trump threatens to shut down twitter because they created a fact check button on his tweets

[Trill Clinton]

1265649545410744321


chief twitter fingers is mad as hell:lol

Jack:toast

[koriwhat]

Good! Fuck silicon valley and especially jack Dorsey's twitter!

[Spurminator]

Big Government Republican threatens to regulate business for exercising First Amendment Right to comment on public statements.

[TimDunkem]

Big Government Republican threatens to regulate business for exercising First Amendment Right to comment on public statements.

[BD24]

Big Government Republican threatens to regulate business for exercising First Amendment Right to comment on public statements.

[ChumpDumper]

Big Government Republican threatens to regulate business for exercising First Amendment Right to comment on public statements.

[DMX7]

Big Government Republican threatens to regulate business for exercising First Amendment Right to comment on public statements.

[Spurtacular]

:lol "fact check"

[Nother Level]

:lol "fact check"

[ChumpHumper]

:lol "fact check"

[Trill Clinton]

Big Government Republican threatens to regulate business for exercising First Amendment Right to comment on public statements.

[LaSíSí]

:lol "fact check"

[Bleke]

:lol "fact check"

[ChumpDumper]

:lol derp's meltdown

[Nathan89]

This is the gorilla that Trump should take on but his strategy is shit. He should create accounts on alternative platforms. He should get every Republican in government to do the same. Then they should post on the other platforms every other day while advertising their actions on the main platforms.

[Spurminator]

The President of the United States should create a State-Run social media platform where he can push propaganda without impediment or editorial oversight! I'm totally conservative!

[tholdren]

Hope so. Chumpdumper El nono and their Karen crew will have to find something new.

[LkrFan]

Good! Fuck silicon valley and especially jack Dorsey's twitter!

https://twitter.com/marioinny1/status/1265683553003716610?s=19

:lol

[ChumpDumper]

https://twitter.com/marioinny1/status/1265683553003716610?s=19

:lol:lmao

[koriwhat]

Hope so. Chumpdumper El nono and their Karen crew will have to find something new.

:lmao

[Spurminator]

In all likelihood nothing will come of this, and both Dorsey and Trump know it.

It's not about actual regulation, it's just more pig's feed to promote conservatives' feelings of persecution. The whole thing would fall apart in court. But that doesn't matter to Dear Leader's flock of useful idiots.

[Nathan89]

.

If I said anything close to that then you'd have a point. But I didn't so you don't.

[hater]

1st ammendment trumptards heads exploding like popcorn

[Spurtacular]

Hope so. Chumpdumper El nono and their Karen crew will have to find something new.

:lol

[Nathan89]

"He should create accounts on alternative platforms."

"The President of the United States should create a State-Run social media platform where he can push propaganda without impediment or editorial oversight!"

I'm not sure how you can make this interpretation. I'm curious if it's intentional or not.

[DMX7]

:lol derp's meltdown

He busted out all his alter ego user names for that meltdown, LMAO!!! :lol

[Spurtacular]

1st ammendment trumptards heads exploding like popcorn

The issue isn't free speech in this instance. It's targeting. If Twitter can't remain impartial, that presents serious issues.

[TSA]

Twitter is no longer a platform and is now a publisher.

[ChumpDumper]

:lmao TSA's AR15.com law degree

[hater]

The issue isn't free speech in this instance. It's targeting. If Twitter can't remain impartial, that presents serious issues.

targeting what? misleading statements? I have no problem with them putting a label to misleading statements


trumps statement was misleading as he has provided zero evidence

[boutons_deux]

Twitter is no longer a platform and is now a publisher.

govt is forbidden by 1st Amendment to infringe on Freedom of the Press

[Spurminator]

"He should create accounts on alternative platforms."

"The President of the United States should create a State-Run social media platform where he can push propaganda without impediment or editorial oversight!"

I'm not sure how you can make this interpretation. I'm curious if it's intentional or not.

What alternate platforms do not already have a Trump presence, and what do you suppose is the end game of focusing efforts a platform that does not do editorial oversight on his and other Republican claims?

Don't insult our intelligence. You don't care about truth.

[Spurminator]

Instead of twisting yourselves trying to figure out the best way for the POTUS to present his propaganda unimpeded, here's a better idea that's even easier to execute: Don't lie.

[Nathan89]

What alternate platforms do not already have a Trump presence, and what do you suppose is the end game of focusing efforts a platform that does not do editorial oversight on his and other Republican claims?

Don't insult our intelligence. You don't care about truth.

"Alternative platforms" is a reference to non mainstream platforms and to my knowledge he doesn't have a presence on any of them.

The endgame of getting people away from platforms that add biased messages seems pretty obvious.

In the process of twisting my comment to absurdity you claim I'm the person that does not care about truth. Ok.

[Spurtacular]

targeting what? misleading statements? I have no problem with them putting a label to misleading statements


trumps statement was misleading as he has provided zero evidence

:cry Provide evidence in 140 characters :cry

:lol You been shilling your ass off trying desperately to get back in favor with the chumpettes :lol


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2VF_YjqPXQ&t=320s

[Spurminator]

"Alternative platforms" is a reference to non mainstream platforms and to my knowledge he doesn't have a presence on any of them.

The endgame of getting people away from platforms that add biased messages seems pretty obvious.

In the process of twisting my comment to absurdity you claim I'm the person that does not care about truth. Ok.

You want the President and Republican politicians to move en masse to a smaller platform that you can't even name, where their messages will be unimpeded by editorial criticism or context. If the President of the United States uses an account other than Twitter to communicate with the public, that platform becomes mainstream. And you want that platform to be friendly towards, and uncritical of, outright dishonesty by the most powerful people in the country.

You're advocating for State Media. You're a fascist piece of shit and a coward.

[tholdren]

Instead of twisting yourselves trying to figure out the best way for the POTUS to present his propaganda unimpeded, here's a better idea that's even easier to execute: Don't lie.

Cdc taking notes.

[Nathan89]

You want the President and Republican politicians to move en masse to a smaller platform that you can't even name, where their messages will be unimpeded by editorial criticism or context. If the President of the United States uses an account other than Twitter to communicate with the public, that platform becomes mainstream. And you want that platform to be friendly towards, and uncritical of, outright dishonesty by the most powerful people in the country.

You're advocating for State Media. You're a fascist piece of shit and a coward.

I can name some of them. I'm on some of them.

The platform doesn't need to counter the opinions of the President with the opinions that they agree with. Feel free to provide your commentary to counter it in the comments.

No. You are a liar. And earlier I was wondering if you did it intentionally or unintentionally but now I realize you are just a liar that makes shit up. Have fun doing that. There is no reason to respond any further to your bullshit.

[benefactor]

:lol President ManKaren

[Nathan89]

https://twitter.com/Timcast/status/1265679548944916482?s=20

[ElNono]

Big Government Republican threatens to regulate business for exercising First Amendment Right to comment on public statements.

[benefactor]

^:cry

[BSfromTX]

This is the gorilla that Trump should take on but his strategy is shit. He should create accounts on alternative platforms. He should get every Republican in government to do the same. Then they should post on the other platforms every other day while advertising their actions on the main platforms.


Hate to say it, but the right is just as bad as the left and this is just a small sample of one's chosen party supporting the opposite of what you thought it was against. Once you can accept that, you will begin to experience a sense of freedom.

Censorship is as rampant as ever and media is in full propaganda mode. Scary times. I'm pretty sure Trump and Pelosi enjoy cocktails together watching the masses fall for all this bs.

[Spurminator]

I can name some of them. I'm on some of them.

The platform doesn't need to counter the opinions of the President with the opinions that they agree with. Feel free to provide your commentary to counter it in the comments.

No. You are a liar. And earlier I was wondering if you did it intentionally or unintentionally but now I realize you are just a liar that makes shit up. Have fun doing that. There is no reason to respond any further to your bullshit.

Fascist pussy.

[ElNono]

https://twitter.com/marioinny1/status/1265683553003716610?s=19

:lol

:lmao

[tholdren]

Now you won't ever be able to get your 130k El nono. Sad

[ElNono]

Hope so. Chumpdumper El nono and their Karen crew will have to find something new.


Now you won't ever be able to get your 130k El nono. Sad


:lol I have a fan... keep thinking about me.

[LkrFan]

:lol President ManKaren

:lmao

[ElNono]

:lmao TSA's AR15.com law degree

:lol

[LkrFan]

:lmao TSA's AR15.com law degree

Oh snap! :rollin :lmao :rollin

[ElNono]

I can name some of them. I'm on some of them.

The platform doesn't need to counter the opinions of the President with the opinions that they agree with. Feel free to provide your commentary to counter it in the comments.

No. You are a liar. And earlier I was wondering if you did it intentionally or unintentionally but now I realize you are just a liar that makes shit up. Have fun doing that. There is no reason to respond any further to your bullshit.

Is this supposed to work like OANN, which nobody watches?

[Reck]

RIP Chrisbot.

[Nathan89]

Is this supposed to work like OANN, which nobody watches?

There is no connection between the success of OANN and this tbh

[tholdren]

:lol I have a fan... keep thinking about me.
Easy to spot a karen

[vy65]

The issue isn't free speech in this instance. It's targeting. If Twitter can't remain impartial, that presents serious issues.

Twitter isn't the government you downs-syndrome having piece of shit.

[spurraider21]

Big Government Republican threatens to regulate business for exercising First Amendment Right to comment on public statements.

[vy65]

Oh, and ...


Big Government Republican threatens to regulate business for exercising First Amendment Right to comment on public statements.

[tholdren]

Twitter isn't the government you downs-syndrome having piece of shit.
Wrong

[Nathan89]

https://twitter.com/Timcast/status/1265679548944916482?s=20
Reality

Vs

The spin

"If the President of the United States uses an account other than Twitter to communicate with the public, that platform becomes mainstream. And you want that platform to be friendly towards, and uncritical of, outright dishonesty by the most powerful people in the country."

[Spurminator]

Reality

Vs

The spin

"If the President of the United States uses an account other than Twitter to communicate with the public, that platform becomes mainstream. And you want that platform to be friendly towards, and uncritical of, outright dishonesty by the most powerful people in the country."

See, you can't quit me.

Imagine sharing a tweet theorizing that Twitter would treat comments from some "normal conservative" with 50 followers the same way it treats the President of the United States. That's a slippery slope wider than your mother's asshole.

Keep semen shielding the fascist, Nathan. You're doing great.

[tholdren]

See, you can't quit me.

Imagine sharing a tweet theorizing that Twitter would treat comments from some "normal conservative" with 50 followers the same way it treats the President of the United States. That's a slippery slope wider than your mother's asshole.

Keep semen shielding the fascist, Nathan. You're doing great.
Sweet name calling

[Nathan89]

https://twitter.com/jawillick/status/1265408325866291202?s=20

[ElNono]

Easy to spot a karen

can you say karen one more time, tbh? I know it makes you feel edgy and shit, but we all know better.

[ElNono]

There is no connection between the success of OANN and this tbh

lol @ success.

He should definitely do that though. I think Twitter would be much better for it.

[ElNono]

https://twitter.com/jawillick/status/1265408325866291202?s=20

Not really.

[tholdren]

can you say karen one more time, tbh? I know it makes you feel edgy and shit, but we all know better.
3 posts in a row...... almost winning the internet!!!

[FrostKing]

https://i.ibb.co/K7vjqcD/46287-1.png

[Spurminator]

https://i.ibb.co/K7vjqcD/46287-1.png

I support Twitter extending fact-checking footers to other users as well. They should do whatever they can to prevent falsehoods like this from being spread. The President is a good place to start, given his reach and his position. You guys would complain about fact checks on Dear Leader regardless of how many were subjected to it.

[spurraider21]

i agree that pics like that should be fact checked, but i would assume their dedicated staff focuses on accounts with larger followings/reach. i dont know who the people are that supposedly tweeted that pic, or how many views/clicks they've gotten

[ChumpDumper]

https://twitter.com/jawillick/status/1265408325866291202?s=20Only if some idiot infers that.

[FrostKing]

I support Twitter extending fact-checking footers to other users as well. They should do whatever they can to prevent falsehoods like this from being spread. The President is a good place to start, given his reach and his position. You guys would complain about fact checks on Dear Leader regardless of how many were subjected to it.
Twitter isn't even on the same level as Wikipedia. Disagree with this encroachment into hate speech and scientifically accurate? As if we are even all in agreement on most issues.

[Spurminator]

Twitter isn't even on the same level as Wikipedia. Disagree with this encroachment into hate speech and scientifically accurate? As if we are even all in agreement on most issues.

There's no agreement/disagreement on whether the cop and the MWGA hat are the same person. It's a question of fact.

Likewise, if Twitter wants to add links or context to Presidential statements so users can easily get more information or decide for themselves, I see no problem with that. They could have just removed his tweet, but they didn't.

[ChumpDumper]

https://i.ibb.co/K7vjqcD/46287-1.pngThey all look alike to me.

I don't know why the one on the left is showing off his turd.

[Millennial_Messiah]

Executive order to enforce a private company to cease business operations within the USA is absolutely 100% within the authority guidelines of a U.S. President as per the Constitution.

Nothing to see or complain about here.

[Millennial_Messiah]

Is this supposed to work like OANN, which nobody watches?

OANN has gorgeous, model-beautiful, millennial women.

MSNBC has fat, ugly, androgynous bull dyke hipster-y cunts.

#LeftWingJealousy

[ChumpDumper]

Executive order to enforce a private company to cease business operations within the USA is absolutely 100% within the authority guidelines of a U.S. President as per the Constitution.

Nothing to see or complain about here.Could you cite that part the Constitution?

[Nathan89]

lol @ success.

He should definitely do that though. I think Twitter would be much better for it.

Success or failure is how it should be read. I wasn't calling them a success.

[Nathan89]

I support Twitter extending fact-checking footers to other users as well. They should do whatever they can to prevent falsehoods like this from being spread. The President is a good place to start, given his reach and his position. You guys would complain about fact checks on Dear Leader regardless of how many were subjected to it.

They aren't fact checking. They are injecting their opinion.

[Millennial_Messiah]

Could you cite that part the Constitution?


Article II of the U.S. Constitution vests executive powers in the President, makes him the commander in chief, and requires that the President “shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” Laws can also give additional powers to the President.
While an executive order can have the same effect as a federal law under certain circumstances, Congress can pass a new law to override an executive order, subject to a presidential veto.


(Good luck getting 67 Senators to override a veto to the rejection of an executive order. :lol)

[ChumpDumper]

Article II of the U.S. Constitution vests executive powers in the President, makes him the commander in chief, and requires that the President “shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” Laws can also give additional powers to the President.
While an executive order can have the same effect as a federal law under certain circumstances, Congress can pass a new law to override an executive order, subject to a presidential veto.


(Good luck getting 67 Senators to override a veto to the rejection of an executive order. :lol)That's not a citation from the Constitution. That's wikipedia. And it doesn't even support your contention.:lol

[Nathan89]

i agree that pics like that should be fact checked, but i would assume their dedicated staff focuses on accounts with larger followings/reach. i dont know who the people are that supposedly tweeted that pic, or how many views/clicks they've gotten

I'm going to assume they'll treat conservatives like Dems treated New York blacks under stop and frisk.

[Nathan89]

"These agenda driven people injecting their opinion in effort to change the election results is fine by me."

[ChumpDumper]

"These agenda driven people injecting their opinion in effort to change the election results is fine by me."That's what Trump is trying to do and it's fine by you.

[Nathan89]

Twitter doesn't care about the truth. They are injecting opinion on top of the opinion of others. They are attempting to alter the outcome of the election.

This is why big tech is a threat to our country

This was another great leap towards the inevitable division of the United States.

[ChumpDumper]

Twitter doesn't care about the truth.Do you?

[LkrFan]

https://twitter.com/gtconway3d/status/1265733265543041025?s=19

:lmao

[DMX7]

Twitter doesn't care about the truth. They are injecting opinion on top of the opinion of others. They are attempting to alter the outcome of the election.


So you're against free speech now? And you apparently think Twitter's "opinion" is more persuasive that Trump's if you think it will alter the outcome of the election.

[Nathan89]

The only way forward in the face of leftist authoritarians running social media is for other platforms to emerge. This will accelerate the divide in this country. This is the path to the inevitable division of the US. You people lack foresight.

[Spurminator]

They aren't fact checking. They are injecting their opinion.

:lol

Even if that was the case... Commentary on a statement by the leader of the free world?

Oh no! What kind of crazy dystopia have we become??

[Will Hunting]

The only way forward in the face of leftist authoritarians running social media is for other platforms to emerge. This will accelerate the divide in this country. This is the path to the inevitable division of the US. You people lack foresight.
:lol division of the US. States like Mississippi and Alabama would be insolvement without all the federal subsidies they get.

[ChumpDumper]

The only way forward in the face of leftist authoritarians running social media is for other platforms to emerge. This will accelerate the divide in this country. This is the path to the inevitable division of the US. You people lack foresight.You lack perspective and only seek to confirm your bias.

[Spurminator]

The only way forward in the face of leftist authoritarians running social media is for other platforms to emerge. This will accelerate the divide in this country. This is the path to the inevitable division of the US. You people lack foresight.

If they were leftist authoritarians, they would censor Trump or ban him altogether. Right wing propaganda and fake news spreads further and better than ever before, explicitly BECAUSE of social media.

You're such a whiny little bitch.

[spurraider21]

Twitter doesn't care about the truth. They are injecting opinion on top of the opinion of others. They are attempting to alter the outcome of the election.
lets assume just for the sake of argument that we agree about the first two sentences.

do you have an issue with corporations attempting to alter the outcomes of elections? should companies not be able to endorse candidates or run ads? should they be allowed to make campaign contributions? why is social media the exception?

they're not foreign agents or foreign governments. what's wrong with americans trying to influence the outcomes of elections? thats what campaigns are all about

[Nathan89]

:lol

Even if that was the case... Commentary on a statement by the leader of the free world?

Oh no! What kind of crazy dystopia have we become??

There is plenty of commentary in the comment section. You are a proven liar so nobody should be surprised at you trying to distort reality.

[Nathan89]

:lol division of the US. States like Mississippi and Alabama would be insolvement without all the federal subsidies they get.

Poor countries exist all over the world. People make do.

[Will Hunting]

lets assume just for the sake of argument that we agree about the first two sentences.

do you have an issue with corporations attempting to alter the outcomes of elections? should companies not be able to endorse candidates or run ads? should they be allowed to make campaign contributions? why is social media the exception?

they're not foreign agents or foreign governments. what's wrong with americans trying to influence the outcomes of elections? thats what campaigns are all about
Corporations influencing elections is one of those things Nathan will probably say “everyone knows is wrong” as justification for why he’s constantly bitching about Twitter while he’s never bitching about the Koch Brothers having politicians in their back pocket.

[Will Hunting]

Poor countries exist all over the world. People make do.
The dirty south broken off from the part of America that pays the bills would certainly be one of them.

[TSA]

https://twitter.com/LevineJonathan/status/1265457578215124995

"fact checker" :lol

[boutons_deux]

https://scontent-dfw5-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/l/t1.0-9/101223993_2620065691601897_373959899064827904_n.jp g?_nc_cat=111&_nc_sid=1480c5&_nc_ohc=NMan-_zdSsMAX_M35gf&_nc_ht=scontent-dfw5-1.xx&oh=a2ff68efb5d0f43c4c3dcea779d491da&oe=5EF3D0E1

[spurraider21]

https://twitter.com/LevineJonathan/status/1265457578215124995

"fact checker" :lol
one must be devoid of personal opinions to be a fact checker?

[Nathan89]

lets assume just for the sake of argument that we agree about the first two sentences.

do you have an issue with corporations attempting to alter the outcomes of elections? should companies not be able to endorse candidates or run ads? should they be allowed to make campaign contributions? why is social media the exception?

they're not foreign agents or foreign governments. what's wrong with americans trying to influence the outcomes of elections? thats what campaigns are all about

I have a problem with their unique usage of their platform. Yes, I see it as different than individuals making donations. They have unprecedented power and they wield it with a biased agenda. That's why big tech is a threat to our country. That's why I'm a proponent of a mass effort to shift people from very biased platforms like Twitter.

[Nathan89]

The dirty south broken off from the part of America that pays the bills would certainly be one of them.

Reliance on others makes you weak. The South will improve. I'm not concerned.

[TSA]

https://twitter.com/HawleyMO/status/1265737658082430977

[TSA]

Had these "fact checkers" been in place 4 years ago would you stupid fucks still have fallen for Russiagate? :lmao

[Nathan89]

If they were leftist authoritarians, they would censor Trump or ban him altogether. Right wing propaganda and fake news spreads further and better than ever before, explicitly BECAUSE of social media.

You're such a whiny little bitch.

One of their employees did ban Trump. Also that would be a very stupid decision for their business. The lack of such a decision is evidence of anything.

[Millennial_Messiah]

That's what Trump is trying to do and it's fine by you.
If you don't like Trump? Don't like our country? Then get the fuck out and move to a different country where the policies are more to your liking. Nobody is stopping you. Same goes for boutons_deux. Instead of whining and bitching about the USA, why not move to somewhere else where you don't have to be a whiny bitch? The U.S.A. will always be a beacon of capitalism, federalism, patriotism, supply-side economics, and minimal handouts. If you don't like that? GTFO and move to another country.

[ChumpDumper]

Had these "fact checkers" been in place 4 years ago would you stupid fucks still have fallen for Russiagate? :lmao

https://www.washingtonian.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/MG_4688.jpg

[ChumpDumper]

If you don't like Trump? Don't like our country? Then get the fuck out and move to a different country where the policies are more to your liking. Nobody is stopping you. Same goes for boutons_deux. Instead of whining and bitching about the USA, why not move to somewhere else where you don't have to be a whiny bitch? The U.S.A. will always be a beacon of capitalism, federalism, patriotism, supply-side economics, and minimal handouts. If you don't like that? GTFO and move to another country.:lol meltdown

[Nathan89]

https://twitter.com/HawleyMO/status/1265737658082430977

They aren't going to do anything.

[Nathan89]

If you don't like Trump? Don't like our country? Then get the fuck out and move to a different country where the policies are more to your liking. Nobody is stopping you. Same goes for boutons_deux. Instead of whining and bitching about the USA, why not move to somewhere else where you don't have to be a whiny bitch? The U.S.A. will always be a beacon of capitalism, federalism, patriotism, supply-side economics, and minimal handouts. If you don't like that? GTFO and move to another country.

You responded to his false equivalency. The American leftist is the most selfish person on the planet.

[ChumpDumper]

You responded to his false equivalency. The American leftist is the most selfish person on the planet.Were you the most selfish person on the planet when you supported Bernie?

[vy65]

Wrong

You can't say any more because you can't back this retarded claim up.

[vy65]

lol according to Tholdren, the USFG has nationalized Twitter. Must have missed that one ...

[Will Hunting]

https://www.washingtonian.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/MG_4688.jpg
:lmao

[ElNono]

Executive order to enforce a private company to cease business operations within the USA is absolutely 100% within the authority guidelines of a U.S. President as per the Constitution.

Nothing to see or complain about here.

Not really, no. I mean, he's going to court, and have a lot of explaining to do. This isn't a monarchy.

[ElNono]

OANN has gorgeous, model-beautiful, millennial women.

MSNBC has fat, ugly, androgynous bull dyke hipster-y cunts.

#LeftWingJealousy

Don't watch MSNBC, I'll take your word for it.

[ElNono]

https://twitter.com/HawleyMO/status/1265737658082430977

Sounds like he's upset. He should introduce that legislation, see how it works out.

[ElNono]

Had these "fact checkers" been in place 4 years ago would you stupid fucks still have fallen for Russiagate? :lmao

How about Pizzagate?

[tholdren]

all these posts all these posts!

[Millennial_Messiah]

Not really, no. I mean, he's going to court, and have a lot of explaining to do. This isn't a monarchy.

:lol in 2025 if they even threaten to do anything to him he has waaaaaaayyyyy enough money to permanently leave the country and pay people there the necessary hush money to keep him safe.

[ElNono]

:lol in 2025 if they even threaten to do anything to him he has waaaaaaayyyyy enough money to permanently leave the country and pay people there the necessary hush money to keep him safe.

No, I mean if he tries to do anything as a POTUS right now. We're talking about his capacity as a POTUS, that's what you brought up.

[tholdren]

No, I mean if he tries to do anything as a POTUS right now. We're talking about his capacity as a POTUS, that's what you brought up.
Posting now

[DMC]

yawn

[Nathan89]

Had these "fact checkers" been in place 4 years ago would you stupid fucks still have fallen for Russiagate? :lmao

They would have added the conspiracy to comments that disagreed. That's how this new "fact checking" thing works.

[Reck]

1265770043943649281

:lmao Seething mad.

Cant do shit.

[LkrFan]

How'd I miss this?
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1265255845358645254?s=19

Fact checked :rollin :lmao :rollin

[boutons_deux]

Tantruming Trump To Issue An Executive Order Against Twitter

The White House has announced that Trump will sign an executive order on social media,

even though executive orders have no power over social media. :lol

https://www.politicususa.com/2020/05/27/tantruming-trump-to-issue-an-executive-order-against-twitter.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+politicususa%2FfJAl+%28Politi cus+USA+%29 (https://www.politicususa.com/2020/05/27/tantruming-trump-to-issue-an-executive-order-against-twitter.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+politicususa%2FfJAl+%28Politi cus+USA+%29)

[ducks]

Fact check by cnn lol talk about bias fact check

Nadler in 2004 said mail in ballots easy to have fraud
Loosing 16 millions ballots in mail last 4 years is fraud!

Why no link to that in fact checkers by cnn?

[TSA]

How about Pizzagate?

Are you seriously trying to compare that to the biggest debunked conspiracy theory our country has ever seen that was pushed by the MSM 24/7 for 3+ years? :lmao Those same people that pushed this conspiracy theory are now the people we look to as “fact checkers”? :rollin

[Reck]

Are you seriously trying to compare that to the biggest debunked conspiracy theory our country has ever seen that was pushed by the MSM 24/7 for 3+ years? :lmao Those same people that pushed this conspiracy theory are now the people we look to as “fact checkers”? :rollin

People went to jail for that. lol @ conspiracy.

[TSA]

People went to jail for that. lol @ conspiracy.

Americans went to jail for conspiring with Russia...can I get a fact checker in here :lmao

[Reck]

TSA carrying water for Trump at this stage in the game. Ouch

[Blake]

TSA carrying water for Trump at this stage in the game. Ouch

Lol at the forevertrumpers bashing Twitter here

[TSA]

TSA carrying water for Trump at this stage in the game. Ouch

Believing people went to jail for conspiring with Russia at this stage of the game.
Ouch.

[Blake]

Believing people went to jail for conspiring with Russia at this stage of the game.
Ouch.

Can we get a fact checker in here for pizzagate?

[TSA]

Can we get a fact checker in here for pizzagate?

Another fucking idiot trying to compare it to the biggest debunked conspiracy theory our country has ever seen that was pushed by the MSM 24/7 for 3+ years :lmao

[boutons_deux]

Trash and his mafiya knew and received Pootin's help, then fired Comey and suppressed all investigations of the WH crimes

[Spurminator]

https://twitter.com/LevineJonathan/status/1265457578215124995

"fact checker" :lol

:lol 2 hours late on a tweet Qhris already posted.

:lol following orders

[TSA]

stunning rebuttal

[Reck]

Another fucking idiot trying to compare it to the biggest debunked conspiracy theory our country has ever seen that was pushed by the MSM 24/7 for 3+ years :lmao

You keep saying it was debunked when that investigation netted half a dozen indictments and people actually went to prison for it.

Also "Trump not exonerated."

You are losing your nerve unprovoked calling people all kinds of name for no reason. :lol

[weebo]

The only way forward in the face of leftist authoritarians running social media is for other platforms to emerge. This will accelerate the divide in this country. This is the path to the inevitable division of the US. You people lack foresight.

The country is already divided moron. :lol Just look at this site. Oh and :lmao realDonaldTrump.

[Spurminator]

stunning rebuttal

I already rebutted it when your Trump PR partner posted it

[spurraider21]

Another fucking idiot trying to compare it to the biggest debunked conspiracy theory our country has ever seen that was pushed by the MSM 24/7 for 3+ years :lmao
next time the campaign of the sitting president is under FBI investigation the media should not report on it at all

[TSA]

You keep saying it was debunked when that investigation netted half a dozen indictments and people actually went to prison for it.

Also "Trump not exonerated."

You are losing your nerve unprovoked calling people all kinds of name for no reason. :lol

Not a single person went to jail or prison for anything remotely even considered conspiring with Russia you stupid fuck :lmao

You are a prime example of why fact checkers are pointless...even after having been shown the facts you are still too fucking stupid/ignorant to accept them.

1. "The investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."

2. "The investigation examined whether [contacts between Russia and Trump figures] involved or resulted in coordination or a conspiracy with the Trump Campaign and Russia, including with respect to Russia providing assistance to the Campaign in exchange for any sort of favorable treatment in the future. Based on the available information, the investigation did not establish such coordination."

3. "The investigation did not establish that [Carter] Page coordinated with the Russian government in its efforts to interfere with the 2016 election."

4. "The Office did not identify evidence in those [contacts between Russians and people around Trump after the GOP convention] of coordination between the Campaign and the Russian government."

5. "The Office did not identify evidence of a connection between Manafort's sharing polling data and Russia's interference in the election ... [and] the investigation did not establish that Manafort otherwise coordinated with the Russian government on its election-interference efforts."

6. "The investigation did not establish that these [contacts between Russians and people around Trump during the transition] reflected or constituted coordination between the Trump Campaign and Russia in its election interference activities."

7. "The investigation did not identify evidence that any U.S. persons conspired or coordinated with the [Russian disinformation campaign]."

[TSA]

next time the campaign of the sitting president is under FBI investigation the media should not report on it at all

They all had the Page FISA app, they all had the Steele dossier, they all knew it was bullshit.
Calling that contrived shit leaking from FBI/DOJ “reporting” :lol

[boutons_deux]

evil FB will not factcheck Trash and similar ilk, contributing to the degradation of USA, for profit

[Reck]

:lol TSA copy pastas.

If you're going to argue something, maybe use your own words. You're using someone else's talking points, faggot.

For example, it only took me one google search to find this.

https://www.axios.com/trump-associates-convicted-mueller-investigations-206295a1-5abc-4573-be25-4da19d9adcc9.html

:lol Papadoulos
:lol Richard Pinedos
:lol Alex Van der Zwaan


But no one went to prison!

[weebo]

Don't you right wing bleeding vaginas ever get tired of defending the orange jack off? :lol

[ChumpDumper]

How about Pizzagate?Don't forget TSA went all in on QAnon as well.

[TSA]

:lol TSA copy pastas.

If you're going to argue something, maybe use your own words. You're using someone else's talking points, faggot.

For example, it only took me one google search to find this.

https://www.axios.com/trump-associates-convicted-mueller-investigations-206295a1-5abc-4573-be25-4da19d9adcc9.html

:lol Papadoulos
:lol Richard Pinedos
:lol Alex Van der Zwaan


But no one went to prison!

None of them went to prison for conspiring with Russia you stupid fuck :lmao

And those “talking points” I copy/pasted are from Mueller himself you stupid fuck :lmao

https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf

Forum dunce :lmao

[Reck]

the reason for them being indicted, charge and sentenced is literally listed on there as being involved with Russia which is what you know Mueller was tasked with investigaing. :lol I'm not going to argue with you about facts, retard.

[TSA]

the reason for them being indicted, charge and sentenced is literally listed on there as being involved with Russia which is what you know Mueller was tasked with investigaing. :lol I'm not going to argue with you about facts, retard.


https://www.axios.com/trump-associates-convicted-mueller-investigations-206295a1-5abc-4573-be25-4da19d9adcc9.html

:lol Papadoulos
:lol Richard Pinedos
:lol Alex Van der Zwaan



https://www.axios.com/trump-associates-convicted-mueller-investigations-206295a1-5abc-4573-be25-4da19d9adcc9.html

Former Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos: Convicted of lying to investigators about about Russian contacts. He served 12 days in prison and in October, filed to run for former Rep. Katie Hill's California seat.

Richard Pinedo: The California man was sentenced to six months in prison in Oct. 2018 for selling bank account numbers to Russians who engaged in election interference. He has no known connection to Trump.

Dutch attorney Alex van der Zwaan: Pleaded guilty to lying to federal investigators about his work for law firm Skadden, Arps, Meagher, & Flom LLP and Affiliates in 2012. He was sentenced to 30 days in prison and a $20,000 fine.

Highlighting certain people and then posting a link showing they never went to prison for conspiring with Russia :lmao

You are literally the stupidest person posting on the internet right now :lmao

[ElNono]

Are you seriously trying to compare that to the biggest debunked conspiracy theory our country has ever seen that was pushed by the MSM 24/7 for 3+ years? :lmao Those same people that pushed this conspiracy theory are now the people we look to as “fact checkers”? :rollin

lol that's a some very nervous emoticons to answer a simple question... would fact checkers have helped you with Pizzagate?

[Reck]

TSA going full retard per par.

[ElNono]

They all had the Page FISA app, they all had the Steele dossier, they all knew it was bullshit.
Calling that contrived shit leaking from FBI/DOJ “reporting” :lol

Last I checked Media reported the Mueller findings that there was no collusion too... was that OK for them to report?

[TSA]

lol that's a some very nervous emoticons to answer a simple question... would fact checkers have helped you with Pizzagate?

I never claimed it was true, so no, I didn’t need fact checkers. It’s idiotic to try and compare the two and I’m honestly surprised to see you try and do it.

[TSA]

TSA going full retard per par.

Going full retard is posting a link that directly shits on your own claim, which you just did, and are to stupid to even see.

[ElNono]

I never claimed it was true, so no, I didn’t need fact checkers. It’s idiotic to try and compare the two and I’m honestly surprised to see you try and do it.

:lol You never claimed it was true? So why did you have to admit being wrong about it?

Fact checking is fact checking. I don't know why you're upset, tbh

[Joseph Kony]

:lmao this is literally the executive attempting to violate the first amendment and the usual derptards are lapping it up. you people arent patriots. you're all soft as shit bootlicking faggots

[ElNono]

You know what I think? Fact checking wouldn't have done anything for you on Pizzagate, coz you were all emotionally invested in it. It happens.

[TSA]

:lol You never claimed it was true? So why did you have to admit being wrong about it?

Fact checking is fact checking. I don't know why you're upset, tbh

I made a bet with Mono that had a specific timeline and I’m a man of my word. I’m not a faggot welcher like Reck and djohn.

[Nathan89]

The country is already divided moron. :lol Just look at this site. Oh and :lmao realDonaldTrump.

The country has been dividing for awhile. Long before Trump. As you can see from my post I said "accelerate the divide" because the divide already exists. But thanks for your insightful contribution and for calling me a moron.

[Reck]

Going full retard is posting a link that directly shits on your own claim, which you just did, and are to stupid to even see.

Did my link not say they were indicted, charged and sentence and sent to prison or jail because of being involved in Russian election interfering?


Convicted of lying to investigators about Russian contacts. He served 12 days in prison and in October


The California man was sentenced to six months in prison in Oct. 2018 for selling bank account numbers to Russians who engaged in election interference.

:lol

I mean I helped as much as I could. :lol

[Reck]

I made a bet with Mono that had a specific timeline and I’m a man of my word. I’m not a faggot welcher like Reck and djohn.

Another one of your many failures. Pizzagate, QAnon, etc.

[ElNono]

I made a bet with Mono that had a specific timeline and I’m a man of my word. I’m not a faggot welcher like Reck and djohn.

If you peddled it, and you did, I'm sure you thought there was merit to it. I tried to tell you back then, but c'est la vie.

Anyways, I don't think fact checkers would've helped you at all. This is pretty much the same. Trumpy is just mad he can't lie outright without getting called out for it.

It's problematic, but here's the good news, he has plenty of other platforms to flock to.

[Reck]

It's problematic, but here's the good news, he has plenty of other platforms to flock to.

Zuckerberg already kissing his ass to go full in on Facebook. So, you're right. He has options.

[Nathan89]

.

[ChumpDumper]

I never claimed it was true:rollin it literally says "wrong about pizzagate" under your name. Of course you believed it was true.

[TSA]

Did my link not say they were indicted, charged and sentence and sent to prison or jail because of being involved in Russian election interfering?
:lol

I mean I helped as much as I could. :lol

No one in your link involved with Trump was sentenced to prison for conspiring with Russia. You are just rolling in your own shit now :lmao

Papadapolous wasn’t charged for anything close to conspiring with Russia, and the “Russian contact” they claimed he lied about was a misremembered date of a conversation with Joseph Mifsud, a western intelligence asset. Nothing in your link says he went to prison for conspiring with Russia, especially not the part you bolded

The second quote from you link you conveniently left off the last sentence :lmao

Richard Pinedo: The California man was sentenced to six months in prison in Oct. 2018 for selling bank account numbers to Russians who engaged in election interference. He has no known connection to Trump.

Did you really think you’d pull off that omission Forum Dunce? :lmao

[ElNono]

Zuckerberg already kissing his ass to go full in on Facebook. So, you're right. He has options.

He doesn't need an executive order for that.

[TSA]

If you peddled it, and you did, I'm sure you thought there was merit to it. I tried to tell you back then, but c'est la vie.

Anyways, I don't think fact checkers would've helped you at all. This is pretty much the same. Trumpy is just mad he can't lie outright without getting called out for it.

It's problematic, but here's the good news, he has plenty of other platforms to flock to.

I still believe Bill fucked underage girls with Epstein, I have no doubt about that.

I tried to tell you all back then there was no merit to Russiagate, but c'est la vie. And I’m positive now fact checkers wouldn’t have helped as evidenced in this thread.

[baseline bum]

I still believe Bill fucked underage girls with Epstein, I have no doubt about that.


Donald too

[Reck]

No one in your link involved with Trump was sentenced to prison for conspiring with Russia. You are just rolling in your own shit now :lmao

Papadapolous wasn’t charged for anything close to conspiring with Russia, and the “Russian contact” they claimed he lied about was a misremembered date of a conversation with Joseph Mifsud, a western intelligence asset. Nothing in your link says he went to prison for conspiring with Russia, especially not the part you bolded

The second quote from you link you conveniently left off the last sentence :lmao

Richard Pinedo: The California man was sentenced to six months in prison in Oct. 2018 for selling bank account numbers to Russians who engaged in election interference. He has no known connection to Trump.

Did you really think you’d pull off that omission Forum Dunce? :lmao

My OP:


People went to jail for that. lol @ conspiracy.

That was adressing your stupid assertion the Mueller investigation was a conspiracy that led to nothing. You are wrong which I went on to show.

But hey, you're also now saying you weren't wrong for putting something below your avatar despite the oposite.

You're on another level of derp retardation.

[ElNono]

I still believe Bill fucked underage girls with Epstein, I have no doubt about that.

I tried to tell you all back then there was no merit to Russiagate, but c'est la vie. And I’m positive now fact checkers wouldn’t have helped as evidenced in this thread.

I never claimed that Russia and Trump's campaign colluded, I simply said we should wait for Mueller's report.

Again, it's easy to jump to conclusions, but actually waiting for facts is the right thing to do in the end.

[ChumpDumper]

I still believe Bill fucked underage girls with Epstein, I have no doubt about that.

I tried to tell you all back then there was no merit to Russiagate, but c'est la vie. And I’m positive now fact checkers wouldn’t have helped as evidenced in this thread.Come on, man. Quit acting like you weren't all in on pizzagate.

The second you found out there wasn't a basement in Comet Ping Pong you immediately said the child sex dungeon was in the basement of a different restaurant the same guys owned.

Then you were all in on QAnon.

Then you were all in on Kim Dotcom.

Then you were all in on Urainium One.

Then you were all in on Siiiiiiiiiiiiiiiilllllllllllllllllllssssssssssssss sssssbbbbbbbbbbbyyyyyyyy.

You believed all of it.

[Reck]

Come on, man. Quit acting like you weren't all in on pizzagate.

The second you found out there wasn't a basement in Comet Ping Pong you immediately said the child sex dungeon was in the basement of a different restaurant the same guys owned.

Then you were all in on QAnon.

Then you were all in on Kim Dotcom.

Then you were all in on Urainium One.

Then you were all in on Siiiiiiiiiiiiiiiilllllllllllllllllllssssssssssssss sssssbbbbbbbbbbbyyyyyyyy.

You believed all of it.

TSA is a conspiracy whore.

Just as long as he gets his momentary fix, he's good until the next and inevitably conspiracy comes along.

[TSA]

My OP:



That was adressing your stupid assertion the Mueller investigation was a conspiracy that led to nothing. You are wrong which I went on to show.

But hey, you're also now saying you weren't wrong for putting something below your avatar despite the oposite.

You're on another level of derp retardation.

You responded to me talking about the Russiagate conspiracy, you know, the conspiracy that involved Trump and his campaign being agents of Russia and conspiring with Wikileaks to release emails stolen by Russia.

You shit all over yourself again you stupid fucking dunce, go clean yourself up and sit in the corner, you’ve embarrassed yourself again.

[Spurtacular]

Twitter isn't the government you downs-syndrome having piece of shit.

They've become a public town square. That comes with duties whether you like it or not, fuck face.

[TSA]

I never claimed that Russia and Trump's campaign colluded, I simply said we should wait for Mueller's report.

Again, it's easy to jump to conclusions, but actually waiting for facts is the right thing to do in the end.

If you never claimed any of that I’m not sure why you are responding to me laughing at Russiagate hoax believers wanting fact checks.

[ChumpDumper]

They've become a public town square.:lol no

[Reck]

You shit all over yourself again you stupid fucking dunce.

That doesn't really reflect on what's going on here in the last few pages. You're literally being laughed by all fronts.

But of course you know this which is why you're losing your shit here.

close the lid.

[Spurtacular]

:lol no

Did I need to list virtual for you to follow, David Dook?

[TSA]

That doesn't really reflect on what's going on here in the last few pages. You're literally being laughed by all fronts.

But of course you know this which is why you're losing your shit here.

close the lid.

:lol fucking Corky

[ElNono]

If you never claimed any of that I’m not sure why you are responding to me laughing at Russiagate hoax believers wanting fact checks.

I only laughed at the notion that you didn't think Pizzagate was true.

[ChumpDumper]

Did I need to list virtual for you to follow, David Dook?No, because it's not that either.:lol

[weebo]

The country has been dividing for awhile. Long before Trump. As you can see from my post I said "accelerate the divide" because the divide already exists. But thanks for your insightful contribution and for calling me a moron.

What's to accelerate moron? :lol The R-wing nut jobs already wish death on the L-wing nut jobs and vice a versa. If anything, you might want to shift blame to Trump and the Trump loyalist party. They poured the gasoline.

[ElNono]

They've become a public town square. That comes with duties whether you like it or not, fuck face.

sorry, you don't become the government because your service is used by a lot of people. Not how it works.

[vy65]

They've become a public town square. That comes with duties whether you like it or not, fuck face.

:lmao

They’re a private company and can whatever the fuck they want. That’s why they have things like a c-suite and stock ticker.

You dying on this hill so your fat retarded cult leader can still tweet the endless diarrhea you lovingly gulp down is sad. Even for you and your extra chromosomes

[Blake]

They've become a public town square. That comes with duties whether you like it or not, fuck face.

:lol what a stupid post :lol

[ducks]

Facebook responds
https://www.foxnews.com/media/facebook-mark-zuckerberg-twitter-fact-checking-trump

[ElNono]

Facebook responds
https://www.foxnews.com/media/facebook-mark-zuckerberg-twitter-fact-checking-trump

respond to a question from Fox?

[Blake]

Facebook responds
https://www.foxnews.com/media/facebook-mark-zuckerberg-twitter-fact-checking-trump

Last I checked, Fox News is a private company too

[Spurtacular]

:lmao

They’re a private company and can whatever the fuck they want. That’s why they have things like a c-suite and stock ticker.

You dying on this hill so your fat retarded cult leader can still tweet the endless diarrhea you lovingly gulp down is sad. Even for you and your extra chromosomes

They operate chiefly in the public domain. That comes with certain responsibilities whether you like it or not.

Sorry, you don't get your lame cop out.

[ChumpDumper]

They operate chiefly in the public domain. That comes with certain responsibilities whether you like it or not.What does any of this mean, according to you?

What is public domain in this case?

What are their specific responsibilities?

[spurraider21]

They all had the Page FISA app, they all had the Steele dossier, they all knew it was bullshit.
Calling that contrived shit leaking from FBI/DOJ “reporting” :lol
right. so media shouldnt report on sitting president's campaign being under special counsel investigation for conspiring with a foreign power to meddle with our election

[ElNono]

They operate chiefly in the public domain. That comes with certain responsibilities whether you like it or not.

Sorry, you don't get your lame cop out.

What does this even means? They would need to be classified as a public utility in order to even be close to that.

[Spurtacular]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pY8xnMXXlqI

[Spurtacular]

:lol The fascist left

[Reck]

Derp gets his talking points from YouTube right wingers. Shocking

[TSA]

right. so media shouldnt report on sitting president's campaign being under special counsel investigation for conspiring with a foreign power to meddle with our election

:lol “reporting”

[ElNono]

:lol “reporting”

Not sure what's so funny about that, tbh... you didn't like the reporting? did you dislike when they reported the Mueller's report findings?

[TSA]

Not sure what's so funny about that, tbh... you didn't like the reporting? did you dislike when they reported the Mueller's report findings?

That wasn’t “reporting”, those were leaks from the FBI/DOJ they knew were false but pushed anyways because orange man bad.

[ElNono]

That wasn’t “reporting”, those were leaks from the FBI/DOJ they knew were false but pushed anyways because orange man bad.

I'm not asking if you agreed with all the reporting, I'm asking if you didn't think a POTUS being formally investigated was newsworthy? I mean, it was with other presidents too.

I don't watch cable news, but media in general nowadays is a mixed bag, but that doesn't really mean they shouldn't report on things that are clearly newsworthy.

You think they shouldn't have reported the Mueller's findings, for example?

[Blake]

That wasn’t “reporting”, those were leaks from the FBI/DOJ they knew were false but pushed anyways because orange man bad.

Lol conspiracy leaks

[ElNono]

I do agree that there's a lot of opinion and chicanery nowadays... that's basically what Twatter is too. Not a fan.

[TSA]

Lol conspiracy leaks

lol that’s exactly what they were thanks for playing

[pgardn]

Our fckn president is a pathological liar.

Tough.
Take your medicine.

[Blake]

lol that’s exactly what they were thanks for playing

Lol sure they were, thanks for the lol

[TSA]

I'm not asking if you agreed with all the reporting, I'm asking if you didn't think a POTUS being formally investigated was newsworthy? I mean, it was with other presidents too.

I don't watch cable news, but media in general nowadays is a mixed bag, but that doesn't really mean they shouldn't report on things that are clearly newsworthy.

You think they shouldn't have reported the Mueller's findings, for example?

Reporting on an investigation into the President and knowingly broadcasting false information in order to damage the President are two different things. The latter happened more often than not concerning the Russia investigation.

[Reck]

:lmao

[ElNono]

Reporting on an investigation into the President and knowingly broadcasting false information in order to damage the President are two different things. The latter happened more often than not concerning the Russia investigation.

So what you're saying is that you agree it should've been reported in the news. You just didn't like how it was largely reported.

[TSA]

So what you're saying is that you agree it should've been reported in the news. You just didn't like how it was largely reported.

I didn’t say that at all. What makes you think that? Be specific and don’t avoid the false information being broadcast to damage the President.

[ElNono]

I didn’t say that at all. What makes you think that? Be specific and don’t avoid the false information being broadcast to damage the President.

Well, you said:

Reporting on an investigation into the President and knowingly broadcasting false information in order to damage the President are two different things. The latter happened more often than not concerning the Russia investigation.

If you say the latter happened more often than not, then that implicitly mean these alleged lies weren't the only thing reported, even if they were the majority.

It's clear you didn't like those particular lies, but you think it was newsworthy?

[spurraider21]

:lol “reporting”
Yes. Reporting

[KobesAchilles]

Well it’s nice to know he has his priorities in order. Pandemic going on and I still can’t get tested. Economy is in the toilet. 40 million people are unemployed. But yes let’s focus our attention on twitter and draft an entire executive order that literally can’t do anything since Twitter is privately owned and just by having an account you agree to it’s terms. Dumbass :lol

[ElNono]

I just kinda find the faux outrage at lying sort of hilarious coming from a Trumpfan, tbh...

It doesn't mean it's ok that the Media lies, but your standards a bit iffy to begin with...

[DMC]

Well it’s nice to know he has his priorities in order. Pandemic going on and I still can’t get tested. Economy is in the toilet. 40 million people are unemployed. But yes let’s focus our attention on twitter and draft an entire executive order that literally can’t do anything since Twitter is privately owned and just by having an account you agree to it’s terms. Dumbass :lol

Why do you need to be tested? If you test negative, do you want to be tested again tomorrow? Day after that?

You don't need to be tested unless you meet certain criteria. Otherwise it's just paranoia and we don't have the resources to keep that at bay.

[KobesAchilles]

Why do you need to be tested? If you test negative, do you want to be tested again tomorrow? Day after that?

You don't need to be tested unless you meet certain criteria. Otherwise it's just paranoia and we don't have the resources to keep that at bay.
I take my grandma to dialysis every other day. Would be nice to know that I can’t pass it on to her. Also I work with school children for a living and would be nice to know I could have testing done when the inevitable occurs and a kid in my class has it or has come into contact with a person who does have it.

But you’re damn straight I’m paranoid homie. I was paranoid about all kinds of shit before the Corona, I don’t see the issue with being paranoid about it now. President gets tested every other day. I don’t see why I can’t be.

[Blake]

Why do you need to be tested? If you test negative, do you want to be tested again tomorrow? Day after that?

You don't need to be tested unless you meet certain criteria. Otherwise it's just paranoia and we don't have the resources to keep that at bay.

You should ask Trump those questions on his Twitter page

[DMC]

You should ask Trump those questions on his Twitter page

Another quip from the one nobody asked. There's a reason no one asks you.

[DMC]

I take my grandma to dialysis every other day. Would be nice to know that I can’t pass it on to her. Also I work with school children for a living and would be nice to know I could have testing done when the inevitable occurs and a kid in my class has it or has come into contact with a person who does have it.

But you’re damn straight I’m paranoid homie. I was paranoid about all kinds of shit before the Corona, I don’t see the issue with being paranoid about it now. President gets tested every other day. I don’t see why I can’t be.

If you test positive, you probably already did pass it on to her. If you test negative, are you going to quarantine yourself except for that trip? Otherwise you'll need to be tested daily.

[RandomGuy]

Big Government Republican threatens to regulate business for exercising First Amendment Right to comment on public statements.

[LkrFan]

https://twitter.com/donwinslow/status/1266049844423999488?s=19

SMH

[dbestpro]

Imagine how interesting things would get should the social media giants be declared public utilities. It can also be argued that Twitter has much a monopoly on their social media method as Ma Bell had on landlines when it was broke up. The third and most interesting point is the quantification of money value of a media supporting or trying to derail a candidate. This means that the opinion pieces would have to be looked at as campaign donations and recorded as such. Most of what Fox does would have to be recorded to the the right while CNN and MSNBC would go left. Basically, anytime you insulted a candidate it would have to be recorded as a campaign donation. Facts that are not bent to sway by adverbs would always be allowed, which would actually be the news.

[dbreiden83080]

Good Luck with that idiot..

[koriwhat]

Another quip from the one nobody asked. There's a reason no one asks you.

:tu

[clambake]

Another quip from the one nobody asked. There's a reason no one asks you.

And there’s a reason you are a cheap fat fuck. Self-inflicted.

[TSA]

https://mobile.twitter.com/dnvolz/status/1265490148613066753
:lmao

[lefty]

What are his burner accounts?

:lol Duranald Trump

[Spurminator]

https://mobile.twitter.com/dnvolz/status/1265490148613066753
:lmao

Oh man, that's hilarious, the inclusion of Nebraska definitely renders the entire exercise obsolete. I can see why you're so giddy about this stunning revelation. You must be a hit at parties.

[TSA]

https://mobile.twitter.com/dnvolz/status/1265490148613066753
:lmao

On the same day Twitter fact checked :lmao

West Virginia mail carrier charged with attempted absentee ballot application fraud

https://www.whsv.com/content/news/Pendleton-County-mail-carrier-charged-with-altering-absentee-ballot-requests-570777221.html

[TSA]

The executive order takes great pains to avoid some obvious constitutional concerns around the White House's ability to dictate how private companies should deal with speech espoused by their users, but it could still run into a range of legal challenges. The White House broadly argues that the top social media platforms should be treated as "public squares" within which speech is protected by the First Amendment, while the tech industry has argued that the law enables private companies to make choices about how they treat content on their platforms.

As written, one section of the order would require the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, a small agency within the Department of Commerce, to file a petition asking the FCC to review Section 230, tech's prized liability shield. The section heavily implies that online platforms could be considered publishers of content under certain circumstances — and therefore could be held directly responsible for the content they host, a nightmare for any social media platform fearing a slew of lawsuits over every moderation decision.

Another section would forward complaints of anti-conservative bias filed with the White House over to the FTC, where they could be reviewed as examples of "unfair or deceptive business practices" — technically one of the FTC's central mandates.

The draft order would also ask the U.S. attorney general to establish a working group "regarding the potential enforcement of State statutes that prohibit online platforms from engaging in unfair and deceptive acts and practices." It would invite the country's state attorneys general — nearly all of whom are already involved in antitrust lawsuits against Facebook, Google or both — to participate in the consultation.

In one section aimed directly at the companies' bottom lines, the draft order would encourage federal agencies to pull back their ad spending from platforms like Facebook and Twitter if it's found the platforms have imposed "viewpoint-based speech restrictions." Federal agencies spent about $1.5 billion on advertising and PR over the last 10 years, according to a recent government report. A significant amount of that money goes toward public service advertisements — for instance, this year, the U.S. Census announced a $500 million public education and outreach campaign featuring more than 1,000 advertisements.

https://www.protocol.com/amp/donald-trump-twitter-executive-order-2646112240?__twitter_impression=true

[ElNono]

Appeals court ruling suggests little legal traction for Trump's anti-Twitter campaign

A ruling that emerged from a powerful federal appeals court in Washington on Wednesday morning is strong evidence that the courts are unlikely to be receptive to President Donald Trump’s claims that he and his political supporters are being silenced by social media platforms like Twitter.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit resoundingly rejected a lawsuit the conservative legal organization Freedom Watch and right-wing provocateur Laura Loomer filed in 2018 against four major technology companies: Google, Facebook, Twitter and Apple.

Facebook, Twitter and other platforms have banned Loomer, citing anti-Muslim statements.

The unanimous court decision (https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000172-56e7-dc3e-aff6-5eff48dc0000) from a three-judge panel runs to only four pages, but is dismissive of a wide range of legal claims some conservatives and liberals have leveled at social media firms in recent months.

The appeals court judges said that, despite the companies’ power, they cannot violate the First Amendment because it regulates only governments, not the private sector.

“Freedom Watch’s First Amendment claim fails because it does not adequately allege that the Platforms can violate the First Amendment. In general, the First Amendment ‘prohibits only governmental abridgment of speech,'” the court said.

“Freedom Watch contends that, because the Platforms provide an important forum for speech, they are engaged in state action. But … ‘a private entity who provides a forum for speech is not transformed by that fact alone into a state actor.’ ... Freedom Watch fails to point to additional facts indicating that these Platforms are engaged in state action and thus fails to state a viable First Amendment claim,” the judges added.

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/05/27/trump-twitter-court-ruling-284632

[benefactor]

Yeah...this isn't going anywhere.

[DMC]

And there’s a reason you are a cheap fat fuck. Self-inflicted.

That bet really fucked you up :lol

[ChumpDumper]

On the same day Twitter fact checked :lmao

West Virginia mail carrier charged with attempted absentee ballot application fraud

https://www.whsv.com/content/news/Pendleton-County-mail-carrier-charged-with-altering-absentee-ballot-requests-570777221.htmlYour argument against mail in balloting is that someone was caught trying to change party affiliation on ballot requests from Democrat to Republican during a routine verification?

:lol

[tholdren]

Appeals court ruling suggests little legal traction for Trump's anti-Twitter campaign

A ruling that emerged from a powerful federal appeals court in Washington on Wednesday morning is strong evidence that the courts are unlikely to be receptive to President Donald Trump’s claims that he and his political supporters are being silenced by social media platforms like Twitter.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit resoundingly rejected a lawsuit the conservative legal organization Freedom Watch and right-wing provocateur Laura Loomer filed in 2018 against four major technology companies: Google, Facebook, Twitter and Apple.

Facebook, Twitter and other platforms have banned Loomer, citing anti-Muslim statements.

The unanimous court decision (https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000172-56e7-dc3e-aff6-5eff48dc0000) from a three-judge panel runs to only four pages, but is dismissive of a wide range of legal claims some conservatives and liberals have leveled at social media firms in recent months.

The appeals court judges said that, despite the companies’ power, they cannot violate the First Amendment because it regulates only governments, not the private sector.

“Freedom Watch’s First Amendment claim fails because it does not adequately allege that the Platforms can violate the First Amendment. In general, the First Amendment ‘prohibits only governmental abridgment of speech,'” the court said.

“Freedom Watch contends that, because the Platforms provide an important forum for speech, they are engaged in state action. But … ‘a private entity who provides a forum for speech is not transformed by that fact alone into a state actor.’ ... Freedom Watch fails to point to additional facts indicating that these Platforms are engaged in state action and thus fails to state a viable First Amendment claim,” the judges added.

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/05/27/trump-twitter-court-ruling-284632

You will hit 130k !!!!

[DMC]

Appeals court ruling suggests little legal traction for Trump's anti-Twitter campaign

A ruling that emerged from a powerful federal appeals court in Washington on Wednesday morning is strong evidence that the courts are unlikely to be receptive to President Donald Trump’s claims that he and his political supporters are being silenced by social media platforms like Twitter.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit resoundingly rejected a lawsuit the conservative legal organization Freedom Watch and right-wing provocateur Laura Loomer filed in 2018 against four major technology companies: Google, Facebook, Twitter and Apple.

Facebook, Twitter and other platforms have banned Loomer, citing anti-Muslim statements.

The unanimous court decision (https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000172-56e7-dc3e-aff6-5eff48dc0000) from a three-judge panel runs to only four pages, but is dismissive of a wide range of legal claims some conservatives and liberals have leveled at social media firms in recent months.

The appeals court judges said that, despite the companies’ power, they cannot violate the First Amendment because it regulates only governments, not the private sector.

“Freedom Watch’s First Amendment claim fails because it does not adequately allege that the Platforms can violate the First Amendment. In general, the First Amendment ‘prohibits only governmental abridgment of speech,'” the court said.

“Freedom Watch contends that, because the Platforms provide an important forum for speech, they are engaged in state action. But … ‘a private entity who provides a forum for speech is not transformed by that fact alone into a state actor.’ ... Freedom Watch fails to point to additional facts indicating that these Platforms are engaged in state action and thus fails to state a viable First Amendment claim,” the judges added.

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/05/27/trump-twitter-court-ruling-284632

Probably accomplished his goal which was to get people involved in the stock worried.

[clambake]

That bet really fucked you up :lol

It wasn’t a bet. You wanted to post pictures of men you’ll never be, lol

In exchange for $500. Pretty fat and creepy, gravy boat

[boutons_deux]

Yeah...this isn't going anywhere.

Trash is apparently going to say "censor" which is automatically a LIE, to trigger his imbecilic cult mob, who won't, maybe can't, understand the legalities.

[spurraider21]

On the same day Twitter fact checked :lmao

West Virginia mail carrier charged with attempted absentee ballot application fraud

https://www.whsv.com/content/news/Pendleton-County-mail-carrier-charged-with-altering-absentee-ballot-requests-570777221.html
what does that have to do with their fact check? did they say election fraud never happens?

[Blake]

Another quip from the one nobody asked. There's a reason no one asks you.

Not my fault you don't understand how a message board works

[Spurtacular]

https://pics.awwmemes.com/facebook-community-standards-department-~hollie-58569872.png

[ElNono]

https://pics.awwmemes.com/facebook-community-standards-department-~hollie-58569872.png

beggars can't be choosers, tbh... if Zuckerberger promises not to fact check, you gotta take the offer, IMO... election is coming up

[Reck]

Oh man, that's hilarious, the inclusion of Nebraska definitely renders the entire exercise obsolete. I can see why you're so giddy about this stunning revelation. You must be a hit at parties.

Don’t be fooled. Posting laughing emoticons when the situation doesn’t call for it it’s TSA’s way to cope wiry his failures.

[Blake]

On the same day Twitter fact checked :lmao

West Virginia mail carrier charged with attempted absentee ballot application fraud

https://www.whsv.com/content/news/Pendleton-County-mail-carrier-charged-with-altering-absentee-ballot-requests-570777221.html

Remember when you posted links about the possibility of injecting disinfectants?

[RandomGuy]

Yeah...this isn't going anywhere.

Except on Fox "news" to be hashed and rehashed and repeated endlessly as breathless proof of victimhood.

:lol "why can't we lie without consequence"? :cry

[RandomGuy]

On the same day Twitter fact checked :lmao

West Virginia mail carrier charged with attempted absentee ballot application fraud

https://www.whsv.com/content/news/Pendleton-County-mail-carrier-charged-with-altering-absentee-ballot-requests-570777221.html

As the task force investigated, they confirmed that five ballot requests that had been altered from "Democrat" to Republican."
On three other requests, the party was not changed, but the request for an absentee ballot had been altered.



Eight. :rofl

How the Case for Voter Fraud Was Tested — and Utterly Failed
https://www.propublica.org/article/kris-kobach-voter-fraud-kansas-trial

[dbestpro]

Trump's executive order basically means if you censor a post then that is editing and you are liable for all posts. That affects Twitter, Facebook, Youtube, FoxNews, any news source that allows for comments and even this forum if it is monitized in any way.

[boutons_deux]

Pootin and his cyberarmy are hoisting the vodka.

There's no stopping them now.