Ahmaud Arbery

[Blake]

Interesting. The second neighbor joined in on the pursuit. Must be full-on KKK, amirite?

DON'T CALL IT A CHASE THO

[Spurtacular]

If that video is correct, I'm relatively okay with calling it a chase. Though the one guy holding the handgun was on the phone with police and attempting to involve them ASAP. Not exactly the stuff murder is made of. Chumpettes just love a good white lynching.

[Spurtacular]

DON'T CALL IT A CHASE THO

YOU ARE SO DESPERATE TO BE ON CHUMP'S LEVEL. :lol

[spurraider21]

First of all, they absolutely chased him. And second, I'm laughing that you would even try to draw a distinction without a difference that's compounded with an incorrect premise.

The chase (i.e. "pursuit"), begins at 3:21 in the video timeline of events below.

-nKf0TW-L1M
disgusting

[Spurtacular]

disgusting

Why would they call the police if they were trying to get away with murder?
That's pretty stupid on its face.

[Millennial_Messiah]

I'm guessing the conservatives/GOP are hoping for a guilty and long term sentence here (2nd degree murder and ~25-30 years for the dad; perhaps manslaughter for the son and ~5 years) so the left will stop crying double standards.

[Spurtacular]

I'm guessing the conservatives/GOP are hoping for a guilty and long term sentence here (2nd degree murder and ~25-30 years for the dad; perhaps manslaughter for the son and ~5 years) so the left will stop crying double standards.

This is why Dems love these cases. These shameless narratives fire their base. A not guilty verdict is really good for business.

[DeadlyDynasty]

If you don’t know this person then please stop pretending to care.

[DMX7]

Chumpettes just love a good white lynching.

You are so stupid. Did you know that in a lynching it’s the person who gets lynched that dies and the person who does the lynching that survives? Not the other way around.


Why would they call the police if they were trying to get away with murder?
That's pretty stupid on its face.

I doubt they originally intended to kill Arbery when the call was made, but they thought they had the right to chase him down the street with a gun even though they are not police and they had no evidence that he had done anything seriously wrong. That was problem number 1. And I wonder why they felt that way. Hmmm....

Problem number 2 of course is the fatal consequence of what can happen when you introduce the above risks, which is why they had no business going after Arbery to begin with.

[Spurtacular]

You are so stupid. Did you know that in a lynching it’s the person who gets lynched that dies and the person who does the lynching that survives? Not the other way around.

Do you know what a metaphor is?

[DMX7]

Do you know what a metaphor is?

Yeah, and I just destroyed your stupid one.

[Spurtacular]

I doubt they originally intended to kill Arbery when the call was made

And you need intent for murder, bruh.

:lol Speaking of destroyed.

[ChumpDumper]

And you need intent for murder, bruh.

:lol Speaking of destroyed.They certainly intended to kill him when they shot.

[Spurtacular]

They certainly intended to kill him when they shot.

He certainly intended to repel a deadly attack.

[ChumpDumper]

He certainly intended to repel a deadly attack.By killing him with the guns as intended when they shot him.

lol "deadly"

[Spurtacular]

By killing him with the guns as intended when they shot him.

lol "deadly"

Is an enraged guy charging you and taking your gun a deadly threat?

Yes or no.

[Blake]

If that video is correct, I'm relatively okay with calling it a chase.

Oh hey, it only took you several days! Good boy!

[Spurtacular]

Oh hey, it only took you several days! Good boy!

:lol Cuck trying to talk down to me after I just got an admission from his fellow ankle biter that this is not murder.

[Blake]

:lol Cuck trying to talk down to me after I just got an admission from his fellow ankle biter that this is not murder.

Aww it looks like it's gonna take a few more days of multiple people dumbing this whole thing way down before derp starts to understand why they were charged with murder.

You should thank anyone that takes the time to teach this elementary stuff to you. I don't have the patience to do a back and forth with a piece of shit retard like you. :tu

[DMX7]

Is an enraged guy charging you and taking your gun a deadly threat?

Yes or no.

Didn’t look like he took the gun to me. Looks like he got shot and was left to bleed out.

[Spurtacular]

I doubt they originally intended to kill Arbery when the call was made


And you need intent for murder, bruh.


:lol Cuck trying to talk down to me after I just got an admission from his fellow ankle biter that this is not murder.


:cry

:lol

[DMX7]

:lol Cuck trying to talk down to me after I just got an admission from his fellow ankle biter that this is not murder.

Didn’t intend to kill when the call was made. Did intend to kill when he got up close and shot him.

[Spurtacular]

Didn’t intend to kill when the call was made. Did intend to kill when he got up close and shot him.

The use of deadly force in self defense is not murder.

Now that you've learned what murder means, you still want to be a part of the chumpette lynch mob?

[ChumpDumper]

Is an enraged guy charging you and taking your gun a deadly threat?

Yes or no.How do you know he was enraged?

[DMX7]

The use of deadly force in self defense is not murder.

Now that you've learned what murder means, you still want to be a part of the chumpette lynch mob?

We’ve already established who had the gun, who chased who, and who was shot and left to bleed out.

[Spurtacular]

How do you know he was enraged?

Is a guy charging you and taking your gun a deadly threat?

Yes or no.

[DMX7]

The only person acting in self defense appears to have been Arbery.

[Spurtacular]

We’ve already established who had the gun, who chased who, and who was shot and left to bleed out.

You're trying to talk your way around the crux of the matter.

Now that you've learned that this is not murder, do you still want to be a part of the chumpette lynch mob?

[Spurtacular]

The only person acting in self defense appears to have been Arbery.

So, you would've let him take your gun?

[DMX7]

So, you would've let him take your gun?

Well I wouldn’t have been pursuing him with a gun to begin with. But if I had, I wouldn’t have shot him. Could have done lots of things... a warning shot for example.

[ChumpDumper]

Is a guy charging you and taking your gun a deadly threat?

Yes or no.Not necessarily-- e.g., if you were charging me I'd be more likely to die of laughter than anything you could do to me physically.

[FrostKing]

https://i.ibb.co/w70RVXw/43267-1.jpg

The bball shorts under trackpants :lol

[KobesAchilles]

https://i.ibb.co/w70RVXw/43267-1.jpg

The bball shorts under trackpants :lol
I take it you never made the basketball team. All of us wore sweats with b-ball shorts underneath them. It’s the hoopers style bro. Hell I still rock out my sweats with b-ball shorts underneath with a pair of J’s

[Spurtacular]

Well I wouldn’t have been pursuing him with a gun to begin with. But if I had, I wouldn’t have shot him. Could have done lots of things... a warning shot for example.

So, you would've died because you think the idiot would've adhered to a warning shot. :lmao

[Spurtacular]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1v7o_6uI9R0

:lol Comments turned off.
:lol Aggressively going at people having guns there too.

[Spurtacular]

Not necessarily-- e.g., if you were charging me I'd be more likely to die of laughter than anything you could do to me physically.

David Dook folds.

[Texas_Ranger]

if it was me, i wouldn't hunt the guy with a gun, but am i sad that a criminal is dead. Not really. Also, you have to be pretty retarded to run at a guy with a gun.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1262561458161889282?s=19

[Blake]

if it was me, i wouldn't hunt the guy with a gun, but am i sad that a criminal is dead. Not really. Also, you have to be pretty retarded to run at a guy with a gun.

What crime did the dead guy commit that deserved death?

[Blake]

https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1262561458161889282?s=19

You guys are never gonna stop trying to justify this murder are you

[Spurtacular]

You guys are never gonna stop trying to justify this murder are you

You think Ahmaud Arbery was a fine upstanding guy?

[Texas_Ranger]

What crime did the dead guy commit that deserved death?

i dont think he deserved to die.

[Will Hunting]

Another example of white men harrassing Ahmaud Arbery for no reason besides being black :tu thanks for posting!
No kidding, being a young black man living in the south really fucking sucks tbh.

[Will Hunting]

Then again Southern blacks kinda bring it on themselves when they think Jim Crow Joe Biden is going to be their savior.

[FrostKing]

Randomly parked in the middle of a field, known for drug trafficking

Dressed weird. Acting aggressive. 9/10 he's up to no good.

[DMX7]

So, you would've died because you think the idiot would've adhered to a warning shot. :lmao

I wouldn’t have died. You’re so stupid. :lol Nice to know that Spurtacular wouldn’t even bother with a warning shot and just goes straight for the kill. Reveals a lot about your blood lust. :lol

[DMX7]

You didn’t answer the question.

He answered the question that’s relevant. Even if he wasn’t a stand up guy ( which is just slander anyway) doesn’t give random people the right to run him down and kill him.

[benefactor]

lol the derp rodeo in this thread...why in the fuck are any of you engaging him? It's pretty obvious his responses are not about taking any legit stance. He's just begging for attention from other men per par

[Trill Clinton]

lol the derp rodeo in this thread...why in the fuck are any of you engaging him? It's pretty obvious his responses are not about taking any legit stance. He's just begging for attention from other men per par

Basically.

[spurraider21]

Oh look a video from years ago that also has nothing to do with the incident whatsoever

[Chucho]

lol the derp rodeo in this thread...why in the fuck are any of you engaging him? It's pretty obvious his responses are not about taking any legit stance. He's just begging for attention from other men per par

Since he can't have sex with Chump, living his life is as close as derp can get.

[Spurtacular]

I wouldn’t have died. You’re so stupid. :lol Nice to know that Spurtacular wouldn’t even bother with a warning shot and just goes straight for the kill. Reveals a lot about your blood lust. :lol

Holding the gun is the warning, moron. Re-watch the video. If he had fired a warning shot after Arbery rounded the truck, it would've been too late.

[MultiTroll]

Has cell phone camera recorder said why he was recording it yet?
https://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/200511232342-william-roddie-bryan-ahmaud-arbery-shooting-witness-kevin-gough-bts-cpt-vpx-00004512-exlarge-169.jpg
Get hair cut at same place as Raiders owner.

[Spurtacular]

Randomly parked in the middle of a field, known for drug trafficking

Dressed weird. Acting aggressive. 9/10 he's up to no good.

Generous. 10/10 he's up to no good.

[Spurtacular]

:cry

:lol

[Blake]

i dont think he deserved to die.

You're just not sad about it.

Funny how you're not saying a word about the white retards running him down that actually might get the chair for their [alleged] crimes.

[FrostKing]

You're just not sad about it.

Funny how you're not saying a word about the white retards running him down that actually might get the chair for their [alleged] crimes.
Haha! The chair. They will plead down and get 1-2 years. Serve half with good behavior.

[Blake]

Haha! The chair. They will plead down and get 1-2 years. Serve half with good behavior.

I'm saying it's possible, even if not probable. I'm a little surprised they're going murder charges over manslaughter here.

But that wasn't really the point.

[Spurtacular]

white... might get the chair for their [alleged] crimes.

A cuckold can dream, amirite?

[Texas_Ranger]

You're just not sad about it.

Funny how you're not saying a word about the white retards running him down that actually might get the chair for their [alleged] crimes.

i did say i wouldnt have gone after the guy with a gun. The whole situation and everyone in the situation looks like a retard. And if they get jail time i am fine with it.

[Blake]

i did say i wouldnt have gone after the guy with a gun. The whole situation and everyone in the situation looks like a retard. And if they get jail time i am fine with it.

It's a shame you didn't say that at the beginning. Now we all know you're just a racist piece of shit. :tu

[Texas_Ranger]

It's a shame you didn't say that at the beginning. Now we all know you're just a racist piece of shit. :tu

sure thing. i am also homophobic, sexist, misogynistic and whatever else all the cool kids are this days... oh yea, also a nazi, can't forget about that one.

[spurraider21]

:cry but he was up to no good :cry

completely irrelevant side discussion. He was not a threat to the bubbas. They chased him down and confronted him while brandishing a shotgun.

They didn’t witness him committing any crime on that day so his “being up to no good” did not affect their state of mind in deciding to pursue him

even if we learn tomorrow that minutes before they spotted him on the street he had just raped somebody, it wouldn’t go into the calculus of murder charges because it all goes to the state or mind of the bubbas. If they had no knowledge of it, it doesn’t matter.

All we know is they claimed to recognize him from security footage of an earlier robbery and that was the extent of their knowledge/state of mind period

[Blake]

sure thing. i am also homophobic, sexist, misogynistic and whatever else all the cool kids are this days... oh yea, also a nazi, can't forget about that one.

No evidence of any of that. Just the racist part.

[Blake]

:cry but he was up to no good :cry

completely irrelevant side discussion. He was not a threat to the bubbas. They chased him down and confronted him while brandishing a shotgun.

They didn’t witness him committing any crime on that day so his “being up to no good” did not affect their state of mind in deciding to pursue him

even if we learn tomorrow that minutes before they spotted him on the street he had just raped somebody, it wouldn’t go into the calculus of murder charges because it all goes to the state or mind of the bubbas. If they had no knowledge of it, it doesn’t matter.

All we know is they claimed to recognize him from security footage of an earlier robbery and that was the extent of their knowledge/state of mind period

Imagine the reverse outrage by bubbaville if a white kid had been looking around a vacant house and then was chased down by two black guys with guns and killed.

[koriwhat]

10 gangbangers in South Chicago and it’d be a slaughter.

every damn weekend it's a slaughter out there between their own. no need to put fat incels anywhere in chicago to keep them numbers from going up up up!

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1263229132542009347?s=19

[FrostKing]

:lol

Queue the studio photo in Tuxedo

[FrostKing]

https://i.ibb.co/pPt36ZY/IMG-20200520-WA0008.jpg

[MultiTroll]

:cry but he was up to no good :cry

completely irrelevant side discussion. He was not a threat to the bubbas. They chased him down and confronted him while brandishing a shotgun.
Isn't it going to be impossible to find an *impartial* jury in Bubbaville?
For that matter now that the entire US has seen the footage?

[spurraider21]

Isn't it going to be impossible to find an *impartial* jury in Bubbaville?
For that matter now that the entire US has seen the footage?
the jurors are certainly going to be shown the footage during trial anyway

[Will Hunting]

Isn't it going to be impossible to find an *impartial* jury in Bubbaville?
For that matter now that the entire US has seen the footage?
I think the bigger concern is bias the prosecutor/judge level for not wanting to go after “one of their own”

[Spurtacular]

I think the bigger concern is bias the prosecutor/judge level for not wanting to go after “one of their own”

:lol Lay off the movies, dude.

[Spurtacular]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=105&v=mAfA7OJIH0E&feature=emb_ logo

Getting so a nigga can't get a drink of water.

[DMC]

The trial will hinge on the moments just prior to the shooting, was the defendant within his legal right to have a firearm, was the victim trying to defend himself or was he attacking? Was the gun accidentally discharged? Was the defendant in fear of his life once the struggle over the firearm ensued?

This won't be as cut and dry as it appears at first glance.

[Spurtacular]

The trial will hinge on the moments just prior to the shooting, was the defendant within his legal right to have a firearm, was the victim trying to defend himself or was he attacking? Was the gun accidentally discharged? Was the defendant in fear of his life once the struggle over the firearm ensued?

This won't be as cut and dry as it appears at first glance.

I think it'll hinge on proving the narrative that he was being "hunted". Because if not, then this is a pretty open and shut case ending in a not guilty verdict.

[DMC]

I think it'll hinge on proving the narrative that he was being "hunted". Because if not, then this is a pretty open and shut case ending in a not guilty verdict.

That's pretty easy to establish given the two men in trucks pursuing him with long guns.

[Spurtacular]

That's pretty easy to establish given the two men in trucks pursuing him with long guns.

They said they were performing a citizen's arrest; conjunctivey, they were calling 911.

[DMC]

They said they were performing a citizen's arrest; conjunctivey, they were calling 911.

They had to get into their vehicles to chase this guy down. They were acting as a posse. There's no reason for civilians to arm themselves, mount up and go after bad guys. That's what the cops are for. If they get life in prison they deserve it for being stupid fucks.

[Chucho]

They had to get into their vehicles to chase this guy down. They were acting as a posse. There's no reason for civilians to arm themselves, mount up and go after bad guys. That's what the cops are for. If they get life in prison they deserve it for being stupid fucks.


LOL, he's conflicted how to respond. You're one of the few people who allies with him, so he's really taking inventory how to proceed.

2:1 He calls you a cuck

5:1 He calls you fat hands

1:2 He'll actually reply with a legit response to keep the friendship strong.

[spurraider21]

https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1263229132542009347?s=19
how is this relevant to what happened in february 2020?

[Blake]

LOL, he's conflicted how to respond. You're one of the few people who allies with him, so he's really taking inventory how to proceed.

2:1 He calls you a cuck

5:1 He calls you fat hands

1:2 He'll actually reply with a legit response to keep the friendship strong.

1:5 he turns this on chucho somehow

[Chucho]

What’s the payout for “he hides from all this until Chump comments, then he latches onto that teat and goes 6 pages debating nothing”? I’m putting my lifesavings on that.


" :lol Slob trying desperately for a tiny W "


But, honestly, that's about as certain as his fagboi lover kori coming in here to scream and get him some derp spunk between his missing teeth.

[spurraider21]

BREAKING: In 2006 Ahmaud Arbery got detention for talking too much in class.

[Trill Clinton]

https://twitter.com/DC_Draino/status/1258965564740993024?s=19


Wow he took an L here

[Trill Clinton]

https://twitter.com/RealCandaceO/status/1259202646864510977?s=19

She took an L here

[spurraider21]

https://i.gyazo.com/0276e1e65421a5af7267635bbf19570c.png

"timberland boots"

[Chucho]

So...at worst, dude was a petty thief.

The justice system would give him some misdemeanor probation and some restitution.

White Justice saw to it to take another colored off the white man's planet earth.


What sucks is that both of these pieces of shit will be protected by shitty white prison gangs and heralded as saviors and heroes in prison. Their buttholes and bloated carcasses won't get the prison justice they deserve.

[spurraider21]

So...at worst, dude was a petty thief.

The justice system would give him some misdemeanor probation and some restitution.

White Justice saw to it to take another colored off the white man's planet earth.


What sucks is that both of these pieces of shit will be protected by shitty white prison gangs and heralded as saviors and heroes in prison. Their buttholes and bloated carcasses won't get the prison justice they deserve.
https://www.wrdw.com/content/news/Text-messages-more-video-provide-greater-context-to-Ahmaud-Arbery-case-570570441.html


Videos in the Ahmaud Arbery case are not the only things providing more context.Text messages, paired with a connection by suspects Gregory and Travis McMichael to local law enforcement officials, are, too.

From Oct. 25, 2019, to Feb. 23, 2020, home security footage captures at least eight different instances of people visiting a home under construction that’s at the center of Arbery’s death. (https://www.wrdw.com/content/news/New-this-morning-Owner-of-construction-site-speaks-out-about-Arbery-case-570463931.html)

”Not so much as a screwdriver or a hammer has ever gone missing and nothing has ever been damaged,” said attorney Elizabeth Graddy, who represents the property owner Larry English.

A couple, children on two occasions, and a black male several times -- Ahmaud’s family only confirmed the Feb. 23 video was him.

The activity at the property led the owner, Larry English, to reach out to an officer. But his lawyer notes it was never to report it as a crime but to make sure people were safe.

They believe in a December video, the person may have walked through the site to drink water from an old faucet, which people used when the lot was previously vacant.

“And then he kind of eased into a jog and that’s exactly how it looked. That he’s running back into the neighborhood not like he’s fleeing,” Graddy said.

By December, text messages show an officer told the property owner he can reach out to Gregory McMichael because of his history as a former officer and DA investigator.

That same law enforcement history shows for three years, he failed to complete required training, citing health issues.

Regardless, Graddy says, her client never enlisted the help of the former officer.

“If there had been a crime, there would still have been no justification for this young man to lose his life. To be chased down and terrified in the last minutes of his life,” Graddy said.
“There is no crime he could’ve committed that would have warranted that.”

Meanwhile, the McMichaels’ lawyers maintain the pursuit and shooting were justified.

Although English and his lawyer Graddy do not know for certain why each person came onto the property, they do know, however, no crime appears to have ever happened.

The Georgia Bureau of Investigation did confirm it is investigating additional video in the case. The property owner says all the information has been turned over to authorities.

Lawyers for the McMichaels claim there's been a rush to judgment and evidence released in court will allow for the truth to come out.

[Chris]

Wow he took an L here


She took an L here

Save your ebonics for someone else hoodrat.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1263592561328812034?s=19

[FrostKing]

Guy filming arrested with murder charges?

They are getting the black communities hopes up. Massive backlash against court system imminent.

[Spurtacular]

They had to get into their vehicles to chase this guy down. They were acting as a posse. There's no reason for civilians to arm themselves, mount up and go after bad guys. That's what the cops are for. If they get life in prison they deserve it for being stupid fucks.

Their methods may not have been recommended, but pursuing a suspected criminal is not illegal.

[DMC]

Their methods may not have been recommended, but pursuing a suspected criminal is not illegal.

Pursuing anyone isn't illegal. Pursuing them with long guns and killing them, that's a bit on the illegal side.

[Spurtacular]

Pursuing anyone isn't illegal. Pursuing them with long guns and killing them, that's a bit on the illegal side.

Pursuing them is not illegal: Check
Acting in self defense after the pursued attacks is illegal: No Check

[Spurtacular]

LOL, he's conflicted how to respond. You're one of the few people who allies with him, so he's really taking inventory how to proceed.

2:1 He calls you a cuck

5:1 He calls you fat hands

1:2 He'll actually reply with a legit response to keep the friendship strong.


1:5 he turns this on chucho somehow

You guys set a play date yet?

[Chucho]

You guys set a play date yet?

derp projecting his homosexual fantasies here.

[Blake]

They said they were performing a citizen's arrest; conjunctivey, they were calling 911.

Derptionary word

[Spurtacular]

Derptionary word

A misspelling, dip shit.

[Spurtacular]

derp projecting his homosexual fantasies here.

You're the one that wants to zoom cyber with blake.

[Mitch]

Doubt a jury convicts of anything more than manslaughter, tbh. Not sure why this story is so popular :lol

[Spurtacular]

Doubt a jury convicts of anything more than manslaughter, tbh. Not sure why this story is so popular :lol

If not for the video of the dumb ass charging guys holding guns, this would be the next Trayvon Martin.

[Blake]

A misspelling, dip shit.

You still used it awkwardly, board dumbfuck.

[Blake]

If not for the video of the dumb ass charging guys holding guns, this would be the next Trayvon Martin.

You're so retarded. :lol

[Trainwreck2100]

If not for the video of the dumb ass charging guys holding guns, this would be the next Trayvon Martin.

without the video this shit isn't a story, and the bubbas are out.

[Spurtacular]

You still used it awkwardly, board dumbfuck.


You're so retarded. :lol

SMH

[Spurtacular]

without the video this shit isn't a story, and the bubbas are out.

Perhaps that is true. But the video ultimately quells many Trayvon narratives.

The idea that GZ was pounding TM and then decided to execute him was laughable.
He was the one who ended up having the gashes on his head.
Those shameless kinds of narratives still stick with people.
Nobody trusts the corporate media any more.

[Blake]

Doubt a jury convicts of anything more than manslaughter, tbh. Not sure why this story is so popular :lol

Because of how long it took to arrest the bubbas

[Spurtacular]

Because of how long it took to arrest the bubbas

:lol How do you figure that has any bearing at all?

[Blake]

:lol How do you figure that has any bearing at all?

You're really stupid. You'll need to ask someone else that is willing to take the time to really dumb it down for you.

[Spurtacular]

You're really stupid. You'll need to ask someone else that is willing to take the time to really dumb it down for you.

Don't lash out. Explain your assertion.

[Spurtacular]

And the lynching continues...

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/man-who-filmed-ahmaud-arberys-death-arrested-on-murder-charges-georgia-authorities-say/ar-BB14r3su?ocid=spartandhp

[FrostKing]

We'll see

Currently: "the Teams" sure seem on extreme ends on the topic of punishment

America :lol. Never agree on anything

[spurraider21]

Perhaps that is true. But the video ultimately quells many Trayvon narratives.
yeah it quells the narrative that the Arbery instigated the conflict


The idea that GZ was pounding TM and then decided to execute him was laughable.
He was the one who ended up having the gashes on his head.
who was "winning" the fight is irrelevant. you cant punch somebody, have them start beating you up, and then shoot them in "self defense" if you're the one who caused the conflict to escalate. the question of whether or not trayvon was beating the shit out of zimmerman is irrelevant. it's who the aggressor was. there was insufficient evidence for a conviction there. not the case here.

[spurraider21]

:lmao the person who leaked the video is actually the defense attorney for the guy who shot the video, who has now been arrested as well

bubbas were going to walk until this guy released the video.... fucked over his own client

[Spurtacular]

yeah it quells the narrative that the Arbery instigated the conflict

What does that even mean?

[spurraider21]

What does that even mean?
video proves that bubbas were the aggressors

[Spurtacular]

who was "winning" the fight is irrelevant. you cant punch somebody, have them start beating you up, and then shoot them in "self defense" if you're the one who caused the conflict to escalate. the question of whether or not trayvon was beating the shit out of zimmerman is irrelevant. it's who the aggressor was. there was insufficient evidence for a conviction there. not the case here.

Spurious stuff, Philo.

Don't think you'll find a respectable lawyer who says it is illegal to use deadly force against an attacker using fatal force.

[Spurtacular]

video proves that bubbas were the aggressors

Who charged who?

You need to sop up your tears already and come to terms on basic points.

[Trill Clinton]

Who charged who?

You need to sop up your tears already and come to terms on basic points.

They aggressively chased him with weapons

[Millennial_Messiah]

although, it's ridiculous to charge or convict someone who actually wasn't physically involved in the murder... the cameraman is basically the equivalent of NFL Hall of Famer Ray Rice... I mean Ray Lewis.

[spurraider21]

Spurious stuff, Philo.

Don't think you'll find a respectable lawyer who says it is illegal to use deadly force against an attacker using fatal force.
im sure you can find a lawyer who will zealously advocate for his clients

it wont hold up in court if the defendants are the ones who caused the conflict.

depending on the jurisdiction, there can be an argument of escalation... ie i punch somebody in the face, they pull out a knife, and then i shoot them. you could argue that the knife turned a non-lethal conflict into a lethal one, and then you have a self defense argument. that rule isnt universal, though.

in this case, bubbas are the ones who introduced the guns and initiated the conflict, so they wouldnt even have that going for them

[spurraider21]

Who charged who?

You need to sop up your tears already and come to terms on basic points.
the guy was running and bubba got out of his truck and confronted him with a shotgun, after several minutes of chasing him around with a truck and trying to cut him off at various points

[SpursforSix]

:lmao the person who leaked the video is actually the defense attorney for the guy who shot the video, who has now been arrested as well

bubbas were going to walk until this guy released the video.... fucked over his own client

wtf

[spurraider21]

wtf
:lol he thought the video would help

basically he thought the whole world was just a bunch of derps

[SpursforSix]

:lmao the person who leaked the video is actually the defense attorney for the guy who shot the video, who has now been arrested as well

bubbas were going to walk until this guy released the video.... fucked over his own client

wtf

[MultiTroll]

Defense Atty Alan Tucker says "the video has been in possession of police since day one." :wow

[MultiTroll]

https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/PX2v2FiclOr34PeDewwOPDU0Vqc=/0x0:2373x3560/1200x800/filters:focal(879x573:1257x951)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/59841605/usa_today_10538624.0.jpg
https://www.gannett-cdn.com/presto/2020/05/12/USAT/6b4f58f6-2136-40ca-b7c9-1b415285a804-VPC_ARBERY_WITNESS_INTERVIEW_DESK_THUMB.00_00_01_0 4.Still001.jpg?width=660&height=371&fit=crop&format=pjpg&auto=webp

[MultiTroll]

:lol he thought the video would help

basically he thought the whole world was just a bunch of derps
Nah the cops had the video since day 1 he claims.

Some falling out between Atty Alan Tucker and William Bryan? Like he didn't pay his bill. Thus atty releases video.

[spurraider21]

Nah the cops had the video since day 1 he claims.

Some falling out between Atty Alan Tucker and William Bryan? Like he didn't pay his bill. Thus atty releases video.
its true that the cops had the video since day 1. those cops never pressed charges

then the lawyer leaked the video to the public, which prompted an investigation by the Georgia Bureau of Investigation (independent from the Glynn County Police Department who sat on the case), leading to the charges/arrests

[MultiTroll]

its true that the cops had the video since day 1. those cops never pressed charges

then the lawyer leaked the video to the public, which prompted an investigation by the Georgia Bureau of Investigation (independent from the Glynn County Police Department who sat on the case), leading to the charges/arrests
Right. So he had his client right where he wants him, safely in the hands of the local Dept of Bubba Justice.
Getting off scott free.
So why leak the video two months later? Which causes your Bubba client to get charged.

[Blake]

What does that even mean?

Jeez you're stupid.

[spurraider21]

Right. So he had his client right where he wants him, safely in the hands of the local Dept of Bubba Justice.
Getting off scott free.
So why leak the video two months later? Which causes your Bubba client to get charged.
you can read articles discussing just this and his comments for why he released the video

[MultiTroll]

you can read articles discussing just this and his comments for why he released the video
Read some of them an his comments just adds to the confusion as to he the attys motive:

"If he had just frozen, he wouldn’t have gotten shot."



psssh. Calls for speculation and assumes fact not in evidence.

Atty does say that he himself did not see the video until April 30th. Huh?

[MultiTroll]

https://wfxg.images.worldnow.com/images/19401402_G.jpeg?auto=webp&disable=upscale&height=560&fit=bounds&lastEditedDate=1588972962000

Lawyer Alan David Tucker

[DMC]

I watched that video of the victim being detained and questions (and tazed) in a park and it make me mad. Mostly because even after the guy leaves on foot, the dickhead cop wants to tow the guys vehicle, get inside and find basically anything to arrest him for. That's a real dick move and should get him kicked off the force. His own boss had to tell him to piss off.

[DMC]

https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/PX2v2FiclOr34PeDewwOPDU0Vqc=/0x0:2373x3560/1200x800/filters:focal(879x573:1257x951)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/59841605/usa_today_10538624.0.jpg
https://www.gannett-cdn.com/presto/2020/05/12/USAT/6b4f58f6-2136-40ca-b7c9-1b415285a804-VPC_ARBERY_WITNESS_INTERVIEW_DESK_THUMB.00_00_01_0 4.Still001.jpg?width=660&height=371&fit=crop&format=pjpg&auto=webp

Arrest the barber

[Spurtacular]

They aggressively chased him with weapons

Who charged who?

[Spurtacular]

im sure you can find a lawyer who will zealously advocate for his clients

it wont hold up in court if the defendants are the ones who caused the conflict.

depending on the jurisdiction, there can be an argument of escalation... ie i punch somebody in the face, they pull out a knife, and then i shoot them. you could argue that the knife turned a non-lethal conflict into a lethal one, and then you have a self defense argument. that rule isnt universal, though.

in this case, bubbas are the ones who introduced the guns and initiated the conflict, so they wouldnt even have that going for them

You're talking manslaughter, not murder. Ultimately, it was self defense to shoot the idiot charging at them.

[Spurtacular]

the guy was running and bubba got out of his truck and confronted him with a shotgun, after several minutes of chasing him around with a truck and trying to cut him off at various points

They had already called 911. Being a rent-a-cop may be distasteful in your world view; but we've learned what we always have known; it's not murder.
You're just part of the lynch mob, Lite. Let that sink in.

[Spurtacular]

Jeez you're stupid.

Cuckback.

[ChumpDumper]

They had already called 911. Being a rent-a-cop may be distasteful in your world view; but we've learned what we always have known; it's not murder.
You're just part of the lynch mob, Lite. Let that sink in.What's your legal argument here? All I see is emotion.

[spurraider21]

You're talking manslaughter, not murder. Ultimately, it was self defense to shoot the idiot charging at them.
you dont know what manslaughter means

[Spurtacular]

you dont know what manslaughter means

Chump impressions won't get you w's.

[Spurtacular]

What's your legal argument here? All I see is emotion.

Oh, look; David Dook is attention whoring.

[ChumpDumper]

Oh, look; David Dook is attention whoring.I asked you a question.

You're attention whoring by whining about it.

What is your legal argument here? Be sure to use Georgia statute and case law.

[spurraider21]

if you cause the provocation that leads to the killing, that's not going to get your murder reduced to manslaughter

[spurraider21]

I watched that video of the victim being detained and questions (and tazed) in a park and it make me mad. Mostly because even after the guy leaves on foot, the dickhead cop wants to tow the guys vehicle, get inside and find basically anything to arrest him for. That's a real dick move and should get him kicked off the force. His own boss had to tell him to piss off.
yeah he was relentless. asked him multiple times for permission to search (was told to fuck off the first time before the second cop arrived), pretended to smell weed, pretended to see weed, asked the second cop to take a sniff (as if he's a drug dog), and then was practically begging to find any way to have the car towed/searched... even went so far as to basically suggest that if he just chose to arrest him earlier that he then could have searched the car

just ridiculous. doesnt even mean Arbery was acting politely or without suspicion, but the police conduct stands on its own

[Officer Dump Chumper]

Be sure to use Georgia statute and case law.

[Spurtacular]

if you cause the provocation that leads to the killing, that's not going to get your murder reduced to manslaughter

If you want to argue that they shouldn't be charged with man slaughter for this guy's miserable knockout game failure, I'm fine with that.

Murder takes intent. Calling 911 shows that that was not their intent, bruh.

:lol Lynch Mobster Lite

[spurraider21]

If you want to argue that they shouldn't be charged with man slaughter for this guy's miserable knockout game failure, I'm fine with that.

Murder takes intent. Calling 911 shows that that was not their intent, bruh.

:lol Lynch Mobster Lite
the 911 call doesnt show intent

but grabbing guns and deciding to chase after him does. cutting him off and approaching him while brandishing a shotgun does

[Chris]

Was he resisting a citizen's arrest? I don't really care much for gore videos.

[Spurtacular]

the 911 call doesnt show intent

but grabbing guns and deciding to chase after him does. cutting him off and approaching him while brandishing a shotgun does

Hello police: I'd like to report a murder by me and my friend in just a minute.

https://media3.giphy.com/media/qLogsdN71M9mo/200.gif

[Spurtacular]

the 911 call doesnt show intent

but grabbing guns and deciding to chase after him does. cutting him off and approaching him while brandishing a shotgun does

https://www.christchurchcathedral.us/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/hands-up--600x397.jpg

https://assets.rbl.ms/17085078/980x.jpg

This is what it would've been without the video (again).
Your idiot got caught playing knockout. Too bad, so sad.

[pgardn]

https://www.christchurchcathedral.us/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/hands-up--600x397.jpg

https://assets.rbl.ms/17085078/980x.jpg

This is what it would've been without the video (again).
Your idiot got caught playing knockout. Too bad, so sad.

yes this was meant for the police.
not for people in the neighborhood who might want to lynch you.

[spurraider21]

Hello police: I'd like to report a murder by me and my friend in just a minute.

https://media3.giphy.com/media/qLogsdN71M9mo/200.gif
So your claim is nobody is stupid enough to do this but that somebody was stupid enough to randomly try to knock out 2 guys with guns while unarmed

im sorry that 2 white guys not getting away with murdering a black guy is so traumatic for you

[Spurtacular]

So your claim is nobody is stupid enough to do this but that somebody was stupid enough to randomly try to knock out 2 guys with guns while unarmed

im sorry that 2 white guys not getting away with murdering a black guy is so traumatic for you

My argument is you're really saying these "Bubbas" are playing 4D chess like that?

Their intent was clearly not murder.

:cry But muh lynch mob :cry

:lol Lite

[spurraider21]

My argument is you're really saying these "Bubbas" are playing 4D chess like that?

Their intent was clearly not murder.

:cry But muh lynch mob :cry

:lol Lite
Why did they grab guns?

[Spurtacular]

Why did they grab guns?

For protection. They had them and the idiot still decided to play knockout.

:lol Lite

[Spurtacular]

Why did they grab guns?

For protection. They had them and the idiot still decided to play knockout.

:lol Lite

[Blake]

Why did they grab guns?


For protection.

Lol derp doing derp

[pgardn]

For protection. They had them and the idiot still decided to play knockout.

:lol Lite

If they had let the police do their job they would not need protection.
If you decide not to chase down people with guns you dont need the protection in this case.

[Spurtacular]

If they had let the police do their job they would not need protection.
If you decide not to chase down people with guns you dont need the protection in this case.

You gonna stop a movement to outlaw citizen's arrests?

[Spurtacular]

Lol derp doing derp

Board cuck desperately wants a w for a change.

[spurraider21]

For protection. They had them and the idiot still decided to play knockout.

:lol Lite
Protection from the person they went after to pursue? :lmao

[Spurtacular]

Protection from the person they went after to pursue? :lmao

Wow. So, the police shouldn't carry guns. :lmao

[Blake]

Board cuck desperately wants a w for a change.

Derp's world where the board's biggest retard believes he's board mvp.

[Spurtacular]

Derp's world where the board's biggest retard believes he's board mvp.

You're an admitted cuckold. You shouldn't be talking about anyone else's world.

:lol Dat self awareness again.

[Blake]

You're an admitted cuckold. You shouldn't be talking about anyone else's world.

:lol Dat self awareness again.

Retard buzz word logic

[Sleepy Jake]

Retard buzz word logic

You're going to survive this.

[Blake]

Derp not making any sense. Going into comfort derpalt mode now on cue.

[Sleepy Jake]

Derp not making any sense. Going into comfort derpalt mode now on cue.

Keep a level head.

Cos I'll tell you a secret about derptacular. He's actually derptacular's monster.

[spurraider21]

Wow. So, the police shouldn't carry guns. :lmao
bubbas werent police officers, derp

[spurraider21]

You gonna stop a movement to outlaw citizen's arrests?

this is the rule for citizen's arrests in georgia.

arbery didnt commit any crime in their presence or within their immediate knowledge


A private person may arrest an offender if the offense is committed in his presence or within his immediate knowledge. If the offense is a felony and the offender is escaping or attempting to escape, a private person may arrest him upon reasonable and probable grounds of suspicion.

https://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/2010/title-17/chapter-4/article-4/17-4-60/

[Spurtacular]

bubbas werent police officers, derp

Your logic was that they shouldn't protect themselves all the same, philo.

[Spurtacular]

this is the rule for citizen's arrests in georgia.

arbery didnt commit any crime in their presence or within their immediate knowledge

https://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/2010/title-17/chapter-4/article-4/17-4-60/

Trespassing not an offense?

[spurraider21]

Trespassing not an offense?
a) not a felony. you cant chase somebody down to arrest them unless its a felony (read the law above). you can still arrest somebody for a misdemeanor (most commonly a store-owner can detain a shoplifter) but the law specifies that somebody escaping cannot be arrested unless it was a felony (they want to avoid exactly the situation that happened, putting people needlessly in harms way)

b) they didnt witness the trespass in question. they just saw him running on the street. has to be committed within their presence or immediate knowledge (read the law above)

c) you cannot use more force than is reasonable to make the arrest

:lmao citizen's arrest at gunpoint over trespassing?

[spurraider21]

Your logic was that they shouldn't protect themselves all the same, philo.
no my logic is that you shouldnt grab guns just to pursue somebody and create the deadly situation.

the only reason anybody "feared for their lives" is because bubbas introduced guns into the equation

[Spurtacular]

no my logic is that you shouldnt grab guns just to pursue somebody and create the deadly situation.

the only reason anybody "feared for their lives" is because bubbas introduced guns into the equation

I have no problem with you living your life that way. But the parameters for the debate is did they break the law?

Based on what I know and have heard, I have seen nothing that says this is so.

I'm open to the possibility of learning otherwise; but your snowflake tears won't make it so.

[spurraider21]

I have no problem with you living your life that way. But the parameters for the debate is did they break the law?

Based on what I know and have heard, I have seen nothing that says this is so.

I'm open to the possibility of learning otherwise; but your snowflake tears won't make it so.
i posted the law on citizens arrests above. it doesnt apply. they also broke the law by chasing down and killing the guy in the street

[Spurtacular]

a) not a felony. you cant chase somebody down to arrest them unless its a felony (read the law above). you can still arrest somebody for a misdemeanor (most commonly a store-owner can detain a shoplifter) but the law specifies that somebody escaping cannot be arrested unless it was a felony (they want to avoid exactly the situation that happened, putting people needlessly in harms way)

b) they didnt witness the trespass in question. they just saw him running on the street. has to be committed within their presence or immediate knowledge (read the law above)

c) you cannot use more force than is reasonable to make the arrest

:lmao citizen's arrest at gunpoint over trespassing?


A private person may arrest an offender if the offense is committed in his presence or within his immediate knowledge.

AA fit the description of the man who had committed the trespassing crime. The men acted upon this immediate knowledge and attempted a citizen's arrest.

[Spurtacular]

i posted the law on citizens arrests above. it doesnt apply. they also broke the law by chasing down and killing the guy in the street

They had immediate knowledge of a crime for which Arbery had committed.

[Blake]

They had immediate knowledge of a crime for which Arbery had committed.

No, that's not what that means, and walking into a vacant structure isn't a felony.

Jeez you're retarded. You should thank spurraider for having the patience to explain this shit to you.

[spurraider21]

They had immediate knowledge of a crime for which Arbery had committed.
what crime committed by arbery did they have immediate knowledge of?

note that georgia law has held more than once that "immediate knowledge" is synonymous with the crime being committed in their presence

https://i.gyazo.com/bfb8bd59a36a841b9388c156de5b6f39.png

https://law.justia.com/cases/georgia/supreme-court/1977/31907-1.html

[Spurtacular]

No, that's not what that means, and walking into a vacant structure isn't a felony.

Jeez you're retarded. You should thank spurraider for having the patience to explain this shit to you.

The law states that a person can be citizen arrested for an offense (misdemeanor or felony) if the person has witnessed it or has "immediate knowledge".Thus we see that the citizen arrest is lawful.

The second part, philo is just trying to confuse the matter. It's basically saying that if the crime rises to a felony, then anyone may citizen arrest the potential offender even on just suspicion rather than having to hit the higher standard of having witnessed the crime or having "immediate knowledge."

Ten leagues, bruh.

[spurraider21]

The law states that a person can be citizen arrested for an offense (misdemeanor or felony) if the person has witnessed it or has "immediate knowledge".Thus we see that the citizen arrest is lawful.
so what crime was committed by arbery which the bubbas had immediate knowledge of?

again, as stated above, georgia law holds "immediate knowledge" and "in the presence of" as synonymous

[ChumpDumper]

:lol "thus"

[Spurtacular]

so what crime was committed by arbery which the bubbas had immediate knowledge of?

again, as stated above, georgia law holds "immediate knowledge" and "in the presence of" as synonymous

The write-up example you give is based on evidentiary knowledge and not "in the presence of".

:lol Lite

[Bleke]

https://thumbs.gfycat.com/WetDopeyFly-size_restricted.gif

How did this happen? Muh Mentor Lite is a lawyer and everything!

[ElNono]

so what crime was committed by arbery which the bubbas had immediate knowledge of?

again, as stated above, georgia law holds "immediate knowledge" and "in the presence of" as synonymous

:lol why do you argue with ignorant?

[Spurtacular]

:lol ElNono been reduced to an ankle biter.

[ElNono]

:lol yah, that's what's going on in here

[Spurtacular]

:lol Yea, "reduced" was generous. Frankly, it's right up your alley.

[ElNono]

sure, you also thought rolling out a sock puppet was really showing him :lol

smh

[spurraider21]

The write-up example you give is based on evidentiary knowledge and not "in the presence of".

:lol Lite
No. The court relied on other rulings that an admission is tantamount to the crime being committed in their presence.

What crime did arbery commit within the immediate knowledge of the bubbas?

[DMC]

I don't think the legal aspect matters that much. The lives of the two perps were not in immediate danger but they put themselves and the victim into a very hazardous situation by pursuing. There's no way the victim would have known anything about who was pursuing, and when two fat white bearded rednecks with guns jump out of a truck after chasing you, you know you cannot outrun the long gun so what are you going to do?

I think this is the point. There was no reason any trespassing or even theft of property (of someone else) should ever be escalated to armed pursuit by civilians. This isn't the wild west.

[spurraider21]

I don't think the legal aspect matters that much. The lives of the two perps were not in immediate danger but they put themselves and the victim into a very hazardous situation by pursuing. There's no way the victim would have known anything about who was pursuing, and when two fat white bearded rednecks with guns jump out of a truck after chasing you, you know you cannot outrun the long gun so what are you going to do?

I think this is the point. There was no reason any trespassing or even theft of property (of someone else) should ever be escalated to armed pursuit by civilians. This isn't the wild west.
All true.

Just wanted to let derp know that his “citizens arrest” crap fails at all levels

[Spurtacular]

No. The court relied on other rulings that an admission is tantamount to the crime being committed in their presence.

What crime did arbery commit within the immediate knowledge of the bubbas?

Immediate knowledge is what it is. You're trying to pretend the case limited that when all it did was uphold the law.

[spurraider21]

Immediate knowledge is what it is.
what crime did arbery commit within the immediate knowledge of the bubbas?



You're trying to pretend the case limited that when all it did was uphold the law.


The terms "in the presence of" and "within his immediate knowledge" have been held to be synonymous. Piedmont Hotel Co. v. Henderson, 9 Ga. App. 672, 681 (72 SE 51) (1911). See also Humphrey v. State, 231 Ga. 855 (204 SE2d 603) (1974). The Court of Appeals recently reached a similar result in *550 Moore v. State, 128 Ga. App. 20 (195 SE2d 275) (1973), where it was held that an admission of an offense by an accused to the arresting party is tantamount to the commission of the offense in the presence of the party making the arrest. Whether the offense is said to be in the presence of, or within the immediate knowledge of, the arresting party, the result is the same as the two phrases mean the same thing.
https://law.justia.com/cases/georgia/supreme-court/1977/31907-1.html

[Spurtacular]

what crime did arbery commit within the immediate knowledge of the bubbas?

Trespassing.

[spurraider21]

Trespassing.
bubbas never claimed to have witnessed the trespassing caught on video that day

they first saw him running down the street and thought they recognized him from other security footage of other break-ins.

none of those happened within their presence or immediate knowledge, nor did they have any certainty that arbery was in fact the guy behind them

https://i.gyazo.com/0ca1f696abe8162a257bac5519ce7e0d.png

[Blake]

bubbas never claimed to have witnessed the trespassing caught on video that day

they first saw him running down the street and thought they recognized him from other security footage of other break-ins.

none of those happened within their presence or immediate knowledge, nor did they have any certainty that arbery was in fact the guy behind them

https://i.gyazo.com/0ca1f696abe8162a257bac5519ce7e0d.png

"The other night"

Smh

[Blake]

Trespassing.

Lol. There's no way derp has looked up the legal definition of trespassing.

[Spurtacular]

Lol. There's no way derp has looked up the legal definition of trespassing.

I'm pretty sure it falls under the quite stringent definition of "offense", board cuckold.

:lol Today's ankle biter

[Blake]

I'm pretty sure it falls under the quite stringent definition of "offense", board cuckold.

:lol Today's ankle biter

:lol no it doesn't board fucktard. Not in this case. You can't buzzword your way out of this.

[Spurtacular]

:lol no it doesn't board fucktard. Not in this case. You can't buzzword your way out of this.

Lawyer Cuckold with the tried and proven nuh uh.

[Blake]

You can't buzzword your way out of this.

But you'll try. That's all you know how to do.

[Spurtacular]

But you'll try. That's all you know how to do.

Don't try to be Chump. You're much shittier at it.

[spurraider21]

"The other night"

Smh
i thought he might have a gun today because the other night i saw him reach into his pocket :lmao

[FrostKing]

https://i.ibb.co/VTqY4ds/IMG-20200527-WA0012.jpg

Also the Birdwatcher

[spurraider21]

none of that has anything to do with the killing that happened in february 2020

[Spurtacular]

https://i.ibb.co/VTqY4ds/IMG-20200527-WA0012.jpg

Also the Birdwatcher

:lol The Jogger

Yea, the media has lost all credibility.

[Brandon Bass]

https://twitter.com/seth_mgreen/status/1265441219536130049?s=21

[FrostKing]

https://twitter.com/seth_mgreen/status/1265441219536130049?s=21
“In 2019 in the US, 19 unarmed white people were killed by police vs 9 unarmed black people. "

[spurraider21]

“In 2019 in the US, 19 unarmed white people were killed by police vs 9 unarmed black people. "
source? not doubting the numbers, just curious

and more to the point is what happened to each of those officers in those instances... how many of them were disciplined, how many were prosecuted

[David Hogg]

https://twitter.com/lordbalvin/status/1268564920788017155?s=21

[Trill Clinton]

https://twitter.com/lordbalvin/status/1268564920788017155?s=21

sickening.

[spurraider21]

1268565872945266688

[spurraider21]

bUt He WaS aT a VaCaNt HoUsE!

[Trainwreck2100]

https://twitter.com/lordbalvin/status/1268564920788017155?s=21

I mean if he didn't want to be a victim of systemic racism he shouldn't have been born black.

[baseline bum]

bUt He WaS aT a VaCaNt HoUsE!

He stole their water

[spurraider21]

1268591292638007297

[spurraider21]

1268572349781114887

[Blake]

https://twitter.com/lordbalvin/status/1268564920788017155?s=21

YEAH BUT LOL "JOGGING"

[Blake]

He stole their water

Shit I bet the water wasn't even turned on

[David Hogg]

I mean if he didn't want to be a victim of systemic racism he shouldn't have been born black.
He should have just pulled himself up by his bootstraps and been born white!

[spurraider21]

1268565872945266688 Spurtacular

[ElNono]

:lol usual suspects running away from this thread faster than Avante in a TCAP show...

[David Hogg]

Spurtacular (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=49615)
I’m sure he’ll take a thoughtful, nuanced look at this revelation and really reflect on what he may have gotten wrong about this story, and look to amend his previous-oh who am I kidding, he’s gonna quadruple down on the stupidity and say it’s still Arbery’s fault.

[spurraider21]

I’m sure he’ll take a thoughtful, nuanced look at this revelation and really reflect on what he may have gotten wrong about this story, and look to amend his previous-oh who am I kidding he’s gonna quadruple down on the stupidity and say it’s still Arbery’s fault.
hes still going to claim that a crime was committed within the immediate knowledge of the killers. and not just a crime, but a felony which would justify them chasing him to execute a citizen's arrest

[MultiTroll]

These two were very lucky that someone caught their self defense on video.
Otherwise, a Chumpian prosecutor may have tried to make a name for himself like in the Trayon case.

[spurraider21]

entire hearing is here

https://twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1YqxoQlLbPMGv

really starts around 20 minute mark or so

[Spurtacular]

What does that change, Lite?

[spurraider21]

What does that change, Lite?
let's start here

AA fit the description of the man who had committed the trespassing crime. The men acted upon this immediate knowledge and attempted a citizen's arrest.


1268565872945266688
do you still claim they had "immediate knowledge" of a crime committed by arbery?

[Slob]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uY6INyOaLGs&t=8779s

[Spurtacular]

let's start here



do you still claim they had "immediate knowledge" of a crime committed by arbery?

Their 911 call said he fit the description of a burglar.

[spurraider21]

Their 911 call said he fit the description of a burglar.
does that "gut feeling" constitute "immediate knowledge" which the georgia supreme court has said is synonymous with the crime being committed in their presence?

does "fitting the description" amount to a concrete identification that would justify placing somebody in citizen's arrest at gunpoint?

[Spurtacular]

does that "gut feeling" constitute "immediate knowledge" which the georgia supreme court has said is synonymous with the crime being committed in their presence?

does "fitting the description" amount to a concrete identification that would justify placing somebody in citizen's arrest at gunpoint?

Well, was it at gunpoint? Certainly, they used their guns on the idiot who attacked them.

I don't know how fit the description is morphing into gut feeling to your mind.

[spurraider21]

Well, was it at gunpoint? Certainly, they used their guns on the idiot who attacked them.

I don't know how fit the description is morphing into gut feeling to your mind.
they had a hunch that he looks like the guy from earlier footage. no actual knowledge. no crime was committed in their presence.

none of that shit applies, derp

[Trill Clinton]

1268608474801418240

Damn they even hit Ahmaud with the truck...he had no chance smh.


1268572349781114887

[Spurtacular]

Damn... the truck... had no chance smh.

Well, playing knockout against a guy holding a gun, so....

[Spurtacular]

they had a hunch that he looks like the guy from earlier footage. no actual knowledge. no crime was committed in their presence. they didnt even know about him having gone into that vacant house on the day of his death

none of that shit applies, derp

911 call ain't talking about hunches. Said straight-up he fit the description.

[spurraider21]

911 call ain't talking about hunches. Said straight-up he fit the description.
oh so "fits the description" (not a positive ID). that means they could get into a truck, hit him with it, he runs away, they cut him off again, get out of the truck brandishing a shotgun and start barking orders at him?

:lol these guys are going away

[spurraider21]

911 call ain't talking about hunches. Said straight-up he fit the description.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NvaQP47Vq0

feel free to point out where in this call he says the guy fit some description of some security footage?

[spurraider21]

this is not a citizen's arrest case :lol

[Spurtacular]

oh so "fits the description" (not a positive ID). that means they could get into a truck, hit him with it, he runs away, they cut him off again, get out of the truck brandishing a shotgun and start barking orders at him?

:lol these guys are going away

Well, after that Bryan guy was squeezed into giving new, quite possibly false testimony by the state authorities to avoid prosecution, perhaps your lynch mob is feeling better about your chances.

[Spurtacular]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NvaQP47Vq0

feel free to point out where in this call he says the guy fit some description of some security footage?

Well, he did say he caught the guy trespassing, so there's your immediate knowlege.

:lol Lite.

[spurraider21]

Well, he did say he caught the guy trespassing, so there's your immediate knowlege.

:lol Lite.
trespassing is not a felony, so chasing him is not warranted by law

https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=285517&p=10152502&viewfull=1#post10152502

[Spurtacular]

trespassing is not a felony, so chasing him is not warranted by law

https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=285517&p=10152502&viewfull=1#post10152502

It doesn't have to be a felony.

Yea, I already explained how you got that wrong.

BTW, how stupid would that law be if a someone was engaging in criminal activity and a determination on whether
to apprehend was based on laymen having meticulous knowledge of criminal law?

:lol Lite

[MultiTroll]

feel free to point out where in this call he says the guy fit some description of some security footage?
Why is Bubba Jr. panting? And what are the whistles at 1:02?

Are him and Pa fapping over the prospect of shooting a black man?