Over $1T in COVID federal funds unspent: GAO

[ducks]

The government has run a cumulative deficit of $2.2 trillion so far in 2021
If all not just 50 percent pay takes would not be that
Flat tax best
Fair all would pay the same amount

[ducks]

https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/unspent-covid-federal-funds-gao

[Thread]

Tell it, ducks.

Testify!!!

[ChumpDumper]

The government has run a cumulative deficit of $2.2 trillion so far in 2021
If all not just 50 percent pay takes would not be that
Flat tax best
Fair all would pay the same amountWhy did you shut the fuck up about spending the entire Trump presidency?

[Blake]

Why did you shut the fuck up about spending the entire Trump presidency?

He didn't want to testify

[hater]

Why did you shut the fuck up about spending the entire Trump presidency?

Whataboutmachine

[ChumpDumper]

WhataboutmachineDo you care about spending now or then, hater?

[ducks]

Why did you shut the fuck up about spending the entire Trump presidency?

I wanted a flat tax then
Only fair system I have always wanted it
I also was against extras that democracts thru in with covid bills
Trump signed
Counting fish in Mexico see has nothing to do with covid !

[Chucho]

What happened to "we're going to judge the Biden presidency objectively" group of morally outstanding folk here?

Why do most address Biden-administration issues with the "Whattabout Trump?" rhetoric they loathed when Right-wingers were plying the "Whattabout Obama?" flip side of the coin?

Is ducks, chris, cubby, etc that hard to debate with objectivity and consistency?

[Thread]

What happened to "we're going to judge the Biden presidency objectively" group of morally outstanding folk here?

Why do most address Biden-administration issues with the "Whattabout Trump?" rhetoric they loathed when Right-wingers were plying the "Whattabout Obama?" flip side of the coin?

Is ducks, chris, cubby, etc that hard to debate with objectivity and consistency?

I never said that, Chooch. Once I retur...uh, uh, uh, I mean...I said from the very beginning I was going to resist that mother fucker Biden every day that ended in (y).

[TSA]

What happened to "we're going to judge the Biden presidency objectively" group of morally outstanding folk here?

Why do most address Biden-administration issues with the "Whattabout Trump?" rhetoric they loathed when Right-wingers were plying the "Whattabout Obama?" flip side of the coin?

Is ducks, chris, cubby, etc that hard to debate with objectivity and consistency?


I plan to be about 200 times as critical of Joe Biden as you were of Donald Trump.
:lol

[ChumpDumper]

What happened to "we're going to judge the Biden presidency objectively" group of morally outstanding folk here?

Why do most address Biden-administration issues with the "Whattabout Trump?" rhetoric they loathed when Right-wingers were plying the "Whattabout Obama?" flip side of the coin?

Is ducks, chris, cubby, etc that hard to debate with objectivity and consistency?Now is the time for spending.

Not during the early Trump presidency with tax cuts for the rich too boot.

Objectively speaking.

Sorry your boy Trump was one of the worst presidents in US history.

Objectively.

My question to you is why are we required to pretend Trump never happened?

Be objective in your answer.

[hater]

Now is the time for spending.

Not during the early Trump presidency with tax cuts for the rich too boot.

Objectively speaking.

Sorry your boy Trump was one of the worst presidents in US history.

Objectively.

My question to you is why are we required to pretend Trump never happened?

Be objective in your answer.

Ding *

Ding *

Ding *

[hater]

Now is the time for spending.

Not during the early Trump presidency with tax cuts for the rich too boot.

Objectively speaking.

Sorry your boy Trump was one of the worst presidents in US history.

Objectively.

My question to you is why are we required to pretend Trump never happened?

Be objective in your answer.

Ding *

Ding *

Ding *

[Adam Lambert]

:lol

How cute, you're thinking about me.


I haven't seen enough from Biden where I could give a yes on approval. Certainly it's an improvement over the past four years but that is a low bar. People need to raise expectations. He's not out in front of the country enough. He's not working enough on the fence sitters in Congress to get a Democrat agenda passed.

Even if that was my only critical post of Biden (it's not), that's 1 to your 0 for Trump.

1/0 = Infinity (basically)

Infinity > 200 > 0

:lol shill

[Adam Lambert]

What happened to "we're going to judge the Biden presidency objectively" group of morally outstanding folk here?

Why do most address Biden-administration issues with the "Whattabout Trump?" rhetoric they loathed when Right-wingers were plying the "Whattabout Obama?" flip side of the coin?

Is ducks, chris, cubby, etc that hard to debate with objectivity and consistency?

What exactly is the objectively bad thing we're supposed to be criticizing here? I'm in favor of increased infrastructure spending.

[ChumpDumper]

#StillWithHim

#StillWithHim

#StillWithHim

[hater]

ding *

[ChumpDumper]

The report includes funding implemented during the last administration.

Whose administration was that, hater?

[ducks]

If you bring up past presidents
Then others can bring up current and past presidents

Before covid Trump had things going well
He would have done more had all republicans got on the train in dc to begin with

With covid trump got the shot going faster then any one ever
Even though zinc snd the other drug is more effective and cheaper then the shot but people would not rank in millions so they hated that and would not approve it

[ducks]

If you bring up past presidents
Then others can bring up current and past presidents

Before covid Trump had things going well
He would have done more had all republicans got on the train in dc to begin with

With covid trump got the shot going faster then any one ever
Even though zinc snd the other drug is more effective and cheaper then the shot but people would not rank in millions so they hated that and would not approve it

[Thread]

If you bring up past presidents
Then others can bring up current and past presidents

Before covid Trump had things going well
He would have done more had all republicans got on the train in dc to begin with

With covid trump got the shot going faster then any one ever
Even though zinc snd the other drug is more effective and cheaper then the shot but people would not rank in millions so they hated that and would not approve it

Tell it, ducks.

Testify!!!

[ChumpDumper]

If you bring up past presidents
Then others can bring up current and past presidents

Before covid Trump had things going well
He would have done more had all republicans got on the train in dc to begin with

With covid trump got the shot going faster then any one ever
Even though zinc snd the other drug is more effective and cheaper then the shot but people would not rank in millions so they hated that and would not approve it:lol

Trump was president when COVID hit.

He lost the election because he blew the layup of COVID response that was spelled out for him by previous presidents.

He is a failure.

Biden, the guy who annihilated Trump in the election, could well end up a failure as well. We'll see.

[Thread]

:lol

Trump was president when COVID hit.

He lost the election because he blew the layup of COVID response that was spelled out for him by previous presidents.

He is a failure.

Biden, the guy who annihilated Trump in the election, could well end up a failure as well. We'll see.

Mother fuckeer Biden already has 228k of dead Americans on his side of the COVID Death Ledger in 6 months!!!

Woo Hoo!!!

[ducks]

Biden and the 44 did a much worse job then Trump
The disease was not as deadly
It effectived more then covid

[ChumpDumper]

Biden and the 44 did a much worse job then Trump
The disease was not as deadly
It effectived more then covid:lol what does that even mean?

Half a million were "effectivedly" killed by COVID under Trump.

[ducks]

:lol what does that even mean?

Half a million were "effectivedly" killed by COVID under Trump.

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2020/04/21/obam-a21.html

[ducks]

:lol what does that even mean?

Half a million were "effectivedly" killed by COVID under Trump.

Again covid was more deadly and more Asians and blacks were in America
And with those people their lung system is worse then others.
Not racist just a fact
Those people should get the shot !

[ChumpDumper]

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2020/04/21/obam-a21.html

"The Trump’s administration handling of the preventable pandemic has been reprehensible":tu

Do you agree with this socialist you just cited, ducks?

Yes or no.

[ChumpDumper]

Again covid was more deadly and more Asians and blacks were in America
And with those people their lung system is worse then others.
Not racist just a fact
Those people should get the shot !:lmao Trump almost died from COVID because he's old and really fat.

[Thread]

:lmao Trump almost died from COVID because he's old and really fat.

Boiled down:::

Trump President.
Not Clinton.

[ducks]

:lmao Trump almost died from COVID because he's old and really fat.

You are so full of shit
He was 15 pounds over weight which is typically for that age

[ChumpDumper]

You are so full of shit
He was 15 pounds over weight which is typically for that age:lol his third chin weighs 15 pounds alone.

[ducks]

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2020/04/21/obam-a21.html

Soon after assuming office in 2009, Obama, who had promised an administration guided by science, abolished the Office of Public Health and Emergency Preparedness that had been established by Bush. This left his administration unprepared when the H1N1 virus, or “swine flu,” emerged in the US in April of that year.

[ChumpDumper]

Soon after assuming office in 2009, Obama, who had promised an administration guided by science, abolished the Office of Public Health and Emergency Preparedness that had been established by Bush. This left his administration unprepared when the H1N1 virus, or “swine flu,” emerged in the US in April of that year.So you agree with what the socialist said about Trump?

Yes or no.

[ducks]

:lol his third chin weighs 15 pounds alone.

Your wife’s one butt check weighs 39 pounds

[ChumpDumper]

Your wife’s one butt check weighs 39 poundsWhat's a butt check?

[ducks]

Another global health crisis confronted the world in 2014 when the Ebola outbreak occurred in West Africa. In its review of the outbreak, the WHO called it the “largest and most complex Ebola outbreak since the virus was first discovered in 1976.” The disease quickly spread, and two-and-a-half years after the first case was reported in December 2013, more than 28,600 cases had been confirmed, resulting in 11,325 deaths.

It took Obama’s CDC until July 2014 to activate its Emergency Operations Center in response to the growing outbreak. That same month saw 12 deaths attributed to the virus in Liberia, Sierra Leone and Guinea.

[ducks]

Obama turned to the capitalist market to provide a vaccine. By October of that year, with over 5,000 confirmed deaths, the New York Times reported that researchers had developed a vaccine that was 100 percent effective in protecting monkeys from Ebola. Researchers informed the Times that the vaccine could have been “ready for licensing by 2010 or 2011.”



Yep trump got the vaccine out much faster then any president ever

[ducks]

What's a butt check?

She uses her but cheek to make a check
Duh !

[ChumpDumper]

She uses her but cheek to make a check
Duh !What's a but cheek?

[ElNono]

What happened to "we're going to judge the Biden presidency objectively" group of morally outstanding folk here?

Why do most address Biden-administration issues with the "Whattabout Trump?" rhetoric they loathed when Right-wingers were plying the "Whattabout Obama?" flip side of the coin?

Is ducks, chris, cubby, etc that hard to debate with objectivity and consistency?

Been critical of Old Joe before he was even the Dem candidate, tbh... not sure where this is going.

And one thing doesn't preclude the other. Pointing out how Trumpistas are suddenly fiscal hawks is an actual accurate description of that hypocrisy.

[ducks]

What's a but cheek?

https://www.wordhippo.com/what-is/another-word-for/butt-cheek.html

[ducks]

What's a butt check?

https://66.media.tumblr.com/d57d949f45bf471e00e8da88dcaf447a/tumblr_poirc7nO381u10ou5_540.jpg

[ChumpDumper]

:lol ducks is so clueless

[Chucho]

Now is the time for spending.

Not during the early Trump presidency with tax cuts for the rich too boot.

Objectively speaking.

Sorry your boy Trump was one of the worst presidents in US history.

Objectively.

My question to you is why are we required to pretend Trump never happened?

Be objective in your answer.


Yeah, sorry. I already said I got off the Trump bandwagon long ago, so spare that framing.


Nobody is asking anyone to pretend Trump didn't happen. I'm asking what happened to the objective, vigilant posse that claimed they'd be impartial when judging the current administration.

Objectively, this "forum" doesn't have much, if any opinion on Biden. It's just the same back and forth with the same. Just re-name the forum " about 5 or 6 of the same guys Trump-shaming the same 4-5 guys who are objectively retarded".

If you didn't want to answer the question, just say so.

[Thread]

Yeah, sorry. I already said I got off the Trump bandwagon long ago, so spare that framing.


Nobody is asking anyone to pretend Trump didn't happen. I'm asking what happened to the objective, vigilant posse that claimed they'd be impartial when judging the current administration.

Objectively, this "forum" doesn't have much, if any opinion on Biden. It's just the same back and forth with the same. Just re-name the forum " about 5 or 6 of the same guys Trump-shaming the same 4-5 guys who are objectively retarded".

If you didn't want to answer the question, just say so.

& don't you ever try to hop back on, Chooch. Don't you even dare.

[ChumpDumper]

Yeah, sorry. I already said I got off the Trump bandwagon long ago, so spare that framing.


Nobody is asking anyone to pretend Trump didn't happen. I'm asking what happened to the objective, vigilant posse that claimed they'd be impartial when judging the current administration.

Objectively, this "forum" doesn't have much, if any opinion on Biden. It's just the same back and forth with the same. Just re-name the forum " about 5 or 6 of the same guys Trump-shaming the same 4-5 guys who are objectively retarded".

If you didn't want to answer the question, just say so.You didn't really have a question. It was disingenuous from the start.

Stimulative spending good now.

Not then.

That's my answer.

[Chucho]

What exactly is the objectively bad thing we're supposed to be criticizing here? I'm in favor of increased infrastructure spending.

It's his administration. This form is basically the same Trump-shamers Trump-shaming the same 3-4 retards. There's little to no analysis or discussion about President Biden when President Biden threads are started.

You weren't the only one saying that, to be fair to you.

Just asking, chief.

[Thread]

It's his administration. This form is basically the same Trump-shamers Trump-shaming the same 3-4 retards. There's little to no analysis or discussion about President Biden when President Biden threads are started.

You weren't the only one saying that, to be fair to you.

Just asking, chief.

Look at ya, crawlin', that big old belly draggin', & to that damn Adam no less.

Oh, Chooch, the tears on my pillow bespeak the pain that is in my heart.

[Chucho]

& don't you ever try to hop back on, Chooch. Don't you even dare.

What's there to hop on to, Cubs?

[Chucho]

You didn't really have a question. It was disingenuous from the start.

Stimulative spending good now.

Not then.

That's my answer.

I asked a straight forward question. Now you're telling lies. Good work.

[Adam Lambert]

It's his administration. This form is basically the same Trump-shamers Trump-shaming the same 3-4 retards. There's little to no analysis or discussion about President Biden when President Biden threads are started.

You weren't the only one saying that, to be fair to you.

Just asking, chief.

Well this isn't really the place to look for hard hitting analysis. Some good links get posted here and we have a few people willing to put in the effort to write thoughtful and considerate analysis of current issues, but it's always mostly been a flame war.

I'm just not really sure what part of this latest ducks temper tantrum thread requires thoughtful analysis. Anyone looking for context on why $1T of the approved funds hasn't been spent can find a lot of that in the article.

[ChumpDumper]

Is ducks, chris, cubby, etc that hard to debate with objectivity and consistency?I am doing just that.

They are hypocrites when they say they care about spending when they obviously didn't before.

Objectively speaking.

Do you agree?

Yes or no.

Simple question.

Answer objectively and don't lie.