PDA

View Full Version : The corrupt left is changing the dictionary to smear ACB



Nathan89
10-14-2020, 05:08 PM
https://twitter.com/SteveKrak/status/1316223349719216128?s=20

https://twitter.com/stillgray/status/1316494833192587264?s=20

The cultural power of the corrupt modern left is too significant. It's unfortunate most of America isn't aware of what they are up against.

RandomGuy
10-14-2020, 05:10 PM
oh look another thread telling us all about what Nathan read about "the left". DUN DUN DUN!!

Nathan89
10-14-2020, 05:11 PM
Yes, another thread pointing out reality.

RandomGuy
10-14-2020, 05:13 PM
Yes, another thread pointing out reality.

another thread reading you whining like a titty-baby about how persecuted you are. :cry

cry harder.

boutons_deux
10-14-2020, 05:15 PM
ACB is a hired shill for the billionaires who financed her, along with Gorsuch and Kavanaugh

RandomGuy
10-14-2020, 05:16 PM
shit, that is about what *I* expect from the right.

About the time you set aside any annoyance, and try to have an honest, good faith discussion, they shit on that, and go back to blathering about some bit or other they saw on twitter.

Any time you get challenged in your bullshit threads by a rational thought, or honest skepticism, you cry conspiracy.

It's predictable.

spurraider21
10-14-2020, 05:23 PM
i'll say this whole "sexual preference" outcry is pretty dumb

Nathan89
10-14-2020, 05:28 PM
oh look another thread telling us all about what Nathan read about "the left". DUN DUN DUN!!

How do consider this a legitimate response to evidence of changing dictionary definitions and videos of Democrat senator using that nonsense to smear ACB?

RD2191
10-14-2020, 05:32 PM
:music

Spurminator
10-14-2020, 06:14 PM
Stupid, yes.

Corrupt? :lmao Trumptard

benefactor
10-14-2020, 06:14 PM
https://i.gifer.com/5uMZ.gifhttps://i.gifer.com/5uMZ.gif
https://i.gifer.com/5uMZ.gifhttps://i.gifer.com/5uMZ.gif
https://i.gifer.com/5uMZ.gifhttps://i.gifer.com/5uMZ.gif
https://i.gifer.com/5uMZ.gifhttps://i.gifer.com/5uMZ.gif
https://i.gifer.com/5uMZ.gifhttps://i.gifer.com/5uMZ.gif
https://i.gifer.com/5uMZ.gifhttps://i.gifer.com/5uMZ.gif
https://i.gifer.com/5uMZ.gifhttps://i.gifer.com/5uMZ.gif
https://i.gifer.com/5uMZ.gifhttps://i.gifer.com/5uMZ.gif
https://i.gifer.com/5uMZ.gifhttps://i.gifer.com/5uMZ.gif
https://i.gifer.com/5uMZ.gifhttps://i.gifer.com/5uMZ.gif
https://i.gifer.com/5uMZ.gifhttps://i.gifer.com/5uMZ.gif
https://i.gifer.com/5uMZ.gifhttps://i.gifer.com/5uMZ.gif
https://i.gifer.com/5uMZ.gifhttps://i.gifer.com/5uMZ.gif
https://i.gifer.com/5uMZ.gifhttps://i.gifer.com/5uMZ.gif
https://i.gifer.com/5uMZ.gifhttps://i.gifer.com/5uMZ.gif

Trainwreck2100
10-14-2020, 09:40 PM
https://thumbs.gfycat.com/FlimsyAchingAxolotl-small.gif

hurts us alot more than them, this bitch gonna fuck the country for the next 30+ years

Will Hunting
10-14-2020, 09:45 PM
hurts us alot more than them, this bitch gonna fuck the country for the next 30+ years
That hurts them plenty too, they’re just too retarded to see it because votingrepublican.jpg

Trainwreck2100
10-14-2020, 09:49 PM
That hurts them plenty too, they’re just too retarded to see it because votingrepublican.jpg

Worth it for them to own the gays by fucking up their marriage though

Will Hunting
10-14-2020, 09:54 PM
Worth it for them to own the gays by fucking up their marriage though
Roe v Wade might be fucked, but I don’t see them reversing on gay marriage even with COVID Barrett. The religious right has largely given up on the gay marriage issue, Roberts/Kavanaugh/Gorsuch aren’t going to reverse that. Those three are all about ruling in favor of liberals on wedge issues so they can build credibility as impartial judges for when they issue rulings that fuck poor people over.

Trainwreck2100
10-14-2020, 09:56 PM
Roe v Wade might be fucked, but I don’t see them reversing on gay marriage even with COVID Barrett. The religious right has largely given up on the gay marriage issue, Roberts/Kavanaugh/Gorsuch aren’t going to reverse that. Those three are all about ruling in favor of liberals on wedge issues so they can build credibility as impartial judges for when they issue rulings that fuck poor people over.

I just can't see roe v wade getting overturned because then they're out of dog whistles for the evangelicals and catholic mexicans.

Will Hunting
10-14-2020, 10:02 PM
I just can't see roe v wade getting overturned because then they're out of dog whistles for the evangelicals and catholic mexicans.
Yeah if I had to bet on it I’d say your right, but Thomas/Alito/Barrett don’t just stop at using it as a dog whistle, they genuinely believe the life at conception bullshit. That’s 3 guaranteed votes to overturn Roe. Imo Roberts is going to do what he did with voting rights, slowly chip away at it over the next 1-2 years until he finally goes for the kill.

ElNono
10-14-2020, 11:02 PM
Roe v Wade might be fucked, but I don’t see them reversing on gay marriage even with COVID Barrett. The religious right has largely given up on the gay marriage issue, Roberts/Kavanaugh/Gorsuch aren’t going to reverse that. Those three are all about ruling in favor of liberals on wedge issues so they can build credibility as impartial judges for when they issue rulings that fuck poor people over.

It's all good no matter how you look at it, IMO. If Roe goes down and Biden doesn't pack the court, then the Democrats will need to implode, which is not a terrible thing longer term.

The GOP is extremely unpopular as it is. Them keep on playing stupid games, means they'll end up with stupid prizes.

Spurtacular
10-14-2020, 11:52 PM
They had to take out the alternative spelling of potato cos Dan Quayle triggered them so badly. :lmao

Chris
10-15-2020, 02:26 AM
Doesn’t really matter for them. Nathan89 (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=20260) is going to live his entire life as an uneducated, poor, miserable piece of shit. If he wants to escape his misery with “at least powerful men who aren’t me can control women in ways that I only fantasize about” then his life is even sadder and more pathetic than any of us can possibly comprehend.

Also I’m not really pro-choice tbh. I don’t think the government should ever use the Bible as the basis for creating laws in this country, because Republicans (and most Christians, like Chris) are hypocritical assholes, but I also feel personally like abortion is mostly immoral and I’m not gonna shed any tears over Roe v Wade being overturned.

It's going to get overturned, and the DNC is going to lose all its money from Planned Parenthood baby murder factories.

ElNono
10-15-2020, 03:19 AM
It's going to get overturned, and the DNC is going to lose all its money from Planned Parenthood baby murder factories.

Sorry this is happening to you

FrostKing
10-15-2020, 03:42 AM
Muh precious gays

RandomGuy
10-15-2020, 10:37 AM
How do consider this a legitimate response to evidence of changing dictionary definitions and videos of Democrat senator using that nonsense to smear ACB?

Libertarians, and right-wingers do not want honest, good faith discussions about topics. They want to tell you what to think, and almost never, ever, examine their underlying assumptions.

Someone told you what to think, then you decided you had an original thought and forgot the fact you were told what to think, then you came in here and post something to pump up your epeen factor.

You are actively lying when you imply here that you want a "legitimate response". You do not give a squirt of shit about a legitimate response, because your only real concern is to pump up your ego by thinking you are "owning the libs".

You lie to me, and, more importantly, you lie to yourself about that.

RandomGuy
10-15-2020, 10:41 AM
Roe v Wade might be fucked, but I don’t see them reversing on gay marriage even with COVID Barrett. The religious right has largely given up on the gay marriage issue, Roberts/Kavanaugh/Gorsuch aren’t going to reverse that. Those three are all about ruling in favor of liberals on wedge issues so they can build credibility as impartial judges for when they issue rulings that fuck poor people over.

No putting the genie back in the bottle on abortion. There is an easy, cheap pill that will do that in a few minutes, without side effects.

Make it illegal in a state, and an underground network will spring up to provide that pill, while women in that state mobilize votes.

Conservatives oppose it until they have to force their teenage daughter to be pregnant for months. Then they look the other way.

Never underestimate the power of conservative hypocrisy.

RandomGuy
10-15-2020, 10:49 AM
How do consider this a legitimate response to evidence of changing dictionary definitions and videos of Democrat senator using that nonsense to smear ACB?

All of that said, I will give you a chance to get a legitimate response, and prove you are telling the truth, all you have to do is simply have a good faith, honest discussion.

Good-faith, honest discussions require direct answers to questions, and the ability to acknowledge when you may not have a strong case or point.

Good-faith, honest discussions require that you may occasionally have to even acknowledge that other people made good points.

Do you want a good-faith, honest discussion, or do you want to tell me some more about what you have been deluded into believing about what I think?

spurraider21
10-15-2020, 10:52 AM
No putting the genie back in the bottle on abortion. There is an easy, cheap pill that will do that in a few minutes, without side effects.

Make it illegal in a state, and an underground network will spring up to provide that pill, while women in that state mobilize votes.

Conservatives oppose it until they have to force their teenage daughter to be pregnant for months. Then they look the other way.

Never underestimate the power of conservative hypocrisy.
an ideal world is one where nobody needs an abortion, imo. but its completely irresponsible to ban them without addressing the demand for them... ie free contraception, more emphasis on proper sex ed

its really, really bad policy thats going to have some disgusting outcomes

Spurminator
10-15-2020, 11:05 AM
ie free contraception, more emphasis on proper sex ed

Pro-lifers oppose those things because it's not really about embryos and fetuses, it's about other people fucking. They see abortion as a result of promiscuity, and they see overturning Roe v. Wade as a way to return to the good old days of "waiting until marriage." Sex ed, contraception, etc. just encourages promiscuity in their eyes.

They resent sexual freedom because they're either celibate (by choice or otherwise) or their stuck going to bed with the same slob or fat cow for the rest of their lives.

Will Hunting
10-15-2020, 11:15 AM
The GOP's focus on filling the courts with Fedsoc judges is one of the most obvious cases of votingrepublican.jpg there is.

Gun rights/abortion/gay marriage are obvious dog whistles used to create a grassroots support for stuffing the courts with federalist society shills even though most Republican senators don't give two fucks about those issues. The real agenda is courts that will trample of over campaign finance reform, voting rights, workers' rights, healthcare and environmental regulations.

:lmao if anyone thinks Charles Koch is pouring millions into "confirm ACB" ads because he likes how she wants to protect the 2nd amendment and overturn Roe.

The fact MAGAtards like Nathan and Chris think Josh Hawley and Ben Sasse are voting to confirm ACB because she's pro-life just shows how laughably stupid they are.

Reck
10-15-2020, 11:17 AM
Muh precious gays

What would you do about them?

boutons_deux
10-15-2020, 11:31 AM
Pro-lifers oppose those things because it's not really about embryos and fetuses, it's about other people fucking. They see abortion as a result of promiscuity, and they see overturning Roe v. Wade as a way to return to the good old days of "waiting until marriage." Sex ed, contraception, etc. just encourages promiscuity in their eyes.

They resent sexual freedom because they're either celibate (by choice or otherwise) or their stuck going to bed with the same slob or fat cow for the rest of their lives.

ACB and other "religious" fringe force-birthers believe that life begins at conception, so in-vitro fertilization (and disposing of unused embryo "people") is in their objectives to criminalize.

"it's about other people fucking"

no, forced-birthers, Biblical misogynists, are about only women fucking and controlling women, since men are never implicated in the fucking and abortion.

RandomGuy
10-15-2020, 05:23 PM
How do consider this a legitimate response to evidence of changing dictionary definitions and videos of Democrat senator using that nonsense to smear ACB?

Still waiting.

I predicted you would not be interested in a legitimate response, but will give you the benefit of another doubt.


All of that said, I will give you a chance to get a legitimate response, and prove you are telling the truth, all you have to do is simply have a good faith, honest discussion.

Good-faith, honest discussions require direct answers to questions, and the ability to acknowledge when you may not have a strong case or point.

Good-faith, honest discussions require that you may occasionally have to even acknowledge that other people made good points.

Do you want a good-faith, honest discussion, or do you want to tell me some more about what you have been deluded into believing about what I think?

RandomGuy
10-15-2020, 05:30 PM
an ideal world is one where nobody needs an abortion, imo. but its completely irresponsible to ban them without addressing the demand for them... ie free contraception, more emphasis on proper sex ed

its really, really bad policy thats going to have some disgusting outcomes

Well, you would simply have a lot of prosecutors simply revolt, and refuse to prosecute anyone, which many are already signing on to.

It would disintegrate into a chaos of lawsuits.

I would point out, that if you really were opposed to abortion, you should be wanting to give all women free contraception, as well as free IUDs like Colorado, which saw its abortion rate plummet.

This is when you would get blowback from the radical evangelicals and catholics, for whom such a move would also be unacceptable. Did I mention conservatives were raging hypocrites?

Nathan89
10-15-2020, 05:53 PM
All of that said, I will give you a chance to get a legitimate response, and prove you are telling the truth, all you have to do is simply have a good faith, honest discussion.

Good-faith, honest discussions require direct answers to questions, and the ability to acknowledge when you may not have a strong case or point.

Good-faith, honest discussions require that you may occasionally have to even acknowledge that other people made good points.

Do you want a good-faith, honest discussion, or do you want to tell me some more about what you have been deluded into believing about what I think?

It doesn't seem like you think your response was legitimate. That's what I'm inferring based on this response. Thanks.

RandomGuy
10-15-2020, 06:10 PM
It doesn't seem like you think your response was legitimate. That's what I'm inferring based on this response. Thanks.

Not really. Hadn't offered up an actual response other than asking you to be honest.

Do you want an honest, good-faith discussion? It isn't a trick question, just a simple one.

DarrinS
10-15-2020, 06:15 PM
What exactly is offensive about the term "sexual preference"?

RandomGuy
10-26-2020, 04:10 PM
Not really. Hadn't offered up an actual response other than asking you to be honest.

Do you want an honest, good-faith discussion? It isn't a trick question, just a simple one.

[crickets]

Guess I got my answer.

Blake
10-26-2020, 04:50 PM
https://twitter.com/SteveKrak/status/1316223349719216128?s=20

https://twitter.com/stillgray/status/1316494833192587264?s=20

The cultural power of the corrupt modern left is too significant. It's unfortunate most of America isn't aware of what they are up against.

What is America up against exactly? As in, what's the downside of this terrifying dictionary change?

Spurtacular
10-26-2020, 04:57 PM
Blake maybe you should get them to change the definitions of cuckold.

Blake
10-26-2020, 05:17 PM
Blake maybe you should get them to change the definitions of cuckold.

It's your rabid obsession, not mine

Spurtacular
10-26-2020, 05:23 PM
It's your rabid obsession, not mine

You've accepted the ramifications of being a lowly cuckold, then?

Good on you.

FrostKing
10-26-2020, 05:26 PM
What exactly is offensive about the term "sexual preference"?
Their angle is homosexuality is not a choice but something you are born with.

tholdren
10-26-2020, 07:39 PM
No putting the genie back in the bottle on abortion. There is an easy, cheap pill that will do that in a few minutes, without side effects.

Make it illegal in a state, and an underground network will spring up to provide that pill, while women in that state mobilize votes.

Conservatives oppose it until they have to force their teenage daughter to be pregnant for months. Then they look the other way.

Never underestimate the power of conservative hypocrisy.

Lololoooookl this guy

Blake
10-26-2020, 07:44 PM
You've accepted the ramifications of being a lowly cuckold, then?

Good on you.

Your reading comprehension is really bad.

Blake
10-26-2020, 07:45 PM
Their angle is homosexuality is not a choice but something you are born with.

FrostKing made the choice to be straight

Spurtacular
10-26-2020, 07:59 PM
Your reading comprehension is really bad.

You haven't accepted the ramifications of being a cuckold?

Blake
10-26-2020, 08:31 PM
Derp just babbling now to shove his humiliations down the page

Nathan89
10-27-2020, 01:29 AM
What is America up against exactly? As in, what's the downside of this terrifying dictionary change?

The change was made recently to smear someone. Not sure how you can't see the problem with that.

ElNono
10-27-2020, 01:30 AM
The change was made recently to smear someone. Not sure how you can't see the problem with that.

Hunter Biden?

FrostKing
10-27-2020, 02:59 AM
Hunter Biden?
Judge Barrett

Blake
10-27-2020, 07:28 AM
The change was made recently to smear someone. Not sure how you can't see the problem with that.

Lol smear who?

RandomGuy
10-27-2020, 09:33 AM
Their angle is homosexuality is not a choice but something you are born with.

(shrugs)

That is the current scientific understanding.

RandomGuy
10-27-2020, 09:33 AM
Judge Barrett

Justice Barrett

Rummpd
10-27-2020, 11:28 AM
Justice Barrett

Good or bad that is whom this lady is.

Nathan89
10-27-2020, 12:03 PM
Lol smear who?

Read the thread title

RandomGuy
10-27-2020, 12:04 PM
Good or bad that is whom this lady is.

Indeed.

Republicans have set the bar for the level of bipartisanship they should expect from a Democrat-controlled Senate. Fuck'em.

RandomGuy
10-27-2020, 12:06 PM
Read the thread title

My question stands unanswered.

I will assume you do not want an honest, good-faith discussion.

Proves my point about the right in this country. It is, at its foundation, dishonest.