Warocrats Don't Want To Support The One Person Who Can Beat Trump

[Spurtacular]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFRIGHcZkAI

Enjoy four more years, snowflakes.

[spurraider21]

How can she beat trump if nobody polls for her and nobody gives to her campaign?

why are you so enamored with somebody who wants Medicare for all, tighter financial regulations, higher taxes, $15 federal minimum wage, and is pro choice?

[Blake]

Op is a fucking idiot, tbh. What a retarded thread.

[Spurtacular]

How can she beat trump if nobody polls for her and nobody gives to her campaign?

why are you so enamored with somebody who wants Medicare for all, tighter financial regulations, higher taxes, $15 federal minimum wage, and is pro choice?

:cry She wants popular progressive stuff but isn't popular I say :cry

:lmao Lite

[Spurtacular]

Op is a fucking idiot, tbh. What a retarded thread.

Go tell Kori about it, cuck.

[spurraider21]

:cry She wants popular progressive stuff but isn't popular I say :cry

:lmao Lite
Why do you pimp her so much despite disagreeing with virtually her entire platform?

[DMC]

She can't beat Trump.

[DMC]

Why do you pimp her so much despite disagreeing with virtually her entire platform?

You already know the answer - because the left hates her.

[Spurtacular]

Why do you pimp her so much despite disagreeing with virtually her entire platform?

She's a strong leader that isn't a corporate puppet. That should be why you like her, but you're a puppet in your own right.

[Spurtacular]

You already know the answer - because the left hates her.

Yea, I'm not above it like you, amirite?

[Reck]

She can't beat Trump.

You voting Biden?

[TheGreatYacht]

Yea, I'm not above it like you, amirite?

I think you're a little more principled and less tribalist than DMC so I believe in your honest support of Tulsi Gabbard. I like her too.

[Spurtacular]

I think you're a little more principled and less tribalist than DMC (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=20665) so I believe in your honest support of Tulsi Gabbard. I like her too.

Most of my 'support' of Trump is just countering the Chumpettes' b*ll sh*t. Trump is the best response afforded to the people as the result of system BS. But that doesn't mean there haven't been possible better answers like Ron Paul and Tulsi Gabbard. Yes, Lite is correct in pointing out that she has positions that I'm not fond of with stuff like medicare for all. But he's assuming I'm going to find a candidate that checks all the boxes or else I can't find a significant value; he presumably knows that's horse sh*t and simply wants an out for his own support of the war candidates.

[Blake]

Go tell Kori about it, cuck.

I'm telling you. You're a fucking retarded piece of shit. Just saying.

[Spurtacular]

I'm telling you. You're a fucking retarded piece of shit. Just saying.

What's a matter, cuck? Can't get Kori to ban me?

[ChumpDumper]

Nobody wants to support her.

Especially not derp.

[Spurtacular]

Nobody wants to support her.

Especially not derp.

Especially not sperm shielders like you.

[ChumpDumper]

Especially not sperm shielders like you.Why don't you support her?

[Spurtacular]

Why don't you support her?

When did I say that I don't support her?

[ChumpDumper]

When did I say that I don't support her?Do you support her?

Yes or no.

[DMC]

Yea, I'm not above it like you, amirite?
I'm definitely not above it.

[DMC]

You voting Biden?

If he runs yes most likely. I can't vote for a woman.

[Spurtacular]

I'm definitely not above it.

Okay. Well I may have my biases, but I think I'm generally genuine in viewpoints unlike the well-known lemming class here.

[DMC]

I think they were fine with her until Hillary came out against her. Likewise I don't think anyone on the right gave two shits about her until then.

Granted she had a small amount of followers but Hillary really increased her visibility.

[Spurtacular]

If he runs yes most likely. I can't vote for a woman.

For why?

You're probably the one point two percent of America with that predisposition; so, I'm curious to know why you represent the scapegoat group for Hillary losing.

[DMC]

For why?

You're probably the one point two percent of America with that predisposition; so, I'm curious to know why you represent the scapegoat group for Hillary losing.

Well if he's running there's not a woman running

[Spurtacular]

I think they were fine with her until Hillary came out against her.

The writing was on the wall that she was the non-establishment candidate before Hillary further verified it.

[Spurtacular]

Well if he's running there's not a woman running

I thought you were saying you couldn't vote for a woman in general.

[Spurtacular]

Do you support her?

Yes or no.

I'm not doing a survey. When you find out how I don't support her, let me know.

[DMC]

The writing was on the wall that she was the non-establishment candidate before Hillary further verified it.

Yeah but since she's running the Democratic ticket she doesn't really have a chance. She will have to run as an independent to be a spoiler. Perhaps she will be a spoiler in favor of Biden.

[DMC]

I thought you were saying you couldn't vote for a woman in general.

No I think if Biden isn't the candidate then it will be a woman.

[ChumpDumper]

I'm not doing a survey. When you find out how I don't support her, let me know.derp folds about Tulsi in derp's own Tulsi thread.

lol derp

[Spurtacular]

Yeah but since she's running the Democratic ticket she doesn't really have a chance. She will have to run as an independent to be a spoiler. Perhaps she will be a spoiler in favor of Biden.

She would take away more Democrat votes than Republican votes, imo.

[Spurtacular]

derp folds about Tulsi in derp's own Tulsi thread.

lol derp

Go celebrate your pretend w.

[ChumpDumper]

Go celebrate your pretend w.You're afraid to say whether you support Tulsi or not in your own Tulsi thread.

[Spurtacular]

You're afraid to say whether you support Tulsi or not in your own Tulsi thread.

It's a good thing this thread isn't predicated on my support then.

[ChumpDumper]

It's a good thing this thread isn't predicated on my support then.Why are you afraid to answer?

[DMC]

She would take away more Democrat votes than Republican votes, imo.
No I mean if she doesn't run as an independent

[Spurtacular]

Why are you afraid to answer?

Why are you humping legs again?

[Reck]

She would take away more Democrat votes than Republican votes, imo.

You are delusional. She literally has no base.

She polls higher with Republicans than with democrats. That much has been proven already.

[Spurtacular]

You are delusional. She literally has no base.



Yea, she's hitting high tweet #'s for no reason at all.

[Spurtacular]

She polls higher with Republicans than with democrats.

Even if true, you're completely misusing the utility of such polls.

[ChumpDumper]

Why are you humping legs again?I'm asking you a question about Tulsi.

In your Tulsi thread.

:lol

[ChumpDumper]

Yea, she's hitting high tweet #'s for no reason at all.You believe in MASSIVE VOTE FRAUD but implicitly trust twitter stats.

:lol

[Spurtacular]

You believe in MASSIVE VOTE FRAUD but implicitly trust twitter stats.

:lol

Who said I trust twitter stats? In fact, by the day they're getting better at being able to manipulate their data.

But the implication of your statement is that Twitter would be cheating for Tulsi.

Of course you know that's a BS, implication; but you can't help yourself, compulsive psychopath attention whore.

[ElNono]

why are you so enamored with somebody who wants Medicare for all, tighter financial regulations, higher taxes, $15 federal minimum wage, and is pro choice?

If she really supports all this, she’s nothing like Ron Paul.

[Spurtacular]

I'm asking you a question about Tulsi.

In your Tulsi thread.

:lol

:cry I can ask anything Tulsi and demand answers; don't you know? :cry

lol Dump

[ChumpDumper]

Who said I trust twitter stats? In fact, by the day they're getting better at being able to manipulate their data.

But the implication of your statement is that Twitter would be cheating for Tulsi.

Of course you know that's a BS, implication; but you can't help yourself, compulsive psychopath attention whore.:lol no

I'm saying straight out you're an idiot.

[Spurtacular]

If she really supports all this, she’s nothing like Ron Paul.

They both are threats to the war machine. But yea, "nothing like Ron Paul".

:lol TheGreatYacht

[ChumpDumper]

:cry I can ask anything Tulsi and demand answers; don't you know? :cry

lol DumpYou're the one afraid to answer.

[Spurtacular]

:lol no

I'm saying straight out you're an idiot.

Blake Zero lashing out after getting shat on. Par.

[ChumpDumper]

Blake Zero lashing out after getting shat on. Par.That wasn't my implication, genius.

Try again.

You can do it.

[ElNono]

They both are threats to the war machine. But yea, "nothing like Ron Paul".

:lol TheGreatYacht

Ron just had many more problems, that’s why he was unelectable. IE: he has no idea what to do about healthcare in this country.

[Spurtacular]

Ron just had many more problems, that’s why he was unelectable. IE: he has no idea what to do about healthcare in this country.

What a surprise that you claim this because he didn't support your disastrous Obamacare.

[ElNono]

What a surprise that you claim this because he didn't support your disastrous Obamacare.

I didn’t like Obamacare when it passed or now. I preferred single-payor (still do). Feel free to dig up my posts from the time, I’m sure they’re still around.

Unfortunately, Ron Paul had no plan at all, other than ‘let’s get government out of everything’, which is incredibly shortsighted. That’s why libertarian candidates were always a waste of time.

[Spurtacular]

I didn’t like Obamacare when it passed or now. I preferred single-payor (still do). Feel free to dig up my posts from the time, I’m sure they’re still around.

Unfortunately, Ron Paul had no plan at all, other than ‘let’s get government out of everything’, which is incredibly shortsighted. That’s why libertarian candidates were always a waste of time.

This is Ron Paul sh*tting all over you, tbh.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pUBRuHZF1EU


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8T9fk7NpgIU
TheGreatYacht (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=43719)

[Th'Pusher]

This is Ron Paul sh*tting all over you, tbh.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pUBRuHZF1EU


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8T9fk7NpgIU
TheGreatYacht (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=43719)

Lol. The churches will take care of him.

[ElNono]

This is Ron Paul sh*tting all over you, tbh.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pUBRuHZF1EU


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8T9fk7NpgIU
TheGreatYacht (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=43719)

:lol that bottom video is exactly what I’m talking about. No plan whatsoever for the reality that a lot of people can’t have or afford healthcare. If he dies, he dies is not a plan :lmao

That’s exactly why he’s been always unelectable.

[ChumpDumper]

:lmao Wow, there's a reason derp never tries to back up his claims.

[DMC]

:lol that bottom video is exactly what I’m talking about. No plan whatsoever for the reality that a lot of people can’t have or afford healthcare. If he dies, he dies is not a plan :lmao

That’s exactly why he’s been always unelectable.

He said these church run hospitals don't turn people away. They'd have a massive medical bill, but they'd not be denied service. I don't think he was saying a church itself would bring him in and try to treat him. We all know Joel Olsteen locked his doors in Houston :lol

Still, never a fan of the guy because he never had a chance to do anything to act as a spoiler. In a basic 2 party system, these folks aren't so blind they think they can win an election as a 3rd party, but they'll damn sure play the role of spoiler or build their base. Only dude I know who introduced a bill then voted against it.

[ElNono]

He said these church run hospitals don't turn people away. They'd have a massive medical bill, but they'd not be denied service. I don't think he was saying a church itself would bring him in and try to treat him. We all know Joel Olsteen locked his doors in Houston :lol

Still, never a fan of the guy because he never had a chance to do anything to act as a spoiler. In a basic 2 party system, these folks aren't so blind they think they can win an election as a 3rd party, but they'll damn sure play the role of spoiler or build their base. Only dude I know who introduced a bill then voted against it.

His argument boils down to government should not care for anybody, no exceptions. It’s basically the antithesis of Bernie. The real world is much more complicated than that, and, again, that’s not a plan of any kind. My problems with guys like him or Bernie is that their propositions might sound valuable in a vacuum, but cannot exist in the real world. Not even the most fervent anti-government conservatives want any candidate to touch their Medicare or SS.

I commend him for sticking to his (unrealistic) principles, but discussions about him as a candidate are largely a waste of time. You can probably say the same thing for a good number of Bernie proposals.

[DMC]

His argument boils down to government should not care for anybody, no exceptions. It’s basically the antithesis of Bernie. The real world is much more complicated than that, and, again, that’s not a plan of any kind. My problems with guys like him or Bernie is that their propositions might sound valuable in a vacuum, but cannot exist in the real world. Not even the most fervent anti-government conservatives want any candidate to touch their Medicare or SS.

I commend him for sticking to his (unrealistic) principles, but discussions about him as a candidate are largely a waste of time. You can probably say the same thing for a good number of Bernie proposals.

Politics is full of ideologues with unrealistic goals. They aren't stupid. They are pandering to a group of people, like Trump did, to get elected or at least get campaign funding. I believe Ron Paul feels the way he claims to feel about it, but he know's it's not realistic because he was in medicine long enough to know it, and in congress long enough to damn sure know it.

[Spurtacular]

Politics is full of ideologues with unrealistic goals. They aren't stupid. They are pandering to a group of people, like Trump did, to get elected or at least get campaign funding. I believe Ron Paul feels the way he claims to feel about it, but he know's it's not realistic because he was in medicine long enough to know it, and in congress long enough to damn sure know it.

WTF you talking about? He's calling out insurance bureaucracy for fucking up the costs and quality. He's not wrong.

[Spurtacular]

His argument boils down to government should not care for anybody, no exceptions.

Free market care makes care affordable. That is "caring". The people that "care" are the ones driving up the prices. You don't like it because you're an ideologue.

[ElNono]

Politics is full of ideologues with unrealistic goals. They aren't stupid. They are pandering to a group of people, like Trump did, to get elected or at least get campaign funding. I believe Ron Paul feels the way he claims to feel about it, but he know's it's not realistic because he was in medicine long enough to know it, and in congress long enough to damn sure know it.

I don’t disagree, but why not be pragmatic about it? The reality is that in order to change things you first need to get to power. His son Rand is much less idealistic, but clearly more pragmatic. But he also clearly doesn’t have the fringe cult following his dad had (btw, as rabid as Bernie bros).

IMO, shooting yourself in the foot to stand for principle is really a bad way to do politics.

[Reck]

WTF you talking about? He's calling out insurance bureaucracy for fucking up the costs and quality. He's not wrong.

Do you even have a brain? For sure you like giving brain, but do you have one? Use it.

[pgardn]

I think you're a little more principled and less tribalist than DMC (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=20665) so I believe in your honest support of Tulsi Gabbard. I like her too.

Hah...

You use that term with this sperticule pervert.

[ElNono]

Free market care makes care affordable. That is "caring". The people that "care" are the ones driving up the prices. You don't like it because you're an ideologue.

Except the bastion of free market healthcare spends more in healthcare than the different forms of ‘socialized’ healthcare throughout the world, for just about the same outcomes. So your claim is factually incorrect, and it has zero to do with ideology.

Healthcare in this country is an absolutely political hot topic because it’s been leaving people behind for years. Again, pure facts.

[DMC]

I don’t disagree, but why not be pragmatic about it? The reality is that in order to change things you first need to get to power. His son Rand is much less idealistic, but clearly more pragmatic. But he also clearly doesn’t have the fringe cult following his dad had (btw, as rabid as Bernie bros).

IMO, shooting yourself in the foot to stand for principle is really a bad way to do politics.

If Ron is pragmatic, he loses his shtick. There are plenty pragmatic people who cannot get elected because they don't promise enough impossible shit. He's not doing to stand for principle. He's doing because his supporters are by and large uniformed and unrealistic.

Example about Ron Paul:

Thinks the federal government should sell all federal lands

Is against imminent domain

Result - No further infrastructure can ever exist since all land is 100% privately owned and people refuse to sell.

[TheGreatYacht]

This is Ron Paul sh*tting all over you, tbh.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pUBRuHZF1EU


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8T9fk7NpgIU
TheGreatYacht (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=43719)

I don't agree w his economic policies. They are terrible. Disastrous. But I love his foreign policy. I would vote for him over any establishment Democrat or Republican who is not a whore to the Jewish lobbies.

[Spurtacular]

Except the bastion of free market healthcare spends more in healthcare than the different forms of ‘socialized’ healthcare throughout the world, for just about the same outcomes. So your claim is factually incorrect, and it has zero to do with ideology.

Healthcare in this country is an absolutely political hot topic because it’s been leaving people behind for years. Again, pure facts.

I never claimed we have a free market system; you need to check your comprehension. And yea, our 'form of socialized healthcare' has f'd up a lot of stuff as you admit.

Healthcare is a hot topic because politicians are milking people in the name of healthcare. You think the people exploiting it are the ones who are going to fix it.

[ElNono]

If Ron is pragmatic, he loses his shtick. There are plenty pragmatic people who cannot get elected because they don't promise enough impossible shit. He's not doing to stand for principle. He's doing because his supporters are by and large uniformed and unrealistic.

Example about Ron Paul:

Thinks the federal government should sell all federal lands

Is against imminent domain

Result - No further infrastructure can ever exist since all land is 100% privately owned and people refuse to sell.

I think you mean eminent domain, but I get what you're saying. Plus, truth be told, it's easy to promise free shit. I'm a realist, not an ideologue.

[ElNono]

I never claimed we have a free market system; you need to check your comprehension. And yea, our 'form of socialized healthcare' has f'd up a lot of stuff as you admit.

Healthcare is a hot topic because politicians are milking people in the name of healthcare. You think the people exploiting it are the ones who are going to fix it.

What we have is the closest thing anybody will see to a free market. I've gone through this before, profit motive and general welfare sometimes don't go hand in hand. Happens also with the military.

Healthcare is a hot topic because almost half of the personal bankruptcies declared in this country are tied to healthcare. Because you or I have a cozy insurance doesn't mean everybody does (I didn't until relatively recently). People are really struggling with this stuff, and on top of that we have an insurance system that drops the most expensive patients straight to the government, while the government limits itself containing costs. Ron Paul wasn't against insurance companies (he even mentions getting a policy for care), he's against safety nets. Completely unrealistic babbling that ignores reality in this country.

[Spurtacular]

What we have is the closest thing anybody will see to a free market.

But not close at all.

[Spurtacular]

ElNono: We have socialize healthcare
ElNono: What we have is like free market healthcare

:lmao Amateur Hour

[ElNono]

But not close at all.

There's nothing closest to it because it doesn't work. Tell me what a utopia free market healthcare system would look like?

We already had a system that looked just for money and did extensive patient dumping because they couldn't pay. That's what the free market looked like back in the day. Makes sense for the bottom line, but it's completely inhumane.

That's why Reagan ended up having to enact EMTALA. And even that program was never enough. Patients get stabilized and sent back home without treating the underlying condition, which means further future visits.

Any type of healthcare reform needs to be comprehensive, and primarily address cost. That was my main criticism of Obamacare, it didn't tackle cost, and so we keep putting lipstick on a pig, and revisiting because it didn't solve the underlying problems.

[ElNono]

ElNono: We have socialize healthcare
ElNono: What we have is like free market healthcare

:lmao Amateur Hour

Why don't you quote me instead of lying? I said we're the "bastion of free market healthcare", and "the closest thing anybody will see to a free market". (actual quotes)

And it's absolutely true. Name me any other country that has a more 'free market', less 'socialized' healthcare than the US? It doesn't exist.

[Will Hunting]

Why don't you quote me instead of lying? I said we're the "bastion of free market healthcare", and "the closest thing anybody will see to a free market". (actual quotes)

And it's absolutely true. Name me any other country that has a more 'free market', less 'socialized' healthcare than the US? It doesn't exist.
Pretty sure Somalia, the ultimate free market utopia that conservatives should flock to, has more of a free market healthcare system than we do :lol

[Winehole23]

Side note: There's no free market whatsoever without a liberal (in the 19th century sense) legal framework. Free markets don't work without property rights and neutrally enforced contracts.

[Will Hunting]

Side note: There's no free market whatsoever without a liberal (in the 19th century sense) legal framework. Free markets don't work without property rights and neutrally enforced contracts.
I don’t disagree but that right there is why “the smaller the gubbamint, the better!” arguments are retarded.

[Winehole23]

I don’t disagree but that right there is why “the smaller the gubbamint, the better!” arguments are retarded.
They are.

Governments can be better or worse, but wishing for no government whatsoever is akin to pining for the law of the jungle.

[ElNono]

Pretty sure Somalia, the ultimate free market utopia that conservatives should flock to, has more of a free market healthcare system than we do :lol

We're talking places with actual healthcare :lol

[Spurtacular]

There's nothing closest to it because it doesn't work.

You have no fucking idea what works and what doesn't work.

[Spurtacular]

Why don't you quote me instead of lying? I said we're the "bastion of free market healthcare", and "the closest thing anybody will see to a free market". (actual quotes)

And it's absolutely true. Name me any other country that has a more 'free market', less 'socialized' healthcare than the US? It doesn't exist.

We're nowhere fucking close to free market regardless of whether anyone is closer or not.

[ElNono]

You have no fucking idea what works and what doesn't work.

Cool rebuttal. Lacking content, per par.


We're nowhere fucking close to free market regardless of whether anyone is closer or not.

Do tell what the utopian free market healthcare looks like. Second time question been asked, still empty handed.

[Spurtacular]

Cool rebuttal. Lacking content, per par.

Do tell what the utopian free market healthcare looks like. Second time question been asked, still empty handed.

The free market is the opposite of utopian, genius. And you just think more of the same is what works.

[spurraider21]

The free market is the opposite of utopian, genius. And you just think more of the same is what works.
:lol self ownage

[Spurtacular]

:lol self ownage

Utopian has the connotative meaning of everyone pitching in for the common good. That's the aspiration for socialized medicine.

Free market is look out for you and yours and let supply / demand keep the price right. It makes no promises of shitty safety nets.

[Blake]

Lol derp stepping all over himself when trying to define a utopian system.

Next he'll lash out that everyone else here is a chumpette lashing out.

[spurraider21]

Lol derp stepping all over himself when trying to define a utopian system.

Next he'll lash out that everyone else here is a chumpette lashing out.
potatoe 2.0

[DMC]

St Avengers assemble! :lol

[Blake]

St Avengers assemble! :lol

FAT HAND SHIELD ACTIVATE

[Spurtacular]

potatoe 2.0

NYT using the same alternative spelling in the same year, but that's a win for Lite. :lol

[spurraider21]

NYT using the same alternative spelling in the same year, but that's a win for Lite. :lol
fake news

[ElNono]

The free market is the opposite of utopian, genius. And you just think more of the same is what works.

Utopian means something so perfect it’s realistically impossible. What I asked of you is to describe the most perfect free market healthcare system you envision so we can discuss it’s connotations. ie: things like how does profit motive and fiduciary duty to shareholders, pillars of free market and capitalism, fit with prioritization of patient care, safety nets, etc.

[ChumpDumper]

fake news:lol derp dying on Potatoe Hill again.

[Spurtacular]

fake news

Nothing fake about it; I present the link at the time documenting that.

I'm sure honest Chump will back me up on that. :lol

[Spurtacular]

:lol derp dying on Potatoe Hill again.

:cry Go with the elitist line like I and the other minions do :cry

LOL Dump

[Spurtacular]

#CongressionalLeader
#SadChump


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=616EgM7bheQ

[spurraider21]

Nothing fake about it; I present the link at the time documenting that.

I'm sure honest Chump will back me up on that. :lol
Good to know that the NYT isn’t fake news and is acceptable as a source for you

[Spurtacular]

Good to know that the NYT isn’t fake news and is acceptable as a source for you

Just cos they're fake news they have to use fake spelling? :lol Nice philo, Lite. :lol Par.

:lmao System took alternative spelling out of the dictionary to prop up their false narrative.
:lmao Bringin' it back to the original point, you're the one that keeps spiking the football on this, not me.

[ChumpDumper]

:lmao so defensive

This shit really bothers you.

[DMC]

Philo arguing about the spelling of a vegetable during a missile attack :lmao

[spurraider21]

Philo arguing about the spelling of a vegetable during a missile attack :lmao
:lmao i made that post 22 hours ago

[ChumpDumper]

:lmao dumbass DMC

[Blake]

Philo arguing about the spelling of a vegetable during a missile attack :lmao

This is what happens when you just jump in the conversation without understanding context

[ChumpDumper]

This is what happens when you just jump in the conversation without understanding contextTrue. DMC needs to learn a little something about class.

[TheGreatYacht]

https://mobile.twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1214775329648041985

She can definitely defeat Trump. Easily.

[DMC]

:lmao i made that post 22 hours ago

The other Philo, just above my post.

[ChumpDumper]

The other Philo, just above my post.

Derp or the guy you say you have on ignore but are slavishly reading during a missile attack?

[Winehole23]

DMC with the fake solemnity

[DMC]

Derp or the guy you say you have on ignore but are slavishly reading during a missile attack?

You, dipshit.

I take the opportunity now and then to poke the circus monkey and watch you dance, then I close the shutters.

[DMC]

DMC with the fake solemnity

Something I'd never accuse you of.

[ChumpDumper]

You, dipshit.

I take the opportunity now and then to poke the circus monkey and watch you dance, then I close the shutters.
During a missile strike.

:lol DMC's priorities

[DMC]

During a missile strike.

:lol DMC's priorities

I knew it was just a symbolic gesture and I said so. I guess you're 6th Street Experience didn't help you this time.

[ChumpDumper]

I knew it was just a symbolic gesture and I said so. I guess you're 6th Street Experience didn't help you this time.*your

Also, wut?

[DMC]

:yield

[ChumpDumper]

DMC declares victory.

Are you saying this attack was OK after the alleged imminent attack that didn't happen wasn't?

Use your words.

[TheGreatYacht]

https://mobile.twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1216341616149123079
BOOOOOOOOM

[ChumpHumper]

You, dipshit.

I take the opportunity now and then to poke the circus monkey and watch you dance, then I close the shutters.

Present.

[Spurtacular]

Philo arguing about the spelling of a vegetable during a missile attack :lmao


This is what happens when you just jump in the conversation without understanding context

He literally spelled out the context, ya dumb fucking ankle biter cuck.