Jan 6th Commission: subpoenas sent, US Marshals to round up recalcitract witnesses

[Winehole23]

in the crosshairs, Trump toady Jeffrey Bossert Clark

DOJ officials aren't supposed to act like the president's personal lawyers, let alone try to fix elections he lost.


“The Select Committee’s investigation has revealed credible evidence that you attempted to involve the Department of Justice in efforts to interrupt the peaceful transfer of power,” the chairman of the committee, Democratic Rep. Bennie Thompson of Mississippi, wrote in a letter to Clark announcing the subpoena.


While Trump ultimately did not appoint Clark acting attorney general, Clark’s “efforts risked involving the Department of Justice in actions that lacked evidentiary foundation and threatened to subvert the rule of law,” Thompson added.
https://www.wowt.com/2021/10/13/jan-6-committee-subpoenas-former-justice-dept-lawyer/

[Thread]

Put this issue into the court system and ultimately the SC will decide it once and for all.

[Winehole23]

remember Susan McDougal?

sauce for the gander is sauce for the goose

https://editorial01.shutterstock.com/wm-preview-1500/6505244a/0c1fd45b/whitewater-mcdougal-little-rock-usa-shutterstock-editorial-6505244a.jpg

[Thread]

remember Susan McDougal?

sauce for the gander is sauce for the goose

https://editorial01.shutterstock.com/wm-preview-1500/6505244a/0c1fd45b/whitewater-mcdougal-little-rock-usa-shutterstock-editorial-6505244a.jpg


Put this issue into the court system and ultimately the SC will decide it once and for all.

[hater]

in the crosshairs, Trump toady Jeffrey Bossert Clark

DOJ officials aren't supposed to act like the president's personal lawyers, let alone try to fix elections he lost.

https://www.wowt.com/2021/10/13/jan-6-committee-subpoenas-former-justice-dept-lawyer/

:lmao

[Winehole23]

#StillWithHim

[boutons_deux]

https://scontent-lga3-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.6435-9/245623669_218021057096143_4189737797421468476_n.jp g?_nc_cat=102&_nc_rgb565=1&ccb=1-5&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=WzDJqYlSRKgAX_fmwO9&_nc_ht=scontent-lga3-2.xx&oh=5d34e38cb34e99cb59f674fff6f506a6&oe=618CE37E

[Thread]

#StillWithHim

- "No sir, you couldn't drag me away."

- "Sgt. Al Powell" - "Die Hard"

[Thread]

https://scontent-lga3-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.6435-9/245623669_218021057096143_4189737797421468476_n.jp g?_nc_cat=102&_nc_rgb565=1&ccb=1-5&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=WzDJqYlSRKgAX_fmwO9&_nc_ht=scontent-lga3-2.xx&oh=5d34e38cb34e99cb59f674fff6f506a6&oe=618CE37E

Put it into the court system and ultimately let the Supreme Court decide it once and for all.

[Ef-man]

https://scontent-lga3-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.6435-9/245623669_218021057096143_4189737797421468476_n.jp g?_nc_cat=102&_nc_rgb565=1&ccb=1-5&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=WzDJqYlSRKgAX_fmwO9&_nc_ht=scontent-lga3-2.xx&oh=5d34e38cb34e99cb59f674fff6f506a6&oe=618CE37E

Am sure trump will donate to bannon’s legal gofundme account.

[Thread]

Am sure trump will donate to bannon’s legal gofundme account.


Put it into the court system and ultimately let the Supreme Court decide it once and for all.

[Winehole23]

Am sure trump will donate to bannon’s legal gofundme account.it'll take time dispel the executive privilege claim.

until that happens, nothing will happen to Bannon, who can say he'd be happy to comply once the legal uncertainty about the legality of the subpoena is cleared up.

[Thread]

it'll take time dispel the executive privilege claim.

until that happens, nothing will happen to Bannon, who can say he'd be happy to comply once the legal uncertainty about the legality of the subpoena is cleared up.


Put this issue into the court system and ultimately the SC will decide it once and for all.

[Trill Clinton]

remember Susan McDougal?

sauce for the gander is sauce for the goose

https://editorial01.shutterstock.com/wm-preview-1500/6505244a/0c1fd45b/whitewater-mcdougal-little-rock-usa-shutterstock-editorial-6505244a.jpg

Cute sandals

[Millennial_Messiah]

Let SCOTUS decide.

Jan 6th was an absolute zero compared to last summer's mass riots, lootings and vandalism around the USA. Those are the ones that really need to be prosecuted and those guilty need to be incarcerated for a very long time. Those destroyed not only property but people's livelihoods. "In the name of George Floyd" is a bullshit and sorry excuse.

[spurraider21]

https://be.chewy.com/wp-content/uploads/macaw-parrot-yell-TS-515864652-1.jpg

[ChumpDumper]

Let SCOTUS decide.Decide what?

[ElNono]

https://scontent-lga3-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.6435-9/245623669_218021057096143_4189737797421468476_n.jp g?_nc_cat=102&_nc_rgb565=1&ccb=1-5&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=WzDJqYlSRKgAX_fmwO9&_nc_ht=scontent-lga3-2.xx&oh=5d34e38cb34e99cb59f674fff6f506a6&oe=618CE37E

All these posts are terrible bouts... find someplace else to spam this shit

[boutons_deux]

All these posts are terrible bouts... find someplace else to spam this shit

G F Y

[boutons_deux]

Bannon ...

"citing a yet-to-be-filed suit :lol from former President Trump (https://thehill.com/people/donald-trump)

claiming documents and testimony sought by the committee are covered by executive privilege."

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/576782-jan-6-panel-to-pursue-criminal-contempt-referral-for-bannon

[spurraider21]

All these posts are terrible bouts... find someplace else to spam this shit
i had him on ignore long before derp. and with your tool, dont even see the skeleton of the post anymore

[Ef-man]

it'll take time dispel the executive privilege claim.

until that happens, nothing will happen to Bannon, who can say he'd be happy to comply once the legal uncertainty about the legality of the subpoena is cleared up.

Seriously, am sure trump will donate a complimentary 9 hole coupon to golf at any of his resorts (during off hours only, am sure) surely worth $1,000,000 that trump can write off in taxes.

[benefactor]

i had him on ignore long before derp. and with your tool, dont even see the skeleton of the post anymore
Dale too tbh. He just spams now

[baseline bum]

Dale too tbh. He just spams now

When did Dale not spam?

[spurraider21]

Dale too tbh. He just spams now
boutons/spurshomer/andy were all on my ignore list well before derp

[Thread]

Dale too tbh. He just spams now

You've never liked me, bene, for any length of time. Christ, one minute I'm in, the next minute I'm out. In & out---In & out. You're a good time Charlie, bene.

[Thread]

When did Dale not spam?

Christ, and I put my signature on your behalf a fortnight ago and now you stab me in the back a day before Friday, bum.

You're a little better than bene thru the years, but not much, bum, and what [better] you are is fleeting. Christ, one minute I'm in. The next minute I'm out. In & out---In & out.

[baseline bum]

Christ, and I put my signature on your behalf a fortnight ago and now you stab me in the back a day before Friday, bum.

You're a little better than bene thru the years, but not much, bum, and what [better] you are is fleeting. Christ, one minute I'm in. The next minute I'm out. In & out---In & out.

C'mon cubby, you were spamming 6 and second fifth for years

[Thread]

C'mon cubby, you were spamming 6 and second fifth for years

Yeah, but it's not your place to call me on the carpet about it, GD, it!!! That would be bouts, or, the Dumper's place, not your's, or, bene's.

In the sage words of "Sheriff Andy Taylor"---"Act like somebody."

[RandomGuy]

Let SCOTUS decide.

Jan 6th was an absolute zero compared to last summer's mass riots, lootings and vandalism around the USA. Those are the ones that really need to be prosecuted and those guilty need to be incarcerated for a very long time. Those destroyed not only property but people's livelihoods. "In the name of George Floyd" is a bullshit and sorry excuse.

Quantify the damage. if it was so vast, it should be easy to do.

[benefactor]

When did Dale not spam?
He's in overload now though. President Biden pushed him over the edge

[spurraider21]

He's in overload now though. President Biden* pushed him over the edge





*defeated a one-termer who was impeached twice
fify

[RandomGuy]

All these posts are terrible bouts... find someplace else to spam this shit

Perhaps.

It is a good question. should bannon be locked up immediately? "lock him up"?

executive has already waived privilege.

[benefactor]

fify
:lol:tu

[Thread]

He's in overload now though. President Biden pushed him over the edge

Indeed. I don't deny my temper, my shit. I respond to triggers here just like the next asshole in the line. And the Winester triggers me something fearsome, i.e., I come in here from the TV in a good humor, read one of his fucking posts and I grab some jacks & timbers and start back down. That's my way.

I don't pull that shit of..."I'm not going to let him see that he bothers me. I'll just keep posting in regularity."

No, I take a fit on-the-spot and meet him on the square...and post shit that I believe bugs him/others in the group.

That's my way. To change now would be an affront not only to myself, but to the rest of the group.

[Adam Lambert]

All these posts are terrible bouts... find someplace else to spam this shit

The absolute worst. I lose brain cells reading that patronizing shit.

[Thread]

The absolute worst. I lose brain cells reading that patronizing shit.

You got little room to complain, Adam. You ain't no picnic.

[Adam Lambert]

Feels like another good opportunity to mention that I also have Dale on ignore.

[ElNono]

i had him on ignore long before derp. and with your tool, dont even see the skeleton of the post anymore

good idea

[ElNono]

Perhaps.

It is a good question. should bannon be locked up immediately? "lock him up"?

executive has already waived privilege.

No, it's not a good question and no there's absolutely zero legal grounds to "lock him up" immediately.

It's really a a terrible post to get dumb people like bouts aroused.

[Thread]

Feels like another good opportunity to mention that I also have Dale on ignore.

Sometimes (yes,) and sometimes (no). You're another one who can't make their mind up. Why? Simple, because you're afraid.

[Thread]

Perhaps.

It is a good question. (((should bannon be locked up immediately?))) "lock him up"?

executive has already waived privilege.

That's what you'll/we'll have to do in order to lodge the issue into the courts. He'll be released on bond immediately and the clock will start.

President Trump didn't go to all the time and trouble of stacking that SC just to let a situation like this to be wasted.

Go ahead, RG...

Chop/chop.

[Millennial_Messiah]

Quantify the damage. if it was so vast, it should be easy to do.

Trillions of dollars in property damage and business losses due to theft of goods, destruction of property
Hundreds to thousands of businesses nationwide victims of vandalism, shoplifting, looting
Double-digit lives lost, about half of which were minorities; but that's irrelevant.
Blue mayors and governors not enforcing their own mask and social distancing mandates on the rioters all of last summer, May-September 2020.

[RandomGuy]

Quantify the damage. if it was so vast, it should be easy to do.


Trillions of dollars in property damage and business losses due to theft of goods, destruction of property
Hundreds to thousands of businesses nationwide victims of vandalism, shoplifting, looting

Link?

Source?

[koriwhat]

Dale too tbh. He just spams now

He spams and you stalk... :lol

[RandomGuy]

:lol (listens for the sound of frantic googling)

what is the sound of one idiot discovering he has been duped by propaganda?

[Millennial_Messiah]

Link?

Source?
Now, your turn to quantify the "damage" from January 6th...

A few selfies, zero property damage, a podium temporarily confiscated but returned. One US Citizen murdered by feds. Zero officials or others killed. Zero congressmen/senators injured.

[RandomGuy]

Quantify the damage [from the 2020 george floyd protests]. if it was so vast, it should be easy to do.


Trillions of dollars in property damage and business losses due to theft of goods, destruction of property
Hundreds to thousands of businesses nationwide victims of vandalism, shoplifting, looting


Link?

Source?


[changes subject]

That is not a link, nor is it a source.

You claimed "trillions in dollars of damages".

I would like to see some evidence of this claim. Your assertion, your burden of proof.

[RandomGuy]

Trillions. :lmao

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/02/2020-protests-changed-insurance-forever/

Approximatly 2bn, per an industry tally as of Feb of this year, although it is not well sourced.

So "trillions" was an exaggeration by four orders of magnitude.

Right-wing propaganda sure made it seem like the entire country was burning to the ground. This... is a modest hurricane spread over a nation of 330M and with a GDP of roughly 21Tn

[RandomGuy]

No, it's not a good question and no there's absolutely zero legal grounds to "lock him up" immediately.

It's really a a terrible post to get dumb people like bouts aroused.


The Jan. 6 Select Committee announced that it will hold Steve Bannon in criminal contempt after the former Trump chief of staff failed to show up for a deposition.

"Mr. Bannon has declined to cooperate with the Select Committee and is instead hiding behind the former President's insufficient, blanket, and vague statements regarding privileges he has purported to invoke," said Select Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson in a press statement. "We reject his position entirely. The Select Committee will not tolerate defiance of our subpoenas, so we must move forward with proceedings to refer Mr. Bannon for criminal contempt."

https://news.yahoo.com/january-6-committee-moves-charge-182300493.html

Criminal contempt would seem to be grounds. The question was, therefore, a valid one.

[Winehole23]

https://news.yahoo.com/january-6-committee-moves-charge-182300493.html

Criminal contempt would seem to be grounds. The question was, therefore, a valid one.Congress doesn't determine that all on its own anymore, I don't think it still has a jail.

A criminal referral to DOJ is just a suggestion. If there's a dispute about the validity of the subpoena, that will almost surely be allowed to play out first.

[ElNono]

https://news.yahoo.com/january-6-committee-moves-charge-182300493.html

Criminal contempt would seem to be grounds. The question was, therefore, a valid one.

No, it isn't. Not to lock him up immediately. The commission has no legal authority to jail anybody.

As the quote properly states, they will refer for prosecution (purportedly to the DOJ).

This goes to a court, Bannon will make his case, and only after that entire process he might face jailtime.

People don't just lose their due process rights because Congress says so.

[Thread]

https://news.yahoo.com/january-6-committee-moves-charge-182300493.html

Criminal contempt would seem to be grounds. The question was, therefore, a valid one.


No, it isn't. Not to lock him up immediately. The commission has no legal authority to jail anybody.

As the quote properly states, they will refer for prosecution (purportedly to the DOJ).

This goes to a court, Bannon will make his case, and only after that entire process he might face jailtime.

People don't just lose their due process rights because Congress says so.

Not with that SC as constructed by President Trump, El.

ha, ha.