Would you rather have Pascal Siakam or Lamarcus Aldridge?

[Rusty]

both are 2nd option on their teams but who is better?

[Robz4000]

LMA is currently better but I'd rather have Siakam due to age/upside.

[sasaint]

LMA is currently better but I'd rather have Siakam due to age/upside.

Young enough to break of bad habits like 20-foot fadeaways.

[Keepin' it real]

both are 2nd option on their teams but who is better?

Whichever guy scores more points or has the better PER or the better +/- on any given night is awesome and our hero ... and the other guy sucks and should be benched or traded immediately. -- spurstalk

[Pavlov]

lol logging into your alt to start a duplicate thread.

[BD24]

LMA is currently better but I'd rather have Siakam due to age/upside.

[slick'81]

Lma for this season and next

[TDMVPDPOY]

one plays monkey ball man...

[99 Problems]

Well it’s pretty simple. One is young and improving and under a Pop type figure would be super moving forward. The other has been a good servant of the Spurs. Came, unlucky not to win a championship due to Zaza and then the Kawhiiwa malfunction tbh. Thought about moving in between but sat down with Pop and sorted it. Should of had his ring here but that’s life. So moving forward you say Siakam due to age.

[james evans]

Doesn't matter, because once Siakam gets under popovich, all that shit he's doing in Toronto would stop