PDA

View Full Version : Syria agrees to hide Iran's nukes



Crookshanks
12-20-2005, 02:02 PM
Report: Syria agrees to hide Iran nukes


SPECIAL TO WORLD TRIBUNE.COM
Tuesday, December 20, 2005
LONDON — Syria has signed a pledge to store Iranian nuclear weapons and missiles.

The London-based Jane's Defence Weekly reported that Iran and Syria signed a strategic accord meant to protect either country from international pressure regarding their weapons programs. The magazine, citing diplomatic sources, said Syria agreed to store Iranian materials and weapons should Teheran come under United Nations sanctions.

Iran also pledged to grant haven to any Syrian intelligence officer indicted by the UN or Lebanon. Five Syrian officers have been questioned by the UN regarding the Hariri assassination, Middle East Newsline reported.
"The sensitive chapter in the accord includes Syria's commitment to allow Iran to safely store weapons, sensitive equipment or even hazardous materials on Syrian soil should Iran need such help in a time of crisis," Jane's said.

The accord also obligated Syria to continue to supply the Iranian-sponsored Hizbullah with weapons, ammunition and communications. Iran has been the leading weapons supplier to Hizbullah, with about 15,000 missiles and rockets along the Israeli-Lebanese border.

The accord, negotiations of which began in 2004, was signed on Nov. 14 and meant to prepare for economic sanctions imposed on either Iran or Syria. Under the accord, Jane's said, Iran would relay financial aid to Syria in an effort to ease Western sanctions in wake of the UN determination that Damascus was responsible for the assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri.

Iran also pledged to supply a range of military aid to Syria. Jane's cited technology for weapons of mass destruction as well as conventional arms, ammunition and training of Syrian military.

Teheran would seek to upgrade Syrian ballistic missiles and chemical weapons systems. Under the accord, Iran would also be prepared to operate "advanced weapon systems in Syria during a military confrontation." Jane's said.

"The new strategic accord is based on the existing military MoUs, with the addition of the sensitive chapter dealing with cooperation in times of international sanctions or military conflict," Jane's reported.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Copyright © 2005 East West Services, Inc.


Is it much of a stretch to think that Syria had the same agreement with Saddam Hussein?

Extra Stout
12-20-2005, 02:04 PM
This is to Israel what the Cuban Missile Crisis was to us.

We are nearing the brink of nuclear war in the Middle East.

Oh, Gee!!
12-20-2005, 02:08 PM
Cancel christmas

Marklar MM
12-20-2005, 03:17 PM
Well, I know where the U.S. is going next. :(

xrayzebra
12-20-2005, 03:26 PM
Would anyone care to comment on where the Iraq Air Force went during the
first Gulf War? It wasn't to Syria. Does anyone want to speculate on where
the WMD during the second Gulf War? It is not a question if Saddam had them,
he used them. Just what happened to them.

boutons
12-20-2005, 03:51 PM
Shiite Syria and Shiite Iran were always known to be direct supporters of jihadi terrorism, but dubya didn't have the balls to go with his bogus hard-ass, dead-or-alive bullshit and went slam-dunkin after "easy" Iraq.

Now with the Iraqi Shiites going to obtain dominance with 60% of parliamentary power, (vs 20% each for Kurds and Sunnis/insurgents), it's only a matter of time until Syria and Iran make a move on Iraq. They can wait until the Americans "retreat in victory". The Sunnis/insurgents will be slaughtered in the civil war, the Kurds too if nobody helps them. The Saddam/Baathists/Sunnis and Iran already slaughtered each other in the Iran/Iraq war. more to follow.

====================================

washingtonpost.com

In Iran, Arming for Armageddon

By Charles Krauthammer
Friday, December 16, 2005

Lest you get carried away with today's good news from Iraq, consider what's happening next door in Iran. The wild pronouncements of the new Iranian president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, have gotten sporadic press ever since he called for Israel to be wiped off the map. He subsequently amended himself to say that Israel should simply be extirpated from the Middle East map and moved to some German or Austrian province. Perhaps near the site of an old extermination camp?

Except that there were no such camps, indeed no Holocaust at all, says Ahmadinejad. Nothing but "myth," a "legend" that was "fabricated . . . under the name 'Massacre of the Jews.' " This brought the usual reaction from European and American officials, who, with Churchillian rage and power, called these statements unacceptable. That something serious might accrue to Iran for this -- say, expulsion from the United Nations for violating its most basic principle by advocating the outright eradication of a member state -- is, of course, out of the question.

To be sure, Holocaust denial and calls for Israel's destruction are commonplace in the Middle East. They can be seen every day on Hezbollah TV, in Syrian media, in Egyptian editorials appearing in semiofficial newspapers. But none of these aspiring mass murderers are on the verge of acquiring nuclear weapons that could do in one afternoon what it took Hitler six years to do: destroy an entire Jewish civilization and extinguish 6 million souls.

Everyone knows where Iran's nuclear weapons will be aimed. Everyone knows they will be put on Shahab rockets, which have been modified so that they can reach Israel. And everyone knows that if the button is ever pushed, it will be the end of Israel.

But it gets worse. The president of a country about to go nuclear is a confirmed believer in the coming apocalypse. Like Judaism and Christianity, Shiite Islam has its own version of the messianic return -- the reappearance of the Twelfth Imam. The more devout believers in Iran pray at the Jamkaran mosque, which houses a well from which, some believe, he will emerge.

When Ahmadinejad unexpectedly won the presidential elections, he immediately gave $17 million of government funds to the shrine. Last month Ahmadinejad said publicly that the main mission of the Islamic Revolution is to pave the way for the reappearance of the Twelfth Imam.

And as in some versions of fundamentalist Christianity, the second coming will be accompanied by the usual trials and tribulations, death and destruction. Iranian journalist Hossein Bastani reported Ahmadinejad saying in official meetings that the hidden imam will reappear in two years.

So a Holocaust-denying, virulently anti-Semitic, aspiring genocidist, on the verge of acquiring weapons of the apocalypse, believes that the end is not only near but nearer than the next American presidential election. (Pity the Democrats. They cannot catch a break.) This kind of man would have, to put it gently, less inhibition about starting Armageddon than a normal person. Indeed, with millennial bliss pending, he would have positive incentive to, as they say in Jewish eschatology, hasten the end.

To be sure, there are such madmen among the other monotheisms. The Temple Mount Faithful in Israel would like the al-Aqsa mosque on Jerusalem's Temple Mount destroyed to make way for the third Jewish Temple and the messianic era. The difference with Iran, however, is that there are all of about 50 of these nuts in Israel, and none of them is president.

The closest we've come to a messianically inclined leader in America was a secretary of the interior who 24 years ago, when asked about his stewardship of the environment, told Congress: "I do not know how many future generations we can count on before the Lord returns; whatever it is we have to manage with a skill to leave the resources needed for future generations." But James Watt's domain was the forest, and his weapon of choice was the chainsaw. He was not in charge of nuclear weapons to be placed on missiles that are paraded through the streets with, literally, Israel's name on them. (They are adorned with banners reading "Israel must be wiped off the map.") It gets worse. After his U.N. speech in September, Ahmadinejad was caught on videotape telling a cleric that during the speech an aura, a halo, appeared around his head right on the podium of the General Assembly. "I felt the atmosphere suddenly change. And for those 27 or 28 minutes, the leaders of the world did not blink. . . . It seemed as if a hand was holding them there, and it opened their eyes to receive the message from the Islamic Republic."

Negotiations to deny this certifiable lunatic genocidal weapons have been going nowhere. Everyone knows they will go nowhere. And no one will do anything about it.

[email protected]

© 2005 The Washington Post Company

spurster
12-20-2005, 06:04 PM
That makes it sound like Iran's president wants the US and/or Israel to bomb his country. I would guess that he'll get his wish granted.

Nbadan
12-20-2005, 06:35 PM
Would anyone care to comment on where the Iraq Air Force went during the
first Gulf War? It wasn't to Syria. Does anyone want to speculate on where
the WMD during the second Gulf War? It is not a question if Saddam had them,
he used them. Just what happened to them.

:lmao

We destroyed what parts of the Iraqi Air Force that didn't flee, and WMD's have a very short shelf-life making them more of a burden to Syria than any benefit, since these weapons are so costly to get rid of.

xrayzebra
12-20-2005, 06:41 PM
:lmao

We destroyed what parts of the Iraqi Air Force that didn't flee, and WMD's have a very short shelf-life making them more of a burden to Syria than any benefit, since these weapons are so costly to get rid of.

Then why are we worried about smallpox? Or anthrax? They have a short
shelve life. :lol