View Full Version : Julian Assange indicted on 18 new counts
djohn2oo8
05-23-2019, 03:38 PM
1131650472832655360
djohn2oo8
05-23-2019, 03:44 PM
Maynneeee I remember back in the day, when somebody cited violation of the espionage act was on the table.
djohn2oo8
05-23-2019, 03:51 PM
Up to 170 years in prison :)
djohn2oo8
05-23-2019, 04:05 PM
TSA
TSA
What did you @ me welcher?
djohn2oo8
05-23-2019, 04:45 PM
Thoughts?
Thoughts?
Did you @ me because you thought this had something to do with the election?
Up to 170 years in prison :)
And he'll probably get maybe 3 years. :lol
Manafort also faced like 100 years but skated to freedom basically.
Pavlov
05-23-2019, 05:51 PM
TSA salty today.
What does your boy Qanon say about it?
Spurs Homer
05-23-2019, 05:56 PM
Trump: “i loooove wikileaks!”
Spurtacular
05-23-2019, 05:58 PM
:blah
How big a W is this for a Hiillary sperm shielder such as you?
Winehole23
05-23-2019, 06:16 PM
Why is the Trump Adminstration prosecuting Assange?
Why doesn't DJT pardon Assange?
Apparently he lacks the balls to stand up to the DEEP STATE and the MIC.
Winehole23
05-23-2019, 06:23 PM
1131668904181424132
djohn2oo8
05-23-2019, 06:24 PM
And he'll probably get maybe 3 years. :lol
Manafort also faced like 100 years but skated to freedom basically.
Manafort is indicted on 16 new charges in NY
djohn2oo8
05-23-2019, 06:24 PM
Did you @ me because you thought this had something to do with the election?
You rooted for Assange. You. Yourself. You ain’t living it down.
djohn2oo8
05-23-2019, 06:25 PM
TSA salty today.
What does your boy Qanon say about it?
He knows it ain’t a good look for his beloved Wikileaksz
TheGreatYacht
05-23-2019, 06:30 PM
https://youtu.be/c-xeGWcvifw
Pavlov
05-23-2019, 06:30 PM
How big a W is this for a Hiillary sperm shielder such as you?
What are her crimes, derp?
Name them.
djohn2oo8
05-23-2019, 06:30 PM
1131668904181424132
the indictment makes clear Assange is charged with helping to steal the info, including hacking passwords. That is not covered by the 1st Amendment
spurraider21
05-23-2019, 06:31 PM
What are her crimes, derp?
Name them.
let the sperm shielding commence
You rooted for Assange. You. Yourself. You ain’t living it down.
You did think this had something to do with the election :lol
djohn2oo8
05-23-2019, 06:50 PM
1131667955819769856
djohn2oo8
05-23-2019, 06:51 PM
You did think this had something to do with the election :lol
You rooted for Wikileaks. Plan and simple.
You rooted for Wikileaks. Plan and simple.
I still do. And your stupid ass thought these indictments had something to do with the election. :lol
djohn2oo8
05-23-2019, 06:56 PM
I still do.
The same Wikileaks whose aim is to hurt US National Security. Who hacked the Pentagon?
djohn2oo8
05-23-2019, 06:56 PM
TSA roots for criminals. My goodness.
Chucho
05-23-2019, 06:57 PM
LOL djohn tryna get cred back. :lol
djohn2oo8
05-23-2019, 07:01 PM
LOL djohn tryna get cred back. :lol
Espionage. Called it. It would be on the table for anyone associated with Wikileaks.
LOL djohn tryna get cred back. :lol
:lol poor fella thought this had something to do with the election
djohn2oo8
05-23-2019, 07:11 PM
:lol poor fella thought this had something to do with the election
These indictments have something to do with getting people killed. Surely you don’t think Assange won’t talk so he won’t serve 170 years? :lol
djohn2oo8
05-23-2019, 07:12 PM
What’s something he might try to do for a lighter sentence if convicted?
djohn2oo8
05-23-2019, 07:14 PM
Btw. Who said he wouldn’t be charged separately? Hell these charges are separate from the last ones :lol
I still do.
Why?
For the simple fact you like to root for the enemy or is there something more behind your support?
Spurs Homer
05-23-2019, 07:48 PM
:lol poor fella thought this had something to do with the election
You want to go on record here - and say that Assange
will NEVER get more indictments based on the election?
You want to go on record here - and say that Assange
will NEVER get more indictments based on the election?
What do possible future indictments based on the election have to do with djohn thinking these indictments were based on the election?
Why?
For the simple fact you like to root for the enemy or is there something more behind your support?
Tried to find a dunced down thread for you :bobo
1131698964565254144
pgardn
05-23-2019, 09:54 PM
Tried to find a dunced down thread for you :bobo
1131698964565254144
And does the press ever inform the government that they are going with the story, give us a reason to hold back?
answer: yes
Has the press in the US ever held back stories based on the response of the government as to why it should not be published?
answer: yes
And does the press ever inform the government that they are going with the story, give us a reason to hold back?
answer: yes
Has the press in the US ever held back stories based on the response of the government as to why it should not be published?
answer: yes
1131681340527730688
pgardn
05-23-2019, 10:38 PM
1131681340527730688
That particular article covers a minuscule amount of what was released.
Wiki leaks did absolutely NOT have people under their employ who actually understand the nature of US relationships with other countries.
This is why the government does lend an ear to real news organizations. Not bulk release stolen data decided by one individual.
djohn2oo8
05-23-2019, 11:43 PM
1131738147237302272
Winehole23
05-23-2019, 11:47 PM
the indictment makes clear Assange is charged with helping to steal the info, including hacking passwords. That is not covered by the 1st Amendmentdid you read the indictment?
1131691516894830598
djohn2oo8
05-23-2019, 11:49 PM
did you read the indictment?
1131691516894830598
I did. Did you? Because that’s exactly what happens
djohn2oo8
05-23-2019, 11:50 PM
1131674047228588038
Winehole23
05-23-2019, 11:56 PM
Under the DOJ's theory, receiving and publishing classified material is prosecutable as espionage. Journos aren't wrong to be concerned.
Lol passing off other people's tweets -- verbatim --as your own take.
djohn2oo8
05-24-2019, 12:04 AM
Under the DOJ's theory, receiving and publishing classified material is prosecutable as espionage. Journos aren't wrong to be concerned.
Lol passing off other people's tweets as your own takes.
Except Assange is and never was a journalist. Unless they instructed and assisted in the hacking of classified material they really have no business being concerned
DarrinS
05-24-2019, 12:10 AM
Good to see djohn still alive
Winehole23
05-24-2019, 12:10 AM
Assange doesn't have to be a "real" journalist to have 1st Amendment protections,
Fwiw, the Obama DOJ considered prosecuting Assange under the Espionage Act but declined to do so because they could see no way to do it that wouldn't put legit journalists at risk.
djohn2oo8
05-24-2019, 12:13 AM
Assange doesn't have to be a "real" journalist to have 1st Amendment protections,
Fwiw, the Obama DOJ considered prosecuting Assange under the Espionage Act but declined to do so because they could see no way to do it that wouldn't put legit journalists at risk.
In this case, assisting a hostile adversary to harm US national security doesn’t get him 1st amendment protections. And yes The Obama administration considered it.
Winehole23
05-24-2019, 12:18 AM
Face it: Trump is prosecuting Assange for showing up the USG and US Armed forces as liars and war criminals during the Iraq War.
If he succeeds, hard to imagine he wouldn't sic Barr on the fake news media next.
Spurminator
05-24-2019, 12:20 AM
the indictment makes clear Assange is charged with helping to steal the info, including hacking passwords.
Where does it say this? Other than the tweet you copied.
Winehole23
05-24-2019, 12:21 AM
In this case, assisting a hostile adversary to harm US national security doesn’t get him 1st amendment protections. And yes The Obama administration considered it.A lot of people far more learned than me think there's a 1st Amendment issue and a real danger to the press.
If you can't see it or refuse to entertain the notion, that may reflect your own stubbornness more than the facts.
djohn2oo8
05-24-2019, 12:46 AM
Where does it say this? Other than the tweet you copied.
https://scontent.fiws1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/fr/cp0/e15/q65/60785605_3067209739971019_5061094087562625024_n.jp g?_nc_cat=100&efg=eyJpIjoidCJ9&_nc_ht=scontent.fiws1-1.fna&oh=ca22ab310309070428c64727958933b3&oe=5D979C3C
djohn2oo8
05-24-2019, 12:47 AM
#15 In furtherance of this Scheme, Assange agreed to assist Manning in cracking a password hash stored on United States Department of Defense computers
djohn2oo8
05-24-2019, 12:47 AM
And that Winehole is espionage
Spurminator
05-24-2019, 12:49 AM
https://scontent.fiws1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/fr/cp0/e15/q65/60785605_3067209739971019_5061094087562625024_n.jp g?_nc_cat=100&efg=eyJpIjoidCJ9&_nc_ht=scontent.fiws1-1.fna&oh=ca22ab310309070428c64727958933b3&oe=5D979C3C
Thanks. I'd tend to agree this goes beyond 1st Amendment protections.
I also share Winehole's concern in that I don't trust this administration to differentiate.
Winehole23
05-24-2019, 12:55 AM
And that Winehole is espionagewe'll see. legal process is seldom ao straightforward. if the government does not prevail on the merits of the case, you'd be wrong about that.
you could be right though, prediction is a fool's game.
Winehole23
05-24-2019, 05:15 PM
Eugene Volokh has a fine-grained analysis of the 1st Amendment issues, with relevant citation of the indictments:
https://reason.com/2019/05/23/theory-of-revised-julian-assange-indictment-could-apply-to-ordinary-reporters/
TheGreatYacht
09-10-2019, 01:27 PM
Spoiled Brat Meghan McCain Schooled By Pamela Anderson On The View
https://youtu.be/vBuv7TVcZ4Y
boutons_deux
11-19-2019, 09:28 AM
Sweden drops Assange rape investigation after nearly 10 years
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-assange-sweden/sweden-says-it-is-dropping-assange-rape-investigation-idUSKBN1XT1QO?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+reuters%2FtopNews+%28News+%2F +US+%2F+Top+News%29
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.