PDA

View Full Version : Nick complaining about time.



2centsworth
05-12-2006, 01:31 PM
Mike Monroe
Express-News Staff Writer

http://www.mysanantonio.com/sports/basketball/nba/spurs/stories/MYSA051206.5D.BKNspurs.vanexel.21c7070a.html

Nick Van Exel goes into Saturday's Game3 against the Dallas Mavericks knowing the NBA doesn't assign the same officials to two consecutive games in one series.

If only the Spurs could be as certain Van Exel won't take himself out of Saturday's game with another poor shooting performance.
Through the first eight playoff games, Van Exel has made 4 of 23 shots. He made three in the second quarter of the first-round opener against the Sacramento Kings but did not play in Game4 of that series. He logged fewer than six minutes Tuesday in Game2 against the Mavericks before referee Steve Javie called two technical fouls and ejected him.

"That's ridiculous to be in the league this long and get that kind of technical," Van Exel said. "I don't even know what I said. I don't think I said that many words. I know I wasn't cussing."

Van Exel had only enough court time to get up one shot, a missed 3-pointer. His 17.4 percent shooting in the playoffs leads to concerns about his left elbow, which contains debris from old injuries and occasionally was painful enough to land him on the inactive list.

"Everything's fine," Van Exel said. "I'm not worried about stuff like that. With me, to be effective, I need to be playing. It's hard for me to justify anything I'm doing playing spot minutes.

"Four for 23? Man, that's one game for me."

Spurs coach Gregg Popovich insists Van Exel remains his choice to back up point guard Tony Parker, no matter how poorly he has shot.

"Nick's a playoff player, and I'm going to stick with him," Popovich said. "That's all I'm going to say."

One reason the Spurs signed Van Exel last summer was the memory of his clutch shooting against the Spurs in the 2003 Western Conference finals. Van Exel averaged 19.5 points in the Mavericks' 20 playoff games that season, seven points above his regular-season average.

Van Exel said a lack of aggression offensively is most responsible for his poor shooting this playoff season.

"I just need to take the shots that are good shots," he said. "I'm not being aggressive enough. I'm passing first and attacking second. I've got to get my mind frame right going into the game, and that (shooting) will take care of itself.

"Four for 23? I'm not concerned about that. I haven't had good looks, so I'm not really concerned about that at all."

Van Exel says it has been difficult adjusting to sporadic playing time with the Spurs. Too often, he said, he has played "like a robot."

"I'm going out there and being aggressive when I'm out there, no matter how much time it is," he said. "I say that very easily, but most nights, I don't do that. I just go out there and play like a robot.

"On Saturday I'm going to go out there and just play."

It will be easier knowing he won't have to look over his shoulder for Javie, whom Van Exel contends once called him a "miserable person" while ejecting him from a game in 2001.

MannyIsGod
05-12-2006, 01:33 PM
I woudl have been suprised to see Van Exel complacent. The fact that he doesn't feel satisfied is a good thing.

T Park
05-12-2006, 01:34 PM
Nick's a playoff player, and I'm going to stick with him," Popovich said. "That's all I'm going to say."



adios.

DarrinS
05-12-2006, 02:03 PM
I've never been that much of a NVE fan.

He's never seen a shot that he doesn't like. If he gets the ball, you're almost 99.9% sure he'll shoot it, because he NEVER PASSES.


So, if you're that kind of player, and you don't hit shots, you're pretty much useless.


I did think it was funny when he threw towels at Jalen Rose.


By the way, Nick, the 1970's called and they want their socks back. :fro

picnroll
05-12-2006, 02:05 PM
"Four for 23? Man, that's one game for me."

Couldn't have said it better.

Ed Helicopter Jones
05-12-2006, 02:24 PM
I don't really get from the article that he's complaining that much about playing time. . .maybe he his and just knows better that to come out and state it directly.

He's certainly using it as an excuse for his poor shooting.

I just look at 4 for 23 as a sign that he's due.

ALVAREZ6
05-12-2006, 02:34 PM
If I were Pop, he wouldn't be on the playoff roster.

ploto
05-12-2006, 02:43 PM
I would not use the word sporadic to describe NVE's playing time. When healthy, he has been the back-up and has played the minutes a back-up would play, and sometimes even more. Pop has used a two PG line-up at times even to get Nick more minutes. As for sporadic minutes, ask Beno. His role has been infinitely more sporadic and he has looked pretty ready just about every time his number has been called.

2centsworth
05-12-2006, 02:48 PM
I woudl have been suprised to see Van Exel complacent. The fact that he doesn't feel satisfied is a good thing.
I like that he is not satisfied. However, I don't want his disatisfaction to turn into a distraction like he's been in the past with other teams. we got a glimpce of how his attitude can hurt a team in game 2.

Shaolin-Style
05-12-2006, 02:54 PM
Maybe if he plays like he has something to prove he'll get more minutes, until then he needs to stop being completely passive on defense and stop making dumb tos.

Beaverfuzz
05-12-2006, 02:56 PM
If I were Pop, he wouldn't be on the playoff roster.

So which PG would you have on the roster to replace him? Don't get me wrong, I can't stand the Cincy "Huggins" Thug but who would replace him as a backup PG on the roster?

Or does Tony/Beno and a combo of Manu/Brent do it for you?

strangeweather
05-12-2006, 03:00 PM
"I'm not being aggressive enough. I'm passing first and attacking second."

God forbid a point guard would look for the pass.

RON ARTEST
05-12-2006, 03:16 PM
why the fuck did you guys sign this idiot? because of what he did 3 years ago? i hope that wasnt the reason. i think they should let him go after this year and let beno develop. maybe even sign speedy claxton again. bobby jackson is probably coming back to sacto anyway.

RON ARTEST
05-12-2006, 03:17 PM
God forbid a point guard would look for the pass.
:lmao

pache100
05-12-2006, 03:21 PM
why the fuck did you guys sign this idiot? because of what he did 3 years ago? i hope that wasnt the reason. i think they should let him go after this year and let beno develop. maybe even sign speedy claxton again. bobby jackson is probably coming back to sacto anyway.

Um...why the fuck did the Kings get you?

SA Gunslinger
05-12-2006, 03:23 PM
I like Nick's attitude but his defense was atrocious in game two. Before he was ejected, he was letting Harris, Terry, and Howard blow right by him.

That being said, I love veteran players that still has something to prove. Nick definitely has something to prove.

GoSpurs21
05-12-2006, 03:27 PM
so TiMVP what happened to your boy?
I thought this was when he was going to show up and be big?
4-23 that pretty big....if you are talking about busts, but at least he's pretty slow on defense

RON ARTEST
05-12-2006, 03:53 PM
Um...why the fuck did the Kings get you?
because they knew i would make there defense much better and i would become a great leader on the floor. not to mention it was the best way to get rid of that pussy ass player who makes me sick to the fucking stomach. peja chokeacovic. but anyway dont be mad at me because your spurs made the WRONG choice in signing a washed up player who plays no defense.

Kori Ellis
05-12-2006, 03:58 PM
Pretty misleading thread title.

It doesn't sound like complaining to me. It just sounds like he's saying that he doesn't play enough minutes that the stats mean much.

I never expected Nick to be a high percentage shooter or anything. I just expected him to a game like Game 2 against the Kings every once in a while, and to relieve Tony in the backcourt for 5-10mpg.

1Parker1
05-12-2006, 03:59 PM
I'm passing first and attacking second.

Ok, I'm not sure I agree that he's doing that.

But I agree with EHJ, 4-23 just makes me think he's due for a HUGE game and Timvp is due for a thread proclaiming he was right about NVE this whole time. :lol

ALVAREZ6
05-12-2006, 04:36 PM
So which PG would you have on the roster to replace him? Don't get me wrong, I can't stand the Cincy "Huggins" Thug but who would replace him as a backup PG on the roster?
anyone.

Or does Tony/Beno and a combo of Manu/Brent do it for you?
That does it for me, Brent can play PG as well.

ashbeeigh
05-12-2006, 07:36 PM
Beno


What about him? If you haven't heard already they're 0-3 when lamo plays.

Dre_7
05-12-2006, 07:53 PM
Beno has been pretty bad in the playoffs. For as much as people complain about NVE, he has been a lot better than Beno. And to say that NVE doesnt pass is stupid. Anyone watching the first two games of this series can not say that NVE hasnt been passing.

Tek_XX
05-12-2006, 08:13 PM
Pretty misleading thread title.

It doesn't sound like complaining to me. It just sounds like he's saying that he doesn't play enough minutes that the stats mean much.

I never expected Nick to be a high percentage shooter or anything. I just expected him to a game like Game 2 against the Kings every once in a while, and to relieve Tony in the backcourt for 5-10mpg.

Wasn't he complaining about minutes in the Sacramento series, something to the effect of, "well i didn't tell pop i was hurting, so i don't know why he isn't playing me". So yeah whether or not he's complaining here, he has been complaining about it.

picnroll
05-12-2006, 08:17 PM
You put in Nick and you might as well just give Duncan two fouls trying to cover Terry or Harris blowing by NeVEr.

Spurologist
05-12-2006, 08:20 PM
Time for a realty check for Vanx. WTF have I done for the spurs this postseason? Next question. Do I think my minutes are justified? Hmmm. Maybe it is time for my to shut up and play.

Das Texan
05-12-2006, 08:31 PM
well NVE could ahve more time.


but he got tossed tuesday like an idiot.

Deb
05-12-2006, 08:33 PM
well NVE could ahve more time.


but he got tossed tuesday like an idiot.
Supposedly, he didn't say much to the refs, and it was a Javvie "hate me" thing. Any thoughts?

picnroll
05-12-2006, 08:37 PM
Supposedly, he didn't say much to the refs, and it was a Javvie "hate me" thing. Any thoughts?
Yeah. If Nick could have just hung in their 5 more minutes he would have gotten his 10 and we would have won. :lol

timvp
05-12-2006, 08:56 PM
Yeah. If Nick could have just hung in their 5 more minutes he would have gotten his 10 and we would have won. :lol

Ball don't lie :smokin

On the replay, Van Exel got a technical for saying "Come on, ref".

:jack

Deb
05-12-2006, 09:03 PM
Ball don't lie :smokin

On the replay, Van Exel got a technical for saying "Come on, ref".

:jack
Actually, I heard NVE said "please, Mr Javvie, can't you have a little mercy, please, please?"

T Park
05-13-2006, 12:26 AM
I love how picnroll mentions Duncan having to cover for Van Exel, when Beno looked like a scared school girl when Terry and Harris blew by him in game 2.

picnroll
05-13-2006, 08:37 AM
The more NeVEr sucks the more T Park talks about Beno. Nimrod they are two seperate discussions. There are other guys that can play besides Beno or NeVEr to fill in the PG minutes like Barry and Manu or did you miss the Detroit series last year?.

Let me help you out with this:


VAN EXEL SUCKS

Beginning and end of subject.