PDA

View Full Version : The Official Saudia Arabian US Airmen Are Doing AWESOME Thread



Spurtacular
12-08-2019, 01:38 AM
http://news.trust.org/item/20191207213105-2bnc4
https://apnews.com/75a8adc71422596a54052540fabb7230
https://news.yahoo.com/three-killed-shooter-dead-us-navy-attack-170619246.html
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-florida-shooting/saudi-suspect-in-u-s-navy-base-attack-linked-to-anti-u-s-twitter-screed-idUSKBN1YB0FK
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/10504744/saudi-airmans-colleagues-us-naval-base-shooting
https://www.stamfordadvocate.com/news/article/Investigation-broadens-in-shooting-at-Naval-Air-14890151.php
https://news.yahoo.com/saudis-distance-themselves-us-naval-shooter-113700686.html
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/12/07/joshua-kaleb-watson-pensacola-navy-base-shooting-victim/4364650002/

"AWESOME" by their standards, of course.

Shooting up US military base and filming it...

ChumpDumper
12-08-2019, 01:45 AM
https://static01.nyt.com/images/2017/05/23/world/23orb/23orb-superJumbo.jpg

Spurtacular
12-08-2019, 02:19 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZC5gtOw3DU

ChumpDumper
12-08-2019, 02:20 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZC5gtOw3DUI posted a picture of the king Of Saudi Arabia.

In your thread about Saudi Arabia.

Spurtacular
12-08-2019, 02:22 AM
I posted a picture of the king Of Saudi Arabia.

In your thread about Saudi Arabia.

Oh, Trump being in the pic is pure coincidence?

ChumpDumper
12-08-2019, 02:30 AM
Oh, Trump being in the pic is pure coincidence?You can make whatever inference you want out of that or just get defensive over it. It's your Saudi Arabia thread.

I'll ask you a question you won't answer:

What do you want to do about Saudi Arabia?

Spurtacular
12-08-2019, 02:54 AM
You can make whatever inference you want out of that or just get defensive over it. It's your Saudi Arabia thread.

I'll ask you a question you won't answer:

What do you want to do about Saudi Arabia?

I did; and you disputed it. Now clarify whether your reason for posting the pic.

ChumpDumper
12-08-2019, 02:56 AM
I did; and you disputed it. Now clarify whether your reason for posting the pic.It had the King of Saudi Arabia and his good buddy Trump in it.

They're good buddies.

And they are the heads of government for the two countries involved in the incident for which you dedicated this thread.

Now I'm going to ask you this question again that you won't answer:

What do you want to do about Saudi Arabia?

Spurtacular
12-08-2019, 02:57 AM
It had the King of Saudi Arabia and his good buddy Trump in it.

They're good buddies.

Now I'm going to ask you this question again that you won't answer:

What do you want to do about Saudi Arabia?

And what do these "good buddies" have to do with the Saudi airmen?

ChumpDumper
12-08-2019, 02:58 AM
And what do these "good buddies" have to do with the Saudi airmen?

They are the heads of government for the two countries involved in the incident for which you dedicated this thread.

Now I'm going to ask you this question a third time that you won't answer:

What do you want to do about Saudi Arabia?

Spurtacular
12-08-2019, 03:06 AM
They are the heads of government for the two countries involved in the incident for which you dedicated this thread.

Now I'm going to ask you this question a third time that you won't answer:

What do you want to do about Saudi Arabia?

Yea, every country has heads of governments. It seems you are just sperm shielding like you always do.

I acknowledge SA as a corrupt country. Do you?

ChumpDumper
12-08-2019, 03:12 AM
Yea, every country has heads of governments. It seems you are just sperm shielding like you always do.

I acknowledge SA as a corrupt country. Do you?Sure. Does Trump? He's the guy most responsible for Saudi Arabia policies now.

Now I'm going to ask you this question a fourth time that you won't answer:


What do you want done about Saudi Arabia?

It's your Saudi Arabia thread.

Spurtacular
12-08-2019, 03:16 AM
Sure. Does Trump? He's the guy most responsible for Saudi Arabia policies now.

Now I'm going to ask you this question a fourth time that you won't answer:


What do you want done about Saudi Arabia?

It's your Saudi Arabia thread.

Trump has not done a lot to directly thwart SA. Now what do you propose should be done to prevent these infiltrators?

ChumpDumper
12-08-2019, 03:18 AM
Trump has not done a lot to directly thwart SA.Trump has never said it's a corrupt country and never will.

The shooter was not an infiltrator.

Now I'm going to ask you this question a fifth time that you won't answer:

What do you want done about Saudi Arabia?

It's your Saudi Arabia thread.

Spurtacular
12-08-2019, 03:24 AM
The shooter was not an infiltrator.

He was an enemy combatant embedded in our armed services.

:lmao Fucking pyschopath :lmao

GTFO. You disqualified yourself from this thread if not this forum.

:rollin

ChumpDumper
12-08-2019, 03:28 AM
He was an enemy combatant embedded in our armed services.He wasn't embedded in the US military.

He was Saudi military training in the US.

Jesus Christ, you posted all those links and read none of them.

You just disqualified yourself from your own thread.

Spurtacular
12-08-2019, 03:30 AM
He wasn't embedded in the US military.

He was Saudi military training in the US.

Jesus Christ, you posted all those links and read none of them.

You just disqualified yourself from your own thread.

The enemy of freedom was in our compound. You're okay with that?

Spurtacular
12-08-2019, 03:32 AM
you posted all those links and read none of them.


Why would I? They're just reference points. I'm not gonna spend an hour reading them all so that I can impress you with my quiz knowledge.

ChumpDumper
12-08-2019, 03:34 AM
Why would I? They're just reference points. I'm not gonna spend an hour reading them all so that I can impress you with my quiz knowledge.So you don't really know anything about this.:tu

ChumpDumper
12-08-2019, 03:36 AM
The enemy of freedom was in our compound. You're okay with that?No, but how do you know which ones are enemies of freedom before they buy a gun in Florida and shoot people?

Now I'm going to ask you this question a sixth time that you won't answer:

What do you want done about Saudi Arabia?

It's your Saudi Arabia thread.

Splits
12-08-2019, 03:37 AM
Why would I? They're just reference points. I'm not gonna spend an hour reading them all so that I can impress you with my quiz knowledge.

:lmao

Spurtacular
12-08-2019, 03:37 AM
No, but how do you know which ones are enemies of freedom before they buy a gun in Florida and shoot people?

Lie detector tests would be a good start. Do you think they did that?

Spurtacular
12-08-2019, 03:38 AM
:lmao

Right? This story was about two days old, and none of you cucks would post it. :lmao

ChumpDumper
12-08-2019, 03:38 AM
Lie detector tests would be a good start. Do you think they did that?Since they aren't terribly reliable, no.

Is that all you want done about Saudi Arabia?

ChumpDumper
12-08-2019, 03:39 AM
Right? This story was about two days old, and none of you cucks would post it. :lmaoWhy didn't you post about it when it happened?

Pretty cucky of you tbh.

Spurtacular
12-08-2019, 03:42 AM
Why didn't you post about it when it happened?

Not cos I was sperm shielding like you, praying it wouldn't be part of the dialogue. :lmao

ChumpDumper
12-08-2019, 03:44 AM
Not cos I was sperm shielding like you, praying it wouldn't be part of the dialogue. :lmaoWhy would I pray that?

I'm talking about it now.

Now I'm going to ask you this question a seventh time that you won't answer:

What do you want done about Saudi Arabia?

It's your Saudi Arabia thread.

If you refuse to answer you're just sperm shielding.

Spurtacular
12-08-2019, 03:48 AM
Why would I pray that?

Cos you don't like that it speaks to what "conservatives" have said about these infiltrators. You wanted the candidate that wanted to bring in 600K of these cockroaches per year.

ChumpDumper
12-08-2019, 03:49 AM
Cos you don't like that it speaks to what "conservatives" have said about these infiltrators.No. I think radicalized Muslims are dangerous. You're just afraid of every Muslim.

You wanted the candidate that wanted to bring in 600K of these cockroaches per year.So you're saying all Muslims are cockroaches?

Yes or no.

Now I'm going to ask you this question a eighth time that you won't answer:

What do you want done about Saudi Arabia?

It's your Saudi Arabia thread.

If you refuse to answer you're just sperm shielding.

Spurtacular
12-08-2019, 03:51 AM
So you're saying all Muslims are cockroaches?

More than enough are.

ChumpDumper
12-08-2019, 03:51 AM
More than enough are.You didn't answer the question.

Are you saying all Muslims are cockroaches?

Yes or no.

Now I'm going to ask you this question a ninth time that you won't answer:

What do you want done about Saudi Arabia?

It's your Saudi Arabia thread.

If you refuse to answer you're just sperm shielding.

Spurtacular
12-08-2019, 04:13 AM
Go ahead and make a point if you have one.

ChumpDumper
12-08-2019, 04:14 AM
Stop begging, Chump. That's not how conversations work, psychopath.Of course it is.

People ask questions about the topic you started and you answer them.

You're just sperm shielding for Saudi Arabia.

Spurtacular
12-08-2019, 04:27 AM
Stop begging, Chump. That's not how conversations work, psychopath.


Of course it is.

:lmao

ChumpDumper
12-08-2019, 04:29 AM
:lmaoThere is no begging.

I asked you a question about the topic you brought up.

You're too afraid to answer.

Spurtacular
12-08-2019, 04:39 AM
There is no begging.

I asked you a question about the topic you brought up.

You're too afraid to answer.

Stop pleading. It's unbecoming.

ChumpDumper
12-08-2019, 04:42 AM
Stop pleading. It's unbecoming.There is no pleading.

I asked you a question about the topic you started.

You're too afraid to answer.

You're sperm shielding.'

Quit crying about it. You're free to abandon your thread since you're afraid to discuss it.

Or you can keep obsessing about me.

Spurtacular
12-08-2019, 04:44 AM
There is no pleading.

Begging, pleading, throwing a tantrum; whatever you want to call it.

ChumpDumper
12-08-2019, 04:47 AM
Begging, pleading, throwing a tantrum; whatever you want to call it.Why is asking you a question about your topic any of that?

Explain.

Spurtacular
12-08-2019, 04:53 AM
Why is asking you a question about your topic any of that?

Explain.

Beg if you must. It just makes you an irritant with bad social skills is all.

ChumpDumper
12-08-2019, 04:58 AM
Beg if you must. It just makes you an irritant with bad social skills is all.:lmao another question you're too afraid to answer

Do yourself a favor and stop making threads you're too afraid to participate in.

Winehole23
12-08-2019, 08:36 AM
Begging, pleading, throwing a tantrum; whatever you want to call it.
I call it refusing to have a discusssion about your own OP.


Your prerogative, weird tic though.

pgardn
12-08-2019, 11:00 AM
Our relationship with SA is fine.
They are allowed to execute WaPo reporters in the Turkish Embassy as well.

Cue slap lap on the wrist.
Or maybe a hearty congrats under this administration.
Allies... only the best people...the perfect phone call...

boutons_deux
12-08-2019, 11:03 AM
wonderful asshole DeSantis immediately "monetized" the murders by saying SA now owes FL a bunch of money.

TheGreatYacht
12-08-2019, 11:50 AM
https://mobile.twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1203691049794899969

ChumpDumper
12-08-2019, 11:59 AM
https://mobile.twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1203691049794899969

Why can't she answer her own question?

ChumpDumper
12-08-2019, 01:36 PM
Personally I would like to close the loophole that allowed this guy to legally buy a handgun because he had a hunting license:

An alien admitted to the United States under a nonimmigrant visa is prohibited from shipping, transporting, receiving, or possessing a firearm or ammunition unless the alien falls within one of the exceptions provided in 18 U.S.C. 922(y)(2), such as: a valid hunting license or permit, admitted for lawful hunting or sporting purposes, certain official representatives of a foreign government, or a foreign law enforcement officer of a friendly foreign government entering the United States on official law enforcement business.

[18 U.S.C. 922(g)(5)(B) and 922(y)(2); 27 CFR 478.11 and 478.32]

https://www.atf.gov/firearms/qa/may-nonimmigrant-alien-who-has-been-admitted-united-states-under-nonimmigrant-visa

I'm guessing derp is too afraid to take a stand on this issue.

ChumpDumper
12-08-2019, 01:38 PM
.

Spurtacular
12-08-2019, 02:05 PM
Personally I would like to close the loophole that allowed this guy to legally buy a handgun because he had a hunting license:

An alien admitted to the United States under a nonimmigrant visa is prohibited from shipping, transporting, receiving, or possessing a firearm or ammunition unless the alien falls within one of the exceptions provided in 18 U.S.C. 922(y)(2), such as: a valid hunting license or permit, admitted for lawful hunting or sporting purposes, certain official representatives of a foreign government, or a foreign law enforcement officer of a friendly foreign government entering the United States on official law enforcement business.

[18 U.S.C. 922(g)(5)(B) and 922(y)(2); 27 CFR 478.11 and 478.32]

https://www.atf.gov/firearms/qa/may-nonimmigrant-alien-who-has-been-admitted-united-states-under-nonimmigrant-visa

I'm guessing derp is too afraid to take a stand on this issue.

I forget, where did you come down on administering the lie detector detests?

Spurtacular
12-08-2019, 02:06 PM
https://mobile.twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1203691049794899969
ChumpDumper

Solid leadership, amirite?

ChumpDumper
12-08-2019, 02:15 PM
I forget, where did you come down on administering the lie detector detests?I said they're pretty useless. You were too stupid to notice.

Where do you come down on this loophole that allowed this guy to buy a handgun legally with a hunting license?

Are you for the loophole or against it?

ChumpDumper
12-08-2019, 02:16 PM
ChumpDumper

Solid leadership, amirite?Not really. Pretty weak sauce.

Do you agree with her criticism of Trump?

Yes or no.

Spurtacular
12-08-2019, 04:03 PM
I said they're pretty useless.

:lmao :cry Lie detector tests don't work :cry
:lmao Fucking psychopath

Spurtacular
12-08-2019, 04:03 PM
Not really. Pretty weak sauce.

She called out Trump just like you did. I guess you're weak sauce, too.

ChumpDumper
12-08-2019, 04:09 PM
:lmao :cry Lie detector tests don't work :cry
:lmao Fucking psychopath
Why aren't they admissable in court, derp?

Explain.

ChumpDumper
12-08-2019, 04:10 PM
She called out Trump just like you did. I guess you're weak sauce, too.No. I wouldn't have stopped where she did.

Do you agree with her calling out Trump?

Yes or no.

Spurtacular
12-08-2019, 04:10 PM
I call it refusing to have a discusssion about your own OP.


Your prerogative, weird tic though.

Who cares what you call it. You're aiding and abetting his spamming.

ElNono
12-08-2019, 04:12 PM
FBI announced they're looking at this as a terror case, tbh... just saw that.

Spurtacular
12-08-2019, 04:21 PM
No. I wouldn't have stopped where she did.

:cry She didn't cry enough to suit my TDS :cry
:cry Plus, I'm #StillWithHer :cry

:lmao

Spurtacular
12-08-2019, 04:21 PM
Why aren't they admissable in court, derp?

Explain.

Not because they're "useless", twat.

ChumpDumper
12-08-2019, 04:45 PM
Not because they're "useless", twat.

The courts certainly came to that conclusion.

That's why they are not admissible.

ChumpDumper
12-08-2019, 04:45 PM
:cry She didn't cry enough to suit my TDS :cry
:cry Plus, I'm #StillWithHer :cry

:lmao
Do you agree with her, derp?

Yes or no.

Spurtacular
12-08-2019, 04:49 PM
Do you agree with her, derp?

Yes or no.

It's the right call. And I don't have to equivocate cos I'm not #StillWithHer.

:rollin

Spurtacular
12-08-2019, 04:50 PM
The courts certainly came to that conclusion.

That's why they are not admissible.

Not admissible for court testimony doesn't mean "useless" for other applications, twat.

ChumpDumper
12-08-2019, 04:55 PM
It's the right call. And I don't have to equivocate cos I'm not #StillWithHer.

:rollin
Who made the right call?

Tulsi or Trump?

Make yourself clear.

ChumpDumper
12-08-2019, 04:56 PM
Not admissible for court testimony doesn't mean "useless" for other applications, twat.Pretty useless as I said.

What about the legal loophole that let this guy legally buy a gun?

Do you want that closed?

Yes or no.

Spurtacular
12-08-2019, 04:58 PM
Pretty useless as I said.

:cry Finding out if someone wants to perpetrate mass carnage against your country is useless :cry

:lmao CuckCuckier

Spurtacular
12-08-2019, 04:59 PM
Who made the right call?

Tulsi or Trump?

Make yourself clear.

I've already said that Tulsi is strong on this issue and Trump isn't.

Apparently you need some form of a tiny w really badly.

ChumpDumper
12-08-2019, 05:01 PM
:cry Finding out if someone wants to perpetrate mass carnage against your country is useless :cry

:lmao CuckCuckier
More effective ways to do that tbh.

You're too angry to think rationally.

ChumpDumper
12-08-2019, 05:01 PM
I've already said that Tulsi is strong on this issue and Trump isn't.

Apparently you need some form of a tiny w really badly.
What are you saying Trump should do besides lie detect:lolrs?

Spurtacular
12-08-2019, 05:07 PM
More effective ways to do that tbh.

So suddenly they're not "useless," psychopath.

Tell us about these more effective ways.

ChumpDumper
12-08-2019, 05:52 PM
So suddenly they're not "useless," psychopath.

Tell us about these more effective ways. They're useless, derp. Just like the courts say.

Monitoring communications if they want to train here. Much more effective.

So you admit Trump is wrong and weak on this issue. :lol

What are you saying he should do besides lie detectors?

Should he close the loophole that let this terrorist legally buy a handgun?

Yes or no.

boutons_deux
12-08-2019, 06:00 PM
Trump busted for acting like the Saudi’s ‘press secretary’ after Florida naval yard shooting

Boot noted that the typical mass shooting sentiments like “thoughts and prayers” were absent Friday when Trump discovered that the shooting was done by a Muslim.

“It turns out that Trump actually has a triple standard, because he treats attacks by Saudis differently than those from other Muslim nations,”

He also gave a “highly questionable” promise that the person didn’t represent the “feelings of the Saudi people who love the American people.”

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/12/trump-busted-for-acting-like-the-saudis-press-secretary-after-florida-naval-yard-shooting/

Spurtacular
12-08-2019, 06:32 PM
They're useless, derp. Just like the courts say.

Monitoring communications if they want to train here. Much more effective.

So you admit Trump is wrong and weak on this issue. :lol

What are you saying he should do besides lie detectors?

Should he close the loophole that let this terrorist legally buy a handgun?

Yes or no.

:lmao Court has made no such declarations of uselessness.
:lmao "Monitoring conversations"
:lmao Like these guys are doing public forums and saying they're gonna kill people.
:lmao Patriot Act failed.

ChumpDumper
12-08-2019, 07:20 PM
:lmao Court has made no such declarations of uselessness.Of course they have. They declared them inadmissible. Do you no what that means?

:lmao "Monitoring conversations"So you're explicitly lying about what I said.

:lmao Like these guys are doing public forums and saying they're gonna kill people.Who said public forums? White guys do that. More lies from you.

:lmao Patriot Act failed.What part of the Patriot Act applies here?

What are you saying Trump should do besides lie detectors?

Should he close the loophole that let this terrorist legally buy a handgun?

Yes or no.

TheGreatYacht
12-08-2019, 10:30 PM
https://mobile.twitter.com/RandPaul/status/1203727876627062785

Trump supporters please tell me why your president vetoed a bipartisan bill to stop selling weapons to Saudi Arabia so they can massacre civilian in Yemen

:spin

Spurtacular
12-08-2019, 10:53 PM
Of course they have. They declared them inadmissible. Do you no what that means?
So you're explicitly lying about what I said.
Who said public forums? White guys do that. More lies from you.
What part of the Patriot Act applies here?

What are you saying Trump should do besides lie detectors?

Should he close the loophole that let this terrorist legally buy a handgun?

Yes or no.

:lmao :cry We just need to do a better job of monitoring :cry




Another Saudi student allegedly videotaped the attack, while two others watched from a nearby car
The FBI have detained 10 Saudi students for questioning, but are still searching for 'several' others who have not been seen since the attack

ChumpDumper
12-08-2019, 11:02 PM
:lmao :cry We just need to do a better job of monitoring :cryDeeper background checks would mean monitoring communications....

Derp, what do you want Trump to do about Saudi Arabia?

Should he close the loophole that let this terrorist legally buy a handgun?

Yes or no.

Spurtacular
12-08-2019, 11:12 PM
Deeper background checks would mean monitoring communications....

Derp, what do you want Trump to do about Saudi Arabia?

Should he close the loophole that let this terrorist legally buy a handgun?

Yes or no.

What part of their background checks show that they're terrorists, idiot?

Spurtacular
12-08-2019, 11:13 PM
https://mobile.twitter.com/RandPaul/status/1203727876627062785

Trump supporters please tell me why your president vetoed a bipartisan bill to stop selling weapons to Saudi Arabia so they can massacre civilian in Yemen

:spin

CIA protection.

ChumpDumper
12-08-2019, 11:17 PM
What part of their background checks show that they're terrorists, idiot?Family and social ties. Communications.

Jesus derp. How fucking stupid are you?

Derp, what do you want Trump to do about Saudi Arabia?

Should he close the loophole that let this terrorist legally buy a handgun?

Yes or no.

Spurtacular
12-08-2019, 11:19 PM
Family and social ties. Communications.

So connecting a couple dots and making assumptions. And you think our overpaid bureaucrats are gonna be really good at that?

ChumpDumper
12-08-2019, 11:20 PM
So connecting a couple dots and making assumptions. And you think our overpaid bureaucrats are gonna be really good at that?They'll do their jobs.

You think they'll be great at interpreting lie detector tests.

Jesus derp. How fucking stupid are you?

Derp, what do you want Trump to do about Saudi Arabia?

Should he close the loophole that let this terrorist legally buy a handgun?

Yes or no.

Spurtacular
12-08-2019, 11:22 PM
They'll do their jobs.

:lol If they do, they'll pretty much ban de facto ban anyone from Saudi Arabia from coming over here.

ChumpDumper
12-08-2019, 11:23 PM
:lol If they do, they'll pretty much ban de facto ban anyone from Saudi Arabia from coming over here.Jesus derp. How fucking stupid are you?

Derp, what do you want Trump to do about Saudi Arabia?

Should he close the loophole that let this terrorist legally buy a handgun?

Yes or no.

Spurtacular
12-08-2019, 11:24 PM
Jesus derp. How fucking stupid are you?

Lashing out cos I called out your weak shit.

Spurtacular
12-08-2019, 11:25 PM
Should he close the loophole that let this terrorist legally buy a handgun?

No, I'm for not letting the fucking terrorist here in the first place.

ChumpDumper
12-08-2019, 11:26 PM
No, I'm for not letting the fucking terrorist here in the first place.But if they get here, let them buy all the guns they want.

Jesus derp. How fucking stupid are you?

Spurtacular
12-08-2019, 11:31 PM
But if they get here, let them buy all the guns they want.

Jesus derp. How fucking stupid are you?

If they get here, they're going to have the same rights as us if they haven't violated the law.

How fucking stupid are you?

ChumpDumper
12-08-2019, 11:33 PM
If they get here, they're going to have the same rights as us if they haven't violated the law.:lol they don't have the same rights for buying guns.

That's why they have different laws in the first place.

How fucking stupid are you?

Really fucking stupid.

Spurtacular
12-08-2019, 11:35 PM
:lol they don't have the same rights for buying guns.

That's why they have different laws in the first place.

How fucking stupid are you?

Really fucking stupid.

So, the second amendment won't apply to non citizens now? Pick a lane, Dump.

ChumpDumper
12-08-2019, 11:38 PM
So, the second amendment won't apply to non citizens now? Pick a lane, Dump.The US Code and Supreme Court already picked when it comes to non-immigrant aliens, derp.

I already referenced the law that applied to this terrorist.

You didn't read it because you're fucking stupid and obsessed with me.

Spurtacular
12-08-2019, 11:49 PM
The US Code and Supreme Court already picked when it comes to non-immigrant aliens, derp.

I already referenced the law that applied to this terrorist.

You didn't read it because you're fucking stupid and obsessed with me.

The Supreme Court already said select amendments don't apply to non citizens? :lol

ChumpDumper
12-08-2019, 11:52 PM
The Supreme Court already said select amendments don't apply to non citizens? :lolThe US Code and Supreme Court already picked when it comes to non-immigrant aliens, derp.

I already referenced the law that applied to this terrorist.

You quoted it but you didn't read it because you're too fucking stupid and obsessed with me.

Would you like a link to where you quoted and didn't read?

Yes or no.

Spurminator
12-08-2019, 11:54 PM
https://mobile.twitter.com/RandPaul/status/1203727876627062785

Trump supporters please tell me why your president vetoed a bipartisan bill to stop selling weapons to Saudi Arabia so they can massacre civilian in Yemen

:spin

Tell me why Rand Paul stands with President Trump on everything.

OOOOH but he tweeted....

Spurtacular
12-09-2019, 12:10 AM
The US Code and Supreme Court already picked when it comes to non-immigrant aliens, derp.

I already referenced the law that applied to this terrorist.

You quoted it but you didn't read it because you're too fucking stupid and obsessed with me.

Would you like a link to where you quoted and didn't read?

Yes or no.

:cry The Bill Of Some Rights, I'm tellin' ya :cry

:lmao Dump

ChumpDumper
12-09-2019, 12:12 AM
:cry The Bill Of Some Rights, I'm tellin' ya :cry

:lmao DumpThe US Code and Supreme Court already picked when it comes to non-immigrant aliens, derp.

I already referenced the law that applied to this terrorist.

You quoted it but you didn't read it because you're too fucking stupid and obsessed with me.

Would you like a link to where you quoted and didn't read?

Yes or no.

Spurtacular
12-09-2019, 12:14 AM
The US Code and Supreme Court already picked when it comes to non-immigrant aliens, derp.

I already referenced the law that applied to this terrorist.

You quoted it but you didn't read it because you're too fucking stupid and obsessed with me.

Would you like a link to where you quoted and didn't read?

Yes or no.

You either lay something down in the present or ya don't. Nobody's taking the word of a psychopath, Dump.

ChumpDumper
12-09-2019, 12:16 AM
You either lay something down in the present or ya don't. Nobody's taking the word of a psychopath, Dump.I already referenced the law that applied to this terrorist.

You quoted it but you didn't read it because you're too fucking stupid and obsessed with me.

Would you like a link to where you quoted and didn't read?

Yes or no.

Spurtacular
12-09-2019, 12:20 AM
I already referenced the law that applied to this terrorist.

You keep crying about that, and I'll keep not caring.

ChumpDumper
12-09-2019, 12:22 AM
You keep crying about that, and I'll keep not caring.Would you like a link to where you quoted and didn't read?

Yes or no.

Spurtacular
12-09-2019, 12:25 AM
Would you like a link to where you quoted and didn't read?

Yes or no.

Lay your sh** down.

ChumpDumper
12-09-2019, 12:27 AM
Just lay it down. Stop being passive aggressive if you think I should care.:lol afraid to answer another yes or no question.

https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=282264&p=10002902&viewfull=1#post10002902

You're fucking stupid.

And afraid.

Read it this time you fucking moron.

Spurtacular
12-09-2019, 12:29 AM
:lol afraid to answer another yes or no question.

https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=282264&p=10002902&viewfull=1#post10002902

You're fucking stupid.

And afraid.

Read it this time you fucking moron.

Cool. So, you're showing me that it's 'The Bill Of Some Rights,' according to some judges.

:lmao Remember that the next time you're crying about detained illegal aliens not being treated perfectly.

DMC
12-09-2019, 12:30 AM
Wow just look at Chumpy's conversational prowess on full display. Go get'em, champ. :lol

ChumpDumper
12-09-2019, 12:31 AM
Cool. So, you're showing me that it's 'The Bill Of Some Rights,' according to some judges.

:lmao Remember that the next time you're crying about detained illegal aliens not being treated perfectly."Some judges"?

This is black letter law.

Did you read it?

Yes or no.

DMC
12-09-2019, 12:32 AM
But if they get here, let them buy all the guns they want.

Jesus derp. How fucking stupid are you?


:lol they don't have the same rights for buying guns.

That's why they have different laws in the first place.

How fucking stupid are you?

Really fucking stupid.


The US Code and Supreme Court already picked when it comes to non-immigrant aliens, derp.

I already referenced the law that applied to this terrorist.

You didn't read it because you're fucking stupid and obsessed with me.


The US Code and Supreme Court already picked when it comes to non-immigrant aliens, derp.

I already referenced the law that applied to this terrorist.

You quoted it but you didn't read it because you're too fucking stupid and obsessed with me.

Would you like a link to where you quoted and didn't read?

Yes or no.


The US Code and Supreme Court already picked when it comes to non-immigrant aliens, derp.

I already referenced the law that applied to this terrorist.

You quoted it but you didn't read it because you're too fucking stupid and obsessed with me.

Would you like a link to where you quoted and didn't read?

Yes or no.


I already referenced the law that applied to this terrorist.

You quoted it but you didn't read it because you're too fucking stupid and obsessed with me.

Would you like a link to where you quoted and didn't read?

Yes or no.

Just a small sample of the depth of this poster, the sheer will to explore the far reaches of conversational technique, to break new ground in communication and comprehension, to actually evolve the language itself.

ChumpDumper
12-09-2019, 12:36 AM
Just a small sample of the depth of this poster, the sheer will to explore the far reaches of conversational technique, to break new ground in communication and comprehension, to actually evolve the language itself.
You're only going to post about me here.

Spurtacular
12-09-2019, 12:45 AM
"Some judges"?

This is black letter law.

Did you read it?

Yes or no.

Okay, I thought you said it was case law earlier. So what you're saying is that we should put our stock in an unconstitutional law.

Spurtacular
12-09-2019, 12:46 AM
You're only going to post about me here.

His observation is that you're a drone and a twerp. He's not wrong.

ChumpDumper
12-09-2019, 12:48 AM
Okay, I thought you said it was case law earlier. So what you're saying is that we should put our stock in an unconstitutional law.derp.

It's constitutional.

ChumpDumper
12-09-2019, 12:48 AM
His observation is that you're a drone and a twerp. He's not wrong.Aw, derp needs his widdle fwiend.

Spurtacular
12-09-2019, 12:50 AM
derp.

It's constitutional.

It's unconstitutional if you're of the belief that migrant are afforded the same rights as citizens. And that is the position of your ilk.

:cry But let me have it both ways :cry

lol Dump

ChumpDumper
12-09-2019, 12:51 AM
It's unconstitutional if you're of the belief that migrantStop right there and read the post again.

You completely whiffed.

Spurtacular
12-09-2019, 01:03 AM
Stop right there and read the post again.

You completely whiffed.

You whiffed, and you can't handle it. :cry :But muh unequal application of the Constitution :cry

lol Dump

ChumpDumper
12-09-2019, 01:08 AM
You whiffedIt's the law and it's constitutional.

Nothing you can do about it.

Spurtacular
12-09-2019, 01:16 AM
It's the law and it's constitutional.

Nothing you can do about it.

:cry The ends justifies the means :cry

Spoken like a true psychopath

lol Dump

ChumpDumper
12-09-2019, 01:18 AM
:cry The ends justifies the means :cry

Spoken like a true psychopath

lol DumpI said nothing about that.

I said it's law and it's constitutional.

And that your impotent whining doesn't' change that simple fact.

Spurtacular
12-09-2019, 01:21 AM
I said nothing about that.

I said it's law and it's constitutional.

And that your impotent whining doesn't' change that simple fact.

So, let's bring it back to the topic, Dump. You have literally dozens of Saudis infiltrating our military base; and they're killing us in the name of Islam.

ChumpDumper
12-09-2019, 01:33 AM
So, let's bring it back to the topic, Dump. You have literally dozens of Saudis infiltrating our military base; and they're killing us in the name of Islam.So do you.

You want them to be able to buy all the guns they can.

Spurtacular
12-09-2019, 01:35 AM
So do you.

You want them to be able to buy all the guns they can.

No, I want them not to be here in the first place.

ChumpDumper
12-09-2019, 01:36 AM
No, I want them not to be here in the first place.But if they get here, you guarantee they can buy guns.

You're just nice that way.

Spurtacular
12-09-2019, 01:42 AM
But if they get here, you guarantee they can buy guns.

Pesky Constitution.

ChumpDumper
12-09-2019, 01:48 AM
Pesky Constitution.The law is constitutional.

Spurtacular
12-09-2019, 01:50 AM
The law is constitutional.

So, illegal aliens don't have the same Constitutional rights as us after all. :tu

ChumpDumper
12-09-2019, 01:53 AM
So, illegal aliens don't have the same Constitutional rights as us after all. :tuSo you can't understand plain English.:tu

:lol trying to change your own subject.

Fucking moron.

Spurtacular
12-09-2019, 01:56 AM
So you can't understand plain English.:tu

:lol trying to change your own subject.

Fucking moron.

Chump lashing out cos he's getting called out on unequal application of the Constitution.

ChumpDumper
12-09-2019, 01:57 AM
Chump lashing out cos he's getting called out on unequal application of the Constitution.:lmao derp

You're simply wrong, dude.

Quit whining about it.

Fucking moron.

Spurtacular
12-09-2019, 02:04 AM
:lmao derp

You're simply wrong, dude.

Quit whining about it.

Fucking moron.

:lol More lashing out.

ChumpDumper
12-09-2019, 02:08 AM
:lol More lashing out.OK, derp.

Let's see your legal argument.

Cite your case law and legal theory.

Do that.

Or accept you're a fucking moron.

Spurtacular
12-09-2019, 02:11 AM
OK, derp.

Let's see your legal argument.

Cite your case law and legal theory.

Do that.

Or accept you're a fucking moron.

:lol :cry Cite cases even though you've already trashed me :cry

LOL Dump

ChumpDumper
12-09-2019, 02:14 AM
:lol :cry Cite cases even though you've already trashed me :cry

LOL DumpFucking moron derp folds.

lol fucking moron

Spurtacular
12-09-2019, 02:19 AM
Fucking moron derp folds.

lol fucking moron

There it is. Pretending you weren't just tapping out in a play to safe face.

lol Dump

ChumpDumper
12-09-2019, 02:22 AM
There it is. Pretending you weren't just tapping out in a play to safe face.

lol DumpI called you out you fucking moron.

You can't cite one case.

You can't cite one legal theory.

You folded.

You don't know how the law works.

You can't understand plain English.

You're a fucking moron.

spurraider21
12-09-2019, 02:24 AM
Cool. So, you're showing me that it's 'The Bill Of Some Rights,' according to some judges.

:lmao Remember that the next time you're crying about detained illegal aliens not being treated perfectly.
that code section is not about undocumented/illegal aliens. its specifically for aliens on non-immigrant visas. undocumented migrants do not enter under a nonimmigrant visa

Spurtacular
12-09-2019, 02:25 AM
that code section is not about undocumented/illegal aliens. its specifically for aliens on non-immigrant visas. undocumented migrants do not enter under a nonimmigrant visa

I realize that, Lite. My point is Chump is touting laws that treat persons as being unequal.

ChumpDumper
12-09-2019, 02:28 AM
I realize that, Lite. My point is Chump is touting laws that treat persons as being unequal.:lmao

You want another class to be equally unequal?

Spurtacular
12-09-2019, 02:29 AM
Chump making nonsensical claims; another face saving tactic he regularly uses.

ChumpDumper
12-09-2019, 02:30 AM
Chump making nonsensical claims; another face saving tactic he regularly uses.I know you are too stupid to understand.

That joke wasn't for you.

:lol fucking moron

Spurtacular
12-09-2019, 02:42 AM
I know you keep lashing out.

spurraider21
12-09-2019, 03:49 AM
It's unconstitutional if you're of the belief that migrant are afforded the same rights as citizens. And that is the position of your ilk.

:cry But let me have it both ways :cry

lol Dump
here's some good reading on the constitutionality of it, if you are interested in that subject matter


Aliens

Another provision of the Gun Control Act, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(5), prohibits unlawfully present aliens and most categories of nonimmigrant visa holders from possessing firearms. In determining whether the Second Amendment covers non-U.S. citizens, courts have looked to whether such persons come within the ambit of "the people" as used in the text of Second Amendment.223 (https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R44618.html#fn223) This inquiry has produced a circuit split. Some courts that have considered the issue have concluded that "the people" does not encompass unlawfully present aliens.224 (https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R44618.html#fn224) For instance, the Fifth Circuit in United States v. Portillo-Munoz recounted that the Supreme Court in Heller noted that "the people" include "law-abiding, responsible citizens" and "all members of the political community."225 (https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R44618.html#fn225) Because unlawfully present aliens fit neither description, the court concluded that they are granted no rights by the Second Amendment.226 (https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R44618.html#fn226) Moreover, to bolster its conclusion that the restriction in § 922(g)(5) is constitutional, the court added that "Congress has the authority to make laws governing the conduct of aliens that would be unconstitutional if made to apply to citizens."227 (https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R44618.html#fn227)

However, a number of circuit courts, while ultimately holding § 922(g)(5) to be constitutional, have opined that "the people," as used in the Second Amendment, could include some unlawfully present aliens.228 (https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R44618.html#fn228) For example, in United States v. Meza-Rodriguez, the Seventh Circuit analyzed § 922(g)(5) as applied to an alien who was brought the United States as a young child.229 (https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R44618.html#fn229) In determining whether the defendant was protected by the Second Amendment, the court analyzed the meaning of "the people."230 (https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R44618.html#fn230) Like the Fifth Circuit, the Seventh Circuit found that Heller links Second Amendment rights to law-abiding citizens, which, as someone who entered the country illegally, Meza-Rodriguez technically is not.231 (https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R44618.html#fn231) But the court also concluded that the Supreme Court was not defining "the people" when making that connection in Heller.232 (https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R44618.html#fn232) Accordingly, the Seventh Circuit relied on the Supreme Court's earlier opinion in United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez, which opined that "the people," for the purposes of protection under the First, Second, and Fourth Amendments, "refers to a class of persons who are part of a national community or who have otherwise developed sufficient connection with this country to be considered part of that community."233 (https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R44618.html#fn233) The defendant in Meza-Rodriguez met that standard because, the Seventh Circuit concluded, he had "extensive ties" with the United States, including his 20-year residency beginning as a child, attendance at U.S. public schools, and close family relationships with persons in the United States.234 (https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R44618.html#fn234) Nevertheless, the court held that § 922(g)(5) is constitutional, reasoning that the government made a strong showing that its interest in "prohibiting persons who are difficult to track and have an interest in eluding law enforcement" supports the firearm ban.235 (https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R44618.html#fn235)

Additionally, the Tenth Circuit in United States v. Huitron-Guizar assumed that unlawfully present aliens, like the defendant—who also had been in the United States for decades and was brought to the country as a young child—could assert a Second Amendment right, noting that "we hesitate to infer from Heller a rule that the right to bear arms is categorically inapplicable to non-citizens."236 (https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R44618.html#fn236) Applying intermediate scrutiny to § 922(g)(5), the court concluded that the law is constitutional, deferring to Congress's "constitutional power to distinguish between citizens and non-citizens, or between lawful and unlawful aliens, and to ensure safety and order."237 (https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R44618.html#fn237) Ultimately, the court found a substantial fit between the government's interests in crime control and public safety, and its desire to keep firearms out of the hands of those it deems as "irresponsible or dangerous."238 (https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R44618.html#fn238)

https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R44618.html

boutons_deux
12-09-2019, 07:16 AM
I read an instructor called the killer "porn stache".

Winehole23
12-10-2019, 01:14 PM
KSA paying off victims for "the shooting thing" sounds straight out of Sharia law:

1203422224721567745