PDA

View Full Version : spurs are now the best record in the west



gospurs21209
02-11-2006, 01:02 AM
and we have the longest winning streak in the NBA.......

Solid D
02-11-2006, 01:04 AM
True...but as they say "act like you've been there before". They have.

gospurs21209
02-11-2006, 01:04 AM
true solid

CubanMustGo
02-11-2006, 01:05 AM
Three tough ones coming up, and Cleveland is the second of a back-to-back.

hussker
02-11-2006, 01:05 AM
From the NBA FORUM last night....


Nuggets 110
Mavs 102

in the Pop Can tomorrow.

QUESTION: Shouldn't these MAVS links be in the TROLLS FORUM? Just curious...


TOLDYA SO!!!! :P

ZStomp
02-11-2006, 01:11 AM
Who cares.

No biggie.

Let's move on.

Amuseddaysleeper
02-11-2006, 01:12 AM
its "the spurs HAVE the best record in the west"

not "are"

gospurs21209
02-11-2006, 01:39 AM
im sorry amuse HAVE......

Buddy Holly
02-11-2006, 01:41 AM
its "the spurs HAVE the best record in the west"

not "are"

ANAL GRAMMAR PATROL ALERT!!!

mavsfan1000
02-11-2006, 01:42 AM
And the spurs have had the easiest schedule in the west.

hussker
02-11-2006, 01:43 AM
NOT AN AGPA! FUCK...it will be on those boards on the highways now!

Amuseddaysleeper
02-11-2006, 01:44 AM
And the spurs have had the easiest schedule in the west.

oh wow, what next

"the spurs have better players than the mavs"

:rolleyes

snowboarder
02-11-2006, 01:44 AM
:lol @ excuses ^^

hussker
02-11-2006, 01:45 AM
And the spurs have had the easiest schedule in the west.


Dallas Maverick Alphabet Song for Fri/Sat Feb 10/11 2006

ABCDEFGHIJKLONOPQRSTUVXYZ......

FIGURE IT OUT....Losers

Sense
02-11-2006, 01:55 AM
And the spurs have had the easiest schedule in the west.

:lol

Buddy Holly
02-11-2006, 01:56 AM
And the spurs have had the easiest schedule in the west.

Not really, considering both teams in the last 13 games respectfully, have played against teams with 26-27 and 23-26 records.

leemajors
02-11-2006, 01:57 AM
And the spurs have had the easiest schedule in the west.


2005-06 NBA RPI Rankings
RNK TEAM RPI W L PCT SOS PWR PF PA Exp. W-L Exp. WP
1 Detroit .576 40 8 .833 .491 1 4736 4329 39-9 .815
2 Dallas .577 39 10 .796 .504 2 4901 4549 38-11 .774
3 San Antonio .577 38 10 .792 .505 3 4555 4231 37-11 .772
4 Phoenix .543 32 17 .653 .506 4 5229 4936 35-14 .721

Sense
02-11-2006, 01:58 AM
It's just funny how the mavs fan always has a new excuse to come up with....

Buddy Holly
02-11-2006, 01:59 AM
2005-06 NBA RPI Rankings
RNK TEAM RPI W L PCT SOS PWR PF PA Exp. W-L Exp. WP
1 Detroit .576 40 8 .833 .491 1 4736 4329 39-9 .815
2 Dallas .577 39 10 .796 .504 2 4901 4549 38-11 .774
3 San Antonio .577 38 10 .792 .505 3 4555 4231 37-11 .772
4 Phoenix .543 32 17 .653 .506 4 5229 4936 35-14 .721

Wow, you own'd him worse than the time Marlon Brando tried to do Taebo.

TDMVPDPOY
02-11-2006, 02:03 AM
first they say there centers can defend duncan, fuck they couldnt even defend a injury plague denver frontline :(

Buddy Holly
02-11-2006, 02:09 AM
first they say there centers can defend duncan, fuck they couldnt even defend a injury plague denver frontline :(

Well, Martin who can't do dick against the Spurs is now the second coming of Wilt.

Oh yeah, an injuried and sidelined Camby is the second coming of Jabaar.

baseline bum
02-11-2006, 02:49 AM
And the spurs have had the easiest schedule in the west.

Of course they have the easiest schedule in the West. They're the only team in the conference that doesn't have to play the Spurs 3-4 times.

Buddy Holly
02-11-2006, 02:53 AM
Of course they have the easiest schedule in the West. They're the only team in the conference that doesn't have to play the Spurs 3-4 times.

*RIMSHOT*

:lol :lol

goliath
02-11-2006, 03:26 AM
Of course they have the easiest schedule in the West. They're the only team in the conference that doesn't have to play the Spurs 3-4 times.
:lol :lol :lol

mavsfan1000
02-11-2006, 04:50 AM
Well they have to play the mavs though. I was talking about these last 8 games. Dallas was unhealthy earlier this season and are playing catch.

Dre_7
02-11-2006, 05:00 AM
Mavs just had an incredible 13 game winning streak before losing to Denver, yet SA is still number one in the west. Wow. Shows just how good SA is.

mavsfan1000
02-11-2006, 05:23 AM
Don't worry. The mavs will go on another win streak now.

Dre_7
02-11-2006, 05:28 AM
Don't worry. The mavs will go on another win streak now.

That will end on March 2. :D

Darrin
02-11-2006, 05:42 AM
What was the Mavs reign? 20 hours or something? Does this even deserve a thread?

TheTruth
02-11-2006, 09:48 AM
Well they have to play the mavs though. I was talking about these last 8 games. Dallas was unhealthy earlier this season and are playing catch.
Man, you would get more respect here if half the shit you said wasn't stupid as hell. The Spurs haven't been injured at all? Timmy hasn't missed games? Manu hasn't missed games? Horry hasn't missed games? Nick? Fabricio? Mike F?

STFU, and come back if the mavs can ever beat the spurs in the playoffs.

Joepa
02-11-2006, 10:52 AM
Well they have to play the mavs though. I was talking about these last 8 games. Dallas was unhealthy earlier this season and are playing catch.

Spurs have been battling injuries all season. Manu was out for 10 games earlier in the year and we just got Horry back after 9 games out. Van X just came back, and Oberto is out right now.

Every team battles injuries.

SpursWoman
02-11-2006, 11:01 AM
Man, you would get more respect here if half the shit you said wasn't stupid as hell. The Spurs haven't been injured at all? Timmy hasn't missed games? Manu hasn't missed games? Horry hasn't missed games? Nick? Fabricio? Mike F?

STFU, and come back if the mavs can ever beat the spurs in the playoffs.


Yeah...I was kind of wondering about that oversight myself. I still have a hard time believing the Spur's record is what it is considering how much a few key players have missed.

mavsfan1000
02-11-2006, 04:15 PM
Man, you would get more respect here if half the shit you said wasn't stupid as hell. The Spurs haven't been injured at all? Timmy hasn't missed games? Manu hasn't missed games? Horry hasn't missed games? Nick? Fabricio? Mike F?

STFU, and come back if the mavs can ever beat the spurs in the playoffs.
The only player on that list that deserves mention is Manu and 10 games is not going to kill the spurs. Josh Howard went down, Stackhouse went down, Christie was a bust, Terry missed some games, Daniels went down, and etc. I think the injury ratio is 4:1 so before you call me stupid look up how many games missed by key players on Dallas.

ChumpDumper
02-11-2006, 04:22 PM
So if you are going to bitch about Manu's 10 games, you can't whine about Howard's eight or Terry's two.

mavsfan1000
02-11-2006, 04:23 PM
Don't forget Stackhouse, Terry, and Harris.

ChumpDumper
02-11-2006, 04:24 PM
I actually will forget about them, because $97 million should buy a team some depth.

infinite styles
02-11-2006, 04:26 PM
The only player on that list that deserves mention is Manu and 10 games is not going to kill the spurs. Josh Howard went down, Stackhouse went down, Christie was a bust, Terry missed some games, Daniels went down, and etc. I think the injury ratio is 4:1 so before you call me stupid look up how many games missed by key players on Dallas.

Your right your sounding even more stupid with each post. Your trying to compare champagne to beer. It ain't working. Injuries have plagued both teams and the whole easier schedule bs only applies to football where you don't have to play every team.

mavsfan1000
02-11-2006, 04:34 PM
ok now that I proved the mavs have had more injury issues why is that bs? Yes injuries are a part of the game and the spurs have had it easier. If the mavs can stay healthy they could win the division. I think we missed Harris last night since Terry got in foul trouble.

ChumpDumper
02-11-2006, 04:37 PM
Took you long enough to make up that excuse.

"The Mavericks have no weaknesses."

infinite styles
02-11-2006, 04:41 PM
I ain't gonna argue with young Cuban cause obviously you believe in your excuses and will take them to your grave. And yeah it the Spurs do have it easier since they just won the championship and everybodies gunning for them. Give me a break.

mavsfan1000
02-11-2006, 04:49 PM
Well a lot of players hate the mavs and show it on the court. Must be racist or something the way they talk about Dirk.

ChumpDumper
02-11-2006, 04:53 PM
And now....

The Victim Card.

infinite styles
02-11-2006, 05:01 PM
Well a lot of players hate the mavs and show it on the court. Must be racist or something the way they talk about Dirk.

Are you kidding me!!!! :lol :lol You just pulled the freakin race card with Dirk :lol :lol How old are you? Who is they and what have they said. Dirk bashes his own teammates, which most of them are black, when he's under pressure, so if anybody bashes him its probably because he's not a good leader and he can't play D.

Winnipeg_Spur
02-11-2006, 05:19 PM
http://www.strangereaction.com/imagehost/albums/userpics/10107/bagdad_bob_large.gif

Well a lot of players hate the mavs and show it on the court. Must be racist or something the way they talk about Dirk.

ducks
02-11-2006, 07:12 PM
Well a lot of players hate the mavs and show it on the court. Must be racist or something the way they talk about Dirk.
DUDE IT IS COMMON KNOWLEDGE WHEN YOU ARE PLAYING THE CHAMPS ALL TEAMS GET UP FOR THAT GAME!

IT MIGHT BE PLAYERS PLAY HARDER AGAINST THE MAVS BECAUSE THEY DO NOT LIKE OWNERS WATCHING OTHER NBA PLAYERS SHOWER!!!!!!!

5ToolMan
02-11-2006, 08:00 PM
The only player on that list that deserves mention is Manu and 10 games is not going to kill the spurs. Josh Howard went down, Stackhouse went down, Christie was a bust, Terry missed some games, Daniels went down, and etc. I think the injury ratio is 4:1 so before you call me stupid look up how many games missed by key players on Dallas.

As another poster said, you are comparing beer to champagne. Granted when you compare Stack, Daniels and Van Horn to Duncan and Manu, the Mavs have missed games. But you need to get a grip on reality if you are really making a case that the Mavs have been slowed more by injury.

Of The Mavs big three Dirk has missed 0, Terry 2 and Howard 8 games, and have had no lingering injuries the entire season. Otherwise, most all the Mavs injuries have been to second tier and bench support.

For the Spurs, it has been THE TWO most valuable players in last years entire NBA Playoffs, Manu and Tim who have been most hampered. Manu has missed 13 games, plus left a game with an injury early and came off the bench and/or played limited minutes to work himself back into shape 14 more games. If you can count, that is 28 games where the Spurs did not have the benifit the Manu who tore up the playoffs. And Duncan has had a very nagging PF injury effecting his mobility for over 35 games.

mavsfan1000
02-11-2006, 08:05 PM
I don't see anything wrong with Duncan. It is probably very minor because his stats are the same as always.

5ToolMan
02-11-2006, 08:09 PM
Well a lot of players hate the mavs and show it on the court. Must be racist or something the way they talk about Dirk.

Don't play the race card like and paint yourself more like an idiot. Yea, like that would be possible at this point. :lol

Like in life, most NBA Players will return what is given. The Spurs are one of the most diverse teams in the history of all of sport, in regards to race. Led by a star who respects all of his teammates and all of his foes, the Spurs don't have any such problems.

ducks
02-11-2006, 08:09 PM
You Are Full Of Shit

Anyone Can Tell He Is Not As Aggressive This Year As Last

5ToolMan
02-11-2006, 08:19 PM
I don't see anything wrong with Duncan. It is probably very minor because his stats are the same as always.

We tried to tell you, much of your problem is judging what you have not developed the skill to see with your eyes, by using stats. Tim's stats are about the same because Tony, Manu and some additional solid offensive support make his job much easier. Not having to carry the load as much, Tim still has enough game and knowledge to pick his spots and keep his scoring average up. If you think Tim's mobility is the same as before his ankle injury last year, especially as limited on B2B's, you need to go back to school and watch some tape.

That said, this injury will actually make the Spurs much tougher if Tim returns to near his form. In recent weeks, Tim's play combined with knowing the extended rest between games he will have in the playoffs, have made most knowledgable Spurs fans quite comfortable with what Tim and the Spurs will bring come June if the core gets/remains healthy.

5ToolMan
02-11-2006, 08:21 PM
You Are Full Of Shit

Anyone Can Tell He Is Not As Aggressive This Year As Last

Ducks, Mavs Fan might recieve the message better if are just a little more subtle in his education. :spin

mavsfan1000
02-11-2006, 08:22 PM
Well Tim never was the most active player. He is fundamentally sound and that's what makes him great. This so-called injury hasn't hurt the spurs at all. I could see what you are saying about Manu though. He could be playing a lot better than he has as of late.

ducks
02-11-2006, 08:51 PM
You Can Tell This Yearly Especially On Back To Back Games
Even The Announcers Commented On That
I Do Not Always Agree With Them But That Are Right In This Instance

Spurs Just Have A Deeper Team Then The 100 Million Dollar Mavs

mavsfan1000
02-11-2006, 09:47 PM
You Can Tell This Yearly Especially On Back To Back Games
Even The Announcers Commented On That
I Do Not Always Agree With Them But That Are Right In This Instance

Spurs Just Have A Deeper Team Then The 100 Million Dollar Mavs
You are full of shit. The one thing the spurs aren't as good as the mavs are is in depth. A bench of Devin Harris, Marquis Daniels, Jerry Stackhouse, Van Horn, and Erick Dampier is clearly better than the spurs bench.

ducks
02-11-2006, 09:52 PM
Ok If The Mavs Have A Better Bench Then They Can Handle The Injuries Better Then The Spurs

AlamoSpursFan
02-11-2006, 09:54 PM
You are full of shit. The one thing the spurs aren't as good as the mavs are is in depth. A bench of Devin Harris, Marquis Daniels, Jerry Stackhouse, Van Horn, and Erick Dampier is clearly better than the spurs bench.

And how many of those players have rings? I'll take the Spurs bench, if it's all the same to you. Thanks.

ducks
02-11-2006, 09:56 PM
Mavs Bench And Spurs Are Close
I Will Say Nve Is Clutch Not Sure If Any Of Those Players There Are As Cluch As Nve

ducks
02-11-2006, 09:56 PM
Ps I Forgot Clutch Horry
How Could I ?

mavsfan1000
02-11-2006, 10:24 PM
Alright the spurs bench is much clutch than the mavs bench. The mavs bench though will definitely carry you more throughout the game and the closers are the starters which is Terry and Dirk.

picnroll
02-11-2006, 10:54 PM
In the playoffs depth means eight deep, that's it. I'll take Horry over Dumpier or Van Pussy. I'll take a reasonably healthy Van X over Harris. Stackhouse probably over the current version of Finley. The rest are garbage time players.

infinite styles
02-11-2006, 11:35 PM
Well Tim never was the most active player. He is fundamentally sound and that's what makes him great. This so-called injury hasn't hurt the spurs at all. I could see what you are saying about Manu though. He could be playing a lot better than he has as of late.

Are you that fucking ignorant or just so stubborn that you can't admit when people are right. If Tim didn't have his injury we probably wouldn't have sucked so bad in the previous back to backs therefore eliminating stupid loses to the Hawks, Washington and Hornets, and to add to that better performances in some of the other loses like Denver. I'm not making excuses for these loses but I am smart enough to realize that Tim at 100% makes a big difference to the teams overall performance. So for you to sit there and say that his injury hasn't hurt the Spurs is foolish.

mavsfan1000
02-12-2006, 12:14 AM
In the playoffs depth means eight deep, that's it. I'll take Horry over Dumpier or Van Pussy. I'll take a reasonably healthy Van X over Harris. Stackhouse probably over the current version of Finley. The rest are garbage time players.
You haven't done your homework. Devin Harris>Van Exel, Daniels or Stackhouse>Finley, Horry>Van Horn, and Dampier>Mohammad or Rasho.

Despot
02-12-2006, 01:52 AM
You haven't done your homework. Devin Harris>Van Exel, Daniels or Stackhouse>Finley, Horry>Van Horn, and Dampier>Mohammad or Rasho.

Well, at least he won't be getting an F.

Darrin
02-12-2006, 02:12 AM
As another poster said, you are comparing beer to champagne. Granted when you compare Stack, Daniels and Van Horn to Duncan and Manu, the Mavs have missed games. But you need to get a grip on reality if you are really making a case that the Mavs have been slowed more by injury.

Of The Mavs big three Dirk has missed 0, Terry 2 and Howard 8 games, and have had no lingering injuries the entire season. Otherwise, most all the Mavs injuries have been to second tier and bench support.

For the Spurs, it has been THE TWO most valuable players in last years entire NBA Playoffs, Manu and Tim who have been most hampered. Manu has missed 13 games, plus left a game with an injury early and came off the bench and/or played limited minutes to work himself back into shape 14 more games. If you can count, that is 28 games where the Spurs did not have the benifit the Manu who tore up the playoffs. And Duncan has had a very nagging PF injury effecting his mobility for over 35 games.

Yes, your dick is bigger. Can we move on?