Biden President 2020 MEGATHREAD

[Nathan89]

Oh I see.

You just go after Biden.

But not Trump or Kavanaugh.

These are not the actions of a hypocrite.
Gotcha.

Biden is getting his bullshit leftist standard applied to him.

[Nathan89]

That can be worked out. There is no reason not to selectively look for anything relating to her and her alone.

The issue here is that his distractors want the full Biden archive.

That cant happen.

Mika suggested it and Biden couldn't comprehend such a request. Perhaps it can be worked out but that just you saying "it can be worked out". Nothing Biden said suggested that.

[TSA]

https://twitter.com/ITGuy1959/status/1256225695329595392

[Reck]

IT Guy with the goods.

[baseline bum]

https://twitter.com/ITGuy1959/status/1256225695329595392

Biden just has to make a calendar to show off and he's good. Or don't and just admit to sexual assault and he's good.

[Spurtacular]

Biden just has to make a calendar to show off and he's good. Or don't and just admit to sexual assault and he's good.

Do you really believe that bitch (Ford) wasn't making shit up?

[TSA]

IT Guy with the goods.

https://twitter.com/jameshohmann/status/1256248901948059650

WaPo with the goods.

[TSA]

Do you really believe that bitch (Ford) wasn't making shit up?Blasey-Ford's testimony was laughable.

"Blasey Ford had no evidence she had ever met Kavanaugh, much less that he had tried to rape her. She wasn’t sure about any detail related to the event other than that she had precisely one beer and that Kavanaugh had tried to rape her.

She didn’t know how she got to the alleged event, where it was, how she got home, or whose house it was. None of the four witnesses she identified to reporters as having been at the event in question supported her claim. That included her close friend Leland Keyser, who was pressured by mutual acquaintances to change her testimony that she had no recollection of the event in question."

https://thefederalist.com/2020/05/01/democrats-are-reaping-the-whirlwind-kavanaugh-warned-about/#.XqxGaJJ4YMk.twitter

But this isn't about who's story is more believable. They could both be lying for all I care. This is about the total hypocrisy from the left now that Biden is in the crosshairs.

[Reck]

https://twitter.com/jameshohmann/status/1256248901948059650

WaPo with the goods.

The core of her allegations are possibly legit. The touching of hair, neck etc is very believable.

The finger blasting rape-a-thon, is not. You lose credibility when you change your story about 3 times from sexual harrassment to sexual assault to full on rape.

[boutons_deux]

Trash assaulted 15+ women who went on video, and Christians still voted him, since for evangelicals, electing Trash to hurt women through govt and law is more important than Trash's assaults.

I bet Trash hung around with Epstein since he knew he could get some sweet, underage pussy.

Kavanaugh had an emotional breakdown in his job interview before the Senate.

NO company would hire him after that pathetic performance. But "failing upwards" in fundamental to Repugs.

Dems did not assume K was guilty and had plenty of evidence.

K lied to Congress to get his earlier Federal bench job, and should be impeached and removed. 2021 would not be too soon.

[ChumpDumper]

I fully believe Reade's first story.

[baseline bum]

Blasey-Ford's testimony was laughable.

"Blasey Ford had no evidence she had ever met Kavanaugh, much less that he had tried to rape her. She wasn’t sure about any detail related to the event other than that she had precisely one beer and that Kavanaugh had tried to rape her.

She didn’t know how she got to the alleged event, where it was, how she got home, or whose house it was. None of the four witnesses she identified to reporters as having been at the event in question supported her claim. That included her close friend Leland Keyser, who was pressured by mutual acquaintances to change her testimony that she had no recollection of the event in question."

https://thefederalist.com/2020/05/01/democrats-are-reaping-the-whirlwind-kavanaugh-warned-about/#.XqxGaJJ4YMk.twitter

But this isn't about who's story is more believable. They could both be lying for all I care. This is about the total hypocrisy from the left now that Biden is in the crosshairs.

Get the fuck out of here with your hypocrisy talk when you all of a sudden only now care about sexual assault.

[Spurminator]

After over a month of the allegations being out the media finally asked him directly :rollin

https://twitter.com/jason_howerton/status/1256206815152476162

Yep, covering this more than the Trump allegations, like I said already. Good talk!

[Spurminator]

Get the fuck out of here with your hypocrisy talk when you all of a sudden only now care about sexual assault.

The world's worst hypocrites love to talk about hypocrisy.

[Spurtacular]

Blasey-Ford's testimony was laughable.

"Blasey Ford had no evidence she had ever met Kavanaugh, much less that he had tried to rape her. She wasn’t sure about any detail related to the event other than that she had precisely one beer and that Kavanaugh had tried to rape her.

She didn’t know how she got to the alleged event, where it was, how she got home, or whose house it was. None of the four witnesses she identified to reporters as having been at the event in question supported her claim. That included her close friend Leland Keyser, who was pressured by mutual acquaintances to change her testimony that she had no recollection of the event in question."

https://thefederalist.com/2020/05/01/democrats-are-reaping-the-whirlwind-kavanaugh-warned-about/#.XqxGaJJ4YMk.twitter

But this isn't about who's story is more believable. They could both be lying for all I care. This is about the total hypocrisy from the left now that Biden is in the crosshairs.


WReck (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=14412)'d

[Reck]

WReck (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=14412)'d

Your and TSA's fantasy. Both known for being retards here.

[Spurtacular]

Your and TSA's fantasy. Both known for being retards here.

Tell me where he went wrong?

[Spurtacular]

Get the fuck out of here with your hypocrisy talk when you all of a sudden only now care about sexual assault.
Blake (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=3460)line bum

[Spurtacular]

I fully believe Reade's first story.

Which is?

[pgardn]

Biden is getting his bullshit leftist standard applied to him.

Sorry thats not enough.

It did not get applied to Trump or Kavanaugh.

[RandomGuy]

Biden is getting his bullshit leftist standard applied to him.

Good. Leftists are vastly less hypocritical. The moral high ground has its uses.

Right ceded that when they elected a pussy-grabbing child rapist, so I will be happy to ding Biden all day long.

[Reck]

Tell me where he went wrong?

The retarded claim that ford didn't even know Kavanaugh. :lol

A lot of hassle for not even meeting or knowing the guy. She went under oath, bro. Perjuring yourself can land you in jail for years just to make an accusation about someone you didn't even meet. :lmao

[RandomGuy]

The core of her allegations are possibly legit. The touching of hair, neck etc is very believable.

The finger blasting rape-a-thon, is not. You lose credibility when you change your story about 3 times from sexual harrassment to sexual assault to full on rape.

Especially when you story appears to be lifted out of your father's book.

Dunno. I am less and less inclined to believe this person.

[ChumpDumper]

Which is?:lol you didn't read it when I explicitly told you the first time yesterday.

[TSA]

Get the fuck out of here with your hypocrisy talk when you all of a sudden only now care about sexual assault.

My stance hasn't changed, I've repeatedly said I believed neither accusation. You're a hypocrite, just own it and vote for Biden.

[TSA]

If you care to actually watch the full interview instead of cherry picking tweets

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=seu_C08yAAM

Cuckoo cuckoo. Fly little pelican!

https://twitter.com/NicoleEinbinder/status/1256216361941872641

The National Archives wouldn't have the complaint, the complaint would be held at the University of Delaware.

Nice try though :lol

[pgardn]

Do you really believe that bitch (Ford) wasn't making shit up?

Absolutely she was truthful imo.

And Kavanaugh was lying through his teeth with fake outrage especially when asked about his alcohol and parties.
This is so fckn easy. Say yeah I drank, yes I partied. BUT... doing what this lady has said I did to her is way beyond drinking or partying, not even in the ballpark.

INSTEAD: He concentrates on an issue that he should just give in on and starts this outrage against EXCESSIVE drinking because he really does not consider his drinking excessive which I totally believe him on. He purposely shows outrage concerning subjects that really ARE NOT true instead of the real issue. A person that was innocent WOULD clearly bring the issue back to the woman and the allegation constantly. I mean, you did not do it, fck the drinking and partying, its all side crap.

I personally have seen this tactic too many times and recognize it quite well. He is a fckin liar. imo... In my world he is THE classic liar.

And how the fck do you have ANY insight into females incel boy? The only woman you know is your mom.

[baseline bum]

My stance hasn't changed, I've repeatedly said I believed neither accusation. You're a hypocrite, just own it and vote for Biden.

Bullshit you're not a hypocrite with all this posting about Biden's accusation while radio silence about our Dear Leader who actually bragged about it. Of course I'm going to vote for Biden. Am I supposed to vote for Trump? How can sexual assault be a litmus test against Biden when your boy admitted to the same shit?

[pgardn]

https://twitter.com/NicoleEinbinder/status/1256216361941872641

The National Archives wouldn't have the complaint, the complaint would be held at the University of Delaware.

Nice try though :lol

Sorry there are conversations with a president and VP which is sensitive executive shit.

Again, ever heard this before you fckn hypocrite?

[Spurminator]

We love to post for hours about things we don't believe, don't we folks? It's what normal people love to do.

[boutons_deux]

then and now

https://media.breitbart.com/media/2020/04/tara-reade-headshot-640x480.jpg


https://starswiki.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Tara-Reade.jpg

aging is sadistically cruel to some

[Spurtacular]

:lol you didn't read it when I explicitly told you the first time yesterday.

If you said it, I missed it.

What is her "first version," according to you?

[Spurtacular]

The retarded claim that ford didn't even know Kavanaugh. :lol

A lot of hassle for not even meeting or knowing the guy. She went under oath, bro. Perjuring yourself can land you in jail for years just to make an accusation about someone you didn't even meet. :lmao

Amateur analysis. She wasn't going to get indicted on perjury regardless of what the truth of the matter is.

[pgardn]

then and now

https://media.breitbart.com/media/2020/04/tara-reade-headshot-640x480.jpg


https://starswiki.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Tara-Reade.jpg

aging is sadistically cruel to some

That makes the argument boots.
Great job.
Get down to the level of the opponent.

asshole...

[Spurtacular]

Absolutely she was truthful imo.

And Kavanaugh was lying through his teeth with fake outrage especially when asked about his alcohol and parties.
This is so fckn easy. Say yeah I drank, yes I partied. BUT... doing what this lady has said I did to her is way beyond drinking or partying, not even in the ballpark.

INSTEAD: He concentrates on an issue that he should just give in on and starts this outrage against EXCESSIVE drinking because he really does not consider his drinking excessive which I totally believe him on. He purposely shows outrage concerning subjects that really ARE NOT true instead of the real issue. A person that was innocent WOULD clearly bring the issue back to the woman and the allegation constantly. I mean, you did not do it, fck the drinking and partying, its all side crap.

I personally have seen this tactic too many times and recognize it quite well. He is a fckin liar. imo... In my world he is THE classic liar.

And how the fck do you have ANY insight into females incel boy? The only woman you know is your mom.

You're unhinged.

She lied, bitch boy.

[Spurtacular]

That makes the argument boots.
Great job.
Get down to the level of the opponent.

asshole...

Get a hold of yourself.

[Nathan89]

Sorry thats not enough.

It did not get applied to Trump or Kavanaugh.

I can point to a shitload of senators and media outlets that applied that standard to Kavenaugh.

[ChumpDumper]

If you said it, I missed it.You sure did...and you kept on arguing with me....:lol

[pgardn]

You're unhinged.

She lied, bitch boy.

Like you would know any bitchy incel boy.
You are the LAST person on this site to be trusted with any sort of judgement about people you refuse to be with.

And I love it ... you protecting boots who is a big a hypocrite as you are. He is your blue side, good job.

[ChumpDumper]

I can point to a shitload of senators and media outlets that applied that standard to Kavenaugh.So your argument is two wrongs make a right.

[Nathan89]

Absolutely she was truthful imo.

And Kavanaugh was lying through his teeth with fake outrage especially when asked about his alcohol and parties.
This is so fckn easy. Say yeah I drank, yes I partied. BUT... doing what this lady has said I did to her is way beyond drinking or partying, not even in the ballpark.

INSTEAD: He concentrates on an issue that he should just give in on and starts this outrage against EXCESSIVE drinking because he really does not consider his drinking excessive which I totally believe him on. He purposely shows outrage concerning subjects that really ARE NOT true instead of the real issue. A person that was innocent WOULD clearly bring the issue back to the woman and the allegation constantly. I mean, you did not do it, fck the drinking and partying, its all side crap.

I personally have seen this tactic too many times and recognize it quite well. He is a fckin liar. imo... In my world he is THE classic liar.

And how the fck do you have ANY insight into females incel boy? The only woman you know is your mom.

Thanks for letting us know how all innocent people react.

[Reck]

Amateur analysis. She wasn't going to get indicted on perjury regardless of what the truth of the matter is.

How do you know that?

Republicans held the house then so they would have done so if she did. They weren't going to protect her. :lol Amateur analysis there, derp.

[pgardn]

I can point to a shitload of senators and media outlets that applied that standard to Kavenaugh.

Oh yeah and that got them where...
A partyline vote.

You will take Biden if he wins just like you slurp Trump.
You will take it and you will like it.
I lose either way, but yes I will go against the proven lying narcissistic incompetent incumbent.

[Spurtacular]

You sure did...and you kept on arguing with me....:lol

Cool. Can we skip past you spiking the ball on your big tiny W and you tell me what Ford's first version was according to you?

[pgardn]

Thanks for letting us know how all innocent people react.

Qualification based just on being around people is something you cant use.
So im filling in.

This is exactly how liars use anger. Misdirect it.

[Spurtacular]

How do you know that?

Republicans held the house then so they would have done so if she did. They weren't going to protect her. :lol Amateur analysis there, derp.

If she got indicted for saying she met someone thirty some odd years ago when she hadn't, she would be the first.

[ChumpDumper]

Cool. Can we skip past you spiking the ball on your big tiny W and you tell me what Ford's first version was according to you?She got mad when she was asked to serve drinks at a function and quit.

[Nathan89]

So your argument is two wrongs make a right.

I'm not declaring his guilt. Most aren't really applying the same standard that the left has advocated for. Most are focusing on the left and propaganda pushers being hypocrites. That's mostly what I've focused on. Now I'm just entertained by him squirming when after weeks he is finally questioned on the issue.

[pgardn]

I'm not declaring his guilt. Most aren't really applying the same standard that the left has advocated for. Most are focusing on the left and propaganda pushers being hypocrites. That's mostly what I've focused on. Now I'm just entertained by him squirming when after weeks he is finally questioned on the issue.

He should do more than squirm if he really did this.
He should go to jail.

[ChumpDumper]

I'm not declaring his guilt. Most aren't really applying the same standard that the left has advocated for. Most are focusing on the left and propaganda pushers being hypocrites. That's mostly what I've focused on. Now I'm just entertained by him squirming when after weeks he is finally questioned on the issue.You're enjoying the second wrong because of your partisanship.

[Nathan89]

Oh yeah and that got them where...
A partyline vote.

You will take Biden if he wins just like you slurp Trump.
You will take it and you will like it.
I lose either way, but yes I will go against the proven lying narcissistic incompetent incumbent.

Yes, because they were in the minority.

[Nathan89]

You're enjoying the second wrong because of your partisanship.

I'm enjoying the lefts comeuppance.

[ChumpDumper]

I'm surprised Reade didn't keep a copy of her complaint since she for sure filed one.

[pgardn]

Yes, because they were in the minority.

Yes.
It was overwhelming was it not?

[ChumpDumper]

I'm enjoying the lefts comeuppance.Because of your partisanship.

[Chris]

Biden said he didn't want his records released because it could damage his Presidential campaign.

Reck: How is that bad?

:rollin

lmao

[Chris]

So, instead of America First, Biden would rather America Last?

Biden wants to give taxpayer money to other countries, so he can funnel it back to the DNC and his pockets.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/benshapiro/status/1256295078458359808?s=19

uh oh :lol

[Chris]

OFSHanjEnME

[Reck]

I'm enjoying the lefts comeuppance.

It's not a comeuppance if nothing comes off it. Nothing will come of this.

It certainly not going to cost him the election. Trump for instance won the presidency on the back of 20 sexual assault alegation and he's actually on tape saying he did grab pussy.

[Reck]

:lmao the right will fuck the one allegation from Reade by muddling the water and bringing underage assaults into this. :tu

[Nathan89]

It's not a comeuppance if nothing comes off it. Nothing will come of this.

It certainly not going to cost him the election. Trump for instance won the presidency on the back of 20 sexual assault alegation and he's actually on tape saying he did grab pussy.

It's not even the same standard because people aren't all declaring guilt based on accusation. I'm speaking very loosely on the matter.

[ChumpDumper]

“President Putin has an alluring combination of strength with gentleness. His sensuous image projects his love for life, the embodiment of grace while facing adversity.”

:lol

[Nathan89]

https://twitter.com/benshapiro/status/1256295078458359808?s=19

uh oh :lol

"This isn't going to stop me from riding into the voter booth on my moral high horse and dinging Biden."

[pgardn]

I'm enjoying the lefts comeuppance.

?

Doesnt the comeuppance occur when the digging finds more evidence to try him and then convict him?

[pgardn]

"This isn't going to stop me from riding into the voter booth on my moral high horse and dinging Biden."

Just like you did for Trump.

Grabbing that pssy because he can...

[Chris]

"This isn't going to stop me from riding into the voter booth on my moral high horse and dinging Biden."

Media is a helluva drug.

https://media1.tenor.com/images/ccd5e9a3c060d749d27e2d153f7b24ef/tenor.gif?itemid=5414311

[pgardn]

FOX news, the most popular TV for news.

Yep, that media...

Chris
gotta say you are the best at nothingness.
Good job Christian soldier.

[Splits]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGGAgljengs&feature=emb_logo

[Nathan89]

"For a woman to come forward in the glaring lights of focus, nationally, you’ve got to start off with the presumption that at least the essence of what she’s talking about is real, whether or not she forgets facts, whether or not it’s been made worse or better over time.”

- Joe Biden

[Reck]

MAGA got their marching orders.

[Nathan89]

https://twitter.com/DavidAFrench/status/1256288033105678345?s=20

Time to rethink leftist policy that seeks to destroy the lives of men based on accusations.

Also this is a good article about the tough situation the left/Biden has put themselves in.

[ChumpDumper]

"For a woman to come forward in the glaring lights of focus, nationally, you’ve got to start off with the presumption that at least the essence of what she’s talking about is real, whether or not she forgets facts, whether or not it’s been made worse or better over time.”

- Joe BidenI totally believe her first story.

[TSA]

Absolutely she was truthful imo.

And Kavanaugh was lying through his teeth with fake outrage especially when asked about his alcohol and parties.
This is so fckn easy. Say yeah I drank, yes I partied. BUT... doing what this lady has said I did to her is way beyond drinking or partying, not even in the ballpark.

INSTEAD: He concentrates on an issue that he should just give in on and starts this outrage against EXCESSIVE drinking because he really does not consider his drinking excessive which I totally believe him on. He purposely shows outrage concerning subjects that really ARE NOT true instead of the real issue. A person that was innocent WOULD clearly bring the issue back to the woman and the allegation constantly. I mean, you did not do it, fck the drinking and partying, its all side crap.

I personally have seen this tactic too many times and recognize it quite well. He is a fckin liar. imo... In my world he is THE classic liar.

And how the fck do you have ANY insight into females incel boy? The only woman you know is your mom.:lol absolutely truthful

"Blasey Ford had no evidence she had ever met Kavanaugh, much less that he had tried to rape her. She wasn’t sure about any detail related to the event other than that she had precisely one beer and that Kavanaugh had tried to rape her.

She didn’t know how she got to the alleged event, where it was, how she got home, or whose house it was. None of the four witnesses she identified to reporters as having been at the event in question supported her claim. That included her close friend Leland Keyser, who was pressured by mutual acquaintances to change her testimony that she had no recollection of the event in question."

[TSA]

Bullshit you're not a hypocrite with all this posting about Biden's accusation while radio silence about our Dear Leader who actually bragged about it. Of course I'm going to vote for Biden. Am I supposed to vote for Trump? How can sexual assault be a litmus test against Biden when your boy admitted to the same shit?

My posting on this hasn’t been ACL out the accusation itself, but has been to point out the hypocrisy of the left and their reaction to the allegation, yourself included. I’m not a hypocrite, and it’s really pissing you off. :lol

[baseline bum]

My posting on this hasn’t been ACL out the accusation itself, but has been to point out the hypocrisy of the left and their reaction to the allegation, yourself included. I’m not a hypocrite, and it’s really pissing you off. :lol

You know I like you TSA, but fuck off with this heads I win, tails you lose bullshit. :lol

[ChumpDumper]

Let's revisit Reade's initial story.

A Nevada County woman has added her voice to a recent spate of allegations that former vice president and possible presidential candidate Joe Biden touched her when she worked in his U.S. Senate office.

Alexandra Tara Reade said that in 1993 she was in her mid-20s when Biden, then a senator from Delaware, touched her several times making her feel uncomfortable. Reade said her responsibilities in the senator’s office were reduced after she refused to serve drinks at an event — what she called a desire of Biden’s because he liked her legs. Reade said she felt pushed out and left Biden’s employ in August 1993 after some nine months.

A spokesman for Biden couldn’t be reached for comment.

“He used to put his hand on my shoulder and run his finger up my neck,” Reade said. “I would just kind of freeze and wait for him to stop doing that.”

A confidant of Reade’s at the time, granted anonymity by The Union, confirmed that Reade relayed the story shortly after the events occurred.

“Back then, back there, things just happened,” the friend said.

Reade is the most recent woman to publicly share her story about uncomfortable encounters with Biden. Time.com states former Nevada State Assemblywoman Lucy Flores told her story last week. Flores said Biden approached her at a 2014 campaign rally and kissed the back of her head. A second woman, Amy Lappos, said Biden touched her face and rubbed noses with her at a 2009 fundraiser.

Caitlyn Caruso said Biden put his hand on her thigh and hugged her at a university event. D.J. Hill said Biden in 2012 touched her shoulder before moving his hand down her back.

Other women have defended Biden in the wake of recent allegations against him. Stephanie Carter, wife of former Defense Secretary Ash Carter, appeared in a photo used in a misinformation campaign against Biden. She called the former vice president a close friend in a USA Today story.

Biden in a Wednesday tweet said he understands social norms are changing.

“And I’ve heard what these women are saying,” Biden’s tweet states. “Politics to me has always been about making connections, but I will be more mindful about respecting personal space in the future. That’s my responsibility and I will meet it.”

ALLEGATIONS

Employment documents provided by Reade show that she worked in Biden’s office from December 1992 to August 1993.

Reade recalled a handful of times Biden touched her. On one occasion they were before a group of interns when he put his finger on her neck. She doesn’t remember how many times Biden touched her in that manner, she said.

“I was trying to be seen as a professional,” Reade added.

Reade said her expulsion from Biden’s office stemmed from an early 1993 staff argument over the suggestion she serve drinks at an event. According to Reade, Biden wanted her to serve because he liked her legs. Reade didn’t hear Biden make that suggestion, instead learning of it through his staff’s argument. Reade opted against serving drinks, a move she believes sidelined her career.

The friend in whom Reade confided at the time said they discussed Biden. Reade asked her friend if she should take any action. Being young and relatively new to D.C., she wondered if anything was wrong with Biden’s behavior.

The confidant said she asked if Reade would let her younger sister work in the office. When Reade said “no” to the hypothetical question, her friend said Biden’s actions weren’t appropriate.

Reade said she spoke to U.S. Senate personnel about her concerns. Word got back to Biden’s office.

“My life was hell,” Reade said. “This was about power and control.”

“I couldn’t get a job on the Hill,” she added.

In June 1993 Reade found herself in an office without windows. Two months later she left Biden’s office, she said.

Reade said Biden’s senior staff protected the senator. She was considered a distraction. Reade said she didn’t consider the acts toward her sexualization. She instead compared her experience to being a lamp.

“It’s pretty. Set it over there,” she said. “Then when it’s too bright, you throw it away.”

Reade said she tried to share her story when she worked for Biden, but was told to say nothing. Then Biden ran on Barack Obama’s ticket. Reade thought he may have changed.

Reade said she rethought her years-long role as a foot solider for the Democratic Party when she learned of Flores’ disclosure.

She wants more than “Sorry” from Biden.

“‘I changed the trajectory of your life,’” she wants to hear him say. “‘I’m sorry.’

https://www.theunion.com/news/nevada-county-woman-says-joe-biden-inappropriately-touched-her-while-working-in-his-u-s-senate-office/

I don't see anything about finger banging.

[Reck]

“‘I changed the trajectory of your life,’” she wants to hear him say. “‘I’m sorry.’


This is such a woman thing to pull. YOU DIDN'T SAY SORRY SO I'M GOING TO SAY YOU RAPED!

If all she was looking was a sorry, then she could have probably gone an entirely different route. But let's involve the press, police and possibly the presidency on it.

:lmao

[Chris]

https://media.giphy.com/media/QE3fmo40WMu9W/giphy.gif

[Reck]

Non applicable gif. Try the captcha again, bot.

[ChumpDumper]

This is such a woman thing to pull. YOU DIDN'T SAY SORRY SO I'M GOING TO SAY YOU RAPED!

If all she was looking was a sorry, then she could have probably gone an entirely different route. But let's involve the press, police and possibly the presidency on it.

:lmaoI totally believe the legs and drinks story, especially since she admits she didn't hear any of it from Biden himself.

That would also explain why Reade has no record of her complaint to the Senate, or at least claims she doesn't.

[ChumpDumper]

I mean she's a lawyer and a victims' rights advocate. It's just odd that she kept all her senate employment records but not any record of her written complaint to the senate personnel office. Now 27 years later she makes a complaint to the DC police but doesn't name Biden as her attacker in it? Just weird.

[TSA]

You know I like you TSA, but fuck off with this heads I win, tails you lose bullshit. :lol

You're good peeps too Bum...but what did you expect to hear after the bullshit Kavanaugh went through. And I'm not even calling Biden a finger blasting rapist as I don't believe Reade's claim. I'm not claiming any moral high ground either but with the position I've taken on both accusations (liars) I sure as fuck am going to rub your face in this one for the blatant hypocrisy :lol

[Splits]

Biden got his pinky wetPERIOD

[monosylab1k]

MAGA got their marching orders.

As if the Bidentards aren’t following their own :lol

[Nathan89]

This is such a woman thing to pull. YOU DIDN'T SAY SORRY SO I'M GOING TO SAY YOU RAPED!

If all she was looking was a sorry, then she could have probably gone an entirely different route. But let's involve the press, police and possibly the presidency on it.

:lmao

Some would call you a sexist for comments like that. Welcome to the right, Reck.:chestbump

[Spurtacular]

She got mad when she was asked to serve drinks at a function and quit.

That's just the tipping point after she had been relegated.

:lmao "first version"
:lmao Psychopav

[Chris]

https://media.giphy.com/media/QE3fmo40WMu9W/giphy.gif

[Spurtacular]

You know I like you TSA, but fuck off with this heads I win, tails you lose bullshit. :lol

That's sort of how it goes when you bet on losers, Blake (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=3460)line bum.

[Will Hunting]

This is such a woman thing to pull. YOU DIDN'T SAY SORRY SO I'M GOING TO SAY YOU RAPED!
This looks like a comment pulled right out of the playbook of ways Republicans defended Kavanaugh.

[boutons_deux]

Just weird.

maybe just financial. Like banker Mellon-Scaife financing Paula Jones sueing Clinton.

I think also paid for her cosmetic surgery make over

I expect the Repugs, experts in the black arts politics of personal destruction, are behind, to some extent, Tara Reade.

At very least it's a distraction from the Trump-made Trump Pandemic

[ChumpDumper]

That's just the tipping point after she had been relegated.OK, I believe that too.

Now what?

Do you believe her story she was sexually assaulted by Biden?

Yes or no.

derp folds

lol

[Winehole23]

You're good peeps too Bum...but what did you expect to hear after the bullshit Kavanaugh went through. And I'm not even calling Biden a finger blasting rapist as I don't believe Reade's claim. I'm not claiming any moral high ground either but with the position I've taken on both accusations (liars) I sure as fuck am going to rub your face in this one for the blatant hypocrisy :lolhow was baseline bum hypocritical?

[Spurtacular]

Let's revisit Reade's initial story.

A Nevada County woman has added her voice to a recent spate of allegations that former vice president and possible presidential candidate Joe Biden touched her when she worked in his U.S. Senate office.

Alexandra Tara Reade said that in 1993 she was in her mid-20s when Biden, then a senator from Delaware, touched her several times making her feel uncomfortable. Reade said her responsibilities in the senator’s office were reduced after she refused to serve drinks at an event — what she called a desire of Biden’s because he liked her legs. Reade said she felt pushed out and left Biden’s employ in August 1993 after some nine months.

A spokesman for Biden couldn’t be reached for comment.

“He used to put his hand on my shoulder and run his finger up my neck,” Reade said. “I would just kind of freeze and wait for him to stop doing that.”

A confidant of Reade’s at the time, granted anonymity by The Union, confirmed that Reade relayed the story shortly after the events occurred.

“Back then, back there, things just happened,” the friend said.

Reade is the most recent woman to publicly share her story about uncomfortable encounters with Biden. Time.com states former Nevada State Assemblywoman Lucy Flores told her story last week. Flores said Biden approached her at a 2014 campaign rally and kissed the back of her head. A second woman, Amy Lappos, said Biden touched her face and rubbed noses with her at a 2009 fundraiser.

Caitlyn Caruso said Biden put his hand on her thigh and hugged her at a university event. D.J. Hill said Biden in 2012 touched her shoulder before moving his hand down her back.

Other women have defended Biden in the wake of recent allegations against him. Stephanie Carter, wife of former Defense Secretary Ash Carter, appeared in a photo used in a misinformation campaign against Biden. She called the former vice president a close friend in a USA Today story.

Biden in a Wednesday tweet said he understands social norms are changing.

“And I’ve heard what these women are saying,” Biden’s tweet states. “Politics to me has always been about making connections, but I will be more mindful about respecting personal space in the future. That’s my responsibility and I will meet it.”

ALLEGATIONS

Employment documents provided by Reade show that she worked in Biden’s office from December 1992 to August 1993.

Reade recalled a handful of times Biden touched her. On one occasion they were before a group of interns when he put his finger on her neck. She doesn’t remember how many times Biden touched her in that manner, she said.

“I was trying to be seen as a professional,” Reade added.

Reade said her expulsion from Biden’s office stemmed from an early 1993 staff argument over the suggestion she serve drinks at an event. According to Reade, Biden wanted her to serve because he liked her legs. Reade didn’t hear Biden make that suggestion, instead learning of it through his staff’s argument. Reade opted against serving drinks, a move she believes sidelined her career.

The friend in whom Reade confided at the time said they discussed Biden. Reade asked her friend if she should take any action. Being young and relatively new to D.C., she wondered if anything was wrong with Biden’s behavior.

The confidant said she asked if Reade would let her younger sister work in the office. When Reade said “no” to the hypothetical question, her friend said Biden’s actions weren’t appropriate.

Reade said she spoke to U.S. Senate personnel about her concerns. Word got back to Biden’s office.

“My life was hell,” Reade said. “This was about power and control.”

“I couldn’t get a job on the Hill,” she added.

In June 1993 Reade found herself in an office without windows. Two months later she left Biden’s office, she said.

Reade said Biden’s senior staff protected the senator. She was considered a distraction. Reade said she didn’t consider the acts toward her sexualization. She instead compared her experience to being a lamp.

“It’s pretty. Set it over there,” she said. “Then when it’s too bright, you throw it away.”

Reade said she tried to share her story when she worked for Biden, but was told to say nothing. Then Biden ran on Barack Obama’s ticket. Reade thought he may have changed.

Reade said she rethought her years-long role as a foot solider for the Democratic Party when she learned of Flores’ disclosure.

She wants more than “Sorry” from Biden.

“‘I changed the trajectory of your life,’” she wants to hear him say. “‘I’m sorry.’

https://www.theunion.com/news/nevada-county-woman-says-joe-biden-inappropriately-touched-her-while-working-in-his-u-s-senate-office/

I don't see anything about finger banging.

Why are you qualifying this random article as the first version?

[TSA]

how was baseline bum hypocritical?

Ask him when he’s not so salty.

[Spurtacular]

OK, I believe that too.

Now what?

Do you believe her story she was sexually assaulted by Biden?

Yes or no.

derp folds

lol

There's a lot of noise out there. People like you trying to confuse matters.
I'm waiting until I've determined the veracity of matters before arriving at a judgment.

[Spurtacular]

This is such a woman thing to pull. YOU DIDN'T SAY SORRY SO I'M GOING TO SAY YOU RAPED!

If all she was looking was a sorry, then she could have probably gone an entirely different route. But let's involve the press, police and possibly the presidency on it.

:lmao


This looks like a comment pulled right out of the playbook of ways Republicans defended Kavanaugh.

I don't remember any Repub lashing out against women that hard, tbh.

[Winehole23]

Ask him when he’s not so salty.As so oft, an excuse, I asked you.

[TSA]

https://mobile.twitter.com/TheBabylonBee/status/1256357814294974468

[Winehole23]

I don't remember any Repub lashing out against women that hard, tbh.

[TSA]

As so oft, an excuse, I asked you.

Ask me when you’re not so salty.

[Reck]

https://mobile.twitter.com/TheBabylonBee/status/1256357814294974468

Umm no.

[Reck]

Ok TSA got me using one of Boots shitty tactics.

[ChumpDumper]

There's a lot of noise out there. People like you trying to confuse matters.
I'm waiting until I've determined the veracity of matters before arriving at a judgment.derp folds

Blames others for folding.

Her stories are all out there.

Pick one you want to believe because you can't believe all of them.

[Chris]

Umm no.

lol

[Winehole23]

Ask me when you’re not so salty.You don't know salty, sir.

This is me relaxing with a beer after a long drive. Unwinding, you might say.

[Spurtacular]

derp folds

Blames others for folding.

Her stories are all out there.

Pick one you want to believe because you can't believe all of them.

Potential inconsistencies doesn't mean that Creepy Joe is innocent, you fucking psychopath.

[Chris]

Alcohol is the Devil's drink.

[ChumpDumper]

Potential inconsistencies doesn't mean that Creepy Joe is innocent, you fucking psychopath.It means she lied one way or the other. Just depends on what you decide she lied about.

Don't act like you'll ever decide, derp.:lol

[Reck]

Alcohol is the Devil's drink.

You drink it anyways.

[Spurtacular]

It means she lied one way or the other. Just depends on what you decide she lied about.

Post her lies.

[Spurtacular]

Don't act like you'll ever decide, derp.:lol

I'm not a psychopath like you. I don't get to state whatever truth is convenient for me.
As such, I will not rush to judgment.

[boutons_deux]

The Troublesome Tara Reade Story

Left- and right-wing Biden haters demanded that the media investigate her sexual assault charge.

It did—and uncovered many reasons to doubt.

#MeToo movement was “Believe women.”

The point was to give women’s accounts of sexual assault a fair and respectful hearing:

first, hopefully, by police;

or, if she made her claim to the media, by reporters.

Reporters have done just that with Tara Reade.

Her allegation against Biden doesn’t stand up to close scrutiny.

And bullying by the left or right won’t change that.

https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/tara-reade-joe-biden-democrats/ (https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/tara-reade-joe-biden-democrats/)

that's the take from the left.

Like "butter emails" and "Benghazi", the right wing hate and slander machine doesn't deal with or care about the truth

[ChumpDumper]

Post her lies.First she said she wasn't sexually assaulted.

Then she did.

It doesn't matter. You're never going to make a call on this one.

All you're going to do is cry about men here and bump the threads you made about us.

[spurraider21]

https://mobile.twitter.com/TheBabylonBee/status/1256357814294974468
just tried it right now. no correction.

[Reck]

Post her lies.

Why do you always ask others to do your job for you? Whenever you are asked to explain something you fold. Expect others to explain things in granular details for you.

It's simple. She lied about the severity of this incident.

[ChumpDumper]

I'm not a psychopath like you. I don't get to state whatever truth is convenient for me.
As such, I will not rush to judgment.You're never going to read anything about her many stories.

You're never going to make up your mind.

You're going to cry about me.

That's all.

[spurraider21]

omg the censorship is realzz

https://i.gyazo.com/0d1f474ff915bd0c0e211c26e43b2604.png

[Reck]

Ok TSA (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=7640) got me using one of Boots shitty tactics.


just tried it right now. no correction.

:lol TSA in desperation mode.

[Winehole23]

Alcohol is the Devil's drink.
Made by people, for people.

In olden times, safer to drink than water. Maybe in the future too.

[Chris]

just tried it right now. no correction.

whoooosh :lol

[Chris]

Made by people, for people.

In olden times, safer to drink than water. Maybe in the future too.

Alcohol is the Devil's drink.

[Winehole23]

Alcohol is the Devil's drink.

Well if that ain't all about a Chick Tract. If you only know one thing, I guess you're doomed to repeat it forever.

[ElNono]

Important he jumped in on this, and unequivocally made his point. Clearly isn't going to convince TSA or Qhris, but, realistically, nobody really cares what they think anyways.

[Chris]

Important he jumped in on this, and unequivocally made his point. Clearly isn't going to convince TSA or Qhris, but, realistically, nobody really cares what they think anyways.

I wonder what George Carlin would think about it if he were still alive.

[Chris]

Well if that ain't all about a Chick Tract. If you only know one thing, I guess you're doomed to repeat it forever.

Pick your poison then.

[ElNono]

Important he jumped in on this, and unequivocally made his point. Clearly isn't going to convince TSA or Qhris, but, realistically, nobody really cares what they think anyways.


I wonder what George Carlin would think about it if he were still alive.

^ Exhibit A

[Chris]

You were stealing his shit.

[ElNono]

Nope. And sorry to hear the whole George shtick didn't catch on either, keep participating.

[Chris]

Nope. And sorry to hear the whole George shtick didn't catch on either, keep participating.

It's between me and you. I know you know. You know that I know. I know that you know that I know.

[spurraider21]

if you wanted a joke-stealing shtick for elnono carlos would have been a better one. mencia was a mexican joke stealer too

[ElNono]

if you wanted a joke-stealing shtick for elnono carlos would have been a better one. mencia was a mexican joke stealer too

what happened to that guy? Guess he made his money and moved on...

[Spurtacular]

First she said she wasn't sexually assaulted.

She said no such thing.

[Spurtacular]

Why do you always ask others to do your job for you? Whenever you are asked to explain something you fold. Expect others to explain things in granular details for you.

It's simple. She lied about the severity of this incident.

So like Chump you don't have any lies to post; but you're more than happy to hide under the veneer of 'she's telling lies'.

[ChumpDumper]

She said no such thing.Oh, where did she say she was sexually assaulted in the first interview?

Quote it.

[Spurtacular]

You're never going to read anything about her many stories.

You're never going to make up your mind.

You're going to cry about me.

That's all.

I have looked at this quite a bit. I know that certain entities are running interference for Biden.
The fact that you and reck are holding onto pretend lies is showing me that you guys are scared for what it's worth.

[ChumpDumper]

She said no such thing."...this is not a story about sexual misconduct."

--Alexandra Tara Reade
April, 17 2019

[ChumpDumper]

I have looked at this quite a bit.Then you know the above quote is true.:tu

[Spurminator]

just tried it right now. no correction.

FYI Babylon Bee is The Onion for people who think The Onion is too racy.

[Spurtacular]

"...this is not a story about sexual misconduct."

--Alexandra Tara Reade
April, 17 2019

Give me the full quote. I know your propensity for taking things out of context.

[Spurtacular]

Then you know the above quote is true.:tu

First I've seen it. I did see this in the original Union article.



Reade said Biden’s senior staff protected the senator. She was considered a distraction. Reade said she didn’t consider the acts toward her sexualization. She instead compared her experience to being a lamp.

The corporate lobbyist seems rather eager to speak for TR and put words in her mouth in a proactive attempt to do damage control for Creepy Joe.

[ChumpDumper]

Give me the full quote. I know your propensity for taking things out of context.You never saw this?

:lol so much for looking at this "quite a bit."

I did not like Joe Biden’s hand on me not for the reasons you think, it is because I am the alpha in the room too. Again, I like to be the one who chooses who enters my space and in what way.

We are sexual beings and we are all trying to figure out how to express this aspect of ourselves at work and home lives, it is a journey our society is on right now. But this is not a story about sexual misconduct; it is a story about abuse of power. It is a story about when a member of Congress allows staff to threaten or belittle or bully on their behalf unchecked to maintain power rather than modify the behavior.

--Alexandra Tara Reade
April, 17 2019

There you have it. She explicitly said Joe committed no sexual misconduct before she said he did.

[pgardn]

:lol absolutely truthful

"Blasey Ford had no evidence she had ever met Kavanaugh, much less that he had tried to rape her. She wasn’t sure about any detail related to the event other than that she had precisely one beer and that Kavanaugh had tried to rape her.

She didn’t know how she got to the alleged event, where it was, how she got home, or whose house it was. None of the four witnesses she identified to reporters as having been at the event in question supported her claim. That included her close friend Leland Keyser, who was pressured by mutual acquaintances to change her testimony that she had no recollection of the event in question."

Thats bullshit.

She knew exactly who he was and she did tell close friends.

Add to that the way he reacted...
Go after her. Bring it back to her. Keep pounding SHE is recalling everything all wrong. He does not do this. He concentrates on the minutiae they got wrong.

Lets get upset at irrelevant bullshit " do you drink beer Senator?"
This is the biggest wtf witness that is begging to get off the real story: What SHE has accused him off. Does he try to bring it back, absolutely not. He gets himself all worked up with rants of how they got his nickname all wrong?

Thats an utter bullshit liar right there. She has accused me? of forcibly putting her on a bed and holding her down and he goes into rants about his calendar and year book? "Ha, hah!, you got that completely wrong. Petey played the role of Fonzi, I was more like Richie Cunningham. Ya see, ya see! you guys got it all wrong!"

This is A CLASSIC LIAR.
Evade the real topic.
Hope something insignificant is wrong and focus on that so you can go all outraged.
Get outraged about WHAT SHE HAS ACCUSED YOU OF.

And this of course is my OPINION because this is exactly the type of shit I have seen before. It has no standing in any kind of hearing.
To me, its common sense if you get accused of something this bad. You refute it and dont go off on idiotic tangents.

[ChumpDumper]

First I've seen it. I did see this in the original Union article.



The corporate lobbyist seems rather eager to speak for TR and put words in her mouth in a proactive attempt to do damage control for Creepy Joe.Too bad I quoted Reade herself.

Of course you never knew she said that.:lol

[Spurtacular]

ChumpDumper (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=153)

I also have seen nothing about her quitting. I've seen it stated that she complained to three staffers and then had her role diminished and then was ultimately fired by one one of them (Ted Kaufman)

[ChumpDumper]

ChumpDumper (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=153)

I also have seen nothing about her quitting. I've seen it stated that she complained to three staffers and then had her role diminished and then was ultimately fired by one one of them (Ted Kaufman)I resigned or I would say, I was forced to resign. I was told to look for another job.

--Alexandra Tara Reade
April, 17 2019

[Spurtacular]

You never saw this?

:lol so much for looking at this "quite a bit."

I did not like Joe Biden’s hand on me not for the reasons you think, it is because I am the alpha in the room too. Again, I like to be the one who chooses who enters my space and in what way.

We are sexual beings and we are all trying to figure out how to express this aspect of ourselves at work and home lives, it is a journey our society is on right now. But this is not a story about sexual misconduct; it is a story about abuse of power. It is a story about when a member of Congress allows staff to threaten or belittle or bully on their behalf unchecked to maintain power rather than modify the behavior.

--Alexandra Tara Reade
April, 17 2019

There you have it. She explicitly said Joe committed no sexual misconduct before she said he did.

The main story to her is Joe being all powerful and doing whatever the fuck he wants with impunity. She goes on to explain how this is so. Thus the story is not about the sexual misconduct as she is framing it. She never says that sexual misconduct did not occur.

https://www.theunion.com/opinion/columns/alexandra-tara-reade-a-girl-walks-into-the-senate/

[ChumpDumper]

The main story to her is Joe being all powerful and doing whatever the fuck he wants with impunity. She goes on to explain how this is so. Thus the story is not about the sexual misconduct as she is framing it. She never says that sexual misconduct did not occur.She said her story was not a story of sexual misconduct.

Sorry you didn't know about it.

You look pretty foolish right now.

lol derp

[ChumpDumper]

derp, if you believe Reade was trying to deceive people by withholding her story of sexual abuse because she had to save it for another year, that's fine.

[Spurtacular]

She said her story was not a story of sexual misconduct.

Sorry you didn't know about it.

You look pretty foolish right now.

lol derp

No, I knew that she didn't come out with the rape thing right away. Stop looking for your easy out in the second place.

[Spurtacular]

derp, if you believe Reade was trying to deceive people by withholding her story of sexual abuse because she had to save it for another year, that's fine.

I think there is considerable evidence that she has been protective of Joe Biden. It is not uncommon for victims to protect the perps.

[ChumpDumper]

No, I knew that she didn't come out with the rape thing right away. Stop looking for your easy out in the second place.You definitely didn't know she said all that stuff herself.

Man, you look so ignorant right now. That's gotta burn being schooled by me so blatantly.

[ChumpDumper]

I think there is considerable evidence that she has been protective of Joe Biden. It is not uncommon for victims to protect the perps.How common?

Show some stats supporting your claim.

[Chris]

if you wanted a joke-stealing shtick for elnono carlos would have been a better one. mencia was a mexican joke stealer too

I don't do "shtick".

I don't do "troll".

[Chris]

what happened to that guy? Guess he made his money and moved on...

You were stealing his shit.

[ChumpDumper]

You were stealing his shit.That's a shtick and it's not even yours.:lol

[Spurtacular]

How common?

Show some stats supporting your claim.

You're questioning what you know to be true cos you can't help yourself. :lol

[Spurtacular]

You definitely didn't know she said all that stuff herself.

Man, you look so ignorant right now. That's gotta burn being schooled by me so blatantly.

I just told you that I knew she didn't come out with rape right away. Why you doubling down on a shitty ploy?

[ChumpDumper]

You're questioning what you know to be true cos you can't help yourself. :lolNo, I don't know that's true. I'm asking you to back up your claim with numbers.

If you can't do that, just say you can't.

No one will be surprised.

[ChumpDumper]

I just told you that I knew she didn't come out with rape right away. Why you doubling down on a shitty ploy?Why did she change her story? Sounds like a shitty ploy on her part.

[Spurtacular]

Why did she change her story? Sounds like a shitty ploy on her part.

She never changed any details of her story. She did say upfront that she was not focused on the sexual assault. That was an error in judgment; but again, she has been quite protective Biden for years, even decades now.

[Spurtacular]

No, I don't know that's true.

Common knowledge. If you want to play the idiot card, I won't stop you.

[ChumpDumper]

She never changed any details of her story. She did say upfront that she was not focused on the sexual assault. That was an error in judgment; but again, she has been quite protective Biden for years, even decades now.She said her story was not a story of sexual misconduct, not a story of sexual conduct to be named later.

[ChumpDumper]

Common knowledge.Prove it. Show your non-anecdotal evidence.

[spurraider21]

I don't do "shtick".

I don't do "troll".
of course you do

[spurraider21]

Prove it. Show your non-anecdotal evidence.
"common knowledge" is his out. means he never has to explain anything.

its always common knowledge, redpill, etc

[ChumpDumper]

"common knowledge" is his out. means he never has to explain anything.

its always common knowledge, redpill, etcYep. Time for him to throw a tantrum.

[ElNono]

I don't do "shtick".

I don't do "troll".


You were stealing his shit.

Let us proceed...

[Spurtacular]

She said her story was not a story of sexual misconduct, not a story of sexual conduct to be named later.

That was a thematic declaration, not an outright denial of such an occurrence(s).

[Spurtacular]

Prove it. Show your non-anecdotal evidence.

They've invented names for occurrences when victims protect the perps. EG Stockholm Syndrome.

Why do you insist on L's in bulk? You're the only one who would argue this sh**.

[pgardn]

Let us proceed...

And they complain about sheeple while mating with them on ST.
Thread is the father of many a retarded ST trumpeter.

THREAD

[Spurtacular]

"common knowledge" is his out. means he never has to explain anything.

its always common knowledge, redpill, etc

Before you give too big a reach-around to Chump, you should note he's arguing that it's uncommon for victims to protect the perps.

[Spurtacular]

Thats bullshit.

She knew exactly who he was and she did tell close friends.

Add to that the way he reacted...
Go after her. Bring it back to her. Keep pounding SHE is recalling everything all wrong. He does not do this. He concentrates on the minutiae they got wrong.

Lets get upset at irrelevant bullshit " do you drink beer Senator?"
This is the biggest wtf witness that is begging to get off the real story: What SHE has accused him off. Does he try to bring it back, absolutely not. He gets himself all worked up with rants of how they got his nickname all wrong?

Thats an utter bullshit liar right there. She has accused me? of forcibly putting her on a bed and holding her down and he goes into rants about his calendar and year book? "Ha, hah!, you got that completely wrong. Petey played the role of Fonzi, I was more like Richie Cunningham. Ya see, ya see! you guys got it all wrong!"

This is A CLASSIC LIAR.
Evade the real topic.
Hope something insignificant is wrong and focus on that so you can go all outraged.
Get outraged about WHAT SHE HAS ACCUSED YOU OF.

And this of course is my OPINION because this is exactly the type of shit I have seen before. It has no standing in any kind of hearing.
To me, its common sense if you get accused of something this bad. You refute it and dont go off on idiotic tangents.

Breathe.

[ChumpDumper]

That was a thematic declaration:lmao

[ChumpDumper]

They've invented names for occurrences when victims protect the perps. EG Stockholm Syndrome.But this isn't a kidnapping.

Show your numbers.

[ChumpDumper]

Before you give too big a reach-around to Chump, you should note he's arguing that it's uncommon for victims to protect the perps.How common is it?

Give a number.

[Spurtacular]

:lmao

It was, clearly. She was (consistently) going out of her way to separate the sexual misconduct; this was no exception. I've called that a mistake though. She shouldn't have had sympathy for her predator. That's a trait for better or worse that many females exhibit in the aftermath.

[Spurtacular]

How common is it?

Give a number.

Common enough that you're desperate to even be attempting your contrarian schtick.

[Spurtacular]

But this isn't a kidnapping.

Show your numbers.

Which is a felonious crime, just like sexual assault. Your contrarian card for the sake of it has been way overplayed.

[ChumpDumper]

It was, clearly. She was (consistently) going out of her way to separate the sexual misconduct; this was no exception. I've called that a mistake though. She shouldn't have had sympathy for her predator. That's a trait for better or worse that many females exhibit in the aftermath.:lol she explicitly said it wasn't sexual. for some reason she forgot about that for another year.

[ChumpDumper]

Common enough that you're desperate to even be attempting your contrarian schtick.


Which is a felonious crime, just like sexual assault. Your contrarian card for the sake of it has been way overplayed.Just say you have no numbers at all and can't support your claim with anything more than anecdotes.

Can you be honest for once and do that?

[Spurtacular]

:lol she explicitly said it wasn't sexual.

Yes, she said her aim was not to focus on the sexual aspect of it but rather the abuse of power. I call that a tactical error on her part.

[ChumpDumper]

Yes, she said her aim was not to focus on the sexual aspect She said it wasn't sexual.

[Spurtacular]

for some reason she forgot about that for another year.

She stated that once Biden was the presumptive nominee that she could no longer hide it and not leave a better world for her daughter.

[Spurtacular]

She said it wasn't sexual.

A poor choice of ambiguous wording and lack of focus. But these victims often protect the perps like this.

Now cry that you don't know that even though you do. A couch potato like you has probably watched no less than a dozen 'Law And Order' episodes based on this.

[ChumpDumper]

She stated that once Biden was the presumptive nominee that she could no longer hide it and not leave a better world for her daughter.Was she in a coma the last 12 years?

Dude was Vice-President

[Spurtacular]

Just say you have no numbers

That would probably be something for which numbers are not really kept, nor could they accurately be kept, tbh.

But you want your convenient out.

[ChumpDumper]

A poor choice of ambiguous wording and lack of focus:lmao Now you're saying she didn't mean what she wrote herself.

[ChumpDumper]

That would probably be something for which numbers are not really kept, nor could they accurately be kept, tbh.Sure they could. Fairly easily with court records.

Let's just call it your unfounded theory with no statistical backing.

[Spurtacular]

Was she in a coma the last 12 years?

Dude was Vice-President

You think it's easy to just come out against someone at that level of power?

[Spurtacular]

:lmao Now you're saying she didn't mean what she wrote herself.

I'm saying that her ambiguous speech could lead someone such as you to reach such a conclusion. Of course, being the psychopath you are, you're taking it a step further now.

[Spurtacular]

Sure they could. Fairly easily with court records.

Let's just call it your unfounded theory with no statistical backing.

Could. No big compelling need to keep those stats, imo. If you're aware of such stats, then by all means, post them.

[Spurtacular]

How common is it?

Give a number.

For starters, 77 percent don't even report it to police. There's your jumping off point, douche.

https://www.rainn.org/statistics/criminal-justice-system

[Chris]

Let us proceed...

You were stealing his shit.

[ChumpDumper]

You think it's easy to just come out against someone at that level of power?Apparently it got easier for her after a few tries.:tu

[ChumpDumper]

I'm saying that her ambiguous speech could lead someone such as you to reach such a conclusion. Of course, being the psychopath you are, you're taking it a step further now.You're the one criticizing her and saying she didn't mean what she wrote.


Could. No big compelling need to keep those stats, imo. If you're aware of such stats, then by all means, post them.It's your claim. thanks for saying stats don't exist.:tu


For starters, 77 percent don't even report it to police. There's your jumping off point, douche.

https://www.rainn.org/statistics/criminal-justice-systemAccording to you, 100% of Trump's accusers lied.

That's your jumping off point.

[Spurtacular]

Apparently it got easier for her after a few tries.:tu

Biden is not in that position to screw her as easily. So yea, it did get easier.:tu

[ChumpDumper]

Biden is not in that position to screw her as easily.How was it easier when he was being vetted for VP?

[Spurtacular]

According to you, 100% of Trump's accusers lied.

That's your jumping off point.

Possibly. I haven't seen any strong accusations yet, IMO.

[ChumpDumper]

Possibly. I haven't seen any strong accusations yet, IMO.Which ones have you seen?

You can go by names of accusers since you study these things thoroughly.

[Spurtacular]

You're the one criticizing her and saying she didn't mean what she wrote.

You certainly shamelessly claim I'm saying that even as I say otherwise.:tu

Same ole from the resident psychopath.

[Spurtacular]

Which ones have you seen?

You can go by names of accusers since you study these things throroughly.

I'm not giving you an itemized list.

You're reaching for anything and everything. Try to choose your battles for once.

[ChumpDumper]

You certainly shamelessly claim I'm saying that even as I say otherwise.What are you saying then?

[ChumpDumper]

I'm not giving you an itemized list.

You're reaching for anything and everything. Try to choose your battles for once.derp folds

You don't know anything about those accusations but you think 100% of them are lying.:lol

[Spurtacular]

What are you saying then?

I already explained that she spoke with ambiguity. I had already made my point without even noting that.
I should've known you couldn't be a grown-up about it.

[ChumpDumper]

I already explained that she spoke with ambiguity.Oh, you criticized the lawyer because you know what she was thinking better than she.:lol

[Spurtacular]

derp folds

You don't know anything about those accusations but you think 100% of them are lying.:lol

You just watched me talking about some of these cases with your tranny butddy today.

Why do you so shameless lie. Gawd, you're a douche even for a psychopath.

[Spurtacular]

Oh, you criticized the lawyer because you know what she was thinking better than she.:lol

Gloria Alred?

:lol Chump clutching his pearls.

[ChumpDumper]

You just watched me talking about some of these cases with your tranny butddy today.Didn't read.

How many of those women you discussed were lying?

[ChumpDumper]

Gloria Alred?Tara Reade.

:rollin you didn't know she was a lawyer

[Spurtacular]

Tara Reade.

:rollin you didn't know she was a lawyer

Was this before or after Biden tried to turn her into a cocktail waitress?

:rollin

[ChumpDumper]

Was this before or after Biden tried to turn her into a cocktail waitress?

:rollin:lol deflection attempt #1

How did you not know she was a lawyer with all your research?

[Spurtacular]

:lol deflection attempt #1

How did you not know she was a lawyer with all your research?

No, seriously. Don't run.

Was this before or after Biden tried to turn her into a cocktail waitress?

[ChumpDumper]

No, seriously.You seriously didn't know she was a lawyer so now you're demanding to know when she became a lawyer.:lmao

And you're demanding I tell you.:rollin

Your research skills are lacking.

[Spurtacular]

You seriously didn't know she was a lawyer so now you're demanding to know when she became a lawyer.:lmao

And you're demanding I tell you.:rollin

Your research skills are lacking.

Chump folds. Afraid to answer the question.

[ChumpDumper]

Would you hire a lawyer and then tell her to perform as a cocktail waitress?:lmao you still haven't looked it up.

What is wrong with you?

[Spurtacular]

:lmao you still haven't looked it up.

What is wrong with you?

Yea, she's a lawyer. I'm not arguing with you on that.

Dump searching hard for huge tiny w's.

[ChumpDumper]

Yea, she's a lawyer. I'm not arguing with you on that.You're not arguing anything. You're demanding I tell you shit you can Google in five seconds.

What is wrong with you?

[Spurtacular]

You're not arguing anything. You're demanding I tell you shit you can Google in five seconds.

What is wrong with you?

You're lashing out.

Actually, I cannot find when she graduated from Seattle U. Can you?

[ChumpDumper]

You're lashing out.

Actually, I cannot find when she graduated from Seattle U. Can you?Yes.

:lmao you can't even Google right.

[Spurtacular]

Yes.

:lmao you can't even Google right.

Be an adult and act appropriately rather than looking for retard w's.

Do you know when she graduated from Seattle U? If so, list it.

[ChumpDumper]

Be an adult and act appropriately rather than looking for retard w's.Do you act like an adult on this board?


Do you know when she graduated from Seattle U?Yes.


If so, list it.N:lol

[ElNono]

You were stealing his shit.

Don't have time for retards, you think whatever you want, tbh

[Reck]

Derp you got the living shit beat out of you in this thread. :lol

[TimDunkem]

^What else is new?

[pgardn]

then and now

https://media.breitbart.com/media/2020/04/tara-reade-headshot-640x480.jpg


https://starswiki.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Tara-Reade.jpg

aging is sadistically cruel to some

Repost for Spurtacular to laugh at.

Now why dont we have a picture of your mom before and after giving birth to something like you?

[Reck]

1256378636095160321

[DMC]

It's hilarious how the left has set their own house on fire with all this #metoo and "believe all women" mantra when it suited their political agendas.

[pgardn]

It's hilarious how the left has set their own house on fire with all this #metoo and "believe all women" mantra when it suited their political agendas.

You are basically talking about boots.
The Chris and Spurter of the blue team you defend, and ask for help from.
It figures you would.

[Reck]

It's hilarious how the left has set their own house on fire with all this #metoo and "believe all women" mantra when it suited their political agendas.

Somebody has to do it. It certainly wont ever be the right.

We're in a unique position here. The only legal way to get rid of Trump is to put a touchy, perv up there.

Cant imagine any other candidate being able to beat Trump, imo. Biden has been established as the guy. Getting rid of the one guy who by according to every poll beats the shit out of Trump is a huge risk right now.

It'll depressed the vote even more.

[DMC]

You are basically talking about boots.
The Chris and Spurter of the blue team you defend, and ask for help from.
It figures you would.

The right is the red team.

Everything else you said is just as retarded.

[Reck]

WASHINGTON (AP) — Tara Reade, the former Senate staffer (https://apnews.com/d922da60baa91121f4529fe51a0fd55a) who alleges Joe Biden sexually assaulted her 27 years ago, says she filed a limited report with a congressional personnel office that did not explicitly accuse him of sexual assault or harassment.


“I remember talking about him wanting me to serve drinks because he liked my legs and thought I was pretty and it made me uncomfortable,” Reade said in an interview Friday with The Associated Press. “I know that I was too scared to write about the sexual assault.”



Story changed , again.

https://apnews.com/aec7beb03e9e0e0e6e3c58111293e0ea

[pgardn]

The right is the red team.

Everything else you said is just as retarded.

You again stuck your mouth into the middle of a thread you have not kept up with.
dickwad...

[DMC]

You again stuck your mouth into the middle of a thread you have not kept up with.
dickwad...

You quoted me you autistic fuck.

[ChumpDumper]

Story changed , again.

https://apnews.com/aec7beb03e9e0e0e6e3c58111293e0ea Whoops. She just destroyed TSA's strategy to demand a months long search for one name in the hundreds of thousands of pages of Biden's archives.

[boutons_deux]

Whoops. She just destroyed TSA's strategy to demand a months long search for one name in the hundreds of thousands of pages of Biden's archives.

if she could not arrive to report "sexual harassment", then it doesn't sound like rape.

Biden has admitted his mistakes about touching women (Trash has admitted nothing with much more serious claims on video by his victimes, including forced penetration) that are recorded on various pics, vids.

Biden's creepiness is worse than Trash's violations? false equivalence.

[Nathan89]

https://twitter.com/JoeBiden/status/1256636638144446466?s=20
Turning women into victims is a terrible message to send young girls across the country.

[ChumpDumper]

https://twitter.com/JoeBiden/status/1256636638144446466?s=20
Turning women into victims is a terrible message to send young girls across the country.Eh, the women actually win. They should get some more money.

[pgardn]

You quoted me you autistic fuck.

Ill lay it out for you again.

Just like with Nature v. Nurture.
With your tiny brain it will take pictures because that’s where the whole thing arises.

[Reck]

"This is false," Reade had tweeted in response to a tweet from AP Politics, which read: "Tara Reade says a Senate report she filed against Joe Biden didn’t refer to sexual harassment or assault."

Reade later told Fox News that the "story itself is correct" but that the headline is "wrong."


Later that day the AP says OK we'll change it.


On Saturday evening, The AP changed its headline to "Reade: ‘I didn’t use sexual harassment’ in Biden complaint."

Then


However, Reade told Fox News that it's "still incorrect" and "misleading."

"They're standing by the fact... that I said I don't think I used the term 'sexual harassment.' We didn't use it as much back in 1993, so I don't know but that's not to say that there isn't a box that I didn't check.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/tara-reade-associated-press-biden-complaint
--

Well which is it lady? You cant say something is false then say it's actually correct. Then again point out how they're wrong and then go on to say you're not sure what you even said because we didn't call it "sexual harrassment" back in the day.

You accused the guy of rape and now you dont know? :lol Batshit crazy lady.

[Spurtacular]

Eh, the women actually win. They should get some more money.

Why do you think they aren't?

[Chris]

Don't have time for retards, you think whatever you want, tbh

You were stealing his shit.

[Reck]

Alcohol is the Devil's drink.


Alcohol is the Devil's drink.


You were stealing his shit.


You were stealing his shit.


You were stealing his shit.


You were stealing his shit.


A literal fucking retard at work.

:lol bot

[ChumpDumper]

Why do you think they aren't?Men's soccer competitions make more money overall. Not sure completely equal pay will ever be possible but the disparity between the terrible US men's team and the virtually unbeatable women's team is laughable.

[Spurtacular]

Men's soccer competitions make more money overall. Not sure completely equal pay will ever be possible but the disparity between the terrible US men's team and the virtually unbeatable women's team is laughable.

Are you talking about a pay gap between players on the national teams or on their club teams?

[ChumpDumper]

Are you talking about a pay gap between players on the national teams or on their club teams?Jesus Christ derp did you not read Nathan's tweet either?

[Reck]

Are you talking about a pay gap between players on the national teams or on their club teams?

The one that actually wins.

[Spurtacular]

Jesus Christ derp did you not read Nathan's tweet either?

No. The tweets haven't been showing up on ST for me the last two days.

So again I ask, are you talking about a pay gap between players on the national teams or on their club teams?

[ChumpDumper]

No.OK.

[Spurtacular]

OK.

:lol So, you're not going to say?
:lol Damn, you just want every nothing w you can gobble up.