Conservative SAWM kills his kids for QAnon

[Will Hunting]

https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/12/us/father-kills-children-qanon-california-mexico/index.html

People who believe in QAnon should be oppressed and persecuted as much as possible.

[baseline bum]

If QTards want to kill their kids and remove their gene pool from society, can't say it would be a negative.

[Millennial_Messiah]

If QTards want to kill their kids and remove their gene pool from society, can't say it would be a negative.

He was a teacher in Santa Barbara, California, probably afraid that his kids would grow up to be liberals like what's happening to a lot of white conservative families in CA. A lot of generational divide which means kids pretty much breaking off ties with their parents and other ancestors sort of like what Aaron Rodgers did, except over politics.

Liberals and globalists are evil, but QAnon is becoming a David Koresh / James Jones-town level cult. There's absolutely zero excuse for killing children. This guy should get the death penalty and executed ASAP so he won't waste any taxpayer money in prison.

[Will Hunting]

If QTards want to kill their kids and remove their gene pool from society, can't say it would be a negative.
I liked this post but I've seen some heart breaking videos of kids who's parents got addicted to QAnon and blew their college savings buying survivalist shit, so I'm not sure I'd go that far.

QAnon believers themselves dying/getting murdered is 100% a good thing though and no one will change my mind about that.

[Millennial_Messiah]

I liked this post but I've seen some heart breaking videos of kids who's parents got addicted to QAnon and blew their college savings buying survivalist shit, so I'm not sure I'd go that far.

QAnon believers themselves dying/getting murdered is 100% a good thing though and no one will change my mind about that.

It's time to take QAnon off the internet. What web service is still supporting them? Can't they be taken off the WWW? So then to access QAnon you'd have to use Tor and access the deep or dark web, which is both dangerous and illegal.

[Will Hunting]

He was a teacher in Santa Barbara, California, probably afraid that his kids would grow up to be liberals like what's happening to a lot of white conservative families in CA. A lot of generational divide which means kids pretty much breaking off ties with their parents and other ancestors sort of like what Aaron Rodgers did, except over politics.

Liberals and globalists are evil, but QAnon is becoming a David Koresh / James Jones-town level cult. There's absolutely zero excuse for killing children. This guy should get the death penalty and executed ASAP so he won't waste any taxpayer money in prison.
He was afraid that his kids would grow up to be liberal so he killed them? The way you're trying to explain away someone murdering his own kids in such a perfunctory manner is deranged.

[Will Hunting]

It's time to take QAnon off the internet. What web service is still supporting them? Can't they be taken off the WWW? So then to access QAnon you'd have to use Tor and access the deep or dark web, which is both dangerous and illegal.
I think one of the websites like 8kun still is.

It would really help if your boy Trump would come out and unequivocally say QAnon isn't real and never was real, instead he fueled it by playing footsie with QAnon and purposefully obfuscating whenever journalists would ask him.

[Thread]

I liked this post but I've seen some heart breaking videos of kids who's parents got addicted to QAnon and blew their college savings buying survivalist shit, so I'm not sure I'd go that far.

QAnon believers themselves dying/getting murdered is 100% a good thing though and no one will change my mind about that.

tee, hee.

[Thread]

I think one of the websites like 8kun still is.

It would really help if your boy Trump would come out and unequivocally say QAnon isn't real and never was real, instead he fueled it by playing footsie with QAnon and purposefully obfuscating whenever journalists would ask him.

...he's trying to get under their & your skin, Will. Don't let him, tights.

[Thread]

If QTards want to kill their kids and remove their gene pool from society, can't say it would be a negative.

Bend over. I'll show ya a fuckin' negative.

[Will Hunting]

...he's trying to get under their & your skin, Will. Don't let him, tights.
Bullshit. He and the GOP know they can't win elections if they don't get the QAnon freaks to turn out, so they intentionally play footsie with it and never expressly condemn it. It's the same thing they've been doing with white supremacy the last 40 years.

[Thread]

Bullshit. He and the GOP know they can't win elections if they don't get the QAnon freaks to turn out, so they intentionally play footsie with it and never expressly condemn it. It's the same thing they've been doing with white supremacy the last 40 years.

Let's be fair and all that...mother fucker Biden got into bed with Antifia & BLM and never condemned them an iota.

You've nary room here, Will. The chickens have come home to roost.

[Will Hunting]

Let's be fair and all that...mother fucker Biden got into bed with Antifia & BLM and never condemned them an iota.

You've nary room here, Will. The chickens have come home to roost.
No he's not. Biden expressly condemned ANTIA and the BLM protesters who were violent.

The ANTIFA losers don't even vote; they're anarchists who live at home and they're also a fringe group. There's legitimately 10+ million QAnon believers (you're probably one of them).

[Thread]

No he's not. Biden expressly condemned ANTIA and the BLM protesters who were violent.

The ANTIFA losers don't even vote; they're anarchists who live at home and they're also a fringe group. There's legitimately 10+ million QAnon believers (you're probably one of them).

You're wrong here, Will, and enraged again. I hate when you're like this.

You were happier when the old man was President.

[Reck]

If QTards want to kill their kids and remove their gene pool from society, can't say it would be a negative.

Jesus Christ dude.

The majority of the time it’s only the father or mother who are true believers. The sons and daughters are mostly disgusted by their own parents behavior.

[Thread]

Jesus Christ dude.

The majority of the time it’s only the father or mother who are true believers. The sons and daughters are mostly disgusted by their own parents behavior.

I think the bum is just playing possum, Recky.

[Will Hunting]

You're wrong here, Will, and enraged again. I hate when you're like this.

You were happier when the old man was President.
When did he enrage it? Provide a quote or fold.

[Millennial_Messiah]

No he's not. Biden expressly condemned ANTIA and the BLM protesters who were violent.

The ANTIFA losers don't even vote; they're anarchists who live at home and they're also a fringe group. There's legitimately 10+ million QAnon believers (you're probably one of them).

Biden perhaps. But Kamala, Waters and the squad supported them.


He was afraid that his kids would grow up to be liberal so he killed them? The way you're trying to explain away someone murdering his own kids in such a perfunctory manner is deranged.

I already explained that there's no excuse for killing or harming children, ever. I just was acknowledging that that was probably his deranged mentality. Retarded, I know. But if he actually thought that, the smart play would be to relocate to a more conservative location and/or send your kids to private school, not fucking kill them.


I think one of the websites like 8kun still is.

It would really help if your boy Trump would come out and unequivocally say QAnon isn't real and never was real, instead he fueled it by playing footsie with QAnon and purposefully obfuscating whenever journalists would ask him.

Trump isn't "my boy". He was very far down on my list, possibly even last along with Fiorina, in 2016. I was for Carson and then Rubio and even Cruz over Trump in '16. Would vote for DeSantis in a '24 primary over Trump.


Nope, QTard would have raised his kids as paranoid right wing terrorists, thankfully that got nipped in the bud.

That's just as evil of a statement as anyone from the right who would support the murderer. You're just as bad. :tu

[baseline bum]

I think the bum is just playing possum, Recky.

Nope, QTard would have raised his kids as paranoid right wing terrorists, thankfully that got nipped in the bud.

[LaMarcus Bryant]

He was afraid that his kids would grow up to be liberal so he killed them? The way you're trying to explain away someone murdering his own kids in such a perfunctory manner is deranged.

:lol 99.99% sure by now that MM is the most deranged fucked up lonely weirdo in ST history lol

[Will Hunting]

:lol 99.99% sure by now that MM is the most deranged fucked up lonely weirdo in ST history lol
Na Derp still has him on that front. MM doesn't pull full blown all nighters talking to himself on ST like Derp does.

[Thread]

When did he enrage it? Provide a quote or fold.

No, [you're enraged] is my lament. I hate when you're like this. Now, get it out of your spleen today because tomorrow is Friday and I want to have an old fashioned Friday like we used to.

Savvy, old timer?

[DMC]

Killing kids good now

[Will Hunting]

Killing kids good now
In QAnon world, yes.

[Reck]

In QAnon world, yes.

Huh?

[Trill Clinton]

Conservative+SAWM+ Qtard= no chance for those 2 babies.

[Will Hunting]

Huh?
This thread is about someone killing his kids because he thought it must be done for QAnon, thus in the world of QAnon believers, they think killing kids is good.

Idk what's so hard to comprehend about that.

[Ef-man]

Huh?

In Old Testament, Abraham was ok with killing his son when he heard god tell him to do it. About the same shit.

[Reck]

Good so it’s about time to log off ST for a while.

[Thread]

In Old Testament, Abraham was ok with killing his son when he heard god tell him to do it. About the same shit.

They'll drive ya about to it, by God, Ef.

[Adam Lambert]

Used to be friends with a dude that went off the Qanon rails and damned if I didn't think this thread might've been about him.

[RandomGuy]

He was a teacher in Santa Barbara, California, probably afraid that his kids would grow up to be liberals like what's happening to a lot of white conservative families in CA. A lot of generational divide which means kids pretty much breaking off ties with their parents and other ancestors sort of like what Aaron Rodgers did, except over politics.

Liberals and globalists are evil, but QAnon is becoming a David Koresh / James Jones-town level cult. There's absolutely zero excuse for killing children. This guy should get the death penalty and executed ASAP so he won't waste any taxpayer money in prison.

smh.

You do realize that it costs more money to execute someone than it does to have them live out their lives in prison?

Guessing not.

[RandomGuy]

This thread is about someone killing his kids because he thought it must be done for QAnon, thus in the world of QAnon believers, they think killing kids is good.

Idk what's so hard to comprehend about that.

Religion poisons everything.

This is as close to a religion as it gets, and nutters on the edges that have mental issues are vulnerable to it.

I think we need to face the true costs of conspiracy theories and treat them like the mental cancer it is.

[RandomGuy]

Addressing this kind of rampant, dangerous bullshit is made all the harder by "both sides" stupidity, and the notion that all opinions are created equal.

They aren't.

Very very often on many issues one side or the other has vastly more evidence, and decent arguments for it.

Pretending that is not the case and "both sides" lends fucktarded conspiracy theories like flat earth, human caused climate change denial, and "faked" moon landings seem more credible than the giant steaming idea turds they are.

[koriwhat]

It's so weird to think that most of you harp on those into Qanon yet yall dedicate threads to them and propagate those threads daily. I think the whole Qanon shit is pathetic and dumb as fuck; however, I find it funny how much yall supposedly detest that shit only to propagate it more here on ST. Yall probably talk more about Qanon than the Qturds tbh.

[Millennial_Messiah]

smh.

You do realize that it costs more money to execute someone than it does to have them live out their lives in prison?

Guessing not.
Why? It shouldn't be. One bullet is less than a dollar, and enough power to spark an electric chair shouldn't cost more than a few bucks. A shot of lethal injection shouldn't cost more than $20-25 realistically. Tally up the labor hours of the execution administrators, plus a simple cremation and you're still looking at a $100 bill or less.


Addressing this kind of rampant, dangerous bullshit is made all the harder by "both sides" stupidity, and the notion that all opinions are created equal.

They aren't.

Very very often on many issues one side or the other has vastly more evidence, and decent arguments for it.

Pretending that is not the case and "both sides" lends fucktarded conspiracy theories like flat earth, human caused climate change denial, and "faked" moon landings seem more credible than the giant steaming idea turds they are.
Not all three of those are equal, though. Two of them are proven wrong and the other is still a giant question mark.


It's so weird to think that most of you harp on those into Qanon yet yall dedicate threads to them and propagate those threads daily. I think the whole Qanon shit is pathetic and dumb as fuck; however, I find it funny how much yall supposedly detest that shit only to propagate it more here on ST. Yall probably talk more about Qanon than the Qturds tbh.
100% Agreed :tu

[RandomGuy]

You do realize that it costs more money to execute someone than it does to have them live out their lives in prison?

Guessing not.


Why? It shouldn't be.

If you are a libertarian, it absolutely should be.

Either you want to make it easy for the government to execute people, or you don't.

If you believe in individual liberty and rights, you want the latter. It should be difficult.

Libertarians believe in individual liberty and rights, they want it difficult.

If you want to make it easy, you do not believe in individual liberty and rights.

Ergo, you are lying when you claim to be libertarian.

[RandomGuy]

Not all three of those are equal, though. Two of them are proven wrong and the other is still a giant question mark.


Translation:

The fucktarded anti-science bullshit conspiracy theory I believe in isn't dumb.

:lmao

Sorry, get in the corner with the faked moon-landing asshat.

[Millennial_Messiah]

If you are a libertarian, it absolutely should be.

Either you want to make it easy for the government to execute people, or you don't.

If you believe in individual liberty and rights, you want the latter. It should be difficult.

Libertarians believe in individual liberty and rights, they want it difficult.

If you want to make it easy, you do not believe in individual liberty and rights.

Ergo, you are lying when you claim to be libertarian.

I am a libertarian but that doesn't mean I believe murder in cold blood, rape/pedophilia, nor even less severe crimes like fraud and theft should be legal. You're looking for anarchism, not libertarianism.

Pedos and serial killers, child killers etc. need to be executed, yes by the government. If convicted, they don't deserve constitutional rights, nor human rights nor Miranda rights or state rights. that isn't anti-libertarian, it's common sense. Is it more libertarian to say we should be spending more tax dollars to feed them when we can just execute them and eliminate them from the gene pool and end the vicious cycle (especially in terms of child rape)?

Homicide, amongst US Citizens within the USA, should only be legal for 3 reasons:

(a) - self-defense
(b) - defense of an immediate family member or spouse, or
(c) - if there is significant evidence that the person one killed has significantly harmed or murdered one's immediate family member or spouse.

else, they should be executed, not incarcerated. A life of incarceration costs six to seven figures of taxpayer dollars.

[Dirks_Finale]

I am a libertarian but that doesn't mean I believe murder in cold blood, rape/pedophilia, nor even less severe crimes like fraud and theft should be legal. You're looking for anarchism, not libertarianism.

Pedos and serial killers, child killers etc. need to be executed, yes by the government. If convicted, they don't deserve constitutional rights, nor human rights nor Miranda rights or state rights. that isn't anti-libertarian, it's common sense. Is it more libertarian to say we should be spending more tax dollars to feed them when we can just execute them and eliminate them from the gene pool and end the vicious cycle (especially in terms of child rape)?

Homicide, amongst US Citizens within the USA, should only be legal for 3 reasons:

(a) - self-defense
(b) - defense of an immediate family member or spouse, or
(c) - if there is significant evidence that the person one killed has significantly harmed or murdered one's immediate family member or spouse.

else, they should be executed, not incarcerated. A life of incarceration costs six to seven figures of taxpayer dollars.

Innocent people have been executed in the past as we do not have a perfect justice system. So you lose me there. Not sure that's a libertarian position; it sounds more like tea party.

[Millennial_Messiah]

Innocent people have been executed in the past as we do not have a perfect justice system. So you lose me there. Not sure that's a libertarian position; it sounds more like tea party.
A justice system cannot be perfect without brain-reading robots, which is innately communitarian and anti-libertarian, so throw that idea out.

Which do you think is better? A life long of suffering incarceration without parole over a false conviction (believe me - false convictions are rare, and the West certainly has a lower conviction rate than second-world places like China, Russia or the Middle East) - or a quick merciful death after a false conviction? Almost anyone who thinks it over, including those who could be facing such position, whether they are guilty or not, would choose the swift death option. It's definitely more libertarian than spending $X,xxx,xxx in tax dollars on the incarceration over the decades, both morally and financially. Patrick Henry said it best... give me liberty or give me death. THAT's the libertarian position. Incarceration for life is much more authoritarian, communitarian, socialistic, and also more inhumane and painful for the convicted to have to suffer for so long. It's really killing two birds with one stone, honestly.

[Adam Lambert]

A justice system cannot be perfect without brain-reading robots, which is innately communitarian and anti-libertarian, so throw that idea out.

Which do you think is better? A life long of suffering incarceration without parole over a false conviction (believe me - false convictions are rare, and the West certainly has a lower conviction rate than second-world places like China, Russia or the Middle East) - or a quick merciful death after a false conviction? Almost anyone who thinks it over, including those who could be facing such position, whether they are guilty or not, would choose the swift death option. It's definitely more libertarian than spending $X,xxx,xxx in tax dollars on the incarceration over the decades, both morally and financially. Patrick Henry said it best... give me liberty or give me death. THAT's the libertarian position. Incarceration for life is much more authoritarian, communitarian, socialistic, and also more inhumane and painful for the convicted to have to suffer for so long. It's really killing two birds with one stone, honestly.

You spend so much valuable time posting long and laborious blocks of absolute bullshit when you could be out there learning to talk to women so you don't have to drive across several states to get laid.

[Dirks_Finale]

A justice system cannot be perfect without brain-reading robots, which is innately communitarian and anti-libertarian, so throw that idea out.

Which do you think is better? A life long of suffering incarceration without parole over a false conviction (believe me - false convictions are rare, and the West certainly has a lower conviction rate than second-world places like China, Russia or the Middle East) - or a quick merciful death after a false conviction? Almost anyone who thinks it over, including those who could be facing such position, whether they are guilty or not, would choose the swift death option. It's definitely more libertarian than spending $X,xxx,xxx in tax dollars on the incarceration over the decades, both morally and financially. Patrick Henry said it best... give me liberty or give me death. THAT's the libertarian position. Incarceration for life is much more authoritarian, communitarian, socialistic, and also more inhumane and painful for the convicted to have to suffer for so long. It's really killing two birds with one stone, honestly.

I would choose the life sentence as DNA exoneration has managed to bring light to cases and get them overturned. It is a small number, but those are just the cases we are actually aware of. How many of these people are swept under the rug with their cases not being appealed because they are mentally ill and/or just don't give a damn. Those who can not afford good counsel are handed a public pretender, as they say, to defend them. And if you have ever sat on a jury, then you know good and well how much of a difference good counsel makes.

[Millennial_Messiah]

You spend so much valuable time posting long and laborious blocks of absolute bullshit when you could be out there learning to talk to women so you don't have to drive across several states to get laid.

dumb post, I've barely posted in the past 3 weeks because I've been out of state WITH WOMEN.... :lol

I choose to be out of state because Texas females just don't do it for me anymore. Especially Hispanics... just not my type.


I would choose the life sentence as DNA exoneration has managed to bring light to cases and get them overturned. It is a small number, but those are just the cases we are actually aware of. How many of these people are swept under the rug with their cases not being appealed because they are mentally ill and/or just don't give a damn. Those who can not afford good counsel are handed a public pretender, as they say, to defend them. And if you have ever sat on a jury, then you know good and well how much of a difference good counsel makes.

As a juror I wouldn't give a damn about what a lawyer says, they're like used car salesmen, just mercenaries to make a buck doing their job vouching for their client. Only thing I'd care about is what the independent people in the court room have to say about the facts and the evidence. And for the record I lean towards criminal exoneration vs. conviction, even if it's not a right wing stance, it's a libertarian stance for sure. In civil cases I am against "tort reform" and support large lawsuits vs. big corporations... I do support tax fraud convictions vs. multi billionaires like Bezos who are repeat tax fraudsters. The only "tort reform" that needs to happen is to prohibit non-compete clauses in employment contracts and to prohibit employers from suing employees/ex-employees (but not the other way around). I do believe in pro-employee civil law.

[Will Hunting]

As a juror I wouldn't give a damn about what a lawyer says, they're like used car salesmen, just mercenaries to make a buck doing their job vouching for their client. Only thing I'd care about is what the independent people in the court room have to say about the facts and the evidence. And for the record I lean towards criminal exoneration vs. conviction, even if it's not a right wing stance, it's a libertarian stance for sure. In civil cases I am against "tort reform" and support large lawsuits vs. big corporations... I do support tax fraud convictions vs. multi billionaires like Bezos who are repeat tax fraudsters. The only "tort reform" that needs to happen is to prohibit non-compete clauses in employment contracts and to prohibit employers from suing employees/ex-employees (but not the other way around). I do believe in pro-employee civil law.
As a juror there could be evidence you never see or witness testimony you never hear because a lawyer fucks up in his line of questioning and/or getting evidence admitted (visa versa there could be evidence and testimony you see that a half decent lawyer would have been able to get excluded).

[ElNono]

Tangential, but still don’t understand why would anybody admit to being a libertarian, unless you readily want to be catalogued as a braindead idiot. Libertardianism is basically the conservative utopia of a de minis, and preferably no government. The notion of ‘freedom’ by everybody being on their own and doing its thing. Besides the whole selfish aspect to it (known as ‘individualism’ in conservatism), that’s exactly where this nation was while getting fingered by the Brits.
Not to mention that libertarian ideals are entirely disconnected with the real world, never won a democratic election (and likely never will), never governed (and likely never will), and it almost sounds like an excuse not to be grouped with the evangelical mongoloids.

[James White!]

:lol