PDA

View Full Version : Humor me Murphy, Xray, Gculo etc



MannyIsGod
02-28-2006, 06:05 PM
If (I should say when, but whatever) Iraqi civil war breaks out, how will you call the Iraqi situation a success?

JoeChalupa
02-28-2006, 06:12 PM
Because it is better to have a civil war over there rather than over here?

Oh, Gee!!
02-28-2006, 06:16 PM
Because parallels between this war and Vietnam will be even clearer?

SA210
02-28-2006, 06:26 PM
Because supporting ANY war is patriotic.

ChumpDumper
02-28-2006, 07:38 PM
Dude, we're done! That mission was accomplished.

I saw a banner.

mookie2001
02-28-2006, 09:51 PM
manny with this thread youve fought back the darkness of change for one more day

Trainwreck2100
02-28-2006, 10:10 PM
As long as the oil feilds are safe, let them kill each other, it's one less thing to worry about

gtownspur
02-28-2006, 10:41 PM
If (I should say when, but whatever) Iraqi civil war breaks out, how will you call the Iraqi situation a success?

Well MannyisGirly,

It'd be a failure, and that'd somehow mean you were right about the injust war, abortion, gay marriage, card id voting, school vouchers, wiretapping, military tribunals, profiling at the airports, and anything trivial that'd make you have a liberal wetdream.

Cant_Be_Faded
02-28-2006, 10:44 PM
LOL

gculo
hahahahahaha
what a horrible horrible excuse for a human

gtownspur
02-28-2006, 11:02 PM
Roflroflrofl,

lolololol,(is that all you got?)

you should stick to teething Vince Young's shaft in the college sports forum.

George W Bush
02-28-2006, 11:17 PM
Roflroflrofl,

lolololol,(is that all you got?)

you should stick to teething Vince Young's shaft in the college sports forum.

Gayness again returns to the forum once gtownspur arrives.

Heck of a job gtownspur :tu

gtownspur
02-28-2006, 11:22 PM
Must your faggot ass obsess over me?

Talk about gayness, too bad you have to hide behind a character because you have zero takes on anything and are a genuine ass clown.

I thought spamming the forum with idiotic tabloids and liberal hack pieces were enough to convince dumbass liberals of your righteous ideology, but then you have to resort to this bullshit.

Get a life NBAdan.

gtownspur
02-28-2006, 11:24 PM
Gayness again returns to the forum once gtownspur arrives.

Heck of a job gtownspur :tu

and that statement is a fact. I arrived and you returned.

Kori Ellis
02-28-2006, 11:43 PM
Why are you all so obsessed with gayness?

George W Bush/gtown, if you are gay, be gay. But leave it out of the political forum.

Thanks.

Cant_Be_Faded
02-28-2006, 11:48 PM
seriously dah


instead of talking about G stuff, how about gculo (whomever that signifies) answering the question topic and humoring manny

notice how none of them (especially the etc) have given a response

smeagol
03-01-2006, 10:25 AM
War has been extremely successful. Iraq is a success. The US should invade Iran and Syria and put the same plan to work.

Oh, and the money that this war costs will be paid by future generations.

Perfect!

mookie2001
03-01-2006, 10:27 AM
whottt say you peter?

RandomGuy
03-01-2006, 11:31 AM
Must your faggot ass obsess over me?

Talk about gayness,


http://www.trephination.net/gallery/macros/gay_trying.jpg


Har, I just love an excuse to use that pic.

MannyIsGod
03-01-2006, 10:09 PM
bump

Cant_Be_Faded
03-01-2006, 11:07 PM
serrously dah

someone humor manny

gtownspur
03-02-2006, 01:01 AM
Ifs and butts.

JoeChalupa
03-02-2006, 08:27 AM
All this should be no news to Bush. He was told and warned about this but then again Bush had already decided to invade Iraq and nothing was going to change his mind.

gtownspur
03-02-2006, 01:01 PM
Civil war has happened to this country and it's now the best in the world. Civil war seems inevitable and might turn out to be a good thing.

Cant_Be_Faded
03-02-2006, 01:05 PM
Civil war has happened to this country and it's now the best in the world. Civil war seems inevitable and might turn out to be a good thing.


so now youre professing that civil war is inevitable

i think this statement would humor the manny

gtownspur
03-02-2006, 01:08 PM
Not that i was ever denying it.....

back to square one?

MannyIsGod
03-02-2006, 02:58 PM
Civil war has happened to this country and it's now the best in the world. Civil war seems inevitable and might turn out to be a good thing.

i think this statement would humor the manny

Murphy
03-02-2006, 03:12 PM
didn't we have a civil war over here a while back? And wasn't our country better after it?

ChumpDumper
03-02-2006, 03:20 PM
didn't we have a civil war over here a while back?So did Russia.

And Korea.

And China.

And Yugoslavia.

And Lebanon.

And Nigeria.

And Liberia.

And Spain.

And of course, Vietnam.

Sec24Row7
03-02-2006, 04:06 PM
A "Civil War" can't take place over there at least not in it's true form.....

The only thing that can really happen is an increase in insurgency.

It takes organizations of people for there to be a civil war... armed units of more than 5 people...

Problem is... you gather in a place with more than 5 people with us there... you are dead, period the end.

Shiites and Sunnis are NEVER going to get along. They have long memories and lots of history. For christ's sake Shiite's still mourn the death of Ali's son to the Suunis on the anniversary of his death by BEATING and CUTTING themselves. (that last sentence was more than a little strange).

We have the leaders of the groups talking. We have people from outside and inside trying to blow the whole thing up.

Will Iraq work?

Dunno.

Is it a grand experiment that took lots of balls to try?

For sure.

If it works will this administration be looked back on in 100 years favorably?

Damned right.

If it fails?

He will still be above the bottom half for leadership after 9/11.

Mr. Peabody
03-02-2006, 04:08 PM
didn't we have a civil war over here a while back? And wasn't our country better after it?

Well, hell, Lance Armstrong had cancer and then won the Tour de France. So having cancer must be a good thing, right?

xrayzebra
03-02-2006, 04:11 PM
^^Typical reply from someone of your persuasion.

Sec24Row7
03-02-2006, 04:21 PM
Actually we weren't better after our civil war.

Before the Civil war the South was the richest part of the country.

It has never up to the North since and never will.

Mr. Peabody
03-02-2006, 04:22 PM
^^Typical reply from someone of your persuasion.

:lol You must have a thing for me xray, because you have been following me from thread to thread. :lol

xrayzebra
03-02-2006, 04:23 PM
^^yep, you are correct. But wrong in the later part of your statement. The
North is dying, rust belt, remember. The south is growing. But South has had
much more political clout through our history than the North.

MaNuMaNiAc
03-02-2006, 04:25 PM
^^yep, you are correct. But wrong in the later part of your statement. The
North is dying, rust belt, remember. The south is growing. But South has had
much more political clout through our history than the North.
what is your point?

ChumpDumper
03-02-2006, 04:28 PM
what is your point?The point is they are waiting for the Sunday talk shows to tell them why civil war in Iraq is a good and desirable thing.

xrayzebra
03-02-2006, 04:28 PM
None really, just joining in the conversation. But the South was the richest part
of the US before the civil war and is growing by leaps and bounds now, while the
North and East is losing population and industry. Those are facts.

xrayzebra
03-02-2006, 04:32 PM
:lol You must have a thing for me xray, because you have been following me from thread to thread. :lol

No, I just don't think much of you anymore. Disagreeing is one thing, but
cursing or putting ones race down is not my bag. Should I call those that
disagree with me disparaging names. I don't think so. I take it that you are
Hispanic. So should I call you some racist name. Disagree all you want,
but leave the rest of the junk out. Follow you, I don't think so. But I will
post where I want, when I want.

MaNuMaNiAc
03-02-2006, 04:34 PM
None really, just joining in the conversation. But the South was the richest part
of the US before the civil war and is growing by leaps and bounds now, while the
North and East is losing population and industry. Those are facts.
yes, but at what cost was it the richest part of the US?? maybe it was because of all the "FREE LABOR"? The south may have been richer, but it was WRONG.

not that I have any point, I'm just joing the conversation http://spurstalk.com/forums/images/smilies/smispin.gif

Mr. Peabody
03-02-2006, 04:36 PM
No, I just don't think much of you anymore. Disagreeing is one thing, but
cursing or putting ones race down is not my bag. Should I call those that
disagree with me disparaging names. I don't think so. I take it that you are
Hispanic. So should I call you some racist name. Disagree all you want,
but leave the rest of the junk out. Follow you, I don't think so. But I will
post where I want, when I want.

Where did I make a disparaging remark about someone's race? I called Cuellar a "coconut" (mostly as a joke). You took offense to that and said that I was insulting Anglos by calling Cuellar a coconut. :wtf This is from a guy that is always saying that we are too "politically correct." Talk about double standards. :rolleyes

SA210
03-02-2006, 04:41 PM
and someone who doesn't want latinos coming from Mexico.

xrayzebra
03-02-2006, 04:42 PM
yes, but at what cost was it the richest part of the US?? maybe it was because of all the "FREE LABOR"? The south may have been richer, but it was WRONG.

not that I have any point, I'm just joing the conversation http://spurstalk.com/forums/images/smilies/smispin.gif

Yeah, you are correct there. Free labor, not quite, but pretty close. But
remember something. At the time it was an accepted practice. I don't say
I agree with it, because I don't. The US wasn't the only violator of this
practice (slaves). And it still exist to this day. Even in the U.S. There
was a well publicized case of it in Laredo a year or so back and also in
Austin I think it was for the women in cat houses working off so called
debt for being smuggled in from Asia. I am not saying the South was
correct just that they were richer. And by the way Lincoln didn't free
the slaves in the beginning.

Drive Like Jehu
03-02-2006, 04:56 PM
If (I should say when, but whatever) Iraqi civil war breaks out, how will you call the Iraqi situation a success?

Did the civil war in Yugoslavia invalidate the successes achieved by the fall of the iron curtain in Eastern Europe?

Cant_Be_Faded
03-02-2006, 06:48 PM
didn't we have a civil war over here a while back? And wasn't our country better after it?


So you mean after the south was burnt to a crisp and its people starved and homeless jobless etc etc


you mean after that

the people were happy and realized it was a good thing they had civil WAR on their own country's soil?

brilliant! you should go to a&m with that kinda smarts

jochhejaam
03-02-2006, 08:21 PM
The point is they are waiting for the Sunday talk shows to tell them why civil war in Iraq is a good and desirable thing.
And you are the head of what think tank?

ChumpDumper
03-02-2006, 08:31 PM
I don't think civil war is all that great. No one has to tell me that.

How about you?

jochhejaam
03-02-2006, 08:34 PM
I don't think civil war is all that great. No one has to tell me that.

How about you?
You're with me on that one CD.

ChumpDumper
03-02-2006, 08:39 PM
Partition may have been an option if only Sunnis and Shiites were involved. Unfortunately we don't need instability spreading to Turkish Kurdistan.

Nbadan
03-03-2006, 01:36 AM
Partition may have been an option if only Sunnis and Shiites were involved. Unfortunately we don't need instability spreading to Turkish Kurdistan.

The Partition of Iraq maybe an inevitability with Turkey taking the Kurd area, the Sunni forming their own autonomous region, and the Shiites aligning with Iran. Either way, civil war in Iraq will only increase the instability in the whole region drawing Syria, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Pakistan, China, Russia, the U.S. and Israel in an inevitable world war.

MannyIsGod
03-03-2006, 02:14 AM
Did the civil war in Yugoslavia invalidate the successes achieved by the fall of the iron curtain in Eastern Europe?
Did we send in an occupational army into Yugoslavia after the cold war in order to keep a country there regardless of unatural borders?

Regardless of the legitimacy of our initial invasion there, this is more proof of the lack luster unimaginative stragtegy put in place afterwords was just plain horrible.

Iraq needs to be 3 countries, and thats where its going to head.

Nbadan
03-03-2006, 02:32 AM
raq needs to be 3 countries, and thats where its going to head.

IMO that the Kurds and the Shiites can live peacefully together, but the Sunni control the wealth and most of them led Saddam's Armies, so although they are only 20% of the total Iraq population, they are a force that outweighs thier size. They need to be autonomous.