View Full Version : Where the hell is the bash Barry thread!?!?
Dre_7
05-06-2006, 04:30 AM
Spurs were up 20 with around a minute to go and he shot a three!
Pablo Escobar
05-06-2006, 04:33 AM
thats all he shoots so its ok
polandprzem
05-06-2006, 04:43 AM
Dre there was one but the moderators erased it ;)
Dre_7
05-06-2006, 04:46 AM
Dre there was one but the moderators erased it ;)
Oh, I havent been home all day til now.
MannyIsGod
05-06-2006, 05:07 AM
Man, I understand you bust a nut everytime Nazr pumpfakes, but these are 2 totally different situations.
picnroll
05-06-2006, 09:43 AM
2006 Playoffs ADJ. FG%
1 Brent Barry, SAS .743
2 Tim Thomas, PHO .646
3 Bonzi Wells, SAC .638
4 A. McDyess, DET .632
5 R. Wallace, DET .627
6 A. Nocioni, CHI .619
7 Tim Duncan, SAS .612
8 S. O'Neal, MIA .607
9 Kwame Brown, LAL .582
10 Steve Nash, PHO .574
ploto
05-06-2006, 09:45 AM
2006 Playoffs ADJ. FG%
1 Brent Barry, SAS .743
2 Tim Thomas, PHO .646
3 Bonzi Wells, SAC .638
4 A. McDyess, DET .632
5 R. Wallace, DET .627
6 A. Nocioni, CHI .619
7 Tim Duncan, SAS .612
8 S. O'Neal, MIA .607
9 Kwame Brown, LAL .582
10 Steve Nash, PHO .574
OWNED!!
Dre_7
05-06-2006, 04:21 PM
OWNED!!
So youre not gonna write a paragraph about how classless Barry was like you did for Nazr?
ShoogarBear
05-06-2006, 04:25 PM
No, because for ploto "classless" means "might be taking minutes from the great All-Star, Radoslav".
~Sweetmelody~
05-06-2006, 04:27 PM
Spurs were up 20 with around a minute to go and he shot a three!
Could it be that the first one was bad since it was a blowout AND it was the first game. That would give them reason to come out and play with vengeance, as opposed to being the last game.
ShoogarBear
05-06-2006, 04:30 PM
So then it has nothing to do with being classy, only on whether it might fire up a team you still have to close out?
At least that's a plausible answer.
Spurminator
05-06-2006, 04:58 PM
The difference is that if teams find out Nazr has a credible 3-point shot it might drive his price up. :lol
Aggie Hoopsfan
05-06-2006, 05:07 PM
Look at it this way, with Nazr stroking a three, maybe some dumbass in the next couple of rounds will bite on a Nazr pump fake at the three point line. And it'll probably be _irk. :lol
clubalien
05-06-2006, 05:10 PM
3 Bonzi Wells, SAC .638
Just like to point out he is better than tim and shaq Someone will be getting a huge contract and we can hope it isn't nazr
Despot
05-06-2006, 05:12 PM
No series against the Kings is truly over until you hit a three on them in the final minute of the game, it would have been like the series never finshed, it would not have been right.
Despot
05-06-2006, 05:14 PM
I may be mistaken, but didn't Barry actually make that three with 2:00 - 2:30 left to play?
Edit: Checked, it was with 1:10 left
T Park
05-06-2006, 05:35 PM
1 minute left as opposed to 20 seconds left.
last game of a clinching series, as opposed to the first game wich could possibly piss off the opponenet.
Why the fuck is it so difficult?
ShoogarBear
05-06-2006, 05:37 PM
So you agree it has nothing to do with class. If that was game 5, Barry would have been guilty of the same thing as Nazr.
T Park
05-06-2006, 05:51 PM
Uh no.
It does have to do with class.
Class, not showing up and pissing off the opponent.
Barry was shooting within the offense last night with over a minute left.
Mohammed chucked up a 3 in a 31 point game 1 blowout that all he had to do was hold the bal and finish the game.
Big difference.
But typical shortsightedness from everyone here that loves to point out hypocrisy on the board.
Uh no.
It does have to do with class.
Class, not showing up and pissing off the opponent.
Barry was shooting within the offense last night with over a minute left.
Mohammed chucked up a 3 in a 31 point game 1 blowout that all he had to do was hold the bal and finish the game.
Big difference.
But typical shortsightedness from everyone here that loves to point out hypocrisy on the board.
It would have been a shot clock violation. :smokin
ShoogarBear
05-06-2006, 05:57 PM
The only one being hypocritical is you, T Park.
The situations were the same. You apply one bogus standard in one instance, and another bogus standard in the other. Not surprising.
T Park
05-06-2006, 06:02 PM
The situations were totally different.
Sorry taht you can't see that.
Not surprising.
Not surprising you can't see the difference either.
T Park
05-06-2006, 06:03 PM
It would have been a shot clock violation
Exactly.
Theyve done it in the past, and pop has told the team to hold the ball.
Mohammed being dumber than dirt though, couldn't understand that.
Exactly.
Theyve done it in the past, and pop has told the team to hold the ball.
Mohammed being dumber than dirt though, couldn't understand that.
You have no proof, so your statement has no validity at all.
snowboarder
05-06-2006, 07:24 PM
There's a diff. and yes i say it is class
nazr is a CENTER, shooting a 3 with what, 10+ secs left on the shot clock?
while barry is a guard, shoots 3's normally, no problemo
Dre_7
05-06-2006, 09:52 PM
:lol Pat Burke
Dre_7
05-06-2006, 09:52 PM
Eddie House. :lmao
ploto
05-06-2006, 10:18 PM
So youre not gonna write a paragraph about how classless Barry was like you did for Nazr?
No- because it was not classless. There is a world of difference between the center throwing up a three with 17 seconds to go in a game and 10 seconds left on the shot clock and the SG- who is the 3 point specialist- shooting one with over a minute to go. Just as it would have classless for Manu to go in for a dunk at the end of game 5, and he had enough sense not to.
All you have to know is this: Pop was pissed at what Nazr did and his teammates even publicly agreed he should not have done it. Everyone was fine with what Brent did. There was not a mention of it anywhere but here.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.