Is Bush Lying Again?

[xrayzebra]

'US planning strike against Iran'


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JPost.com Staff, THE JERUSALEM POST Dec. 31, 2005

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The United States government reportedly began coordinating with NATO its plans for a possible military attack against Iran.

The German newspaper Der Tagesspiegel collected various reports from the German media indicating that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization are examining the prospects of such a strike.

According to the report, CIA Director Porter Goss, in his last visit to Turkey on December 12, requested Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan to provide military bases to the United States in 2006 from where they would be able to launch an assault.

The German news agency DDP also noted that countries neighboring Iran, such as Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Oman, and Pakistan were also updated regarding the supposed plan. American sources sent to those countries apparently mentioned an aerial attack as a possibility, but did not provide a time frame for the operation.

Although Der Spiegel could not say that these plans were concrete, they did note that according to a January 2005 New Yorker report American forces had entered Iran in 2005 in order to mark possible targets for an aerial assault.
================================================== ======

It's just more lying that Iran wants atomic weapons, right?

Or better still. What difference does it make. They should be allowed to
have them. They just want to protect themselves. Mean old USA, we
just want to take away their rights.

[ChumpDumper]

I have no doubt Iran is trying to make a bomb.

Too bad Saddam didn't have any WMDs, isn't it?

[xrayzebra]

I have no doubt Iran is trying to make a bomb.

Too bad Saddam didn't have any WMDs, isn't it?

Oh, he did. Just what did he do with them? He not only had them, he
used them. Or don't you remember that little fact?

[ChumpDumper]

Yeah, he used them on Iran back when he was our boy -- I guess you forgot that little fact.

So where are they?

[xrayzebra]

Yeah, he used them on Iran back when he was our boy -- I guess you forgot that little fact.

So where are they?

Nope, not at all. But the fact remains, which everyone now wants to
forget, he had them and used them. That we did support him at that
time does not change the fact that he had WMD. Does it?

[ChumpDumper]

That he had them then is not in dispute.

That he didn't have them when Bush said he had them is not in dispute either.

Too bad for you.

Play up the democracy angle to distract us from that. That will work except the ruling faction is pro-Iran now. How will they feel about our bombing Iran?

What a kettle of fish.

[xrayzebra]

That he had them then is not in dispute.

That he didn't have them when Bush said he had them is not in dispute either.

Too bad for you.

Play up the democracy angle to distract us from that. That will work except the ruling faction is pro-Iran now. How will they feel about our bombing Iran?

What a kettle of fish.

Now, did he have them when Clinton/Gore said he had them? Just checking
because they said he did. Hillary said that he did. Or is it just because
Bush said it that it was a lie? Not too bad for me. It is bad for all our
country that some want to try distract from the fact we are in a war.
Just as deadly as any we have been in. Or does losing about 3000 people
not faze you. That is also a fact. Bush didn't cause that. What is
it going to take to convince people like you that we are in a war, world
war. Iraq is only a small portion of that war. Oh, you folks live in a box
with no windows. God help us if you ever get back into power in Washington.

[ChumpDumper]

Now, did he have them when Clinton/Gore said he had them? Just checking
because they said he did. Hillary said that he did.So they invaded Iraq? They were all wrong, but Bush started all the killing.
It is bad for all our
country that some want to try distract from the fact we are in a war.
Just as deadly as any we have been in. Or does losing about 3000 people
not faze you. That is also a fact. Bush didn't cause that.Are you talking about 9/11 now? Would've been nice if you and Bush could've stayed after the ones behind 9/11 in the first place, but no you had to go and waste our time and money and lives in Iraq setting up a government sympathetic to the next guys we want to bomb.

[Ocotillo]

What is
it going to take to convince people like you that we are in a war, world
war.

When the nation besides the military starts acting like it.

Why are taxes being cut during a time of war?

Why are we not sacrificing to vanquish our enemy?

Why is there not draft and the military is struggling to meet recruiting quotas?

This administration is not acting like there is a war. They are half-assing it.

The only people who are on a war footing are the poor folks who have been shipped over to Iraq.

If our national security was truly at threat, we would be on a war footing with taxes being raised, military munitions being manufactured, gas being rationed, military conscription enacted......

Americans can't be sold on any of that because Saddam Hussein was never a direct threat to this nations security.

[SA210]

:lmao what a moron

"This notion that the United States is getting ready to attack Iran is simply ridiculous. And having said that, all options are on the table."

—George W. Bush, Brussels, Belgium, Feb. 22, 2005

[FromWayDowntown]

Are you talking about 9/11 now? Would've been nice if you and Bush could've stayed after the ones behind 9/11 in the first place, but no you had to go and waste our time and money and lives in Iraq setting up a government sympathetic to the next guys we want to bomb.

Don't bother him with facts, Chump. Hot rhetoric is always easier to deal with than real facts -- real facts like the fact that Democrats and the overwhelming majority of the American people supported the President in his push to war in Afghanistan. Or that the war in Afghanistan was justified because that nation's government harbored and would not turn over the terrorists who plotted and executed the horrendous attacks on September 11, 2001.

The same Democrats and citizens who were (and still are) supportive of the war in Afghanistan are those who "hate the country" and "only play politics with the President." Of course, those who support the war in Afghanistan are apparently in a different boat than the President, who's publicly made it quite clear that he's much more interested in Iraq than anything that might happen in Afghanistan.

Osama bin Who?

[SA210]

http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b381/livindeadboi/bush_binladen.jpg

[Vashner]

You libs sure like to circle jerk on Bush. Does he really turn you on that much?

[FromWayDowntown]

You libs sure like to circle jerk on Bush. Does he really turn you on that much?

Not as much as Clinton turned on the Right, which impeached him and got to hear all about the President's sex life.

[SA210]

You libs sure like to circle jerk on Bush. Does he really turn you on that much?What do comments like these from the Repugnants like you, xray, gaytown and the rest do to change the fact that Bush is a liar?

All day long yall post comments like we are against the troops or we will say anything to bash bush or anything to that nature, yet we have backed it with FACTS.

FACTS. something this administration is not interested in. Comments like yours actually don't change the truth.

[exstatic]

Is Bush lying? Are his lips moving?

[E20]

Did he stutter when he said it?

[SA210]

Did he even say it correctly?