christ would do"

... the increasingly large religious left (a superior brand of Christians)

... Hispanics/Latinos (if they would only vote)

... youth, as is typical for Repug assholes

... govt employees screwed by Trash, and associated people

RNC has already declared the Trash is their 2020 man, essentially aborting any challengers

However, Repug gerrymandering, counting fraud, voter suppression will be rampant, since cheating is the only way Repugs can win.

(If oligarchy's SCOTUS whores rule that partisan gerrymandering is Constitutional, there will be a gerrymandering orgy after the 2020 census.)

[Fabbs]

:lol Pelosi is really turning some of you Dem cucks on.

[DarrinS]

1089530472668061696

[Th'Pusher]

Of course he has a chance. He's the incumbent.

:lol forum retard

Don’t go too far out on a limb there with your ballsy take.

:lol

Pussy

[boutons_deux]

This trashing of Trash about his silly wall is probably Nancy peaking early.

Expect nothing much from her for two years.

[DMC]

Just curious, I agree it’s retarded to claim he doesn’t have a chance, but would you consider him the favorite?

It depends on who runs against him. Given the Dem's recent history and the fact that Hillary is still in the picture... I can't rule out that the old Dems try to run her again and backdoor other hopefuls.


The electoral map just looks too daunting to call him the favorite imo. The three “blue wall” states he won all voted for a democratic governor in 2018, and the only state Hillary won that he appears to have a shot at winning is Minnesota, but that also voted heavily for a Democratic Governor. Florida also gets tougher for him with 1 million predominantly black felons now able to register to vote (I think we all know what political direction they lean), while Arizona looks like it could almost be a toss up because of how much the educated suburban female vote in that state seems to hate him.

They vote governor for different reasons than they vote POTUS though. The mid terms are about local issues, I think.

Do you think Hillary could have won a governorship in her home state? If they run her again, that's what Donald has to beat.

[DMC]

Don’t go too far out on a limb there with your ballsy take.

:lol

Pussy

Calling you a retard isn't a risky take at all.

[DMC]

This is the actual truth but lying pieces of shit like that don’t work in truth and fact. The people that think for them give them their marching orders.

Shut your hog jowls and choke down that pulled pork sandwich you fat fuck

[Will Hunting]

It depends on who runs against him. Given the Dem's recent history and the fact that Hillary is still in the picture... I can't rule out that the old Dems try to run her again and backdoor other hopefuls.


They vote governor for different reasons than they vote POTUS though. The mid terms are about local issues, I think.

Do you think Hillary could have won a governorship in her home state? If they run her again, that's what Donald has to beat.
If Hillary ran and won the nomination again I’d agree Trump is the favorite but if that happens I’d probably move to Canada regardless of who wins the general election :lol

Lets say Biden wins the primary. Who would you think is the favorite in the general?

[baseline bum]

If Hillary ran and won the nomination again I’d agree Trump is the favorite but if that happens I’d probably move to Canada regardless of who wins the general election :lol

Lets say Biden wins the primary. Who would you think is the favorite in the general?

If Hillary wins the nomination I'd vote a straight ticket GOP ballot.

[Pavlov]

If Hillary wins the nomination I'd vote a straight ticket GOP ballot.:lol I understand the sentiment. Only tangentially related, but better point guard than Borowitz....

I AM SO PROGRESSIVE THAT I AM ALREADY PREPARING MY 2020 PROTEST VOTE FOR DONALD TRUMP
1089924815379558400

[Th'Pusher]

Calling you a retard isn't a risky take at all.

It’s well established you’re incapable of offering any substantial opinions, much less a risky one.

:lol @ clinging to the idea the democrats will run Hillary in 2020. That’s a perfect example of a low value shit take. Thanks for proving the point.

[DMC]

If Hillary ran and won the nomination again I’d agree Trump is the favorite but if that happens I’d probably move to Canada regardless of who wins the general election :lol

Lets say Biden wins the primary. Who would you think is the favorite in the general?

Biden beats Trump. Could have beaten him last time.

[DMC]

It’s well established you’re incapable of offering any substantial opinions, much less a risky one.

:lol @ clinging to the idea the democrats will run Hillary in 2020. That’s a perfect example of a low value shit take. Thanks for proving the point.

They haven't proven they won't. She's still a Clinton. Pretending these new niggas in town are somehow able to overcome the Clinton power machine in the DNC is hilarious.

[Th'Pusher]

They haven't proven they won't. She's still a Clinton. Pretending these new niggas in town are somehow able to overcome the Clinton power machine in the DNC is hilarious.

You don’t believe that. GTFO here with that low value shit.

[Spurminator]

A losing Presidential candidate from a major party has won that party's nomination for the following campaign only once in the past 120 years... Thomas Dewey, who lost to FDR the first time and ran against Truman the second time.

It would be very unusual for Clinton to be nominated again, historically speaking.

[Pavlov]

A losing Presidential candidate from a major party has won that party's nomination for the following campaign only once in the past 120 years... Thomas Dewey, who lost to FDR the first time and ran against Truman the second time.

It would be very unusual for Clinton to be nominated again, historically speaking.Didn't Adlai Stevenson do the same against Eisenhower?

[DMC]

You don’t believe that. GTFO here with that low value shit.

You do though. That's what bothers you.

[DMC]

A losing Presidential candidate from a major party has won that party's nomination for the following campaign only once in the past 120 years... Thomas Dewey, who lost to FDR the first time and ran against Truman the second time.

It would be very unusual for Clinton to be nominated again, historically speaking.

How many of those campaigns were the cards stacked in favor of said candidate by their own party against other potential candidates of same said party?

[Th'Pusher]

You really are a special type of poster.

It takes nothing special to point out what a shitty take Hillary 2020 is. As you can tell by the responses itt, nobody is buying your bullshit.

[DMC]

It takes nothing special to point out what a shitty take Hillary 2020 is. As you can tell by the responses itt, nobody is buying your bullshit.

The fact that you're deathly afraid of the candidate YOU ran. That's enough for me.

[Th'Pusher]

The fact that you're deathly afraid of the candidate YOU ran. That's enough for me.

:lol I have no fear she’ll be the democratic nominee. I think you hope that she will be the nominee and you let that emotion color your shitty takes.

[DMC]

:lol I have no fear she’ll be the democratic nominee. I think you hope that she will be the nominee and you let that emotion color your shitty takes.

I'd like to see a good candidate. Unlike you I'll take a country win over a party win.

[Th'Pusher]

I'd like to see a good candidate. Unlike you I'll take a country win over a party win.

Great. Who would you consider to be a good candidate?

[Spurminator]

Didn't Adlai Stevenson do the same against Eisenhower?

You're right. Twice, then.

Oops.

[Spurminator]

How many of those campaigns were the cards stacked in favor of said candidate by their own party against other potential candidates of same said party?

Probably a lot of them, TBH. But neither of us knows the inner workings from campaigns prior to party communications being hacked.

[Pavlov]

You're right. Twice, then.

Oops.Don't worry, I forgot about Dewey.

Grover Cleveland did it with Stevenson's father as his VP. So there.

Not a great track record anyway.

[DarrinS]

People shitting bricks at the possibility of another Hillary run. :lmao

Not with her anymore

[Th'Pusher]

People shitting bricks at the possibility of another Hillary run. :lmao

Not with her anymore

Nobody is shitting bricks because no one, outside of DMC, thinks she’ll get the nomination.

[DarrinS]

Nobody is shitting bricks because no one, outside of DMC, thinks she’ll get the nomination.

She only got it last time because the field was so weak. Lol, three randos and Bernie.

[Pavlov]

It was her "turn" and everyone thought she would win. I don't think most feel that way anymore.

[Will Hunting]

She only got it last time because the field was so weak. Lol, three randos and Bernie.
The randos were all has beens too, it’s not like any of them were considered to be rising stars.

[DarrinS]

The randos were all has beens too, it’s not like any of them were considered to be rising stars.

When I saw the debates, I didn't even know who they were, tbh.

[Will Hunting]

When I saw the debates, I didn't even know who they were, tbh.
All I knew about Martin O’Malley is that the character Tommy Carcetti in The Wire was based off of him :lol

[FrostKing]

She only got it last time because the field was so weak. Lol, three randos and Bernie.
I don't believe she was such an awful candidate. Her mistakes were not campaigning on the road and being a bit snotty towards certain demographics (but that tends to be a quality of Dems).

IMO the timing was awful - people wanted change/anti establishment and Hillary was far from it. Okay Ill add another mistake of hers: she tried to be too many versions to too many groups/people and it eventually came off not genuine

[DMC]

Great. Who would you consider to be a good candidate?

I'll know when it when I see it.

[DMC]

Probably a lot of them, TBH. But neither of us knows the inner workings from campaigns prior to party communications being hacked.

Also how many are wives of former presidents? And is there even one with the power the Clintons have in the DNC?

[DMC]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/01/28/hillary-clinton-advisers-keep-floating-another-run-it-would-be-nearly-unprecedented-modern-political-era/?utm_term=.06de646cfe2f

[Th'Pusher]

I'll know when it when I see it.

Awesome shitpost :tu

[Spurminator]

Also how many are wives of former presidents? And is there even one with the power the Clintons have in the DNC?

I don't think "wife of former President" was a big selling point before 1980. But plenty of former VP's and other cabinet members have run for President and lost. How many have lost as embarrassingly as Hillary Clinton?

There's no way to quantify this power you suggest the Clintons have over the DNC (and you do realize that party leadership was completely turned over after 2016, right?) nor to measure it against influence previous candidates might have had within the committee. It's hard to believe that 2016 was unique with respect to party leaders having a favored candidate for their party's nomination. I imagine it's fairly common.

[Will Hunting]

Also how many are wives of former presidents? And is there even one with the power the Clintons have in the DNC?
They got too brazen with how much they controlled the primary process in 2016 (and also how much they bankrupted the DNC) and there's been backlash because of it, they don't have the power they had 2 years ago. Any power they still have will be used in more subtle ways, this time around candidates are going to be doing everything they can to be as far away from Hillary as possible. The mere fact candidates like Warren and Biden are entering the race is enough to know that this won't be another primary where Hillary is crammed down everyone's throat. What's a big possibility is the Clintons taking a likable younger candidate like Beto who's views are largely unknown to the public and doing with him what they did with Obama in 08 after it was clear he'd beat Hillary (throw their support and resources behind him as long as he fills his cabinet with their people and supports the corporatist agenda that the Clintons support).

Either way, it's a delusional right wing pipe dream to think Hillary has any shot at winning the primary. In every poll I've seen she had 5% of the vote or less, and she's not a candidate who's going to gain support between now and when primary voting actually starts. People have always liked her less and less as they see more and more of her, her popularity was at its highest in 2013 and 2014 when she was neither in office nor actively campaigning :lol. In spite of having all the advantages she had in 2016, 40% of the primary voters ended up voting for a Socialist who's name was barely known outside of the Northeast prior to the primary.

The more I think about it I'd actually want her to run. The only people who'd vote for her are the low information black voters or middle aged women, so she'd theoretically make it more difficult for some shitty candidate like Harris or Booker to win the primary by carrying the black vote or some other shitty candidate like Gillibrand.

[DMC]

Awesome shitpost :tu

I will not be pawed at

[Th'Pusher]

I will not be pawed at

How is me asking you who you’d consider to ba a good candidate after you suggested you wanted a good candidate me pawing at you?

In any event the work has been done here. Everyone agrees that your Hillary 2020 pipe dream is low value shitpost.

Go back to the drawing board DMC. You shit your pants pretty thoroughly itt.

[DMC]

How is me asking you who you’d consider to ba a good candidate after you suggested you wanted a good candidate me pawing at you?

In any event the work has been done here. Everyone agrees that your Hillary 2020 pipe dream is low value shitpost.

Go back to the drawing board DMC. You shit your pants pretty thoroughly itt.

You are not my inquisitor.

[Th'Pusher]

You are not my inquisitor.

Ok. But you’re a low value shitposter.

[DMC]

Ok. But you’re a low value shitposter.

Maybe that's why I live in your head rent free.

[Th'Pusher]

Maybe that's why I live in your head rent free.

Solid post.

[Pavlov]

lol DodgeMC

[Spurtacular]

Either way, it's a delusional right wing pipe dream to think Hillary has any shot at winning the primary.

That's putting it in terms that suit you. We're acknowledging certain realities that make it quite possible if not likely that she'll give it a go.

[Will Hunting]

That's putting it in terms that suit you. We're acknowledging certain realities that make it quite possible if not likely that she'll give it a go.
Her giving it a go is a possibility, I was speaking to the possibility of her winning the primary. It has absolutely no shot at happening.

[Th'Pusher]

That's putting it in terms that suit you. We're acknowledging certain realities that make it quite possible if not likely that she'll give it a go.

This is great company you keep DMC.

:lol

[Spurtacular]

Her giving it a go is a possibility, I was speaking to the possibility of her winning the primary. It has absolutely no shot at happening.

Yea, I just saw I misread it. I don't look at it in terms of percent at this point. Too many variables. One point would be that Democratic animosity towards her can soften; and many leftists still romanticize having a woman in office. While I probably have her behind Biden, Bernie and Beto at this point, momentum cannot be discounted. It's too early to really say.

[Spurtacular]

This is great company you keep DMC.

:lol

I haven't kept up with your squabble. You'll have to explain that.

[Will Hunting]

Yea, I just saw I misread it. I don't look at it in terms of percent at this point. Too many variables. One point would be that Democratic animosity towards her can soften; and many leftists still romanticize having a woman in office. While I probably have her behind Biden, Bernie and Beto at this point, momentum cannot be discounted. It's too early to really say.
The leftists are the ones who hate her the most. The polls also say she’s behind a lot more than the group you just listed. I saw a recent poll that had her dead even with Oprah Winfrey at 1%.

Also, as I mentioned earlier ITT, she’s the opposite of a candidate who can overcome a huge deficit in the polls and win on momentum. Her campaigns have always lost steam as the progress because of how awful she is making appearances on the campaign trail. Candidates who can overcome huge deficits and build momentum are more energetic types who typically do stuff like public speaking a lot better than Hillary does (ie Obama or Beto). The only way she’s ever won major races is by beating people into submission with name recognition and being able to start the campaign with a giant advantage.

[Spurtacular]

The leftists are the ones who hate her the most. The polls also say she’s behind a lot more than the group you just listed. I saw a recent poll that had her dead even with Oprah Winfrey at 1%.


Fake poll, imo.

[FrostKing]

They got too brazen with how much they controlled the primary process in 2016 (and also how much they bankrupted the DNC) and there's been backlash because of it, they don't have the power they had 2 years ago. Any power they still have will be used in more subtle ways, this time around candidates are going to be doing everything they can to be as far away from Hillary as possible. The mere fact candidates like Warren and Biden are entering the race is enough to know that this won't be another primary where Hillary is crammed down everyone's throat. What's a big possibility is the Clintons taking a likable younger candidate like Beto who's views are largely unknown to the public and doing with him what they did with Obama in 08 after it was clear he'd beat Hillary (throw their support and resources behind him as long as he fills his cabinet with their people and supports the corporatist agenda that the Clintons support).

Either way, it's a delusional right wing pipe dream to think Hillary has any shot at winning the primary. In every poll I've seen she had 5% of the vote or less, and she's not a candidate who's going to gain support between now and when primary voting actually starts. People have always liked her less and less as they see more and more of her, her popularity was at its highest in 2013 and 2014 when she was neither in office nor actively campaigning :lol. In spite of having all the advantages she had in 2016, 40% of the primary voters ended up voting for a Socialist who's name was barely known outside of the Northeast prior to the primary.

The more I think about it I'd actually want her to run. The only people who'd vote for her are the low information black voters or middle aged women, so she'd theoretically make it more difficult for some shitty candidate like Harris or Booker to win the primary by carrying the black vote or some other shitty candidate like Gillibrand.
Don't be such an incel. Hillary would be a legitimate candidate to break the barrier

[Will Hunting]

Fake poll, imo.
What poll are you looking at?

[Spurtacular]

Also, as I mentioned earlier ITT, she’s the opposite of a candidate who can overcome a huge deficit in the polls and win on momentum. Her campaigns have always lost steam as the progress because of how awful she is making appearances on the campaign trail. Candidates who can overcome huge deficits and build momentum are more energetic types who typically do stuff like public speaking a lot better than Hillary does (ie Obama or Beto). The only way she’s ever won major races is by beating people into submission with name recognition and being able to start the campaign with a giant advantage.

Biden is the only one who rivals her in political "prestige". I don't disagree that the hardcore lefties are more for Beto or Bernie; but then again, both of them running could split the vote and help her. And Biden is not a sure thing at this point cos isn't he pushing 80 or something? Granted, he's probably in better health than her. I'm not talking about her having a grass roots momentum; but there's no doubt she has plenty of loyal followers still. There's no doubt that she doesn't have connections and can garner support if she starts to look like a front runner. Mind you, I'm speaking of her as a dark horse at this point. But sometimes dark horses win the prize. There are plenty of Dems that don't want Commie Cuck or Fake Mexican and want "resume". It's just too early to start discounting her chances. I think her chances of winning the Dem primaries are frankly better than winning a presidential election in which Trump very favorably contrasts against her.

[Spurtacular]

What poll are you looking at?

Any pretend poll that has Hillary at one percent.

[Will Hunting]

Biden is the only one who rivals her in political "prestige". I don't disagree that the hardcore lefties are more for Beto or Bernie; but then again, both of them running could split the vote and help her. And Biden is not a sure thing at this point cos isn't he pushing 80 or something? Granted, he's probably in better health than her. I'm not talking about her having a grass roots momentum; but there's no doubt she has plenty of loyal followers still. There's no doubt that she doesn't have connections and can garner support if she starts to look like a front runner. Mind you, I'm speaking of her as a dark horse at this point. But sometimes dark horses win the prize. There are plenty of Dems that don't want Commie Cuck or Fake Mexican and want "resume". It's just too early to start discounting her chances. I think her chances of winning the Dem primaries are frankly better than winning a presidential election in which Trump very favorably contrasts against her.
Where do you base the assertion that she still has plenty of loyal followers? I haven’t seen any polling supporting that.

Youre also ignoring all of the other candidates and pretending she’s only running against two old men and a fake Mexican. Harris/Booker will make it so she’s won’t be able to sleep walk her way to the black vote anymore, Warren will take most of the “we want a woman!” vote from Hillary, and I’m only scratching the surface. It’s an extremely crowded field which makes it so bland centrists like Hillary who don’t have any fanatics struggle to find a base.

[Will Hunting]

Any pretend poll that has Hillary at one percent.
I’m asking what polling data you’re using. I’m curious as to what polls have Hillary getting anything at this point.

[Spurtacular]

Where do you base the assertion that she still has plenty of loyal followers? I haven’t seen any polling supporting that.

Youre also ignoring all of the other candidates and pretending she’s only running against two old men and a fake Mexican. Harris/Booker will make it so she’s won’t be able to sleep walk her way to the black vote anymore, Warren will take most of the “we want a woman!” vote from Hillary, and I’m only scratching the surface. It’s an extremely crowded field which makes it so bland centrists like Hillary who don’t have any fanatics struggle to find a base.

:lol That you believe polls and haven't figured out that they're establishment projections at this point. Or do you really think that Hillary went from "popular vote getter" to one percent while not being embroiled in any new scandals?

Harris/Booker are pretenders. It's like giving the Heat a chance of making the Finals. It's not going to happen. In fact, that's overstating it, cos I doubt they'll even win a state; they're more akin to a team that who has the faintest of chances of making the playoffs even.

Warren is Hillary Zero; she won't be siphoning many votes.

Crowded doesn't mean a thing. There's four serious contenders. The rest will drop off quickly.

[Splits]

https://twitter.com/thedavidcrosby/status/1090423801672740865

[FrostKing]

https://twitter.com/thedavidcrosby/status/1090423801672740865
https://i.ibb.co/YWHwZZQ/Screenshot-2019-01-29-23-40-58-1.png


> Barbra's $100 MILLION home
https://starmap.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/timthumb-49.jpg

> Barbra supporting segregation
https://i.ibb.co/3RwGs02/Screenshot-2019-01-29-23-46-30-1.png

> Barbra visiting the Western Wall
https://images.haarets.co.il/image/fetch/w_640,q_auto,c_fill,f_auto/fl_any_format.preserve_transparency.progressive:no ne/https://www.haaretz.com/polopoly_fs/1.5537005.1514723664!/image/1018316866.jpg

[Will Hunting]

:lol That you believe polls and haven't figured out that they're establishment projections at this point. Or do you really think that Hillary went from "popular vote getter" to one percent while not being embroiled in any new scandals?

Harris/Booker are pretenders. It's like giving the Heat a chance of making the Finals. It's not going to happen. In fact, that's overstating it, cos I doubt they'll even win a state; they're more akin to a team that who has the faintest of chances of making the playoffs even.

Warren is Hillary Zero; she won't be siphoning many votes.

Crowded doesn't mean a thing. There's four serious contenders. The rest will drop off quickly.
I’ll happily bet that Hillary either doesn’t run or runs, only gets <10% of the popular vote, and wins <3 states. You in?

[Spurtacular]

I’ll happily bet that Hillary either doesn’t run or runs, only gets <10% of the popular vote, and wins <3 states. You in?

You'd likely lose the first one, imo. She only won't go for it for health reasons, tbh. Her performance is iffy of course. That's why I have her preliminarily ranked fourth.

[BD24]

You'd likely lose the first one, imo. She only won't go for it for health reasons, tbh. Her performance is iffy of course. That's why I have her preliminarily ranked fourth.
Look at this pussy backing down when pressed :lol

[Spurtacular]

Look at this pussy backing down when pressed :lol

I don't have any need to do personal bets with anyone on ST. Never have, never will. You're bitter, bruh.

[BD24]

I don't have any need to do personal bets with anyone on ST. Never have, never will. You're bitter, bruh.
Look at this pussy backing down.

[CosmicCowboy]

I have never seen anyone actually pay a bet on here and there have been plenty of welchers.

[SpursforSix]

I have never seen anyone actually pay a bet on here and there have been plenty of welchers.

I've paid the one bet I made on here. To DD I think. Anyway...what do you want to bet one?

[spurraider21]

I have never seen anyone actually pay a bet on here and there have been plenty of welchers.
midnightpulp is good with bets

fkla as well

deadlydynasty, chunticakes ...

[Splits]

I have never seen anyone actually pay a bet on here and there have been plenty of welchers.
midnightpulp and i have had several bets over the years, and neither he nor I have ever welched. I also lost $100 bet to @apasolic_9 and paid

[Spurtacular]

Look at this pussy backing down.

I don't do bets with people on ST. This triggers you.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/DailyCaller/status/1090741344295940096

[Spurs Homer]

https://twitter.com/DailyCaller/status/1090741344295940096

Why would the GOP simultaneously defend Trumps sexual assaults - and then turn around and try to enact punitive measures against Federal employees who are sexual offenders like trump?

[Chris]

Why would the GOP simultaneously defend Trumps sexual assaults - and then turn around and try to enact punitive measures against Federal employees who are sexual offenders like trump?

I don't speak for the GOP.

List all of Trump's sexual assaults.

[Spurs Homer]

I don't speak for the GOP.

List all of Trump's sexual assaults.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_sexual_misconduct_allegations

[CosmicCowboy]

I am actually starting to feel sorry for Pelosi. She finally gets the speakership back just when her dementia is becoming painfully obvious.

_z32BL1KEhU

[MultiTroll]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_sexual_misconduct_allegations
"Disciplined for sexual misconduct" does not equal "allegations".

[Pavlov]

I am actually starting to feel sorry for Pelosi. She finally gets the speakership back just when her dementia is becoming painfully obvious.

_z32BL1KEhUlol who sent you that link?

[CosmicCowboy]

lol who sent you that link?

nobody sent it. Why?

[TSA]

I have never seen anyone actually pay a bet on here and there have been plenty of welchers.

Koolaid Man paid me.

[Pavlov]

nobody sent it. Why?Oh, where did it show up?

[spurraider21]

he's obviously subscribed to "The American Mirror" channel on youtube

[CosmicCowboy]

Oh, where did it show up?

Meh. drudge linked it. Why the big deal?

[Pavlov]

Meh. drudge linked it. Why the big deal?lol ask Darrin

[DMX7]

Nancy is really triggering some snowflakes nowadays.

[DMC]

She just seems tired. Doing pretty good for a woman her age.

[Winehole23]

If Trump said the same about himself, it would be a lie.

[Winehole23]

Trump fucked himself hard, and so did the schemers he brought along. They ran a presidential campaign as a prank and won by accident, so they got their dicks all caught in a crack.

[Winehole23]

Had Trump lost, he'd have created a media company railing against HRC 24/7 and no one would be the wiser.

[Winehole23]

But he fucked up and won.

[Chris]

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi Invites Planned Parenthood President Leana Wen to State of the Union



Planned Parenthood called Wen’s attendance at the State of the Union address “significant at a time when women’s reproductive rights are under constant threat.”

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/laurettabrown/2019/02/05/house-speaker-nancy-pelosi-invites-planned-parenthood-president-leana-wen-as-her-sotu-guest-n2540842

[CosmicCowboy]

But he fucked up and won.

I think Trump was as surprised as we were when he won.

[boutons_deux]

Speaker Pelosi wore a symbol of her authority on her lapel. (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/2/5/1832627/-Speaker-Pelosi-wore-a-symbol-of-her-authority-on-her-lapel)


https://images.dailykos.com/images/640758/story_image/GettyImages-1094205800.jpg?1549422096

a representation of the Mace of the Republic, or the Mace of the US House of Representatives.

The mace is modeled on an ancient weapon of the same name (think of an iron club).

House rules indicate that the speaker may direct the Sergeant at Arms to lift the mace and present it before an offender, to restore order to the House.

While history has no record that it has ever been used to actually club down the disorderly,

it has been removed from its pedestal a dozen or more times and held in front of offending lawmakers by the House sergeant-at-arms.

So great is the respect for it as a symbol of law and order that order was restored each time.

It was used twice in the 1890's in incidents involving Representative Charles L. Bartlett, a fiery Georgia Democrat who hurled a volume of laws at one colleague and brandished a knife at another.

House records indicate that the mace was last used to restore order during World War I when Representative J. Thomas (Cotton Tom) Heflin of Alabama, uncle of that state's current Senator, Howell Heflin, suggested that some of his colleagues had been unpatriotic in voting against a resolution to enter the war.


https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/2/5/1832627/-Speaker-Pelosi-wore-a-symbol-of-her-authority-on-her-lapel?utm_campaign=trending

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/ChuckCallesto/status/1096890029530640386

[Fabbs]

^

Nancy is soo alpha.

[DMX7]

Speaker Pelosi wore a symbol of her authority on her lapel. (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/2/5/1832627/-Speaker-Pelosi-wore-a-symbol-of-her-authority-on-her-lapel)


https://images.dailykos.com/images/640758/story_image/GettyImages-1094205800.jpg?1549422096

a representation of the Mace of the Republic, or the Mace of the US House of Representatives.

The mace is modeled on an ancient weapon of the same name (think of an iron club).

House rules indicate that the speaker may direct the Sergeant at Arms to lift the mace and present it before an offender, to restore order to the House.

While history has no record that it has ever been used to actually club down the disorderly,

it has been removed from its pedestal a dozen or more times and held in front of offending lawmakers by the House sergeant-at-arms.

So great is the respect for it as a symbol of law and order that order was restored each time.

It was used twice in the 1890's in incidents involving Representative Charles L. Bartlett, a fiery Georgia Democrat who hurled a volume of laws at one colleague and brandished a knife at another.

House records indicate that the mace was last used to restore order during World War I when Representative J. Thomas (Cotton Tom) Heflin of Alabama, uncle of that state's current Senator, Howell Heflin, suggested that some of his colleagues had been unpatriotic in voting against a resolution to enter the war.


https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/2/5/1832627/-Speaker-Pelosi-wore-a-symbol-of-her-authority-on-her-lapel?utm_campaign=trending

what a BOSS!

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/thebradfordfile/status/1097680823501967361

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/Circa/status/1099339036995604480

She looks drunk.