Bush OR Saddam

[Bastian]

Which would you choose to have in power, if YOU could make the choice.

The line has been drawn. Where do you stand.

[turambar85]

Bush....only because we have the ability to impeach him. lol

[Vashner]

Saddam is great.. 19th province is ours.. Amerika should go home..

[bigzak25]

nobody here has the balls. i vote bush.

[ALVAREZ6]

Saddam can go kill himself.

[Mr. Peabody]

I vote Saddam, just so you can explain the wholly irrelevant point you are trying to make.

[Bastian]

I vote Saddam, just so you can explain the wholly irrelevant point you are trying to make.



There is no point to be made. This is simply to see who has the guts to admit where they stand. You voted. I will not judge you. I applaud your bravery. Good job.

[Bastian]

nobody here has the balls. i vote bush.



Where is your vote?

[turambar85]

Who has the guts to admit where they stand? I admit Bush has made some impressive steps in eliminating the constitution and implementing incredible spying services, but Spurstalk is safe........for now.

[mookie2001]

alright I see

how original

bush is better than saddam
how clever

what a prez

[Mr. Peabody]

There is no point to be made. This is simply to see who has the guts to admit where they stand. You voted. I will not judge you. I applaud your bravery. Good job.

How does this poll tell you where I stand. I don't care for Saddam and I don't care for Bush, but there wasn't an option for where I stand.

[turambar85]

Peabody, you missed the point. This is not about seeing where you stand, it is about who has the balls to test the arm of the Bush administrations spying capabilities and their adversion to dissent.

[mookie2001]

its like that xbox 360 poll i started as a joke


how many do you have
1
2
or more than 3?

[bigzak25]

Where is your vote?


it's there. :tu

[Oh, Gee!!]

Can't they co-exist?

[nkdlunch]

:rolleyes, how about Bush vs. the Devil? what a crappy poll.

[mookie2001]

John Kerry or Kim Jong Il?

[turambar85]

Well....if this isn't a clear sign of the end of times... Bush is not only doing well, but is leading in the polls. That has to be a 1st.

[Mr. Peabody]

John Kerry or Kim Jong Il?

Hillary Clinton or Lucifer, king of the demons?

[Oh, Gee!!]

So, if I chose Saddam as leader of Iraq, who leads the US?

[Mr. Peabody]

So, if I chose Saddam as leader of Iraq, who leads the US?

Don't try and confuse us with your completely logical line of questioning.

[ChumpDumper]

Hitler as your nanny

or

Bill O'Reilly as a pig semen collector

[Oh, Gee!!]

if O'reilly is collecting semen, who is feeding the baby?

[xrayzebra]

Peabody, you missed the point. This is not about seeing where you stand, it is about who has the balls to test the arm of the Bush administrations spying capabilities and their adversion to dissent.

He always does. :lol

[turambar85]

And Xray, thank you for providing the beautiful irony on missing the point on my claim that somebody else missed the point.

[BrokeBack]

He always does. :lol

:lol

[Mr. Peabody]

He always does. :lol

He always does what? Miss the point or has the balls to test the arm of the Bush administrations spying capabilities and their adversion to dissent?

I am not sure which statement you are responding to.

[turambar85]

And I am not sure how many times a simple comment can be taken out of context.

[turambar85]

Apparantly I was insulting your intelligence peabody, or at least that seems to be the consensus...so I must be mistaken. If so, I apologize profusely. I can not control myself sometimes.

[Oh, Gee!!]

And I am not sure how many times a simple comment can be taken out of context.


Probably as many times as you post said comment

[xrayzebra]

He always does what? Miss the point or has the balls to test the arm of the Bush administrations spying capabilities and their adversion to dissent?

I am not sure which statement you are responding to.

You have what? To test what? Adversion, who has adversion?

[turambar85]

........sigh

[bigzak25]

woohoo, Bush is winning 5 to 2!

only 7 people with balls. and one is a woman. for shame political forum peeps. i thought there was more gumption in this place.

i like how bush is the Red and saddam is the blue...:lmao

[Mr. Peabody]

Xray, I don't believe I saw your vote on here. This poll is right up your alley. Which way are you leaning?

[xrayzebra]

Xray, I don't believe I saw your vote on here. This poll is right up your alley. Which way are you leaning?

One of our rights in the USA is not to vote, thank you very much. Heck
when we win you folks always call it a fraud. But I will be voting in the
mid-term. And you know which way I will vote then, don't you. :lol

Come to think of it, I may do the dimm-o-craptic thing and vote two
or three times. :elephant :elephant :elephant

[Oh, Gee!!]

so it's settled, Xray is senile

[xrayzebra]

so it's settled, Xray is senile

You want to take care of me in my senility? You know pay my bills
give me spending money. Provide a nice warm confortable place to
hang out? Just checking?

[Oh, Gee!!]

You want to take care of me in my senility? You know pay my bills
give me spending money. Provide a nice warm confortable place to
hang out? Just checking?


euthanasia anyone?

[xrayzebra]

euthanasia anyone?

Cruel, cruel. Is there no end of the cruelty in this world?

[braeden0613]

There is no point to be made. This is simply to see who has the guts to admit where they stand. You voted. I will not judge you. I applaud your bravery. Good job.
I dont think voting for the unpopular choice on a spurs fan site political forum is really an admirable, brave thing.

[Cool2LOVE]

okay. so peabody, ohgee and robinson, have rights to bush bash.


the rest of you need to shut the fuck up. :lmao

[velik_m]

stupid poll

[Cool2LOVE]

stupid poll


to dense people yes. bottomline, it's a very valid poll.
libs hate bush cuz he's a repub. BUT...the war is the main target right now.
the 'unjustified' war. so...make the fucking choice. Bush as Prez or Saddam in power of Iraq. cuz if anyone other than Bush was prez? Saddam would still be in power. seems very logical. and most people are to fucking dense to understand that. they are isolationist in nature. don't rock the boat.

fuck that.

the boats done been rocked. time to settle this muthafucka. war was brought to US. now, we take it to THEM. ALL OF THEM. ALL OF THOSE THAT ARE AGAINST US AND HAVE THE RESOURCES TO INFLICT TERROR. Diplomatic means 1st and foremost. And if/when those fail. War. That's why we have the military.

So...you pick Saddam? You choose terror. You choose for innocent iraqi women to be raped. Innocent iraqi men to be killed and tortured on the whim of an evil dictator. You choose to IGNORE the evil of a dictator that could do harm to the US, just cuz he ain't done shit yet....whatever.

You want to wait til a city is nuked before retaliation? Fuck retaliation. It's ON. NOW. Get the Job Done before the Job gets done on our soil by the enemy. But continue with the 'unjustified' bullshit. Whatever works. The men with balls in this country will continue to fight to protect it while the rest bitch and moan.

[Mr. Peabody]

to dense people yes.


bottomline, it's a very valid poll.

cuz if anyone other than Bush was prez? Saddam would still be in power.



Does that also mean that if anyone other than Bush was Prez the 2200 Amercians who have died in conflict would still be alive?

[xrayzebra]

Cool2love, could you please post without the double spacing. I gave up trying
to read your dumb post. It just isn't cool.

[SA210]

okay. so peabody, ohgee and robinson, have rights to bush bash. :lmao

Hey, you can count me in.

http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b381/livindeadboi/animated_swirled.gif

[BrokeBack]

Does that also mean that if anyone other than Bush was Prez the 2200 Amercians who have died in conflict would still be alive?


people die everyday. Those that you speak of died doing a valiant duty for this country. I praise them. I'm sure their parents, though obviously devastated...are very proud.

[Oh, Gee!!]

people die everyday. Those that you speak of died doing a valiant duty for this country. I praise them. I'm sure their parents, though obviously devastated...are very proud.


BigZak, take all of your alters back to the troll forum please. Kori made that forum for you and your multiple personalities, go play there instead of here.

[mookie2001]

libs hate bush cuz he's a repub

I would say there are many upon many more valid reasons than that

[Cool2LOVE]

BigZak, take all of your alters back to the troll forum please. Kori made that forum for you and your multiple personalities, go play there instead of here.



fuck you gee, that's a valid take. your quote above is not.

[SA210]

^^^another personality.

[gtownspur]

^another pussyassed homo.

[ChumpDumper]

So could there be a poll with the choices:

Bush as US President

or

300,000 in Darfur hacked to death with machetes?

[Oh, Gee!!]

Ice Cream for Dessert

or

Eggs for breakfast.

Are you brave enough to make a choice? Well then, I applaud your courage.

[SA210]

^another pussyassed homo.
Another homerotic message from gtown.

[smeagol]

Why do the people with less than 10 posts who start polls, usually start polls which make little sense?

[danyel]

Ice Cream for Dessert

or

Eggs for breakfast.

Are you brave enough to make a choice? Well then, I applaud your courage.

Ice Cream for Dessert, breakfast is so overrated in the US...

[zeleni]

Is there a choice? Who makes the call, please?

[gtownspur]

So could there be a poll with the choices:

Bush as US President

or

300,000 in Darfur hacked to death with machetes?


WTF? you're high. The Sudanese wars had been raging long before Bush was president.

[gtownspur]

Another homerotic message from gtown.


If what i said about you was homoerotic, then you'd be the only one on hear who found it erotic.

[Chairman Kim]

Well....if this isn't a clear sign of the end of times... Bush is not only doing well, but is leading in the polls. That has to be a 1st.

Kim Jong Il

[ChumpDumper]

WTF? you're high. The Sudanese wars had been raging long before Bush was president.Sorry, dufus -- the Darfur slaughters started in 2003.

[Yonivore]

Bush or Saddam? Hmmm...let me think...okay, let's go to the video:

Site's disclaimer [a suggestion I would heed]:


WARNING: This material is extremely shocking and graphic in nature. It should not be viewed by children. Also, it may be necessary to turn the volume down before watching the 4 separate chapters.


Please note, each chapter may take several minutes to download.

Chapter 1 (http://fdd.typepad.com/fdd/files/1.wmv)

Chapter 2 (http://fdd.typepad.com/fdd/files/2.wmv)

Chapter 3 (http://fdd.typepad.com/fdd/files/3.wmv)

Chapter 4 (http://fdd.typepad.com/fdd/files/4.wmv)

Source: Saddam's Entertainment (http://fdd.typepad.com/fdd/2006/01/alert_saddams_c.html)

[Mr. Peabody]

Bush or Saddam? Hmmm...let me think...okay, let's go to the video:

The fact that you feel that you must bring in evidence to help people make the choice is hilarious. :lol :lol

[Yonivore]

The fact that you feel that you must bring in evidence to help people make the choice is hilarious. :lol :lol
The fact the question was even asked is absurd. I didn't start this thread, direct your incredulity at them. In fact, it is they that suggest Iraqis were better off under Saddam Hussein.

But, I'm glad I amused.

[SA210]

The same could be said for America. Some people actually suggest that America's better off under Bush. But that's not true.

[xrayzebra]

The fact that you feel that you must bring in evidence to help people make the choice is hilarious. :lol :lol

The fact that you find this hilarious, is sickening. :depressed

[Mr. Peabody]

The fact the question was even asked is absurd. I didn't start this thread, direct your incredulity at them. In fact, it is they that suggest Iraqis were better off under Saddam Hussein.

But, I'm glad I amused.

I've already commented on the absurdity of the poll.

And when you say "they" in the above statement, are you referring to the "ass-tappers"?

[Mr. Peabody]

The fact that you feel that you must bring in evidence to help people make the choice is hilarious.


The fact that you find this hilarious, is sickening. :depressed

:wtf :wtf Did you not understand my post?

[mookie2001]

TRO that font, size and color did look scary

[Oh, Gee!!]

The fact the question was even asked is absurd. I didn't start this thread, direct your incredulity at them. In fact, it is they that suggest Iraqis were better off under Saddam Hussein.

But, I'm glad I amused.


I find the question absurd as well, but probably for a different reason than you. The question is absurd because choosing one doesn't necessarily mean that you would have to choose it to the exclusion of the other. After all, Saddam did lead the nation of Iraq for a brief time while Dubya lead our nation. They are not mutually exclusive choices.

[SA210]

If what i said about you was homoerotic, then you'd be the only one on hear who found it erotic.
Another post from gtown when he comes in here late at night when noone is on, then sneaks away to avoid anyone telling him to stop his homosexual references.

[Nbadan]

Were killing Iraqis at 10x the rate Saddam did, but we've also poured tens of billions of dollars of direct-aid and infra-structure improvements in the country. The problem is that the U.S. can't afford to rebuild Iraq on it's own and the Chinese, the Russians the Euro's and the UN are still stuck in the 'you broke it, you bought it mentality'. As well they should be because the U.S. went into Iraq, toke control of the Oil Ministry and all the foreign-run wells, and then arrogantly gave all the major rebuilding contracts to American crony companies with connections to high-paid Washington lobbyist.

Iraq is as bungled a mess as the Bush Administration and Washington.

[Mr. Peabody]

I find the question absurd as well, but probably for a different reason than you. The question is absurd because choosing one doesn't necessarily mean that you would have to choose it to the exclusion of the other. After all, Saddam did lead the nation of Iraq for a brief time while Dubya lead our nation. They are not mutually exclusive choices.

You can use logic to prove anything.... :nerd