PDA

View Full Version : Solution found . . .


ShoogarBear
12-21-2005, 09:40 PM
. . . lose the first game of the back-to-back.
Dre_7
12-21-2005, 09:41 PM
unfortunately, that first game was most likely the only game I got to go to all season.
exstatic
12-21-2005, 09:45 PM
Play the Knicks 82 times. :smokin
sanman53
12-21-2005, 10:00 PM
. . . lose the first game of the back-to-back.

nice! haha!!!

:blah :blah
TDfan2007
12-21-2005, 11:13 PM
. . . lose the first game of the back-to-back.

that makes absolutely no sense. You still end up w/ only one win. I know you're kidding but still.
ShoogarBear
12-21-2005, 11:16 PM
that makes absolutely no sense. You still end up w/ only one win. Damn! And here I thought I made a major step closer to getting a head coaching job. Oh, well, back to the drawing board . . .
T Park
12-21-2005, 11:22 PM
^^ lol :lol
1Parker1
12-21-2005, 11:23 PM
Damn! And here I thought I made a major step closer to getting a head coaching job. Oh, well, back to the drawing board . . .



Shoogarbear for Head Coach of the Spurs!

:lol
FromWayDowntown
12-21-2005, 11:24 PM
Damn! And here I thought I made a major step closer to getting a head coaching job. Oh, well, back to the drawing board . . .

I don't know, Shoog. I think you're really on to something here. It's truly thinking outside of the box.
ShoogarBear
12-21-2005, 11:31 PM
Shoogarbear for Head Coach of the Spurs!Where the hell was this post? I need to have it framed.


I don't know, Shoog. I think you're really on to something here. It's truly thinking outside of the box.I have a friend who is always coming up with whack rule changes. His best one was that teams should play the overtime period first. That way at end of a close game in regulation you'd have one time trying desperately to avoid a tie, because they already knew they'd lost the OT.

:wtf :lol
spursupporter
12-21-2005, 11:38 PM
Solution : how about lose all the back-to-back games , and win all the other games including in playoff (since playoff no back-to-back)
Mr. Defense
12-22-2005, 12:35 AM
when Rasho is on the bench or in another uni, and Manu is healthy?

the back to back loss problem will be moot.
Despot
12-22-2005, 01:11 AM
Or have only the second string players play on the first night.
the second night come out full strength.
leemajors
12-22-2005, 01:20 AM
we lost a few of those back to backs with manu, and rasho isn't the reason we lost the second game of back to backs. teams lose games, not centers and shooting guards. rasho is obviously our best option at center. in the spurs system you play d or ride the pine...
leemajors
12-22-2005, 01:21 AM
Where the hell was this post? I need to have it framed.

I have a friend who is always coming up with whack rule changes. His best one was that teams should play the overtime period first. That way at end of a close game in regulation you'd have one time trying desperately to avoid a tie, because they already knew they'd lost the OT.

:wtf :lol


good rule change that would kill the spurs or make them shoot ft's better: make ft's one and one.
Spurs16212
12-22-2005, 01:25 AM
I think tonight they had their heads into the game. I don't like how the lead almost twindled into sigle digits. Beno, Rasho, and Fabricio need to be traded or their a** need to get in gear and get with the program.
leemajors
12-22-2005, 01:30 AM
you forgot nazr.
E20
12-22-2005, 02:06 AM
Why not try to win both games?
ShoogarBear
12-22-2005, 06:09 AM
Why not try to win both games?Whoa. Dude!
Slomo
12-22-2005, 08:54 AM
Why not try to win both games?
Nah. I liket the OT first rule better - it's more logical.
boutons
12-22-2005, 10:38 AM
"Why not try to win both games?"

because now isn't after mid-April. The season, and the fans, don't count.