Looks like Eduction is...

[Yonivore]

...next.

This is just too rich!

https://x.com/DeAngelisCorey/status/1886470403725680746


Chair of the Texas House Democrats just said parents send their kids to private school "so they don't have to have their kids with your kids."

He sends his kids to private school.

His response to this criticism?

https://x.com/DeAngelisCorey/status/1886470859189039462


*Deep breath*

Back on point. But it doesn't end there.

See, most Private Schools have strict admissions standards. both of our kids had to TEST-IN. We spent weeks prepping them and paid for assistance.

How do low income families do this?
Vouchers. That's how. Trust me, the private schools will take the money to educate anyone's children.

The Left is just too fucking much.

[Winehole23]

looks like the OP needs some "eduction"

[Winehole23]

unsurprising that he's for socialization of private school costs

[Yonivore]

looks like the OP needs some "eduction"
Yeah, it was too late to correct spelling. I went and looked to see if I can edit subject but, it wasn't immediately apparent. I'm not surprised you'd jump on it. touche' Winehole.

[Yonivore]

unsurprising that he's for socialization of private school costs
I'm actually for getting the federal government getting out of education entirely. But, since our government schools are such a disaster, I'm in favor of taking the money out of that money pit of socialism and allowing parents to educate their children wherever they like.

Ultimately, States will quit sending billions to the Department of Education for them to waste and local governments will get back to educating their communities the way their communities want their children educated.

[ChumpDumper]

...next.

This is just too rich!

https://x.com/DeAngelisCorey/status/1886470403725680746



His response to this criticism?

https://x.com/DeAngelisCorey/status/1886470859189039462


Vouchers. That's how. Trust me, the private schools will take the money to educate anyone's children.

The Left is just too fucking much.The private schools will just raise their tuitions to keep the poors out.

[Yonivore]

The private schools will just raise their tuitions to keep the poors out.
So, let's keep dumping money into a failing government school system?

What's your plan, Chump?

[Blake]

...next.

This is just too rich!

https://x.com/DeAngelisCorey/status/1886470403725680746



His response to this criticism?

https://x.com/DeAngelisCorey/status/1886470859189039462


Vouchers. That's how. Trust me, the private schools will take the money to educate anyone's children.

The Left is just too fucking much.

Of course the private schools will take the money. They're chomping at the bit to get vouchers passed.

Are you okay then with a private school teaching whatever they want using your tax dollar?

[ChumpDumper]

So, let's keep dumping money into a failing government school system?Are there good public schools, Yoni?

Yes or no.

[Yonivore]

Of course the private schools will take the money. They're chomping at the bit to get vouchers passed.

Are you okay then with a private school teaching whatever they want using your tax dollar?
If the school is good enough for the chair of the Texas House Democrats, why not for your children and mine, Chump?

What are you afraid they're going to teach them? Math? English? History? Civics? Ooooo, scary!

[ChumpDumper]

If the school is good enough for the chair of the Texas House Democrats, why not for your children and mine, Chump?

What are you afraid they're going to teach them? Math? English? History? Civics? Ooooo, scary!

Are there good public schools?

Yes or no.

[Yonivore]

Are there good public schools, Yoni?

Yes or no.
"Yes or no," it's like you're on a Senate Committee of some sort; good for you Chumpy. I'm glad you find yourself in such a vaunted position.

Now, to answer your question; None of which I'm aware. Charter schools, a kind of hybrid public/private venture, seem to perform better than strictly government schools. But, there is no yes or no answer to your question; no ones knows the full universe of the public school system. It's just a fact that the U.S.A is not keeping up with other countries in the quality of students navigating through our education system.

[ChumpDumper]

Everybody wanted public schools to be good until they were forced to admit black kids.

[Blake]

If the school is good enough for the chair of the Texas House Democrats, why not for your children and mine, Chump?

What are you afraid they're going to teach them? Math? English? History? Civics? Ooooo, scary!

Lol why did you leave out science?

[ChumpDumper]

"Yes or no," it's like you're on a Senate Committee of some sort; good for you Chumpy. I'm glad you find yourself in such a vaunted position.

Now, to answer your question; None of which I'm aware.So you are ignorant of the existence of any good public schools.:tu

[ChumpDumper]

Lol why did you leave out science?INTELLIGENT DESIGN IS SCIENCE!

[ChumpDumper]

Yoni thinks that kids coming out of Westlake are poorly educated and can't function in society because it isn't a good school.

How could it be? It's a public school!:lol

[Yonivore]

Everybody wanted public schools to be good until they were forced to admit black kids.
Yeah, Democrats were really butthurt over integration. Probably what set them about ruining our education system.

[Yonivore]

Lol why did you leave out science?
Okay, science. Happy?

[ChumpDumper]

Yeah, Democrats were really butthurt over integration. Probably what set them about ruining our education system.You're almost right. They all became Republicans in the 60s and 70s, then they set about ruining our public education system.

[Yonivore]

So you are ignorant of the existence of any good public schools.:tu
I don't know of any. Name one.

[Blake]

Okay, science. Happy?

Right, so if a private school teaches that Allah created the universe, you're okay with that?

[ChumpDumper]

I don't know of any. Name one.I just did, genius.

You think the Eames and Katy ISDs suck? Why?

[Yonivore]

You're almost right. They all became Republicans in the 60s and 70s, then they set about ruining our public education system.
No, they didn't; another Lefty lie. Bull Conner and Robert "KKK" Byrd and the vast majority of their cohorts in the Democratic Party stayed right where they were.

If you're hanging your hat on Strom Thurmond, that's weak sauce. He repented, he apologized, he acknowledged his racism, and he welcomed his illegitimate mixed-race daughter into his family. Meanwhile, the Lion of the Senate, Robert "Kleagle" Byrd continued spouting the "N" word and acting like a racist. Oh, let's not forget George Wallace! Fact is, the racist Democrats who split off to become the Dixiecrats, largely melted back into the Democratic Party when their segregationist ideas were soundly defeated.

Then there's Joe Biden. Anyone ever get in touch with Corn Pop or those black kids that liked to rub his legs at the swimming pool? I wonder if he's ever found a 7-11 he could enter without hearing an Indian accent. Democrats were and are the party of racists. Give it to Lyndon Johnson; he knew how to fool the blacks into voting for democrats for generations. Put them on the public dole, tell them their victims, and foment racial unrest. It appears, however, they're waking up.

Blacks, largely due to the propaganda of the Left and people like Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, et. al. have voted solidly with Democrats for generations. Rarely dropping much below the 90% mark.

It might surprise you to know President Trump increased his support in the black community by 100%, over the two election cycles. He garnered 8% in 2020. That rose to 16% in 2024.

You're delusional if you think there was some big shift of racists from the Democrat to Republican party. The only thing that changed is the Democrats develops schemes to keep blacks on the plantations.

[ChumpDumper]

No, they didn't; another Lefty lie. Bull Conner and Robert "KKK" Byrd and the vast majority of their cohorts in the Democratic Party stayed right where they were.

If you're hanging your hat on Strom Thurmond, that's weak sauce. He repented, he apologized, he acknowledged his racism, and he welcomed his illegitimate mixed-race daughter into his family. Meanwhile, the Lion of the Senate, Robert "Kleagle" Byrd continued spouting the "N" word and acting like a racist. Oh, let's not forget George Wallace! Fact is, the racist Democrats who split off to become the Dixiecrats, largely melted back into the Democratic Party when their segregationist ideas were soundly defeated.

Then there's Joe Biden. Anyone ever get in touch with Corn Pop or those black kids that liked to rub his legs at the swimming pool? I wonder if he's ever found a 7-11 he could enter without hearing an Indian accent. Democrats were and are the party of racists. Give it to Lyndon Johnson; he knew how to fool the blacks into voting for democrats for generations. Put them on the public dole, tell them their victims, and foment racial unrest. It appears, however, they're waking up.

Blacks, largely due to the propaganda of the Left and people like Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, et. al. have voted solidly with Democrats for generations. Rarely dropping much below the 90% mark.

It might surprise you to know President Trump increased his support in the black community by 100%, over the two election cycles. He garnered 8% in 2020. That rose to 16% in 2024.

You're delusional if you think there was some big shift of racists from the Democrat to Republican party. The only thing that changed is the Democrats develops schemes to keep blacks on the plantations.:lmao are you ignorant of the Southern Strategy too?

[Yonivore]

Right, so if a private school teaches that Allah created the universe, you're okay with that?
If that's where the parent chooses to send their child for an education. I would suspect it would be Muslims, correct? I'm not well-versed with Islam. Is that the claim? That Allah created the universe.

[Yonivore]

:lmao are you ignorant of the Southern Strategy too?
Nope.

Here, educate yourself:


https://www.prageru.com/video/why-did-the-democratic-south-become-republican

[ChumpDumper]

Nope.

Here, educate yourself:
No thanks, I'm not going to watch anything from a fake university.

Here, educate yourself:

What we get wrong about the Southern strategy

It took much longer — and went much further — than we think.
July 26, 2019

Most Americans have heard the story of the “Southern strategy”: The Republican Party, in the wake of the civil rights movement, decided to court Southern white voters by capitalizing on their racial fears. Republican presidential candidate Barry Goldwater first wielded this strategy in 1964 and Richard Nixon perfected it in 1968 and 1972, turning the solidly Democratic South into a bastion of Republicanism.

But this oversimplified version of the Southern strategy has a number of problems. It overstates how quickly party change occurred, limits the strategy solely to racial appeals, ignores how it evolved and distorts our understanding of politics today.

In reality, the South swung back and forth in presidential elections for four decades following 1964. Moreover, Republicans didn’t win the South solely by capitalizing on white racial angst. That decision was but one in a series of decisions the party made not just on race but on feminism and religion as well. The GOP successfully fused ideas about the role of government in the economy, women’s place in society, white evangelical Christianity and white racial grievance, in what became a “long Southern strategy” that extended well past the days of Goldwater and Nixon.

Over the course of 40 years, Republicans fine-tuned their pitch and won the allegiance of Southern whites (and their sympathizers nationwide) by remaking their party in the Southern white image.

Goldwater’s campaign did launch the Southern strategy, originally called “Operation Dixie,” by directly and aggressively championing his vote against the 1964 Civil Rights Act. As a result, the senator won five Deep South states, including 87 percent of the vote in Mississippi. But this blunt appeal may have done more harm than good, because, other than his native Arizona, these were the only states Goldwater won.

Four years later, understanding the risks of such an overt campaign against civil rights, Nixon’s team instead coded their racial appeals. The “silent majority” of white Southerners that the candidate needed to attract understood that Nixon’s call for the restoration of “law and order,” for example, was a dog whistle, signaling his support for an end to protests, marches and boycotts, while his “war on drugs” played on racialized fears about crime. Nixon also adopted a stance of “benign neglect” on civil rights enforcement, a message that his advocates, such as Democrat-turned-Republican Sen. Strom Thurmond, bluntly conveyed to Southern whites on his behalf. As Thurmond put it, “If Nixon becomes president, he has promised that he won’t enforce either the Civil Rights or the Voting Rights Acts. Stick with him.”

The strategy worked — but only temporarily. Nixon did not lock the region down permanently for Republicans, as the traditional Southern strategy narrative asserts. Instead, in 1976, Jimmy Carter, a white, born-again Southern Baptist peanut farmer, recaptured the region for Democrats. While white Southerners were attracted to the GOP’s new racially coded message, Carter had a trump card with these voters: He was authentically one of them. To overcome this identity-based appeal, Republicans needed to resurrect old threats and manufacture news ones. They did both.

During his 1980 presidential bid, Ronald Reagan expanded Nixon’s racial code to “colorblind” appeals for economic justice. He encouraged Americans to move past race, but also invoked the image of the “welfare queen,” a black woman whom Reagan described as having “80 names, 30 addresses, [and] 12 Social Security cards,” resulting in a tax-free income of $150,000. In doing so, he portrayed racial minorities as undeserving “takers,” while erasing the institutional racism at the heart of economic inequity. The message to Southern white voters was both that African Americans were to blame for their own standing in society and that government programs aimed at alleviating racial inequities would disadvantage white Americans.

The GOP also pounced on another emerging wedge issue provoking anxiety among white Southerners. Both Republicans and Democrats had long supported the Equal Rights Amendment. The 1977 National Women’s Conference in Houston, organized to push for ratification, featured former Republican first lady Betty Ford and Democratic first lady Rosalyn Carter. But bipartisanship couldn’t shield the ERA from a growing backlash on the right driven by Phyllis Schlafly’s organization, STOP ERA, which stood for Stop Taking Our Privileges. Schlafly misleadingly and ominously insisted that the ERA would force women to put their newborns in government-run day care, serve on the front lines of combat, embrace lesbianism and enter the workplace.

This portrayal resonated deeply with female voters trying to live up to the ideals of “Southern white womanhood.” This construct, which had been manufactured in the Antebellum era to justify the South’s racial hierarchy, asserted that white women were delicate and fragile and needed constant protection from black males. Over time, it cast white supremacy as chivalry while relegating Southern white women to a distant pedestal in the home where they could be taken care of by men. According to Schlafly, the ERA would destroy Southern white women’s way of life.

The resonance of Schlafly’s message provoked an enormous response. The activist and her allies attracted an audience of 20,000 for a “pro-family” counter-rally opposite the National Women’s Conference. The Republican establishment took notice, reimagining the party’s agenda to secure the support of these Southern white women. In 1980, after 40 years of support for the ERA, the GOP dropped it from its platform. Republicans also began championing traditional gender roles, politicizing abortion and gay rights (both of which anti-feminists associated with feminism) and redirecting their anti-big-government rhetoric toward the ERA’s federal enforcement clauses.

Though Republicans survived the internal threat posed by Pat Robertson’s 1988 presidential campaign, their relationship with Southern white voters remained vulnerable. In both 1992 and 1996, Democrat Bill Clinton captured five Southern states by capitalizing, as Carter had, on his insider status as both a Southerner and a Southern Baptist.

Once again, the GOP recognized that it needed a new appeal, one that portrayed Democrats as a threat to the brand of Christian values Republicans had been championing for two decades. This time the party worked to reframe its positions on a host of domestic issues, ranging from health care to foreign policy, into matters of religious belief. By making the full spectrum of political debates about fundamental values, Republicans forged an unbreakable bond with Southern white evangelical voters, who went from social conservatives to all-out Republicans by the 2000s.

The long Southern strategy had finally come to fruition, and it is still working today. The GOP’s partisan conversion of Southern white evangelicals is so complete that no longer must a Republican candidate hold authentic religious beliefs to secure their support. Nowhere is this clearer than in Southern white evangelical support for Donald Trump. Indeed, only 38 percent of white evangelicals living in the South identified Trump as a Christian, but 84 percent of them still voted for him.

Similarly, despite the long-standing national gender gap, where more women vote for the Democratic Party than men, Southern white women remain firmly in the Republican camp. In 2016, while Hillary Clinton captured the support of white women outside of the South 52 to 48, Trump bested her among white women who live in the South, 64 percent to 36 percent. And this result was not unusual: In 2018, only 25 percent of white women voted for Democrat Stacey Abrams in Georgia’s gubernatorial race.

Understanding the full range of the GOP’s efforts in the South since Nixon clears up any confusion as to how Trump, a man whose personal life seems to violate every moral precept avowed by most Southern white conservatives, secured their unyielding allegiance. Trump has wielded the GOP’s Southern playbook with precision: defending Confederate monuments, eulogizing Schlafly at her funeral and even hiring Reagan’s Southern campaign manager, Paul Manafort. Trump, in many ways, is no anomaly. He is the very culmination of the GOP’s long Southern strategy.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2019/07/26/what-we-get-wrong-about-southern-strategy/

[Yonivore]

No thanks, I'm not going to watch anything from a fake university.
Carole Swain, the creator and only presenter in the video is an African-American political scientist, legal scholar, and retired professor of political science and law at Vanderbilt University. She brings the receipts in her 5 minute video that just happens to be platformed by PragerU.

Stay ignorant, Chumpy.


Here, educate yourself:

What we get wrong about the Southern strategy
Just about everything.

I read your article (loved the use of the word "dog whistle," so lefty) and Carol Swain, probably an expert on the matter, dispels every one of the assumptions and unsupported assertion made in the article -- and made without any supporting evidence.

Seriously, who wrote this garbage?

[ChumpDumper]

Carole Swain, the creator and only presenter in the video is an African-American political scientist, legal scholar, and retired professor of political science and law at Vanderbilt University. She brings the receipts in her 5 minute video that just happens to be platformed by PragerU.

Stay ignorant, Chumpy.


Just about everything.

I read your article (loved the use of the word "dog whistle," so lefty) and Carol Swain, probably an expert on the matter, dispels every one of the assumptions and unsupported assertion made in the article -- and made without any supporting evidence.

Seriously, who wrote this garbage?pr:lolbably an expert

Angie Maxwell is a professor of political science at the University of Arkansas and a Carnegie fellow.

If that's important to you.

[Yonivore]

pr:lolbably an expert

Angie Maxwell is a professor of political science at the University of Arkansas and a Carnegie fellow.

If that's important to you.
It is important. I'd like to see her and Carol Swain debate.

It might be amusing to watch a white expert (who looks to be too young to have any first hand knowledge of that which she professes expertise) try to explain to a Republican black a flawed historical narrative the Republican black actually lived through.

By the way, why is she in the "Gender Studies" directory at U of Ark?

https://gender-studies.uark.edu/directory/uid/amax/name/Angie+Maxwell/

Curious.

[Thread]

Trump, blasting hair all over them walls.

Trump

[Thread]

pr:lolbably an expert

Angie Maxwell is a professor of political science at the University of Arkansas and a Carnegie fellow.

If that's important to you.

No. Him setting Kamala's top rung on the curb and telling her..."Now, say goodnight." is important to you.

[ChumpDumper]

It is important. I'd like to see her and Carol Swain debate.

It might be amusing to watch a white expert (who looks to be too young to have any first hand knowledge of that which she professes expertise) try to explain to a Republican black a flawed historical narrative the Republican black actually lived through.

By the way, why is she in the "Gender Studies" directory at U of Ark?

https://gender-studies.uark.edu/directory/uid/amax/name/Angie+Maxwell/

Curious.

What's your conspiracy theory here?

Explain.

And if you're actually curious, you can read her book. It's not limited to anecdotes that you clearly value more than anything.

[Yonivore]

What's your conspiracy theory here?

Explain.
No conspiracy theory. I just think Professor Swain made a compelling argument and presented facts to support it.


And if you're actually curious, you can read her book. It's not limited to anecdotes that you clearly value more than anything.
I actually might. How about you watch the video and tell us all where Carol Swain got it wrong.

[ChumpDumper]

No conspiracy theory. I just think Professor Swain made a compelling argument and presented facts to support it.


I actually might. How about you watch the video and tell us all where Carol Swain got it wrong.

:lol Swain's saying the Republicans were competitive in the south in 1928 because southerners were anti-Catholic proves Maxwell's point and not Swain's. I don't think I need to see any more.

[Blake]

Nope.

Here, educate yourself:


https://www.prageru.com/video/why-did-the-democratic-south-become-republican

Lol pragerU

[ChumpDumper]

Lol pragerU

:lol just straight garbage

[ChumpDumper]

Swain says there are no racists in the south now!

It's clear you didn't read the Maxwell article, yoni. She explains clearly how it wasn't just the Civil Rights Acts that turned the southerners to Republicans.

[Yonivore]

:lol Swain's saying the Republicans were competitive in the south in 1928 because southerners were anti-Catholic proves Maxwell's point and not Swain's. I don't think I need to see any more.
I think you do but, that's up to you.

[Yonivore]

Lol pragerU
Why are you being racist?

[ChumpDumper]

I think you do but, that's up to you.I did.

It's garbage.

It's a cartoon made to make you feel better about yourself.

The Republicans have been stoking your fears since the 60s on all fronts.

Everything is a crisis, isn't it?

[Blake]

If that's where the parent chooses to send their child for an education. I would suspect it would be Muslims, correct? I'm not well-versed with Islam. Is that the claim? That Allah created the universe.

Lol obtuse.

Religious schools are going to teach that their God created the universe.

[Blake]

Why are you being racist?

Huh?

[ChumpDumper]

Why are you being racist?
?

[Yonivore]

Swain says there are no racists in the south now!
Where'd she say that?

I would argue there are no serious Republican politicians, in the South, who are racists and would challenge you to name one that wouldn't be or hasn't been ostracized by his own party.

Democrats, on the other hand, still lionize Robert Byrd.


It's clear you didn't read the Maxwell article, yoni. She explains clearly how it wasn't just the Civil Rights Acts that turned the southerners to Republicans.
No, I read the article. All supposition on her part...fully answered by Swain in her video.

And, just like changing Global Warming to Global Climate Change had to be effected so the climate alarmists could explain away cooling, Maxwell had to change the Nixon's South Strategy to Republican's Long Southern Strategy to explain away decades of changing politics in the South.

I read the article, I'm just in agreement with Ms. Swain's historical account. She lived through it. Maxwell merely learned about it from her political heroes.

[Yonivore]

?
Prager is (or was, I think he's Christian now) Jewish and Swain is black.

Generally, the Left considers any criticism of minority races to be racist.

[ChumpDumper]

Where'd she say that?

I would argue there are no serious Republican politicians, in the South, who are racists and would challenge you to name one that wouldn't be or hasn't been ostracized by his own party.

Democrats, on the other hand, still lionize Robert Byrd.Which white racists voted for Harris?



No, I read the article. All supposition on her part...fully answered by Swain in her video.:lmao now I don't think you even watched the Swain video.


And, just like changing Global Warming to Global Climate Change had to be effected so the climate alarmists could explain away cooling, Maxwell had to change the Nixon's South Strategy to Republican's Long Southern Strategy to explain away decades of changing politics in the South.It's a long game with many facets. Why is this implausible?


I read the article, I'm just in agreement with Ms. Swain's historical account. She lived through it. Maxwell merely learned about it from her political heroes.She lived through the Hoover/Smith race?

:rollin

[ChumpDumper]

Prager is (or was, I think he's Christian now) Jewish and Swain is black.

Generally, the Left considers any criticism of minority races to be racist.Do you?

Explain why YOU personally accused others of racism.

[Yonivore]

Do you?
No, I don't.


Explain why YOU personally accused others of racism.
Again with the interrogatory style. I was being ironic.

I've been accused of not voting for Harris because I'm a racist. Same criticism when I wasn't voting for Obama. Couldn't be because I am not ideologically aligned with them, could it?

[ChumpDumper]

No, I don't.


Again with the interrogatory style. I was being ironic.

I've been accused of not voting for Harris because I'm a racist. Same criticism when I wasn't voting for Obama. Couldn't be because I am not ideologically aligned with them, could it?You could certainly be racist, but not just for your presidential voting record.

[Yonivore]

You could certainly be racist, but not just for your presidential voting record.
So could you, Chumpy.

[ChumpDumper]

So could you, Chumpy.
No shit.

Do white supremacists tend to support Harris or Trump?

[Yonivore]

No shit.

Do white supremacists tend to support Harris or Trump?
Do Islamic terrorists tend to support Harris or Trump?

[ChumpDumper]

Do Islamic terrorists tend to support Harris or Trump?Neither.

Nice dodge.

Coward.

[Yonivore]

Neither.

Nice dodge.

Coward.
Not a dodge, the question is stupid.

You didn't ask whether Harris or Trump pandered to white supremacists. Because, if you had, I would have answered 'neither.'

Candidates can help who chooses to support or vote for them. White supremacists, if they voted at all, would likely vote for a white candidate over a black candidate.

Your question was stupid and irrelevant.

[ChumpDumper]

Not a dodge, the question is stupid.

You didn't ask whether Harris or Trump pandered to white supremacists. Because, if you had, I would have answered 'neither.'

Candidates can help who chooses to support or vote for them. White supremacists, if they voted at all, would likely vote for a white candidate over a black candidate.

Your question was stupid and irrelevant.Sorry dude, white supremacists voted for Trump in 2106 and 2020 as well.

It's part of your core.

Why get so defensive about it?

[Yonivore]

Neither.

Nice dodge.

Coward.
Wait a minute, maybe your question wasn't so stupid after all. I tend to minimize and marginalize the bigot vote when I consider elections but, since you brought it up, at least one white supremacist was more likely to vote for Kamala Harris than Donald Trump.

Meet Kamala Harris-supporting white supremacist Richard Spencer: the alt-right poster boy supported Donald Trump in 2016, but said his re-election in 2024 would be ‘a catastrophe for everyone’ (https://www.scmp.com/magazines/style/entertainment/article/3285716/meet-kamala-harris-supporting-white-supremacist-richard-spencer-alt-right-poster-boy-supported)

[ChumpDumper]

Wait a minute, maybe your question wasn't so stupid after all. I tend to minimize and marginalize the bigot vote when I consider elections but, since you brought it up, at least one white supremacist was more likely to vote for Kamala Harris than Donald Trump.

Meet Kamala Harris-supporting white supremacist Richard Spencer: the alt-right poster boy supported Donald Trump in 2016, but said his re-election in 2024 would be ‘a catastrophe for everyone’ (https://www.scmp.com/magazines/style/entertainment/article/3285716/meet-kamala-harris-supporting-white-supremacist-richard-spencer-alt-right-poster-boy-supported)
:lmao

Did you just now find out about Richard Spencer?

What was your Google search?

[Yonivore]

:lmao

Did you just now find out about Richard Spencer?

What was your Google search?
That's right, Like I said, I don't generally give bigots much thought in elections. They don't really have any power.

Is Richard Spencer not a white supremacist? What'd I miss?

[ChumpDumper]

That's right, Like I said, I don't generally give bigots much thought in elections. They don't really have any power.

Is Richard Spencer not a white supremacist? What'd I miss?What were your search terms?

[ducks]

It turns out:

USAID has hurt the U.S.

The Department of Education hasn’t improved education.

The NIH pushed vaccines to cure a virus they funded.

The Department of Defense has been on offense, starting endless wars.

The Department of Justice has been creating injustice.

[ChumpDumper]

It turns out:

USAID has hurt the U.S.

The Department of Education hasn’t improved education.

The NIH pushed vaccines to cure a virus they funded.

The Department of Defense has been on offense, starting endless wars.

The Department of Justice has been creating injustice.
You want to occupy Gaza?

[Yonivore]

What were your search terms?
Is he a white supremacist? Did he support Kamala Harris?

[ChumpDumper]

Is he a white supremacist? Did he support Kamala Harris?This is the hill you want to die on?

[Yonivore]

This is the hill you want to die on?
You're the one standing at the top of it screaming. I'll just walk away if you won't answer questions.

Frankly, I don't care if he is or why he voted for Harris. I don't care how any bigots vote. Their vote has less to do with the candidate than their own distorted view of how they want things to be.

You carry on, though. Not my conversation.

[ChumpDumper]

You're the one standing at the top of it screaming. I'll just walk away if you won't answer questions.

Frankly, I don't care if he is or why he voted for Harris. I don't care how any bigots vote. Their vote has less to do with the candidate than their own distorted view of how they want things to be.

You carry on, though. Not my conversation.One guy?

Google search?

You sure showed me.:lol

[Yonivore]

One guy?

Google search?

You sure showed me.:lol
I showed you the bigot vote is a non-issue...no matter for whom they vote.

[Yonivore]

I showed you had a stupid argument and the bigot vote is a non-issue...no matter for whom they vote.

[Blake]

Do Islamic terrorists tend to support Harris or Trump?

Muslims tended to vote for Trump in this election

[Yonivore]

Muslims tended to vote for Trump in this election

Are you suggesting all Muslims are terrorists? Nice move there racist.

[ChumpDumper]

I showed you the bigot vote is a non-issue...no matter for whom they vote.

How?

You showed one guy who famously flamed out with a massive tantrum at Charlottesville and has been trying to find a way to be relevant ever since.

That's nothing.

You can try to deny it, but Trump has the white nationalist vote.

[Blake]

Are you suggesting all Muslims are terrorists? Nice move there racist.

Yours was a retarded false question from the get go.