Tony Parker..... [Archive] - SpursTalk.com Forums

GINNNNNNNNNNNNOBILI

03-07-2006, 01:02 AM

amen, i wonder what Chip Engllend is saying right now?

Should be asking for a raise

Spurologist

03-07-2006, 01:09 AM

3 straight jumpers in one stretch. The defense might as well not exist when that is falling for him.

timvp

03-07-2006, 01:10 AM

His release was funky ... but it went in.

That's all that counts :lol

exstatic

03-07-2006, 01:10 AM

3 straight jumpers in one stretch. The defense might as well not exist when that is falling for him.

If he gets that jumper falling consistantly, he could be All NBA one of these years.

SequSpur

03-07-2006, 01:10 AM

Tony Parker in 2 years is going to be unfuckin real.

boutons_

03-07-2006, 01:13 AM

If Tim had finished, we probably would have had 4 guys with 20+ points.

slayermin

03-07-2006, 01:25 AM

If Tim had finished, we probably would have had 4 guys with 20+ points.

and it would have been a blowout. Koab probably wouldn't have had the room to shoot those threes if TD were in there too.

T Park

03-07-2006, 01:55 AM

It was like he flipped a switch.

That jumper had been crap all night, then all of a sudden, nothing but twine.

Love how Tony bagged those shots in CT.

Obstructed_View

03-07-2006, 01:56 AM

Love how Tony bagged those shots in CT.
That's definitely a good sign.

T Park

03-07-2006, 01:58 AM

Tony has always bagged jumpers in clutch time.

Go back and watch some film from 2003, game 6 VS Phoenix.

Bagged shot after shot from the outside in the 4th quarter.

Rocky Balboa

03-07-2006, 09:28 AM

Tony has always bagged jumpers in clutch time.

Go back and watch some film from 2003, game 6 VS Phoenix.

Bagged shot after shot from the outside in the 4th quarter.

This is very true, ya know.

He also got pissed cuz of that foul, and lit em up.

NCaliSpurs

03-07-2006, 09:32 AM

He has also been equally crappy in many crunch time situations. People just tend to remember the bad performances and not the good ones.

RobinsontoDuncan

03-07-2006, 09:34 AM

Wait, Timvp are you saying his shot was the old Parker shot, not the new one he is working on with Chip?

Extra Stout

03-07-2006, 09:36 AM

He has also been equally crappy in many crunch time situations. People just tend to remember the bad performances and not the good ones.
In past years, the knock on Parker was his inconsistency.

This year, there has been no inconsistency. 55% shooting is ridiculous.

batman2883

03-07-2006, 09:51 AM

Man forget about that, how about Manu catching fire in the third hitting like 4 straight three pointers...Manu=The fucking man

1Parker1

03-07-2006, 09:56 AM

Man forget about that, how about Manu catching fire in the third hitting like 4 straight three pointers...Manu=The fucking man

Stick to the Club

:lol

Spurminator

03-07-2006, 10:26 AM

If he gets that jumper falling consistantly, he could be All NBA one of these years.

I think he will be THIS year...

ShoogarBear

03-07-2006, 10:31 AM

I think he will be THIS year...

Gonna be close. But I think if you look at the Spurs having a top 2-3 record with the two "bigger" stars subpar all year, that tips the balance for Third-Team in his favor.

The other interesting question is whether Tim gets the inertia First-Team, or gets the Second-Team he deserves.

Joepa

03-07-2006, 10:36 AM

The only thing about Tony is he needs to change his name to something manly.

Like Frank. Or Biff. Or Maximus.

MAXIMUS PARKER FOR THREEEEEE!!!!!

pache100

03-07-2006, 10:41 AM

The only thing about Tony is he needs to change his name to something manly.

Like Frank. Or Biff. Or Maximus.

MAXIMUS PARKER FOR THREEEEEE!!!!!

Tony is a more "manly" (what the hell does that mean???) name then TIM. I don't think either of them feels their masculinity challenged because of their name.

smeagol

03-07-2006, 11:02 AM

Paging Brewski . . . paging Brewski . . .

1Parker1

03-07-2006, 11:06 AM

Tony is a more "manly" (what the hell does that mean???) name then TIM. I don't think either of them feels their masculinity challenged because of their name.

I think he was being sarcastic.

pache100

03-07-2006, 11:08 AM

I think he was being sarcastic.

I think so, too.

batman2883

03-07-2006, 11:25 AM

I think Tony should go by his first name William

SAGambler

03-07-2006, 11:55 AM

If he gets that jumper falling consistantly, he could be All NBA one of these years.

I think it was Sean that made the point a few nights back, that now in practice they are working on Tony's 3 point shot. As he put it. If he gets that down, he will become totally unstoppable and unguardable.

I certainly think the Spurs were indeed lucky to pick Tony up as late as they did.

He's turned out to be more than they could ever have hoped for.

NCaliSpurs

03-07-2006, 02:50 PM

He's turned out to be more than they could ever have hoped for.

Well, they hoped for $66 Million worth.

And it appears they may have just gotten it.

However, factoring his initial rookie deal (3 years at <= 1M ?) you are getting 9 years for about $70 million. That is less than 8 million a year.

Quite a bargain for a young, experienced All-Star Point Guard.

Kori Ellis

03-08-2006, 03:15 PM

SenorSpur

03-08-2006, 03:23 PM

I think it was Sean that made the point a few nights back, that now in practice they are working on Tony's 3 point shot. As he put it. If he gets that down, he will become totally unstoppable and unguardable.

I certainly think the Spurs were indeed lucky to pick Tony up as late as they did.

He's turned out to be more than they could ever have hoped for.

Anybody still feel snubbed that JKidd didn't sign with the Spurs.

We actually dodged a bullet IMO

ShoogarBear

03-08-2006, 03:25 PM

The Spurs' record with Tony Parker in the lineup is 273-100 (.732). The only players since the 1970 season to play at least 300 games and have a higher winning percentage were Magic Johnson (.740) and Larry Bird (.736).
That's impressive. But even more impressive is I'm guessing those were Magic and Bird's numbers for their entire career.

Parkersgirl9

03-08-2006, 10:09 PM

yup i always had faith in my boy....

Dunkman21

03-08-2006, 10:17 PM

Tony Parker is the next Iverson without the shitty attitude and poor shot selection.
He'll end up better than Iverson. He has plenty more years to prove that

SequSpur

03-08-2006, 10:29 PM

Iverson is/has/will always be a fukkin stud.

I seriously doubt Parker gets on that level.

T Park

03-08-2006, 10:39 PM

I dunno.

If Parker was as selfish as Iverson, and had been brought up in a great basketball college like Georgetown, I don't doubt hed be as good.

exstatic

03-08-2006, 10:42 PM

Iverson is/has/will always be a fukkin stud.

I seriously doubt Parker gets on that level.

You're right, Sequ. I don't ever see Tony on the level of 40% FGs for a season. :lol