ST Democrats: Who do you want to win the 2020 Nomination?

[ChumpDumper]

:cry But write me an essay :cryYou're whining.

If you can't do it just say so.

How does the Fed cause problems as you claim?


Please explain in your own words without whining or trying to change the subject or making up poker rules for a simple discussion.

Either answer or say you can't answer.

[Spurtacular]

You're whining.

If you can't do it just say so.

How does the Fed cause problems as you claim?


Please explain in your own words without whining or trying to change the subject or making up poker rules for a simple discussion.

Either answer or say you can't answer.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnLk7dbDWlI

[ChumpDumper]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnLk7dbDWlIOK, you can't answer.

I accept your white flag forever on this subject.

lol derp

[Spurtacular]

OK, you can't answer.

I accept your white flag forever on this subject.

lol derp

I accept you have no Jacobs to lose.

[CosmicCowboy]

Actually I do. But I don’t have any desire to having a pissing contest with you about my education and your lack thereof. You’ve already proven that you’re unable to admit when you’re wrong so I can’t really see any benefit of trying to help you learn anything. It took days to convince you that cows fart. I can’t imagine how long it would take to help you understand economics. I’d have to start with analogies about Luann Platters.

Lots of words to just wave a white flag. Surrender accepted.

[Pavlov]

I accept you have no Jacobs to lose.huh?

I asked you a simple question about your claim.

You shit yourself.

End of story.

lol derp

[Spurtacular]

huh?

I asked you a simple question about your claim.

You shit yourself.

End of story.

lol derp

:cry I didn't watch an 18 second video :cry

:lmao No Manhood Chump

[Pavlov]

:cry I didn't watch an 18 second video :cry

:lmao No Manhood ChumpIf you can't do it just say so.

How does the Fed cause problems as you claim?


Please explain in your own words without whining or trying to change the subject or making up poker rules for a simple discussion.

Either answer or say you can't answer.

[Spurtacular]

If you can't do it just say so.

How does the Fed cause problems as you claim?


Please explain in your own words without whining or trying to change the subject or making up poker rules for a simple discussion.

Either answer or say you can't answer.

You had an epic tantrum there, sport. Now you're just tuckered out.

[Pavlov]

You had an epic tantrum there, sport. Now you're just tuckered out.I asked you a simple question.

Just answer it or say you can't.

[Spurtacular]

I asked you a simple question.

Just answer it or say you can't.

:lol that you're too socially retarded to watch an 18 second video.

[Pavlov]

:lol that you're too socially retarded to watch an 18 second video.
That isn't your answering in your own words.

You can't do it.

That's fine.

[Spurtacular]

That isn't your answering in your own words.

You can't do it.

That's fine.

Still throwing your tantrum. :lol

[Pavlov]

Still throwing your tantrum. :lol:lol still completely unable to answer a simple question about a claim you made.

derp

[Spurtacular]

:lol still completely unable to answer a simple question about a claim you made.

derp

You got your bone, bitch. I don't need to hear how it tastes.

[Pavlov]

You got your bone, bitch. I don't need to hear how it tastes.
You can't answer a simple question about a claim you made.

Live with it and stop whining.

[Spurtacular]

You can't answer a simple question about a claim you made.

Live with it and stop whining.

You jump in harping on the trivial and think I'm supposed to care when you throw your tantrum. :lmao
Par. :lmao

[ChumpDumper]

You jump in harping on the trivialNo, I asked you directly about your claim.

All you've done is shit yourself.

Go back into your fetal position.

[CosmicCowboy]

Looks like the press is beginning to turn on Beto, and "Mayor Pete" is the new golden boy. Nothing but positive fluff pieces lately.

[Will Hunting]

Looks like the press is beginning to turn on Beto, and "Mayor Pete" is the new golden boy. Nothing but positive fluff pieces lately.
The process of speed dating all of the candidates who haven't been in politics long enough to have a real track record is now fully underway. I'm sure it'll be a few weeks until we find out about skeletons in Buttigeg's (if I spelled that wrong, I don't care) closet and the media will move onto a new darling upstart candidate. There's not a chance that guy has any real shot at winning the primary, and he'd get smoked by Trump in a general.

[Will Hunting]

I would basically group all of the candidates into these buckets, with the first three buckets having a huge advantage:

1) The candidates who actually have a progressive track record prior to 2016 but don't have the personality a presidential candidate needs:
Sanders
Warren

2) The establishment candidate who doesn't even try to pretend he's a progressive but might still win because he has the one thing your average Democratic primary voter looks for, celebrity status and name recognition:
Biden
O'Rourke

3) The female establishment senator who wants to rebrand herself as a progressive despite being a Clinton supporter 4 years ago and having floods of special interest money:
Harris
Klobuchar
Gillibrand

4) The seasoned ex-governor who might actually be a good candidate but doesn't have the name recognition/celebrity status that most superficial Democratic primary voters look for:
John Hickenlooper
Steve Bullock
Jay Inslee

5) The minority who people saw as a trendy future candidate 4+ years ago but hasn't done anything recently to excite voters:
Castro
Booker
Holder (already announced he wasn't running)

6) The young and inexperienced house liberal who's running way too soon:
Tulsi Gabbard
Tim Ryan
Eric Swallwell
Seth Moulton

After that, it's pretty much a hodgepodge of unknowns who hope to create appeal by being the guy no one has ever fucking heard of.

[CosmicCowboy]

O'Rourke is certainly pretending to be a progressive, despite basically having no record as a congressman.

[Spurtacular]

No, I asked you directly about your claim.

All you've done is shit yourself.

Go back into your fetal position.

You still crying?

[Pavlov]

You still crying?:lol you're still in the fetal position.

[boutons_deux]

6) The young and inexperienced house liberal who's running way too soon:
Tulsi Gabbard


... ain't no liberal, no progressive

[Chris]

Alec Baldwin: "Beating Trump would be so easy"

:lol

[Spurtacular]

:lol you're still in the fetal position.

You had an epic meltdown. :clap

[Spurtacular]

I would basically group all of the candidates into these buckets, with the first three buckets having a huge advantage:

1) The candidates who actually have a progressive track record prior to 2016 but don't have the personality a presidential candidate needs:
Sanders
Warren

2) The establishment candidate who doesn't even try to pretend he's a progressive but might still win because he has the one thing your average Democratic primary voter looks for, celebrity status and name recognition:
Biden
O'Rourke

3) The female establishment senator who wants to rebrand herself as a progressive despite being a Clinton supporter 4 years ago and having floods of special interest money:
Harris
Klobuchar
Gillibrand

4) The seasoned ex-governor who might actually be a good candidate but doesn't have the name recognition/celebrity status that most superficial Democratic primary voters look for:
John Hickenlooper
Steve Bullock
Jay Inslee

5) The minority who people saw as a trendy future candidate 4+ years ago but hasn't done anything recently to excite voters:
Castro
Booker
Holder (already announced he wasn't running)

6) The young and inexperienced house liberal who's running way too soon:
Tulsi Gabbard
Tim Ryan
Eric Swallwell
Seth Moulton

After that, it's pretty much a hodgepodge of unknowns who hope to create appeal by being the guy no one has ever fucking heard of.

Good write-up except for O'Rourke. He has taken on the progressive stances fairly consistently in the last year or so.

[Will Hunting]

Good write-up except for O'Rourke. He has taken on the progressive stances fairly consistently in the last year or so.
Yeah that’s fair, he’s kinda on his own island as someone with a fuckload of name recognition despite being so inexperienced. He probably fits more with the Harris/Gillibrand type as an establishment Dem trying to be seen as a progressive.

[Spurtacular]

Yeah that’s fair, he’s kinda on his own island as someone with a fuckload of name recognition despite being so inexperienced. He probably fits more with the Harris/Gillibrand type as an establishment Dem trying to be seen as a progressive.

Really just a point of order for me. I :lol that so many Dems are buying that this goober is cool.

[Will Hunting]

Really just a point of order for me. I :lol that so many Dems are buying that this goober is cool.
The cool seems to be wearing off. He should have stuck to running for senate to limit the scrutiny he would get.

[Spurtacular]

The cool seems to be wearing off. He should have stuck to running for senate to limit the scrutiny he would get.

He might as well push all his chips into the middle and hope it works. I don't see that he has much to lose.

[koriwhat]

He might as well push all his chips into the middle and hope it works. I don't see that he has much to lose.

if he swings his arms around more chaotically and run out of breathe at a higher rate then he might inch closer to winning at top golf.

[Pavlov]

You had an epic meltdown. :clapSorry. I asked you a simple question.

You didn't answer it. All you've done is whine.

Sorry, derp. I didn't mean to destroy you. Just wanted to know what you meant.

[Will Hunting]

He might as well push all his chips into the middle and hope it works. I don't see that he has much to lose.
The whole thing he did for several months after losing to Cruz where he went around the country and left his wife at home to handle their young children was weird.

[koriwhat]

I didn't mean to destroy you.

you've destroyed no one here in any capacity whatsoever pav. you're just stroking that weak ego of yours because no one else will.

[koriwhat]

The whole thing he did for several months after losing to Cruz where he went around the country and left his wife at home to handle their young children was weird.

his wife ain't handling shit with all them millions in the bank. she has some illegal taking care of them runts tbh.

[Spurtacular]

The whole thing he did for several months after losing to Cruz where he went around the country and left his wife at home to handle their young children was weird.

How so?

[Spurtacular]

https://rlv.zcache.com/meltdown_in_progress_please_stand_back_t_shirt-r163f6fdff861480ea21f0ad6b5480241_k2gg9_307.jpg?rv type=content

[Pavlov]

you've destroyed no one here in any capacity whatsoever pav. you're just stroking that weak ego of yours because no one else will.What was derp's answer to my question?

[Pavlov]

:lmao derp, why do you never back up any claim you've ever made here?

[Spurtacular]

https://www.swinomishcasinoandlodge.com/includes/class.timthumb.php?src=/ecom_img/original-133-113-mega-meltdown.jpg&zc=2&w=610&h=380

[Pavlov]

:lol derp still trying desperately to not answer a simple question.

[DarrinS]

Piss battle. Remember, don't cross streams.

:lmao

[Pavlov]

Piss battle. Remember, don't cross streams.

:lmao:lmao Darrin never fails to comment just like he never fails to defend Trump.

[Spurtacular]

Piss battle. Remember, don't cross streams.

:lmao

Not really. You can trace back Chump's tantrum days and pages even though I've given zero fucks. :lmao

[Pavlov]

Not really. You can trace back Chump's tantrum days and pages even though I've given zero fucks. :lmao:lol you've responded every time with all your excuses, conditions and distractions.

If you gave zero fucks you would simply ignore me.

[Spurtacular]

:lol you've responded every time with all your excuses, conditions and distractions.

If you gave zero fucks you would simply ignore me.

:cry Your musings validate me and muh tantrums :cry

:lmao

[Pavlov]

:cry Your musings validate me and muh tantrums :cry

:lmao:lol you're still replying and giving a fuck.

Now do it again....

[Spurtacular]

:lol you're still replying and giving a fuck.

Now do it again....

I mean if you wanna argue that I give a fuck about providing the platform for you to look like a raving lunatic....

:lmao

[koriwhat]

What was derp's answer to my question?

i simply made a statement about you and your ego. idgaf what you ask of me. :tu

[Pavlov]

I mean if you wanna argue that I give a fuck about providing the platform for you to look like a raving lunatic....

:lmaoYou give a fuck about what I post because you're replying and making excuses for yourself.

Sorry derp.

If you didn't give a fuck you wouldn't be replying.

Period.

Your next reply will prove you give a fuck.

[koriwhat]

You give a fuck about what I post because you're replying and making excuses for yourself.

Sorry derp.

If you didn't give a fuck you wouldn't be replying.

Period.

Your next reply will prove you give a fuck.

leave him be, stay out of his notifications, and maybe then he wouldn't "reply" to you. check your ego pav! you're a small man with an ego that's out of this world but only on the internet. :lmao

[Pavlov]

leave him be, stay out of his notifications, and maybe then he wouldn't "reply" to you. check your ego pav! you're a small man with an ego that's out of this world but only on the internet. :lmao:lmao another dipshit who simply can't ignore someone.

You have no willpower, tough guy.

Mexican Thunderdome taught you nohting.

[Spurtacular]

You give a fuck about what I post because you're replying and making excuses for yourself.

Sorry derp.

If you didn't give a fuck you wouldn't be replying.

Period.

Your next reply will prove you give a fuck.

:cry You validating me gives me carte blanche to throw my tantrums :cry

[Pavlov]

:cry You validating me gives me carte blanche to throw my tantrums :cryYou're not validating anything but your continued interest in me and my posts, derp.

Now show you give a fuck again by responding to this post.

[koriwhat]

:lmao another dipshit who simply can't ignore someone.

You have no willpower, tough guy.

you blow my notifications up daily... you have no will power!

[Spurtacular]

You're not validating anything but your continued interest in me and my posts, derp.

Now show you give a fuck again by responding to this post.

You tell us your reason for your tantrum(s), then.

[koriwhat]

You tell us your reason for your tantrum(s), then.

5 yr olds need no reason... it's in their nature to cry just like it's in pav's nature to act like a 5 yr old.

[Pavlov]

you blow my notifications up daily... you have no will power!I'm not trying to ignore you.

[Pavlov]

You tell us your reason for your tantrum(s), then.I asked you a simple question about claim you made.

Why not just answer it?

Please just answer that question without making excuses or referring to muh conditions.

[koriwhat]

I'm not trying to ignore you.

i've known that forever now... you def try your hardest to be a nagging pos to everyone here. it's what you do but i doubt you do it in real life. hey, maybe you have no one in real life to nag. :tu

[Spurtacular]

:lol...

[Pavlov]

i've known that forever now... you def try your hardest to be a nagging pos to everyone here. it's what you do but i doubt you do it in real life. hey, maybe you have no one in real life to nag. :tuWhy can't you just ignore me, tough guy?

[Spurtacular]

I asked you a simple question about claim you made.

Why not just answer it?

Please just answer that question without making excuses or referring to muh conditions.

:lmao You just admitted that you threw your tantrum cos you didn't get your way. :lmao

[koriwhat]

Why can't you just ignore me, tough guy?

because daily i have multiple notifications from you. turn the question around and ask yourself why you have to nag me constantly instead of just leaving me alone.

[Pavlov]

:lmao You just admitted that you threw your tantrum cos you didn't get your way. :lmaoNo, I told you what I did ITT.

And you can't even answer that question.

Why not just answer it?

[Pavlov]

because daily i have multiple notifications from you. turn the question around and ask yourself why you have to nag me constantly instead of just leaving me alone.Because you melt down so easily in the face of simple questions like derp does.

You're terrified to discuss anything you bring up....

....on a discussion board.

lol kori

[koriwhat]

Because you melt down so easily in the face of simple questions like derp does.

You're terrified to discuss anything you bring up....

....on a discussion board.

lol kori

i discuss plenty but to those that DEMAND of me to explain things to them make me feel the need not to explain a damn thing at that point. it's your ego and you let it get in the way of a potential discussion on topics we're both interested in.

i'm not beholden to you nor do i care for your demands.

[Spurtacular]

No, I told you what I did ITT.

And you can't even answer that question.

Why not just answer it?

What's an ITT?

[Pavlov]

What's an ITT?In This Thread.

See -- you asked and I answered.

Why can't you do that about your claim?

[Spurtacular]

In This Thread.

See -- you asked and I answered.

Why can't you do that about your claim?

:cry See muh moral high ground :cry

:lmao

[Pavlov]

:cry See muh moral high ground :cry

:lmaoWhy can't you answer simple questions about claims you make?

[Spurtacular]

Why can't you answer simple questions about claims you make?

And miss out on the epic tantrums?

:lmao

[Pavlov]

And miss out on the epic tantrums?

:lmaoDescribe the "tantrums" you're claiming.

I'm claiming you don't know what you're talking about and are doing everything possible to avoid discussing the issue you brought up.

My evidence is every post you've made since I asked that simple question.

[Spurtacular]

Describe the "tantrums" you're claiming.

I'm claiming you don't know what you're talking about and are doing everything possible to avoid discussing the issue you brought up.

My evidence is every post you've made since I asked that simple question.

:cry I'm building a case, damn it! :cry

:lmao

[Pavlov]

:cry I'm building a case, damn it! :cry

:lmaoIt's just a couple sentences.

Why won't you just answer a simple question about your claim?

[Spurtacular]

It's just a couple sentences.

Why won't you just answer a simple question about your claim?

37th time asking to to be the charm?

[Pavlov]

37th time asking to to be the charm?It's a legitimate question.

On this discussion board....

[Spurtacular]

It's a legitimate question.

On this discussion board....

Is that how you justify asking 37 straight times?

[Pavlov]

Is that how you justify asking 37 straight times?Your not answering it justifies asking it again.

[Spurtacular]

Your not answering it justifies asking it again.

Just in case I didn't see it the other 36 times.

[Pavlov]

Just in case I didn't see it the other 36 times.To bring you back around from your excuse making and distractions.

Why not just answer the question about your claim?

[Spurtacular]

To bring you back around from your excuse making and distractions.

Why not just answer the question about your claim?

40th time the charm now. :lol

[Pavlov]

40th time the charm now. :lol
Why not just answer the question about your claim?

You're doing everything but answering the question.

You could simply say "I will never answer your question about my claim."

[Spurtacular]

Why not just answer the question about your claim?

You're doing everything but answering the question.

You'll literally ask something 41 times and yet can't be bothered to watch an 18 second video.

:lmao Today's Psychopav Chump

[Millennial_Messiah]

C-C-C-COMBO BREAKER!

[Pavlov]

You'll literally ask something 41 times and yet can't be bothered to watch an 18 second video.

:lmao Today's Psychopav ChumpI asked you to answer in your own words, without whining or trying to change the subject.

If you can't do it, just say so and I'll stop asking.

Simple.

[Spurtacular]

I asked you to answer in your own words, without whining or trying to change the subject.

If you can't do it, just say so and I'll stop asking.

Simple.

I did do that. And you won't stop asking.

Simple.

[Pavlov]

I did do that. And you won't stop asking.

Simple.You never said you couldn't answer in your own words without whining or trying to change the subject.

Say it now.

[Spurtacular]

You never said you couldn't answer in your own words without whining or trying to change the subject.

Say it now.

It was answered. You're throwing your tantrum, anyways. Par.

[Pavlov]

It was answered.Could you provide a link to the post where you answered in your own words without whining or trying to change the subject?

[Texxx]

I've said since the beginning that it will be Kamala Harris. The DNC has made that clear from the jump.

[Pavlov]

I've said since the beginning that it will be Kamala Harris. The DNC has made that clear from the jump.The beginning? This is your second post.

[Chris]

"The beginning? This is your second post."
http://i64.tinypic.com/33u9w1d.jpg

[ChumpDumper]

:lmao Qhris doesn't even know what a forum cop is anymore.

[Chris]

I've said since the beginning that it will be Kamala Harris. The DNC has made that clear from the jump.

R.I.P.

https://twitter.com/thedailybeast/status/1116496070396141568

[Winehole23]

No, no, that's what mainstream Dems like about Harris.

Professional, tough big state pol with LE bona fides, who might steal a few right-leaning independent voters with her gun-toting ways.

[koriwhat]

No, no, that's what mainstream Dems like about Harris.

Professional, tough big state pol with LE bona fides, who might steal a few right-leaning independent voters with her gun-toting ways.

Not if those people have ever watched her try and grill someone on the hill... her line of questions show just how ridiculous harris is and what a pawn she is for the radical left.

[Winehole23]

Not if those people have ever watched her try and grill someone on the hill... her line of questions show just how ridiculous harris is and what a pawn she is for the radical left.What about her strikes you as radical?

[koriwhat]

What about her strikes you as radical?

first off co-sponsoring the GND is a clear sign tbh... but just listening to her on the hill is enough to know she's not genuine and out to obstruct. if you haven't seen her on the hill at all then look up some cspan videos and get back to me.

[Will Hunting]

De Santis sent out robocalls (I got one myself) before the vote ENCOURAGING people to vote for it - he definitely will not be seeking to block it (I don't even think one can block it after the voters have had their say) - maybe that's why his approval ratings are so high. Florida voters overwhelming voted FOR it so it will be in effect for the next election. The "know no bounds" specifically refers to the Parkland shooter himself (not FORMER felons of which he is not one) - how desperate for votes do you have to be to want his vote.
Just FYI to anyone who read this, it's total bullshit.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/nbcblk/felon-voting-rights-back-jeopardy-florida-n991146

Florida Republicans are now trying to pass a law forcing convicted felons who've completed a prison sentence to pay all fines before they can vote using the logic that fines are "part of the sentence".

The idea that DeSantis wants the right to vote restored as quickly as possible is retarded. He's trying to block it with as much bureaucracy as possible so the poor felons who are more likely to vote Democrat won't be able to register.

[TheGreatYacht]

I'm not a Democrat but my order of preference is
1) Tulsi Gabbard
2) Bernie Sanders
3) Andrew Yang
4) Elizabeth Warren

[ElNono]

I'm not a Democrat but my order of preference is
1) Tulsi Gabbard
2) Bernie Sanders
3) Andrew Yang
4) Elizabeth Warren

5) Pop?

[Spurtacular]

I'm not a Democrat but my order of preference is
1) Tulsi Gabbard
2) Bernie Sanders
3) Andrew Yang
4) Elizabeth Warren

Definitely a confirmed shill by any standard. Then again, Bernie went all in for Hillary; but if you somehow have faith that he's gonna give the farm away and you want that.

[Winehole23]

first off co-sponsoring the GND is a clear sign tbh... but just listening to her on the hill is enough to know she's not genuine and out to obstruct. if you haven't seen her on the hill at all then look up some cspan videos and get back to me.Harris seems like more of an establishment Dem compared to the field, to me.

I also disagree slightly about obstruction. If the Dems beat DJT and win the Senate -- a tall order, admittedly -- they'll be in a position to govern.

[TheGreatYacht]

I'm not a Democrat but my order of preference is
1) Tulsi Gabbard
2) Bernie Sanders
3) Andrew Yang
4) Elizabeth Warren

I revise my list. Remove Elizabeth Warren and replace her with Mike Gravel. Shit, I might even place Mike Gravel in my top 2.




https://youtu.be/0770rsZIaFc

[spurraider21]

Which current candidate do you think can best do something you want done?


Biden


More than Trump?


He's the only one who can beat Trump.

I'd prefer someone to quell the nastiness and begin to reach across the isle again to get something done. Scoreboard politics doesn't help the people. We don't need an exciting person as POTUS. We just need someone who isn't about to cash in.


So you would vote for Biden and not Trump?


Yes. I voted for him twice already. I've never voted for Trump.
:lol search function back up

[ChumpDumper]

:lol search function back up:lol "isle"

[Th'Pusher]

:lol search function back up

Let’s not forget who put DMC on the ST trump train.

[Millennial_Messiah]

:lol And in the end, the Dems couldn't pick a better POTUS nominee than the guy who repeatedly grabs 12 year old girls' breasts like Avante.

[Will Hunting]

:lol And in the end, the Dems couldn't pick a better POTUS nominee than the guy who repeatedly grabs 12 year old girls' breasts like Avante.
Compared to the Republican President who likes to grab ‘em by the pussy.

[ElNono]

It's a shitshow, tbh... but happy for my guy AaronY, tbh

[Millennial_Messiah]

Compared to the Republican President who likes to grab ‘em by the pussy.

At least he's only grabbed adult women by the pussy, tbh. Pedo Joe / Joevante on the other hand.....

[Thread]

At least he's only grabbed adult women by the pussy, tbh. Pedo Joe / Joevante on the other hand.....

"And they let you."

You guys always forget that part.

[Millennial_Messiah]

"And they let you."

You guys always forget that part.

Exactly! If it's consensual and not in public then it's perfectly fine. Who doesn't grab their [adult] wife (or gf, or mistress/sancha, or date night hookup etc) by the pussy in the bedroom/hotel room? It's honestly pretty gay NOT to.

[Spurtacular]

I revise my list. Remove Elizabeth Warren and replace her with Mike Gravel. Shit, I might even place Mike Gravel in my top 2.




https://youtu.be/0770rsZIaFc

At 2:12 a great shot of Chumpettes' three biggest military industrial complex heroes, Joe, Barry, and Hillary all lined up and smiling like sociopaths.

[Spurtacular]

Compared to the Republican President who likes to grab ‘em by the pussy.

Actual pedophilia vs. fantasy talk. :lmao

[Spurtacular]

"And they let you."

You guys always forget that part.

No, it's sexual assault!!!!

[TheGreatYacht]

At 2:12 a great shot of Chumpettes' three biggest military industrial complex heroes, Joe, Barry, and Hillary all lined up and smiling like sociopaths.

:lol

Watch and believe 100% of what CNN says, be a Democratic party loyalist and you will be like ChumpDumper.

[Millennial_Messiah]

#PedoJoe

[AaronY]

It's a shitshow, tbh... but happy for my guy AaronY (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=27732), tbh
:danceclub:danceclub

[Spurtacular]

:danceclub:danceclub

Congrats on your zombie puppet, personzillA.

[Reck]

At least he's only grabbed adult women by the pussy, tbh. Pedo Joe / Joevante on the other hand.....

That we know of.

There are audio and videos of Trump harrassing kids in pageants and even telling a 10 year old he'd be fucking her soon.

And god only knows what he did to poor Ivanka behind closed doors. He's already on TV saying how he wants to fuck her.

[Will Hunting]

That we know of.

There are audio and videos of Trump harrassing kids in pageants and even telling a 10 year old he'd be fucking her soon.

And god only knows what he did to poor Ivanka behind closed doors. He's already on TV saying how he wants to fuck her.
A 13 year filed a civil suit against Trump accusing him of raping her at an Epstein party. The idea that Trump has only gone after adult women is bullshit.

[Will Hunting]

At 2:12 a great shot of Chumpettes' three biggest military industrial complex heroes, Joe, Barry, and Hillary all lined up and smiling like sociopaths.
The shot of them all laughing at Gravel for wanting to decrease defense spending is pretty sickening tbh.

[Spurtacular]

The shot of them all laughing at Gravel for wanting to decrease defense spending is pretty sickening tbh.

Democrats and their benefactors want war. Funny that the Chumpettes never come to terms on that. They just try to wish it away.

[Millennial_Messiah]

A 13 year filed a civil suit against Trump accusing him of raping her at an Epstein party. The idea that Trump has only gone after adult women is bullshit.
If he raped, wouldn't it be a criminal suit instead of a tort? Civil suit smells badly of "I want a piece of your pie and can't get it by simply asking nicely."

[Will Hunting]

If he raped, wouldn't it be a criminal suit instead of a tort? Civil suit smells badly of "I want a piece of your pie and can't get it by simply asking nicely."
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/11/3/13501364/trump-rape-13-year-old-lawsuit-katie-johnson-allegation

[Millennial_Messiah]

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/11/3/13501364/trump-rape-13-year-old-lawsuit-katie-johnson-allegation

Dropped her lawsuit. :toast

Failed attempt at a money grab, tbh.

[Spurtacular]

All this debate, and then the DNC snapped their fingers and told ya'll bitches you get the zombie and you'll like it!

:rollin