Omg!!! Omg!!!!! Usc Wins!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[chode_regulator]

according to the superior intelligently enhanced analysts at espn, 2005 usc would beat 1955 oklahoma. damn i never would have thought that possible. :elephant :elephant :elephant :elephant :elephant :elephant :elephant

[mookie2001]

what?????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????


I guess the modern day nutrition is just too good

the only thing I can hope for is Bush to get worn out
is he durable enough to keep playing all these games?

[chode_regulator]

modern day nutrition>50's era nutrition
why would you even compare a team who has a starting center that weights 158 lbs at 5'8" to a team that no one on, except maybe a girl trainer, is close to that size. :rolleyes
i'll just keep my fingers crossed that reggie stubs a toe or something. :princess

[mookie2001]

ok princess

[Cant_Be_Faded]

I will start listening to Country and Tejano music if USC wins come January.

[Kori Ellis]

I will start listening to Country and Tejano music if USC wins come January.

Don't risk your eardrums like that.

[Johnny_Blaze_47]

You all know your chodes would be exploding if UT had actually won some big games and be the team with two consecutive national championships and be compared to the greatest teams ever.

[chode_regulator]

ummm.....actually, chode, this isnt the first time espn has done these stupid comparison games before. theyve been doing shit like this for years and ive always thought it stupid. so no my chode would not be exploding. i know that texas could beat 1955 oklahoma. im sure this years baylor team would fucking own 1955 oklahoma. so its stupid, all around, to compare teams like this. now maybe like 2001 oklahoma vs texas this year or usc would be a good game but why even compare teams that are any older than at the max 10 yrs.