PDA

View Full Version : Dallas (54-16) at Detroit (55-14)



Pages : 1 [2]

1Parker1
03-28-2006, 10:42 PM
I love you,
You love me,
We're a happy family,
with a great big hug,
and a kiss from me to you,
Won't you say you love me TOO!

I love you,
You love me,
We're best friends like friends should be,
With a great big hug,
And a kiss from me to you,
Won't you say you love me too


**Ahem, On second thought, maybe you guys should stick with the NBA forum. :angel :lol

mavsfan1000
03-28-2006, 10:54 PM
Mavs would've won if Howard and Harris were playing.

DisgruntledLionFan#54,927
03-28-2006, 10:57 PM
Mavs would have won if Dirk didn't disappear down the stretch...

Stack and VH were clutch, Dirk not so much...

mavsfan1000
03-28-2006, 10:58 PM
Stack choked. What are you talking about? Dirk would've shot the ball if given the ball by Stackhole.

ABDENOUR POWER
03-28-2006, 11:01 PM
http://www.webdelsol.com/The_Potomac/issue2/crybaby.jpg

NallhOnesTy
03-28-2006, 11:01 PM
win=win

stop makin excuses mavs fans

jochhejaam
03-28-2006, 11:09 PM
Stack choked. What are you talking about? Dirk would've shot the ball if given the ball by Stackhole.
What did you think of Prince's masterful block on Dirk in crunch time?

Chauncey > Dirk

DisgruntledLionFan#54,927
03-28-2006, 11:10 PM
Stack choked. What are you talking about? Dirk would've shot the ball if given the ball by Stackhole.

Maybe you don't expect much of Dirk in crunch time anymore. I understand...

mavsfan1000
03-28-2006, 11:11 PM
What did you think of Prince's masterful block on Dirk in crunch time?

Chauncey > Dirk
What did you think for Stackhouse's masterful choke. Even when Stackhouse plays well he finds a way to hurt Dallas at the end. Stackhouse=most selfish player ever.

T.F. Storm
03-28-2006, 11:12 PM
What did you think of Prince's masterful block on Dirk in crunch time?

Chauncey > Dirk

I jumped out of my seat when Tay blocked that shot. It was like the perfect ending to an amazing ball game.

JamStone
03-28-2006, 11:13 PM
Mavs would've won if Howard and Harris were playing.

:baby


Ok, we'll start a petition to the NBA to officially give Dallas the win since they would have won with Howard and Harris.

jochhejaam
03-28-2006, 11:14 PM
What did you think for Stackhouse's masterful choke. Even when Stackhouse plays well he finds a way to hurt Dallas at the end. Stackhouse=most selfish player ever.
It seems the game fell apart for the Mavs after the altercation between Delfino and Stack. Next time down court Rip knocked the ball off of Stack's leg and the rest is history.

Stack and Van Horn did keep you in the game though.

JamStone
03-28-2006, 11:15 PM
What did you think for Stackhouse's masterful choke. Even when Stackhouse plays well he finds a way to hurt Dallas at the end. Stackhouse=most selfish player ever.


Stack had a couple bad turnovers and a couple bad shots down the stretch.

But, 11-18 for 25 points.

Dallas is blown out without Stack shooting so well most of the game.

Vinnie_Johnson
03-28-2006, 11:21 PM
Stack played great until it's crunch time or playoffs that's his MO.

Vinnie_Johnson
03-28-2006, 11:36 PM
The Mavs hardly played their best. You should watch the mavs with Devin Harris at the point guard with Josh Howard's slashing ability. :lol

Would of could have should have just get ready to go fishing once the playoffs start. :elephant

Vizzini
03-28-2006, 11:39 PM
Stackhouse=most selfish player ever.

Yep, and the reason why Joe Dumars shipped him away for Rip.

T Park
03-28-2006, 11:44 PM
BTW Way to go Dirk and Avery, by fighting on the bench.

Really professional there assclowns.

Dunc
03-29-2006, 12:18 AM
LOL at the "See you in the Finals, DUNCAN" sign.

Lol, the guy with that sign was like two rows behind me. That's awesome. What a hell of a game that was. Just got home a couple minutes ago and my throat and palms still hurt, lol.

Pistons < Spurs
03-29-2006, 12:21 AM
Just got home a couple minutes ago and my throat and palms still hurt, lol.


LMAO That doesn't sound good.......

Dunc
03-29-2006, 12:24 AM
LMAO That doesn't sound good.......

:lmao

Lol, don't judge me man :D

StylisticS
03-29-2006, 12:27 AM
win=win

stop makin excuses mavs fans
Mavs fan. He's the only one.

nkdlunch
03-29-2006, 12:36 AM
stackhouse is a thug wannabe. hate that bitch. Mavs are lost if they require him and Vanhorn to win.

SequSpur
03-29-2006, 12:39 AM
ok,, this is now nba forum bait.

get rid of this shit.

bdubya
03-29-2006, 12:55 AM
For some reason I think Delfino threads would pop up daily....

...like nips in a cool midwest breeze...

Darrin
03-29-2006, 01:53 AM
stackhouse is a thug wannabe. hate that bitch. Mavs are lost if they require him and Vanhorn to win.

Why is everyone so hard on Stack all the time? The guy was the sixth man when asked to be (He should've started over Dumars in 1998 and 1999), he was the side-kick to Hill when asked (Only Kobe/Shaq scored more points than Stackhouse 23.4 and Hill 25.6 in 2000), he jacked up 25 shots a night because it was the only way to win (29.8 ppg in 2001, the highest in franchise history), and he backed off when Carlisle asked him to (21.1 ppg in 2002).

His 'posse' has a run-in with Allen Iverson in 1998, and he's a punk. He makes comments that Jordan makes 30 million, so why can't Stack re-sign for 15 a year in 1999, and he's a punk for the rest of his career.

I can name 5 game-winning shots off the top of my head. I can name 4 other game-tying shots that Stack made. When he got to Detroit, he couldn't pass and he couldn't do anything but get to the rack.

So let's recap: He was stupid when he was younger, and it haunts him to this day. No matter what the role, he may have bitched, but he went on the court and did it.

When people bring up the fact he's played with Allen Iverson, Grant Hill, Michael Jordan, and Dirk Nowitzki he always pipes up and says: "What about Ben Wallace?"

Jerry Stackhouse wasn't a maximum player. But when no one wanted to come to Detroit, when Cliff Robinson and Jon Barry had to be talked down from the ledge because they went from contending teams in Phoenix and Sacramento to the doledrums of Detroit, guess who stuck by the Pistons? He didn't demand a trade or quit like Carter did in Toronto, or McGrady in Orlando. Who still praises Rick Sund (who traded for him) and Joe Dumars for believing in the player he could be? Jerry Stackhouse.

He is gone because he wanted a big payday, and because the Pistons' potential backcourt of Chauncey Billups and Jerry Stackhouse wouldn't have worked; they are too similar. The Hamilton/Billups backcourt worked because Rip isn't constantly trying to get into the lane like Stack. He is a better mid-range shooter than Billups, and where both Stack and C-Bill thrive is off the dribble in the paint and at the 3-point line. It just wouldn't have worked, but Billups was needed because Chucky Atkins couldn't continue to be the starting point guard. He couldn't defend larger guards, his shot was streaky, and making Stack the initiator of the offense was problematic because he just doesn't have the physical skills to see the play develop, and too often his man knows where the ball is going.

He was, for about 5 seasons, the offensive machine for the Pistons. I'm not saying he's a great player or should be starting over Josh Howard or Adrian Griffin. 6th man on a contending team seems the perfect place for him. But the guy is tough, he hates losing, he's a great singer, and has been working in the area of diabetes research as long as he's been in the league.

He was the opposite of Grant Hill in almost every conciveable way. Their games, on-court mentality, and the way they reacted in pressure situations. Who was the first guy to say "I want Rasheed to be a Piston. He's struggling in Portland, and he'd love it here. Just don't trade Ben."

Mr. Jerry Stackhouse in December, 2001.

Darrin
03-29-2006, 02:03 AM
What did you think for Stackhouse's masterful choke. Even when Stackhouse plays well he finds a way to hurt Dallas at the end. Stackhouse=most selfish player ever.

He's still a Piston at heart.

FreshPrince22
03-29-2006, 02:04 AM
Stack is a punk because he continues with his hardass antics. Every time I turn on a game with him in it he's starting some shit with random people over nothing. It's an old act.

Darrin
03-29-2006, 02:06 AM
Stack is a punk because he continues with his hardass antics. Every time I turn on a game with him in it he's starting some shit with random people over nothing. It's an old act.

Some people say the same thing about the person in your signature.

FreshPrince22
03-29-2006, 02:12 AM
Some people say the same thing about the person in your signature.

Are you kidding me? How many times have you seen Sheed have to get seperated from a player for picking a fight as a Piston? Once? Maybe? Stack does that shit every damn game.

http://espn-i.starwave.com/media/apphoto/DTP10703290351.jpg

He's a PUNK.

Darrin
03-29-2006, 02:32 AM
Are you kidding me? How many times have you seen Sheed have to get seperated from a player for picking a fight as a Piston? Once? Maybe? Stack does that shit every damn game.

http://espn-i.starwave.com/media/apphoto/DTP10703290351.jpg

He's a PUNK.

Wallace's critics say his battles aren't with the players, apparently.

Are you telling me you wouldn't like to have Stack back as the sixth man (if money isn't an issue)?

FreshPrince22
03-29-2006, 02:51 AM
Wallace's critics say his battles aren't with the players, apparently.

Are you telling me you wouldn't like to have Stack back as the sixth man (if money isn't an issue)?

Ask Mavs Fans. Most of them seem to hate him.

Darrin
03-29-2006, 03:28 AM
The Pistons not only came from behind, they won me $400 through V bookie. :)

mavsfan1000
03-29-2006, 03:28 AM
I hate his game. I don't know about him as a person but shooting 30% is not a type of player you would want on your team.

Darrin
03-29-2006, 03:39 AM
I hate his game. I don't know about him as a person but shooting 30% is not a type of player you would want on your team.

He's a bench player. I'm not asking him to be a number one option, although he has been one. Billups only shoots .420 from the field.

They said a lot of similar things about "s"Corliss Williamson. He can't D up anyone, he's too small for the post, and he's not going to do anything for you if he's not scoring. None of those things changed all that much, but in the minutes he was on the floor, he was agressive with the basketball and brought energy. Being a sixth man for the Pistons is a different prospect than being a sixth starter on another team. All he'd be asked to do is stay agressive, play within himself (something Stack has struggled with), and make plays. I think that's a role he could fill on this team. I'd love to see McDyess and Stack fill out the Pistons 7 man rotation.

What bothers me is the injuries. He's had bands on his knees since his 4th season in Detroit. He's had multiple groin strains, and he's missed a lot of time since leaving.

woainba
03-29-2006, 03:41 AM
哈哈,我是马刺密
it is mean: i am a fan of spurs

mavsfan1000
03-29-2006, 03:58 AM
哈哈,我是马刺密
it is mean: i am a fan of spurs
:wtf

JamStone
03-29-2006, 11:59 AM
Why is everyone so hard on Stack all the time? The guy was the sixth man when asked to be (He should've started over Dumars in 1998 and 1999), he was the side-kick to Hill when asked (Only Kobe/Shaq scored more points than Stackhouse 23.4 and Hill 25.6 in 2000), he jacked up 25 shots a night because it was the only way to win (29.8 ppg in 2001, the highest in franchise history), and he backed off when Carlisle asked him to (21.1 ppg in 2002).

His 'posse' has a run-in with Allen Iverson in 1998, and he's a punk. He makes comments that Jordan makes 30 million, so why can't Stack re-sign for 15 a year in 1999, and he's a punk for the rest of his career.

I can name 5 game-winning shots off the top of my head. I can name 4 other game-tying shots that Stack made. When he got to Detroit, he couldn't pass and he couldn't do anything but get to the rack.

So let's recap: He was stupid when he was younger, and it haunts him to this day. No matter what the role, he may have bitched, but he went on the court and did it.

When people bring up the fact he's played with Allen Iverson, Grant Hill, Michael Jordan, and Dirk Nowitzki he always pipes up and says: "What about Ben Wallace?"

Jerry Stackhouse wasn't a maximum player. But when no one wanted to come to Detroit, when Cliff Robinson and Jon Barry had to be talked down from the ledge because they went from contending teams in Phoenix and Sacramento to the doledrums of Detroit, guess who stuck by the Pistons? He didn't demand a trade or quit like Carter did in Toronto, or McGrady in Orlando. Who still praises Rick Sund (who traded for him) and Joe Dumars for believing in the player he could be? Jerry Stackhouse.

He is gone because he wanted a big payday, and because the Pistons' potential backcourt of Chauncey Billups and Jerry Stackhouse wouldn't have worked; they are too similar. The Hamilton/Billups backcourt worked because Rip isn't constantly trying to get into the lane like Stack. He is a better mid-range shooter than Billups, and where both Stack and C-Bill thrive is off the dribble in the paint and at the 3-point line. It just wouldn't have worked, but Billups was needed because Chucky Atkins couldn't continue to be the starting point guard. He couldn't defend larger guards, his shot was streaky, and making Stack the initiator of the offense was problematic because he just doesn't have the physical skills to see the play develop, and too often his man knows where the ball is going.

He was, for about 5 seasons, the offensive machine for the Pistons. I'm not saying he's a great player or should be starting over Josh Howard or Adrian Griffin. 6th man on a contending team seems the perfect place for him. But the guy is tough, he hates losing, he's a great singer, and has been working in the area of diabetes research as long as he's been in the league.

He was the opposite of Grant Hill in almost every conciveable way. Their games, on-court mentality, and the way they reacted in pressure situations. Who was the first guy to say "I want Rasheed to be a Piston. He's struggling in Portland, and he'd love it here. Just don't trade Ben."

Mr. Jerry Stackhouse in December, 2001.




Who choked in the game 5 of the first round of the 2002 playoffs against the Toronto Raptors, only to be bailed out by Ben Wallace and Corliss Williamson?

Mr. Jerry Stackhouse.

Who choked again in game 5 of the second round of the 2002 playoffs against the Boston Celtics in an elimination game on his own homecourt to lose the series as the higher seed?

Mr. Jerry Stackhouse.

After being traded to Washington, who lied about not being called by Joe Dumars about the trade?

Mr. Jerry Stackhouse.

Who choked a woman out of anger?

Mr. Jerry Stackhouse.



Stack is not a bad guy. He was actually good for the Detroit community. And, he's definitely a talent. But, on and off the court, he deserves a lot of his criticisms.

DarkReign
03-29-2006, 12:07 PM
Helluva game. Mavs100000000001 or whatever can make all the excuses he wants. Stack and KVH going nuts like they did certainly balanced that game out just fine.

Besides, injuries are apart of the game. Dont blame the opposition, blame your training staff.

Darrin
03-29-2006, 12:38 PM
Who choked in the game 5 of the first round of the 2002 playoffs against the Toronto Raptors, only to be bailed out by Ben Wallace and Corliss Williamson?

Mr. Jerry Stackhouse.

He shot 1-9, that is true. The one field goal was the game-winner. You're forgetting that to get a 2-0 lead, Stackhouse had to hit three 3-pointers in the final two minutes of game two.


Who choked again in game 5 of the second round of the 2002 playoffs against the Boston Celtics in an elimination game on his own homecourt to lose the series as the higher seed?

You've got me there. Stackhouse had a horrific last game in Detroit. 8 points on 3-18 shooting, 5 rebounds, and 5 assists. Guess what? The dude said he failed his team after the game. All the venom he spits at others, he was as equally as pissed off at himself. When Mike Curry goes for 15 points, Corliss gives them 17 off the bench, Atkins breaks out of series long slump for 22, and you're two leading scorers go for 12 points on 5-28 shooting, it's a bad game.

The Celtics were a bad matchup. The Pistons stuggled to beat them all season, whether they had a 20 point lead or not. Their two wins, both at the Palace, were single-digit affairs. The Pistons rallied from a 17-point 2nd-half deficit to beat them the first time, and couldn't sustain a 15-point lead and needed some key mistakes by the Celtics to beat them the second time.

Let's not forget the Mr. Jerry Stackhouse hit the potential game-winner in Boston over 3 defenders, but it was one-tenth of a second too late. The Pistons would've gone up 2-1, and it's a completely different series. The Pistons wouldn't win a road playoff game under Rick Carlisle, until game six vs. Orlando in 2002-03. They were 2-8 on the road overall. The Pistons didn't know how to win a seven-game series, and that is why they were down 3-1 to Orlando in 2002-03.

You're forgetting that Stackhouse had a damn-near triple-double in the only win in that series with Boston - 26 points, 11 rebounds, and 8 assists.

And do you not remember Chucky Atkins as he struggled to guard Kenny Anderson? 13.8 ppg, 3.6 rpg, and 4.4 apg versus 8.0 ppg, 1.8 rpg, 3.8 apg. Anderson had one game in single-digits, and it was in a Boston blowout. Chucky Atkins didn't score more than 5 points in a single game until game five (22 points).

Anderson routinely broke Atkins down, got into the lane and passed out to one of the floor spreaders - Delk, Rogers, Pierce, and Walker. He was the third option the Celtics had struggled to find all season.

Two playoff inexperienced teams going into the playoffs with 50 and 49 wins? Both failing to win a road playoff game in the first round? Yeah, it was a big upset.


After being traded to Washington, who lied about not being called by Joe Dumars about the trade?

Mr. Jerry Stackhouse.

I honestly don't remember this.


Who choked a woman out of anger?

Mr. Jerry Stackhouse.

Charges were dropped, were they not?

mavsfan1000
03-29-2006, 02:48 PM
Stackhouse was always overhyped. He has made every team worse that he's been on. He is a black hole also. At the end of games he thinks he has to take over the game and it cost Dallas last night. Even on his best games he finds a way to hurt Dallas. He is a poor shooter, turnover prone, and a black hole. Why any team would want him on their team I wouldn't know.

DisgruntledLionFan#54,927
03-29-2006, 03:16 PM
Stackhouse was always overhyped. He has made every team worse that he's been on. He is a black hole also. At the end of games he thinks he has to take over the game and it cost Dallas last night. Even on his best games he finds a way to hurt Dallas. He is a poor shooter, turnover prone, and a black hole. Why any team would want him on their team I wouldn't know.


Isn't he a cancer in the lockerroom as well?


Didn't he punch Laettner over a few hundred dollars on the Pistons team plane?

Darrin
03-29-2006, 04:06 PM
Stackhouse was always overhyped.

He's been perceived as a team cancer since his second season in the league. How can he be overhyped? What I know is that Stackhouse got this team further as a leader (in two years) than Grant Hill ever did (in six).


He has made every team worse that he's been on.

Well, let's put you're theory to the test.

Philadelphia 76ers:
Pre-Stackhouse:
1992-93: 26-56
1993-94: 25-57
1994-95: 24-58
Total: 75-171 (.304)

With Stackhouse:
1995-96: 16-66
1996-97: 22-60
1997-98: 6-16
Total: 44-142 (.236)


Detroit Pistons
Pre-Stackhouse:
1993-94: 20-62
1994-95: 28-54
1995-96: 46-36, 0-3
1996-97: 54-28, 2-3
1997-98: 11-14
Total: 159-194 (.450), 2-6 (.250)

With Stackhouse:
1997-98: 26-31
1998-99: 29-21, 2-3
1999-00: 42-40, 0-3
2000-01: 32-50
2001-02: 50-32, 4-6
Total: 179-174 (.507), 6-12 (.333)


Washington Wizards:
Pre-Stackhouse
2000-01: 19-63
2001-02: 37-45
Total: 56-108 (.341)

With Stackhouse
2002-03: 37-45
2003-04: 25-57 - missed career-high 56 games.
Total: 62-102 (.378)


Dallas Mavericks:
Pre-Stackhouse:
2002-03: 60-22, 10-10
2003-04: 52-30, 1-4
Total: 112-52 (.682), 11-14 (.440)

With Stackhouse
2004-05: 58-24, 6-7
2005-06: 54-17
Total: 112-41 (.730), 6-7 (.461)

I think the only argument you can make against Stackhouse with this record, is that he has a marginal impact on how the franchise performs.


At the end of games he thinks he has to take over the game and it cost Dallas last night.

Taking over a game is not something I believe he can do. I don't think he's an initiator of the offense; he's not going to run off 12-straight points at the end of games. In 1999, he hit the game-winning shot over Utah on national TV. In 2000, He sent the Pistons into overtime vs. the Miami Heat on opening night, he sent the Pistons into overtime vs. the Atlanta Hawks with a 3, he scored 6-straight points to pull the Pistons within one vs. the Blazers. Hill goes one-on-one on on the last possession, and the Pistons lose the game. In 2001, he set a career-high 44 points in a opening night win vs. the Raptors. In 2002, he hit the game-winning runner in Charlotte that gave the Pistons a Central Division lead, he hit the series-winning jumper over the Raptors in game 5 of the first round.

My point is that Stackhouse has been clutch, and people don't seem to realize the guy has grown up a lot.


Even on his best games he finds a way to hurt Dallas. He is a poor shooter, turnover prone, and a black hole.

If he doesn't pass the ball to Prince yesterday, are you still writing this post? I saw three-straight possessions last night of Dallas mental mistakes, and only one of them had to do with Stack.

LEONARD
03-29-2006, 05:01 PM
Stack is fine as a 6th man...he should be the 4th option at crunch time though...

Dirk
Terry
Howard (when healthy)
Stack

I don't know why he's taking such a beating. The guy has been pretty solid with the Mavs and he hasn't had any off the court problems that I can remember....

bdubya
03-29-2006, 05:05 PM
Isn't he a cancer in the lockerroom as well?


Didn't he punch Laettner over a few hundred dollars on the Pistons team plane?

Isn't there some sort of "good guy, not a lockerroom cancer" certification that you get when you punch Laettner?

jochhejaam
03-29-2006, 05:53 PM
Stackhouse was always overhyped. He has made every team worse that he's been on. He is a black hole also. At the end of games he thinks he has to take over the game and it cost Dallas last night. Even on his best games he finds a way to hurt Dallas. He is a poor shooter, turnover prone, and a black hole. Why any team would want him on their team I wouldn't know.
Avery Johnson obviously doesn't think of him as a black hole or he wouldn't be with the team. I would say he's a better evaluator of talent than you, yes?

mavsfan1000
03-29-2006, 06:24 PM
Avery Johnson obviously doesn't think of him as a black hole or he wouldn't be with the team. I would say he's a better evaluator of talent than you, yes?
I watch every game the mavs play and so far Stackhouse has hurt Dallas more than helped them despite the record. Avery realizes he has to baby Stackhouse or he will throw a fit in the lockerroom so he has no choice but to play the Stackhole. Daniels isn't that great but he sure doesn't throw bricks like Stackhouse does. Maybe Stackhouse was clutch before but he has also choked. He is the one always taking the shot so he is bound to be clutch at one point. He is constantly shooting around 41% for his career in the regular season and 36% in the playoffs. He doesn't rebound well, he has a lot of turnovers, and he has a lot of defensive lapses. That move by Dumars in which Stackhouse got traded for Hamilton was brilliant.

ChumpDumper
03-29-2006, 06:40 PM
Avery Johnson obviously doesn't think of him as a black hole or he wouldn't be with the team. I would say he's a better evaluator of talent than you, yes?AJ didn't trade for him.

FreshPrince22
03-29-2006, 06:41 PM
AJ didn't trade for him.

But he DOES control the minutes.

ChumpDumper
03-29-2006, 06:44 PM
Sure, but who else is he going to play at this point? It's odd that most teams get better after sending Stack away.

jochhejaam
03-29-2006, 06:53 PM
AJ didn't trade for him.
He's a better evaluator than you too CD. :)

"A black hole" is extreme.

jochhejaam
03-29-2006, 06:57 PM
Sure, but who else is he going to play at this point? It's odd that most teams get better after sending Stack away.
Dallas's win percentage has improved each of the last 2 years since aquiring Stack.

Oddities abound.

mavsfan1000
03-29-2006, 07:08 PM
If Stack isn't a black hole than who is?

ChumpDumper
03-29-2006, 10:11 PM
Dallas's win percentage has improved each of the last 2 years since aquiring Stack.

Oddities abound.RIF.

Just wait til he leaves the team.

Dynasty.

ReppinTheD
03-29-2006, 10:15 PM
lol didn't know where to post this, and din't want to stat a whole new thread because of it:

http://us.news2.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/ap/20060330/capt.pxc10403300222.pistons_76ers_basketball_pxc10 4.jpg

wow

jochhejaam
03-29-2006, 10:47 PM
RIF.

Just wait til he leaves the team.

Dynasty.
You try to make it sound like Stack's an enigma and I pointed out the flaw in your arguement.

<mental note: simplify future correspondence with CD>

Darrin
03-30-2006, 04:11 AM
Sure, but who else is he going to play at this point? It's odd that most teams get better after sending Stack away.

That's because he sucks so badly that noone will trade any talent for him. For instance, Theo Ratliff (Philadelphia), Rip Hamilton (Detroit), and Antawn Jamison (Washington). All those guys were integral to later team success. It's not like he's been dumped overboard for washed-up scrubs.

Also, when he's traded, there's an equally capable player at his position. For instance Allen Iverson in Philadelphia, Rip Hamilton in Detroit, and Larry Hughes in Washington.

ChumpDumper
03-30-2006, 02:28 PM
You try to make it sound like Stack's an enigma and I pointed out the flaw in your arguement.

<mental note: simplify future correspondence with CD>The flaw is yours because I'm talking about when Stack leaves a team.

And I already dumbed it down for you. You're hopeless.

Winnipeg_Spur
03-30-2006, 03:17 PM
That's because he sucks so badly that noone will trade any talent for him. For instance, Theo Ratliff (Philadelphia), Rip Hamilton (Detroit), and Antawn Jamison (Washington). All those guys were integral to later team success. It's not like he's been dumped overboard for washed-up scrubs.

Also, when he's traded, there's an equally capable player at his position. For instance Allen Iverson in Philadelphia, Rip Hamilton in Detroit, and Larry Hughes in Washington.

I'm pretty sure the trade with Washington was mostly for the 5th pick in the draft. Stackhouse was just thrown in to make the salaries work.

v2000
03-30-2006, 03:23 PM
Stackhouse previously had a problem with taking too many shots, and a lot of poor shots at that. He is a very talented player, but had a bad attitude. However, he has really matured and grown since coming to Dallas, and has done a hell of a job for the Mavericks. Lately, he has struggled, but over the past couple games, he has played a LOT better. and until we had all those injuries, I think Dallas went like 25-3 since he had came back from injury. He is an important piece of the Mavs.

jochhejaam
03-30-2006, 05:41 PM
The flaw is yours because I'm talking about when Stack leaves a team.

And I already dumbed it down for you. You're hopeless.

And my point was that he also "joins" teams and been an asset.

If a post doesn't deal precisely with your's you're unable to comprehend it and that's my flaw? :lol

I'll make it a point to spoon feed you baby bites in the future.

Perfect10
03-30-2006, 06:56 PM
Did everyone hear the Sheed quote about the Delfino/Stackhouse skirmish?

Hilarious and classic Sheed.

"Carlos ain't no punk. They kidnap people where he comes from." :lol :lol

v2000
03-30-2006, 07:18 PM
Did everyone hear the Sheed quote about the Delfino/Stackhouse skirmish?

Hilarious and classic Sheed.

"Carlos ain't no punk. They kidnap people where he comes from." :lol :lol
yea, but he shouldnt go to far, or he will get punked by stackhouse. that guy can fight. remember when he beat the shit out of Jeff Hornacek?

ChumpDumper
03-30-2006, 08:28 PM
And my point was that he also "joins" teams and been an asset.

If a post doesn't deal precisely with your's you're unable to comprehend it and that's my flaw? :lol

I'll make it a point to spoon feed you baby bites in the future.Your post has nothing to do with mine. I know you are too stupid to understand, and it's impossible make your dumb ass understand that.

You are a flaw.

Stack is a nice little role player who was deluded into thinking he was a superstar by greedy agents and stupid GMs. Almost as stupid as you.

jochhejaam
03-30-2006, 08:55 PM
you are too stupid...your dumb ass...You are a flaw...Almost as stupid as you.

:wow In the word of Keith Jackson; Whoa Nellie!! :lol

Forget the spoon fed baby bites you'll get nothing but formula :lol

p.s. Double up on the meds

ChumpDumper
03-30-2006, 09:01 PM
I retract the GM statement - he's getting paid about what he should.

I guess he's to blame for the delusion then. No one overrates him more than him, maybe you.

I have no advice for you - no reason to bother.

Dunc
03-31-2006, 12:42 AM
Did everyone hear the Sheed quote about the Delfino/Stackhouse skirmish?

Hilarious and classic Sheed.

"Carlos ain't no punk. They kidnap people where he comes from." :lol :lol

Yeah, that was absolute classic there. Loved it, lol