The Official Standing Up For The Second Amendment Thread

[Spurtacular]

https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/070/720/766/original/6d0b235004f80ac6.png

[ChumpDumper]

Maybe they have a militia.

[Spurtacular]

Maybe they have a militia.

Maybe Obama armed them.

[ElNono]

ding

[Spurtacular]

ding

Agree. Derp making it about militias was total ding.

[clambake]

Derp pretending he’s not derp is delicious.

[Spurtacular]

Derp pretending he’s not derp is delicious.

Yea. Fucking Derp aka Chump. :lol

[spurraider21]

Agree. Derp making it about militias was total ding.
militias are part of the 2nd amendment

[Spurtacular]

militias are part of the 2nd amendment

So do you think that Americans don't have a right to bear arms unless they are part of a militia?

[ElNono]

Agree. Derp making it about militias was total ding.

you're derp and you're making it about Obama... ding

[spurraider21]

So do you think that Americans don't have a right to bear arms unless they are part of a militia?
no, that's not my opinion nor has it been how SCOTUS has ever interpreted it.

i do think the well-regulated militia clause does grant regulatory power

[Spurtacular]

no, that's not my opinion nor has it been how SCOTUS has ever interpreted it.

Well, that's what sperm shielding Derp is getting at; that it's based on militia rights.

[Spurtacular]

i do think the well-regulated militia clause does grant regulatory power

Why?

[spurraider21]

Well, that's what sperm shielding Derp is getting at; that it's based on militia rights.
it is based on militia rights. the first clause of 2A was not a throwaway line meant to be stylistic

[spurraider21]

Why?
because otherwise the militia isnt well regulated

[Spurtacular]

it is based on militia rights. the first clause of 2A was not a throwaway line meant to be stylistic

Sure, it wasn't. It was meant to state that the people right to self protection via arms.
And it states that this right shall not be infringed. "Regulation" is an infringement.

[Spurtacular]

because otherwise the militia isnt well regulated

That's philo stuff. You can't have a well regulated militia if the right to bare arms is infringed. That's simple stuff. We don't want them being reduced to rocks and sticks.

[spurraider21]

That's philo stuff. You can't have a well regulated militia if the right to bare arms is infringed. That's simple stuff. We don't want them being reduced to rocks and sticks.
if 2A was just meant to say that they cant regulate the private ownership of guns, then it would just say that, instead of leading with the line about a well regulated militia

i dont think the well regulated militia line represented just an optional piece of advice for the people

[Spurtacular]

if 2A was just meant to say that they cant regulate the private ownership of guns, then it would just say that, instead of leading with the line about a well regulated militia

i dont think the well regulated militia line represented just an optional piece of advice for the people

It does say that, quite bluntly. The right SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.

[Spurtacular]

https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/077/533/103/original/99466a5b032cf84f.jpg

[Spurtacular]

https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/078/108/122/original/aeb8d6a6040e3616.jpg

[Spurtacular]

https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/078/638/684/original/350498337799fb01.jpeg

[Frenchfred]

are the people defending the 2nd amendment agreeing with allowing citizens to own nuclear weapons? If not why?

[Thread]

are the people defending the 2nd amendment agreeing with allowing citizens to own nuclear weapons? If not why?

Nazi's!!!

[Spurtacular]

https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/078/929/409/original/8566835ea1b526c2.png

[Spurtacular]

https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/080/671/028/original/eabf6347cd09895d.jpg

[Spurtacular]

https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/083/615/985/original/f3c525c10690122c.jpg

[Spurtacular]

https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/085/957/983/original/ba1a81653db22b6c.jpeg

[Spurtacular]

https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/085/968/382/original/c0d8c81ef846f236.png

[SnakeBoy]

Gun rights advocates are praising a federal court ruling that deemed Los Angeles County's move to close gun stores at the start of the pandemic was unconstitutional.

A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Los Angeles and Ventura counties violated the 2nd Amendment by shutting down gun and ammunition stores in March 2020 arguing that they were nonessential businesses, Fox 11 reported.

"The court today rightfully recognized that Los Angeles County violated Second Amendment rights when it shut down gun stores and ranges in the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic," Michael Jean, NRA's director of the Office of Litigation Counsel, said in a statement. "This is an important decision. It ensures that California -- or any state -- cannot use a crisis to trample on the Constitutional rights of citizens."

In the ruling, Judge Lawrence Van Dyke wrote that the Second Amendment "means nothing if the government can prohibit all persons from acquiring any firearm or ammunition."

[Blake]

Gun rights advocates are praising a federal court ruling that deemed Los Angeles County's move to close gun stores at the start of the pandemic was unconstitutional.

A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Los Angeles and Ventura counties violated the 2nd Amendment by shutting down gun and ammunition stores in March 2020 arguing that they were nonessential businesses, Fox 11 reported.

"The court today rightfully recognized that Los Angeles County violated Second Amendment rights when it shut down gun stores and ranges in the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic," Michael Jean, NRA's director of the Office of Litigation Counsel, said in a statement. "This is an important decision. It ensures that California -- or any state -- cannot use a crisis to trample on the Constitutional rights of citizens."

In the ruling, Judge Lawrence Van Dyke wrote that the Second Amendment "means nothing if the government can prohibit all persons from acquiring any firearm or ammunition."

Lol essential business