George Stephanopoulos's Wife Watches Porn With Children

[General Virtue]

Wow, mon.

https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/culture/gabriel-hays/2020/07/19/family-time-mrs-stephanopoulos-watching-porn-kids

These Hollywood Dem Pedophiles. SMH

[Spurtacular]

And these sodomites want us to elect Zombie Rapist.

Pass.

[ElNono]

I'll bite. Three questions:

1) Why are you replying to your own alt?

2) Why are you lying on your own thread?

3) Why do you hate porn?

[TheGreatYacht]

And these sodomites want us to elect Zombie Rapist.

Pass.

https://i.ibb.co/LpnnrNn/FB-IMG-1592329798134.jpg

[Spurtacular]

Why are you lying on your own thread?

Tell us the lie.

[ElNono]

Title: George Stephanopoulos's Wife Watches Porn With Children

Article: “You can’t stop them, so I would watch it with them. I would look at the porn with them that one time, like, ‘They’re performing.’"

[Blake]

https://i.ibb.co/LpnnrNn/FB-IMG-1592329798134.jpg

Uh oh dude, YouTube is up there. What are you going to do?

[SpursforSix]

Uh oh dude, YouTube is up there. What are you going to do?

Good catch. I'm about to trademark Jew Tube.

[SpursforSix]

Good catch. I'm about to trademark Jew Tube.

Damn. Day late, dollar short.

[SpursforSix]

Damn. Day late, dollar short.

"Poo Tube" seems to be available. I'll have to effort to get some content.

[Spurtacular]

Uh oh dude, YouTube is up there. What are you going to do?

You're not edgy, board cuckold.

[Spurtacular]

Title: George Stephanopoulos's Wife Watches Porn With Children

Article: “You can’t stop them, so I would watch it with them. I would look at the porn with them that one time, like, ‘They’re performing.’"

So, what's the lie? Still waiting for that.

[Spurtacular]

TheGreatYacht

In that deleted video, Mag was making fun of this bitch for wearing a scarf and reading from a script as she pretended to be afflicted with COVID.

https://s.abcnews.com/images/GMA/200402_gma_george5_hpMain_16x9_992.jpg

[Trainwreck2100]

corruptive, and addictive medium, which profits off of violent exploitation of women

stop reading there, them dumb bitches get paid

[TheGreatYacht]

TheGreatYacht

In that deleted video, Mag was making fun of this bitch for wearing a scarf and reading from a script as she pretended to be afflicted with COVID.

https://s.abcnews.com/images/GMA/200402_gma_george5_hpMain_16x9_992.jpg

Yeah I watched it on Bitchute. I remember

[Spurtacular]

Yeah I watched it on Bitchute. I remember

The pedo elites want us to be scared.

[ElNono]

So, what's the lie? Still waiting for that.

So, she doesn't watch porn with children...

[Spurtacular]

So, she doesn't watch porn with children...

Are you just trying to be a retard?


Wentworth, who has two daughters with the Good Morning America anchor, claimed, “You can’t stop them, so I would watch it with them. I would look at the porn with them that one time"

[ElNono]

Are you just trying to be a retard?

No, I'm not. Are you?

She's not saying she watches porn with children, she said she would watch porn with her teenage kids one time to let them know that's a performance, not what sex is about. It's called sexual education.

Adults watching porn with children is your fantasy, not hers.

[Spurtacular]

No, I'm not. Are you?

She's not saying she watches porn with children, she said she would watch porn with her teenage kids one time to let them know that's a performance, not what sex is about. It's called sexual education.

She watches porn with minors (children).
Teenagers under 18 are children.
And you can call it sex ed all you want. It's still porn.
You shouldn't be calling accurate statements lies. That makes you the liar.

[Spurtacular]

Adults watching porn with children is your fantasy, not hers.

Shameless projection from a documented liar.

[hater]

Whats d big deal tbqh?

Ive been a fan since 12 years old tbqh :lol

[Spurtacular]

Whats d big deal tbqh?

Ive been a fan since 12 years old tbqh :lol

Did you watch it with your mom?

[hater]

Did you watch it with your mom?

No but she said sex ed purposes. I did watch R movies w my parents and sometimes they would show fucking scenes :lol

Also in latin america they usually show nudity and sex on primerime shows.

None of it is a big deal. I turned out perfectly fine :lol

You sound like an old maid tbqh

[ElNono]

No but she said sex ed purposes. I did watch R movies w my parents and sometimes they would show fucking scenes :lol

Also in latin america they usually show nudity and sex on primerime shows.

None of it is a big deal. I turned out perfectly fine :lol

You sound like an old maid tbqh

:lol teenagers nowadays actually fuck well before they're 18, watching porn starts way earlier, especially since the internet made it widely available.

You have to be some sort of dinosaur or incel not to know these things.



She watches porn with minors (children).
Teenagers under 18 are children.
And you can call it sex ed all you want. It's still porn.
You shouldn't be calling accurate statements lies. That makes you the liar.


Shameless projection from a documented liar.

No she doesn't. She said she would, not that she did. See how that's a lie? You're jumping to conclusions, per par.

And yeah, having that talk with your kids, and explaining that they're watching a performance and not real life is good parenting.

[Spurtacular]

:lol teenagers nowadays actually fuck well before they're 18, watching porn starts way earlier, especially since the internet made it widely available.

You have to be some sort of dinosaur or incel not to know these things.

I'm not debating what age people start having sex, philonono.

[Spurtacular]

No she doesn't. She said she would, not that she did. See how that's a lie? You're jumping to conclusions, per par.

And yeah, having that talk with your kids, and explaining that they're watching a performance and not real life is good parenting.

She's not using the would as in I would but. She's using would as in I have or I did.

Good try, dude.


Wentworth, who has two daughters with the Good Morning America anchor, claimed, “You can’t stop them, so I would watch it with them. I would look at the porn with them that one time, like, ‘They’re performing.’” Oh that’s wonderful. Though Wentworth, a comedian, explained that this was a way in which she could provide context about the practice to her kids. You see, watching it with her kids would allow her to explain how it’s exploitative of the actors in pornographic productions.

[Splits]

She's not using the would as in I would but. She's using would as in I have or I did.


:lmao imagine being this stupid

[ElNono]

I'm not debating what age people start having sex, philonono.

Well, you might as well should, since she specifically was talking about sex ed, and she has two teenage kids.


She's not using the would as in I would but. She's using would as in I have or I did.

Good try, dude.

lol yes she is, and she's using it twice:

You can’t stop them, so I would watch it with them. I would look at the porn with them that one time, like, ‘They’re performing.’”

Otherwise she would've said that she DID watch with his kids and she explained it was a performance.

[Spurtacular]

Well, you might as well should, since she specifically was talking about sex ed, and she has two teenage kids.



lol yes she is, and she's using it twice:

You can’t stop them, so I would watch it with them. I would look at the porn with them that one time, like, ‘They’re performing.’”

Otherwise she would've said that she DID watch with his kids and she explained it was a performance.

Yea, she used it twice in the same manner as I did and then explained how the application worked.

People substitute would for did all the time in speech like this. You're totally fucking trolling.

"You can't stop them so I would watch it with them."

That's exactly how any of us would've said it.

"You can't stop them so I did watch it with them." - No. That's not the arc of conversational methodology.

Geez, you're such a fucking sperm shielder.

[Spurtacular]

I would but

:cry Except there was no but :cry
:cry Just an explanation of the justification :cry

[ElNono]

Yea, she used it twice in the same manner as I did and then explained how the application worked.

People substitute would for did all the time in speech like this. You're totally fucking trolling.

"You can't stop them so I would watch it with them."

That's exactly how any of us would've said it.

"You can't stop them so I did watch it with them." - No. That's not the arc of conversational methodology.

Geez, you're such a fucking sperm shielder.

lmao @ "conversational methodology"

Unless you're a retard you would say "You can't stop them so I watched it with them, one time, and explained it was a performance".

Which, BTW, is absolutely good parenting. So I don't even know why you have to lie about it.

[ElNono]

I would but

:cry Except there was no but :cry
:cry Just an explanation of the justification :cry

lol mad and lashing out

[Spurtacular]

lmao @ "conversational methodology"

It's how people talk about things that have transpired.

You can go to any documentary and find people saying we would do this and we would do that.

We would play baseball from sun up to sundown.

It wouldn't usually be a 'did' in that sentence.

You're willfully ignoring conversational norms.

It's what you do.

[Spurtacular]

Unless you're a retard you would say "You can't stop them so I watched it with them, one time, and explained it was a performance".

Which, BTW, is absolutely good parenting. So I don't even know why you have to lie about it.

It's possibly a dog whistle for other things.

And I don't think you'd find most parents agreeing with your assessment that watching porn with kids is good, tbh.

[ElNono]

It's how people talk about things that have transpired.

You can go to any documentary and find people saying we would do this and we would do that.

We would play baseball from sun up to sundown.

It wouldn't usually be a 'did' in that sentence.

You're willfully ignoring conversational norms.

It's what you do.

:lol why are you doubling down on stupid? You got laughed at by other posters too, it's not just me that sees the ridiculous hill you chose to die on.



It's possibly a dog whistle for other things.

And I don't think you'd find most parents agreeing with your assessment that watching porn with kids is good, tbh.

No, it's not a dog whistle for other things, especially since she was careful to point out 'one time' and explaining why, unless you're a pedo creep.

Also, you don't speak for 'most' parents. Heck, I don't think anybody in here is following neither you gut feelings or taking parenting advice from you. I don't know if you noticed yet, but people call you a weirdo all the time.

And second, who cares what other parents think? It's their kids, they should educate them how they see fit.

[SnakeBoy]

:lol teenagers nowadays actually fuck well before they're 18

lol nowadays

[Spurtacular]

:lol why are you doubling down on stupid? You got laughed at by other posters too, it's not just me that sees the ridiculous hill you chose to die on.

:cry Muh fellow chumpettes laughed at me and saved me. Why you keeping on with this? :cry

[ElNono]

lol nowadays

lol

[ElNono]

:cry Muh fellow chumpettes laughed at me and saved me. Why you keeping on with this? :cry

Ironic. This is the question you should be asking yourself... why die on this hill...

[Spurtacular]

No, it's not a dog whistle for other things, especially since she was careful to point out 'one time' and explaining why, unless you're a pedo creep.



Hard to decipher if "that one time" is a conversational tool or if it's really 'just once'. The way she uses it is somewhat awkward, tbh.

But whether it's once or regularly has not really been at issue.

And sure the potential for dog whistling is absolutely there. There's a certain portion of the population and a large prevalence among the elites to promote the sexualization of minors.

The question is whether it's appropriate or not to watch porn with children. You seem to be in support of it.

[Spurtacular]

Also, you don't speak for 'most' parents. Heck, I don't think anybody in here is following neither you gut feelings or taking parenting advice from you.

:lol Clutching your pearls about me not speaking for most parents.

I didn't say I speak for them. I relayed my contention that I believe most parents would not be for this. It's a really safe bet, tbh. I wouldn't have a problem putting big money on it.

[Spurtacular]

I don't know if you noticed yet, but people call you a weirdo all the time.

Your repeated appeals to chumpette feelings makes you look really weak.

[Spurtacular]

And second, who cares what other parents think? It's their kids, they should educate them how they see fit.

It's a barometer. We make all kinds of societal constructs based on what "parents think". If we didn't, the age of consent would certainly be much lower.

[ElNono]

Hard to decipher if "that one time" is a conversational tool or if it's really 'just once'. The way she uses it is somewhat awkward, tbh.

:lmao:lmao:lmao


The question is whether it's appropriate or not to watch porn with children. You seem to be in support of it.

I don't think it's appropriate to do so all the time, that's creepy weird. I do think it's valid, if a parent chooses to do so, to have one session where they go over it, watch and talk about it.

It's not complicated, these conversation happen anyways when a parent catches their children watching porn, or when some movie goes into an explicit sex scene, and you get det awkward moment.

Just like parents used to take their male kids to a whorehouse to get 'initiated' back in the day.

I support sex education. I think porn sends the wrong message when it comes to education, and I think it's important that kids understand that's not what real sex looks like.

[ElNono]

:lol Clutching your pearls about me not speaking for most parents.

I didn't say I speak for them. I relayed my contention that I believe most parents would not be for this. It's a really safe bet, tbh. I wouldn't have a problem putting big money on it.


Your repeated appeals to chumpette feelings makes you look really weak.

I think your opinion is wrong, at least when it comes to "one time" for sex-ed. As a matter of fact, I think that happens a lot, even inadvertently, when a parent and a teenage son/daughter are watching a movie with explicit content.

And I'm not appealing to anything, I'm pointing out the fact that as much as you want to make this about me, and what 'I' think or what 'I' support, it's actually you standing alone in that hill.

[Spurtacular]

:lmao:lmao:lmao

It is what it is. Once or ten times; I don't see how it matters. The damage is done.

[Spurtacular]

I don't think it's appropriate to do so all the time, that's creepy weird. I do think it's valid, if a parent chooses to do so, to have one session where they go over it, watch and talk about it.

It's not complicated, these conversation happen anyways when a parent catches their children watching porn, or when some movie goes into an explicit sex scene, and you get det awkward moment.

Just like parents used to take their male kids to a whorehouse to get 'initiated' back in the day.

I support sex education. I think porn sends the wrong message when it comes to education, and I think it's important that kids understand that's not what real sex looks like.

No, that's creepy dude.

:lol @ it being under the guise of sex ed. That's a dog whistle.

And the parents doing the whorehouse initiations are creepy AF too, tbh. :lol

[Winehole23]

dude, let it go

[pgardn]

No, that's creepy dude.

:lol @ it being under the guise of sex ed. That's a dog whistle.

And the parents doing the whorehouse initiations are creepy AF too, tbh. :lol

You really have problems Incel boy.
Thank God you won’t join in reproduction.

[ElNono]

No, that's creepy dude.

:lol @ it being under the guise of sex ed. That's a dog whistle.

And the parents doing the whorehouse initiations are creepy AF too, tbh. :lol

The whorehouse thing is very, very old school. I don't know it still goes on, but it was super common back in the day (well, except if you're a mormon, I guess, then you kept in the family). Talk about hands-on education.

You're really going to say you never had that awkward moment with your parents when you're watching a movie and there's a sex scene and you want to hit the FWD button?

Did your folks talk to you about sex at all? If not, sorry to hear that.

[Spurtacular]

The whorehouse thing is very, very old school. I don't know it still goes on

Sure it does. A lot of them end up on the Jerry Springer show.

[ElNono]

Sure it does. A lot of them end up on the Jerry Springer show.

I'll take your word for it.

[ChumpDumper]

Trump wishes known sex trafficker well and derp gets triggered by woman who was on In Living Color 20 years ago....

[DAF86]

lol yes she is, and she's using it twice:

You can’t stop them, so I would watch it with them. I would look at the porn with them that one time, like, ‘They’re performing.’”

Otherwise she would've said that she DID watch with his kids and she explained it was a performance.

I'm not saying this is the usage this woman intended here (impossible to tell with that extremely poor written article) but the use of the modal verb "would" as "past habitual" is very common, tbh.


We also use “would” in everyday speech to talk about repeated actions in the past. This usage is called “past habitual.” Here’s an example:

When I was little, I would play hopscotch with my friends.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/learningenglish.voanews.com/amp/the-many-uses-of-would-in-everyday-speech/4455867.html

[ElNono]

I'm not saying this is the usage this woman intended here (impossible to tell with that extremely poor written article) but the use of the modal verb "would" as "past habitual" is very common, tbh.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/learningenglish.voanews.com/amp/the-many-uses-of-would-in-everyday-speech/4455867.html

As pointed out in that link, the proper use of past habitual entails stating the time period in the first part of the sentence. Which is not the case here.

For that sentence to be past habitual, it would need to read like "Whenever they watch, I would watch it with them", or "Last year they watched, so I would watch it with them".

We also use 'would' all the time to point to things we would've done but did not. After all, it's the past of will.

ie: "I wish I would have done that in Y way".

More than a shitty answer, I think it's missing the question (I don't care to dig deeper, but anybody that does, feel free). The context of the sentence leads one to believe she was asked how she deals with her teenage kids watching porn.

[DMC]

Good catch. I'm about to trademark Jew Tube.

Yourtube... self porn

[SpursforSix]

Yourtube... self porn

that doesn't even rhyme

[DMC]

that doesn't even rhyme

Yourtube, bring lube

[Spurtacular]

As pointed out in that link, the proper use of past habitual entails stating the time period in the first part of the sentence.

I don't think that's a hard fast grammatical rule whatsoever. But the time period of the past is well implied there all the same.
This shouldn't even be a debate. This is how people talk. You're way to desperate to sperm shield.


“You can’t stop them, so I would watch it with them.

[hater]

Weird hill to die on tbqh

So imploring that theres some kind of incest/child sex abuse in a family due to a comment. Weird shit tbqh

[ChumpDumper]

Trump on accused sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell: "I wish her well."

derp:_____________________________________________ _______

[ElNono]

I don't think that's a hard fast grammatical rule whatsoever. But the time period of the past is well implied there all the same.
This shouldn't even be a debate. This is how people talk. You're way to desperate to sperm shield.

How is the past time period implied?

And I didn't make up the rules, it's right there on the link DAF provided:
There are two rules for this usage. The first is that we must state the time period in the first part of the sentence -- “When I was little” for example. Second, we only use “would” this way with action verbs, such as “play” in the hopscotch example. We do not use it with stative verbs, such as: live, be, know, think, understand or want.

[ElNono]

Weird hill to die on tbqh

So imploring that theres some kind of incest/child sex abuse in a family due to a comment. Weird shit tbqh

SHE WATCHES PORN WITH BABIES BEFORE SHE EATS THEM!

[Spurtacular]

How is the past time period implied?

And I didn't make up the rules, it's right there on the link DAF provided:
There are two rules for this usage. The first is that we must state the time period in the first part of the sentence -- “When I was little” for example. Second, we only use “would” this way with action verbs, such as “play” in the hopscotch example. We do not use it with stative verbs, such as: live, be, know, think, understand or want.

The time period was implied; and she wasn't going to whatever site you're going on and looking for a rule that counters how people talk anyways.
DAF86 is right. Her meaning is readily apparent.

Don't worry; you're not the only sperm shielder to make this argument.

[ElNono]

The time period was implied; and she wasn't going to whatever site you're going on and looking for a rule that counters how people talk anyways.
DAF86 is right. Her meaning is readily apparent.

Don't worry; you're not the only sperm shielder to make this argument.

:lol I didn't go to any site, the link is from DAF86's own post, so if he's right, then that means you're wrong.

Furthermore, lol @ "the time period is implied". Only in your head this phrase: "You can’t stop them, so I would watch it with them." implies any time period.

That's not how it works derp. Like hater said, strange hill to die on.

[ChumpDumper]

The time period was implied:lol

[Spurtacular]

:lol I didn't go to any site, the link is from DAF86 (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=11102)'s own post, so if he's right, then that means you're wrong.

Furthermore, lol @ "the time period is implied". Only in your head this phrase: "You can’t stop them, so I would watch it with them." implies any time period.

That's not how it works derp. Like hater said, strange hill to die on.

The time period is the past. Just because whoever didn't write an air-tight synapses doesn't make your contention not retarded.

[ElNono]

The time period is the past. Just because whoever didn't write an air-tight synapses doesn't make your contention not retarded.

lmao, it's an actual quote. Because you keep trying to make shit up it doesn't make it any less of a quote.

[ChumpDumper]

The time period is the past.You inferred.

How long do you want to argue about this?

[Spurtacular]

lmao, it's an actual quote. Because you keep trying to make shit up it doesn't make it any less of a quote.

It's one person's explanation.

Your explanation of her use of the word doesn't even make a lick of sense.

[ElNono]

It's one person's explanation.

Your explanation of her use of the word doesn't even make a lick of sense.

No, it's not an 'explanation'. It's an actual quote.

I'm done here, I don't care if you understand or not, I'm fairly confident anybody else reading this thread have plenty to draw their own conclusions.