Washington Post: State Dept. steps up email probe of former Hillary Clinton aides

[ducks]

https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/09/28/politics/email-probe-state-department-hillary-clinton/index.html?r=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnn.com%2F

[Reck]

:lmao

[boutons_deux]

:lol

8 Repug committees, and $10Ms wasted, and nothing was found.

But greasebag Pompeo still running with "butter emails"? :lol

[Pavlov]

https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/09/28/politics/email-probe-state-department-hillary-clinton/index.html?r=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnn.com%2FSo they started this probe right around the time they found out about the whistleblower.

What a coincidence!

[ducks]

You did not read the article
Been started several weeks

[Pavlov]

You did not read the article
Been started several weeksThey knew about the whistleblower complaint several weeks ago.

[Spurtacular]

So they started this probe right around the time they found out about the whistleblower.

What a coincidence!

Tell us your conspiracy theory.

[Pavlov]

Tell us your conspiracy theory.1) They heard about the whistleblower.

2) They started this email probe.

3) Whistleblower story becomes public.

4) They leak news of email probe.

Pretty simple.

[ducks]

1) They heard about the whistleblower.

2) They started this email probe.

3) Whistleblower story becomes public.

4) They leak news of email probe.

Pretty simple.
"This has nothing to do with who is in the White House," a senior State Department official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly about an ongoing probe, told the Post. "This is about the time it took to go through millions of emails, which is about 3 1/2 years."

[Spurtacular]

1) They heard about the whistleblower.

2) They started this email probe.

3) Whistleblower story becomes public.

4) They leak news of email probe.

Pretty simple.

But you have no proof about the leak, correct?

This is just wishful thinking.

[Pavlov]

But you have no proof about the leak, correct?:lol of course I have proof of the leak.

ducks just posted it.

There would be no story if there wasn't a leak.

Do you understand?

Yes or no.

[Spurtacular]

:lol of course I have proof of the leak.

ducks just posted it.

There would be no story if there wasn't a leak.

Do you understand?

Yes or no.

Cool. Tell us exactly who leaked it.

[Pavlov]

Cool. Tell us exactly who leaked it.Don't have to.

It's a leak from Trump's state department. Period.

[Spurtacular]

Don't have to.

It's a leak from Trump's state department. Period.

You don't have to; but it's a conspiracy theory is all, then.

[Pavlov]

You don't have to; but it's a conspiracy theory is all, then.Yes, you clearly asked me what my conspiracy theory is.

I told you what it is.

Somehow you forgot that's what it is and had to tell yourself that's what it is.

lol derp

[Spurtacular]

Yes, you clearly asked me what my conspiracy theory is.

I told you what it is.

Somehow you forgot that's what it is and had to tell yourself that's what it is.

lol derp

I didn't forget it. I am just reinforcing that your conspiracy theory is a hope and a prayer.

[Pavlov]

I didn't forget it. I am just reinforcing that your conspiracy theory is a hope and a prayer.It's a conspiracy theory. I never claimed it was anything else.

Certainly fits all known facts.

Don't get so pissy because your conspiracy theories don't stand up to any scrutiny whatsoever.

lol derp's gonna lash out at det one

[Spurtacular]

It's a conspiracy theory. I never claimed it was anything else.

Certainly fits all known facts.

Don't get so pissy because your conspiracy theories don't stand up to any scrutiny whatsoever.

lol derp's gonna lash out at det one

Well, it's interesting how you're allowed to fill in blanks; but when others do it, they're just delusional. :lmao

[Pavlov]

Well, it's interesting how you're allowed to fill in blanks; but when others do it, they're just delusional. :lmaoWhich blank did I fill in?

Be specific. This is your claim.

[Spurtacular]

Which blank did I fill in?

Be specific. This is your claim.

Who leaked, obviously

Why do you insist on being a troglodyte? Are you under the impression that it's a good look for you?

[Pavlov]

Who leaked, obviouslyNo, ducks said it was Trump's state department.

:lol you're terrible at this

[Spurtacular]

No, ducks said it was Trump's state department.

:lol you're terrible at this

:lol Chump trying to pass the buck.

You said "they" leaked. Who are they?

[Blake]

You did not read the article
Been started several weeks

Lol ducks trying to finger wag anyone else for not reading the article he posted

[Pavlov]

:lol Chump trying to pass the buck.

You said "they" leaked. Who are they?:lol you just proved you didn't read the article or ducks' posts.

What are you even doing here?

lol

[Spurtacular]

:lol you just proved you didn't read the article or ducks' posts.

What are you even doing here?

lol

I never claimed to have read the article, tiny w seeker.

I'm asking who "they" are in your conspiracy theory.

You gonna answer, or you gonna cry some more?

[Pavlov]

I never claimed to have read the article, tiny w seeker.

I'm asking who "they" are in your conspiracy theory.

You gonna answer, or you gonna cry some more?ducks already posted it.

You didn't read that either.:lol

I challenge you to read posts in this thread.

I'm not going to spoon feed you.

:lmao ignorant derp

[Spurtacular]

ducks already posted it.

You didn't read that either.:lol

I challenge you to read posts in this thread.

I'm not going to spoon feed you.

:lmao ignorant derp

You obviously don't want to state the most basic details of your conspiracy theory.

[Pavlov]

You obviously don't want to state the most basic details of your conspiracy theory.I already said who.

The article already said who.

ducks already said who.

You didn't read any of them.

All you want to do is post about me.

So post about me some more.

:lmao

[boutons_deux]

Another example of Repugs ABUSING govt resources to attack political opposition

130+ Hillary aides investigated.

State Dept. intensifies email probe of Hillary Clinton’s former aides

"Those targeted were notified that emails they sent years ago

have been retroactively classified and now constitute potential security violations," :lol

“This has nothing to do with who is in the White House,” :lol

the Trump administration could be accused of employing the powers of the executive branch against perceived political adversaries.

State Department officials vigorously denied there was any political motivation behind their actions :lol

“The process is set up in a manner to completely avoid any appearance of political bias,” :lol

a way for Republicans “to keep the Clinton email issue alive.” :lol

“a way to tarnish a whole bunch of Democratic foreign policy people” and

discourage if not prevent them from returning to government service.

Former Obama administration officials, however, described the probe as

a remarkably aggressive crackdown by an administration with its own troubled record of handling classified material.

Trash has improperly disclosed classified information to foreign officials and

used phones that national security officials warned were vulnerable to foreign surveillance,

Trump overrode the concerns of his former White House chief of staff and U.S. intelligence officials to give his son-in-law and senior White House adviser Jared Kushner access to highly classified materials,

“You have been identified as possibly bearing some culpability” in supposedly newly uncovered “security incidents,”

no indication in any of the materials reviewed by The Post that the emails under scrutiny contained sensitive information about classified U.S. initiatives or programs.

an effort to harass diplomats for the routine conduct of their job.

“It is such an obscene abuse of power and time

involving so many people for so many years,”

“This has just sucked up people’s lives for years and years.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/state-dept-intensifies-email-probe-of-hillary-clintons-former-aides/2019/09/28/9f15497e-e1f2-11e9-8dc8-498eabc129a0_story.html (https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/state-dept-intensifies-email-probe-of-hillary-clintons-former-aides/2019/09/28/9f15497e-e1f2-11e9-8dc8-498eabc129a0_story.html)

but it's fine if PVL so-called Pres-for-4-terms Trash uses an unencrypted phone :lol

and Kushner FAILED b/g checks but Trash still gave him classified info :lol

[AaronY]

:lmao

[Spurtacular]

I already said who.

The article already said who.

ducks already said who.

You didn't read any of them.

All you want to do is post about me.

So post about me some more.

:lmao

Yea, "they".

:lmao Chump stepping down.

[koriwhat]

Well, it's interesting how you're allowed to fill in blanks; but when others do it, they're just delusional. :lmao

it's what that faggot does tbh. he'd grill you to no end over anything you say but when he vomits a dumb fucking conspiracy of his own it's the end all to the conversation and you better not question every facet of his dumbass conspiracy.

this is why i've always claimed chump isn't a genuine dude whatsoever and merely a troll and a loser in real life. :tu

[Pavlov]

Yea, "they".

:lmao Chump stepping down.
:lol no

You didn't read.

lol completely ignorant derp wants to be spoon fed

[Pavlov]

it's what that faggot does tbh. he'd grill you to no end over anything you say but when he vomits a dumb fucking conspiracy of his own it's the end all to the conversation and you better not question every facet of his dumbass conspiracy.

this is why i've always claimed chump isn't a genuine dude whatsoever and merely a troll and a loser in real life. :tu
:lmao you can't stop talking about me

[Spurtacular]

:lol no

You didn't read.

lol completely ignorant derp wants to be spoon fed

I want you to not be a pussy and say who they are in your conspiracy theory.

Be a pussy if you must though.

[Pavlov]

I want you to not be a pussy and say who they are in your conspiracy theory.I already did. ducks already did. The article already did. Go back and actually read what every one of us posted.

[Spurtacular]

I already did. ducks already did. The article already did. Go back and actually read what every one of us posted.

You said they every time when you presented your conspiracy theory. But even if you had somehow said it, you shouldn't be scared to make a clarification. Be a pussy if you must.

[Pavlov]

You said they every time when you presented your conspiracy theory. But even if you had somehow said it, you shouldn't be scared to make a clarification. Be a pussy if you must.It's been clearly mentioned three times by two posters and the article.

If you want to know about this, stop crying and read the article.

You're going to keep crying about your ignorance and beg me to spoon feed you.

[Winehole23]

1178348014076911616

[Spurtacular]

It's been clearly mentioned three times by two posters and the article.

If you want to know about this, stop crying and read the article.

You're going to keep crying about your ignorance and beg me to spoon feed you.

Chump too embarrassed to say. Par.

[Pavlov]

Chump too embarrassed to say. Par.I already said it.

Why are you begging to be spoon fed when all you need to do is read the article that is linked in the very first post of the thread?

Because you're derp, and you only want to post about me.

[Blake]

1178348014076911616

- ST political forum 2016-present

[Spurs Homer]

Hrc emails bad

ivankas and jareds and security clearance fuckery- not so much

bidens debunked nothing-burger - “clutch your pearls in horror”

trumps crimes/rapes/treason/bribery/porn star payoffs/12k lies/

- not really a concern


perfectly normal logic and perfectly squeaky clean moral ground!

[Spurtacular]

I already said it.

Why are you begging to be spoon fed when all you need to do is read the article that is linked in the very first post of the thread?

Because you're derp, and you only want to post about me.

Stay embarrassed.