Rand Paul threatens fellow Republicans with explosive witness votes

[ducks]

https://www.yahoo.com/news/rand-paul-threatens-fellow-republicans-232752792.html




Yep lots of witnesses or none!

[Reck]

so when is the first murder trial with no witnesses going to take place? Rape trial where the rapist gets commended instead?

[Spurs Homer]

https://www.yahoo.com/news/rand-paul-threatens-fellow-republicans-232752792.html





Yep lots of witnesses or none!

no worries

put all of them on the stand

incl trump

[ChumpDumper]

https://www.yahoo.com/news/rand-paul-threatens-fellow-republicans-232752792.html




Yep lots of witnesses or none!What's wrong with witnesses in a trial where Trump is totes innocent?

[ElNono]

Ron rolling in his grave right now

[koriwhat]

Ron rolling in his grave right now

You mean his bed right?

[RandomGuy]

What's wrong with witnesses in a trial where Trump is totes innocent?

Nothing at all.

Lets get those fact witnesses that Republicans have been crying about.

Trials have witnesses, coverups don't...

[cool cat]

What's wrong with witnesses in a trial where Trump is totes innocent?

Dems had enough evidence to impeach why would there need to be more witness? Needing more witnesses would mean the Dems did a bad job.

[ChumpDumper]

Dems had enough evidence to impeach why would there need to be more witness? Needing more witnesses would mean the Dems did a bad job.:lol that's not how trials work.

There has never been an impeachment trial without witnesses.

And those witnesses should be able to totally exonerate Dennison if he did nothing wrong.

[thispego]

so when is the first murder trial with no witnesses going to take place? Rape trial where the rapist gets commended instead?

You’re talking about real crimes though :lol

[ChumpDumper]

You’re talking about real crimes though :lolEh, the GAO just said he in fact broke the law.

I know you can't care, so post some denial.

[cool cat]

:lol that's not how trials work.

There has never been an impeachment trial without witnesses.

And those witnesses should be able to totally exonerate Dennison if he did nothing wrong.

:lol the trial is set however the Senate wants it to.

There has never been an impeachment without bipartisan votes before either.

If the Dems did a good job you wouldn’t need anymore witnesses:lol

[ChumpDumper]

:lol the trial is set however the Senate wants it to.

There has never been an impeachment without bipartisan votes before either.

If the Dems did a good job you wouldn’t need anymore witnesses:lol:lol We've never had so many toadies in the Republican party before.

It's amazing that they and you don't care about anything but protecting Dennison, who wouldn't piss on any of you if you were on fire. :lmao

[Winehole23]

:lol the trial is set however the Senate wants it to.

There has never been an impeachment without bipartisan votes before either.

If the Dems did a good job you wouldn’t need anymore witnesses:lolDJT and Pompeo blocked the witnesses and stonewalled requests for documents.

You call that Dems doing a bad job, for some reason

[thispego]

Eh, the GAO just said he in fact broke the law.

I know you can't care, so post some denial.

The GAO :lol the most bipartisan of watchdog groups, I’m sure lmao

[Reck]

You’re talking about real crimes though :lol

Every trial whether criminal, civil or otherwise has witnesses.

[ChumpDumper]

The GAO :lol the most bipartisan of watchdog groups, I’m sure lmaoNonpartisan is the word you're looking for -- and if you're going to claim it's biased, go ahead and back that up with something more than innuendo.

[cool cat]

DJT and Pompeo blocked the witnesses and stonewalled requests for documents.

You call that Dems doing a bad job, for some reason

No dems already voted to impeach, you insinuating that they need more witnesses means they did a bad job. :lol

[ChumpDumper]

No dems already voted to impeachThat was before the vote. :lol

You don't even know what's going on. :lol

You're doing a bad job. :lol

[boutons_deux]

No dems already voted to impeach, you insinuating that they need more witnesses means they did a bad job. :lol

Goddamn, you're fucking stupid.

House Dems had fantastically incriminating witnesses.

Now they want witnesses at the actual trial of Trash.

[cool cat]

That was before the vote. :lol

You don't even know what's going on. :lol

You're doing a bad job. :lol

What?? You been drinking or something. Dems voted to impeach, before the vote??? WTF you even talking about. You have spent to much time on Spurstalk time to take a break:lol

[ChumpDumper]

What?? You been drinking or something. Dems voted to impeach, before the vote???:lmao Now you can't even understand simple sentences. You been drinking or something? Try another screen name.

[cool cat]

:lmao Now you can't even understand simple sentences. You been drinking or something? Try another screen name.

:lol no need to explain your drunken mess just copy what cool cat says :rofl

[ChumpDumper]

:lol no need to explain your drunken mess just copy what cool cat says :roflWitnesses were called before the impeachment vote.:lol

:lol You don't even understand that.

:lmao Third person.

[cool cat]

Witnesses were called before the impeachment vote.:lol

:lol You don't even understand that.

:lmao Third person.

Show me where I said they weren’t:lol

Sorry, show cool cat where I said they weren’t :king

[ChumpDumper]

Show me where I said they weren’tSo what are you trying to argue?

[thispego]

Nonpartisan is the word you're looking for -- and if you're going to claim it's biased, go ahead and back that up with something more than innuendo.

Nah. Bipartisan is the correct term here.

(Intellectually superior! :lmao)

[Winehole23]

No dems already voted to impeach, you insinuating that they need more witnesses means they did a bad job. :lolThey put together a solid case despite Trump's stonewalling. It would be weird to have a trial without the testimony of those directly involved, though.

[ChumpDumper]

Nah. Bipartisan is the correct term here.Nope.

Are you claiming they are biased?

Yes or no.

[thispego]

Nope.

Are you claiming they are biased?

Yes or no.

Yep.

They are objective as they want to be

[ChumpDumper]

Yep.

They are objective as they want to beWhat is your proof of this?

My guess is you never heard of them before today.

[cool cat]

So what are you trying to argue?

:lol you drunk ass i'm not arguing, you said


That was before the vote. :lol

You don't even know what's going on. :lol

You're doing a bad job. :lol

Nothing you said here connects with my post that you quoted.

Take a day off Spurstalk, sober up, it's ok.

[ChumpDumper]

:lol you drunk ass i'm not arguing, you said



Nothing you said here connects with my post that you quoted.

Take a day off Spurstalk, sober up, it's ok.The witnesses were called before the vote.

What part do you not understand?

[cool cat]

The witnesses were called before the vote.

What part do you not understand?

:lol drunk ass what part don't you understand? I never said they weren't called.

[ChumpDumper]

No dems already voted to impeach:lmao Not before they had already called witnesses.

[cool cat]

:lmao

OH MY GOD... your reading comprehensive is terrible. Winehole said I made the claim that "Dems did a bad job". My answer was "No dems already voted to impeach".

You even left out the part where I said "If they need more witnesses" Which means I already know they called witness. https://aa.org/ they can help you.

comprehensive... now I may be drunk.

[thispego]

What is your proof of this?

My guess is you never heard of them before today.

Awesome timing, seems so impartial, on the eve of the senate trial. Crazy timing, what are the chances? :lol

Their “finding” is also incorrect because the president is allowed to withhold foreign aid for policy priorities at his discretion, for a period of time, without approval from Congress.

[ChumpDumper]

Awesome timing, seems so impartial, on the eve of the senate trial. Crazy timing, what are the chances? :lol

Their “finding” is also incorrect because the president is allowed to withhold foreign aid for policy priorities at his discretion, for a period of time, without approval from Congress.
:lol that isn't evidence of partisan bias

[ElNono]

You mean his bed right?

If he dies, he dies

[koriwhat]

If he dies, he dies

:lol

[MultiTroll]

Dems had enough evidence to impeach why would there need to be more witness? Needing more witnesses would mean the Dems did a bad job.

[ChumpDumper]

So calling for any witnesses in any case means you have a bad case?

:lmao backflipping rubes